DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Histone DNA Repair Code: H4k20me2 Makes Its Mark Karissa L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding the Histone DNA Repair Code: H4k20me2 Makes Its Mark Karissa L Published OnlineFirst June 1, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 Minireview Molecular Cancer Research Understanding the Histone DNA Repair Code: H4K20me2 Makes Its Mark Karissa L. Paquin and Niall G. Howlett Abstract Chromatin is a highly compact structure that must be describe the writers, erasers, and readers of this important rapidly rearranged in order for DNA repair proteins to access chromatin mark as well as the combinatorial histone post- sites of damage and facilitate timely and efficient repair. translational modifications that modulate H4K20me recog- Chromatin plasticity is achieved through multiple processes, nition. Finally, we discuss the central role of H4K20me in including the posttranslational modification of histone tails. determining if DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are repaired In recent years, the impact of histone posttranslational mod- by the error-prone, nonhomologous DNA end joining path- ification on the DNA damage response has become increas- way or the error-free, homologous recombination pathway. ingly well recognized, and chromatin plasticity has been firmly This review article discusses the regulation and function of linked to efficient DNA repair. One particularly important H4K20me2 in DNA DSB repair and outlines the components histone posttranslational modification process is methylation. and modifications that modulate this important chromatin Here, we focus on the regulation and function of H4K20 mark and its fundamental impact on DSB repair pathway methylation (H4K20me) in the DNA damage response and choice. Mol Cancer Res; 16(9); 1335–45. Ó2018 AACR. Introduction recruitment of chromatin reader proteins and/or chromatin remo- deling complexes, which can lead to marked changes in chroma- Chromatin is a highly organized and condensed structure that tin structure and compaction. Single and combinatorial PTMs can allows billions of base pairs of DNA to be tightly packaged into the have distinct signaling and cellular outcomes. Combinatorial nuclei of eukaryotic cells. The basic subunit of chromatin is the marks add to the variability and complexity of chromatin recog- nucleosome, an octamer of histones around which 146 bp of nition and plasticity (3, 4). In this review, we will discuss one DNA is wrapped 1.7 times. Each nucleosome contains two copies aspect of chromatin plasticity, namely histone PTM. Specifically, each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Histones are highly we will focus on the dimethylation of histone H4 lysine 20 in conserved among eukaryotes, emphasizing their importance (1). mammalian cell lineages and how this particular PTM has become Chromatin cannot be a rigid and unchanging structure, however. increasingly recognized as a major determinant of DNA repair. For It is highly dynamic in order to facilitate DNA replication, tran- more comprehensive reviews of chromatin plasticity and DNA scription, and repair. Chromatin plasticity is a necessity, as with- repair, please refer to the following excellent reviews (5–7). out it, DNA-interacting proteins would not be able to access this tightly condensed structure. Chromatin plasticity is facilitated by nucleosome repositioning, histone exchange, and the posttrans- DNA DSB Repair lational modification (PTM) of histone tails. Nucleosome repo- DNA damage can arise as a result of endogenous agents, such as sitioning involves the physical sliding of nucleosomes along the reactive oxygen species, a byproduct of normal cellular processes, DNA or their eviction. In histone exchange, histone variants are or by exogenous means, such as exposure to UV light. DNA substituted for the canonical histones H2A, H2B, H3, or H4. For damage must be repaired in an efficient and timely manner in example, H2A can be substituted with the variant H2AX upon the order to continue normal cellular processes like replication and formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB; ref. 2). Histone transcription. Although there are many distinct types of DNA PTM is the addition of small molecules, such as acetyl-, methyl-, damage, here we will focus on DNA DSBs. DSBs arise upon and phospho-groups, or small proteins, such as SUMO (small cellular exposure to ionizing radiation and as a consequence of ubiquitin-like