DOCSLIB.ORG

The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion Murray Darling Murray Depression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion Murray Darling Murray Depression 79 CHAPTER 7 The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion Murray Darling Murray Depression 1. Location 2. Climate The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion lies in the southwest corner of NSW The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion is dominated by a hot semi-arid and extends into Vic and SA. The total area of the bioregion is 19,717,651 ha climate in the northern section of the bioregion including the northeastern with 40.71% (8,026,167 ha) of this area in NSW and covering 10.03% of the arms, and a warm semi-arid climate in the southern half of the bioregion and state. eastern outliers. Small patches in the west of the bioregion fall in the NSW arid zone (Stern et al. 2000). The NSW portion of the bioregion is bounded in the north by the Broken Hill Complex Bioregion, with the Cobar Peneplain to the northeast and the Riverina Bioregion to the east. The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion also 3. Topography borders the Darling Riverine Plains to the northwest and contains outlying remnants of the Darling River and tributaries as they meet the Murray River The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion lies in the Murray Basin on Tertiary at the Victorian border. and Quaternary sediments deposited from a shallow sea, lakes and rivers.The bioregion extends into Vic and SA. The landscape is characterised by The bioregion lies entirely in the Western Division of NSW and contains few dunefields, sandplains and undulating plains of brown calcareous soils.There town centres, with Ivanhoe, just near the tip of the Riverina Bioregion, being is very little structured drainage but numerous lakes, swamps and the major settlement aside from Manilla, Emmdale and other pastoral depressions are present, some of which are driven by saline groundwater. stations in the bioregion. The bioregion includes the Murray, Murrumbidgee, Lachlan, Darling, Barwon, Yanda River and Peacock Creek catchments. Mean Annual Minimum Maximum Mean Annual Minimum Maximum Temperature Average Monthly Average Monthly Rainfall Average Monthly Average Monthly Temperature Temperature Rainfall Rainfall 16 – 19°C 2.9 – 4.9°C 32.4 – 35°C 210 – 408mm 12 – 29mm 22 – 40mm 80 The Bioregions of New South Wales – their biodiversity, conservation and history 4. Geology and geomorphology Lakes and depressions all have clay floors, and vegetation relates to the presence or absence of salt and gypsum. Infrequently flooded freshwater The Murray Basin is a shallow crustal depression filled with marine and lakes carry cane grass (Eragrostis australasica), lignum (Muehlenbeckia terrestrial sediments to a maximum depth of 600m over the last 50-60 cunninghamii) and nitre goosefoot (Chenopodium nitrariaceum), with clumps million years. Shallow seas have moved back and forth across the plains of black box (Eucalyptus largiflorens) on the margins. several times, leaving traces of parallel beach ridges and limestone sediments under the dunefields. At one stage the coast reached as far inland as The vegetation on lunettes varies. Clean sands often have white cypress pine, Balranald. while brown clayey sands support mallee with porcupine grass. Mixed sand and clay lunettes carry rosewood, belah, western pittosporum (Pittosporum Sandy surface sediments have been extensively reworked into dunes and phylliraeoides), narrow-leaf hopbush and bluebush. sandplains that have blown onto the Cobar Peneplain. Some dunes have consistent east-west linear patterns, others are parabolic, suggesting The largest rocky hills, Maccullochs Range, carry mulga (Acacia aneura) differences in vegetation cover, sand supply or age. The Darling River and dominated vegetation very similar to much of the Cobar Peneplain. Smaller streams in the Riverina have cut through the sands and constructed hills have more of a mixture of local sandplain species and distant rocky slope numerous overflow lakes such as the Sayers Lake system and the abandoned species. Pleistocene channels and basins of the Willandra Lakes complex. Saline groundwaters have formed salt basins in many places where the sandplain or 7.2 Significant flora dune topography intersects the water table. All lakes and swamps have well- Stipa nullanulla, now Austrostipa nullanulla, has been identified as regionally formed lunettes on their eastern margins that record evidence of climate endemic to the Murray Darling Depression Bioregion and is listed as change and human occupation. A few bedrock ridges rise above the endangered in the TSC Act 1995 (Bowen and Pressey 1993, cited in Morton et sandplains as isolated ranges. al. 1995). Murray Darling Murray Depression Significant flora species in the bioregion include Austrostipa metatoris, 5. Geodiversity Mossgiel daisy (Brachycome papillosa), Atriplex infrequens, and Swainsona pyrophila, all listed as vulnerable in NSW. The bioregion also supports The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion has many important wetlands. irongrass (Lomandra patens), found mainly within the Cobar Peneplain Other significant geodiversity