The Kennedy Conundrum They'd Heard a Shot from the Knoll

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Kennedy Conundrum They'd Heard a Shot from the Knoll NATIONAL AFFAIRS what the Warren Commission was forced to conclude, despite witnesses who said The Kennedy Conundrum they'd heard a shot from the knoll. Connal- ly insists that he and Kennedy were hit by different shots—and Abraham Zapruder's Still too many questions—and too many answers famous home movie of the assassination proves Oswald alone wouldn't have had the time to fire them both. An American writer n all the news stories leading up to the all accept that both Oswald and Jack Ruby, named Steve Rivele even says there were 25th anniversary of the assassination of who asseRsinated Oswald before he could three second gunmen. When he named John F. Kennedy this week, the single stand trial, had linksto the organization of them last month on a Britis h documentary, 'most telling detail may have been a new New Orleans Mafia boss Carlos Marcello- one of the two who are still living came caption on an old photo in The New York a chief target of the Kennedy administra- forward with an alibi. Central Independent Times, "Shortly after the assassination tion's war on crime. (The Warren Report Television and producer Nigel Turner are of President Kennedy," it read, "report- said Ruby, like Oswald, was simply a lone sticking by their story. Rivele is in hiding. ers stood at the spot in the Texas School nut.) But Marcell% now 78, denies he or- Turner's documentary has at least one Book Depository Building from chilling moment, involving a which Lee Harvey Oswald's ri- computer-enhanced photo of fle was fired." [Emphasis add- the grassy knoll, and a man ed.] A quarter century ago, few named Gordon Arnold who be- editors would have hesitated to lieves he's in the picture. Ar- call it "the spot from which Os- nold tells of filming the motor- waldahot the president." But in cade from the knoll when a 1988 this was as much as the bullet from behind whizzed Times seemed willing to assert. mew. ?MP --- past his ear—and someone As assassination researcher Jo- : dressed as a police officer took siah Thompson notes, JFK's • his movie camera. Shown the murder has been "the most in- photo for the first time Arnold vestigated homicide in his- identifies himself, then a uni- tory." And it's only come to 19177SY LULL COMPANY ALL MD MS RESERVED formed man behind a splotch of seem more confusing. light he interprets as a muzzle The official version of what blast. "If this is true," he says, happened in Dallas on Nov. 22, voice quaking, "then I could be 1963, is still that of the Warren the only one who ever saw the Commission: that Oswald, act- man that killed the president ing alone, killed JFK. But the . If I'd known this [photo] was Times's own poll data show here I wouldn't have given the that only 13 percent of Ameri- interview." cans buy it. Two thirds believe Simple solution: The picture, some, version of the counter- says researcher Gary Mack of theory: that there was a con- Ft. Worth, who had it en- spiracy to kill the president. hanced, "is proof positive of a And 61 percent think there has conspiracy." Not likely. It's been an official cover-up. David only one minuscule corner of W. Belin, a former assistant a puzzle that never seems counsel to the Warren Commis- to come together—and which, sion, says they just haven't tak- like any one of a hundred such en the trouble to study its details, can seduce the most ra- much-maligned 1964 report, tional researcher into obses- which dismissed such possibili- gi t96A RORERTJACKSON.-DALLAS TIMES sion. Will a new government ties. Belin's new book, "Final ReSignill to uncertainty'? Above, the Zapruder film shows inquiry settle the whole thing? Disclosure," says critics focus Kennedy as he is shot, below, Jack Ruby shoots Oswald Also unlikely. The really dis- only on evidence that fits their turbing figure in that New awn theories—just as critics York Times poll is that 59 per- say the commission did. cent of Americans oppose fur- Hose mimic Conspiracy theorists have dered the killing. And what would possess ther investigation. Which suggests that blamed, variously, the Soviets, Castro, an otherwise competent crime boss to hire nearly half of us are simply resigned to the anti-Castro Cubans or the CIA. Two new Oswald, with his 521.45 mail-order rifle? uncertainty. There's nothing more Ameri- books, John H. Davis's "Mafia Kingfish" How was Ruby induced to murder Oswald can than an active distrust of institu- and David E. Scheim's "Contract on Ameri- in full view of cope and cameras? tions—it's there in the Constitution—but ca," set forth t he curren tly fashionable the- Scheim, unlike Davis, postulates a sec- the Kennedy assassination has bred a pas- ory: that JFK's killing was a mob hit. The ond gunman on the grassy knoll near sive despair that is unhealthy in a democra- House Select Committee on Assassinations which Kennedy's car was passing. If Os- cy. David Belin has a simple solution: that hinted as much a decade ago; new TV docu- wald did all the shooting, one bullet be- Americans accept the gospel according to mentaries by former Wall Street Journal haved oddly: it tore through Kennedy's the Warren Commission. That's not too reporter Jonathan Kwitny and columnist neck, shattered Texas Gov. John Connal- likely, either. Jack Anderson come to similar conclu- ly's ribs, yet turned up on a hospital DAVID G Arss with FIt ANIC GIBNEY Jr. sions. Despite important differences, they stretcher little the worse for wear. This is in Dallas and Ras RT PA R. RY Wa.shington 46 NEWSWEEK NOVEMBER 2S,1988 .
