Views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portalðthe Management Tool, the Generator, and the Gatekeeper: Qualitative Study (E17) Sam Nordfeldt, Lena Hanberger, Carina Berterö

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portalðthe Management Tool, the Generator, and the Gatekeeper: Qualitative Study (E17) Sam Nordfeldt, Lena Hanberger, Carina Berterö Journal of Medical Internet Research Impact Factor (2018): 4.945 - ranked #1 medical informatics journal by Impact Factor Volume 12 (2010), Issue 2 ISSN: 1438-8871 Editor in Chief: Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH Contents Original Papers An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis (e8) Olga Damman, Ylva van den Hengel, A van Loon, Jany Rademakers. 3 Clinician Search Behaviors May Be Influenced by Search Engine Design (e25) Annie Lau, Enrico Coiera, Tatjana Zrimec, Paul Compton. 24 Mobile Therapy: Case Study Evaluations of a Cell Phone Application for Emotional Self-Awareness (e10) Margaret Morris, Qusai Kathawala, Todd Leen, Ethan Gorenstein, Farzin Guilak, Michael Labhard, William Deleeuw. 33 Dirt Cheap and Without Prescription: How Susceptible are Young US Consumers to Purchasing Drugs From Rogue Internet Pharmacies? (e11) Lana Ivanitskaya, Jodi Brookins-Fisher, Irene OÂBoyle, Danielle Vibbert, Dmitry Erofeev, Lawrence Fulton. 55 Perspectives of Family Physicians on Computer-assisted Health-risk Assessments (e12) Farah Ahmad, Harvey Skinner, Donna Stewart, Wendy Levinson. 70 Effects of a Financial Incentive on Health Researchers' Response to an Online Survey: a Randomized Controlled Trial (e13) Paul Wilson, Mark Petticrew, Mike Calnan, Irwin Nazareth. 82 Sharing Medical Data for Health Research: The Early Personal Health Record Experience (e14) Elissa Weitzman, Liljana Kaci, Kenneth Mandl. 91 Supporting Informed Decision Making Online in 20 Minutes: An Observational Web-log Study of a PSA Test Decision Aid (e15) Natalie Joseph-Williams, Rhodri Evans, Adrian Edwards, Robert Newcombe, Patricia Wright, Richard Grol, Glyn Elwyn. 101 Patient and Parent Views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes PortalÐthe Management Tool, the Generator, and the Gatekeeper: Qualitative Study (e17) Sam Nordfeldt, Lena Hanberger, Carina Berterö. 112 Sharing Health Data for Better Outcomes on PatientsLikeMe (e19) Paul Wicks, Michael Massagli, Jeana Frost, Catherine Brownstein, Sally Okun, Timothy Vaughan, Richard Bradley, James Heywood. 124 Online Communication Between Doctors and Patients in Europe: Status and Perspectives (e20) Silvina Santana, Berthold Lausen, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Catherine Chronaki, Per Kummervold, Janne Rasmussen, Tove Sorensen. 136 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2010 | vol. 12 | iss. 2 | p.1 XSL·FO RenderX Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (e23) David Samoocha, David Bruinvels, Nieke Elbers, Johannes Anema, Allard van der Beek. 168 Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review (e18) Tom Van De Belt, Lucien Engelen, Sivera Berben, Lisette Schoonhoven. 185 Preventing the Obesity Epidemic by Second Generation Tailored Health Communication: An Interdisciplinary Review (e24) Heidi Enwald, Maija-Leena Huotari. 214 Orginal Paper Health Information Technology to Facilitate Communication Involving Health Care Providers, Caregivers, and Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review (e22) Stephen Gentles, Cynthia Lokker, K McKibbon. 150 Review Clinical Effects of Home Telemonitoring in the Context of Diabetes, Asthma, Heart Failure and Hypertension: A Systematic Review (e21) Guy Paré, Khalil Moqadem, Gilles Pineau, Carole St-Hilaire. 199 Letter The Touro 12-Step: A Systematic Guide to Optimizing Survey Research with Online Discussion Boards (e16) Eric Ip, Mitchell Barnett, Michael Tenerowicz, Paul Perry. 233 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2010 | vol. 12 | iss. 2 | p.2 XSL·FO RenderX JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH Damman et al Original Paper An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis Olga C Damman1, MSc; Ylva KA van den Hengel2, MSc; A Jeanne M van Loon2, PhD; Jany Rademakers1, PhD 1NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands 2RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), Bilthoven, the Netherlands Corresponding Author: Olga C Damman, MSc NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht the Netherlands Phone: 31 30 272 97 00 Fax: 31 30 272 97 29 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: On more and more websites, consumers are provided with public reports about health care. This move toward provision of more comparative information has resulted in different information types being published that often contain contradictory information. Objective: The objective was to assess the current state of the art in the presentation of online