features include: Bioregion, desert carpet-weed (Glinus orygioides), found mainly in the far flooding frequency varies and water quality and lake or swamp northwest, bluebush daisy (Cratystylis conocephala), which is very rare in environments are very diverse; NSW, Olearia calcarea, found only near White Cliffs, sand cress (Pachymitus abandoned systems, such as the Willandra Lakes, preserve evidence of past cardaminoides), Indigofera helmsii and Menindee nightshade (Solanum climates and environments along with abundant archaeology; there are karsensis) (Bowen and Pressey 1993, cited in Morton et al. 1995, Cunningham many equivalent lunette sites that have not yet been examined; et al. 1981). heavy sand mineral resources and large deposits of gypsum are known but not exploited. Other significant species are the salt pipewort (Eriocaulon australasicum) and Codonocarpus pyramidalis (Fox 1991, cited in Morton et al. 1995) as well as 6. Soils Atriplex papillata near salt lakes and the yellow Darling pea (Swainsona laxa). These are considered to be relict populations and rare in NSW, although S. Soils and vegetation differ according to the landform. On the dunefields red, laxa also occurs near Menindee in the Darling Riverine Plains Bioregion brown and yellow calcareous sands occur with more clayey materials in the (Cunningham et al. 1981). swales. On sandplains the soil tends to be heavier with brown gradational or texture contrast profiles, and mallee is found only on sandy rises. Lakes and depressions all have clay floors. The more saline lakes have grey cracking clays and carry chenopods. Salt lake floors carry little vegetation. Lunettes comprise varying soils from clean sands, brown clayey sands, mixed sand to clay. 7. Biodiversity 7.1 Plant communities Typical sandplain species include rosewood (Heterodendrum oleifolium), white cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla), narrow-leaf hopbush (Dodonea viscosa), punty bush (Cassia eremophila), belah, copperburrs (Sclerolaena sp.), black bluebush (Maireana pyramidata) and variable spear grass. The dunes support diverse mallee (Eucalyptus sp.) communities with mixed shrubs and porcupine grass (Triodia pungens). Belah (Casuarina pauper), rosewood and variable spear grass (Stipa variabilis) occupy the swales. Photo: NPWS The Murray Darling Depression Bioregion 81 Birds of the chenopod shrublands in the bioregion seem to be at risk of decline (Reid and Fleming 1992, cited in Morton et al. 1995). Most of the extant eastern mallee (Eucalyptus sp.) and its former range (now mostly wheatfields) lies in the Murray Darling Depression Bioregion. There are several large and many small mallee remnants in the bioregion.Three bird species are found mostly or entirely in the long unburnt mallee in this bioregion; the red-lored whistler (Pachycephala rufogularis), the vulnerable mallee emu-wren (Stipiturus mallee) and the endangered black-eared miner (Manorina melanotis). Major populations of the endangered eastern subspecies of regent parrot (Polytelis anthopeplus), which moves between mallee and river red gum vegetation, are found in the bioregion. The western whipbird (Psophodes nigrogularis), the vulnerable malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata) and the endangered plains wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus), the range of which is centred on the Riverina, can also be found. More than 4% of birds observed in the bioregion are exotic species, including the Eurasian skylark (Alauda arvensis), European goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) and the common starling (Sturnus vulgaris), all of which have adapted well to the agricultural landscapes of the bioregion. Numbers of the musk lorikeet (Glossopsitta concinna) have increased in the bioregion, as have temperate forest and temperate woodland birds. Darling Murray Depression Photo: G. Bridle Conversely, grassland, ground-nesting birds and ground-feeding insectivorous species have decreased in numbers. The general trend in this 7.3 Significant fauna bioregion is a gradual decline in numbers in isolated habitat fragments, and extinctions that occur in major mallee blocks during rare, large-scale fires.The The malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata), which is listed as endangered in the TSC Act, future of many bird populations in the bioregion may be dependent on is found throughout western NSW, including in the Murray Darling appropriate fire management as well as the restoration, expansion and Depression Bioregion (Priddel 1990, Garnett 1992, cited in Morton et al. 1995). linking of habitat fragments. The plains-wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus), listed as vulnerable in the TSC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Reforms Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232
    Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Reforms Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232 21st June 2017 To the Office of Environment and Heritage, Stand Up For Nature is an alliance of environment, wildlife and heritage groups in support of strong biodiversity and native vegetation laws in NSW. Together we represent tens of thousands of people who want the NSW Government to safeguard the future of our unique wildlife, and our healthy soils and water resources. Stand Up For Nature members include: Nature Conservation Council of NSW | Total Environment Centre National Parks Association of NSW | Humane Society International The Wilderness Society | Colong Foundation for Wilderness | NSW WIRES WWF Australia |National Trust |Birdlife Australia IFAW We urge the NSW Government to abandon the draft Regulations and Codes under the Biodiversity Conservation 2016 and Local Land Services Amendment Act 2016 and develop strong biodiversity conservation laws that are scientifically robust and that will deliver improved environmental outcomes, now and for future generations. Please count this as our formal submission into these important documents, and do not hesitate to contact Daisy Barham, Campaigns Director, Nature Conservation Council on [email protected] for any further information. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 KEY ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE CODES AND REGULATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 Timeframe and the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map 2 Broad-scale land clearing 3 Threatened ecological communities 3 Koala
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Vertebrate Communities Across the Australian
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1059–1070 ORIGINAL Phylogenetic structure of vertebrate ARTICLE communities across the Australian arid zone Hayley C. Lanier*, Danielle L. Edwards and L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ABSTRACT Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Aim To understand the relative importance of ecological and historical factors Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA in structuring terrestrial vertebrate assemblages across the Australian arid zone, and to contrast patterns of community phylogenetic structure at a continental scale. Location Australia. Methods We present evidence from six lineages of terrestrial vertebrates (five lizard clades and one clade of marsupial mice) that have diversified in arid and semi-arid Australia across 37 biogeographical regions. Measures of within-line- age community phylogenetic structure and species turnover were computed to examine how patterns differ across the continent and between taxonomic groups. These results were examined in relation to climatic and historical fac- tors, which are thought to play a role in community phylogenetic structure. Analyses using a novel sliding-window approach confirm the generality of pro- cesses structuring the assemblages of the Australian arid zone at different spa- tial scales. Results Phylogenetic structure differed greatly across taxonomic groups. Although these lineages have radiated within the same biome – the Australian arid zone – they exhibit markedly different community structure at the regio- nal and local levels. Neither current climatic factors nor historical habitat sta- bility resulted in a uniform response across communities. Rather, historical and biogeographical aspects of community composition (i.e. local lineage per- sistence and diversification histories) appeared to be more important in explaining the variation in phylogenetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Nature's Safety Net 2008
    Building Nature’s Safety Net 2008 Progress on the Directions for the National Reserve System Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Telstra is a proud partner of the WWF Building Nature's Map sources and caveats Safety Net initiative. The Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia © WWF-Australia. All rights protected (IBRA) version 6.1 (2004) and the CAPAD (2006) were ISBN: 1 921031 271 developed through cooperative efforts of the Australian Authors: Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage WWF-Australia and the Arts and State/Territory land management agencies. Head Office Custodianship rests with these agencies. GPO Box 528 Maps are copyright © the Australian Government Department Sydney NSW 2001 of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 2008 or © Tel: +612 9281 5515 Fax: +612 9281 1060 WWF-Australia as indicated. www.wwf.org.au About the Authors First published March 2008 by WWF-Australia. Any reproduction in full or part of this publication must Paul Sattler OAM mention the title and credit the above mentioned publisher Paul has a lifetime experience working professionally in as the copyright owner. The report is may also be nature conservation. In the early 1990’s, whilst with the downloaded as a pdf file from the WWF-Australia website. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Paul was the principal This report should be cited as: architect in doubling Queensland’s National Park estate. This included the implementation of representative park networks Sattler, P.S. and Taylor, M.F.J. 2008. Building Nature’s for bioregions across the State. Paul initiated and guided the Safety Net 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Koala Conservation Status in New South Wales Biolink Koala Conservation Review
