DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Building Statistics of the Private Sector As Reported by Local Government Institutions, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Statistical release P5041.3 Selected building statistics of the private sector as reported by local government institutions, 2008 Embargoed until: 29 June 2009 10:00 Enquiries: Forthcoming issue: Expected release date User Information Services 2009 June 2010 Tel: (012) 310 8600 / 4892 / 8390 Statistics South Africa i P5041.3 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ ii Key findings ....................................................................................................................... iii List of detailed tables ......................................................................................................... xxvii List of municipalities covered in the monthly survey.......................................................... xxxvii Municipal reporting of building plans passed aggregated to provincial level..................... 1 Municipal reporting of building plans passed by province and municipality ...................... 17 Municipal reporting of buildings completed aggregated to provincial level ....................... 89 Municipal reporting of buildings completed by province and municipality......................... 105 Municipalities covered in the monthly survey .................................................................... 177 Explanatory notes .............................................................................................................. 185 Glossary............................................................................................................................. 187 General information ........................................................................................................... 188 Selected building statistics of the private sector, 2008 Statistics South Africa ii P5041.3 Introduction Data published in this statistical release are based on a monthly survey of Cross-border municipalities metropolitan municipalities and large local municipalities on building plans passed The boundaries and the names of local government institutions have changed as and buildings completed for the private sector, released monthly on national and described in the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act No. 117 provincial level as P5041.1. This annual release contains aggregated data for the of 1998) and the Local Government Municipal Demarcation Bill (B36B-98). twelve months of 2008 by province, municipality and type of building. Further information may be found on the website of the South African Purpose of the survey Government, www.gov.za, see section GOVZA: Government System; and the website of the Municipal Demarcation Board, www.demarcation.org.za. In some The results of the survey are used to monitor the state of the economy and the cases borders of municipalities extend over two provinces. formulation of economic policy. Furthermore, the results are important inputs to estimate the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and to calculate the Composite Merafong City Local Municipality is the only cross-border municipality for which Leading Business Cycle Indicator. The data are extensively used by the private data have been reported in two different provinces in the annual statistical sector. release P5041.3, namely in Gauteng up to 2006 and from 2007 in North West. Table B lists the percentage contribution of building activities for Merafong City Low-cost housing projects as reported by the National Department of Local Municipality to the total value of the province in which the municipality was Housing included in the specific year. Data regarding low-cost housing, generated by the National Department of Housing from reports on the Housing Subsidy System (HSS) and confirmed and Table B – Merafong City Local Municipality: Percentage contribution of amended, if necessary, by the Provincial Housing Departments (PHD), are shown building activities according to province and year in Table A. Type of building Municipal Municipal Municipal Table A – Subsidised low-cost dwelling-houses completed and in process of activity percentage percentage percentage completion: 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 contribution contribution contribution Province Number1 R'0002,3 of building of building of building Eastern Cape 12 684 397 248 plans passed/ plans passed/ plans passed/ Free State 12 482 473 160 buildings buildings buildings Gauteng 90 886 2 612 566 completed completed completed KwaZulu-Natal 34 471 1 311 040 to the total to the total to the total Limpopo 18 970 635 351 value reported value reported value reported Mpumalanga 16 569 652 190 for Gauteng for North West for North West North West 19 945 785 510 in 2006 in 2007 in 2008 Northern Cape 8 686 231 021 Passed 0,3 3,9 5,5 Western Cape 34 517 1 121 708 Completed 0,2 2,9 2,8 South Africa 249 210 8 219 794 Response rate: The response rate for the year 2008 was 100%. Source: Housing Subsidy System and Provincial Housing Departments coordinated by the National Department of Housing (Table A presents the latest available data) 1 All top structures completed and sites serviced in respect of the reporting period. 2 Expenditure by the Provincial Housing Departments in respect of subsidies for the financial year 2007/08. 3 Subsidies not yet fully paid out in all cases. Selected building statistics of the private sector, 2008 Statistics South Africa iii P5041.3 Key findings Value of recorded building plans passed by larger municipalities for 2008 by Value of recorded building plans passed by larger municipalities for 2008 type of building by province The highest provincial contribution to the total value of building plans passed The value of recorded building plans passed by the larger municipalities for 2008 during 2008 was reported for Gauteng (contributing 41,3% or R32 828,6 amounted to R79 474,8 million. Residential building plans passed contributed the million to the total of R79 474,8 million of South Africa), followed by Western most to the total value of building plans passed (48,5% or R38 498,7 million), Cape (21,0% or R16 693,7 million) and KwaZulu-Natal (19,1% or R15 211,8 followed by additions and alterations (28,4% or R22 591,2 million) and non- million) (see Figure 2). Table D (page v) lists the largest municipal contributors residential buildings (23,1% or R18 384,8 million) (see Figure 1 and Table 1, page to the value of recorded building plans passed for 2008 by province. 1). Figure 2 – Provincial percentage contribution to the total value of building Figure 1 – Percentage contribution of the value of type of building to the plans passed for 2008 total value of building plans passed for 2008 Percentage contribution Percentage contribution Limpopo Western Cape Mpumalanga 2,2% 21,0% 4,8% Additions and alterations Dwelling-houses Eastern Cape 28,4% 61,7% 4,1% Residential buildings 48,5% Northern Cape Flats and townhouses 0,6% 34,2% Gauteng Non-residential buildings 41,3% 23,1% Other residential buildings 4,1% Free State 3,0% KwaZulu-Natal 19,1% North West 3,9% Regarding residential building plans passed, the largest contribution was recorded for dwelling-houses (61,7% or R23 763,5 million), followed by flats and townhouses (34,2% or R13 160,3 million) and other residential buildings (4,1% or R1 575,0 million) (see Table 2, page 3). Selected building statistics of the private sector, 2008 Statistics South Africa iv P5041.3 Value of recorded building plans passed by the six metropolitan Figure 3 – Metropolitan percentage contribution to the total value of municipalities for 2008 building plans passed for 2008 The combined value of building plans passed for the six metropolitan municipalities contributed 64,1% or R50 938,0 million to the total value of building Percentage contribution plans passed (R79 474,8 million) during 2008 (see Table C). 18,0 16,3 Table C – Value of recorded building plans passed by the six metropolitan 15,6 16,0 municipalities for 2008 14,0 Value of Metropolitan 12,4 11,6 building municipal 12,0 plans percentage passed contribution 10,0 Metropolitan at to the total 8,0 municipality metropolitan value of building 6,9 municipal plans passed 6,0 level R million 4,0 City of Cape Town 12 377,1 15,6 Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality 984,0 1,2 2,0 1,2 Ethekwini Municipality 9 223,0 11,6 City of Johannesburg 5 523,4 6,9 0,0 City of Cape Town Nelson Mandela Bay Ethekwini Municipality City of Johannesburg City of Tshwane Ekurhuleni City of Tshwane 12 990,3 16,3 Municipality Metropolitan Municipality Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality 9 840,2 12,4 Total metropolitan municipalities 50 938,0 64,1 The highest metropolitan percentage contribution to the total value of building plans passed during 2008 was recorded by City of Tshwane (16,3% or R12 990,3 million), followed by City of Cape Town (15,6% or R12 377,1 million) and Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (12,4% or R9 840,2 million) (see Table C and Figure 3). Selected building statistics of the private sector, 2008 Statistics South Africa v P5041.3 Table D – The largest municipal contributors to the value of recorded Table D – The largest municipal contributors to the value of recorded building plans passed for 2008 by province building plans passed for 2008 by province (concluded) Value of Municipal Value of Municipal Province/Municipality building percentage Reference Province/municipality building percentage Reference plans contribution plans contribution passed to value of passed to value of at building plans at building plans provincial/ passed
Recommended publications
  • Flower Route Map 2014 LR

