Revised Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Greece: Population Movement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revised Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Greece: Population Movement Revised Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Greece: Population Movement Emergency appeal MDRGR001, GLIDE n° OT-2015-000050-GRC Revision no 3 Date of issue: 22 March 2017 Date of emergency: ongoing since January 2015 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact (name and title): Tiina Saarikoski, Operations Manager Zefi Thanasoula, Head of Operations, Hellenic Red Cross Operation start date: 2 September 2015 Operation end date: 30 June 2018 Revised total budget: CHF 50,550, 46 Revised operational budget: CHF 46,925,475 Funding gap: CHF 15,560,410 Bilateral response: CHF 3,624,972 Number of people affected: Number of people to be assisted under this plan: 62,3851 34,673 people2 Host National Society: The Hellenic Red Cross currently plans to support the operation with some 1,204 volunteers and 109 HRC staff in areas hosting migrant communities Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: Austrian Red Cross, British Red Cross, Danish Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Spanish Red Cross, Luxembourg Red Cross. Other Movement contributors: American Red Cross, Belgian Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Croatian Red Cross, French Red Cross, Hungarian Red Cross, Icelandic Red Cross, Irish Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross Society, the Netherlands Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, Red Cross of Monaco, Swedish Red Cross, and Swiss Red Cross. Other donors to this appeal include the British, Icelandic, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norwegian and Swiss Governments as well as several private and corporate donors. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department (ECHO), Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Migration Policy, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defence and other Greek authorities, ICRC, IOM, UNHCR, UNICEF, WHO, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Médecins du Monde (MDM), International Rescue Committee (IRC),Samaritans Purse (SP), Save the Children, International Medical Corps, Mercy Corps, NRC, DRC, Oxfam, Catholic Relief Services (CRS), ASB, WAHA, Praksis, IsraAid as well as local associations and groups of volunteers. This revised plan of action continues to provide an emergency response in the Population Movement operation while at the same time moving towards sustaining long-term benefits through supporting integration of the migrant population into the Greek community and building on existing skills within the Hellenic Red Cross (HRC). From May 2017, interventions under this plan will be conducted through six building blocks: Accommodation/Reception Centres; Urban Approach; Building Bridges; Cash Transfer Programming; National Society Development; and other HRC programme areas - Disaster Management and Restoring Family Links. Each of these building blocks brings together different aspects addressing the needs of migrant and host communities in Greece. Further details on each of these building blocks can be found in the Detailed Operational Plan section of this document. The budget for this operation currently stands at CHF 50,550,446. This figure includes: 1) the budget from the beginning of the operation (May 2015) until December 2016 of CHF 18.4 million; 2) new budget of CHF 28.5 million developed for May 2017 onwards (refer to breakdown provided in Summary Budget Allocation); and 3) bilateral component of CHF3.6 million. The operational timeframe is anticipated to end by June 2018. 1 Source: UNHCR 2 The estimated number of people to be assisted is based on the number of target population (migrant and host population) under the different approaches in this revised plan. For the Reception Centre approach, the figures are based on Red Cross site mapping (as of January 2017) at the respective accommodation sites where Red Cross is and will continue to be active. It is impossible to provide accurate numbers due to the fluidity of migrant movements as well as the absence of a proper tracking system. P a g e | 2 A. Situation analysis Description of the situation Current situation As of 25 January 2017, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that more than 62,0003 migrants are currently stranded in Greece. Of these, more than 14,000 people are located on the Greek Islands, predominantly in reception and identification centres (RICs) and more than 47,000 on the mainland. Most of these people arrived after the EU- Turkey statement which came into effect on 20 March 2016, and are awaiting decisions on whether, according to the agreement, they will be repatriated. In the meantime, living conditions in some sites continue to be sub-standard and the need for humanitarian assistance is ongoing.4 The table below shows the number of arrivals to Greece by sea Reception and identification centre in Samos and Softex Kordelio sites pictured above. In January 2017, Northern in 2015 and 2016, as well as the latest daily averages. Greece has seen temperatures drop to -15 C with heavy snow. Migrants living in the country’s reception centres are especially vulnerable as it compounds already poor conditions. Photo: IFRC Arrivals to Greece by the Arrivals to Greece by the Average daily arrivals Average daily arrivals sea in 2015 sea in 2016 in Q4 2016 in January 2017 173,4505 856,700 806 36 Current arrival numbers are consistent