Nordic Journal of Educational History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nordic Journal of Educational History Volume 3 Number 1 Spring 2016 Nordic Journal of Educational History Volume 1 Number 2 Autumn 2014 Nordic Journal of Educational History SPECIAL ISSUE: THE SIXTH NORDIC CONFERENCE ON THE J HISTORY OF EDUCATION H J Ed eISSN: 2001-9076 http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh N H J Ed eISSN: 2001-9076 http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh NH Vol. 3, no. 1 The Nordic Journal of Educational History (NJEdH) is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to scho- larly excellence in the field of educational history. Its aim is to provide historians of education conduc- ting research of particular relevance to the Nordic region (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and political and geographic entities including the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Sápmi and Åland) and its educational contexts with a portal for communicating and disseminating their research. The journal particularly welcomes submissions comprising comparative studies of the educational history of the- se disparate precincts. The publishing language is English and the Nordic/Scandinavian languages. The journal applies a double blind peer review procedure and is accessible to all interested readers (no fees are charged for publication or subscription). The NJEdH publishes two issues per year (spring and autumn). For guidelines on submitting manuscripts, please visit: http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/about/submissions Editors Dr Sara Backman Prytz, Uppsala University, Sweden Assoc. Professor Lisa Rosén Rasmussen, Aarhus University, Denmark Review Editors Dr Henrik Åström Elmersjö, Umeå University, Sweden Dr David Sjögren, Uppsala University, Sweden Associate Editors Professor Anna Larsson, Umeå University, Sweden Dr Björn Norlin, Umeå University, Sweden Assoc. Professor Johannes Westberg, Uppsala University, Sweden Editorial Board Professor Emerita Sirkka Ahonen, University of Helsinki, Finland Professor Astri Andresen, University of Bergen, Norway Professor Emeritus Donald Broady, Uppsala University, Sweden Assoc. Professor Catherine Burke, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Assoc. Professor Craig Campbell, University of Sydney, Australia Professor Marcelo Caruso, Humboldt University, Germany Professor Ning de Coninck-Smith, Aarhus University, Denmark Professor Emerita Christina Florin, Stockholm University, Sweden Professor Eckhardt Fuchs, Georg Eckert Institute, Germany Professor Ólöf Garðarsdóttir, University of Iceland, Iceland Professor Ian Grosvenor, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom Professor Emeritus Harry Haue, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark Professor Veli-Pekka Lehtola, University of Oulu, Finland Professor Daniel Lindmark, Umeå University, Sweden Professor Lars Petterson, Dalarna University, Sweden Professor Jukka Rantala, University of Helsinki, Finland Professor Harald Thuen, Lillehammer University College, Norway Mailing Address Email and phone Nordic Journal of Educational History Henrik Åström Elmersjö (Editorial Team) Department of Historical, Philosophical, [email protected] and Religious Studies +4690 7866816 Umeå University SE-901 87 Umeå Webpage Sweden http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh ISSN (online): 2001-9076 The NJEdH is published with economic support ISSN (print): 2001-7766 from NOP-HS Grant for Nordic scientific journals Table of Contents Editorial Notes from the Editors 1–2 Sara Backman Prytz & Lisa Rosén Rasmussen Articles Curriculum History in Europe: A Historiographic Added Value 3–24 Daniel Tröhler Regional Differentiation and National Uniformity: Norwegian Elementary School 25–45 Legislation in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Tone Skinningsrud & Randi Skjelmo ”En ny musikuppfostran”: Reformpedagogiska anspråk i Siljanskolans bildnings- 47–74 innehåll Juvas Marianne Liljas Building Social Capital Through Civic Education in VET: A Comparative Study of 75–94 Finland and Luxembourg (1960–1970) Matias Gardin Samernas folkhögskola och de samiska språken 1942–1990 95–115 Johan Hansson Book Reviews Dissertations Sara Backman Prytz, Borgerlighetens döttrar och söner: Kvinnliga och manliga ideal bland 121 läroverksungdomar, ca. 1880–1930 (Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, 2014) Björn Norlin