DOCSLIB.ORG

EAAE News Sheet 59

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Architecture, Design and Conservation Danish Portal for Artistic and Scientific Research Aarhus School of Architecture // Design School Kolding // Royal Danish Academy Editorial Toft, Anne Elisabeth Published in: EAAE news sheet Publication date: 2001 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Toft, A. E. (2001). Editorial. EAAE news sheet, (59), 5-6. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 European Association for Architectural Education Association Européenne pour l’Enseignement de l’Architecture NEWS SHEET Secretariat AEEA-EAAE April/Avril 2001 Kasteel van Arenberg B-3001 Leuven Bulletin 1/2001 tel ++32/(0)16.321694 fax ++32/(0)16.321962 59 [email protected] http://www.eaae.be Announcements/Annonces Re-integrating Theory and Design in Architectural Education / Réintégration de la Théorie et de la Conception dans l’Enseignement Architectural 19th EAAE CONFERENCE, 23-26 May 2001 A Comment From Ankara and Gazi University on the Threshold of the 19th EAAE Conference Dr. Esra Akin Fidanoglu Students at Gazi University 1 Ankara City people have a Modern kind of living; there is a As far as it is understood, we are in a synchronicity flux between the work, home and leisure in Henri age where the juxtapositions, the superimpositions, Lefebvre’s words. However, there are several the breaks take place and make the world a web universities which enrich the activities in the city. which connects the separate points to each other As one of the biggest universities in Turkey Gazi without a continuity according to Michael University is a real heterotopia in Ankara. Content/Contenu Foucault. Isn’t it true? Then it is also true that this 1 Announcements system is a must for the big number of people who Annonces 2 come from different parts of the world to live Gazi University , Faculty of Engineering and 5 Editorial 3 together in the same city. That is why the hetero- Architecture Editorial genity in the metropolis is a way of giving people The faculty’s background is based on three poly- 7 Interview the freedom to live his/her own reality. In the other technics established in 1966, 1967 and 1968. In Interview words, the relationships between the originally 1973 the polytechnics became one academy. Since 13 Article powerful places (“heterotopias” in Foucault’s 1982 it has been within the structure of the Gazi Article words) structure our lives in the flux (G. Deleuze, University as the Faculty of Engineering and 17 Reports F.Guattari) of the everyday life (in Henri Lefebvre’s Architecture. The Faculty has 3700 students and Rapports words). The heterotopias take their power from the 329 academic staff in seven departments 25 Varia well-defined and persistent structure of the activi- (Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Industrial Divers ties taking place. Here the power is to attract the Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical 27 EAAE Council Information masses and become the reason for a big flux. Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Information du conseil AEEA Architecture, City and Urban Planning). The 28 Calendar The metropolis is a very near future for Ankara Faculty is placed within the 70.000 m2 closed area. Calendrier having a population of almost four million. There are different cultures, different types of activities, The Department of Architecture has a well-estab- different kinds of social attitudes living next to lished status in Turkey with the fourth highest Editor/Editrice each other. In this presentation Ankara is seen as a grade in the central examination system. The Anne Elisabeth Toft pile of heterotopias. It will be easy to understand languages of education are 70 % Turkish and 30 % Editorial Assistance and dtp Ankara by its several faces. English. Troels Rugbjerg Announcements/Annonces The professional tradition of our department is communication and democratic atmosphere in the based on strengthening the intellectual dimension department. of the professional qualifications of the future architects. While some of our students work for the Academic and practicing studies are done individ- government or the big firms, some of them consti- ually and in groups by personal choice. Our tute a big percentage of architects in Turkey who department does not make any demands, but have private firms making their living on the archi- rewards the success of the researches and the tectural design contests. designs. Our students publish a magazine including their The primary agenda of the faculty in the near ideas on architecture and on the academic staff. future is to accredit the education system to west- ern universities