Errors and Accuracy in Student Media

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Errors and Accuracy in Student Media View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@CalPoly Errors and Accuracy in Student Media: Identifying, Avoiding, and Correcting Common Reporting Errors A Senior Project presented to The Faculty of the Journalism Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science in Journalism By Sarah Gilmore March 2013 © Sarah Gilmore 2013 ABSTRACT Given the changing nature of journalism in today’s society, a “sink or swim” mentality has been adopted across publications throughout the media – it is imperative to keep up-to-date with changes that occur throughout the industry, or the fate of a publication may be in jeopardy. One key factor in keeping a given media outlet afloat in these uncertain times in journalism is accuracy, which in turn affects a publication’s perceived credibility. In order to maintain readership, it is vital that publications maintain a high standard of accuracy in reporting, which can be severely altered by the inclusion of errors. This study addresses the importance of avoiding and correcting errors in the media, and eXplores gaps in eXisting literature regarding accuracy and errors in student media. By utilizing interviews with eXperts in the field of student media, as well as a survey of sources cited in Mustang Daily, a daily student publication at California State University, San Luis Obispo, common errors, as well as causes of common errors, were identified. This paper presents recommendations for potential solutions for avoiding errors made in the media, as well as potential means for correcting errors once they are committed. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Statement of the Problem ……...………………………………………………………. 1 Background of the Problem ………………………………………..…………………. 1 Purpose of the Study ……………………….……………………………………………. 2 Setting for the Study ……………………………………..………………………………. 3 Research Questions ………………………………………………………………………. 3 Definition of Terms ………………………………………………………………………. 4 Organization of Study ………………………………………………………………….... 5 Chapter 2 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Common Errors in the Media ……………………………………………………….... 6 Causes of Errors in the Media ………………………………………………………... 7 Public Perception of Errors in the Media ………………………………………... 8 Avoiding Common Reporting Errors …………………….…………………….... 10 Correcting Reporting Errors ……………………………..……………………….... 12 Chapter 3 …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 Methodology ………………………………………………………….…………………………….... 18 Data Sources ……………………………………………………………….…………….... 18 Participants ………………………………………………...………………….... 18 Interview Design ………………………………………...………………….... 19 Data Collection ………………………………………………...……………….……….... 20 iii Subject Matter Experts ……………………………………………..…….... 20 Mustang Daily Questionnaire …………………………….…………….... 21 Media Accuracy Research Questions …….……...………………….... 21 Data Presentation ……………………………………..…………...………………….... 25 Interviews …………...……………………………………...………………….... 25 Questionnaire ………………………………………………...……...……….... 25 Scoring Protocol ………….………………………………………...………………….... 26 Limitations ……………………….…………………………………...………………….... 26 Delimitations ………………………………………………………...………………….... 26 Chapter 4 …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 Data Analysis …………………………………………………………………...………………….... 28 Description of Participating Experts in Related Fields ..……………….... 28 Managing …………………………………………………....………………….... 28 Advising ………………………………………...…………...………………….... 29 Student …………………………………………………...…….……………….... 29 Mustang Daily Accuracy Questionnaire ………………………..…………….... 29 Media Accuracy Data ………………………..…………………………………….….... 38 Mustang Daily Accuracy Survey ……………………….…………..…………….... 45 Chapter 5 …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 48 Discussion and Recommendations ………………………..……………………..……….... 48 Summary ………………………..………………………………………………………...... 48 Discussion ………………………………………………………………………………...... 49 Recommendations for Practice ………………..………………………………...... 52 iv Training and Education ………………..………………………………....... 53 Editing Protocol ………………..…………………………….……………...... 53 Corrections Policy ………………..………………………………………....... 54 Study Conclusion ………………..…………………………………………………......... 54 References ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56 Appendix …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 58 A. Interview Transcript: Paul Bittick ….……………………………………………......... 58 B. Interview Transcript: Brady Teufel ………..……………………………………......... 63 C. Interview Transcript: Brian De Los Santos ……..……………………………......... 70 D. Survey Data ………………..……………………...………………………………………......... 74 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Working titles, by respondent ............................................................................................. 19 Table 2. Examples of common errors in student media, by respondent ............................ 40 Table 3. Causes of common errors in student media, by respondent .................................. 41 Table 4. Public perception of errors in student media, by respondent ............................... 42 Table 5. Avoiding common reporting errors, by respondent .................................................. 43 Table 6. Correcting common reporting errors, by respondent .............................................. 