Per Höjeberg, Utmaningarna mot demokratins skola: Den svenska lärarkåren, nazismen 123 och kommunismen 1933–1945 (Lund: Lunds universitet, 2016) Janne Holmén Edited collections and series Anne Katrine Gjerøff, Anette Faye Jacobsen, Ellen Nørgaard & Christian Ydesen, Da skolen 126 blev sin egen: 1920–1970. Dansk skolehistorie 4: Hverdag, vilkår og visioner gennem 500 år, ed. Charlotte Appel & Ning de Coninck-Smith (Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 2014) Harald Thuen Ning de Coninck-Smith, Lisa Rosén Rasmussen & Iben Vyff, Da skolen blev alles: Efter 128 1970. Dansk skolehistorie 5: Hverdag, vilkår og visioner gennem 500 år, ed. Charlotte Appel & Ning de Coninck-Smith (Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 2015) Henrik Román Anna Larsson & Björn Norlin (eds.), Beyond the Classroom: Studies on Pupils and Informal 131 Schooling Processes in Modern Europe (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014) Christina Florin Karen E. Andreasen, Mette Buchardt, Annette Rasmussen & Christian Ydesen (eds.), Test og 135 prøvelser: Oprindelse, udvikling, aktualitet (Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 2015) Christian Lundahl Nordic Journal of Educational History Vol. 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1–2 ISSN (online): 2001-9076 ISSN (print): 2001-7766 EDITORIAL Notes from the Editors Sara Backman Prytz Lisa Rosén Rasmussen rom August 20 to 21, 2015, the Sixth Nordic Conference on the History of Ed- ucation was held at the Department of Education, Uppsala University, Sweden. FThe conference was organised as collaboration between the Department of Educa- tion, Uppsala, NJEdH and Uppsala Studies of History and Education (SHED). The conference was a great success, gathering 150 participants from all Nordic countries in 30 sessions. In the time span from early modern to contemporary times, various forms of education, from primary and secondary school to vocational and higher education set the stage for the individual sessions. Also a range of different themes was addressed. Questions of curriculum and civic education ran through a num- ber of the sessions, but also political governance, alternative pedagogies, minority education, educational spaces and methodological approaches to the history of ed- ucation was the themes holding the different sessions together. This special issue of the Nordic Journal of Educational History holds five articles from the conference. Although far from exhausting the richness and width of the conference, the articles give an insight into some of the key issues brought into present day’s Nordic studies of educational history. History of education is a vital field in the Nordic countries, gathering research- ers from different disciplines. Interdisciplinary collaborations also seem to increase within the research area. One factor contributing to this development has been the recurring Nordic Conferences on History of Education, which has served as meeting places without disciplinary fences. To support this development, the overall theme of the conference was ”interdisciplinary perspectives”. This is also reflected in the contributions to this special issue. The opening article in this issue is a contribution from conference keynote speak- er Professor Daniel Tröhler, University of Luxembourg. The article, titled “Curric- ulum History in Europe – a Historiographic Added Value”, is based on his much appreciated keynote speech held at the conference. In this article, Tröhler emphasise the role constitutions – traditionally a concern for researchers in political science – play in the history of education. Tröhler’s article is an important contribution for researchers occupied with curriculum history. Whereas Tröhler has his background in science of education, the second key- note of the conference, Jane Humphries, is a Professor of Economic History at the University of Oxford. In her keynote Humphries took outset in her quantitative and Nordic Journal of Educational History 2016. © Sara Backman Prytz and Lisa Rosén Rasmussen. