DOCSLIB.ORG

Isle of Dogs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Isle of Dogs Sie ISLE OF DOGS FilmCenter Fri: 11:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 2:00, 2:20, 4:45, 4:30, 7:00, 9:45, 10:00 Sat: 11:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 2:00, 4:30, 7:00, 9:45, 10:00 Sun: 11:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 2:00, 4:45, 7:00, 9:45, 10:00 Mon: 2:00, 2:20, 4:30, 4:45, 7:00, 7:30, 9:45, 10:00 Tue: 2:00, 2:20, 4:30, 4:45, 7:00, 9:45, 10:00 APRIL 13 19 Wed: 2:00, 2:20, 4:30, 4:45, 7:30, 9:45, 10:00 Thu: 2:00, 2:20, 4:45, 7:30, 9:45, 10:00 APRIL 10-15 SOLD OUT! DEATH OF STALIN SHORTS Fri: 11:10 AM, 1:50, 4:20 Sat: 11:10 AM, 1:50, 4:20, 9:30 PACKAGE Sun: 11:10 AM, 1:50, 4:20 Mon: 1:50, 4:20, 9:30 SATURDAY 1:30PM Tue - Thu: 1:50, 4:20, 7:10, 9:30 FREE FOR GREAT MEMBERS! ADAPTATIONS SOLD FILM + LECTURE SERIES OUT! BOOK NIGHT BLUE SKY COMES ON TO FRIDAY 7:00PM FRIDAY 7:30PM MOVIE THIS IS ADAPTATION (Film Only) Tue: 7:00 PM HOME SATURDAY 4:00PM THE RAPE CZECH THE DIVINE OF RECY ORDER TAYLOR THAT FILM FRIDAY 7:00PM SATURDAY 7:00PM FILM FESTIVAL MILADA THE Thu: 7:00 PM 20 WEEKS DARK MONEY SOUNDING SUNDAY 2:00PM SUNDAY 4:00PM SUNDAY 7:00PM Sie FilmCenter 2510 East Colfax Next door to Tattered Cover and Twist & Shout DenverFilm.org 303 - 595 - FILM NO SEATING 15 MINUTES AFTER SHOWTIME - PLEASE SILENCE YOUR PHONES - NO REFUNDS discounted tickets! Isle of Dogs 101min The latest from quirky filmmaker Wes Anderson takes us to a dystopian future Japan discounted snacks! where, by executive decree, all the canine pets of Megasaki City are exiled to a vast garbage-dump called Trash Island. 12-year-old Atari sets off alone in a miniature double the fun! Junior-Turbo Prop and flies across the river in search of his bodyguard-dog, Spots. There, with the assistance of a pack of newly-found mongrel friends, he begins an epic sundays - wednesdays journey that will decide the fate and future of the entire Prefecture. starting for the 9:00 screenings The Death of Stalin 107min $3 small pcn TICKET PRICES The one-liners fly as fast as political fortunes fall in this uproarious, wickedly irreverent satire from Armando Iannucci (Veep, In the Loop). Moscow, 1953: when tyrannical $3 GA $9.50 AT small soda dictator Joseph Stalin drops dead, his parasitic cronies square off in a frantic power THE Sie Members $6.00 FilmCenter $3 select bes struggle to be the next Soviet leader. Among the contenders are the dweeby Georgy Malenkov (Jeffrey Tambor), the wily Nikita Khrushchev (Steve Buscemi), and the *Excludes all film festivals and special events. sadistic secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria (Simon Russell Beale). FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU 11:00a 11:00a 11:00a 2:00p 2:00p 2:00p 2:00p CZECH APRIL 11:10a 11:30a 11:30a 2:20p 2:20p 2:20p 2:20p ISLE OF DOGS 2:00p 2:00p 2:00p 4:30p 4:30p 4:30p 4:45p 19 - 22 2:20p 4:30p 4:45p 4:45p 4:45p 4:45p 7:30p THAT FILM 4:45p 7:00p 7:00p 7:00p 7:00p 7:30p 9:45p FILM FESTIVAL 2018 4:30p 9:45p 9:45p 7:30p 9:45p 9:45p 10:00p 7:00p 10:00p 10:00p 9:45p 10:00p 10:00p 9:45p 10:00p 10:00p 11:10a 11:10a 11:10a 1:50p 1:50p 1:50p 1:50p DEATH OF STALIN 1:50p 1:50p 1:50p 4:20p 4:20p 4:20p 4:20p 4:20p 4:20p 4:20p 9:30p 9:30p 9:30p 9:30p 9:30p ADAPTATION 7:00p 5 Czech films CZECH THAT FILM FESTIVAL MILADA 7:00p WOMEN+FILM FESTIVAL BLUE SKY 7:00p NIGHT COMES ON 7:30p SHORTS PACKAGE 1:30p THIS IS HOME 4:00p THE DIVINE ORDER 6:30p RAPE OF RECY TAYLOR 7:00p 20 WEEKS 2:00p DARK MONEY 4:00p THE SOUNDING 7:00p Coming soon! APR 20 APR 27 MAY 11 MAY 4 ZAMA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Death of Stalin’ Almost a Soviet Spin on ‘Veep’