with the number of people arriving pre-2015’s peak flows in Greece. The difference now though is that new arrivals are stranded in Greece and waiting on outcomes of applications for asylum and relocation. Others who are not granted asylum face return to Turkey or repatriation. The following table depicts the number of asylum applications, relocations and readmissions from Greece. Number of asylum applications in Number of migrants relocated to Number of migrants readmitted Greece as of 31 December 2016 other EU countries from Greece to Turkey 51,0917 7,286 more than 8008 As of December 2016, the breakdown of migrants arriving in Greece is as follows9: Countries Percentage (%) (1) Syrian Arab Republic 47 Top 3 countries of origin (2) Afghanistan 25 (3) Iraq 15 Women 21 Gender (age group) Men 42 Children (below 18 years) 37 Despite the reduction in arrivals in 2016, the closure of borders has forced migrants to seek alternative routes to entering into other parts of Europe. Challenges faced in doing so, including the lack of safe and legal transportation, the lack of 3 UNHCR. This a government figure and includes migrants on official and informal sites, other state run facilities, self-settled or by NGOs on islands and the mainland. However, it is recognised among humanitarian agencies that the number of migrants stranded in Greece is much lower. 4 UNHCR http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/country.php?id=83 5 UNHCR 6 UNHCR - 18 December 2016 7 http://asylo.gov.gr/en/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Greek-Asylum-Service-statistical-data_December2016_en.pdf 8 http://migration.iom.int/docs/2016_Flows_to_Europe_Overview.pdf 9 UNHCR 31 December 2016 P a g e | 3 essential items for survival, the evasion of border authorities, together with exposure to extreme weather and being victimized by criminal activity have increased the vulnerability of people migrating. Accommodation and Reception Centres in Greece Mainland The majority of migrants and refugees in Greece are located in over 40 accommodation centres10 in northern Greece and central parts of the mainland. Currently more than 32,000 people are living on official and informal sites, and other state or NGO run facilities in mainland Greece.11 This includes self-settled migrants and refugees but does not account for those undocumented. Originally set up in March 2016 to address the immediate needs of migrants stranded due to the closure of the western Balkans route, some of these sites continue to house migrants in sub-standard living conditions. Although development of the sites to accommodate migrants longer term has been slow for various reasons, continuous structural improvements and upgrades are taking place in many of the sites by the Greek government and different humanitarian agencies, including Red Cross, to improve the living conditions of the migrants. These upgrades are still ongoing and humanitarian assistance is still necessary as the Government of Greece has not been able to fully assume the responsibility of providing services to the migrants. Islands After the entry into force of the EU-Turkey statement, all migrants who arrived on the islands before 20 March 2016 were moved to the mainland. These asylum seekers are subject to the regular asylum process and may also apply for relocation to another EU country. A person is eligible for relocation only if he or she is in clear need of international protection and he or she is coming from a country eligible for relocation. Relocation candidates do not have their asylum claim examined in Greece but must go through the identification, registration and fingerprinting procedure carried out by the Greek authorities with the support of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex). The EU-Turkey statement provides for the return of all new irregular migrants and asylum seekers, whose applications have been declared inadmissible or unfounded, crossing from Turkey to the Greek islands after 20 March 2016. This means that for those migrants who entered Greece after 20 March, the Greek authorities will first examine the possibility of a return to Turkey. Until now family cases and vulnerable persons have been exempted from this admissibility assessment. If Greek
Recommended publications
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Institute for Strategic International Studies ISIS - 2011 REPORT Emergency Readiness is Leadership Driven Institute for Strategic International Studies - ISIS 2011 Contents Membership … 3 Executive Summary … 4 Domestic Research Plan … 6 Global Research Plan … 7 International Field Studies - Interviews … 10 ISIS 2011 – Consolidation Of Research – What Canada Needs to Know … 11 ISIS 2011 - Themes … 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners
    Ref. Ares(2018)5063294 - 03/10/2018 Mediterranean practitioners’ network & capacity building for effective response to emerging security challenges MEDEA is a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme H2020-SEC-21-GM-2016-2017, under grant agreement no 787111. Additional information about the project and the consortium can be found at www.medea-project.eu D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners Contractual Delivery Date: 08/2018 Actual Delivery Date: 03/10/2018 Dissemination level: Public Version: 1.0 Abstract This deliverable lists the major International, Regional and National organizations, around the Management of Migration Flows and Asylum seekers, Border Management and Surveillance, Cross Border Crime and Terrorism and Natural Hazards and Natechs, containing profiling and contact information, as well as their particular area of expertise. The main scope and objectives of the Registry are defined in the current document. DISCLAIMER: This document contains material, which is the copyright of the MEDEA consortium members and the European Commission, and may not be reproduced or copied without permission, except as mandated by the European Commission grant agreement no. 787111 for reviewing and dissemination purposes. Copyright by the MEDEA consortium, 2018-2023. D1.4 Registry of Mediterranean Practitioners Document Control - Revision History Issue Date Comment Author / Institution 0.1 30/08/2018 Finalise Practitioners template EUC, DGAP Desktop research in 4 TCPs. Create excel 30/08/2018 KEMEA 0.2 registry 0.3 06/09/2018 Transfer Excel entries to Deliverable KEMEA 0.4 17/09/2018 Add inputs from partners KEMEA, EUC The information contained in this document is provided by the copyright holders "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Issn 2654-1823
    SAFEGREECE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ISSN 2654-1823 14-17.10 proceedings SafeGreece 2020 – 7th International Conference on Civil Protection & New Technologies 14‐16 October, on‐line | www.safegreece.gr/safegreece2020 | [email protected] Publisher: SafeGreece [www.safegreece.org] Editing, paging: Katerina – Navsika Katsetsiadou Title: SafeGreece 2020 on‐line Proceedings Copyright © 2020 SafeGreece SafeGreece Proceedings ISSN 2654‐1823 SafeGreece 2020 on-line Proceedings | ISSN 2654-1823 index About 1 Committees 2 Topics 5 Thanks to 6 Agenda 7 Extended Abstracts (Oral Presentations) 21 New Challenges for Multi – Hazard Emergency Management in the COVID-19 Era in Greece Evi Georgiadou, Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE) 23 An Innovative Emergency Medical Regulation Model in Natural and Manmade Disasters Chih-Long Pan, National Yunlin University of Science and technology, Taiwan 27 Fragility Analysis of Bridges in a Multiple Hazard Environment Sotiria Stefanidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 31 Nature-Based Solutions: an Innovative (Though Not New) Approach to Deal with Immense Societal Challenges Thanos Giannakakis, WWF Hellas 35 Coastal Inundation due to Storm Surges on a Mediterranean Deltaic Area under the Effects of Climate Change Yannis Krestenitis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 39 Optimization Model of the Mountainous Forest Areas Opening up in Order to Prevent and Suppress Potential Forest Fires Georgios Tasionas, Democritus University of Thrace 43 We and the lightning Konstantinos Kokolakis,
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • MYTILINEOS S.A. — Sustainable Development Report 2019
    Sustainable Development Report 2019 Contents Social 6 ESG Performance Statement 8 Parameters of the Sustainable Development Report 95 Occupational Health & Safety 11 Message from the Chairman 95 Disclosure Management approach 15 Profile & Business Activity Sectors 99 Results 20 Countries of Activity 105 Employment 22 Strategic priorities 105 Disclosure Management approach 26 How we create value 108 Results 30 Our approach to Sustainable Development 111 Overview of performance in 2019 38 Materiality process 112 Human Rights 43 Stakeholder Engagement 112 Disclosure Management approach 114 Results 52 Financial performance in 2019 & outlook for 2020 118 Sustainability of local communities 118 Disclosure Management approach Environment 120 Results 126 Emergency Response Plans 59 Environmental policy 126 Disclosure Management approach 62 Environmental Restoration & Biodiversity 127 Results 62 Disclosure Management approach 128 Customer Health & Safety 64 Results 128 Disclosure Management approach 66 Energy & Air emissions 129 Results 66 Disclosure Management approach 130 Other significant Social issues 68 Results 130 Employee Training & Evaluation 70 Adaptation to climate change 131 Diversity & Equal opportunities 70 Disclosure Management approach 132 Supply chain management 71 Results 133 Protection of customers' personal data 74 Pollution prevention 134 Responsible communication and product labelling 74 Disclosure Management approach 136 ESG KPI's 76 Results 78 Water management Governance 78 Disclosure Management approach 80 Results 141 Anti-Corruption
    [Show full text]
  • The ANSFR Project
    The ANSFR Project Workshop 2 - Frederikssund- Halsnæs 28th September – 1st October 2009 “European Exchange of Good Practice in Identification, Assessment and Management of Environmental Fire Risk” Report compiled by Frederikssund-Halsnæs Fire and Rescue Department and Northumberland Fire and Rescue Service 24th February 2010 This report documents the sessions and findings of the Frederikssund-Halsnæs Workshop, the second of four workshops to be delivered during the ANSFR Project. The workshop and the ANSFR Project are co-funded by the European Commission Directorate-General for Environment under the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, 2008 Call for Proposals (grant agreement number: 070401/2008/507848/SUB/A3). The European Commission is not responsible for any information contained within this document or for any use made of the information contained therein. © This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or internal circulation within organisations. This is subject to information contained within the handbook being reproduced accurately and not being used in a misleading context. Northumberland Fire and Rescue Service, Frederikssund-Halsnæs Fire and Rescue Department, Corpo Nazionale dei Vigili del Fuoco – Nucleo Investigativo Antincendi, and the Emergency Services College Finland must be acknowledged as the owners of the material contained within this handbook and the title of the publication must be specified. Report compiled by: Dr. Robert Stacey ANSFR Project