comparative health care information and to compare how the integration of different information types is dealt with on websites. The content analysis was performed in order to provide website managers and Internet researchers with a resource of knowledge about presentation formats being applied internationally. Methods: A Web search was used to identify websites that contained comparative health care information. The websites were systematically examined to assess how three different types of information (provider characteristics and services, performance indicators, and health care user experience) were presented to consumers. Furthermore, a short survey was disseminated to the reviewed websites to assess how the presentation formats were selected. Results: We reviewed 42 websites from the following countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Sweden. We found the most common ways to integrate different information types were the two extreme options: no integration at all (on 36% of the websites) and high levels of integration in single tables on 41% of the websites). Nearly 70% of the websites offered drill down paths to more detailed information. Diverse presentation approaches were used to display comparative health care information on the Internet. Numbers were used on the majority of websites (88%) to display comparative information. Conclusions: Currently, approaches to the presentation of comparative health care information do not seem to be systematically selected. It seems important, however, that website managers become aware of the complexities inherent in comparative information when they release information on the Web. Important complexities to pay attention to are the use of numbers, the display of contradictory information, and the extent of variation among attributes and attribute levels. As for the integration of different information types, it remains unclear which presentation approaches are preferable. Our study provides a good starting point for Internet research to further address the question of how different types of information can be more effectively presented to consumers. (J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e8) doi:10.2196/jmir.1191 KEYWORDS Consumer health information; information display; decision making; Internet; international comparison; content analysis http://www.jmir.org/2010/2/e8/ J Med Internet Res 2010 | vol. 12 | iss. 2 | e8 | p.3 (page number not for citation purposes) XSL·FO RenderX JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH Damman et al mixed: higher numbers of features on websites have been Introduction associated with both positive [16,17] and negative [18] attitudes. Public reporting of comparative health care information has In this context, the number of different types of information become increasingly important in several countries. Comparative and the structure in which these are presented are important health care information is information by which consumers can [19]. make explicit comparisons between the performances of health With respect to public comparative health care information, van care providers or health plans in order to make an informed Loon and Tolboom [20] defined three different information choice. In the United States and the United Kingdom, efforts types. The first type is information about the characteristics and to make this kind of information publicly available have been services provided by individual health care providers and health ongoing for about fifteen years. The aims are to increase public care facilities. This is factual information about providers' accountability and to support consumer choice in health care names, addresses, and the geographic region in which health and indirectly to improve the quality of health services. Health care is provided as well as information about the type of provider care policy in the Netherlands currently focuses on transparency (eg, academic or non-academic hospital), provider specialty, as well: health care consumers are encouraged to make use of available facilities, provider's religion, costs of services, and public comparative information about health care services and waiting times. The second information type is information about quality [1,2]. Dutch consumers have been provided with public quality of health care based on performance indicators, usually reports of health care information in newspapers and magazines derived from existing provider registrations (ie, administrative since the late 1990s. In addition, comparative health care records) or registrations required by governments and information has been published on the Internet in the established for public reporting purposes. These concern medical Netherlands for the past few years. and health care performance information based on relatively The number of websites containing comparative health care factual information relating to a particular health facility such reports