modifier) and ubiquitin to the tails of histones, replication fork collapse. DSBs can also arise transiently during which extend from the core nucleosome. These PTMs change DNA repair processes, including nucleotide excision repair and chromatin structure in several ways, for example, by modulating interstrand cross-link repair (8). Upon DSB formation, free ends the strength of histone–DNA interactions, and by facilitating the of broken DNA are recognized by the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex, which recruits the ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) kinase (9, 10). ATM phosphorylates a histone variant Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, called H2AX on serine 139, forming gH2AX (11, 12). gH2AX was Rhode Island. one of the first recognized histone PTMs and has been extensively Corresponding Author: Niall G. Howlett, University of Rhode Island, 120 Flagg studied in relation to DSB repair (11). Mediator of DNA damage Road, Kingston, RI 02881. Phone: 401-874-4306; Fax: 401-874-2065; E-mail: checkpoint 1 (MDC1) recognizes gH2AX via its BRCA1 C-Termi- [email protected] nus (BRCT) domain (13). MDC1 subsequently recruits additional doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 molecules of ATM via its forkhead-associated (FHA) domain; Ó2018 American Association for Cancer Research. ATM phosphorylates additional H2AX molecules, thereby www.aacrjournals.org 1335 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst June 1, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 Paquin and Howlett amplifying the gH2AX signal up to two megabases proximal to (lysine methyltransferase 5A), a SET-domain (Su(var)3-9, the DSB site (refs. 13–15; Fig. 1A). As one of the first steps in Enhancer-of-zeste and Trithorax) containing methyltransferase DSB repair, H2AX phosphorylation is widely used as a marker for (Table 1). KMT5A, similar to all methyltransferases, is referred DSB formation. to as a writer of chromatin marks. It has recently been shown that DSBs are repaired by one of two ways: homologous recombi- KMT5A prefers the entire nucleosome as its substrate, rather than nation (HR) or nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). HR is individual H4 histones or peptides, and that it interacts with H2A an error-free repair pathway that uses a homologous DNA and H2B in order to monomethylate H4K20 (41–44). Loss of sequence as a template to repair damaged DNA (16). HR is a Kmt5a in both fly and mouse results in embryonic lethality cell-cycle–dependent pathway, occurring primarily during (45, 46). Studies have shown that with knockout of Kmt5a, S-phase due to the presence of homologous DNA in the sister H4K20 di- and trimethylation are downregulated (45). In HeLa chromatid. Briefly, upon gH2AX phosphorylation, the MRN cells, KMT5A knockdown results in reduced 53BP1 recruitment to complex, CtBP-interacting protein (CtIP), exonuclease 1 (EXO1), DSBs (47, 48). In addition, Kmt5a knockout embryonic stem cells and DNA replication/helicase protein 2 (DNA2) all promote 50-30 and KMT5A-depleted HeLa and U2OS cells display increased DNA end resection, resulting in the generation of 30 single- DSBs and gH2AX formation, even in the absence of exposure to stranded overhangs on each strand (ssDNA; refs. 17–21). The DNA-damaging agents (45, 49, 50). This is likely an accumulation ssDNA overhangs are first coated by replication protein A (RPA) to of spontaneous DNA damage throughout the cell cycle, which protect against nucleolytic degradation. The major DNA strand remains unrepaired due to lack of H4K20 methylation (45). recombinase, RAD51, is subsequently loaded onto ssDNA in a KMT5A-depleted U2OS cells have increased cell-cycle checkpoint process facilitated by functional homologs of the yeast Rad52 activation, decreased cell-cycle progression, and accumulated in epistasis group and the BRCA2 protein (22–24). RAD51 forms a S-phase, also in the absence of DNA damage (50). nucleoprotein filament coating the ssDNA, and a displacement loop (D-loop) is formed upon invasion of the ssDNA into the KMT5B/C. The H4K20me2 mark has been shown to be involved complementary sister chromatid duplex, referred to as the syn- in DNA repair. This histone mark is found throughout the aptic complex (22–26). New DNA is then synthesized using the nucleus; however, it has been reported to be enriched at sites of sister chromatid as a template, and Holliday junctions (branched DNA damage (51). Globally, Kmt5b (Aliases: Suv4-20h1, heteroduplex DNA intermediates