45 vi Chapter 1 Introduction Statement of the Problem This study focuses on various aspects of accuracy in the media, specifically addressing the issue of sacrificing accuracy in the media as a result of errors. The topic of accuracy in the media has been scrutinized the public eye for many decades, and continues to be a prevalent issue. “Long-running studies show that just over half of US newspaper stories contain at least one error” (Giles, 2012). Errors have plagued the credibility of nearly all publications – large or small – at some point in time, by diminishing the accuracy of the content published. Whether it is by misquoting a source or publishing a factual inaccuracy, errors in the media have been a great source of problems surrounding the issues of accuracy and credibility for publications worldwide. Background of the Problem The eXisting literature regarding accuracy and errors in the media is relatively general and mainly focuses on the issue of correcting errors once they are committed. By getting down to the root of the problem – what common errors are and how they come to occur – publications can work toward avoiding errors altogether and improving accuracy, as well as perceived credibility. Additionally, current literature greatly lacks research and findings regarding errors and accuracy in student media. 1 Currently, the public is losing confidence in the media (Hatfield, 2005, p. 4). “We’re losing our credibility because sometimes we don’t know what we’re talking about – but then we act like we do” (Hatfield, 2005, p. 4). According to Berinstein (2006), errors in publications provide a “silver lining” for the media by calling for a higher standard of accuracy in reporting (np). Because the media industry is currently in the midst of major changes, leaving the future of many publications in question, it is imperative to maintain high levels of readership. Accuracy and credibility play a large role in upholding readership, so conducting research on how to preserve accuracy and avoid errors is vital to the future of publications in a rapidly changing industry. Purpose of the Study According to current literature on the topic of accuracy in the media, errors committed can lead to a negative public perception of a publication, as well as a variety of negative consequences for those who the published error may potentially affect. These errors can negatively alter a publication’s readership, and trust in the media has been declining for decades as a result. The consequences of errors are not eXclusive to the mainstream media. The issues that go along with errors in reporting also affect the accuracy and credibility of student media. By investigating what errors are most commonly made in a publication’s content, as well as what the causes of the errors are, media outlets can work toward improving the accuracy of their content. Learning how these common errors can be avoided, as well as corrected, can also benefit a publication’s accuracy. In addition to 2 improving a publication’s accuracy, the benefits of this research can also enhance a publication’s perceived credibility, and in turn, improve readership. Setting for the Study This study was conducted as part of the data collection for a Senior Project at California Polytechnic State University located in San Luis Obispo, California. The study will use the four-year university’s daily student newspaper, Mustang Daily, as a case study. Interviews were also conducted with Mustang Daily students, advisers, and sources, as well as professionals in the field of journalism. These participants were each asked the same set of questions and probes. The study is specifically designed to answer the research questions and fill the gaps in previous literature on the topic of accuracy and errors in the media. Research Questions The study used the following research questions to answer fundamental gaps in the eXisting literature on the topic of accuracy and errors in the media. Each question was created after investigating the eXisting information on the topic in order to acquire additional pertinent and necessary
Recommended publications
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY JOURNAL of ECONOMICS Vol
    THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Vol. CXX November 2005 Issue 4 Downloaded from A MEASURE OF MEDIA BIAS* TIM GROSECLOSE AND JEFFREY MILYO We measure media bias by estimating ideological scores for several major http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/ media outlets. To compute this, we count the times that a particular media outlet cites various think tanks and policy groups, and then compare this with the times that members of Congress cite the same groups. Our results show a strong liberal bias: all of the news outlets we examine, except Fox News’ Special Report and the Washington Times, received scores to the left of the average member of Congress. Consistent with claims made by conservative critics, CBS Evening News and the New York Times received scores far to the left of center. The most centrist media outlets were PBS NewsHour, CNN’s Newsnight, and ABC’s Good Morning Amer- ica; among print outlets, USA Today was closest to the center. All of our findings at University of Rochester on October 23, 2014 refer strictly to news content; that is, we exclude editorials, letters, and the like. “The editors in Los Angeles