    koala conservation status in new south wales Biolink koala conservation review Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 6 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE NSW POPULATION .............................................................. 6 Current distribution ............................................................................................................... 6 Size of NSW koala population .............................................................................................. 8 4. INFORMING CHANGES TO POPULATION ESTIMATES ....................................... 12 Bionet Records and Published Reports ............................................................................... 15 Methods – Bionet records ............................................................................................... 15 Methods – available reports ............................................................................................ 15 Results ............................................................................................................................ 16 The 2019 Fires .................................................................................................................... 22 Methods .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Box (Eucalyptus Microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia
    Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia: A guide to the identification, assessment and management of a nationally threatened ecological community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Glossary the Glossary at the back of this publication. © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercialised use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Public Affairs - Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2610 Australia or email [email protected] Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and is valid as at June 2012. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. CONTENTS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE? 1 NATIONALLY THREATENED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 2 What is a nationally threatened ecological community? 2 Why does the Australian Government list threatened ecological communities? 2 Why list the Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia as
    [Show full text]
  • Koala Context
    IBRA Regions: AUA = Australian Alps CYP BBN = Brigalow Belt North )" Cooktown BBS = Brigalow Belt South CMC = Central Mackay Coast COP = Cobar Peneplain CYP = Cape York Peninsula ") Cairns DEU = Desert Uplands DRP = Darling Riverine Plains WET EIU = Einasleigh Uplands EIU GUP = Gulf Plains GUP MDD = Murray Darling Depression MGD = Mitchell Grass Downs ") Townsville MUL = Mulga Lands NAN = Nandewar NET = New England Tablelands NNC = NSW North Coast )" Hughenden NSS = NSW South Western Slopes ") CMC RIV = Riverina SEC = South East Corner MGD DEU SEH = South Eastern Highlands BBN SEQ = South East Queensland SYB = Sydney Basin ") WET = Wet Tropics )" Rockhampton Longreach ") Emerald ") Bundaberg BBS )" Charleville )" SEQ )" Quilpie Roma MUL ") Brisbane )" Cunnamulla )" Bourke NAN NET ") Coffs Harbour DRP ") Tamworth )" Cobar ") Broken Hill COP NNC ") Dubbo MDD ") Newcastle SYB ") Sydney ") Mildura NSS RIV )" Hay ") Wagga Wagga SEH Adelaide ") ") Canberra ") ") Echuca Albury AUA SEC )" Eden ") Melbourne © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 INDICATIVE MAP ONLY: For the latest departmental information, please refer to the Protected Matters Search Tool and the Species Profiles & Threats Database at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/index.html km 0 100 200 300 400 500 IBRA Regions Koala Habitat Context Coastal >= 800mm Rainfall Produced by: Environmental Resources Information Network (2014) Inland < 800mm Rainfall Contextual data source: Geoscience Australia (2006), Geodata Topo 250K Topographic Data and 10M Topographic Data. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia (IBRA), Version 7. Other data sources: Commonwealth of Australia, Bureau of Meteorology (2003). Mean annual rainfall (30-year period 1961-1990). Caveat: The information presented in this map has been provided by a Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Pterostylis Cobarensis (Cobar Greenhood Orchid)
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Pterostylis cobarensis (Cobar Greenhood Orchid) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Pterostylis cobarensis, Family Orchidaceae, also known as Cobar Greenhood Orchid, is a terrestrial orchid with 7–11 narrow-elliptic leaves which form a basal rosette, each 1.5–2.5 cm long and 5–8 mm wide. Three to eight flowers grow on stems up to 40 cm high, with 3–5 closely sheathing stem leaves. Flowers are transparent with brown and green markings, each flower about 1.2 cm long. Flowering occurs from September to November. Vegetative reproduction is not common in this group of Greenhoods, but some species may form more than one daughter tuber annually. Plants are deciduous and die back to the large, underground tubers after seed release. New rosettes are produced following soaking autumn and winter rains. Pterostylis cobarensis is pollinated by the males of small gnats which are attracted to the flower by some pseudosexual perfume (DECC, 2008a). Conservation Status Cobar Greenhood Orchid is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth).