comprising newly synthesized SUV420H1) and Kmt5c (Aliases: Suv4-20h2, SUV420H2) are DNA on the invading strand and the template strand) are responsible for H4K20 di- and trimethylation, respectively resolved, resulting in a duplicate of the sister chromatid (gene (52). KMT5B/C has been shown to catalyze dimethylation more conversion), with no loss of genetic information (ref. 16; Fig. 1B). efficiently than trimethylation in vitro (38, 39, 53). This suggests Conversely, NHEJ is typically an error-prone pathway that that additional proteins may be necessary for efficient H4K20 simply ligates the free ends of broken DNA. NHEJ occurs in all trimethylation, or that another HMT catalyzes this reaction phases of the cell cycle and can result in catastrophic events such as (38, 52). Although
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predicting Double-Strand DNA Breaks Using Epigenome Marks Or DNA at Kilobase Resolution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/149039; this version posted June 12, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Predicting double-strand DNA breaks using epigenome marks or DNA at kilobase resolution Rapha¨elMourad1 and Olivier Cuvier1 April 10, 2017 1 Laboratoire de Biologie Mol´eculaireEucaryote (LBME), CNRS, Universit´ePaul Sabatier (UPS), 31000 Toulouse, France Abstract Double-strand breaks (DSBs) result from the attack of both DNA strands by multiple sources, includ- ing exposure to ionizing radiation or reactive oxygen species. DSBs can cause abnormal chromosomal rearrangements which are linked to cancer development, and hence represent an important issue. Recent techniques allow the genome-wide mapping of DSBs at high resolution, enabling the comprehensive study of DSB origin. However these techniques are costly and challenging. Hence we devised a computational approach to predict DSBs using the epigenomic and chromatin context, for which public data are available from the ENCODE project. We achieved excellent prediction accuracy (AUC = 0:97) at high resolution (< 1 kb), and showed that only chromatin accessibility and H3K4me1 mark were sufficient for highly accurate prediction (AUC = 0:95). We also demonstrated the better sensitivity of DSB predictions com- pared to BLESS experiments. We identified chromatin accessibility, activity and long-range contacts as best predictors. In addition, our work represents the first step toward unveiling the "cis-DNA repairing" code underlying DSBs, paving the way for future studies of cis-elements involved in DNA damage and repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Histone Modification-Specific Interaction Domains As an Alternative to Antibodies
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Method Application of histone modification-specific interaction domains as an alternative to antibodies Goran Kungulovski,1 Ina Kycia,1,4 Raluca Tamas,1 Renata Z. Jurkowska,1 Srikanth Kudithipudi,1 Chisato Henry,2 Richard Reinhardt,3 Paul Labhart,2 and Albert Jeltsch1 1Institute of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; 2Active Motif, Carlsbad, California 92008, USA; 3Max-Planck-Genomzentrum Koln,€ 50829 Koln,€ Germany Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of histones constitute a major chromatin indexing mechanism, and their proper characterization is of highest biological importance. So far, PTM-specific antibodies have been the standard reagent for studying histone PTMs despite caveats such as lot-to-lot variability of specificity and binding affinity. Herein, we suc- cessfully employed naturally occurring and engineered histone modification interacting domains for detection and identification of histone PTMs and ChIP-like enrichment of different types of chromatin. Our results demonstrate that histone interacting domains are robust and highly specific reagents that can replace or complement histone modification antibodies. These domains can be produced recombinantly in Escherichia coli at low cost and constant quality. Protein design of reading domains allows for generation of novel specificities, addition of affinity tags, and preparation of PTM binding pocket variants as matching negative controls, which is not possible with antibodies. [Supplemental material is available for this article.] The unstructured N-terminal tails of histones protrude from the yielding false negative results. When undocumented, the cross- core nucleosome and harbor complex patterns of post-translational reactivity with related or unrelated marks and the combinatorial modifications (PTMs) (Kouzarides 2007; Margueron and Reinberg effect of neighboring marks compromise the application of anti- 2010; Bannister and Kouzarides 2011; Tan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Hmof-Dependent Histone H4 Lysine 16 Acetylation in the Maintenance of TMS1/ASC Gene Activity