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 2 Editorial qualitative studies of more than 600 diaries of British workers from the 18th and 19th centuries. Her focus was on the educational possibilities offered to the working class children and the prioritisation among the workers themselves for giving their children opportunity to learn to read and write. The second article, written by Tone Skinningsrud and Randi Skjelmo, University of Tromsø, Norway, follows Tröhlers theme and presents a new approach to inter- preting a specific country’s constitution and the links to education. The authors have in this case studied Norway and the relations between regional differentiation and national uniformity, raising the question whether the constitution of 1814 implied a shift or not. Associate Professor Juvas Marianne Liljas from Dalarna University, Sweden, has written the third article: “’En ny musikuppfostran’: Reformpedagogiska anspråk i Siljanskolans bildningsinnehåll” [“A new form of musical upbringing”: Pretenses of reform pedagogy content in the Siljan school]. In the article, Liljas tracks down the impact of the reform pedagogy movements in USA and Germany on music teaching at Siljan School in Sweden in the beginning of the 20th Century. The Siljan School stands as an example of alternative pedagogy in Sweden, but Liljas
Recommended publications
  • Article.Pdf (189.7Kb)
    Nordic Journal of Educational History Vol. 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 25–45 ISSN (online): 2001-9076 ISSN (print): 2001-7766 Regional Differentiation and National Uniformity: Norwegian Elementary School Legislation in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Tone Skinningsrud Randi Skjelmo Abstract • Previous research on Norwegian educational reforms after 1814, the year when Norway became a constitutional state, has emphasized the conservatism of the elementary education acts of 1816 and 1827. Contrary to expectations for a constitutional state, these acts did not reflect a concern for fostering politically active citizens. Neither did they follow up the enlightenment idea of teaching secular knowledge to the common people. We raise a new question concerning post-1814 educational legislation in Norway: was there an increased emphasis on national uniformity after 1814? A close reading of the earlier 1739/41 acts and the 1827 act, including the Plan and Instruction from 1834, studies of the debates in the Norwegian Parliament 1815–1827 and the temporary 1816 act on elemen- tary education, show that policy after 1814 emphasised national uniformity more than before. Despite continued local funding of elementary schooling, national policy and legislation promoted uniformity. Keywords • eighteenth and nineteenth century elementary education, citizenship education, eighteenth and nineteenth century educational legislation, history of Norwegian education, compulsory school- ing, educational uniformity, educational unification Introduction: Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Straffens Legitimitet I Oppdragelse Og Undervisning Øystein Skundberg & Harald Thuen
    Nordic Journal of Educational History Vol. 5, no. 2 (2018), pp. 17–36 ISSN (online): 2001-9076 ISSN (print): 2001-7766 ”I kjærlighedens tjeneste” Straffens legitimitet i oppdragelse og undervisning Øystein Skundberg & Harald Thuen Abstract • “In the Service of Love:” The legitimacy of punishment in child rearing and education• The article attempts to show that the Norwegian attitude towards punishment as a method of child rearing and education changed character during the last half of the nineteenth century. Legal sanctions regulating and prohibiting the use of physical punishment of children was introduced, primarily in schools but much later also in the family. The article suggests that this was the result of an ideological and political development towards valorising the integrity and humanity of children, but that it was controversial to impose restrictions on parents. It also outlines four models or perspectives on the na- ture of children and childhood that is discernible in handbooks and manuals for parents and educators, and how these models conveyed a particular understanding of the reasoning for and the consequences of punishing children as a part of rearing practices. This influenced both parents’ values and public and political debate. Keywords • punishment [straff], corporal punishment [fysisk straff], upbringing [oppdragelse], school [skole], legislation [lover] Innledning Inntil 1880-årene var de norske lovrestriksjonene i bruk av straff som oppdragelses- middel svært begrenset, men nå ble det innført innstramninger både i skolelovene og for foreldrene i hjemmet. Et halvt hundreår senere ble det innført forbud mot all bruk av fysisk straff overfor elever i folkeskolen (1936), og etter nok et halvt århundre innførte barneloven et tilsvarende forbud mot foreldres bruk av fysisk straff (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • TEORI I PRAKSIS Johan Tønnesson: Modelleseren – En Liten Gave Til Historikerne? // Kai Østberg: Sosiabilitet Som Studiefelt