killed the story. They told Witcover that it didn’t ‘come off’ and that it was an ‘opinion’ story....Thesolution was simple, they told him. All he had to do was get other people to make the same points and draw the same conclusions and then write the article in their words” (empha- sis in original). Timothy Crouse, Boys on the Bus [1973, p. 116]. Do the major media outlets in the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Investigative Visits to Non- Residential Addresses Claimed by Registered Voters in Southern Nevada and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    No. 20-1598 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________________________________________________ PROJECT VERITAS ACTION FUND, Petitioner, v. RACHEL S. ROLLINS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, Respondent. ________________________________________ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT __________________________________________________________ AMICUS BRIEF OF ACCURACY IN MEDIA, COOLIDGE-REAGAN FOUNDATION, LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE, AND PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________________________________________________________ DAN BACKER* CHALMERS & ADAMS LLC 441 N. LEE ST., SUITE 300 Alexandria, VA 22314 (202) 210-5431 [email protected] Counsel of Record for Amici Curiae LEGAL PRINTERS LLC ! Washington, DC ! 202-747-2400 ! legalprinters.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................... iii INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE ........................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................. 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ................................. 4 ARGUMENT .............................................................. 7 I. THIS COURT SHOULD GRANT CERTIORARI TO AFFIRM THE FUNDAMENTAL FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SURREPTITIOUSLY RECORD GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES. ............................................ 7 A. This Court Should Hold that the Right to Record in a Place Where a Person Otherwise Has the Right to Be Present is a Form of
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Concept of Objectivity
    National Llbrary BHIW~&nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Canadian Theses Service Service des theses canadiennes Onawa, Can& K1 A OFJ4*, NOTICE The quality of this microform is heavily dependem.upon the Laqualit6 de cette microforme depend grandernent de la quality of the ong'.~althesis submitted for microfilming. qualitb de la these soumise au microfilmage. Nous avons Every effcrt has been made to ensure the highest quality of tout fait pour assurer une qualit6 supbrieure de reproduc. reproduction possible. tion. I! pages are missing, contact the university whic dgranted S'il manque des pages, vwillez mmmuniquer avec the degree. I'universit6 qui a confkrb le grade. Some pages may have indistinct print especially if the La qualit6 d'impress~onde certaines pages peut laisser a onginal pages were typed with a prtypewriter ribbon or desirer, surtout si les pages originales ont 616 dactylogra- it the university sent us an inferior photmpy. phitiles A-raide d'un ruban us6 ou si runiversitb nous a talt parvenir une photocopie de qualit6 inferieure. keproduction tn fult or in part of th~smicroform is La reproduction, mCme partielle, de cette microforme est by the Canadran Copyright Act, R S C. 1970, c. remed30, and soumise a la Loi canadienne sur le droit d'auteur, SRC subsequent amendments. 1970, c C-30, et ses amendements bubsbquents OWECt IVITY IS A,MERICAN JOURSALISM \ B.A.. Beijing Broadcasting Ihrtiture, 1984 THESIS SL-BMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF .M.ASTER OF ARTS (COMMUNICATION) in the DepartmenP of Communication Zhao Yuezhi 1989 S1;LIOY FRXSER UNIVERSITY April 1989 .+!I rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust and Journalism in a Digital Environment
    Trust and Journalism in a Digital Environment Paper Bernd Blöbaum Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2014 2 Acknowledgments The major part of this paper has been written in the upper reading room of the Bodleian Library in Oxford. I am very grateful for having the privilege to work as Visiting Fellow at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University during Trinity term 2013. David Levy, Robert Picard, Nael Jebril and the other researchers, visiting fellows and journalism fellows as well as the administrative staff of the institute provided an inspiring and supporting environment for my research. Many thanks to all of them (and to Hannah Middendorf (University of Münster) for language editing). The Reuters Institute is an exceptional place to study with special people who explore the different forms of journalism and its changes with great passion. You can trust them. 3 Content Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................... 3 List of figures ........................................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Journalism
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings/Pew Research Center Forum