    Research Article Role of hMOF-Dependent Histone H4 Lysine 16 Acetylation in the Maintenance of TMS1/ASC Gene Activity Priya Kapoor-Vazirani, Jacob D. Kagey, Doris R. Powell, and Paula M. Vertino Department of Radiation Oncology and the Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia Abstract occurring aberrantly during carcinogenesis, is associated with gene Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes in human inactivation (4). Histone modifications can also act synergistically cancers is associated with aberrant methylation of promoter or antagonistically to define the transcription state of genes. region CpG islands and local alterations in histone mod- Acetylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with transcrip- ifications. However, the mechanisms that drive these events tionally active promoters and an open chromatin configuration (5). remain unclear. Here, we establish an important role for Both dimethylation and trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16Ac) and the histone (H3K4me2and H3K4me3) have been linked to actively transcribing acetyltransferase hMOF in the regulation of TMS1/ASC,a genes, although recent studies indicate that CpG island–associated proapoptotic gene that undergoes epigenetic silencing in promoters are marked by H3K4me2regardless of the transcrip- human cancers. In the unmethylated and active state, the tional status (6, 7). In contrast, methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 TMS1 CpG island is spanned by positioned nucleosomes and and 27 are associated with transcriptionally inactive promoters and marked by histone H3K4 methylation. H4K16Ac was uniquely condensed closed chromatin (8, 9). Interplay between histone localized to two sharp peaks that flanked the unmethylated modifications and DNA methylation defines the transcriptional CpG island and corresponded to strongly positioned nucle- potential of a particular chromatin domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleeping Beauty Transposon Mutagenesis Identifies Genes That
    Sleeping Beauty transposon mutagenesis identifies PNAS PLUS genes that cooperate with mutant Smad4 in gastric cancer development Haruna Takedaa,b, Alistair G. Rustc,d, Jerrold M. Warda, Christopher Chin Kuan Yewa, Nancy A. Jenkinsa,e, and Neal G. Copelanda,e,1 aDivision of Genomics and Genetics, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138673; bDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan; cExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1HH, United Kingdom; dTumour Profiling Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London SW3 6JB, United Kingdom; and eCancer Research Program, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030 Contributed by Neal G. Copeland, February 27, 2016 (sent for review October 15, 2015; reviewed by Yoshiaki Ito and David A. Largaespada) Mutations in SMAD4 predispose to the development of gastroin- animal models that mimic human GC, researchers have infected testinal cancer, which is the third leading cause of cancer-related mice with H. pylori and then, treated them with carcinogens. They deaths. To identify genes driving gastric cancer (GC) development, have also used genetic engineering to develop a variety of trans- we performed a Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon mutagenesis genic and KO mouse models of GC (10). Smad4 KO mice are one + − screen in the stomach of Smad4 / mutant mice. This screen iden- GC model that has been of particular interest to us (11, 12). tified 59 candidate GC trunk drivers and a much larger number of Heterozygous Smad4 KO mice develop polyps in the pyloric re- candidate GC progression genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Histone H4 Lysine 20 Mono-Methylation Directly Facilitates Chromatin Openness and Promotes Transcription of Housekeeping Genes