    UiO NR. 4 2006 3. ÅRGANG FORTID KR. 30 TEORI I PRAKSIS Johan Tønnesson: Modelleseren – En liten gave til historikerne? // Kai Østberg: Sosiabilitet som studiefelt. Teorier om omgangsformenes historie // Frank Meyer: Verktøy kassa er full. Pierre Bourdieu for historikere // Talehandlinger og politiske språk // Relasjonisme // Det athenske demokrati mellom teori og empiri // Tid for Koselleck // Tekst/Historie Forside.indd 1 16.10.2006 08:57:20 Innholdsfortegnelse Fortid nr. 4 - 2006 6 korttekster tema: teori i praksis debattsider Konstruksjon og balanse 11 Jardar Sørvoll tema: teori i praksis Sosiabilitet. Omgangsformenes historie, mellom nesesnyting og demokratisk samfunnsomveltning 14 Kai Østberg Verktøykassa er full. Notater om Pierre Bourdieu fra et nattskift. 20 Frank Meyer Å tenke i relasjoner 25 Knut Kjeldstadli Det athenske demokrati mellom teori og empiri 30 Mona Ringvej Talehandlinger og politiske språk. Om den historiske revolusjon i studiet av politisk tenkning 36 Håkon Evju Modelleseren –En liten gave til historikerne? 43 Johan Tønnesson Tekst/Historie 52 Helge Jordheim Tid for Koselleck 56 Iver B. Neumann issn:1504-1913 trykkeri: Allkopi artikler: redaktør: Håkon Evju. temaredaktør: Geirr Olav Gram og Håkon Evju. Revolusjonsfrykt og legalisme. En studie av kornopprøret i Christiania i 1795 redaksjonen: Marius Bjørnson Hofstad, Inger Hilde Killerud, 60 Marthe Glad Munch-Møller Eirik Waage Gismervik, Thor Indseth, Ernst Bjerke, Ingjerd Veiden Brakstad, Ane Bjølgerud Hansen, Eva Marie Mathisen, Kristian Hunskaar, Anette Wilhelmsen, Therese Berg Alfsen, Mosepresten M. R. Flor og Regjeringskommisjonens surrogatarbeid Geirr Olav Gram, Tor Ivar Hansen, Gunnar Jakobsen, Jardar Sørvoll, 65 Thomas Støvind Berg, Astrid Dypvik Ernst Bjerke illustrasjon og grafisk utforming: Forside og andre illustrasjoner Luftforsvaret og infrastrukturprogrammet 1950-57 Atle Lillehovde, BA fra Birmingham Institute of Art & Design.
    [Show full text]
  • Fra Enevelde Til Konstitusjonell Stat Forutsetninger for Allmueskolelovgivning I Norge Etter 1814
    Fra enevelde til konstitusjonell stat Forutsetninger for allmueskolelovgivning i Norge etter 1814 Av Tone Skinningsrud og Randi Skjelmo Ved fredsslutningene i Kiel i 1814 i etterkant av Napoleonskrigene hadde Dan- mark-Norge vært på det tapende laget, og unionskongen Frederik 6. var blitt pålagt å avstå Norge til Sverige. Dermed var det tatt initiativ til en prosess bort fra det tid- ligere eneveldet. I en slik prosess var også det å få på plass en norsk skolelovgivning et sentralt anliggende. Det overordnede perspektivet til artikkelen er dreiningen i sko- lelovgivningen og skolepolitikken som for Norge etter 1814 kom til å omfatte riks- dekkende i stedet for regionale ordninger. Følgende forskningsspørsmål er sentrale: Hvilke forutsetninger for nytt lov- og regelverk etter 1814 ga det tidligere lovverket og allmueskolens tilstand? Hvilke motsetninger utspilte seg i forbindelse med lovarbei- det i perioden fra 1814 til 1827? Som en del av drøftingen av disse spørsmålene vil vi sammenligne det danske og det norske lov- og regelverket for allmueskolen, både på 1700-tallet og det tidlige 1800-tallet. Opptakt De danske skolelovene av 1814 ble vedtatt samme år som unionen mellom Dan- mark og Norge ble oppløst.1 Det var til sammen fem lover som ble vedtatt det- te året, et sammensatt rike nødvendiggjorde en differensiert lovgivning. Noe eget lovverk for allmueskolen i Norge var ikke blitt utformet, men i 1811 hadde den danske kongen og Kanselliet oppnevnt en egen norsk kommisjon for forbedring av allmueskolen i Norge. Sentralt i kommisjonens arbeid stod biskopen i Kristi- ania, F.J. Bech, som var opplysningsteolog og som gjennom flere år hadde utgitt en rekke skrifter om opplysningsarbeid blant allmuen og, som selv hadde ned- lagt et stort praktisk arbeid til fremme for allmueskolen.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates on Household Consumption and Production in the Patriotic Societies in Denmark-Norway (C
