DOCSLIB.ORG

A Rpt on the Expl Program on Firesteel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

52G«2SW0«12 Z . 1 3943 PYRAMID LAKE 010 £•1344 & A REPORT on the EXPLORATION PROGRAM on THE FIRESTEEL RIVER PROPERTY DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO N.T.S, 52-G-2W RECEIVED FEB 2 2 1991 MINING LANDS SECTION R.A. Bernatchez, P.Eng., January 13, 1991 Consulting Geologist 52Geaswe«i2 2.13943 PYRAMID LAKE 010C TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 LOCATION AND ACCESS 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2 EXPLORATION HISTORY 4 GEOLOGY 5 Mafic Volcanics 5 Felsic Volcanics 7 Sediments 7 Felsic Intrusives 7 Ultramafic Intrusives 7 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY 7 Magnetic Survey 7 VLF-EM Survey 9 CONCLUSIONS 10 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 MAPS MAP A Geology and Trench Location Scale: 1" = 200© MAP B Magnetic Survey Scale: 1" = 200© MAP C VLF-EM Survey Scale: 1" = 200© INTRODUCTION The Property was staked in the spring of 1990 for Jim Vibert of Upsala, Ontario. His interest was initiated by exploration activity in the area. A Mr. Chapman of Upsala , while working on a sulphide occurrence, reported gold, copper and nickel values. The staking of claims by Mr. Vibert, on the east side of the Seine River Indian Reservation No.22 resulted in the discovery of a green fuchsite carbonate horizon associated with a volcanic- sedimentary suite of rocks striking east-west. The sediments contained several narrow magnetite iron formation bands. These magnetite bands are expressed as a high magnetic anomaly on O.G.S. Map 80533 (1980). Further power stripping and trenching in the area of the discovery exposed an 8-13 metre wide buff and green fuchsitic carbonate horizon. This horizon has traced by stripping for a strike length of 360 mtres. Samples collected from stripping area S-l across a 13 metres wide green-buff carbonate zone returned consistent values of 0.01 to 0.02 oz gold per ton. Additional samples obtained from S-6 also returned one sample with 0.02 oz gold per ton. A magnetic and VLF-EM survey was conducted over a small grid cut by Mr. Vibert in the fall of 1990. This survey was done to trace out the green-buff fuchsitic carbonate horizon west of S-l. This report summarizes the work carried out by Mr. Vibert in 1990. Mr. Vibert engaged the author to oversee the direction of the program. LOCATION AND ACCESS The Property i s l ocated 25 km west of Upsala in the Lumby Lake Volcanic belt. The Property can be reached from Upsala via Highway 17 to the Firesteel-Graham Road intersection 16 km west of Upsala. Follow the Firesteel logging road westerly for 10 km, turning southward on another gravel road for 1 km. Next, turn right a few hundred feet south of a wooden bridge and follow an old bush road westerly for about 4.9 km to within 400 metres of the northeast corner of the Seine River Indian Reserve No.22-A2. A walking trail from here leads to the main showing. The Property is located at the east end of the Reserve and south of the Firesteel River. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Property consists of twenty-seven (27) claims numbered as follows: 1138985 and 1138986 2 1142043 to 1142047 5 1142223 to 1142231 9 1142432 to 1142441 10 1142824 TOTAL 27 claims The claims are located in the Thunder Bay Mining Division and are recorded in the Mining Recorder©s Office in Thunder Bay, Ontario. EXPLORATION HISTORY The only assessment work reported in the area is a diamond drill hole drilled by Canadian Nickel Co. in 1968-69. This hole is located approximately 530 metres north of the main showing and is reported on O.G.S. preliminary data series map P.2154. The hole intersected pyrrhotite, pyrite, magnetite and graphite mineralization in chlorite schist. The only other work performed in the area was by Noranda Exploration Company Ltd. in 1967, some 5 km west of the Property, Noranda carried out surface geophysical magnetometer and EM surveys and drilled three (3) holes. Mineralogy similar to that found by Canadian Nickel Co. was found in these holes, however, chalcopyrite was noted in all three drill holes. In 1990, the Chapman Group restaked a portion of the Noranda claims and carried out some stripping and trenching. A sample of the mineralized zones was shown at the O.G.S. geoscience seminar in Thunder Bay in February of 1990. This sample initiated the staking of the Vibert Property in the spring of 1990. Power stripping and trenching followed. The Property was visited by the author on two occasions in the spring of 1990. During the late spring or early summer of 1990, the governmoent resident geologist from Thunder Bay visited the Property. Several samples taken by the resident geologist returned favourable gold assays of 0.02 oz gold per ton over 13 metres. These values indicated favourable quantities of gold in this green fuchsitic carbonate horizon. In the fall of 