Recommended publications
  • March 2003 Table of Contents
    TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH AGENDA AND RESEARCH RESOURCES FOR HEALTH STATUS ASSESSMENT AND SUMMARY HEALTH MEASURES Workshop Report March 2003 Table of Contents Objective, by Donald L. Patrick, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. ……………………………………………….3 Health Status and Summary Measures of Population Health: Recommendations Past and Future, by Marthe Gold, M.D. …………...…………………..…….…………………9 Commentary, by Dean Jamison, Ph.D. ………..………………………………….……24 Understanding and Comparing Existing Summary Measures of Health and Health-Related Quality of Life: The State of the Art, by Dennis G. Fryback, Ph.D.…….….28 Commentary, by William Furlong, M.Sc. ...……………….…...……………………...59 The Ten Ds of Health Outcomes Measurement for the 21st Century, by Colleen A. McHorney, Ph.D. ...……………………………………………………………....66 Thoughts on Assorted Issues in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment, by Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. ...………………………………………………………………….……111 Current State of the Art in Preference-Based Measures of Health and Avenues for Further Research, by John Brazier, Ph.D., M.Sc. …..…………………………………....120 Commentary, by Pennifer Erickson, Ph.D. ..………………….………………………147 On the Policy Implications of Summary Measures of Health Status, by Michael C. Wolfson, Ph.D., B.Sc. …………………………….……………………………151 Commentary, by Robert M. Kaplan, Ph.D. .……………….…………….……………190 2 Objective Donald L. Patrick, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. The objective of this meeting was to address the measurement of population health status in the United States. Over the last 75 years, interest in population health status assessment has risen steadily. Many forces have contributed to this increased attention to population health. Foremost is the interest in how population health levels are affected by technological advances, such as the development of vaccines or surgical advances.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
    Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Feedback's Role in Assessing Physician Quality
    DePaul Journal of Health Care Law Volume 14 Issue 2 Spring 2012 Article 7 October 2015 "How's My Doctoring?" Patient Feedback's Role in Assessing Physician Quality Ann Marie Marciarille Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl Recommended Citation Ann M. Marciarille, "How's My Doctoring?" Patient Feedback's Role in Assessing Physician Quality, 14 DePaul J. Health Care L. 361 (2012) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl/vol14/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Health Care Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "HOW'S MY DOCTORING?" PATIENT FEEDBACK'S ROLE IN ASSESSING PHYSICIAN QUALITY Ann Marie Marciarille* ABSTRACT A society-wide consumer revolution is underway with the rise of online user-generated review websites such as Yelp, Angie's List, and Zagat. Service provider reviews are now available with an intensity and scope that attracts increasing numbers of reviewers and readers. Health care providers are not exempt from this new consumer generated scrutiny though they have arrived relatively late to the party and as somewhat unwilling guests. The thesis of this article is that online patient feedback on physicians is relevant and valuable even though it is also uncomfortable for health care providers. This is because the modem physician-patient relationship is sufficiently commercial that physician reputation information is amenable to information sharing in this format.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Health System Reform Environmental Scan
    January 2011 STRATEGIC INNOVATIONS FOR AFFORDABLE, SUSTAINABLE HEALTH CARE: A Model for Health System Reform Environmental Scan Table of Contents 1 ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS 1 3 ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS 20 Accountable Care Organizations .................................................................. 1 Application Service Provider (ASP) Hosting Strategy ................................. 20 Physician Group Practice Demonstration ......................................................................... 2 EMR Facilitated Process Redesign – SIX SIGMA ...................................... 21 Brookings-Dartmouth ACO Collaborative ......................................................................... 3 Hospital Sponsored Incentives to Drive Physician EMR Adoption ............. 22 Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA ............................................................................................. 3 Adoption of Common Security Frameworks (CSF) to Manage New Security Aultman Health Foundation, Aultman Hospital, and AultCare Health Plans, Canton, Requirements ....................................................................................... 24 OH ................................................................................................................................. 5 Integrated Practice Management, EMR & Revenue Cycle Management Solutions ............................................................................................... 25 2 DISEASE MANAGEMENT 7 Disease/Risk Screening or Assessment ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEILLE NSA Paper Based on D2.8 Clean JA V5