    Debates on Household Consumption and Production in the Patriotic Societies in Denmark-Norway (c. 1780-1814) Maria Halle Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 26 February 2016. European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Debates on Household Consumption and Production in the Patriotic Societies in Denmark-Norway (c. 1780-1814) Maria Halle Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Bartolomé Yun-Casalilla, EUI and Universidad Pablo de Olavide (supervisor) Prof. Hilde Sandvik, University of Oslo (external supervisor) Prof. Luca Molà, EUI Prof. Pia Lundqvist, University of Gothenburg © Maria Halle, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Abstract During the eighteenth century, most families in Northwestern Europe and Colonial America bought more and different goods, such as coffee, tobacco, new types of furniture and clothes. Simultaneously, the family members changed the way they worked. In order to buy the commodities available, many of them prioritised to produce more goods for the market. The families’ changing behaviour receives much attention from historians studying the changes from an economic perspective. This thesis, however, focuses on how a part of the Danish and Norwegian middle class, members of “patriotic societies,” experienced and debated the economic changes (c. 1780 -1814). Patriotic societies were local voluntary organisations that wanted to improve the “welfare” of the inhabitants. They wrote many economic and moral writings in which the changing economy was discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Elementary School Legislation in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Nordic Journal of Educational History. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Skinningsrud, T., Skjelmo, R. (2016) Regional Differentiation and National Uniformity: Norwegian Elementary School Legislation in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century. Nordic Journal of Educational History, 3(1): 25-45 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-136793 Nordic Journal of Educational History Vol. 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 25–45 ISSN (online): 2001-9076 ISSN (print): 2001-7766 Regional Differentiation and National Uniformity: Norwegian Elementary School Legislation in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Tone Skinningsrud Randi Skjelmo Abstract • Previous research on Norwegian educational reforms after 1814, the year when Norway became a constitutional state, has emphasized the conservatism of the elementary education acts of 1816 and 1827. Contrary to expectations for a constitutional state, these acts did not reflect a concern for fostering politically active citizens. Neither did they follow up the enlightenment idea of teaching secular knowledge to the common people. We raise a new question concerning post-1814 educational legislation in Norway: was there an increased emphasis on national uniformity after 1814? A close reading of the earlier 1739/41 acts and the 1827 act, including the Plan and Instruction from 1834, studies of the debates in the Norwegian Parliament 1815–1827 and the temporary 1816 act on elemen- tary education, show that policy after 1814 emphasised national uniformity more than before.
    [Show full text]
  • Sjuttonhundratal Nordic Yearbook for Eighteenth-Century Studies Volume 12
    Sjuttonhundratal Nordic Yearbook for Eighteenth-Century Studies Volume 12 2015 Sjuttonhundratal: Nordic Yearbook for Eighteenth-Century Studies An international multidisciplinary peer reviewed open access scholarly journal Published by Svenska sällskapet för 1700-talsstudier in cooperation with Suomen 1700-luvun tutkimuksen seura/Finska sällskapet för 1700-talsstudier Norsk selskap for 1700-tallsstudier Dansk selskab for 1700-talsstudier Félag um átjándu aldar fræði, Ísland Editor-in-chief: Professor David Dunér, Lund University, Sweden Co-editors: PhD, Associate Professor Johanna Ilmakunnas, University of Helsinki/ University of Turku, Finland; PhD Per Pippin Aspaas, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Assistant Professor Søren Peter Hansen, Technical University of Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark; Professor Lasse Horne Kjældgaard, Roskilde University, Denmark; PhD Hrefna Róbertsdóttir, National Archives of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland Review editors: PhD My Hellsing, Uppsala University, Sweden; Associate Professor Henrika Tandefelt, University of Helsinki, Finland; PhD Øystein Lydik Idsø Viken, University of Oslo, Norway; PhD Jens Bjerring-Hansen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Professor Margrét Eggertsdóttir, The Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic studies, Reykjavík, Iceland Language consultant: PhD Mark Davies, Lund University, Sweden Open Access adviser: Jan Erik Frantsvåg, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway Editorial board: Professor Anna Agnarsdóttir, University of Iceland, Reykjavík,