    CHICAGOLAWBULLETIN.COM FRIDAY, MARCH 30, 2018 ® Volume 164, No. 63 Serving Chicago’s legal community for 163 years ‘Death of Stalin’ almost a Soviet spin on ‘Veep’ inutes before a which was not as strongly word - Stalin, Beria was keeper and cre - live-broadcast ed as in the movie. ator of Stalin’s lists of those to be Mozart concerto is There was a late-night orches - tortured, exiled or sent to the gu - about to end, the tra round-up; Stalin did lay dying lags. He was a genius at mass ex - Radio Moscow sta - on the floor for hours because his ecution, ghastly humiliation and Mtion manager receives a telephone guards were too fearful to enter perverse sexual exploitation. call from the office of Supreme his room after hearing him fall; REBECCA Iannucci says he began Commander Josef Stal in. The and the Politburo members de - mulling a movie idea about a fic - premier loved the performance, liberated at length whether to L. F ORD tional contemporary dictator says the voice on the other end of call a doctor as Stalin expired, after ending his four-year run as the line, and requests that a fearing the consequences of call - the creator of the Emmy Award- recording of the concert be sent ing the “wrong” doctor. Rebecca L. Ford is counsel at Scharf winning HBO series “Veep.” to him immedi ately. Writer and director Armando Banks Marmor LLC, and concentrates While pondering this prospect, There’s a problem. The con - Iannucci didn’t ask the American her practice on complex litigation, he was given a copy of Fabien cert wasn’t recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • The KGB in Kremlin Politics
    FINAL REPORT TO NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : THE KGB IN KREMLIN POLITIC S AUTHOR : Jeremy R. Azrael Rand Corporation/UCLA CONTRACTOR : Rand/UCLA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Jeremy R. Azrael COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 801-4 DATE : September, 198 8 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . CONTENT S PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i v INTRODUCTION 1 THE SECRET POLICE AND THE ELIMINATION OF BERIA 4 THE SECRET POLICE IN THE MALENKOV-KHRUSHCHEV STRUGGLE 6 THE KGB AND THE " ANTI-PARTY GROUP " 1 1 THE KGB AND " THE ZHUKOV AFFAIR " 1 6 THE REPLACEMENT OF SEROV 2 0 CHAIRMAN SHELEPIN 2 2 THE FALL OF SHELEPIN 2 7 THE 1967 SETTLEMENT 3 0 THE DOWNFALLS OF AKHUNDOV AND SHELEST 3 3 THE RISE OF ANDROPOV 3 7 THE KGB AND THE BREZHNEV - ANDROPOV SUCCESSION 4 3 THE INTERREGNUM 4 6 THE CHEBRIKOV - GORBACHEV ALLIANCE 5 0 THE BREAKDOWN OF THE CHEBRIKOV - GORBACHEV ALLIANCE 5 3 CONCLUSION 6 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY WORKS CITED 68 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S This report has been prepared in fulfillment of a contract betwee n the RAND-UCLA Center for the Study of Soviet International Behavior an d the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . The autho r is indebted to both of these organizations for generous financial an d moral support . Sincere thanks also go to , Lilita Dzirkals and Te d Karasik, for their expert research assistance ; to Valerie Bernstein, to r her devoted secretarial services ; to Julia Azrael, for her help as a proofreader and editor ; and to Frank Fukuyama, Harry Gelman, and othe r colleagues who gave me the benefit of their critical comments an d suggestions on a draft version of the text .