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7 the Assassination
    Chapter 7: November 22, 1963 Chapter 7 The assassination 1 Introduction Our interest in reviewing the information that is today available to us regarding the events of November 22, 1963, quite naturally focuses on the question as to whether President Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin or by a conspiracy. Other questions pale by comparison to this first and most important question. As we review the eyewitness testimony, we see that the conclusion is not difficult to reach -- that indeed, the President was shot both from the front and the rear. This conclusion can be reached by a consideration of several kinds of evidence: v where the eyewitnesses heard the shots coming from; v eyewitness accounts of the spacing of the shots, which came too close together for the lone assassin hypothesis to be maintained; v the total number of shots was too large for the lone assassin hypothesis to be maintained; v the early shot hitting the President was not the same as the shot hitting Governor Connally, invalidating the lone assassin hypothesis. 1 The route through Dallas The final decision for the President's route in Dallas was determined by Secret Service agent Winston Lawson, on Thursday, November 14.1 The WCR states that "Lawson was not specifi- cally instructed [on Nov. 8] to select the parade route, but he understood that this was one of his functions. Even before the Trade Mart had been definitely selected, Lawson and Sorrels began to consider the best motorcade route from Love Field to the Trade Mart. On November 14, Law- son and Sorrels attended a meeting at Love Field and on their return to Dallas drove over the route which Sorrels believed best suited for the proposed motorcade."2 The route was reviewed and approved by Chief of Police Jesse Curry, Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams by Cynthia A. Burkhead A
    Dancing Dwarfs and Talking Fish: The Narrative Functions of Television Dreams By Cynthia A. Burkhead A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Ph.D. Department of English Middle Tennessee State University December, 2010 UMI Number: 3459290 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3459290 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DANCING DWARFS AND TALKING FISH: THE NARRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF TELEVISION DREAMS CYNTHIA BURKHEAD Approved: jr^QL^^lAo Qjrg/XA ^ Dr. David Lavery, Committee Chair c^&^^Ce~y Dr. Linda Badley, Reader A>& l-Lr 7i Dr./ Jill Hague, Rea J <7VM Dr. Tom Strawman, Chair, English Department Dr. Michael D. Allen, Dean, College of Graduate Studies DEDICATION First and foremost, I dedicate this work to my husband, John Burkhead, who lovingly carved for me the space and time that made this dissertation possible and then protected that space and time as fiercely as if it were his own. I dedicate this project also to my children, Joshua Scanlan, Daniel Scanlan, Stephen Burkhead, and Juliette Van Hoff, my son-in-law and daughter-in-law, and my grandchildren, Johnathan Burkhead and Olivia Van Hoff, who have all been so impressively patient during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide
    Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide STUDY PREPARED BY CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY RESEARCH EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING & PUBLIC POLICY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY with the participation of THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SMART GROWTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND and SCHOOR DEPALMA MANALAPAN, NEW JERSEY STUDY PREPARED FOR NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (NJDCA) DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS and NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION (NJMC) NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF SMART GROWTH (NJOSG) June, 2006 DRAFT—NOT FOR QUOTATION ii CONTENTS Part One: Introduction and Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations Chapter 1. Smart Growth and Infill: Challenge, Opportunity, and Best Practices……………………………………………………………...…..2 Part Two: Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide Section I. General Provisions…………………….…………………………….....33 II. Definitions and Development and Area Designations ………….....36 III. Land Acquisition………………………………………………….……40 IV. Financing for Infill Development ……………………………..……...43 V. Property Taxes……………………………………………………….....52 VI. Procedure………………………………………………………………..57 VII. Design……………………………………………………………….…..68 VIII. Zoning…………………………………………………………………...79 IX. Subdivision and Site Plan…………………………………………….100 X. Documents to be Submitted……………………………………….…135 XI. Design Details XI-1 Lighting………………………………………………….....145 XI-2 Signs………………………………………………………..156 XI-3 Landscaping…………………………………………….....167 Part Three: Background on Infill Development: Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Prosperity the State Role in Revitalizing America’S Older Industrial Cities