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Journal of Educational History (Njedh) Is an Interdisciplinary International Journal Dedicat- Ed to Scholarly Excellence in the Field of Educational History
    Volume Number Spring Volume Number Spring Volume 5 Number 2 2018 Nordic Journal Nordicof Journal Educationalof History Educational History Volume Number Spring Nordic Journal of EducationalJ History HSPECIAL ISSUE: EDUCATION AND HVIOLENCE Edited by Björn NorlinE ISSN: - http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh NJHd ISSN: - http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh E ISSN: - http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh NJHd Vol. 5, no. 2 (2018), Special Issue: Education and Violence TheNordic Journal of Educational History (NJEdH) is an interdisciplinary international journal dedicat- ed to scholarly excellence in the field of educational history. The journal takes special responsibility for the communication and dissemination of educational history research of particular relevance to the Nor- dic region (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and political and geographic entities including the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Sápmi and Åland), but welcomes contributions exploring the history of education in all parts of the world. The publishing language is English and the Scandinavian languages. The journal applies a double blind peer review procedure and is accessible to all interested readers (no fees are charged for publication or subscription). The NJEdH publishes articles as soon as they have been through the peer review and copy editing process, adding cumulatively to the content of an open issue each year. Special issues are normally published as the second issue of any given year. For guidelines on submitting manuscripts, please visit: http://ojs.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/about/submissions Special Issue Editor Assoc. Professor Björn Norlin, Umeå University, Sweden Journal Editors Assoc. Professor Henrik Åström Elmersjö, Umeå University, Sweden (Senior Editor) Professor Anna Larsson, Umeå University, Sweden Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fra Tilskuer Til Deltager?
    Doktoravhandlinger ved NTNU, 2016:29 Trond Bjerkås Trond Trond Bjerkås FRA TILSKUER TIL DELTAGER? Offentlig deltagelse i Norge i overgangen mellom enevelde og konstitusjonelt styre Doktoravhandling ISBN 978-82-326-1400-4 (trykt utg.) ISBN 978-82-326-1401-1 (elektr. utg.) ISSN 1503-8181 Doktoravhandlinger ved NTNU, 2016:29 ved Doktoravhandlinger NTNU philosophiae doctor philosophiae Avhandling for graden for Avhandling Det humanistiske fakultet Det humanistiske Institutt for historiske studier historiske for Institutt Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet teknisk-naturvitenskapelige Norges Trond Bjerkås FRA TILSKUER TIL DELTAGER? Offentlig deltagelse i Norge i overgangen mellom enevelde og konstitusjonelt styre Avhandling for graden philosophiae doctor Trondheim, november 2016 Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet Det humanistiske fakultet Institutt for historiske studier NTNU Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet Avhandling for graden philosophiae doctor Det humanistiske fakultet Institutt for historiske studier © Trond Bjerkås ISBN 978-82-326-1400-4 (trykt utg.) ISBN 978-82-326-1401-1 (elektr. utg.) ISSN 1503-8181 Doktoravhandlinger ved NTNU, 2016:29 Trykket av NTNU Grafisk senter Forord Denne avhandlingen er et resultat av et jubileum. I 2011 ble jeg ansatt som stipendiat tilknyttet prosjektet Grunnloven og regionene: hegemoni, kontinuitet og brudd, ved Institutt for historiske studier, NTNU. Prosjektet ble finansiert av Norges forskningsråd og var en del av Forskningsrådets satsing på 200-årsjubileet for Norges Grunnlov. Jeg vil takke prosjektlederne Ida Bull og Jakob Maliks for tilliten og Humanistisk fakultet ved NTNU for å ha finansiert stipendiatstillingen. Professor Ida Bull har vært min hovedveileder og Magne Njåstad min biveileder. Deres poengterte råd har vært til uvurderlig hjelp. Jeg er svært takknemlig for den tid og innsats de har ofret for å hjelpe meg på veien.
