DOCSLIB.ORG

North Whiteley Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Whiteley Business Case Revised North Whiteley Business Case On behalf of The North Whiteley Consortium Project Ref: 16659 | Rev: 01 | Date: 30 March 2016 Office Address: 3rd Floor, Exchange Place 3, 3 Semple Street, Edinburgh EH3 8BL T: 0131 297 7010 E: [email protected] Whiteley Way Business Case North Whiteley Document Control Sheet Project Name: North Whiteley Project Ref: 16659 Report Title: North Whiteley Business Case Doc Ref: Version 2 Date: 30 March 2016 Name Position Signature Date Director of Prepared by: Paul McCartney 22/12/2015 Economics Reviewed by: Tony Russell Partner 23/12/2015 Approved by: Tony Russell Partner 23/12/2015 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Take on board comments from 01 30/03/2016 PMc TR TR AECOM 02 03 Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2015 ii Whiteley Way Business Case North Whiteley Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scheme Description ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Process of Engagement ................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Resolution of Grant Consent ......................................................................................... 5 2 Strategic Case ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Setting the Scene .......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 North Whiteley Development Description and Rationale .............................................. 9 2.4 Current Transport Situation ......................................................................................... 13 2.5 Highway Impact and Mitigation ................................................................................... 19 2.6 Sustainable Transport Strategy ................................................................................... 24 2.7 Travel Plan .................................................................................................................. 38 2.8 Benefits of Delivering North Whiteley .......................................................................... 40 2.9 Fit with Policy Objectives ............................................................................................. 42 2.10 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 58 3 Economic Case .......................................................................................................................... 60 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 60 3.2 Model Used ................................................................................................................. 60 3.3 Economic Case Results / Findings .............................................................................. 63 4 Financial Case ........................................................................................................................... 70 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 70 4.2 Costs ........................................................................................................................... 70 4.3 Funding Arrangements ................................................................................................ 74 4.4 Robustness of Costs ................................................................................................... 75 4.5 Risk Management Strategy ......................................................................................... 75 5 Commercial Case ...................................................................................................................... 79 5.1 Commercial Viability .................................................................................................... 79 5.2 Proposed Procurement Strategy for Design and Construction ................................... 79 5.3 Contract Management ................................................................................................. 79 5.4 Risk Management Strategy ......................................................................................... 80 6 Management Case ..................................................................................................................... 81 6.1 Project Management ................................................................................................... 81 6.2 Project Plan ................................................................................................................. 81 6.3 Risk Management........................................................................................................ 81 6.4 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................... 82 7 Appendix A – Phasing of Highway Development .................................................................. 84 7.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 84 iii Whiteley Way Business Case North Whiteley Figures Figure 1.1 North Whiteley Strategic Road and Highways Improvements Initial and Revised Options ... 2 Figure 1.2 Winchester District Location Map........................................................................................... 3 Figure 2.1 Map of North Whiteley development .................................................................................... 11 Figure 2.2 North Whiteley Strategic Road and Highway Improvement Original and Revised Options. 20 Figure 3.1 SRTM Modelled Area Definitions ......................................................................................... 61 Figure 3.2 The elements of the Sub Regional Transport Model ........................................................... 62 Figure 3.3 The SRTM and the Interaction of the Various Models ......................................................... 63 Figure A1: Completed Highway works May 2017 ................................................................................. 85 Figure A2: Completed Highway Works May 2018 ................................................................................ 86 Figure A3: Completed Highway Works May 2019 ................................................................................ 87 Tables Table 2.1 Phasing of Housing Units in North Whiteley ......................................................................... 12 Table 2.2: Existing Public Bus Services in Whiteley and Burridge........................................................ 15 Table 2.3 Existing Rail Services – Swanwick Station ........................................................................... 16 Table 2.4: Existing Rail Services – Botley Station ................................................................................ 17 Table 2.5: 2026 Base + Development (with mitigation) Total Traffic Flow ............................................ 23 Table 2.6 M27 Junction 9 2026 Base + Development (with mitigation) Model Results ........................ 24 Table 2.7 Phase 2 Bus Service Package .............................................................................................. 29 Table 2.8 Phase 3 Bus Service Package .............................................................................................. 30 Table 2.9 Phase 4 Bus Service Package .............................................................................................. 31 Table 2.10 Transport Requirement for Primary-age pupils ................................................................... 31 Table 2.11 Winchester District Council’s Residential Vehicle Parking Standards ................................ 33 Table 2.12 Proposed Residential Mix and Associated Vehicle Parking ................................................ 34 Table 2.13 Winchester District Council’s Residential Cycle Parking Standards ................................... 34 Table 2.14 Proposed Residential Mix and Associated Cycle Parking .................................................. 35 Table 2.15 On-site school parking standards .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester
    Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester Design and Access Statement February 2021 Revision Date Revision Notes Prepared by Authorised by * 2020-12-18 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev B 2020-12-22 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev C 2021-01-04 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev D 2021-01-06 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev E 2021-01-29 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev F 2021-02-02 VTS/IDP KD/SR \\IDPSVR01\Projects\N81-2818 Bosham, BDW S'ton\Documents\D&A\Bosham Design and Access Statement.indd [INDD Modified 2021-02-02 10:49], [PDF Output 2021-02-02 10:55] 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction Section 4: Access Proposals 1.1 Introduction 6 4.1 Connections, Movement and Street Hierarchy 38 1.2 Summary of Proposals 7 4.2 Parking 39 Section 5: BHL Assessment Section 2: The Site 5.1 Building for a Healthy Life Assessment 42 2.1 Site Location 10 2.2 Site Description 11 2.3 Site Photographs 12 2.4 Site Context 13 2.5 Constraints and Opportunities 15 2.6 Parish Council Consultation 16 2.7 Layout Analysis 17 2.8 Design Concept 18 Section 3: Design Proposals 3.1 Layout 20 3.2 Accommodation 22 3.3 Affordable Homes 23 3.4 Community / Village Hall 24 3.5 Spatial Syntax 25 3.6 Scale 26 3.7 Materials 27 3.8 Landscape 28 3.9 Streetscenes 30 3.10 Visualisations 32 3 4 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction This Design and Access Statement has been prepared by IDPartnership on behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes Southampton to accompany a detailed planning submission for a residential development on land at Highgrove Farm, Bosham, Chichester.