    The State Role in Revitalizing America’s Older Industrial Cities The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Restoring Prosperity The State Role in Revitalizing America’s Older Industrial Cities T HE B ROOKINGS I NSTITUTION M ETROPOLITAN P OLICY P ROGRAM © 2007 Acknowledgements The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program is grateful Johnson (William Penn Foundation); John Weiler (F.B. Heron to the many people who have supported this project with their Foundation); and Hal Wolman (GWIPP). Jeremy Nowak (The expertise, insight, and resources. Reinvestment Fund), Diane Bell-McKoy (Associated Black First and foremost, we would like to thank the Surdna Charities), and Sharmain Matlock-Turner (Greater Philadelphia Foundation for their generous support of this effort. We particu- Urban Affairs Coalition) also provided very helpful advice early on larly want to acknowledge the tireless contributions of Kim in the development of the project and report. Burnett, whose knowledge and enthusiasm have helped this proj- We also want to thank Professor Anne Power and her team at ect grow from a single report to a major organizing and research the London School of Economics (LSE) for stimulating our think- effort. We also want to express our gratitude to the F.B. Heron ing about the revival of industrial cities. This project has benefited Foundation and the William Penn Foundation for providing addi- tremendously from the trans-Atlantic exchange of innovations tional funding for this report, as well as the Fannie Mae and ideas our partnership has fostered. We also thank the HM Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the George Gund Foundation, Treasury and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister for support- the Heinz Endowments, the John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Consniracv HW 7/21/80 Like All Assassination Commercializers Who
    Anthc 8anmersiii - Consniracv HW 7/21/80 Like all assassination commercializers who begin with a merchantable formule, Simmers is a ripoff artist who pretends to be generous with credit and isn't except to a few friends to whom he is more indebted than he indicates In order to hide his =originality, while hippodroming his awn supposed investi- gations and research, he rarely gives primary sources. With HSU, nobody having drawn on that source, he cites their repetition of the work of others, for all the world as though it all began with them. There is no word in the book to indicate that he intends anything else. With the Warren Paterials, he cites them instead of the books from which he cribbed what he uses. He thus pretends that this also is his original work: Be is =tidal of those he uses, like Epstein, covering up Epstein's fakery and lies, as with how and wgen Oswald got out of England. Because of his heavy use of its material he is virtually entirely uncritical of the HSGA. and at no point indicates that so much of its work and so large a percentage of its expenditures were devoted to an effort to put down the entire critical community. The practise extends to those he uses as probative when they aren't, like John Wilson. There is little on the assassination and what little there is is not always accurate. (All is unoriginal.) His formula is guilt by presume indirect, alleged association. In some cases, where it is important in his theorizing, it is not accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Service Agent on the Knoll
    THE SECRET SERVICE AGENT ON THE KNOLL by Debra Conway, with contributions from Michael Parks and Mark Colgan Copyright 2001 UPDATED "After the assassination, several witnesses stated they had seen or encountered Secret Service agents behind the stockade fence situated on the grassy knoll area and in the Texas School Book Depository." (HSCA Report pg. 184) Introduction: I suppose the first thing most researchers think when reading about Officer Smith's experience meeting the Secret Service Agent on the knoll is to wonder who it could have been, the second thought has to be, "What nerve!" The creativity of impersonating one of the Presidential Praetorian Guard is one that always stood out in my mind. Our guy is not content with the everyday impersonation of Dallas' finest or the cache of being an FBI agent. (And CIA agents never identify themselves as such so that was out of the question.) But to claim be one of the elite Secret Service, those men with sunglasses and headsets in their ears ​ albeit in this case, with dirty fingernails and a sportcoat. 