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25051-2 OPEN Histone H4 lysine 20 mono-methylation directly facilitates chromatin openness and promotes transcription of housekeeping genes Muhammad Shoaib 1,8,9, Qinming Chen2,9, Xiangyan Shi 3, Nidhi Nair1, Chinmayi Prasanna 2, Renliang Yang2,4, David Walter1, Klaus S. Frederiksen 5, Hjorleifur Einarsson1, J. Peter Svensson 6, ✉ ✉ ✉ Chuan Fa Liu 2, Karl Ekwall6, Mads Lerdrup 7 , Lars Nordenskiöld 2 & Claus S. Sørensen 1 1234567890():,; Histone lysine methylations have primarily been linked to selective recruitment of reader or effector proteins that subsequently modify chromatin regions and mediate genome functions. Here, we describe a divergent role for histone H4 lysine 20 mono-methylation (H4K20me1) and demonstrate that it directly facilitates chromatin openness and accessibility by disrupting chromatin folding. Thus, accumulation of H4K20me1 demarcates highly accessible chromatin at genes, and this is maintained throughout the cell cycle. In vitro, H4K20me1-containing nucleosomal arrays with nucleosome repeat lengths (NRL) of 187 and 197 are less compact than unmethylated (H4K20me0) or trimethylated (H4K20me3) arrays. Concordantly, and in contrast to trimethylated and unmethylated tails, solid-state NMR data shows that H4K20 mono-methylation changes the H4 conformational state and leads to more dynamic histone H4-tails. Notably, the increased chromatin accessibility mediated by H4K20me1 facilitates gene expression, particularly of housekeeping genes. Altogether, we show how the methy- lation state of a single histone H4 residue operates as a focal point in chromatin structure control. While H4K20me1 directly promotes chromatin openness at highly transcribed genes, it also serves as a stepping-stone for H4K20me3-dependent chromatin compaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Brain Organoids Reveal Accelerated Development of Cortical Neuron Classes As a Shared Feature of Autism Risk Genes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.10.376509; this version posted November 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Human brain organoids reveal accelerated development of cortical neuron classes as a shared feature of autism risk genes Bruna Paulsen1,2,†, Silvia Velasco1,2,†,#, Amanda J. Kedaigle1,2,3,†, Martina Pigoni1,2,†, Giorgia Quadrato4,5 Anthony Deo2,6,7,8, Xian Adiconis2,3, Ana Uzquiano1,2, Kwanho Kim1,2,3, Sean K. Simmons2,3, Kalliopi Tsafou2, Alex Albanese9, Rafaela Sartore1,2, Catherine Abbate1,2, Ashley Tucewicz1,2, Samantha Smith1,2, Kwanghun Chung9,10,11,12, Kasper Lage2,13, Aviv Regev3,14, Joshua Z. Levin2,3, Paola Arlotta1,2,# † These authors contributed equally to the work # Correspondence should be addressed to [email protected] and [email protected] 1 Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 3 Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 4 Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; 5 Eli and Edythe Broad CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. 6 Department of Psychiatry,
    [Show full text]
  • Histone Crosstalk Between H3s10ph and H4k16ac Generates a Histone Code That Mediates Transcription Elongation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Histone Crosstalk between H3S10ph and H4K16ac Generates a Histone Code that Mediates Transcription Elongation Alessio Zippo,1 Riccardo Serafini,1 Marina Rocchigiani,1 Susanna Pennacchini,1 Anna Krepelova,1 and Salvatore Oliviero1,* 1Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare Universita` di Siena, Via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, Italy *Correspondence: [email protected] DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.031 SUMMARY which generates a different binding platform for the further recruitment of proteins that regulate gene expression. The phosphorylation of the serine 10 at histone H3 In Drosophila it has been shown that H3S10ph is required for has been shown to be important for transcriptional the recruitment of the positive transcription elongation factor activation. Here, we report the molecular mechanism b (P-TEFb) on the heat shock genes (Ivaldi et al., 2007) although through which H3S10ph triggers transcript elonga- these results have been challenged (Cai et al., 2008). tion of the FOSL1 gene. Serum stimulation induces In mammalian cells, nucleosome phosphorylation localized at the PIM1 kinase to phosphorylate the preacetylated promoters has been directly linked with transcriptional activa- tion. It has been shown that H3S10ph enhances the recruitment histone H3 at the FOSL1 enhancer. The adaptor of GCN5, which acetylates K14 on the same histone tail (Agalioti protein 14-3-3 binds the phosphorylated nucleo- et al., 2002; Cheung et al., 2000). Steroid hormone induces the some and recruits the histone acetyltransferase transcriptional activation of the MMLTV promoter by activating MOF, which triggers the acetylation of histone H4 MSK1 that phosphorylates H3S10, leading to HP1g displace- at lysine 16 (H4K16ac).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Transcriptomics Reveals Similarities and Differences
