Differential Diagnosis and Hospital Course History Physical Exam And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Differential Diagnosis and Hospital Course History Physical Exam And Sudden Onset Altered Mental Status Anees Daud, MD Intermountain Medical Center History Differential Diagnosis and Hospital Discussion A 71-yr-old woman with a past significant history of relapsing- Course Serotonin syndrome is characterized by a clinical triad of mental remitting multiple sclerosis, anxiety, and depression, presented to status changes, autonomic hyperactivity, and neuromuscular the emergency department with a one day history of altered mental abnormality. There is a significant amount of variability in the Initial diagnostic work up was targeted towards her history of status. The patient’s husband and granddaughter provided the presenting symptoms. These can range from mild symptoms, multiple sclerosis and presence of a possible occult infection. history. The patient was reportedly in her usual state of health until which include akathisia and tremors, to severe symptoms, which She was started on broad spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin and 9AM on the day of presentation, when she began to act “strangely” include clonus, muscular hypertonicity, and hyperthermia (>40C) zosyn) since infection was highest on the differential. The and “confused.” The patient was altered in the ED as well, at one (Figure 2). The pathophysiology of serotonin syndrome is based negative MRI and absent inflammatory cells in the CSF made point taking off her clothes and walking around the ED. on the hyper-activation of serotonergic neurons. In the central active multiple sclerosis very unlikely. Infectious nervous system, they belong in the midline raphe nuclei which meningitis/encephalitis was also unlikely based on those results. Of note, the patient had recently been under significant stress are located in the brainstem from the midbrain to the medulla. In Blood/urine culture/CSF cultures were negative for bacteria, because one of her daughters was going through a divorce and had the CNS, serotonergic neurons are responsible for wakefulness, fungi, HSV, and VZV. moved in with her parents. Her medications included norco, affective behavior, thermoregulation, and motor tone. In the PNS, duloxetine, bupropion, donepezil, pregabalin, levothyroxine, these neurons are responsible for regulation of vascular tone and Since there was no improvement within the first 12-24hrs, other omeprazole, fosamax, docusate, and occasional zolpidem. gastrointestinal motility. This helps to explain the clinical findings diagnoses were explored. Further history from the husband in patients suffering from this syndrome. revealed that with the recent onset of home stressors, the patient had perhaps been taking higher doses of some of her The diagnosis of Serotonin medications. Syndrome is based entirely Physical Exam and Diagnostic Studies on clinical criteria (Figure After reevaluation of her history and clinical presentation, 3). My patient met the The patient’ s vital signs were T 36.2C, BP 187/80, HR 116, RR 22, specifically her tremors, hyperreflexia, inducible clonus, agitation, criteria based on the and SaO2 90% on room air. On exam, she was agitated, impulsive, and diaphoresis, a diagnosis of Serotonin Syndrome was made. presence of tremor and attempting to climb out of bed, and unable to carry on a Since the patient’s home serotonergic medications were already hyperreflexia, and the conversation. She was diffusely tremulous, especially in the upper held on admission, she required only supportive management for presence of inducible extremities. She was diaphoretic, and skin was warm to the touch. her autonomic instability and agitation. This was managed clonus, agitation, and Cranial nerves were difficult to test, but she had appropriate lateral primarily with hydralazine, lorazepam, and haloperidol, diaphoresis. The EOMs, and no facial asymmetry. She had hyperreflexia in the biceps, respectively. The patient’s mental status returned to baseline management consists of triceps, and patellar tendons. Two to three beats of ankle clonus within the next three days, and she was discharged with removal of the offending improved clinical status and with home health physical therapy to agents, and supportive were present. She was tachycardic with a regular rhythm. Chest was Figure 3. clear to auscultation. Abdomen was soft, but tender diffusely, and recover from deconditioning. care. bowel sounds were active. The agitation can be controlled with benzodiazepines, which Initial labs showed WBC 8.5K/uL (47.4% PMNs, 41.7% lymphs, 6% blunts the hyperadrenergic state (mortality benefits have been monos, 3.4% eos, 1.1% baso), Hg 14.4 g/dL, and Plt 302K/uL. The shown in animals). For severe cases (extreme hyperthermia, CMP was unremarkable, as were the TSH, lipase, hepatitis panel, muscular hypertonicity), management may include sedation, and ESR/CRP. The urinalysis did not show evidence of a UTI, and neuromuscular paralysis, and intubation to prevent urine toxicology screen showed synthetic opioids. Lactic acid was rhabdomyolysis. elevated at 3.7. Blood and urine cultures were obtained in the ED. EKG showed sinus tachycardia with a significant amount of Figure 1. movement artifact (Figure 1). References A chest x-ray and CT abdomen/pelvis were unremarkable. The ED 1.Boyer, EW, Shannon, M. The Serotonin Syndrome. N Engl J Med. consulted Neurology, who recommended an MRI brain/spine. This 2005;352:1112-20. did not show any acute processes or new multiple sclerosis lesions. 