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake: Preparedness and Emergency Response for Effec Ve
    National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Post Graduate Program Earthquake Planning Center of Excellence Environmental, Disaster & Crises & Protection Organization for Natural Disasters’ Management Management Strategies SCIENTIFIC REPORT The October 30, 2020, Mw=6.9, Samos (Eastern Aegean Sea, Greece) Earthquake: Preparedness and Emergency Response for Effecve Disaster Management Efthymios Lekkas, Spyridon Mavroulis, Asimina Kourou, Maria Manousaki, Thekla Thoma , Nikolaos Karveleas December 2020 ISSN 2653-9454 Athens – Samos About Special issue of the non-periodic publication of the Post-graduate Studies Program “Environmental Disasters & Crises Management Strategies" of the National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, issued after significant events for the immediate information of the scientific community and the general public. The publication includes also scientific data from various research teams from universities, organizations and research institutes. Publishers Dr. Efthymis Lekkas Dr. Nikolaos Voulgaris Dr. Stylianos Lozios Technical Editing Dr. Spyridon Mavroulis Communication Dr. Spyridon Mavroulis ([email protected]) PhD C. Alexia Grambas ([email protected]) PhD C. Katerina-Nafsika Katsetsiadou ([email protected]) Copyrights All copyrights of scientific data belong to their respective owners, while the copyrights of this publication belong to the publishers. This study was funded by the Environmental, Disaster and Crises Management Strategies Post graduate Program of the Department of Geology and Geoenvironment
    [Show full text]
  • REFUGEE WOMEN GUIDE This Booklet Was Created As Part of the Erasmus+ Project
    REFUGEE WOMEN GUIDE This booklet was created as part of the Erasmus+ project: “INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FOR REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION OF REFUGEE WOMEN IN TURKEY AND EUROPE” Ref No: 2016-1-TR01-KA204-033919 GREEK EDITION 2 CONTENTS 1. Definitions 4 2. Migration Services 5 3. Health Services 12 4. Education Services 19 5. Employment Services 21 6. Wedding Procedures 25 7. Psychological Services 27 8. Urgent Phone Numbers 32 Ambulance 33 Police 34 Fire 35 3 1. DEFINITIONS 1.2 What is a Refugee? A refugee, is someone who is forced to leave his country because of political, ethnic, racial and religious persecution, or because he belongs to a particular social group that is being prosecuted. A refugee is also, someone who is at risk in his country because of war or violence. As a result, he cannot return to his home country and is entitled to asylum and international protection in the country where resorts to. 1.2 What is migrant? A migrant, is someone who leaves his country trying to find work and better living conditions. Usually, a migrant is forced to leave because of environmental conditions and absolutely poverty. The difference with a refugee is that a migrant can return to his country. It is important to note that, usually, both migrants and refugees, when they enter Greece, do not have documents and it is not easy to identify their identity. 1.3 What is asylum seeker? An asylum seeker, is a person who has left his home country as a political refugee and is seeking asylum in another.
    [Show full text]
  • Com 328 1 Annexe En.Pdf
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.6.2021 COM(2021) 328 final ANNEX ANNEX to the Proposal for a Council Implementing Decision on the approval of the assessment of the recovery and resilience plan for Greece {SWD(2021) 155 final} EN EN ANNEX SECTION 1: REFORMS AND INVESTMENTS UNDER THE RECOVERY AND RESILIENCE PLAN 1. Description of Reforms and Investments A. COMPONENT 1.1: POWER UP This component of the Greek recovery and resilience plan targets reforms and investments to increase the weight of renewable energy sources in the electricity system and facilitate Greece’s process of decarbonisation. Reforms shall simplify licensing rules for renewable energy investment, make the electricity market more efficient, and secure the financial sustainability of support schemes. The component also includes key investments in networks to complete the interconnection with the Cyclades islands and make electricity distribution more environment-friendly and able to absorb a greater share of renewable energy. Storage systems shall also support the decarbonisation of the economy through accumulating surplus renewable electricity. Land rehabilitation shall also be supported in areas currently used as lignite mines, as a step of the just transition process in the territories most affected by the phase-out of lignite. The component is in line with the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) and supports addressing the country-specific recommendations on public and private investment (Country Specific Recommendation 3 of 2020 and Country Specific Recommendation 2 of 2019). It is expected that no measure in this component does significant harm to environmental objectives within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, taking into account the description of the measures and the mitigating steps set out in the recovery and resilience plan in accordance with the Do No Significant Harm Technical Guidance (2021/C58/01).