in order to give our students a chance to become international. ■ Department of Architecture4 The teaching method in our department is based on introducing different design and educational 1. Technical information is available at tendencies in architecture. There are four ateliers http://www.turkiye.com having not only the full-time academic architects but also the part-time practising architects, except 2. Technical information is available at the Basic Design ateliers that have a vertical educa- http://gazi.edu.tr tion system in common; the studies of the fifth- semester students take place in the same atelier and 3. Technical information is available at they are influenced by each other in order to http://www.mmf.gazi.edu.tr increase the multiplicity of the ideas. For the same reason, a student cannot attend to the same atelier 4. Technical information is available at in both semesters of the academic year. The Final http://mim.mmf.gazi.edu.tr Project is a structure establishing the relationship between the four ateliers in a forum atmosphere and lets the students design their own projects by taking only three critiques during a semester. The construction lessons gradually become advanced parallel to the design studios. Our aim is to give the student a chance to establish his/her own ideas on architecture, and design a project according to this ideal; in other words to stand on his/her own two feet. The evaluation system is directed at not only the final product (the project) but also the develop- ment of the student during the educational process. The personal tendency of the staff member occurs not only as a satisfactory mark but as a concrete system. 30 % of the student’s mark is given in the sketching exam made during the semester. CAD is included in the teaching as a tool of repre- sentation. But the students are not prevented from improving their design methods by CAD. The academic subjects including the policy of the school is open to be questioned by all members of the department; from the research assistants to the professors. This system constitutes a strong News Sheet 59 April/Avril 2001 2 Announcements/Annonces Re-integrating Theory and Design in Architectural Education / Réintégration de la Théorie et de la Conception dans l’Enseignement Architectural 19th EAAE CONFERENCE, 23-26 May 2001 Gazi University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Architecture, Ankara, Turkey Gazi University, Rector’s Building Academics and professionals involved in the Questions: courses as jurors, teachers, instructors, advisors, etc., develop separated approaches to architectural ● How can we facilitate the communication education. This dilemma creates a gap between between academics and designers? theoretical discourse of academics and empirical approaches of designers in architectural education. ● How can we manage or construct the curricu- In order to avoid an even wider gap, theory and lum of schools of architecture in order to ensure design should be re-integrated and their unity the possibility of re-integration? should be reconstructed in architectural education. Team work and maintained communication ● How can we describe and organize a design between academics and professionals in a design course which enhances the communication course may provide for re-integration. between the instructors with either academic or professional background? In this context, the aim of the conference is to explore the teaching methods and pedagogical strategies that addresses the emerging paradigm of re-integration of theory and design. 3 News Sheet 59 April/Avril 2001 Announcements/Annonces For further information and details Aim The Organizing Committee: the conference organisers can be The conference aims to create a forum of discus- contacted at the addresses below. sion where issues and topics of mutual interest can ● Berrin Akgün be debated in relation to architectural education, ● Dr. Adnan Aksu both on a theoretical and an experimental base, ● Dr. Esin Boyacıoglu Organizing Committee which can bring together scholars, students, profes- ● Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nur Çaglar (chairman) G.U.M.M.F. Department of Architecture sors, administrators, practitioners, etc. from vari- ● Dr. Nurçin Çelik Celal Bayar Bulvari, Maltepe ous countries. ● Ylhan Kesmez 06570 Ankara/TURKEY ● Gönül Tavman tel ++90/312/231.74.00 /2646 ● Dr. Zeynep Uludag fax ++90/312/230.84.34 Structure ● Gülsu Ulukavak [email protected] The conference will be defined as a working http://www.min.mmf.gazi.edu.tr conference with plenary sessions, paper presenta- tions and poster sessions.
Recommended publications
  • 3. Face and Screen: Toward a Genealogy of the Media Façade