    1 BROOKINGS/PEW RESEARCH CENTER FORUM THE BIENNIAL PEW MEDIA SURVEY: HOW NEWS HABITS CHANGED IN 2004 Tuesday, June 8, 2004 10:00 - 11:30 a.m. Washington, D.C. [TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED FROM A TAPE RECORDING] 2 C O N T E N T S Moderator: RON NESSEN Journalist in Residence, The Brookings Institution Presentation: ANDREW KOHUT Director, The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Panelists: STEPHEN HESS Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution SUSAN PAGE Washington Bureau Chief, USA Today TOM ROSENSTIEL Director, Project for Excellence in Journalism 3 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. NESSEN: Good morning. Welcome to the Brookings Institution and welcome to this morning's forum, at which the Pew Research Center's biennial survey of the media habits of Americans is being released and discussed. This survey of 3,000 Americans was conducted between April 19th and May 12th. And we want to give a special welcome this morning to those who are watching the forum on C-SPAN. In case anyone here in the audience didn't get one, there are copies of the survey just outside--embargoed for 10 o'clock, and it is 10 o'clock, so the embargo has been lifted. For those of you who are watching at home, the results are available on the Pew Web site. You can link to it from the Brookings Web site. And also, by this afternoon, you'll find on the Brookings Web site a full transcript of this forum. Our format this morning will be, first of all, Andy Kohut, the director of the Pew Research Center for People and the Press, will announce and explain the findings of the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Liberal Media the Propaganda Model of News
    1 MEDIA EDUCATION F O U N D A T I O N 60 Masonic St. Northampton, MA 01060 | TEL 800.897.0089 | [email protected] | www.mediaed.org The Myth of the Liberal Media The Propaganda Model of News Transcript [Sound bites of different people talking about the “liberal media”] JUSTIN LEWIS: The role of the news media is essential to the modern democratic process. For most people, the news media are the dominant source of information about the world. They tell us what matters. They tell who matters. The way we vote, the way we answer opinion polls, this is based largely on media information. So quality of a democracy now depends on the information they provide. EDWARD HERMAN: The mainstream media really represent an elite interest and they serve those elite interests in a way that can be described as carrying out a propaganda function. NOAM CHOMSKY: If you want to understand the way some system works, you look at its institutional structure. How is organized? How is it controlled? How is it funded, and so on. JUSTIN LEWIS: The big question, of course, is: what kind of information do we get? Does it come from a diverse range of perspectives, or are some views dominant and others excluded? The most commonly repeated theory is that the media tilt towards the left or to the liberal end of the political spectrum. [TEXT] The idea of “the liberal media” is a commonly held belief. JUSTIN LEWIS: What’s curious about this view is that there’s almost no evidence to support it.
    [Show full text]
  • Criticising Journalism
    Does criticism in digital spaces matter to journalism? Legacy news media face intense criticism on social networks or blogs, while their accountability towards the public is weak. This dissertation explores the contribution of digital media critics and their criticisms to journalism, through qualitative interviews with journalists, critics and media accountability agents. The main findings show how journalists negotiate a variety of criticisms (from the rational to the uncivil) and critics (with varying expertise and influence) in digital spaces. The study is relevant today because digitality complicates the journalist-critic relationship as critical text from the public circulate in the same universe as journalistic text. What this means is that journalists must find new ways to cope with the logics of digital ARTWORK BY GODFREY MWAMPEMBWA (GADO) platforms, such as social networks and blogs. At the same time, news professionals must respond to pressure to conform to social norms such as equity in gender representation in the news, that comes through, for example, hashtag campaigns on social networks. ISBN 978-91-7867-053-6 (print) | ISBN 978-91-7867-063-5 (pdf) LAYOUT & PRINT: DOCTORAL THESIS | Karlstad University Studies | 2019:29 UNIVERSITY PRINTING OFFICE, KARLSTAD, 2019 Criticising Journalism Does criticism in digital spaces matter to journalism? Legacy news media face intense criticism on social networks or blogs, while their accountability towards the public is weak. This dissertation explores the contribution of digital media critics and their criticisms to journalism, through qualitative interviews with journalists, critics and media accountability agents. The main findings show Criticising Journalism how journalists negotiate a variety of criticisms (from the rational to the uncivil) and critics (with varying expertise and influence) in digital spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • News Media Incentives, Coverage of Government, and the Growth of Government