    [Show full text]
  • Admirals Wood Sarisbury Green a New Home
    Admirals Wood Sarisbury Green A new home. The start of a whole new chapter for you and your family. And for us, the part of our job where bricks and mortar becomes a place filled with activity and dreams and fun and love. We put a huge amount of care into the houses we build, but the story’s not finished until we match them up with the right people. So, once you’ve chosen a Miller home, we’ll do everything we can to make the rest of the process easy, even enjoyable. From the moment you make your decision until you’ve settled happily in, we’ll be there to help. 01 Welcome home 02 Living in Sarisbury Green 06 Floor plans 14 Specification 20 How to find us Plot information Plot information Ballard See Page 06 Blyton See Page 07 Aldrich See Page 08 Thames See Page 09 Montgomery See Page 10 The Admiral See Page 12 The artist’s impressions (computer-generated graphics) have been prepared for illustrative purposes and are indicative only. They do not form part of any contract, or constitute a representation or warranty. External appearance may be subject to variation upon completion of the project. Please note that the site plan is not drawn to scale. N Welcome to Admirals Wood Set in spacious and beautifully landscaped grounds in Sarisbury Green, a delightful suburb with a strong sense of community and a welcoming, village-like ambience, Admirals Wood is an exciting modern neighbourhood that combines strong eco-friendly and sustainable housing design with wonderful natural surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden House, Burridge, Hampshire
    Garden House, Burridge, Hampshire A magical waterfront haven in which a fabulous country house can be created. Unique unobstructed views of the famous River Hamble, within some fifteen and a half acres of glorious gardens, paddocks and wild flower meadows, and about 300 metres of private river frontage, this immaculate family house has the benefit of planning permission to almost double the property in size. Featu res - Existing House • Entrance Vestibule • Dining Hall • Drawing Room • Kitchen/Breakfast Room • Utility Room • Cloakroom • Boot Room • 4 Double Bedrooms • Master En Suite With River Views and Juliet Balconies • Family Bathroom • Four Car Double Garage • Self-Contained Apartment Over • Heated Swimming Pool and Pump House • Outbuildings • Formal Gardens • Paddocks, Large Pond, Wild Flower Meadow • In all about 15.473 Acres (6.262 ha) Planning Permission has been granted to enlarge the house by 1883 sq ft (175 sq m) thus enlarging the house in total to 4198 sq ft (390 sq m) Location The village of Burridge is situated in south Hampshire on the A3051 Botley to Swanwick/Park Gate Road. Garden House lies in the most magical setting at the end of a “No- Though” lane and is one of the only houses that have a totally uninterrupted view of the upper reaches of the River Hamble. There are long views from the property across to Manor Farm Country Park and tranquil ancient woodland on the opposite bank. The setting is completely private but is not isolated. Whiteley Shopping Village is only a mile and half away, where there are The Apartment numerous shops, restaurants, cafes, doctors’ surgery and cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Annual Review 2018
    2018 Annual Review WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP connecting communities with places and opportunities SUSSEX COMMUNITY RAIL PARTNERSHIP CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION SCRP IN 2018 Welcome to our Review of 2018 Partnership structure 2018 has been an incredibly busy year for the Sussex Sussex Community Rail Partnership (SCRP) was formed Community Rail Partnership (SCRP), now in its 10th year in 2002 and has operated as a not for profi t Limited as a Limited Company. Company since 2008. SCRP is managed by volunteer A new community line was launched between Hove and directors, who provide local, independent expertise. We Angmering and the North Downs Line was extended to employ eight staff who coordinate project work within Reading. 18 new station partnerships were formed with local their community area. community support. Go-Learn reached over 3,200 children and Active Access We work in partnership with train operators, Network Rail, community groups, supported over 70 young people. The SCRP worked closely with partners to local authorities and local businesses, helping them to achieve their objectives. deliver World War 1 commemorations at 16 stations and launched a new suite SCRP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board meets twice a year and represents an of Line Guides and promotional videos. opportunity to update members on developments, to seek guidance on future The SCRP works with many partners to deliver projects, including individuals, strategy and to hear guest speakers from the rail industry. community groups, businesses, Network Rail and local authorities. We are SCRP now has seven Community Rail Lines, and each has a Development grateful for the support we receive from Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Offi cer who arranges four steering group meetings a year to monitor progress Great Western Railway (GWR) and our stakeholders who provide advice and on the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwhiteley Design and Access Statement