1990, Mr. Vibert cut a small grid and a magnetometer and VLF-EM survey was done by Mr. Vibert and the author over most of this grid. The results of the mag survey indicate a potential continuation of the green fuchsitic carbonate horizon westward for another 500 metres from the main S-l horizon stripping area. The VLF-EM survey also detected some conductive zones in the same area. GEOLOGY The area is moderately to heavily covered with glacial silty sand outwash. One hole drilled by Canadian Nickel indicated 90 feet of overburden. The geology exposed by stripping at the main showing and further eastward, showed that the Property is underlain by Archean volcanic, sedimentary, intrusive felsic and ultramafic rocks. The following suites of rocks are found on the Property: Mafic Volcanic Rocks la tuff Ib pillowed and massive flows Ic chlorite schist Felsic Metavolcanic Rocks 2a sericite schist Sediments 3a magnetite iron formation 3b carbonate Felsic Intrusive 4a feldspar porphyry Ultramafic Intrusive dunite MAFIC VOLCANICS The main rock types around the green carbonate horizon consist of mafic tuffs which are c.arbonatized and chloritized. Pillowed and massive flows were observed east of the main Property, along the old bush road. PELS1C VOLCANIC ROCKS A few narrow bands of sericite schists which may be felsic tuffs, were observed at S-l. These tuff beds are intercalated with mafic tuffs and iron formations. SEDIMENTS Several narrow 1-5 foot wide bands of bedded iron formation were found at the main stripping area at S-l. These correspond to the magnetic highs on the mag map. FELSIC INTRUSIVES Feldspar porphyry was observed at S-l which appears to be narrow dykes intruded parallel to the bedding of the sediments and volcanic tuff beds. ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVES An outcrop of ultramafic intrusive rock was observed 1500 to 2000 feet southeast of the main showing. This rock is black, medium to coarse grained and contains disseminated pyrrhotite and magnetite mineralization. Very little work has been done on this rock type to date. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS MAGNETOMETER SURVEY A magnetic survey was carried out over 2.0 km of baseline and picket lines taking a total of eighty-nine (89) readings. The results are shown on Map-B. It appears that the green fuchsitic gold bearing carbonate horizon corresponds to magnetic readings varying between 700 and 1000 gammmas and extends westward from line 0+00 to line 16+OOW. The magnetic survey indicates a thickening of the carbonate horizon west of line 0+00 to over 50 metres in width on line 8+OOW and 12+OOW. Discontinuous magnetic highs continue westward from line 0+00 and probably correspond to extensions of the magnetite iron formation observed at S-l. This survey also indicates that there is more than one horizon of iron formation within the surveyed area. The magnetic survey also indicates possible folding of the iron formation. This folding was also observed within some green carbonate samples obtained from the trenching at S-6. VLF-EM SURVEY Weak to moderate strength conductive zones were encountered over the same surveyed area. These conductors are closely associated with the westerly projection of the green carbonate horizon from line 0+00. 10 CONCLUSIONS The green fuchsitic carbonate horizon has been proven to be gold bearing over a width of 13 metres at S-l. This gold bearing green carbonate horizon represents a major gold exploration target not previously recognized in this area. The green carbonatae horizon has been traced by stripping and gephysical survey over a strike length of 800 metres. The area has had little to no previous exploration history. The ultramafic intrusive discovered at the south end of the Property should be tested for its copper, nickel and platinum group metal. 11 RECOMMENDATIONS The Property definitely warrants further evaluation. This work should consist of line cutting, geophysical surveys, geological mapping, power stripping and trenching, to be followed by a second phase program of diamond drilling. PHASE I Line Cutting 30 km 9 $ 250.00/km $ 7,500.00 Geophysical Surveys Mag - 30 km 9 $ 110.00/km 3,300.00 EM - 28 km @ $110.00/km 3,080.00 Geological Mapping 30 days at $300.00/day 9,000.00 Power Stripping 20,000.00 Total $ 42,880.00 PHASE II Diamond Drilling 3000 feet 9 $ 25.00/ft. $ 75,000.00 Drill Supervision, Logging, Sampling, Asaying, Report 3000 feet @ $5.00/ft. 15,000.00 Total $ 90,000.00 TOTAL PHASE I and II $132,880.00 15% Contingencies (GST included) $ 19,932.00 TOTAL COST $152,812.00 R.A. Ber Consulti 23394 SWASTIKA LABORATORIES (A OMSION OF ASSAYERS CORPORATION UMTTED) P.O. BOX 10. SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 FAX (705) 642-3300 VENOUA SOLD TO ..Mr.R.
Recommended publications
  • Water Management of the Steep Rock Iron Mines at Atikokan, Ontario During Construction, Operations, and After Mine Abandonment