2.Mason PJ, Morris VA, Balcezak TJ. Serotonin syndrome. Lumbar puncture had normal protein and glucose, and was negative Presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature. Medicine for WBCs and bacteria/fungi on gram stain. (Baltimore) 2000; 79:201. Figure 2. Images courtesy of Intermountain Medical Center Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report Ashley R. Donaldson, MD Intermountain Medical Center History Differential Diagnosis/Hospital Course Discussion A 78 year old female with a history of diabetes mellitus, chronic The differential diagnosis for this patient’s presentation of epigastric Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a relatively rare event, although its kidney disease and chronic urinary tract infections presented to the pain wth dyspnea included acute coronary syndrome, pnemonia, incidence has increased in recent years. It is commonly triggered by Emergency Department via EMS following two episodes of takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. one of three inciting factors including iatrogenic causes, neurologic hypoglycemia. On the night prior to admission, the patient’s son had Given the concern for a cardiac event she was started on ACS events, and emotional or physical stressors. Iatrogenic causes are difficulty awakening her. He checked her blood glucose, which was protocol. numerous, including sympathomimetic, alpha adrenergic, 40. An amp of dextrose administered by EMS improved her glucose anticholinergic, and para-sympatholytic medications. Similarly, to 113 and she remained at home the rest of the evening. Over the course of admission her neurologic events that cause catecholamine release and sympathetic (3) At 5:00 the morning of admission the patient was again difficult to troponin and activation have been associated with takotsubo. All of these factors arouse. In the ED her blood glucose was 26. She was given another CK-MB levels can cause an increase in catecholamine levels. The apex of the amp of dextrose; her blood glucose increased to 120. Three hours continued to rise, myocardium has a greater vulnerability to sudden surges in later she was again hypoglycemic with a blood glucose of 21. peaking at 2.11 catecholamine levels and thus results in the hypokinesis noted on (3) Following dextrose she was started on a D5W infusion. and 5.2, perfusion scans of takotsubo patients. Emotional/physical stressors are common in the general population, but few patients develop The patient reported starting glimepiride 3 months prior. She denied respectively, 24 takotsubo, thus indicating predisposing factors also play a role. any history of hypoglycemic events but did endorse experiencing a hours after initial “panic attack” one month earlier while getting a CT scan. She stated onset. Chest x- Risk factors for takotsubo cardiomyopathy are categorized into this episode felt similar to a hypoglycemic event, with racing of her Figure 1. ECG with left bundle branch block. ray showed no cardiovascular (HTN, smoking, HLD, CAD), associated co- heart, dizziness and lightheadedness. significant morbidities (endocrinopathies, malignancy), and endothelial cardiopulmonary dysfunction, (atherosclerosis, systemic inflammatory disorders, The morning after admission the patient complained of epigastric abnormality (Figure 2). Transthoracic echocardiography results estrogen deficiency).(2) The diagnosis is most common in post- pain and shortness of breath. Her pain was similar to that of showed an ejection fraction of 33%, segmental wall motion menopausal females, likely because of the decreased estrogen state, as heartburn. She stated both of these symptoms were new but felt abnormalities, a severely hypokinetic/akinetic right ventricular apex, estrogen protects against myocardial damage during similar to her prior panic attack. She also reported heart palpitations, and tricuspid regurgitation. Myocardial PET perfusion scan was ischemia/reperfusion through induction of endothelial nitric oxide fevers, and chills, but denied substernal chest pain, pain radiating to Conclusions subsequently performed, demonstrating a small, fixed apical defect synthase. her back, nausea or vomiting.
