Zero Tolerance: Policing a Free Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Experience of the Second Town Planning Act, 1919 to 1933 Thesis
Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The scope and purpose of town planning in Britain : The experience of the second town planning act, 1919 to 1933 Thesis How to cite: Gunby, Derek S. (1987). The scope and purpose of town planning in Britain : The experience of the second town planning act, 1919 to 1933. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1987 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000dea6 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk 31 DXßoei5 iisw VNRESTRICT"-D TOE SCOPE & PURPOSE OF TOWN PLANNING IN BRITAIN The experience of the second Town Planning Act, 1919 to 1933 VOLUME I A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Open University by Derek S. Gunby B. A. (Hons), Dip. T. P., M. R. T. P. I. May, 1987. Atithor'sflumber"- tlDk 1070 Tate of SLnbmlsslal,:I2th Mauý 198 Tateq Avýrd:i$ºý Ast ýi9sT ABSTRACT Title: The Scope and Purpose of Town Planning in Britain: The experience of the Second Town Planning Act, 1919 to 1933 The broad aim of this study is to develop a greater understanding of modern British Town Planning by examining, in depth, its operation during the 1920s and early 1930s, i. -
ORTHODONTIC COMMISSIONING INTENTIONS (Final - Sept 2018)
CUMBRIA & NORTH EAST - ORTHODONTIC COMMISSIONING INTENTIONS (Final - Sept 2018) Contract size Contract Size Units of Indicative Name of Contract Lot Required premise(s) locaton for contract Orthodontic Activity patient (UOAs) numbers Durham Central Accessible location(s) within Central Durham (ie Neville's Cross/Elvet/Gilesgate) 14,100 627 Durham North West Accessible location(s) within North West Durham (ie Stanley/Tanfield/Consett North) 8,000 356 Bishop Auckland Accessible location(s) within Bishop Auckland 10,000 444 Darlington Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Darlington 9,000 400 Hartlepool Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Hartlepool 8,500 378 Middlesbrough Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Middlesbrough 10,700 476 Redcar and Cleveland Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Redcar & Cleveland, (ie wards of Dormanstown, West Dyke, Longbeck or 9,600 427 St Germains) Stockton-on-Tees Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Stockton on Tees) 16,300 724 Gateshead Accessible location(s) within the Borough of Gateshead 10,700 476 South Tyneside Accessible location(s) within the Borough of South Tyneside 7,900 351 Sunderland North Minimum of two sites - 1 x accesible location in Washington, and 1 other, ie Castle, Redhill or Southwick wards 9,000 400 Sunderland South Accessible location(s) South of River Wear (City Centre location, ie Millfield, Hendon, St Michael's wards) 16,000 711 Northumberland Central Accessible location(s) within Central Northumberland, ie Ashington. 9,000 400 Northumberland -
Zero Tolerance Policing
RESEARCHING CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERIES Zero tolerance policing Maurice Punch Zero tolerance policing Maurice Punch First published in Great Britain in 2007 by The Policy Press The Policy Press University of Bristol Fourth Floor, Beacon House Queen’s Road Bristol BS8 1QU UK Tel no +44 (0)117 331 4054 Fax no +44 (0)117 331 4093 E-mail [email protected] www.policypress.org.uk © Maurice Punch 2007 ISBN 978 1 84742 055 8 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this report is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this report has been requested. The right of Maurice Punch to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with Sections 77 and 78 of the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. The statements and opinions contained within this publication are solely those of the author and not of the University of Bristol or The Policy Press. The University of Bristol and The Policy Press disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any material published in this publication. The Policy Press works to counter discrimination on grounds of gender, race, disability, age and sexuality. Cover image courtesy of iStockphoto® Cover design by Qube Design Associates, Bristol Printed in Great Britain by Latimer Trend, Plymouth To the -
M 2006-093 in the Matter of the Arbitration
NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD Case No. IA 2006-24; M 2006-093 In the Matter of the Arbitration OPINION - between- THE CITY OF NEW YORK PUBLIC - and- ARBITRATION PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION PANEL CHAIR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC. Pursuant to Section 209.4 of the New York Civil Service Law ("Taylor Law"), on July 11, 2007 the New York State Public Employment Relations Board ("PERB") designated the undersigned Public Arbitration Panel in the above dispute between the City of New York ("City") and the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. ("PBA"): Susan T. Mackenzie, Esq., Public Panel Member and Chair; Carole O'Blenes, Esq., Public Employer Panel Member; and, Jay W. Waks, Esq., Employee Organization Panel Member. By accepting appointment to this Public Arbitration Panel, the Panel Members agreed to "make a just and reasonable determination on the matters in dispute" between the parties over the terms of their collective bargaining agreement for the contract term, August 1, 2004-July 31, 2006. Pre-hearing conferences were held on August 27, 2007 and September 17, 2007, and hearings on November 6,27,28 and 29, 2007, December 12, 13 and 14,2007, and January 7,8,9, 10 and 11, 2008. A transcript of the hearings was recorded and all witnesses gave sworn testimony. The parties filed pre-hearing briefs on October 22, 2007, post-hearing briefs on February 20, 2008 and reply briefs on March 11, 2008. The Panel met in executive session on March 19, 2008, April 29, 2008, May 9, 2008 and May 19,2008. -
Tees Valley Strategic Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Plan
Tees Valley Strategic Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Plan Version No: One Issue Date: Tuesday, 04 September 2018 Non-Technical Summary Introduction This is the non-technical summary of the Environmental Report for the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Tees Valley Waste Partnership review of the Tees Valley Joint Waste Management Strategy (JWMS). The Strategy review provides the objectives, policies, actions and targets to be delivered relating to Local Authority Collected Waste (LACW) management from 2020-2035. The Tees Valley Waste Partnership The Tees Valley Waste Partnership comprises all the local authorities in Tees Valley including Darlington Borough Council, Hartlepool Borough Council, Middlesbrough Council, Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, and Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council. Unitary Authorities (UAs) These councils are responsible for waste collection, treatment and disposal within their Boroughs and are classified as Unitary Authorities. This SEA involves a review of key central and local Government plans and strategies that have the potential to influence the management of waste, as a basis for considering the appropriateness of the Tees Valley JWMS. The assessment also considers the local environmental, social and economic context of Tees Valley insofar as it is relevant to the waste management services and their impacts. This is described as the Baseline within the SEA. The key parts of the draft Tees Valley JWMS are assessed against criteria, known as SEA sustainability objectives, to ensure -
Police Chiefs, Prosecutors, Sheriffs, Attorneys General
We represent over 200 members — police chiefs, prosecutors, sheriffs, attorneys general, and correctional officials — from all 50 states, dedicated to urging the country to reduce incarceration while reducing crime. MISSION STATEMENT As current and former leaders of the law enforcement community — police chiefs, sheriffs, district and state’s attorneys, U.S. Attorneys, attorneys general, correctional officials, and other leaders — protecting public safety is our foremost priority. From experience and through data-driven and innovative practices, we know the country can reduce crime while also reducing unnecessary arrests, prosecutions, and incarceration. We can also reduce recidivism and strengthen relationships with communities. With the goal of building a smarter, stronger, and fairer criminal justice system, we join together to urge a change in laws and practices to reduce incarceration while continuing to keep our country safe. LEADERSHIP • Ronal W. Serpas, Executive Director, Law Enforcement Leaders; Former Police Superintendent, New Orleans, Louisiana; Former Police Chief, Nashville, Tennessee; Former Police Chief, State Patrol, Washington • Taryn A. Merkl, Senior Counsel, Law Enforcement Leaders; Former Assistant U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of New York EXECUTIVE BOARD • Hassan Aden, Federal Consent Decree Monitor, Cleveland, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland; Former Executive Fellow, Police Foundation; Former Police Chief, Greenville, North Carolina • Mark Earley, Former Attorney General, Virginia; Former President and CEO, Prison Fellowship • Walter Holton, Former U.S. Attorney, Middle District of North Carolina • James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, New York; Former Undersecretary for Enforcement, Department of the Treasury; Former Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, Southern District of New York • Brett Tolman, Former U.S. Attorney, District of Utah • Cyrus R. -