    Flower Route Map 2014 LR

    K o n k i e p en w R31 Lö Narubis Vredeshoop Gawachub R360 Grünau Karasburg Rosh Pinah R360 Ariamsvlei R32 e N14 ng Ora N10 Upington N10 IAi-IAis/Richtersveld Transfrontier Park Augrabies N14 e g Keimoes Kuboes n a Oranjemund r Flower Hotlines O H a ib R359 Holgat Kakamas Alexander Bay Nababeep N14 Nature Reserve R358 Groblershoop N8 N8 Or a For up-to-date information on where to see the Vioolsdrif nge H R27 VIEWING TIPS best owers, please call: Eksteenfontein a r t e b e e Namakwa +27 (0)79 294 7260 N7 i s Pella t Lekkersing t Brak u West Coast +27 (0)72 938 8186 o N10 Pofadder S R383 R383 Aggeneys Flower Hour i R382 Kenhardt To view the owers at their best, choose the hottest Steinkopf R363 Port Nolloth N14 Marydale time of the day, which is from 11h00 to 15h00. It’s the s in extended ower power hour. Respect the ower Tu McDougall’s Bay paradise: Walk with care and don’t trample plants R358 unnecessarily. Please don’t pick any buds, bulbs or N10 specimens, nor disturb any sensitive dune areas. Concordia R361 R355 Nababeep Okiep DISTANCE TABLE Prieska Goegap Nature Reserve Sun Run fels Molyneux Buf R355 Springbok R27 The owers always face the sun. Try and drive towards Nature Reserve Grootmis R355 the sun to enjoy nature’s dazzling display. When viewing Kleinzee Naries i R357 i owers on foot, stand with the sun behind your back. R361 Copperton Certain owers don’t open when it’s overcast.
  • Report on Consultative Hearings Into the State of Shelters in South Africa