    [Show full text]
  • HERPETOFAUNA TEXT 40-1.2 3/3/11 2:20 PM Page 39
    HERPETOFAUNA TEXT 40-1.2 3/3/11 2:20 PM Page 39 THE HERPETOFAUNA OF THE BIMBLE BOX-PINE WOODLANDS OF THE COBAR PENEPLAIN, WESTERN NSW Steven Sass1 and Gerry Swan2 1EnviroKey, PO Box 7231, Tathra, NSW 2550. Email: [email protected]. 2 Cygnet Consulting, 2 Acron Rd, St. Ives, NSW 2075. INTRODUCTION 1993; Henle, 1987; Olsson et al., 2005; Sass & Wilson, 2006; Schlesinger et al., 1997). The Cobar Peneplain is one of eighty biogeo- graphic regions identified in Australia (Thack- The aim of this paper is to document the her- way & Creswell, 1995) and lies within the petofauna that occur within bimble box-pine Central West of New South Wales, occupying woodlands of the Cobar Peneplain bioregion over 73,000 square kilometres, or approxi- from records of the authors and by conduct- mately one-tenth of the area of New South ing a review of previous literature relevant to Wales (NPWS, 2000). It includes parts of the this vegetation community. The conservation Western and Central Divisions, extending status of some species is also discussed. from near Bourke in the north, through to Griffith in the south, and includes the towns of METHODS Nymagee, Cobar, Nyngan, Condobolin and Lake Cargelligo. Only 2.49% of the bioregion The Cobar Peneplain region is well known to is protected by conservation reserves (NPWS, both authors, who have conducted numerous 2003). reptile surveys there since the 1980s. More specifically, six sites have been the subject of Currently the region largely supports dense extensive herpetofauna surveys on numerous shrub woodlands, with a shrubby understorey occasions, and their data provides an exten- or herbs and grasses (CVMC, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Plant Communities of the NSW Western Plains
    2022-Handout Workshop on Theoretical Ecology and Global Change 2 - 18 March 2009 New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: Part 1 Plant communities of the NSW Western Plains Benson J.S.* (C.B. Allen, C. Togher and J. Lemmon) Science and Public Programs Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Sydney, NSW 2000 AUSTRALIA 383 New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: Part 1 Plant communities of the NSW Western Plains J.S. Benson*, C.B. Allen*, C. Togher** and J. Lemmon*** *Science and Public Programs, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA. ** GIS Section NSW Department of Environment & Conservation, PO Box 1967 Hurstville, NSW 2220; ***Environment & Development Department, Wollongong City Council, Locked Bag 8821, South Coast Mail Centre, NSW 2521. Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: For the Western Plains of New South Wales, 213 plant communities are classified and described and their protected area and threat status assessed. The communities are listed on the NSW Vegetation Classification and Assessment database (NSWVCA). The full description of the communities is placed on an accompanying CD together with a read-only version of the NSWVCA database. The NSW Western Plains is 45.5 million hectares in size and covers 57% of NSW. The vegetation descriptions are based on over 250 published and unpublished vegetation surveys and maps produced over the last 50 years (listed in a bibliography), rapid field checks and the expert knowledge on the vegetation. The 213 communities occur over eight Australian bioregions and eight NSW Catchment Management Authority areas. As of December 2005, 3.7% of the Western Plains was protected in 83 protected areas comprising 62 public conservation reserves and 21 secure property agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographical Variation in the Potential Effectiveness of Prescribed Fire in South-Eastern Australia Owen F