    [Show full text]
  • Film: the Death of Stalin
    FILM: THE DEATH OF STALIN FDG RATING: 3.2 JJJ Film Discussion Group (FDG) Scale is 1-5 (5 is best) Armando Iannucci: director/co-writer Steve Buscemi: actor, Nikita Khrushchev Simon Russell Beale: actor, Lavrentiy Beria Jeffrey Tambor: actor, Georgy Malenkov DATE: April 22, 2018 DISCUSSION SUMMARY: THE DEATH OF STALIN The Death of Stalin is a clever, raucous political lampoon about bumbling Moscow bureaucrats, backstabbing their way to the top of the heap in an elaborate frantic power struggle to become the next Soviet leader when their tyrannical dictator, Joseph Stalin. drops dead. Among the contenders are sadistic secret police chief Beria who, accompanied by babbling CP Central Committee bigwig Malenkov (Arrested Development’s Jeffrey Tambor), take charge of the situation. Moscow Party Head Nikita Khrushchev (Steve Buscemi) arrives with the rest of the Committee, except for Foreign Minister Molotov, whom Stalin added to his list of enemies the previous night. If these names ring a bell and you can form an historical/political context for the actions that followed, you will have a greater appreciation for the satirical humor that crowds the entire film. The rest of us were at a disadvantage and felt that we were missing a lot of the clever parody and double entendre. But it was just so entertaining, most us laughed out loud anyway. No one really knows what happened behind those heavy red curtains (Wikipedia’s explanation of each character’s role is very helpful) so director/co-writer Armando Iannucci lets the slapstick roll as the farce unfolds while funeral arrangements are made and Stalin’s unstable son Vasily and daughter Svetlana are dealt with.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Famine in Ukraine from 1930 to 1933
    THE GREAT FAMINE IN UKRAINE FROM 1930 TO 1933: AN INSTRUMENT OF NATIONALISM THEN AND TODAY By Helen Fisun Submitted to Professors Linda Gerstein and Paul Smith In partial fulfillment of the requirements of History 400: Senior Thesis Seminar 22 April 2011 ABSTRACT The Great Famine in the Soviet Union lasted between the years of 1930 and 1933. The devastation peaked in winter of 1932 and continued throughout 1933. Statistics which accurately represent the tragedy are impossible to find due to Stalin's deliberate erasure of records. These records would have depicted a scene of mass murder. It has been estimated that the Famine took around eight to ten million lives. Five to six million of these citizens belonged to the Ukrainian SSR. This occurred because of Stalin's direct targeting of the Ukrainian state in order to industrialize and modernize the Soviet Union in an unrealistic time frame. Thus, for maximum results, he instituted a system of collective farming throughout the USSR which most severely affected the peasants of the Ukrainian country side. When the peasants rebelled, refusing to be manipulated by the Soviet Regime, Stalin punished the peasantry for their defiance by instituting a man made famine through the exportation of harvested crops out of Ukraine. Furthermore, he prohibited the provision of aid, as well as the emigration of Ukrainian peasants from the countryside. This resulted in the mass starvation of the Ukrainian peasantry, killing millions of innocent victims More recently, the topic of Holodomor, the Famine in Ukraine, has resurfaced as a politically polarizing issue. Russia refuses to accept its role in the mass murder of Ukrainian people, while Ukraine asserts the Russian role as an intentional exploiter of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE of CRIMEAN TATARS Stalin Dönemi Sürgün Politikası Sonrası Bir Mücadele Ve Tepki Örneği: Kırım Tatarları
    Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi / Journal of Turkish World Studies, Cilt: VI, Sayı 2, Sayfa: 411-422, İZMİR 2006. THE STRUGGLE AND THE RESPONSE IN STALIN’S DEPORTATION POLICY: THE CASE OF CRIMEAN TATARS Stalin Dönemi Sürgün Politikası Sonrası Bir Mücadele ve Tepki Örneği: Kırım Tatarları Seçil ÖRAZ* Özet 1937–1949 yılları arasında SSCB çatısı altındaki sekiz topluluktan (Volga Almanları, Karaçaylılar, Kalmuklar, Çeçen-İnguşlar, Balkarlar, Ahıska Türkleri ve Kırım Tatarları) yaklaşık iki buçuk milyon kişi Stalin döneminde çıkarılan bir kararla vatanlarından çıkarılarak Orta Asya’ya sürgüne gönderildiler. Kararın gerekçesi bu halkların