    Report on Consultative Hearings Into the State of Shelters in South Africa

    REPORT ON CONSULTATIVE HEARINGS INTO THE STATE OF SHELTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA REPORT ON CONSULTATIVE HEARINGS INTO THE STATE OF SHELTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA Copyright: 2020 Commission on Gender Equality. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, photocopied or transmitted in any form nor part thereof be distributed for profit-making purposes without prior written consent of the Commission for Gender Equality. Publisher: Commission for Gender Equality ISBN: 978-1-920308-86-5 Copy Editor: Proof Africa Design: Layout & Printing: JKMN Consulting REPORT ON CONSULTATIVE HEARINGS INTO THE STATE OF SHELTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA Content Acronyms 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Objectives 9 3. National Department of Social Development 11 4. Department of Social Development - Gauteng 22 5. Department of Social Development - North West 28 6. Department of Social Development - Mpumalanga 38 7. Gauteng Community Safety 42 8. Department of Social Development - Free State 49 9. Department of Social Development - Western Cape 60 10. Department of Social Development - Northern Cape 78 11. Department of Social Development - Eastern Cape 83 12. Department of Social Development - KwaZulu-Natal 99 13. Department of Social Development - Limpopo 102 14. South African Police Service 109 15. National Department of Labour 115 16. Department of National Treasury 116 17. Department of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities 129 18. Department of Human Settlements 134 19. National Department of Health (NDOH) 142 20. Department of Public Works and Infrastructure 155 21. Overall findings 157 22. Overall Recommendations 158 List of Tables Table 1: Gauteng overview 11 Table 2: Western Cape funding for shelters 13 Table 3: Shelters for Free State and budget allocations 14 Table 4: Number of shelters funded in South Africa 15 Table 5: Number of white door centres across provinces 15 Table 6.
  • Cape-Agulhas-WC033 2020 IDP Amendment

    Cape-Agulhas-WC033 2020 IDP Amendment

    REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS TO THE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020/21 CAPE AGULHAS MUNICIPALITY REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS TO THE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020/21 29 My 2020 Together for excellence Saam vir uitnemendheid Sisonke siyagqwesa 1 | P a g e REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS TO THE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020/21 SECTIONS THAT ARE AMENDED AND UPDATED FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR (UPDATED)............................................................................ 4 FOREWORD BY THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER (UPDATED) ..................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO CAPE AGULHAS MUNICIPALITY (UPDATED) ......................................... 7 1.2 THE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROCESS ......................................................... 8 1.2.4 PROCESS PLAN AND SCHEDULE OF KEY DEADLINES (AMENDMENT) ........................... 8 1.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION STRUCTURES, PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES .................................. 9 1.3.3 MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC WORKSHOP (UPDATED) .................................................... 10 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL STRATEGY ALIGNMENT ................................. 11 2.2.2 WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL PERSPECTIVE (AMENDED) ............................................. 11 3 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS...............................................................................................................
  • National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West to Britstown