    Water Management of the Steep Rock Iron Mines at Atikokan, Ontario During Construction, Operations, and After Mine Abandonment

    Proceedings of the 25th Annual British Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium in Campbell River, BC, 2001. The Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation WATER MANAGEMENT OF THE STEEP ROCK IRON MINES AT ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO DURING CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS, AND AFTER MINE ABANDONMENT V. A. Sowa, P. Eng., F.E.I.C. 1 R. B. Adamson, P. Eng.2 A.W. Chow, P. Eng.3 1 Jacques Whitford and Associates Limited, Vancouver, British Columbia 2 Adamson Consulting, Thunder Bay, Ontario 3 Northwest Region, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, Ontario ABSTRACT The Steep Rock Iron Mines at Atikokan, Ontario operated from 1944 to 1979. The iron ore was located at the bottom of Steep Rock Lake and water management was a key factor in developing the mines. Open pit mining required a massive water diversion scheme, including the diversion of the Seine River, draining of Steep Rock Lake, and construction of various dams and other diversion structures. In order to abandon the mine, the Province of Ontario required a suitable abandonment and long-term water management plan, and assessment of the condition of the various water control and diversion structures. Reclamation of the Seine River to its original course was not possible and, consequently, the water control structures, primarily dams and tunnels, will be operating in perpetuity. The water management during the development of the mines and during operations is described, as well as some insight into future water management options after abandonment. INTRODUCTION The richest undeveloped deposit of hematite iron ore on the North American continent at the time was discovered in 1938 beneath Steep Rock Lake, near Atikokan, Ontario.
  • District of Rainy River Community Profile & Demographics

    District of Rainy River Community Profile & Demographics

    District of Rainy River Community Profile & Demographics January 2021 Prepared by: Rainy River Future Development Corporation District of Rainy River Contents Community Futures Development Corporation ............................................................... 3 Natural Resources........................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Location ........................................................................................................... 6 Levels of Government ..................................................................................................... 7 Municipal Contact Information ......................................................................................... 7 Regional First Nation Communities ................................................................................. 8 Regional Chambers of Commerce .................................................................................. 9 Education ...................................................................................................................... 10 Educational Institutions ................................................................................................. 11 Rainy River District Schools .......................................................................................... 12 Telecommunications ..................................................................................................... 15 Utilities ..........................................................................................................................
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    2004 to 2014 Seine River Water Management Plan _________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page # i. Executive Summary of the Draft Water Management 1 Plan 1 Approval Pages 1.1 Signature Page – WMP Author, Abitibi 5 Consolidated, Valerie Falls, MNR 1.2 Signature Page – Public Advisory Committees, 7 First Nations 1.3 Signature Page – Chiefs, Lac des Mille Lacs 9 First Nation and Seine River First Nation 2 Introduction 2.1 Watershed Location 11 2.2 Goal and Guiding Principles of Water 13 Management Planning 2.3 The Terms of Reference 14 2.4 Summary of the Planning Process 15 3 History of Waterpower Development and Operations 3.1 Brief History of Operations on the Seine River 18 3.2 Description of Reservoirs and Control Structures 19 3.3 Pre-plan Water Management on the Seine River 29 4 Physical and Biological Descriptions 4.1 Physical Description 40 4.2 Climate 43 4.3 Biological Description 44 4.4 Valued Ecosystem Components 49 4.5 Effects of Waterpower Facilities and Water 52 Control Structures on Riverine Ecosystem 5 Social-Economic Description and Profile 5.1 Community Profiles 58 5.1.1 Upsala and Surrounding Areas 58 5.1.2 First Nations 59 5.1.3 Atikokan 62 5.2 Economic and Social Values 63 6 Issues Identified Through Scoping 6.1 Compilation of Issues 71 i 2004 to 2014 Seine River Water Management Plan _________________________________________________________________ 6.2 Spatial & Temporal Assessment 79 6.3 Issues not addressed in Planning 80 7 Plan Objectives 7.1 Developing the Objectives
  • 2021 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book