    Seifert et al. BMC Cancer (2015) 15:952 DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1939-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Comparative transcriptomics reveals similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades Michael Seifert1,2,5*, Martin Garbe1, Betty Friedrich1,3, Michel Mittelbronn4 and Barbara Klink5,6,7 Abstract Background: Astrocytomas are the most common primary brain tumors distinguished into four histological grades. Molecular analyses of individual astrocytoma grades have revealed detailed insights into genetic, transcriptomic and epigenetic alterations. This provides an excellent basis to identify similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades. Methods: We utilized public omics data of all four astrocytoma grades focusing on pilocytic astrocytomas (PA I), diffuse astrocytomas (AS II), anaplastic astrocytomas (AS III) and glioblastomas (GBM IV) to identify similarities and differences using well-established bioinformatics and systems biology approaches. We further validated the expression and localization of Ang2 involved in angiogenesis using immunohistochemistry. Results: Our analyses show similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades at the level of individual genes, signaling pathways and regulatory networks. We identified many differentially expressed genes that were either exclusively observed in a specific astrocytoma grade or commonly affected in specific subsets of astrocytoma grades in comparison to normal brain. Further, the number of differentially expressed genes generally increased with the astrocytoma grade with one major exception. The cytokine receptor pathway showed nearly the same number of differentially expressed genes in PA I and GBM IV and was further characterized by a significant overlap of commonly altered genes and an exclusive enrichment of overexpressed cancer genes in GBM IV. Additional analyses revealed a strong exclusive overexpression of CX3CL1 (fractalkine) and its receptor CX3CR1 in PA I possibly contributing to the absence of invasive growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Histone DNA Repair Code: H4k20me2 Makes Its Mark
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 1, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Regulation and Function of H4K20me2 in DNA Repair Understanding the histone DNA repair code: H4K20me2 makes its mark Karissa L. Paquina and Niall G. Howletta,1 aDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, U.S.A 1Corresponding author: Niall G. Howlett Ph.D., 379 Center for Biotechnology and Life Sciences, 120 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI, USA, Tel.: +1 401 874 4306; Fax: +1 401 874 2065; Email address: [email protected] Keywords: H4K20me2, DNA DSB repair, histone posttranslational modification, homologous recombination, nonhomologous DNA end joining The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest 1 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 1, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Regulation and Function of H4K20me2 in DNA Repair Abstract Chromatin is a highly compact structure that must be rapidly rearranged in order for DNA repair proteins to access sites of damage and facilitate timely and efficient repair. Chromatin plasticity is achieved through multiple processes, including the post- translational modification of histone tails. In recent years, the impact of histone post- translational modification on the DNA damage response has become increasingly well recognized, and chromatin plasticity has been firmly linked to efficient DNA repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Analysis of HPV Integration in Human Cancers Reveals Recurrent, Focal Genomic Instability