    National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West to Britstown

    STAATSKOERANT, 15 OKTOBER 2010 NO.33630 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 904 15 October 2010 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED Registration No: 98109584106 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD N12 SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION No. 631 OF 2005 By virtue of section 40(1)(b) of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and the National Roads Act, 1998 (Act NO.7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 631 of 2005, by substituting the descriptive section of the route from Victoria West up to Britstown, with the subjoined sheets 1 to 27 of Plan No. P727/08. (National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West - Britstown) VI ~/ o8 ~I ~ ~ ... ... CD +' +' f->< >< >< lli.S..E..I VICTORIA WEST / Ul ~ '-l Ul ;Ii; o o -// m y 250 »JJ z _-i ERF 2614 U1 iii,..:.. "- \D o lL. C\J a­ Q:: lL. _<n lLJ ~ Q:: OJ olLJ lL. m ~ Q:: Q) lLJ JJ N12/5 lL. ~ fj- Q:: ~ I\J a DECLARATION VICTORIA lLJ ... ... .... PLAN No. P745/09 +' a REM 550 +' :£ >< y -/7 0 >< WEST >< 25 Vel von stel die podreserwe voor von 'n gedeelte Z Die Suid Afrikoonse Nosionole Podogentskop 8eperk Die figuur getoon Sheet 1 of 27 a represents the rood reserve of 0 portion ~:~:~:~: ~ :~: ~:~:~:~:~:~ The figure shown w The South African Notional Roods Agency Limited ........... von Nosionole Roete Seksie 6 Plan w :.:-:-:-:.:.:-:.:-:-:.: N12 OJ of Notional Route Section P727108 w a D.O.9.A • U1 01 o II') g 01' ICTORIA0' z "­ o o (i: WEST \V II> ..... REM ERF 9~5 II') w ...
  • General Agreement On

    General Agreement On

    RESTRICTED ON L/1852 GENERALGENERALAGREEMENTAGREEMENT ON 15 October 1962 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES 23 October-16 November 1962 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BALANCE-OF-PAYMENTS RESTRICTIONS ON THE CONSULTATION UNDER ARTICLE XII:4(b) WITH THE REPULBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 1. The Committee has conducted the 1962 consultation with the Republic of South Africa under the provisions of paragraph 4(b) of Article XII. The Committee had before it (a) a basic document prepared by the South African authorities (BOP/12)1 and (b) documents provided by the International Monetary Fund, as noted in paragraph 2 below. In conducting the consultation the Committee followed the Plan for such consultations recommended by the CONTRACTING PARTIES (BISD, 7/S/97-98). The consultation was completed on 1 October 1962. The present report summarizes the main points of discussion during the consultation. Consultation with the International Monetary Fund 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Article XV of the General Agreement, the CONTRACTING PARTIES had invited the International Monetary Fund to consult with them in connexion with this consultation with South Africa. In accordance with the agreed procedure the representative of the Fund was invited to make a state- ment supplementing the Fund s documentation concerning the position of South Africa. The statement made was as follows: "The International Monetary Fund has transmitted to the CONTRACTING PARTIES the Executive Board decision relating to the last consultation with the Republic of South Africa under Article XIV of the Fund Agreement and the background material prepared in connection with that consultation. The background material was prepared before the announcement at the end of August last of further measures of relaxation (see Annex A, paragraph 21).
  • SANBS-Mpumalanga-Partners.Pdf

    SANBS-Mpumalanga-Partners.Pdf

    Your blood runs through our system MPUMALANGA PARTNERS Matla Powerstation Power Plant Electrical Technologies Transnet McCain Delmas Prestige Personnel Witbank Transnet Freight Rail McCarthy VW Commercial Pretorius Group of Companies Transnet Freight Rail McGees Pro Property Ttuni Truck stop Medicare Pharmacy Middelburg Proconics Secunda Tubatse Alloy Mediclinic Highveld Protea Highveld Hotel Tubatse Ferrochrome Mediclinic Nelspruit Protea Hotel Beaty Street Tutuka Megabus Protea Hotel by Marriott® Nelspruit Tutuni Truck stop Megchem PWC Twee- Fontein Mine Mercure Hotel Ranch Butchery Tweefontein Open Cut Mica Rand Carbide Twickenham Mine Mica Nelspruit RCL Foods Consumer PTY LTD Twistdraai Central Middelbult Myn Ringkink Saagmeule Twizza PTY LTD Middelbult/Shondoni Colliery Riverside Circle TWK Piet Retief Middelburg Ferro Chrome Rob Ferreira Hospitaal Two Rivers North Shaft Middelburg Provincial Hospital RTM Two Rivers Platinum Mine Minolta Rudamans Ukhozi Lodge MMC SA Zero Waste Unigrad Modikwa Mine HR Offices SABC Union Motors PC Modikwa Mine North Shaft Sabie Hospital Union Trucks Momentum SAKPRO White River Unjani clinic Mkhuhlu Motomid Samancor Valencia Wholesaler Mototolo Mine Borwa Shaft Sanlam Middelburg Van Wettens Mototolo Mine Lebowa Shaft SARS Vector Logistics Mpact Sasol Vikela Road Demarcation & Safety Mpumalanga Economic Regulator SASSA Wellness Day Vodacom MRA Quantumsure Schoeman Boerdery Volle Evangelie Kerk Barberton Multifranchise Schoonbee Landgoed Voltex N4 Business Park Secunda Junxion Waterfall Park Nashua Secunda
  • C . __ P Ar T 1 0 F 2 ...".)