Look Inside for Your Theatre & Cinema Guide
Produced by Hartlepool Council and wholly funded from advertising Autumn 2016 www.hartlepool.gov.uk /hartlepoolcouncil @HpoolCouncil LOOK INSIDE FOR YOUR THEATRE & CINEMA GUIDE Delight at return of Free swims scheme SHOW makes a splash HOME hospital services HARTLEPOOL Council’s popular free swimming scheme for local youngsters OPENING SENIOR Hartlepool councillors have welcomed advocating that over the summer holidays has once the return of some services to Hartlepool’s main Councillor Christopher these urgent care Akers-Belcher, Leader again proved to be a huge success. SOON! hospital site and say that the battle will go on services needed to of Hartlepool Council For the fourth successive year, for others to return. be commissioned children were able to benefit from free The local Clinical Commissioning Group as a single service and that they should be swims at the town’s Mill House Leisure (CCG) recently confirmed that the new delivered from the Holdforth Road hospital site. Centre and free transport on weekday Integrated Urgent Care service will be “We will continue to do everything we can to mornings. delivered from the University Hospital of maintain existing services and fight to see others The scheme – which this year was Hartlepool in Holdforth Road rather than the return as this is the overwhelming wish of the extended from 4 to 6 weeks – saw One Life facility in Park Road. people of our town.” 8,093 children benefitting from free It means that for the first time in the hospital’s Councillor Ray Martin-Wells, the Chair of swims. history, there will be a GP-led Integrated Urgent the Council’s Audit & Governance Committee Councillor Christopher Akers-Belcher, Care service delivered 24 hours per day, seven – the scrutiny arm of the Council, said: “I Leader of Hartlepool Council, said: “We days per week. -
Prevent, Prepare and Protect: Regional Crime Fighting & Counterterrorism Special Report 2
A GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY® S P E C I A L R E P O R T S PON S O R E D B Y: Prevent, Prepare and Protect: Regional Crime Fighting & Counterterrorism Special Report 2 “THAT’ S WHERE ORACLE IN T EGRAT I O N T ECHN O L O GY F I ts I N , I N K N O C K I N G D O W N T H os E S IL os — G AT H E R I N G A N D S H A R I N G T HAT I N F O RMAT I O N AM O N G D E T EC T IVE S .” LOU ANEMONE, former chief, New York Police Department A B E ttE R P E R spECTIVE Homeland security experts gather valuable crime statistics to present a bigger picture. For most of its history, law enforcement in the United In 1994, under the leadership of Police Commissioner States has been a localized affair. A sort of patchwork of William Bratton, Anemone and the late Deputy Police miniature kingdoms, each jurisdiction was responsible Commissioner Jack Maple created a management account- for itself. Even within cities themselves, individual pre- ability process known as COMPSTAT, short for Comput- cincts often manage crime on their turf — and they man- er Statistics. COMPSTAT revolutionized law enforcement age it alone. However, a new version of the legendary by giving police a computerized system for crime analysis COMPSTAT system, now powered by Oracle, is improv- and mapping. Developed by the NYPD, the system now is ing how police fight crime. -
EFC 1985 1986 Accounts
Tt-,e E'Jerton Football Club Company Limited Annual Report and Statement of Accounts at 31st May 1986 THE: EVERTONFOOTBALLClUn COMPANY I_IMITED NOTICE OF MEltrlNG NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the one hundred & Directors seventh Annual General Meeting of the Company will P. D. Carter, C.B.E., Chairman be held at the offices of The Everton Football Club T. H. W. Scott, Vice-Chairman Company Limited, Goodison Park, Liverpool L4 4EL, on G. A. Watts Thursday the 21 st Day of August, 1986, at 7.00 p,rn. A. W. Waterworth to receive and consider the Reportof the Directors, and K. M. Tamlin the Accounts for the Year ended 31 st May, 1986, to J. Search, G.M. elect Directors, to appoint Auditors for the ensuing D. A. 8. Newton year, and to fix their mmuneratlon, and to transact any other business which may be transacted at the Annual General Meeting of the Company. • The Transfer Books of the Company will be closed until Secretary and Registered Office 22nd August, 1986. J. Greenwood, Goodison Park, Liverpool L4 4EL - By Order of the Board. J. Gf1EENWOOD, Secretary, Goodlson Park, Liverpool L44F.L. Manage'( 28th July, 1986 H. Kendall Admission on Presentation of Annual Report Notice is also given that a Member of the Company Bankers entitled to attend and vote at the above Annual General Trustee Savings Bank Meeting is entitled to appoint a proxy to attend and vote instead of him, and that the proxy need not be a J member of the Company. Proxies must be lodgedat the Registered Office of the Company, notless than 48hours before the time ofthe Auditors Moeting. -