Recommended publications
  • Musculoskeletal Diagnosis Utilizing History and Physical Examination: Focus on Spine
    NYU Long Island School of Medicine MUSCULOSKELETAL DIAGNOSIS UTILIZING HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: FOCUS ON SPINE Ralph K. Della Ratta, MD, FACP Kevin J. Curley, MD, FACP Division of General Internal Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital NYU Long Island School of Medicine, SUNY Stony Brook School of Medicine Board Certified in IM and Primary Care Sports Medicine Learning Objectives 1. Identify components of the focused history and physical examination that will guide musculoskeletal diagnosis 2. Utilize musculoskeletal examination provocative maneuvers to aide differential diagnosis 3. Review the evidence base (likelihood ratios etc.) that is known about musculoskeletal physical examination 2 NYU Long Island School of Medicine * ¾ of medical diagnoses are still made on history and exam despite technological Musculoskeletal Physical Exam advances of modern medicine • Physical examination is key to musculoskeletal diagnosis • Unlike many other organ systems, the diagnostic standard for many musculoskeletal disorders is the exam finding (e.g. diagnosis of epicondylitis, see below) • “You may think you have not seen it, but it has seen you!” Lateral Epicondylitis confirmed on exam by reproducing pain at lateral epicondyle with resisted dorsiflexion at wrist **not diagnosed with imaging** 3 NYU Long Island School of Medicine Musculoskeletal Physical Exam 1. Inspection – symmetry, swelling, redness, deformity 2. Palpation – warmth, tenderness, crepitus, swelling 3. Range of motion *most sensitive for joint disease Bates Pocket Guide to Physical
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Quick Reference Guide
    EPA Quick Reference Guide EPAs 1 & 2 – Professionalism Unacceptable • Unreliable • Dishonest • Avoids responsibility • Commitment uncertain • Dresses inappropriately • Unexplained absences • Verbal and non-verbal disrespect towards preceptor • Does not recognize own limitations and the need to seek assistance • Unable to comprehend the point of view and emotional state of other people • Judgmental of others • Fails to recognize and respect cross-cultural and gender differences Minimally Competent • Sometimes late • Not consistently able to complete assignments or tasks • Not consistently considerate of the feelings and emotional needs of others • Sometimes judgmental Competent • Punctual • Dependable • Accepts responsibilities • Demonstrates a willingness to accept feedback regarding necessary change(s) • Appropriately shows concern for others’ feelings and interacts accordingly • Recognizes and respects cross-cultural and gender differences Office of Medical Education 306 Liberty View Lane, Lynchburg, Va. 24502 [email protected] EPAs 3 & 4 – Data Gathering / Interviewing & Physical Examination Skills Unacceptable • Inefficient, disorganized • Weak prioritization skills • Misses major findings • Fails to appreciate physical findings and pertinent information • History and/or physical exam incomplete or inaccurate • Insufficient attention to psychosocial issues • Needs to work on establishing rapport with patients • Needs to work on awareness of appropriate boundaries with patients • Needs to improve demonstration of compassion •
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Reasoning - the Process of Thinking and Decision Making, Consciously & Unconsciously  Guide Practice Actions
    Diagnostic Reasoning “DR” Toolbox for Hospitalist Faculty Heather Hofmann, MD Department of Medicine 2017-18 2 Goal Increase faculty familiarity with diagnostic reasoning principles and tools so as to improve its teaching. Three Parts: I: Introduction to Diagnostic Reasoning II: DR Toolbox III: Structured Reflection Exercise (SRE) 4 Part I: Introduction to Diagnostic Reasoning Learning Objectives - Understand the “what” and “why” of Diagnostic Reasoning - Recognize dual-process theory’s role in “how” we reason 6 What is Diagnostic Reasoning? - Clinical reasoning - The process of thinking and decision making, consciously & unconsciously guide practice actions 25yo female G1P0, 2m gestation returns from Rio. - Diagnostic reasoning: - The process of collecting & analyzing information establish a diagnosis chest pain STEMI in proximal LAD abdominal pain acute appendicitis 7 Why teach diagnostic reasoning? - Incorrect diagnoses are often at the root of medical errors - DR is a means to apply basic science to clinical problems - Central to being a physician 8 Patient’s perspective What’s wrong with me? Is it bad? What can we do about it? 9 Why now? Never too early for practice 10 From Novice to Expert 11 How do we reason? Information processing theory 12 How do we reason? Information processing theory: Dual process theory. Analytical Non-analytical Conscious Unconscious Type/System 2 Type/System 1 Slow Fast Effortful Automatic Deliberative Involuntary Logical Emotional Requires attention, Executes skilled self-control, time. response and