II. Dünya Savaşı boyunca düşmana yardımcı olmak suretiyle vatana ihanet etmeleriydi. Ne var ki bu suçlama herhangi bir araştırma, mahkeme ya da hükümle desteklenmedi. Kararın adilliği hakkındaki tartışmalar bir yana bırakılacak olsa bile Stalin döneminde gerçekleşen bu sürgünler Stalin’in “milletler politikasının” en saldırgan ve Sovyet tarihinin de en trajik kısımlarından biri olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Aradan geçen yarım yüzyılı aşkın zamana rağmen sürgünün etkileri sürülen halklarda hâlâ hissedilmektedir. Bu anlamda Kırım Tatarları da 1944 yılının Mayıs ayında kimliklerinin bir parçası olan Kırım yarımadasından sürülerek Orta Asya’ya gönderildiler. Bu sürgün, Kırım Tatarlarınca daha çok Stalin ve Stalin sonrası Sovyet rejiminin ulusal miraslarını, kimliklerini ve anavatanlarına olan bağlılıklarını bastırma ve siyasi, ekonomik, askeri önemi nedeniyle vazgeçemedikleri Kırım’ı Slavlaştırma yolunda attıkları
    [Show full text]
  • Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945
    Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945-49 LAYCOCK, Joanne <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-3303> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/16292/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version LAYCOCK, Joanne (2017). Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945-49. Kritika : Exploration in Russian and Eurasian History, 18 (3), 511-537. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Belongings: People and Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations 1945 - 1949 Jo Laycock Introduction On July 9th 1947 the Pobeda docked in Batumi carrying 2509 items of hand baggage and 2548 items of hold baggage. It was followed a few weeks later by the Chukotka, which carried another 2700 items of hand baggage and a further 3408 items of hold baggage.1 The owners of this cargo were diaspora Armenians from communities in Greece and the Middle East who had responded to a Soviet invitation to repatriate to their ‘homeland’, Soviet Armenia. By the time the scheme came to an abrupt end in 1949 almost 90,000 Armenians had gathered up their belongings and embarked on similar voyages toward the Republic. 2 The arrival of the Pobeda and the Chukotka in the USSR occurred against a backdrop of post-war population movement on a vast scale as prisoners of war, evacuees, forced laborers, conscript soldiers and many others sought ways and means to go home.3 Yet the Armenian repatriations were distinct from this context of movement in important ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Media and the Framing of a Cold War Enemy, 1949-1962
    American Dreams and Red Nightmares: Popular Media and the Framing of a Cold War Enemy, 1949-1962 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Meredith K. Hohe November 2010 © 2010 Meredith K. Hohe. All rights reserved. 1 This thesis titled American Dreams and Red Nightmares: Popular Media and the Framing of a Cold War Enemy, 1949-1962 by MEREDITH K. HOHE has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by _______________________________________________ Katherine Jellison Professor of History ________________________________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 2 Abstract HOHE, MEREDITH K., M.A., November 2010, History American Dreams and Red Nightmares: Popular Media and the Framing of a Cold War Enemy, 1949-1962 (131 pp.) Director of Thesis: Katherine Jellison The visual image of the Soviet Union during the early Cold War period played a significant role in contributing to average Americans‟ understanding of their new national nemesis. However, while films, television, and popular magazines all helped to frame understanding of the Soviet threat, the portrait of the enemy they displayed was not a simplistic narrative of enemy demonization. Popular media both warned against and mocked the Soviet communist leadership. They portrayed the Soviet military and forces of scientific and technological production as both a leviathan of epic proportions and a lie built upon thievery and espionage. In focusing on the threat posed by Soviet agents working undercover within the United States, visual media outlined the danger posed but also mitigated the threat with images of the covert agents rounded up time after time by a triumphant F.B.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Armando Iannucci, Dir., the Death of Stalin, with Steve Buscemi, Simon Russell Beale, and Jeffrey Tambor