    [Show full text]
  • EVA - European Virtual Academy
    EVA - European Virtual Academy FINAL TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AGREEMENT NUMBER 07- 03 06 01/2005/423869/SUB/A5 20/01/2008 Project Leader: - CEFRIEL Version: 1.0 Project Partner: - Italian Department of Civil Protection Status: Final Technical Manager: Lucia De Francesco Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction to EVA - European Virtual Academy Project .......................... 7 1.1 Projec t overview ...................................................................................... 7 1.2 Contents: Thematic Areas ...................................................................... 8 1.3 Servic es and Tools: EVA Portal ................................................................ 9 1.4 Partners and partic ipants ...................................................................... 10 1.4.1 CEFRIEL .............................................................................................................. 10 1.4.2 Italian Department of Civil Protection ............................................................. 10 1.5 EVA Core Group .................................................................................... 11 1.6 Agreement with THW and SGSP ........................................................... 11 2 Thematic Areas .............................................................................................. 12 2.1 Community Mechanism Training Programe ....................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Limitations in Cross-Cultural
    Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi / 2012 Cilt: VII Sayı: II STRATECIC MANAGEMENT OF SECURITY FORCES DURING THE OG OG 2004 (ATHENS). CRISIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE ROLE OF THE HELLENIC COAST GUARD Tryfon Korontzis1 Abstract: The aim of this concise paper is to present and to examine critically the security policy planning of the Olympic Games 2004 (OG 2004) which took place in Hellas. More specifically will be examined the strategic management of security forces which were involved in them, the crisis management system which was developed in order to combat any event, incident during the Olympic Games and further to ensure the secure conduct of them. Furthermore will be analyzed the role and the contribution of one of the basic Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) in Hellas, the role of the Hellenic Coast Guard in this security policy. It is noted that Hellas was the smallest country that has ever organized modern Olympic Games. Because of its size, the international interest and the participation of many people of the entire world activated the whole state machine and the total of forces in order to be ensured the secure conduct of them. Key words: Olympic Games, Hellas, strategic management, crisis management system, security forces, Hellenic Coast Guard (HCG) Introduction The Olympic Games is a world event, attracting world attention. One of the most important parameters taken into consideration during the organisation of the Olympic Games is Security. This parameter was also of particular consideration to the Hellenic state, as soon as Athens was designated as the Olympic Games host city of the 28th Olympiad.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenic Defence Industries Catalogue Catalogue Tries
    HELLENIC MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENCE 2021 HELLENICHELLL ENIC DEFENCEDEFENCE INDUSTRIESINDUSTTRIES CATALOGUEC GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR DEFENCE INVESTMENTS & ARMAMENTS CREATION - PRINTING: HELLENIC ARMY'S PRINTING OFFICE All rights reserved. No part of this publication, or related recorded material, may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical or print, including photocopies, or any other means, without prior HELLENIC written consent of the Hellenic MoD. While every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, it should be noted that the information was mainly based on data submitted by the companies under their responsibility. DEFENCE Publication date: 2021 Previous editions: 2000, 2002, 2006, 2008, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020. Published under the Authority of: The Hellenic Ministry of National Defence (HMoD), INDUSTRIES General Directorate for Defence Investments and Armaments (GDDIA) with cooperation of the Hellenic Aerospace & Defence Industries Group (HASDIG) and the Association of Hellenic Manufacturers of Defence Material Association (SEKPY). GDDIA Contact Details: CATALOGUE Tel.: +30 210 7466445 Fax: +30 210 7466544 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.gdaee.mil.gr Address: Fakinos Camp, 5-7 Panagioti Kanellopoulou Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece 2021 Introduction 3 Editorial 5 HASDIG Presentation 7 SEKPY Presentation 9 Sector of Activity, Capability, Level 10-11 Index of Companies by Sector of Activity 12-19 Hellenic Defence Industries 22-181 Index
    [Show full text]