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Management of Chlamydia: a Guide for Gps
    ■ PRESCRIBING IN PRACTICE Diagnosis and management of chlamydia: a guide for GPs ELEANOR DRAEGER SPL Chlamydia is a common sexually- transmitted infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis bacteria. This article discusses its diagnosis and treatment, and considers the GP’s role in management. hlamydia is the most common sexually-transmitted infection C(STI) in the UK, with 203,116 new diagnoses in England in 2017, of which 126,828 (62%) were in young people aged 15–24 years.1 Chlamydia is transmitted primarily through penetrative sex and infects the urethra and endocervix. It can also infect the throat and the rectum, and in some cases the conjunctiva. It is very infectious, with a concordance of up to 75% between sexual partners. There are many risk factors for chlamydia infection, including being under the age of 25 years, having a new sexual partner and inconsistent use of condoms. If a woman contracts chlamydia during pregnancy it can be transmitted to the baby at delivery, causing conjunctivitis or pneumonia. Classification of chlamydia infections There are three species of chlamydia bacteria that can cause disease in humans: • Chlamydia psittaci – the natural host is birds, especially par- rots, but it can be transmitted to humans, causing psittacosis • Chlamydia pneumoniae – causes respiratory disease in humans • Chlamydia trachomatis – several different serovars can cause disease (including STIs) in humans, as detailed in Figure 1. Symptoms The majority of genital chlamydia infections are asymptomatic, but they can cause significant symptoms. In women, chlamydia can cause vaginal discharge, dysuria, abdominal and pelvic pain, post-coital and intermenstrual bleeding, and deep dys- pareunia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the Medical History for the Diagnosis of Simulated Cases by Medical Students
    International Journal of Medical Education. 2012;3:78-82 ISSN: 2042-6372 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4f8a.e48c The contribution of the medical history for the diagnosis of simulated cases by medical students Tomoko Tsukamoto, Yoshiyuki Ohira, Kazutaka Noda, Toshihiko Takada, Masatomi Ikusaka Department of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan Correspondence: Tomoko Tsukamoto, Department of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba city, Chiba, 260-8677 Japan. Email: [email protected] Accepted: April 15, 2012 Abstract Objectives: The case history is an important part of diag- rates were compared using analysis of the χ2-test. nostic reasoning. The patient management problem method Results: Sixty students (63.8%) made a correct diagnosis, has been used in various studies, but may not reflect the which was based on the history in 43 students (71.7%), actual reasoning process because a list of choices is given to physical findings in 11 students (18.3%), and laboratory the subjects in advance. This study investigated the contri- data in 6 students (10.0%). Compared with students who bution of the history to making the correct diagnosis by considered the correct diagnosis in their differential diagno- using clinical case simulation, in which students obtained sis after taking a history, students who failed to do so were clinical information by themselves. 5.0 times (95%CI = 2.5-9.8) more likely to make a final Methods: A prospective study was conducted. Ninety-four misdiagnosis (χ2(1) = 30.73; p<0.001). fifth-year medical students from Chiba University who Conclusions: History taking is especially important for underwent supervised clinical clerkships in 2009 were making a correct diagnosis when students perform clinical surveyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease | Piedmont Healthcare