    3. Face and Screen: Toward a Genealogy of the Media Façade

    3. Face and Screen: Toward a Genealogy of the Media Façade Craig Buckley Abstract Craig Buckley questions the tendency to see the multi-media façade as paradigmatic of recent developments in illumination and display technologies by reconsidering a longer history of the conflicting urban roles in which façades, as media have been cast. Over the course of the nineteenth century, façades underwent an optical redefinition parallel to that which defined the transformation of the screen. Buildings that sought to do away with a classical conception of the façade also emerged as key sites of experimentation with illuminated screening technologies. Long before the advent of the technical systems animating contemporary media envelopes, the façades of storefronts, cinemas, newspaper offices, union headquarters, and information centres were conceived as media surfaces whose ability to operate on and intervene in their surroundings became more important than the duty to express the building’s interior. Keywords: Urban Screens, Architecture, Space, Physiognomy, Glass, Projection, Billboard Introduction One no longer need travel very far to encounter façades that pulse and move like electronic screens. Media façades have spread far beyond the dense com- mercial nodes with which they were once synonymous—New York’s Times Square, London’s Piccadilly Circus, Berlin’s Alexanderplatz, or Tokyo’s Shibuya. Some of the most ambitious media façades are today realized in places such as Birmingham, Graz, Tallinn, and Jeddah; Abu Dhabi, Tripoli, Montreal, and San Jose; Lima, Melbourne, Seoul, and Ningbo. Within the darkness of Buckley, C., R. Campe, F. Casetti (eds.), Screen Genealogies. From Optical Device to Environmental Medium.
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2015–16

    Annual Report and Accounts 2015–16

    Delivery and transition Annual report and accounts 2015–16 July 2016 National Assembly for Wales Assembly Commission The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this report can be found on the National Assembly’s website: www.assembly.wales Copies of this report can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay Cardiff CF99 1NA Tel: 0300 200 6565 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @assemblywales We welcome calls via the Text Relay Service. © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2016 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. Delivery and transition Annual report and accounts 2015–16 July 2016 National Assembly for Wales Assembly Commission Contents Our performance: overview.................................................................................................. 1 Llywydd’s foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction from Chief Executive and Clerk .....................................................................................
  • How Designers Are Changing Democratic Spaces and Processes 2 Designing Democracy: How Designers Are Changing Democratic Spaces and Processes

    How Designers Are Changing Democratic Spaces and Processes 2 Designing Democracy: How Designers Are Changing Democratic Spaces and Processes

    1 An inquiry by the Design Commission How designers are changing democratic spaces and processes 2 Designing Democracy: How designers are changing democratic spaces and processes An inquiry by the Design Commission March 2015 The essay collection follows a five month inquiry process Co-Chaired by John Howell MP and Richard Simmons. On behalf of the inquiry Co-Chairs, the essays were compiled by Naomi Turner, Manager of the Design Commission at Policy Connect. Contact the Design Commission Secretariat at Policy Connect, CAN Mezzanine, 32-36 Loman Street, London SE1 0EH. www.policyconnect.org.uk/apdig 3 4 Designing Democracy: How designers are changing democratic spaces and processes Contents Contents Foreword 7 John Howell OBE MP FSA and inquiry co-chair Introduction 8 Dr Richard Simmons and inquiry co-chair Designing Direct Democracy 10 William Baker and Nick Hurley, thevotingproject.com SECTION 1: PARLIAMENT BUILDINGS The Welsh Assembly 13 Lord Rogers of Riverside, Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners (RSHP) The People’s Palace 15 Carole-Anne Davies, Design Commission Wales The Scottish Parliament 17 Karen Anderson, Architecture and Design Scotland The Future of the Palace of Westminster, by Design 20 Kate Jones, Design Council Competition to host a Northern Parliament 22 Julian Smith MP and the Rt Hon Frank Field MP SECTION 2: DIGITAL OPPORTUNITIES Reflections on Design and the Digital Democracy Commission 27 Rt Hon John Bercow MP, Speaker of the House of Commons Designing Democracy 29 Julian Huppert MP interviewed by Ben Terrett, Government
  • [Richard ROGERS]

    [Richard ROGERS]