At Dalton Piercy, Elwick and Hart
at Dalton Piercy, Elwick and Hart Produced for the Villagers by Hart and Elwick Churches Rev. Canon Janet Burbury, The Vicarage , Hart, Hartlepool, TS27 3AP [email protected] Tel 01429 262340 Mob 07958 131271 Dear Friends Our churches are setting their 2019 budgets and deciding how much to offer the central funds which pay for all our legal structures, training, vicarages, stipends, church schools, safeguarding training and so on. Elwick and Hart try hard to raise our giving each year whilst bearing in mind the cost of maintaining our buildings, insurance, heating, resources, office equipment etc. Can we make money and our human economy sacred? Money can be the enemy of our better instincts blocking our generosity as we listen to that internal voice, “I can’t afford to”. Money is never a popular subject. Greed for it makes humanity raid the earth’s resources with too few courses of action to secure its sustainability and when politicians seek money rather than public good we call them worse than dirt. It’s been said that we cannot serve both God and Mammon. I know money do wonders to help society but on balance we more often than not feel those plastic looking folding notes are the root of many evils. Perhaps the biggest problem of money is the way we’ve come to see the physical aspects of life as separate from the sacred and holy. Once people decided that their folklore gods left their for- ests to live in the skies we started to think God is up there out of our world sitting on the clouds out of reach to us below. -
At Dalton Piercy, Elwick and Hart
at Dalton Piercy, Elwick and Hart Produced for the Villagers by Hart and Elwick Churches Revd. Janet Burbury, The Vicarage, Hart, Hartlepool. TS27 3AP [email protected] Tel. 01429 262340 Mob 07958 131271 Dear friends, At last the snow has disappeared and those of us who call themselves gardeners realise that we are a little behind with our preparation in making new life burst forth into our little patch of England that surrounds our homes. I’m looking forward to seeing houses adorned with eggs to remind us of the empty tomb and catkins that remind us that the trees are still growing and blossom will soon decorate our paths. Where’s the life in our communities at present? We enjoyed a great St Patrick’s night in Hart Village Hall and soon we’ll have our Pie n Peas night at Elwick. These evenings are gentle social times when we re- mind folks that community spirit is not lost and in the villages we continue to value it highly. Hart church is looking forward to seeing a new stained glass window which will de- pict the parable of the Sower. I’ll give you more details of that next time!! Children who attend Hart can now enjoy some new tailor made desks and seating which are fabulous. Many thanks go the Johnson family for their kind donation of this fur- niture which will serve generations of children in years to come. As Jesus prepared to show the world that he came to offer the fullness of life, it’s interesting that most of the disciples abandoned him in the hours before his trial. -
Trade Marks Inter Parte Decision,O/117/06
O-117-06 TRADE MARKS ACT 1994 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION NO 2328312 BY POOL FM LIMITED TO REGISTER THE TRADE MARK: Pool FM IN CLASSES 38 AND 41 AND THE OPPOSITION THERETO UNDER NO 92441 BY GARRISON RADIO LTD Trade Marks Act 1994 In the matter of application no 2328312 by Pool FM Limited to register the trade mark: Pool FM in classes 38 and 41 and the opposition thereto under no 92441 by Garrison Radio Ltd BACKGROUND 1) On 2 April 2003 Pool FM Limited, which I will refer to as PFM, applied to register the trade mark Pool FM (the trade mark). The application was published for opposition purposes in the “Trade Marks Journal” on 23 January 2004 with the following specification: radio broadcasting services, telecommunication services, electronic communication services; production of radio programmes; provision of information over the radio. The above services are in classes 38 and 41 respectively of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended. 2) On 23 April 2004 Garrison Radio Ltd, which I will refer to as Garrison filed a notice of opposition to the registration of the application. The original grounds of opposition were amended. 3) Garrison states that it was incorporated under the Companies Act 1985 on 10 April 2001 and commenced to trade as soon as it was incorporated. Garrison states that it is a Hartlepool based company that runs radio stations. Its main contract is with the British army and it provides four fully staffed broadcasting stations around the United Kingdom.