    Peripheral Arterial Disease CLAUDICATION TO LIMB THREATENING ISCHEMIA THE HOW AND WHEN TO EVALUATE AND TREAT Brian M Freeman MD FACS Nothing to Disclose PAD: Peripheral Arterial Disease Obstruction of any “peripheral artery” Causes – Atherosclerosis – Emboli – Extrinsic compression – Vasculitis PAD Effects more than 15 million Americans Majority of patients are asymptomatic African Americans and Hispanics are at risk Diabetics with PAD are at significant risk for amputations (Neuropathy + PAD) PAD Risk Factors PAD: PREVALENCE vs AGE PAD: More Prevalent and More Deadly Than Many Leading Diseases Disease Prevalence (Millions) Five-Year Mortality Rate 5 50% 17.0 4 40% 39% 30% 3 30% 28% 12.6 12.0 8.9 21% 2 4.8 20% 5.0 14% 4.0 1 10% 0 0% Diabetes Coronary PAD Cancer CHF Stroke Alzheimers Colorectal PAD Stroke CAD Breast Heart Cancer Cancer Disease Source: American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, Alzheimers Disease Education/Referral Center, American Diabetes Association, SAGE Group PAD: LONG-TERM MORTALITY Atherosclerosis is a Systemic Disease Lesion Location Consequence Carotid, cerebral Stroke Aorta, arch Aneurysm Coronary artery MI Renal artery HTN, CRF Mesenteric Bowel infarct Iliac artery Impotence Femoral artery Claudication Tibial artery Limb loss PAD There is a 5 fold increase in the relative risk of a Cardiovascular ischemic event Total Mortality is increased 2-3 X Visual Cues to PAD and Arterial Insufficiency Cool, dry, atrophic skin on legs Thickened or deformed nails-dystrophic Hair loss or uneven distribution on legs
    [Show full text]
  • The Oral Presentation Nersi Nikakhtar, M.D
    Guidelines for the Oral Presentation Nersi Nikakhtar, M.D. University of Minnesota Medical School !1 Table of Contents The Oral Presentation: An Introduction ..................................3 Why Worry About the Oral Presentation? ...............................4 Presenting the New Patient .....................................................5 The Opening Statement ......................................................5 History of Present Illness ....................................................5 Past Medical History ...........................................................6 Medications/Allergies ..........................................................7 Social and Family History ...................................................7 Review of Systems ..............................................................7 Vitals .....................................................................................8 Physical Exam .....................................................................8 Labs and Studies .................................................................8 Summary Statement ............................................................8 Assessment and Plan ..........................................................9 The Follow Up (or Daily) Presentation: What's Different? ...................................................................11 The Outpatient (Known Patient) Presentation: What's Different? ...................................................................12 !2 The Oral Presentation: An Introduction The
    [Show full text]
  • Neurology History and Physical Guidelines
    Neurology History and Physical Guidelines HISTORY Chief Complaint — A maximally succinct statement of the patient: - Age, handedness, gender - Problem and its duration - May include major relevant risk factors (if any), e.g. hypertension, coronary artery disease in a stroke patient. - Rarely need to mention imaging if that was reason for the consult (not in every case) - May specify who the historian was and quality of informant’s history if different from usual - E.g: 56 year old right-handed woman that presents with three days of garbled speech and right sided weakness with a history significant for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes mellitus History of Present Illness — - Briefly include usual state of health (baseline): e.g: “normal, active, fully functional”; “residual mild right hemiparesis and can ambulate 50 feet with walker”; “at baseline, oriented to self, transfers by lift, and cannot recognize family members”, etc. - Concisely and chronologically describe symptoms which prompted medical attentions (Timeline) - For each try to include as many details: location, quality/severity, chronology (when it first began, mode of onset, mode of ending, duration, frequency), setting, aggravating and alleviating factors, treatment, associated symptoms, overall course, effect on normal activities, previous history of similar symptoms - Include pertinent negative symptoms that relate to differential diagnosis and localization - Pertinent past medical history and family history - Put present symptoms in context of pre-existing chronic illness. If the chronic illness is neurological, how it was diagnosed/confirmed - Hospital course: most relevant information (vital signs, early exam, treatments, response to therapy, symptom evolution) - Only include information that contributes in an important way to diagnosis or management.