    FP7 – SEC- 2011-284725 SURVEILLE Surveillance: Ethical issues, legal limitations, and efficiency Collaborative Project This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 284725 SURVEILLE Paper on Mass Surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States of America Extract from SURVEILLE Deliverable D2.8: Update of D2.7 on the basis of input of other partners. Assessment of surveillance technologies and techniques applied in a terrorism prevention scenario. Due date of deliverable: 31.07.2014 Actual submission date: 29.05.2014 Start date of project: 1.2.2012 Duration: 39 months SURVEILLE WorK PacKage number and lead: WP02 Prof. Tom Sorell Author: Michelle Cayford (TU Delft) SURVEILLE: Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Commission Services) Executive summary • SURVEILLE deliverable D2.8 continues the approach pioneered in SURVEILLE deliverable D2.6 for combining technical, legal and ethical assessments for the use of surveillance technology in realistic serious crime scenarios. The new scenario considered is terrorism prevention by means of Internet monitoring, emulating what is known about signals intelligence agencies’ methods of electronic mass surveillance. The technologies featured and assessed are: the use of a cable splitter off a fiber optic backbone; the use of ‘Phantom Viewer’ software; the use of social networking analysis and the use of ‘Finspy’ equipment installed on targeted computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Et L'industrie Française
    Boeing France Boeing et l’industrie française L’innovation se nourrit d’une passion commune Boeing et l’industrie française L’innovation se nourrit d’une passion commune Boeing en France Le groupe Boeing 05 Boeing et la France, un partenariat fructueux 14 Premier groupe aéronautique mondial 06 L’élite de l’industrie française au service 15 80 ans de leadership dans l’aviation civile de l’excellence Boeing 16 Le 777, le long-courrier préféré du marché 07 14 fournisseurs ont rejoint la « Boeing French Team » 17 Le 747-8, le nouveau géant des airs depuis 2005 18 Une offre de services complète 08 L’industrie française à bord du 787 Dreamliner 19 Le 787 Dreamliner, l’avion de rêve 09 Nos partenaires témoignent 20 L’innovation et l’expertise au service de la défense 10 Boeing et Air France, des liens pérennes et de l’espace 11 Boeing et les compagnies françaises 22 Imaginer l’aéronautique de demain 12 Boeing, fournisseur de l’armée française 24 Une démarche de pionnier pour l’environnement 13 L’engagement auprès des Restos du Cœur 26 Un peu d’histoire Boeing France 03 Décrocher la lune Depuis près de cent ans, Boeing s’emploie à relever tous les défis. Des premiers avions de ligne à la conquête de la lune, ses réalisations, placées sous le signe de l’audace et de l’innovation, se sont traduites par de nombreux exploits technologiques et commerciaux. Mais rien n’est Boeing a prendre une décision unique avec la création jamais acquis, et chaque jour est à réinventer.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Technology Sales: How Corporations Can Avoid Assisting Repressive Regimes
    Human Rights and Technology Sales: How Corporations Can Avoid Assisting Repressive Regimes By Cindy Cohn, Trevor Timm, & Jillian C. York April 2012 Background For years, there has been ample evidence that authoritarian governments around the world are relying on technology produced by American, Canadian, and European companies to facilitate human rights abuses, and the current indication is that the trend is growing. From software that enables the filtering and blocking of online content to tools that help governments spy on their citizens, many such companies are actively serving autocratic governments as “repression’s little helper.” The reach of these technologies is astonishingly broad: governments can listen in on cell phone calls,1 use voice recognition to scan mobile networks, use facial recognition to scan photographs online and offline, read emails and text messages, track a citizen’s every movement using GPS, and can even change email contents while en route to a recipient.2 Some tools are installed using the same type of malicious malware and spyware used by online criminals to steal credit card and banking information.3 They can secretly turn on webcams built into personal laptops and microphones in cell phones not being used.4 Other tools and services allow for governments to block entire categories of websites, preventing citizens from accessing vital information. And these tools are being implemented on such a massive scale in some places that they can be used to track and spy on every person in an entire country. This is a phenomenon that spans the globe and implicates dozens of corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • BOEING CO NOTE : If a Parent Company for This Entity Is Reported, Click the Link on Its Parent DUNS Number Below to See Its Consolidated Profile