    2021 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book

    2021 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book You are receiving this document because your crew has chosen to paddle in the Crown Lands or you are a crew of 9 to 11 people which can only travel in the Crown Lands. The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources requires a route selection well in advance of your trip. You must select your preferred route by the day your final payment is due so that we may submit it to the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) with enough notice for your trip. Canada is comprised of 89% Crown Land. It is all un-owned land, coast to coast in Canada. Locals refer to the area we paddle simply as “the Bush.” The routes in this document allow us to better accommodate your crew and give our Interpreters a general idea of where you want to travel so they may plan accordingly. Please review this document with your crew and make your route selection. When you arrive at the Atikokan base, your crew and Interpreter will have time to decide the specifics of your trip ranging from daily distances, where you’ll camp each night, and options to extend or shorten certain sections of your route. While the exact route may have some flexibility, assigned entry points and exit points will not change and major route edits must be pre-approved. The day length in each section is to be used as a guideline. They do not need to be strictly adhered to. For example, if your crew wants to paddle more distance, they can select a route that suggests more days.
  • "Lac Des Mille Lacs Indians, Live Exclusively By

    "Lac Des Mille Lacs Indians, Live Exclusively By

    "A War without Bombs": The Government's Role in Damming and Flooding of Lac des Mille Lacs First Nation By Howard Adler A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Canadian Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario August 18, 2010 2010, Howard Adler Library and Archives Biblioth&que et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-71599-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-71599-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • A Study of Selected Fur Trade Sites and Artifacts, Voyageurs National Park and Environs, 2001-2002

    A Study of Selected Fur Trade Sites and Artifacts, Voyageurs National Park and Environs, 2001-2002

    FROM THINGS LEFT BEHIND: A STUDY OF SELECTED FUR TRADE SITES AND ARTIFACTS, VOYAGEURS NATIONAL PARK AND ENVIRONS, 2001-2002. by Douglas A. Birk, Senior Archaeologist/Historian Institute for Minnesota Archaeology 4522 Nokomis Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 5540 Jeffrey J. Richner, Archeologist National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska Issued jointly as: MIDWEST ARCHEOLOGICAL CENTER, TECHNICAL REPORT NUMBER 84 and INSTITUTE FOR MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGY, REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS NUMBER 606 16 November 2004 This document was prepared for: Voyageurs National Park National Park Service International Falls, Minnesota FROM THINGS LEFT BEHIND: A STUDY OF SELECTED FUR TRADE SITES AND ARTIFACTS, VOYAGEURS NATIONAL PARK AND ENVIRONS, 2001-2002. by Douglas A. Birk and Jeffrey J. Richner Recommended by: _______________________________________________________________________ Park Archeology Program Manager, Midwest Archeological Center Concurred by: ___________________________________________________________________________ Superintendent, Voyageurs National Park Approved by: ____________________________________________________________________________ Regional Director, Midwest Region MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This volume reports on work conducted by the National Park Service (NPS) and the Institute for Minnesota Archaeology (IMA) in 2001-2002 to extend knowledge of historic fur trade resources and activities within the area of Voyageurs National Park (VOYA). The project involved terrestrial and underwater archaeological investigations,
  • 2019 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book

    2019 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book

    2019 Atikokan Crown Land Route Book You are receiving this document because your crew has chosen to paddle in the Crown Lands or you are a crew of 9 to 11 people which can only travel into the Crown Lands. The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, requires a route selection well in advance of your trip. You must select your preferred route by the day your final payment is due so that we may submit it to the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) well in advance of your trip. The routes in this document allow us to better accommodate your crew and gives our Interpreters a general idea of where you want to go so that they may plan accordingly. Please review this document with your crew and make your route selection. When you arrive at the Atikokan base, your crew and Interpreter will have time to decide the specifics of your trip from daily distance to where you’ll camp each night. Your assigned entry points and exit points will not change and major route edits must be pre-approved. Canada is comprised of 89% Crown Land. It is all un-owned land, coast to coast in Canada. Locals refer to the area we paddle simply as “the Bush.” Weather and water levels in our area are constantly changing. Winter storms, aggressive beavers, and nearby dam levels all prevent us from guaranteeing the “easy”, “medium”, or “hard” rating of each route. Unforeseen early or late season environmental hazards may exist which could add to the level of difficulty. The day length in each section is to be used as a guideline.
  • Colonialism and Nineteenth-Century Flooding of Ojibwa Lands