    [Show full text]
  • OPQRST-AAA One Tool That Some Clinicians Find Helpful Is Using the Mnemonic OPQRST-AAA to Elicit the Details of a Pain Complaint
    #1 Take a history related to diarrhea Diarrhea is subjective and can be defined as an increase in the volume, frequency or fluidity of stool relative to normal conditions. First introduce yourself to the patient and start: Personal and Social History: name, age, gender, occupation – Use as your own (Single, living with parents. No tobacco use). Present complaint: “ What brought you here”? 1-When these complaints started? It started early in the morning. 2-How many times do you go to the toilet today? 6 times. 3-How many times did you use to go to the toilet before this problem? Once daily. 4-Can you describe your stool: a. Is it watery, or bulky? Yes, watery. b.What color? Light yellow. c. Is there any blood or mucous in stool? No. d.Does it have foul smell? A little bit. 5-Do you have any additional symptoms - any nausea or vomiting? I vomited twice. 6-Do you have fever? No 7- Is there any pain on passing stools? No, but I have abdominal discomfort. 8-Can you describe what do you mean by abdominal discomfort? Is it located in certain part of the abdomen? When it comes I urgently go to the toilet. It is all around, I can’t specify any location. 9-Recent dietary history, consumption of meats (cooked, uncooked) eggs, seafood, or unusual foods? I ate fast food last night in the restaurant. 10-Anyone around you have the same symptoms? No 11-Does anything make it better or worse? I did not recognize anything specific.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Diagnosis” (7039 Citations), and “Cause Or Causes” (71,848 Citations)
    1C1 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS W. Scott Richardson, Mark Wilson, Jeroen Lijmer, Gordon Guyatt, and Deborah Cook The following EBM Working Group members also made substantive contributions to this section: Peter Wyer, C. David Naylor, Jonathan Craig, Luz Maria Letelier, and Virginia Moyer IN THIS SECTION Finding the Evidence Are the Results Valid? Did the Investigators Enroll the Right Patients? Was the Patient Sample Representative of Those With the Clinical Problem? Was the Definitive Diagnostic Standard Appropriate? Was the Diagnostic Process Credible? For Initially Undiagnosed Patients, Was Follow-up Sufficiently Long and Complete? What Are the Results? What Were the Diagnoses and Their Probabilities? How Precise Are the Estimates of Disease Probability? How Can I Apply the Results to Patient Care? Are the Study Patients Similar to Those in My Own Practice? Is It Unlikely That the Disease Possibilities or Probabilities Have Changed Since This Evidence Was Gathered? Clinical Resolution Copyright © 2002 by the American Medical Association 109 110 USERS’ GUIDESTOTHEMEDICAL LITERATURE CLINICAL SCENARIO A 33-Year-Old Man With Palpitations: What Is the Cause? You are a primary care physician seeing a patient from your practice, a 33-year-old man who presents with heart palpitations. He describes the new onset as episodes of fast, regular chest pounding that come on gradually, last from 1 to 2 minutes, and occur several times per day. He reports no relationship of symptoms to activities and no change in exercise tolerance. You have previously noted that this patient tends to suffer from anxiety, and he now tells you that he fears heart disease. He has no other symptoms, no personal or family history of heart disease, and he takes no medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing and Treating Shock in the Prehospital Setting