    Created on : 02/21/2013 01:35:14 © FEDMINE™ All Rights Reserved Email: [email protected] URL: www.fedmine.us ● Hyperlinks in FEDMINE HTML & PDF documents work for subscribers only. You may request a FREE TRIAL to view all reports in the system ● Parent & subsidiary company relationships are no longer included in the FPDS-NG data in order to honor the Federal Government’s licensing agreement with Dun & Bradstreet. For that reason it is possible those relationships do not reflect the most current status in our system FEDMINE™ PRIME CONTRACTOR COMPANY PROFILE LAST UPDATED: 07/30/2011 01:31:39 AM BOEING CO NOTE : If a Parent company for this entity is reported, click the link on its Parent DUNS number below to see its consolidated Profile. Parent subsidiary relationships are no longer provided due to the Federal Government's agreement with D&B, and therefore, some relationships may not reflect the most current status in our system. All OBLIGATED DOLLARS PERTAIN TO PRIME CONTRACTING DOLLARS ONLY. IF PURCHASED SEPARATELY SUBCONTRACTS DATA IS INCLUDED IN ALL PROFILES SUB CONTRACTS AWARDED VIEW PROFILE BY SUBSIDIARIES CONTRACT AWARDS IN LAST 30 DAYS CONTRACTS BY PLACE OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS BY CONTRACTING OFF. FEDBIZOPPS AWARDS GAO PROTESTS FILED BY COMPANY GWAC CONTRACTS CONTRACTS BY NAICS CODES CONTRACTS BY PSC CODES CONTRACTS BY SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS CONTRACTS BY SETASIDE TYPE CONTRACTS BY PRICING TYPE ORGANIZATION DETAILS COMPARATIVE 5 - YEAR FEDERAL CONTRACTS VIEW DUNS: 009256819 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Parent DUNS: 009256819 AGENCY Fedmine ID: F330698520 0 $ 7,039,132,983 $ 6,124,563,126 $ 5,166,127,597 $ 4,779,379,771 Known As: BOEING COMPANY THE 1700 - NAVY Address: 100 N RIVERSIDE PLZ CHICAGO 0 $ 2,077,542,702 $ 3,584,111,494 $ 3,187,150,820 $ 4,822,574,368 IL 60606-1501 2100 - ARMY USA GEO Location: FEDPOINT $ 12,277,811 $ 964,537,879 $ 1,590,564,876 $ 1,426,519,327 $ 1,806,894,750 9700 - DEFENSE County Code: 031 County: COOK $ 226,696 $ 1,186,915 $ 1,526,886 $ 1,615,465 $ 370,624 1500 - JUSTICE Cong.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association Between Care Experiences and Parent Ratings Of
    Health Services Research r Health Research and Educational Trust DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01234.x RESEARCH ARTICLE The Association between Care Experiences and Parent Ratings of Care for Different Racial, Ethnic, and Language Groups in a Medicaid Population Victoria Wilkins, Marc N. Elliott, Andrea Richardson, Paula Lozano, and Rita Mangione-Smith Objective. To examine the association between care experiences and parent ratings of care within racial/ethnic/language subgroups. Data Source. National Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Benchmarking Database 3.0 (2003–2006). Sample Characteristics. 111,139 parents of minor Medicaid managed care enrollees. Study Design. Cross-sectional observational study predicting ‘‘poor’’ (0–5 on 0–10 scale) parent ratings of personal doctor, specialist, health care, and health plan from care experiences for different parent race/ethnicity/language subgroups (Latino/Spanish, Latino/English, white, and black). Principal Findings. Care experiences had similar associations with the probability of poor parent ratings of care across the four racial/ethnic/language subgroups (p4.20). A one standard deviation improvement in the doctor communication care experience was associated with about half the frequency of poor ratings of care for personal doctor and health care in all subgroups (po.05). Sensitivity analysis of individual communi- cation items found that failure to provide explanations to children predicted poor ratings of care only among whites, who also weighed the length of physician interaction more heavily than other subgroups. Conclusions. Communication-based interventions may improve experiences and ratings of care for all subgroups, although implementation of these interventions may need to consider preferences associated with race, ethnicity, and language.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Future Wind Tunnel Testing Helps Boeing Shape 737 MAX— and the Future of Flight