    !"#! "#$!%&"'(#$!"#!)#*$+#!,&*$-./,-01#!2!$%&'$()*+(!&',)'"*-.'"*-!/0%* !"#$%&'()"*+,"-. /'#0)/'#1234')!5667. Par : [Émilie Caron] [Marie-Christine D. Croteau] [Christelle Jacques] [Marie-Eve Renault] ARC-6021 – LA PENSÉE CONSTRUCTIVE EN ARCHITECTURE | Semestre A-11 20072. Avec les années, Lord Rogers est devenu, un acteur influant de Rohe. D’autres architectes tels que Peter et Alison Smithson et les A. APPROCHE DE L’ARCHITECTE l’architecture britannique, particulièrement apprécié pour l’architecture Eames ont aussi une forte influence sur la carrière de Rogers. En plus qu’il offre à ses usagers, comme le prétend la citation du jury du prix de ces rencontres, Rogers séjourne chez un peintre-sculpteur reconnu, Biographie Pritzker : Naum Gabo. Les nombreuses discussions avec cet artiste du Richard George Rogers est né en 1933 à Florence, en Italie. « Rogers combines his love of architecture with a profound mouvement constructivisme lui apportent une vision différente de Ayant grandi en Angleterre, il sert dans l’armée britannique de 1951 à knowledge of building materials and techniques. His l’architecture. C’est cependant Frank Lloyd Wright qui a une influence 1953, pour ensuite intégrer, en 1954 l’Architectural Association School fascination with technology is not merely for artistic effect, majeure sur l’architecture de Rogers. En effet, en étudiant ses œuvres, de Londres, alors reconnue pour son mouvement moderne en but more importantly, it is a clear echo of a building’s il comprend l’importance d’une approche architecturale en lien avec la architecture. Par la suite, il déménage aux États-Unis et achève ses program and a means to make architecture more productive nature5.
  • Johnson's Grid

    Johnson's Grid

    70 Joseph Bedford 3 In Front of Lives That Leave Nothing Behind Jesús Vassallo 19 Doll’s Houses Andrew Leach 24 Letter from the Gold Coast Jean-Louis Cohen 28 Protezione Susan Holden 33 Possible Pompidous Enrique Walker 46 In Conversation with Renzo Piano & Richard Rogers Dietrich Neumann & Juergen Schulz 60 Johnson’s Grid Goswin Schwendinger 70 Paradise Regained Gavin Stamp 76 Anti-Ugly Action Sam Jacob 89 Body Building David Jenkins 92 Kaplický’s Coexistence Paul Vermeulen & Diego Inglez de Souza 98 Babel Brasileira Irina Davidovici 103 The Depth of the Street Mark Swenarton & Thomas Weaver 124 In Conversation with John Miller Will McLean 138 Atmospheric Industries Andrew Higgott 144 Eric de Maré in Search of the Functional Tradition Nicolas Grospierre 152 The Oval Offices Diane Ghirardo 159 The Blue of Aldo Rossi’s Sky Paul Mason 173 A Return to the Ideal City 176 Contributors 70 aa Files The contents of aa Files are derived from the activities Architectural Association of the Architectural Association School of Architecture. 36 Bedford Square Founded in 1847, the aa is the uk’s only independent London wc1b 3es school of architecture, offering undergraduate, t +44 (0)20 7887 4000 postgraduate and research degrees in architecture and f +44 (0)20 7414 0782 related fields. In addition, the Architectural Association aaschool.ac.uk is an international membership organisation, open to anyone with an interest in architecture. Publisher The Architectural Association For Further Information Visit aaschool.ac.uk Editorial Board or contact the
  • Westminsterresearch Graham Stevens

    Westminsterresearch Graham Stevens

    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch Graham Stevens: Atmospheric Industries McLean, W. This is a copy of a paper published as McLean, W (2015), ‘Graham Stevens: Atmospheric Industries’, in AA Files 70 (Winter 2015), pp 138–143. It is reprinted here with permission. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 70 Joseph Bedford 3 In Front of Lives That Leave Nothing Behind Jesús Vassallo 19 Doll’s Houses Andrew Leach 24 Letter from the Gold Coast Jean-Louis Cohen 28 Protezione Susan Holden 33 Possible Pompidous Enrique Walker 44 In Conversation with Renzo Piano & Richard Rogers Dietrich Neumann & Juergen Schulz 56 Johnson’s Grid Goswin Schwendinger 66 Paradise Regained Gavin Stamp 72 Anti-Ugly Action Sam Jacob 85 Body Building David Jenkins 88 Kaplický’s Coexistence Paul Vermeulen & Diego Inglez de Souza 94 Babel Brasileira Irina Davidovici 99 The Depth of the Street Mark Swenarton & Thomas Weaver 120 In Conversation with John Miller Will McLean 134 Atmospheric Industries Andrew Higgott 140 Eric de Maré in Search of the Functional Tradition Nicolas Grospierre 148 The Oval Offices Diane Ghirardo 155 The Blue of Aldo Rossi’s Sky Paul Mason 169 A Return to the Ideal City 172 Contributors 70 Atmospheric Industries Will McLean Several years ago I visited Woolsthorpe Manor in For in those days aquatic and terrestrial settings.
  • Richard Rogers 2007 Laureate Acceptance Speech