    Colonialism and Nineteenth-Century Flooding of Ojibwa Lands

    "Deprived Of Part Of Their Living": Colonialism and Nineteenth-Century Flooding of Ojibwa Lands JOAN A. LOVISEK, LEO G. WAISBERG and TIM E. HOLZKAMM Treaty and Aboriginal Rights Research (TARR) Grand Council Treaty #3 INTRODUCTION The destruction of resources essential to the traditional Ojibwa economy has been attributed by many Algonquian scholars to the fur trade. Anthropologists and ethnohistorians have overlooked the destruc­ tion of the native economy from 19th-century flooding, and have not considered changes to the Canadian Ojibwa economy as part of a larger process of colonial transformation which appropriated Indian lands and resources. Indian Affairs records extensively illustrate how the diversi­ fied economy of the Boundary Waters Ojibwa was radically transformed by the damaging effects of colonial encapsulation. For Canadian anthropologists, flooding of Indian lands is usually seen as a 20th-century issue. In northern Canada, the impact of hydroelectric dams has been assessed for hunting bands. Mitigation, particularly in northern Quebec, has focused on the protection of a hunting-trapping resource base. A large literature has been generated on the contributions of hunting to the Cree economy (Charest 1982; Richardson 1975; Waldram 1988). Thus anthropological attention to flooding of hunting lands in the North in this century is well accepted. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to the effects of earlier flooding in southern Canada. During the late 19th century, dams were constructed in northwestern Ontario to facilitate navigation and the production of lumber, most destined for the Prairies. Before the arrival of anthropologists, dams caused immense damage to the Ojibwa economy, inducing shifts in settlement and subsistence.
  • Operations of the Geological Survey Fob

    Operations of the Geological Survey Fob

    SU JMARY REPORT OE' THE OPERATIONS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOB. THE YEAR 1892. l st J anuary, 1893. The Hon. T. MAYNE DALY, l\I.P., MinisLer of the Interior. Srn,- I have the honour, in compliance with Section 6 of the Act 53 VicLoria, Chap. XL, to submit a summary report of the proceed­ ings and work of the Geological corps during the year now closed. The work during 1892 has been for the most part a continuation and extension of that recorded in the preceding years 1890\ind 1891. The progress mn,de in working out the structural details, and map­ ping the districts in part exa,mined in tho e years has been satis­ factory, while some extensive and hitherto wholly unknown areas south of Lake Athabasca, and east of James' Bay have been examined with interesting results, while importanL additions have also been made to our know ledge of the geologic and geographic feature of these regions. The working field parties, during the past year, numbered fifteen, distributed as follows :- British Columbia. 1 North-western Alberta and Columbia Valley. l Between Lnke Athabasca and R eindeer Lake. 1 Ontario.. .. 4 Quebec. .. ............ ........... .... 3 East )fain.. 1 New Brunswick . 1 Nova Scotia. 3 As in previous years, Messrs. l\Iacoun, Ami, \Yeston and \Villimott have made investigations and collections in botrmy, palreontology and mineralogy, the particulars of which are given under the divisions named. Dr. G. M. Dawson's time and attention has been occupied, as in 1891, almost entirely with work in connection with the Behring Sea Commission, and he has, therefore, been unable todo any geological 1 2 A GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA.
  • 2.0 PARTICIPANTS in ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.1 Potentially Affected and Interested Stakeholders Rainy River Resources

    2.0 PARTICIPANTS in ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.1 Potentially Affected and Interested Stakeholders Rainy River Resources