    9/3/2020 Recognizing and Treating Shock in the Prehospital Setting 1 9/3/2020 Special Thanks to Our Sponsor 2 9/3/2020 Your Presenters Dr. Raymond L. Fowler, Dr. Melanie J. Lippmann, MD, FACEP, FAEMS MD FACEP James M. Atkins MD Distinguished Professor Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine of Emergency Medical Services, Brown University Chief of the Division of EMS Alpert Medical School Department of Emergency Medicine Attending Physician University of Texas Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital Southwestern Medical Center Providence, RI Dallas, TX 3 9/3/2020 Scenario SHOCK INDEX?? Pulse ÷ Systolic 4 9/3/2020 What is Shock? Shock is a progressive state of cellular hypoperfusion in which insufficient oxygen is available to meet tissue demands It is key to understand that when shock occurs, the body is in distress. The shock response is mounted by the body to attempt to maintain systolic blood pressure and brain perfusion during times of physiologic distress. This shock response can accompany a broad spectrum of clinical conditions that stress the body, ranging from heart attacks, to major infections, to allergic reactions. 5 9/3/2020 Causes of Shock Shock may be caused when oxygen intake, absorption, or delivery fails, or when the cells are unable to take up and use the delivered oxygen to generate sufficient energy to carry out cellular functions. 6 9/3/2020 Causes of Shock Hypovolemic Shock Distributive Shock Inadequate circulating fluid leads A precipitous increase in vascular to a diminished cardiac output, capacity as blood vessels dilate and which results in an inadequate the capillaries leak fluid, translates into delivery of oxygen to the too little peripheral vascular resistance tissues and cells and a decrease in preload, which in turn reduces cardiac output 7 9/3/2020 Causes of Shock Cardiogenic Shock Obstructive Shock The heart is unable to circulate Obstruction to the forward flow of sufficient blood to meet the blood exists in the great vessels metabolic needs of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Doppler Ultrasound and Ankle–Brachial Pressure Index
    Appendix A: Doppler Ultrasound and Ankle–Brachial Pressure Index Camila Silva Coradi, Carolina Dutra Queiroz Flumignan, Renato Laks, Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan, and Bruno Henrique Alvarenga Abstract The ankle–brachial index is one of the simplest, costless, and with utmost importance tool for the diagnosis, screening, and segment of peripheral arterial disease and we need to know how to use it. The simplicity of the examination with Doppler ultrasound is undoubtedly the factor that most contributes to the adoption of this device as vascular preliminary tool. As a blood velocity detec- tor, Doppler ultrasound can be used to determine the systolic pressure of the arteries, which are the targets of the study. In this case, a sphygmomanometer is also required. They will be used in determined limb segments (upper and lower limbs) to temporarily occlude the blood flow and consequently assess the related blood pressure. The normal value of the index is 0.9–1.1. Values less than 0.9 indicate peripheral arterial disease and it is correlated with increased risk of future cardiac events. The index can be related with symptoms accord- ing to its value. When the ABI falls to 0.7–0.8 it is associated with lameness, 0.4–0.5 indicates pain, and 0.2–0.3 is typically associated with gangrene and nonhealing ulcers. Doppler Ultrasound The Austrian physicist Johann Christian Andreas Doppler (1803–1853) observing the different colorations that certain stars had questioned why this phenomenon. In 1842, he discovered the modifying effect of the vibration frequency caused by the relative movement between the source and the observer.
    [Show full text]