    Richard Rogers 2007 Laureate Acceptance Speech

    Richard Rogers 2007 Laureate Acceptance Speech Good evening. I am honored and delighted to receive the Pritzker Prize for Architecture. First—I must say that I accept it, not for me alone, but for the community of designers who have inspired me, and collaborated with me through the years. I want to thank Ken Livingstone, Lord Palumbo and Tom Pritzker for their praise, and for the great contributions that they, Cindy Pritzker and her family have made, to architecture and the arts. It is deeply emotional for me to accept the award—surrounded by the friends and family I love—in the Banqueting Hall of Inigo Jones—a building that marks the first flowering of the Renaissance in Britain and a truly revolutionary building in its time. The architecture of Inigo Jones was inspired by his visits to Florence. I too owe a debt to that city, the city of my birth, the city where Donatello, Masaccio and Brunelleschi revived and rediscovered the classical tradition. Florence set the standards for cities that we still aspire to. It is also where my parents instilled in my brother Peter and me a love of beauty, a sense of order, and the importance of civic responsibility. Cities are the heart of our culture, the engines of our economy and the birthplace of our civilization. There is little that makes me happier than getting lost in a beautiful city: following its narrow passages to the grand tree lined avenues; stumbling across street theatre, sitting in a café with Ruthie watching people go by. This is my idea of heaven.
  • The Pearl on the Park

    The Pearl on the Park

    The Pearl on the Park N°33 PARK ROW ARCHITECTURE BY RICHARD ROGERS ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS THIRTY 1- TO 5-BEDROOM RESIDENCES AND PENTHOUSES ON LEVELS SIX THROUGH TWENTY-THREE, MANY WITH PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACE MAXIMUM OF THREE RESIDENCES PER FLOOR ARTIST RENDERING TABLE OF CONTENTS I ARCHITECTURE 9 II CITY HALL PARK: THE EVOLUTION OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK 17 III PRESERVED PARK VIEWS & LUMINOUS NORTHERN LIGHT 23 IV BOUTIQUE LIVING & THE PRIVILEGE OF PRIVACY 27 V THE PENTHOUSE COLLECTION 47 VI SERVICES & AMENITIES 53 VII THE PARK ROW NEIGHBORHOOD 59 VIII AN ILLUSTRIOUS TEAM 75 ARTIST RENDERING The first residential property in New York City by Pritzker Prize-winning architect Richard Rogers, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners. With N°33 Park Row, Pritzker Prize-winning architect Richard Rogers and his team at Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners expand their international portfolio of premier residential properties to New York City. This striking tower joins RSH+P’s critically acclaimed projects on the global stage, including One Hyde Park in London, the Centre Pompidou in Paris, and One Monte Carlo in Monaco. Overlooking lower Manhattan’s historic City Hall Park and offering the rare privilege of fully preserved, unobstructed park views from every residence, N°33 Park Row is a pure expression of RSH+P’s ability to capture the essence of the places their buildings occupy, as well as the lifestyle of those who call them home. Materials, design, and craftsmanship inspired by I the history of lower Manhattan are brought together to create thoroughly Architecture modern residences. The treetops and landscaped pathways of City Hall Park appear tantalizingly close through floor-to-ceiling windows.
  • Cure³ Exhibition Catalogue