    Armando Iannucci, dir., The Death of Stalin, with Steve Buscemi, Simon Russell Beale, and Jeffrey Tambor. (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: Gaumont, Main Journey, Quad Productions, France Cinema, La Cie Cinématographique, Panache Productions, AFPI, eOne Films, 2017), film.1 With the specter of Russian meddling on the minds of some of the most powerful figures in Washington, one would be hard pressed to find a director more fitting or a film more ironically relevant than Armando Iannucci’s The Death of Stalin. Based on the French graphic novel, La mort de Staline by2 Fabien Nury and Thierry Robin, the creator of HBO’s Veep hilariously reimagines the power struggle to become the next Soviet leader in the wake of the dictator’s sudden demise. Centered around the planning and execution of the funeral, Iannucci and co-screenwriter David Schneider’s political satire manages to portray both the abject brutality and hilarious pitfalls of Stalin’s totalitarian policies, aptly dubbing their movie, “A Comedy of Terrors.” The film opens in March 1953 to a beautifully tragic symphony played before a repressively docile crowd. The audience is quickly introduced to Stalin’s brutal control over his nation in the form of an impossible request: produce a recorded version of a performance that was broadcasted live. Stalin rules with an iron fist, demanding complete unanimity from his committee in all decisions, from systematic purges to the regimented delegation of his staff. So, when he suffers a massive stroke alone in his room, it’s those same rules and regulations that ultimately lead to his death.
    [Show full text]
  • SUGGESTED READINGS for Phd QUALIFYING EXAM in SOVIET HISTORY
    Benjamin Nathans University of Pennsylvania Department of History SUGGESTED READINGS FOR PhD QUALIFYING EXAM IN SOVIET HISTORY Note to users: this bibliography is meant to serve as a resource for graduate students compiling reading lists in preparation for their PhD oral exam in the field of Soviet history. It does not pretend to be comprehensive, especially as regards journal articles. Nor does it reflect an expectation that the prepared student will have read everything listed below (which would be virtually impossible). Rather, it is a starting point from which to pick and choose, and upon which to build. The list consists of three groups of works: 1. those designed to help orient you on the macro and micro levels 2. those organized according to specific periods of Soviet history 3. those organized according to specific themes There is some overlap between groups 2 and 3. Within each sub-topic, works are listed alphabetically by author’s last name. You can move from section to section by searching for the next asterix (*). My goal has been to list the most relevant and up-to-date works as of 2009 in the major European languages. Inevitably, there will be lacunae, errors, and typos. I would appreciate having these brought to my attention so that I can improve future editions of this list: [email protected] Happy hunting. BN Nathans/Soviet Field/p.2 ORIENTATION: Reference Works Atlases Overviews of Soviet History, 20th-Century Russia, Socialism/Communism State of the Field CHRONOLOGICAL UNITS: Pre-Revolutionary Period First World
    [Show full text]
  • Change and Continuity in Uzbekistan, 1991-2016
    Change and Continuity in Uzbekistan, 1991-2016 S. Frederick Starr zbekistan has entered a dynamic new phase of development. The Uobvious motivating factor is the transition in presidential leadership, following the death of Founding President Islam Karimov on September 2, 2016, and the election of Shavkat Mirziyoyev on December 4, 2016. It is easy, perhaps all too easy, to attribute the change simply to the differences between these two leaders. Some international observers who were critical of what preceded the present changes see today’s developments as a sharp break with the past, a radical transformation along fundamentally different lines than what preceded them, a welcome opening to a more market-based and participatory system. Others, who also have little good to say about what came earlier, are quick to conclude that less has changed than meets the eye, and that the many recent reforms are mainly for show. But beyond these are a third and more credible