1 According to assassination literature and testimony it has long been established that no genuine Secret Service agents were in Dealey Plaza until later in the afternoon of November 22, 1963. Surprisingly, not only were there no Secret Service agents assigned to or stationed behind the grassy knoll area, but there were no FBI or other federal agents, or Dallas Police Officers stationed there either. This fact suggests phony Secret Service agents were in Dealey Plaza, and that perhaps they were there to help the assassins escape.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • November at the Carousel
    November at the Carousel Libretto An Opera in Three Acts Te xtand music by Peter Billam ©Peter J Billam, 1999 This libretto may be freely photocopied, and redistributed in paper form. It may not be redistributed in electronic form, and all other rights, such as those of live performance, recording and broadcast, remain reserved by the librettist and composer,Peter Billam, GPO Box 669, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia. This edition 26 April 2006. http://www.pjb.com.au Jack Ruby, 24 Nov 1963 pjb.com.au November at the Carousel Orchestra Strings : First and second violins, violas, violoncelli, basses. Woodwind : Flute (doubling piccolo), twooboes (one doubling cor anglais), two clarinets in Bb (one doubling Eb), twobasoons (one doubling con- tra). Brass : Tw o trumpets, twotrombones, twohorns in F. Saxophones : Saxophone quartet; soprano, alto, tenor and baritone. Percussion : Piano, one percussionist (snaredrum, triangle, 2 timpani). Scenes Act One Scene One Jack Ruby'soffice at the Carousel Club Scene Two On stage at the Carousel Club Scene Three At table at the Carousel Club Scene Four The same table after closing time Act Two Scene One The Grassy Knoll Scene Two The Texas Cinema Scene Three Inside Olsen'sCar Scene Four ACorridor in the Police Station Scene Five The Garage in the Police Station Act Three Scene One Jack Ruby'strial Scene Two The Warren Commission Hearing ©Peter J Billam 1999 www.pjb.com.au 2 November at the Carousel November at the Carousel Cast Rose Cheramie One of Jack Ruby'sworking girls, Mezzo. Bodyguard Works for Jack Ruby,Latin-american, Bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas (1978 TV Series)
    Dallas (1978 TV series) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the original 1978–1991 television series. For the sequel, see Dallas (2012 TV series). Dallas is a long-running American prime time television soap opera that aired from April 2, 1978, to May 3, 1991, on CBS. The series revolves around a wealthy and feuding Texan family, the Ewings, who own the independent oil company Ewing Oil and the cattle-ranching land of Southfork. The series originally focused on the marriage of Bobby Ewing and Pamela Barnes, whose families were sworn enemies with each other. As the series progressed, oil tycoon J.R. Ewing grew to be the show's main character, whose schemes and dirty business became the show's trademark.[1] When the show ended in May 1991, J.R. was the only character to have appeared in every episode. The show was famous for its cliffhangers, including the Who shot J.R.? mystery. The 1980 episode Who Done It remains the second highest rated prime-time telecast ever.[2] The show also featured a "Dream Season", in which the entirety of the ninth season was revealed to have been a dream of Pam Ewing's. After 14 seasons, the series finale "Conundrum" aired in 1991. The show had a relatively ensemble cast. Larry Hagman stars as greedy, scheming oil tycoon J.R. Ewing, stage/screen actressBarbara Bel Geddes as family matriarch Miss Ellie and movie Western actor Jim Davis as Ewing patriarch Jock, his last role before his death in 1981. The series won four Emmy Awards, including a 1980 Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series win for Bel Geddes.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for the Bond-Yield Conundrum by Tao Wu