    [Show full text]
  • En Anklage Om Skadelig Lære I Rettssaken Mot Hans Nielsen Hauge
    En anklage om skadelig lære i rettssaken mot Hans Nielsen Hauge Jostein Garcia de Presno Høyskolelektor ved Høgskulen i Volda Stipendiat ved MF vitenskapelig høyskole [email protected] Sammendrag: Rettssaken mot Hans Nielsen Hauge, som utspant seg fra 1804 til 1814, inneholdt en anklage om de skadelige virkningene av Hauges lære. Rettens aktører ut- viste svært ulike holdninger til anklagen, alt fra å hevde at diskusjoner om dogmatiske spørsmål ikke hadde noe i en rettssak å gjøre til å kreve at Hauge måtte dømmes for religionsutøvelse i strid med statens religion. Artikkelen belyser de ulike holdningene til anklagen mot Hauges lære og undersøker hvilken rolle den spilte i rettsprosessen. Det argumenteres for at rettens syn på Hauges lære ble direkte utslagsgivende for stra!utmålingen for bruddene på konventikkelplakaten. Historien om anklagen mot Hauge kan på denne måten fungere som et nærstudium av hvordan rettsvesenet i Norge like før og etter utviklingen av egen grunnlov, forholdt seg til et krysnings- punkt for jus og teologi under skiftende politiske forutsetninger. Søkeord: Rettssak, lære, konventikkelplakaten, fanatisme, svermeri. Abstract: "e trial against Hans Nielsen Hauge, which lasted from 1804–1814, contained an accusation about the harmful consequences of Hauge’s teachings. "e trial’s parties reached very di!erent conclusions regarding Hauge’s harmful teachings: from claiming that discussions about dogmatic issues had no place in court, to demanding that Hauge be convicted of the practice of an illegal religion. "is article discusses the speci#c role that the accusation played in the trial, and its in$uence on the outcome. I argue that together with the violations against the Conventicle Act, the court’s valuation of Hauge’s teachings determined the punishment Hauge received.
    [Show full text]
  • Eidsvollsmenn Fra Borg Og Andre Sentrale Aktører I 1814
    Eidsvollsmenn fra Borg og andre sentrale aktører i 1814 Riksdagsmennene på Eidsvoll ble valgt på tre ulike måter: Kjøpstedene valgte egne utsendinger (fra en til fire, avhengig av byens størrelse), hvert amt valgte tre representanter hvorav en skulle være bonde, og i tillegg valgte de militære enhetene sine egne representanter. For den siste gruppen kan det være litt vanskelig å si hvilket geografisk distrikt de kom fra, da de ofte tjenestegjorde i et annet distrikt enn de opprinnelig tilhørte. Jeg har tatt med noen militære med klar tilknytning til vårt bispedømme, som representerte militære avdelinger på Eidsvoll. I forhold til befolkningen var militære, embetsmenn og kjøpmenn fra byene sterkt over-representert på Eidsvoll, mens bøndene var under- representert. At bøndene i det hele tatt var representert, var likevel et viktig skritt. Den mest kjente Eidsvollsmannen fra det nåværende Borg bispedømme er utvilsomt Christian Magnus Falsen (1782-1830) fra Ås. Han var født i Christiania, og kom fra en familie av jurister. Selv ble han utdannet jurist fra København i 1802, og i 1808 ble han sorenskriver i Follo og bosatte seg på gården Vollebekk i Ås. Han utarbeidet, sammen med lektor Adler, et forslag til grunnlov allerede i februar 1814. Dette var preget av liberale idéer fra Frankrike og USA, og fikk betydelig påvirkning på den endelige grunnloven. – Falsen var blant de yngste på Eidsvoll, bare 32 år gammel, men han ble formann for den viktige konstitusjonskomiteen, og satt som riksforsamlingens president en tid. Sammen med Georg Sverdrup ledet han «selvstendighetspartiet» (også kalt prinsepartiet), og lå i strid med grev Wedel-Jarlsberg, som ledet «unionspartiet».
    [Show full text]