    Frontierswww.boeing.com/frontiers JULY 2012 / Volume XI, Issue III Shaping the future Wind tunnel testing helps Boeing shape 737 MAX— and the future of flight PB BOEING FRONTIERS / JULY 2012 1 BOEING FRONTIERS / JULY 2012 On the Cover Tunnel vision Computer simulations are crucial in developing the aerodynamics of Boeing aircraft, but at some point it’s time to turn on the wind! From 22 the B-47 bomber to the 787 Dreamliner, what Boeing engineers learn from testing models in wind tunnels has shaped the future of flight. Today, another Boeing jet, the 737 MAX, is undergoing this rigorous testing that comes early in the development process. COVER IMAGE: BOEING ENGINEER JIM CONNER PREPARES A MODEL OF THE 737 MAX FOR TESTING IN THE TRANSONIC WIND TUNNEL IN SEATTLE. BOB FERGUSON/BOEING PHOTO: A LOOK AT THE HIGH-SPEED DIFFUSER OF THE BOEING VERTICAL/SHORT TAKEOFF AND LANDING WIND TUNNEL IN PHILADELPHIA. FRED TROILO/BOEING Ad watch The stories behind the ads in this issue of Frontiers. Inside cover: Page 6: Back cover: This ad was created This ad for the new Every July, the Boeing to highlight Boeing’s 747-8 Intercontinental is Store commemorates Commercial Crew running in Chinese trade Boeing’s anniversary Development System, and business publications with a weeklong a reliable, cost-effective and Aviation Week. celebration, offering and low-risk solution The headline speaks to special merchandise, for commercial space the airplane’s striking gifts and free birthday transportation. The beauty (new Boeing Sky cake in the stores. ad is running in trade Interior), classic elegance This ad for the 2012 publications.
    [Show full text]
  • A N N U a L . R E P O
    ANNUAL. REPORT 1 40 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE This culture begins with the Jupiter Medical Center Board of Trustees. We have an extremely competent and knowledgeable board that has the best interests of the community in mind with every decision. Our Trustees have great expectations for Jupiter Medical Center, and they thoughtfully propel us to achieve world-class levels in all facets of care. They are extraordinary local leaders who understand our community's needs and support our desire to remain a thriving, independent, not-for-profit medical center. The fact that we are able to thrive when many health care organizations are consolidating is a testament to our community. We are more than fortunate to have a wide base of philanthropic supporters and dedicated volunteers who both enable and celebrate our many successes. It is a privilege to report that FY2018 was a remarkable year that ultimately paved the way for even greater accomplishments. In June This is an incredibly exciting time for Jupiter Medical Center. We have a 2018, we completed our acute recovery unit for cardiac patients and 40-year legacy of excellence of which we are so very proud. Our founder, by December 2018 we were ready to launch our new Comprehensive Dr. George Ford, had a wonderful combination of vision and passion, Stroke Center with 3D biplane technology. The James J. Felcyn yet even he could hardly have imagined that the community hospital and Louise Brien Felcyn Observation Unit and the Timothy and he helped establish would today be regarded as a world-class regional Jayne Donahue Cardiac Surgery Program are expected to launch medical center.
    [Show full text]
  • By Working with These Institutions and Establishing International
    GlOBal BOEING “ By working with these institutions Boeing’s international and establishing international strategy focuses research sites, we demonstrate on mutually that we’re committed to building beneficial a long-term presence in partnerships important markets.” By Bill seil – John Tracy, Boeing chief technology officer and senior vice president, Engineering, Operations & Technology round the globe, Boeing is providing the best and most innovative Boeing is enhancing its presence includes entities from 35 nations for sites, we demonstrate that we’re pHOTOS: Boeing’s partnerships developing partnerships that products and services at affordable prices. internationally by hiring local talent and research in diverse areas including committed to building a long-term around the world are fueling growth benefit its customers, business The company also has worked to meet deploying U.S. employees at key locations biofuels, manufacturing processes, presence in important markets.” in research and development and a making the company more competitive. partners and local economies. In return, the specific needs of individual customers around the world. More than 8,500 of structures and robotics. In addition to providing the best, (Clockwise, from top left) Composites the company is strengthened by growing and regions. Boeing’s 164,000 employees work “Because there’s more than $1 trillion most advanced products, the company research in the United Kingdom; new sales and tapping the best technologies “Doing business in today’s global outside the United
    [Show full text]