    C . __ P Ar T 1 0 F 2 ...".)

    March Vol. 669 12 2021 No. 44262 Maart C..... __ P_AR_T_1_0_F_2_...".) 2 No. 44262 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 12 MARCH 2021 Contents Page No. Transport, Department of / Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Applications for Permits Menlyn ............................................................................................................................... 3 Applications Concerning Operating Licences Goodwood ......................................................................................................................... 7 Goodwood ......................................................................................................................... 23 Goodwood ......................................................................................................................... 76 Johannesburg – GPGTSHW968 ....................................................................................... 119 STAATSKOERANT, 12 Maart 2021 No. 44262 3 CROSS-BORDER ROAD TRANSPORT AGENCY APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS Particulars in respect of applications for permits as submitted to the Cross-Border Road Transport Agency, indicating, firstly, the reference number, and then- (i) the name of the applicant and the name of the applicant's representative, if applicable. (ii) the country of departure, destination and, where applicable, transit. (iii) the applicant's postal address or, in the case of a representative applying on behalf of the applicant, the representative's postal address. (iv) the number and type of vehicles,
  • 2019-20 Integrated Annual Report

    2019-20 Integrated Annual Report

    INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT TWENTY TWENTY AUDITOR-GENERAL OF SOUTH AFRICA INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2020 THE 2020 REPORT THEME This integrated The public debate about the failure of accountability annual report is available mechanisms in the public sector led to the amended on the AGSA website Public Audit Act enhancing the auditor-general’s www.agsa.co.za powers to enable accountability. The powers allow us to take binding remedial action if material irregularities are not appropriately addressed and, where necessary, issue a certificate of debt to recover lost money from accounting officers or authorities. We accept our powers with the seriousness that they deserve and, in turn, we subject our use of these powers to full scrutiny, ensuring that we are held to 2 the same strict level of accountability as those Preamble to the Constitution we audit. ABOUT 3 THIS REPORT Letter to the Speaker As part of our legislated accountability, we provide Parliament with a detailed report of the Auditor- General South Africa’s annual activities. We also 4 align to the following best practices, standards and legislation: Performance snapshot • Public Audit Act 25 of 2004 (PAA) • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards • International Integrated Reporting <IR> framework • King IV principles and codes • ISSAI 12 • Sustainable development goals This report is based on our annual activities measured against our commitments detailed in our 2019-22 strategic plan and budget. We welcome feedback on our integrated annual report to continue providing pertinent information in our reporting. Written feedback can be sent to [email protected] or reach out on twitter at @AuditorGen_SA 1 PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION We the people of South Africa, Recognise the injustices of our past; Honour those who suffered for justice and freedom in our land; Respect those who have worked to build and develop our country; and Believe that South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united in our diversity.
  • Chapter 4: Prince Albert Spatial Development Framework

    Chapter 4: Prince Albert Spatial Development Framework

    CHAPTER 4: PRINCE ALBERT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 4.1 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT VISION STATEMENT The vision to guide the 2020 Prince Albert MSDF is to: “Develop Prince Albert as a place of resilience and environmental quality with a unique and distinctive sense of place - where people choose to live, work and visit, an exemplar in the achievement of sustainable growth” This vision links to the 2020 Central Karoo District MSDF vision, which is: “Working together in Sustainable Spatial Development and Growth towards a Resilient Central Karoo” The municipal wide spatial concept used to realise the above vision, is shown in Figure 4.1 across. There are 5 socio-ecological systems of resilience shown in the shape of a ‘Caracal Paw’. Resilience refers to the capability of individuals, social groups, or sub social-ecological systems, not only to live with changes, disturbances, adversities or disasters (such as drought) but to adapt, innovate and transform into new, more desirable configurations. The palm and heart of the Caracal Paw is Prince Albert Historic Town together with the Swartberg Mountain Range, Swartberg Circle (R328 and R407), various mountain passes, dams, Klaarstroom Historic Town and N12 national and provincial route because together they provide the highest social, economic and political offering, road accessibility, upstream water source and storage and ecological connectivity for the region. The first toe (Prince Albert Road) is ecologically connected via the Dwyka River and infrastructurally through the N1 & R407. This toe is connected to the second toe (Leeu Gamka Town and Kruidfontein) via the N1 national route, which in turn feeds Prince Albert through the R 407.
  • Nkangala District Municipality 2019-20 IDP Reviewed