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 News Media Incentives, Coverage of Government, and the Growth of Government —————— ✦ —————— DANIEL SUTTER oth the form and the content of the news industry changed dramatically in the twentieth century. Americans at the end of the nineteenth century received Bnews from newspapers that, although no longer funded by political parties, typically were openly political in their coverage. Today Americans receive news through new media—radio, television, and the Internet—and from news organiza- tions that strive for fairness and balance in reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • SEARCHING for a PLACE in the JOURNALISTIC SUN: a Delplll
    SEARCHING FOR A PLACE IN THE JOURNALISTIC SUN: A DELPlll STUDYOF FUTURE ETHICAL ISSUES FOR THE NEWS MEDIA By: REBECCA JEANNE TALLENT Bachelor of Arts in Education University of Central Oklahoma Edmond, Oklahoma May, 1975 Master of Education University of Central Oklahoma Edmond, Oklahoma May, 1977 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of Oklahoma State University " in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION July, 1995 OKLAHOMA STAT.I!; U.Nl V!i.J;fbl'J."I SEARCHING FOR A PLACE IN THE JOURNALISTIC SUN: A DELPHI STUDY OF FUTURE ETHICAL ISSUES FOR THE NEWS MEDIA Thesis Approved: dbO?hbh (.~ Dean of the Graduate College 11 PREFACE This study offers views concerning the future direction ofjournalism/mass communication ethics primarily through the opinions of a panel of experts. Specifically, this study offers views on what ethical problems journalists (reporters, editors, producers, TV news anchors, managers, students, and educators) are likely to face in the near future, and offers some suggestions on how to deal with these prospective problems. I would like to thank Dr. Charles Fleming, my advisor and dissertation chairman, for his wisdom, guidance, patience, and humor throughout this study. I would also like to thank Dr. Edward Welch, Dr. Maureen Nemecek, and Dr. Thomas Karman, my committee members, for their contributions to this study and to my academic experiences at Oklahoma State University. In addition, thanks go to those who participated in the pilot study -- Ann Dee Lee, Arnold Hamilton, and Dennie Hall. Their intelligent feedback helped enormously as I outlined and refined the study questions in Round II.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo Credits Typically Run Sideways up the Border of the Image, Or Appear in the Gutter Or on Another Page Altogether
    PHOTOTRUTH OR PHOTOFICTION? Ethics and Media Imagery in the Digital Age Tom Wheeler School of Journalism and Communication University of Oregon LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS 2002 Mahwah, New Jersey London Acquisitions Editor: Linda Bathgate Textbook Marketing Manager: Marisol Kozlovski Editorial Assistant: Karin Bates Cover Design: Kathryn Houghtaling Lacey Textbook Production Manager: Paul Smolenski Full-Service & Composition: UG / GGS Information Services, Inc. Text and Cover Printer: Hamilton Printing Company This book was typeset in 11/13 pt. Times Roman, Bold, and Italic. The heads were typeset in ITC Serif Gothic Bold, ITC Serif Gothic Light, and ITC Serif Gothic Regular. Copyright © 2002 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the book may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microform, retrieval system, or any other means, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers 10 Industrial Avenue Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wheeler, Tom Phototruth or photofiction? : ethics and media imagery in the digital age / Tom Wheeler. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8058-4261-6 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Photojournalism—moral and ethical aspects. 2. Image processing—Digital techniques—Moral and ethical aspects. 3. Mass media criticism. I. Title. TR820 .W4 2002 174'. 9070—dc21 2002017492 Books published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates are printed on acid-free paper, and their bindings
    [Show full text]
  • CQR Trust in Journalism
    Published by CQ Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc. www.cqresearcher.com Trust in Media Can news outlets regain the public’s confidence? ournalism is facing a credibility crisis. Declining faith in government and other institutions and a decades-long assault by conservatives have hurt mainstream news J outlets. And President Trump has called journalists “the enemy of the American people.” Recent incidents involv - ing public figures, including a Montana congressional candidate’s alleged assault on a reporter, have underscored the hostility that journalists face. Some traditional media also have suffered from self-inflicted wounds by blurring the lines between news and commentary and ignoring the interests of rural readers to focus Supporters of then-presidential candidate Donald on well-off urbanites. Ad revenue and subscriptions at newspapers Trump protest alleged bias by CNN at the cable network’s offices in Hollywood, Calif., on Oct. 22, have plummeted, in part due to the rise of the internet and 2016. As president, Trump frequently criticizes the media. “If the media’s job is to . tell the truth, the media deserves a very, very big fat failing grade,” changing consumer habits. Meanwhile, social media have fostered he said at a rally marking his 100th day in office. “echo c hambers” in which people seek out news that affirms their beliefs. Journalists and those studying the news business say main - I stream outlets must be more transparent about how they do their THIS REPORT N jobs and more skillful at explaining events to
    [Show full text]