    Cure³ Exhibition Catalogue

    Contents Cubes 3 Words 9 Team 196 Thanks 197 2 Cubes 3 1. Alice Anderson 29. Nick Hornby 2. Ron Arad RA 30. Paul Huxley RA 3. Miranda Argyle 31. Alison Jackson 4. Barnaby Barford 32. Vanessa Jackson RA 5. Rana Begum 33. Tess Jaray RA 6. Tony Bevan RA 34. Ben Johnson 7. Sir Peter Blake 35. Sir Anish Kapoor RA 8. Rob and Nick Carter 36. Idris Khan 9. Daniel Chadwick 37. Phillip King PPRA 10. Jake & Dinos Chapman 38. Helen Kirwan-Taylor 11. Gordon Cheung 39. Tania Kovats 12. Mat Collishaw 40. Brigitte Kowanz 13. Adam Dant 41. Andrew Logan 14. Pablo de Laborde Lascaris 42. Susie MacMurray 15. Adeline de Monseignat 43. Elizabeth Magill 16. Bouke de Vries 44. John Maine RA 17. Edmund de Waal 45. Helen Marten 18. Diana Edmunds 46. Andrew McIntosh 19. Abigail Fallis 47. Harland Miller 20. Knopp Ferro 48. Claire Morgan 21. Laura Ford 49. Mariko Mori 22. Andy Goldsworthy 50. Annie Morris 23. Lothar Götz 51. Humphrey Ocean RA 24. Elpida Hadzi-Vasileva 52. Angela Palmer 25. Hassan Hajjaj 53. Florence Peake 26. Nigel Hall RA 54. Simon Periton 27. Alex Hartley 55. Julian Perry 28. Carmen Herrera 56. Thomas J Price 57. Stephanie Quayle 78. Alfred Munkenbeck 58. Saad Qureshi (Munkenbeck + Partners) 59. Danny Rolph 79. John Pawson 60. Andrew Sabin 80. Chris Wilkinson RA 61. Nina Saunders (Wilkinson Eyre Architects) 62. Conrad Shawcross RA 81. Chris Williamson 63. Anj Smith (Weston Williamson + Partners) 64. Dillwyn Smith 65. Amy Stephens 66. Sinta Tantra 67. Troika 68. Gavin Turk 69.
  • BAA Heathrow

    BAA Heathrow

    t5 magazine 21/12/04 10:14 am Page 1 BAA Heathrow An official T5 report for the aviation community. t5 magazine 21/12/04 10:14 am Page 2 t5 magazine 21/12/04 10:14 am Page 3 > CONTENTS FOREWORD 5 ..............Mike Clasper, BAA plc chief executive THE BAA VISION 7 ..............Mick Temple, managing director, Heathrow Airport Ltd 9 ..............Paul Fox, T5 integration director THE T5 VISION 10............Tony Douglas, managing director, Terminal 5 Programme THE BA VISION 15............Phil Hogg, head of T5, British Airways 16............Robert Stewart, project leader, YRM THE T5 DESIGN 21............Mike Forster, development and design director, Terminal 5 Programme 22............Mike Davies, principal architect, the Richard Rogers Partnership 25............David Bartlet, head of design 27............Richard Payne, ATC tower development manager 29............Nick Gaines, head of IT 31............Nick Zeibland, retail director 32............Keith Heard, product leader rail station 35............Martin Johnson, head of baggage 37............Andy Mannington, production support manager THE T5 PROJECT DELIVERY 38............Andrew Wolstenholme, project director, Terminal 5 Programme 41............Mathew Riley, commercial director 43............Ian Fugeman, head of rail and tunnels 45............Phil Wilbraham, Twin Rivers project leader 48............AMEC 51............Air BP 53............Mott McDonald 54............Pascall+Watson 55............Laing O’Rourke 57............Mike Evans, head of health and safety 61............David Hunt, head of site logistics 63............Julie King, community liaison manager and David Nowell, environment manager 3 t5 magazine 21/12/04 10:14 am Page 4 Let us talk about the future Travelling Media 143 New Bond Street London W1S 2TP Tel +44 (0) 207 629 9859 Fax +44 (0) 207 499 0801 www.travellingmedia.com t5 magazine 21/12/04 10:14 am Page 5 >This supplement, in partnership with ACI EUROPE, gives you an insight into the design and construction of Heathrow’s Terminal 5, currently one of Europe’s biggest building projects.
  • While October of This Year Marks a Birthday for the AA, Aarchitecture