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2015 Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia Owen F. Price University of Wollongong, [email protected] Trent D. Penman University of Melbourne, [email protected] Ross A. Bradstock University of Wollongong, [email protected] Mathias M. Boer Universty of Western Sydney Hamish Clarke NSW Office ofn E vironment and Heritage Publication Details Price, O. F., Penman, T. D., Bradstock, R. A., Boer, M. M. & Clarke, H. (2015). Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Biogeography, 42 (11), 2234-2245. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia Abstract Aim Prescribed fire is a common land management for reducing risks from unplanned fires. However, the universality of such effectiveness remains uncertain due to biogeographical variation in fuel types, climatic influences and fire regimes. Here, we explore biogeographical patterns in the effectiveness of prescribed fire by calculating leverage (the reduction in unplanned area burnt resulting from recent previous area burnt) across south-eastern Australia over a 25 year period. Location The 30 bioregions of south-eastern Australia. Methods We quantified leverage in each bioregion from fire records from 1975-2009, controlling for variation in annual weather. We also identified potential drivers of variation in leverage by relating the bioregional leverage values to measures of fuel type and growth, climate, and weather extremes.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Application of Species Richness Estimators to Predict the Host Range of Parasites
    International Journal for Parasitology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpara Novel application of species richness estimators to predict the host range of parasites David M. Watson a,, Kirsty V. Milner b, Andrea Leigh b a School of Environmental Science, Charles Sturt University, Albury 2640, Australia b School of Life Science, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo 2007, Australia article info abstract Article history: Host range is a critical life history trait of parasites, influencing prevalence, virulence and ultimately Received 16 June 2016 determining their distributional extent. Current approaches to measure host range are sensitive to sam- Received in revised form 30 September pling effort, the number of known hosts increasing with more records. Here, we develop a novel applica- 2016 tion of results-based stopping rules to determine how many hosts should be sampled to yield stable Accepted 5 October 2016 estimates of the number of primary hosts within regions, then use species richness estimation to predict Available online xxxx host ranges of parasites across their distributional ranges. We selected three mistletoe species (hemipar- asitic plants in the Loranthaceae) to evaluate our approach: a strict host specialist (Amyema lucasii, Keywords: dependent on a single host species), an intermediate species (Amyema quandang, dependent on hosts Host range Host specificity in one genus) and a generalist (Lysiana
    [Show full text]
  • Using Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling and Targeted Field Surveys to Gap-Fill an Ecosystem Surveillance Network
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys 2 to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network 3 4 Greg R. Guerin1,2*, Kristen J. Williams3, Emrys Leitch1,2, Andrew J. Lowe1, Ben Sparrow1,2 5 6 1School of Biological Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, 7 Australia 8 2Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network 9 3CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia 10 11 *Email: [email protected] 12 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 13 Abstract 14 1. When considering which sites or land parcels complement existing conservation or 15 monitoring networks, there are many strategies for optimising ecological coverage in the 16 absence of ground observations. However, such optimisation is often implemented 17 theoretically in conservation prioritisation frameworks and real-world implementation is 18 rarely assessed, particularly for networks of monitoring sites. 19 2. We assessed the performance of adding new survey sites informed by predictive modelling 20 in gap-filling the ecological coverage of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network’s 21 (TERN) continental network of ecosystem surveillance plots, Ausplots.
    [Show full text]