    Nkangala District Municipality 2019-20 IDP Reviewed

    NKANGALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY 2nd REVIEW 2019-2020 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN i | P a g e N k a n g a l a D istrict Municipality: 2019/20 IDP Table of Contents FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................................................. vi TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................................. vii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... IX FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR .......................................................................................................................... 12 MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 13 THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IDP DOCUMENT ............................................................................ 14 CHAPTER ONE: ............................................................................................................................. 16 1.1 District Geography ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1 Guiding Parameters .....................................................................................................................................................
  • Affordability and Subsidies in Urban Public Transport: Assessing the Impact of Public Transport Affordability on Subsidy Allocation in Cape Town

    Affordability and Subsidies in Urban Public Transport: Assessing the Impact of Public Transport Affordability on Subsidy Allocation in Cape Town

    Affordability and Subsidies in Urban Public Transport: Assessing the impact of public transport affordability on subsidy allocation in Cape Town by Jaco Piek Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MCom (Transport Economics) in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Mr. JA Van Rensburg December 2017 The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis/dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT Cape Town is characterised by high commuting costs and high travel times due to a spatial mismatch between housing and jobs, as a result of apartheid planning policies. This dissertation investigated the use of an Intra-City Affordability Index to better understand this mismatch by analysing transport expenditure and potential travel patterns of public transport commuters in Cape Town. The results from the constructed affordability index analysed public transport affordability within this context.
  • Contract RT57-2019 Contract Circular - Pricing for the Period 1 August 2020 to 30 November 2020 Date 14-Aug-20

    Contract RT57-2019 Contract Circular - Pricing for the Period 1 August 2020 to 30 November 2020 Date 14-Aug-20

    Contract RT57-2019 Contract Circular - Pricing for the period 1 August 2020 to 30 November 2020 Date 14-Aug-20 Combined Make and Subsidised(SUB) or Awarded Price New Price Incl. Ref # Item Number Description Company Name Ranking Model General Purpose (GP) IncludingVAT VAT Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors-piston displacement up to 1900cm3, Hybrid (pool vehicles 3352 RT57-00-01 Toyota South Africa (Pty) Ltd Prius 1.8 42G 1 GP R446,144.00 R446,144.00 only) Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors - piston displacement 1901cm³ to 3000cm³, Hybrid(Pool Lexus IS300H HYBRID 3354 RT57-00-02 Toyota South Africa (Pty) Ltd 1 GP R632,285.00 R632,285.00 vehicles only) 39M Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors - piston displacement 1901cm³ to 3000cm³, Hybrid(Pool 3357 RT57-00-02 Toyota South Africa (Pty) Ltd UX 250 SE Hybrid 68C 2 GP R637,424.00 R637,424.00 vehicles only) Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors - piston displacement 1901cm³ to 3000cm³, Hybrid(Pool 3355 RT57-00-02 Toyota South Africa (Pty) Ltd Lexus NX300 Hybrid 23T 3 GP R721,001.00 R721,001.00 vehicles only) Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors - piston displacement 1901cm³ to 3000cm³, Hybrid(Pool Lexus ES 300 HYBRID SE 3353 RT57-00-02 Toyota South Africa (Pty) Ltd 4 GP R765,485.00 R765,485.00 vehicles only) 21J Four/Five seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3/5 doors - piston displacement 1901cm³ to 3000cm³, Hybrid(Pool BMW 7 Series BMW 740e 363 RT57-00-02 BMW (South Africa) 5 GP R1,067,000.00 R1,067,000.00 vehicles only) Sedan (G11) BMW i BMW i3 (120Ah 364 RT57-00-07 Any Fully Electrical Vehicle (Sedan/Hatch/SUV/MPV) 4x2 or 4x4, NON-Hybrid (Pool vehicles only) BMW (South Africa) 1 GP R589,500.00 R589,500.00 BEV) Hatch (BMW i) Four seater sedan 4 door or hatch 3-5 doors ,piston displacement up to 1250 cm (Petrol/Diesel) 2630 RT57-01-12-01 Nissan South Africa (Pty) Ltd.