    VOL. 3, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2008­­ EconomicLetter Insights from the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF Dallas Accounting For the Bond-Yield Conundrum by Tao Wu Long-term interest rates tend to rise as monetary policymakers increase This conundrum has short-term interest rates. This relationship didn’t hold, however, during the recent prompted a great deal of U.S. monetary policy tightening cycle. Between June 2004 and June 2006, the Fed- discussion regarding both eral Open Market Committee increased the federal funds rate 17 times—going its magnitude and the from 1 percent to 5.25 percent. Yet, long-term interest rates declined or stayed flat factors behind it. However, until early 2006. a compelling and broadly This divergence between short- and long-term interest rates caught many accepted explanation has economists, investors and central bankers by surprise. In his Feb. 16, 2005, con- yet to be reached. gressional testimony, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan charac- terized the behavior of long-term interest rates since June 2004: “For the moment, the broadly unanticipated behavior of world bond markets remains a conundrum. Bond price movements may be a short-term aberration, but it will be some time before we are able to better judge the forces underlying recent experience.” Since then, this conundrum has tinctly different pattern. During the 12 prompted a great deal of discussion months following the initial federal regarding both its magnitude and the funds rate increase, this long-term factors behind it. However, a compel- bond yield declined by about 80 basis ling and broadly accepted explanation points as short-term rates rose rap- has yet to be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK by Gerald Posner: a Preliminary Critique by Martin Shackelford
    Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK by Gerald Posner: A Preliminary Critique by Martin Shackelford DEJA VU: In 1964, the Warren Commission, after 8 months of studying the JFK assassination, published a book purporting to solve the case; they got virtually uncritical media support and coverage, but they were wrong. In 1966, after three years of studying the JFK case, Mark Lane published a book purporting to solve it; he got mountains of media coverage, but he was wrong. In 1980, after 17 years of studying the case, David Lifton published a book purporting to solve it; Time magazine devoted two pages to his book, and he got a lot of television coverage, but he was wrong. In 1993, after 2 years of study, Gerald Posner published a book purporting to finally resolve the issues in the case, and US. News & World Report devoted 27 pages in a special issue on the book, and he is getting a lot of television coverage. He, too, is wrong, but the media seems fonder of his version than Lifton's: he says the Warren Commission was right. As he later notes, "An increasing amount of published work is a dangerous mixture of good information with a liberal dose of falsehoods. Sifting out the truth is increasingly difficult for those not well versed in the facts."1 Unfortunately, the same may be said of his own book. BLURBS: Posners book is highly praised on the dust jacket by Tom Wicker, a longtime Warren Commission apologist who in 1979 wrote an introduction to the House Select Committee on Assassinations report (NY.
    [Show full text]
  • Am2021-Program.Pdf
    ASA is pleased to acknowledge the supporting partners of the 116th Virtual Annual Meeting 116th Virtual Annual Meeting Emancipatory Sociology: Rising to the Du Boisian Challenge 2021 Program Committee Aldon D. Morris, President, Northwestern University Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, Vice President, University of Southern California Nancy López, Secretary-Treasurer, University of New Mexico Joyce M. Bell, University of Chicago Hae Yeon Choo, University of Toronto Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, Brown University Jeff Goodwin, New York University Tod G. Hamilton, Princeton University Mignon R. Moore, Barnard College Pamela E. Oliver, University of Wisconsin-Madison Brittany C. Slatton, Texas Southern University Earl Wright, Rhodes College Land Acknowledgement and Recognition Before we can talk about sociology, power, inequality, we, the American Sociological Association (ASA), acknowledge that academic institutions, indeed the nation-state itself, was founded upon and continues to enact exclusions and erasures of Indigenous Peoples. This acknowledgement demonstrates a commitment to beginning the process of working to dismantle ongoing legacies of settler colonialism, and to recognize the hundreds of Indigenous Nations who continue to resist, live, and uphold their sacred relations across their lands. We also pay our respect to Indigenous elders past, present, and future and to those who have stewarded this land throughout the generations TABLE OF CONTENTS d Welcome from the ASA President..............................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]