    2.0 PARTICIPANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.1 Potentially Affected and Interested Stakeholders Rainy River Resources (RRR) has informed and involved the stakeholders in a variety of ways (Appendix D). The focus of early consultation was to introduce RRR, to inform citizens of the status of the exploration and potential mining-related activities, and to provide information regarding future consultation and engagement opportunities. Consultation activities then focused on gathering input for the Provincial and Federal Environmental Assessment (EA) process, and engaging stakeholders in the environmental baseline data collection as appropriate. Subsequent engagement was conducted to support the EA process and obtain feedback on the Rainy River Project (RRP) design and environmental mitigation strategies. The main stakeholders involved to date in the RRP include those with a direct interest in the RRP, and those who provided data for baseline environmental reports such as Municipal and Provincial government department representatives, community–based service providers, economic development agencies and other similar groups. The Provincial and Federal government representatives have been actively involved in the EA process to date. The range of stakeholders is expected to grow and will continue to evolve throughout RRP development to reflect varying levels of interest and opportunities over time. Stakeholders engaged by RRR to date include: Business, Community Groups and Environmental Organizations Ainsworth Lumber; Borderland Snowmobile
  • Socio-Demographic Profile of Rainy River District

    Socio-Demographic Profile of Rainy River District

    Socio-demographic Profile of Rainy River District Riverside Health Care Facilities October 2012 Riverside Health Care Facilities 1.0 SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF RAINY RIVER DISTRICT 1.1 Geography Covering the south-western corner of Northwestern Ontario, Rainy River District is bordered to the south by Rainy Lake and the American border with the State of Minnesota, to the north by Kenora District, to the west by the provincial border with Manitoba and to the East by Thunder Bay District (Figure 1). Figure 1 Spanning some 15,485 square kilometres, from its Eastern (Shebandowan) to Map of North West Local Health Integration Network and Western (Rainy River) border along Highway 11, the district stretches about 360 Rainy River District kilometres. By contrast, the distance between Windsor and Cornwall along Highway 401 is approximately 785 kilometres. 1.2 Population Distribution Almost four in ten people living in Rainy River District live in Fort Frances. Most of the remainder of the population lives in smaller communities along the Highway 11 corridor (Table 1). It is important to recognize that apart from the Couchiching First Nation, the overall population of Rainy River District decreased by almost 1,200 residents (5.5%) in the intercensal period (2006-2011). This population change is consistent with the rest of the North West region of the province: Kenora District (-10.6%) and Thunder Bay District (-2%). The population count of the City of Thunder Bay remained relatively the same (-0.7%). The District of Rainy River accounts for 9% of the population of Northwestern Ontario and about 0.2% of the Province of Ontario.
  • Northwestern Ontario

    Northwestern Ontario

    COFRDA REPORT 3312 NWOFTDU TECHNICAL REPORT 60 Landform Features in Northwestern Ontario R.A. Sims and K.A. Baldwin Forestry Canada. Ontario Region Sauli Sie, Marie. Ontario 1991 Canada-Ontario Forest Resource Development Agreement Entente sur la mise en valour de la ressource forestiere "Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1991 Catalogue No. Fu 29-25/3312E ISBN 0-662-1X607-9 ISSN 0847-2866 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Publication 4628 Copies of this publication are available at no charge from: Communications Services Great Lakes Forestry Centre Forestry Canada-Ontario Region P.O. Box 490 Sauli Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7 Northwestern Ontario Foresi Technology Development Unit Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources R-R- #1. 25th Side Road Thunder Bay. Ontario P7C 4T9 This report is based upon information and materials prepared under Project 33038, "Development of a Soils/Landfonn Course Relating to Northwestern Ontario-, carried out under the Research Development and Applications Sub-program of the Canada-Ontario Forest Resource Development Agreement. Sims R.A and Baldwin. K.A. 1991. Landform features in northwestern Ontario For. Can., Onl. Region. Saul: Sic. Marie. Onl. C0FRDA Rep. 3312. Oat. Min. Nat. Resour.,Thunder Bay. Om. NWOFTDU lech. Rep. 60. 63 p. ABSTRACT This report provides information on commonly encountered landform features in northwestern Ontario. A brief introduction is provided to the glacial history and current surficial geology of northwestern Onlano. Photographs are provided lo illustrate common landform features. For 13 common landform features, the following are summarized: typical landscape pattern, topographic expression, genesis, distribution in northwestern Ontario, material eomposilion (including comments on soil drainage and frost-heave hazard) and concerns related lo lorest management, Using the terminology of the Northwestern Ontario Korest Ecosystem Classification, soil and vegetation conditions related to each landform feature are noted.