    While October of This Year Marks a Birthday for the AA, Aarchitecture

    AArchitecture 20 Time While October of this year marks a birthday for the AA, AArchitecture commemorates its own 20th edition with a diachronic account of the school’s alumni and layered history using Time as its theme. As Brett Steele noted at June’s graduation ceremony, the architect’s universe is defined by an assortment of temporal modes: real time, machine time and dead time all contribute to a resolution. In this sense, the newsletter can be read in two ways – either following exchanges between students and alumni or exploring the relationship between time and architecture as a profession. The interview serves as this issue’s leitmotif, bringing together distinct generations and world views in a genealogy that traces the student–tutor relationship. Mike Davies, of News from News Architectural the Association Roger Stirk Harbour + Partners, and first year student Assaf Kimmel converse about the architect’s fashion and the role of technology in the architectural project. Educator and writer Dalibor Vesely and his former student, Iolanda Costide (AADipl 1980) reflect on the AA’s ‘Golden Age’. And Pink Floyd’s Nick Mason and the editors commemorate the band’s stage designer Mark Fisher (AADipl 1971) as well as the essential role architecture played for the band. AArchitecture 20 / Term 1, 2013/14 www.aaschool.ac.uk © 2013 All rights reserved Published by the Architectural Association 36 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3ES Please send your news items for the next issue to [email protected] Student Editorial Team: Eleanor Dodman
  • Dc Office of Zoning

    Dc Office of Zoning

    51 LOUISIANA AVE. WASHINGTON, D.C. 1/4/2005 I ,,' - II' .. - - ·- f ..... 'i !! .. •' . I l _rl;;.~\~ ·/~' ' -;L~~' IJJ;i 1,1; ''· . J' ':.f_;_t;:-~).l;.l ~\.;,., ~\S.'j~~: I • '-"'".(->!. ' I l r II '• I .. .:.: - - I• ,, - .. ~- - --- r__ _, ~·"'- _ .. _ •- - -·-. ' . - . <' - - " - - -·· . - -~- 1 ·-~ ' ZONED C-3-C HEIGHT 90' ( 110' W/TDR) 130' VAR IANCE REQUEST 6.5, MAX. 591,636 SF F.A.A. 544,583 SF (9.0 MAX. 819,189 SF W ffDR) LOT OCCUPANCY 100% 76.70% SIDE YARD NONE REQUIRED NONE REQUIRED REAR YARD 27'-8" VARIES, 61'·2" MIN. RECREATION SPACE PARKING SPACE 302 403 LOADING SPACES 3@ 12' X 30', 1 @ 10' X 20' 3 @ 12' X 30' I 1 @ 1 0' X 20' ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 05-13 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.05-13 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.1B DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE SURVEYOR ,......,_., __ ....,. _...._,_...,.... ... ... Wwi·Gb~ D.C.. NIMimberS. 2004 _ --~-----_,.._, __._ ............................................... ~·.-,:t:h-*=-= .. Pt1t fDr ~ Pwm1 d SQUARE 831 LOT 17 .................................... _............................. -....... --. .. ... ~- ............. ._ ................_1111. Reclordld In 8oct 157 ,.. 170 ......................_ ....................ZIIIelll ................ -~ .......................... _... ...... ___ 15418 .................................R1g1i1111111, _, --.. ill-._.._....._._.._...... ., ......... .... -- ,...._.. .............. --- ................ .,._ ....... ZIIM!I Ill .............................~ ............ ..., ............... _.,111'1'_ Si'$1:':-··.... ... _.~ .................... en-.-.... ~ --........w~ .................. ,~- ................... ...... ~------------------- NOTW: Dolll"-b'~-,......I.I*OI',......._In ____.. _.., .. ~ol ..... - ......... ~Mi*olloa-•INiclonot,__. ....................... D STREET, N.W. rzu;a ~R~~\t:-STQRY 8Uil.D1NG z~-4 ~~~~--~------------~--~~ T.O ltOOF' 1~50' C STREET 80-15418(2004) D d ( 0 0 0 0 L 0 N 0 1122CSTREET NOTE: 81-.g height -.tng Point o.tLm ol eev.t1on 25.08' It token !rom-- ol curb-""''' L.o<-.