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Genome-wide analysis of HPV integration in human cancers reveals recurrent, focal genomic instability Keiko Akagi*a,b,c, Jingfeng Li*a,b,c, Tatevik R. Broutianb,d, Hesed Padilla-Nashf, Weihong Xiaob,d, Bo Jiangb,d, James W. Roccog,h, Theodoros N. Teknosi, Bhavna Kumari, Danny Wangsaf, Dandan Hea,b,c, Thomas Riedf, David E. Symer** ŧ a,b,c,d,e, Maura L. Gillison** ŧ b,d aHuman Cancer Genetics Program and bViral Oncology Program, Departments of cMolecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, dInternal Medicine and eBioinformatics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus OH; fCancer Genomics Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; gCenter for Cancer Research and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; hDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; iDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center *These authors contributed equally to this work **These authors contributed equally to this work ŧ Corresponding authors David E. Symer, M.D., Ph.D. [email protected] Maura L. Gillison M.D., Ph.D. [email protected] Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Akagi and Li et al SUMMARY Genomic instability is a hallmark of human cancers, including the 5% caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Here we report a striking association between HPV integration and adjacent host genomic structural variation in human cancer cell lines and primary tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Histone 4 Lysine 20 Methylation: a Case for Neurodevelopmental Disease
    biology Review Histone 4 Lysine 20 Methylation: A Case for Neurodevelopmental Disease Rochelle N. Wickramasekara and Holly A. F. Stessman * Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-280-2255 Received: 28 December 2018; Accepted: 26 February 2019; Published: 3 March 2019 Abstract: Neurogenesis is an elegantly coordinated developmental process that must maintain a careful balance of proliferation and differentiation programs to be compatible with life. Due to the fine-tuning required for these processes, epigenetic mechanisms (e.g., DNA methylation and histone modifications) are employed, in addition to changes in mRNA transcription, to regulate gene expression. The purpose of this review is to highlight what we currently know about histone 4 lysine 20 (H4K20) methylation and its role in the developing brain. Utilizing publicly-available RNA-Sequencing data and published literature, we highlight the versatility of H4K20 methyl modifications in mediating diverse cellular events from gene silencing/chromatin compaction to DNA double-stranded break repair. From large-scale human DNA sequencing studies, we further propose that the lysine methyltransferase gene, KMT5B (OMIM: 610881), may fit into a category of epigenetic modifier genes that are critical for typical neurodevelopment, such as EHMT1 and ARID1B, which are associated with Kleefstra syndrome (OMIM: 610253) and Coffin-Siris syndrome (OMIM: 135900), respectively. Based on our current knowledge of the H4K20 methyl modification, we discuss emerging themes and interesting questions on how this histone modification, and particularly KMT5B expression, might impact neurodevelopment along with current challenges and potential avenues for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • HIRA Orchestrates a Dynamic Chromatin Landscape in Senescence and Is Required for Suppression of Neoplasia
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press HIRA orchestrates a dynamic chromatin landscape in senescence and is required for suppression of neoplasia Taranjit Singh Rai,1,2,3 John J. Cole,1,2,5 David M. Nelson,1,2,5 Dina Dikovskaya,1,2 William J. Faller,1 Maria Grazia Vizioli,1,2 Rachael N. Hewitt,1,2 Orchi Anannya,1 Tony McBryan,1,2 Indrani Manoharan,1,2 John van Tuyn,1,2 Nicholas Morrice,1 Nikolay A. Pchelintsev,1,2 Andre Ivanov,1,2,4 Claire Brock,1,2 Mark E. Drotar,1,2 Colin Nixon,1 William Clark,1 Owen J. Sansom,1 Kurt I. Anderson,1 Ayala King,1 Karen Blyth,1 and Peter D. Adams1,2 1Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, United Kingdom; 2Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary, and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, United Kingdom; 3Institute of Biomedical and Environmental Health Research, University of West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom Cellular senescence is a stable proliferation arrest that suppresses tumorigenesis. Cellular senescence and associated tumor suppression depend on control of chromatin. Histone chaperone HIRA deposits variant histone H3.3 and histone H4 into chromatin in a DNA replication-independent manner. Appropriately for a DNA replication-independent chaperone, HIRA is involved in control of chromatin in nonproliferating senescent cells, although its role is poorly defined. Here, we show that nonproliferating senescent cells express and incorporate histone H3.3 and other canonical core histones into a dynamic chromatin landscape.
    [Show full text]