group, who applaud the new directions and wish them all success, but perceive them not as a revolutionary break with the past but as the logical next steps after what came before, and the culmination of Uzbekistan’s post-independence development. It cannot be denied that the differences between Uzbekistan’s two post-independence leaders are striking. Mr. Karimov, who was 53 when he was named Uzbekistan’s first president, had spent two decades working for the State Planning Committee of the USSR, known as “Gosplan,” the powerful agency that was responsible for developing detailed plans for every sector of the state-controlled economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 278 When the Cold War Did Not End: the Soviet Peace Offensive of 1953 and the American Response Jeffrey Brooks
    #278 When the Cold War did not End: The Soviet Peace Offensive of 1953 and the American Response Jeffrey Brooks Jeffrey Brooks is a professor in the Depar~ ment o(: History at Johns Hopkins University aaC: a Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The at-:.thor would like to thank Karen Brooks, Georgiy Cherniavskiy, Daun van Ee, Sheila Fitzpatrick, Louis Galambos, John Higham, Anna Krylova, Lary May, Yale Richmond, Blair ::.\.uble, Ron Suny, Ruud van Dijk, and Ron Walters for :heir helpful comments. Dr. Brooks presented early versions of this paper at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association in Chicago in January 2000, a joint seminar of the Kennan Institute and the Cold War Interna­ tional History Project at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., and the Russian Stuciies Workshcp at the Unive:sity of Chicago. The Kennan Institute Named in honor of Ambassdor Kennan's relative, George Kennan ~~~he Elder," a nineteentn­ century explo::er of Russia and Siberia, the Kennan Institute is commited to improving AmericaE expertise and !<now ledge about the former Soviet Union. It is one of severai. area studies programs of the Woodrow Wilson Center. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars The Center is ~he nation's living memorial to Woodrow Wilson, president of the United States from 1913 to 1921. Created by law in 1968, the Center is Washington, D.C.'s only independent, wide-ranging institute for advanced study where vita~ current issues and their deep historical background are explored through research and dialogue. Visit the Center on the WorldWide Web at http:/ /wwics.si.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Deconstruction of the Myth of the Moscow Metro: an Analysis of Metro Images from Georgiy Daneliya's Films
    Construction and Deconstruction of the Myth of the Moscow Metro: An Analysis of Metro Images from Georgiy Daneliya’s Films Construction and Deconstruction of the Myth of the Moscow Metro: An Analysis of Metro Images from Georgiy Daneliya’s Films Akiko HONDA film, Nastya (1993), in the same station from a differ- Introduction ent viewpoint after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The Moscow Metro (Metro) opened its first rail- It can be considered that these two films clearly reflect way line with 13 stations in 1935. Construction of the shifts in discourse about the Metro. Thus, in this paper, Metro was included in Joseph Stalin’s Moscow recon- I will first address the formative process for the struction project and by the end of the 1950s, the basic “underground palaces” and its influence on Metro radial and circular routes had been constructed. At that images in Soviet films between the 1930s and 1950s. time, Metro construction was significant not only as a Then, I will compare depictions of the Metro in functional urban transit system but also as a symbolic Daneliya’s I Walk around Moscow with those images enterprise such as construction of the White Sea–Bal- formed in the Stalin era to demonstrate why Daneli- tic Canal and hydroelectric power plants, and polar ya’s Metro images were epoch making. Finally, I will expeditions, i.e., “conquests of nature.” More over, the clarify how the director reveals and deconstructs a Metro stations were magnificently decorated with mechanism that generated and perpetuated the myth of chandeliers, reliefs, mosaics, and statues and began to the Moscow Metro, i.e., a system of glorifying partic- be called “underground palaces” or “palaces for the ular places through analysis of Nastya.
    [Show full text]