    JGP Lakedale NorthWhiteley Design and Access Statement 19 December 2014 FOREWORD THE NORTH WHITELEY CONSORTIUM THIS DOCUMENT Policy SH3 of Winchester City Council’s adopted The development is being promoted by a The approach taken in this document is to lead Joint Core Strategy (March 2013) identifies Consortium of developers and a landowner, the reader through the logical sequence of a site measuring over 200ha for residential comprising Bovis Homes, Taylor Wimpey, Crest context review and master plan evolution that the development of ‘about 3,500’ dwellings, with Nicholson and the Bunney family. Collectively design team followed to arrive at the parameters supporting uses and services, to the north of the they control all of the land within the proposed and illustrative master plan as set out here and existing settlement of Whiteley. application boundary. They have considerable within the wider application documents. experience in delivering large-scale housing This Design and Access Statement accompanies developments with associated services and a suite of documents that collectively make up infrastructure. the outline planning application for the North Whiteley urban extension. It seeks to explain Together with their consultant team, which the design thinking behind the application and includes Terence O’Rourke and Peter Brett suggested parameters, as well as illustrating how Associates, the Consortium has sought to these could be interpreted within a master plan. devise a robust and appropriate master plan which recognises the existing context along with local aspirations, whilst reflecting current design thinking. © Terence O’Rourke Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or stored in a retrieval system without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex CMSP Module 2: Market Study / Meeting Policy Objectives James Hodgson, Economic Planner Contents
    System Operator Planning a better network for you West Sussex CMSP Module 2: Market Study / Meeting Policy Objectives James Hodgson, Economic Planner Contents Scheme objectives DfT Transport for the South East Network Rail Others Next steps Scheme objectives are vital • Number 1 cause of failure: Lack of clear link to the organisation’s key strategic priorities What is the traditional role of a market study? Find ways to meet Define Conditional Market Study conditional outputs in outputs route study Meet the capacity London & South East Lengthen trains and requirements for trains Market Study (2013) extend platforms into XXXX in 2043 Linespeed Examples Deliver a minimum improvements; generalised speed to alternative routes to locations destinations Conditional outputs are derived primarily from funders’ objectives L&SE Market Study (2013:p22) This Market Study identifies the long term role of the London and South East passenger market in enabling the key priorities of current and potential future funders to be met. These statements of priorities are the strategic goals that the London and South East rail market should aim to meet in the long term. Strategic goals are identified based on the aspirations of current and likely future rail industry funders. They are also developed through collaboration with industry partners and stakeholders and a review of existing literature. Conditional outputs are developed to meet these identified strategic goals.” What have we previously researched about this market? Shorter distance journeys within the South East (L&SE Market Study, 2013:p52) • The research indicates that, in contrast to the London markets, the largest benefits are generated here for quality of life and environmental impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways at Lewes, by Robert Cheesman Introduction
    Railways at Lewes, by Robert Cheesman Introduction This article came about as a result of a request from a member of Friends of Lewes after one of our talks in January, 2017. Two managers from the BAM-Nuttall team who had completed a year-long renovation of the station’s listed buildings came to describe the challenges they had faced and this was preceded by a short history of railways in the town by Robert Cheesman, Chairman of the Friends of Lewes. Afterwards it was suggested that it would be interesting to have a more detailed account. A.H. Homewood postcard of Lewes Station c. 1905, John Hollands collection * 1 Description of the lines Image © Railway Magazine * After some speculative schemes had been put forward, the first railway from Brighton opened on 8 June 1846, having bisected the Priory Remains to reach Lewes. The station was in Friars Walk and had an ornate Italianate frontage on to the street. This station survived until it was demolished without permission over the Easter weekend in 1969. Friars Walk frontage of the original Lewes station * 2 On 27 June 1846 services were extended to St Leonards (Bulverhythe), but this meant that services from Brighton to St Leonards had to reverse out of Lewes station as it was a terminus. The following year (1847) the London line from Keymer Junction, which tunnelled for some 370 yards under the castle precinct, and the branch line to Newhaven opened. Many of these trains used the station in Friars Walk, although to make operating easier platforms were provided at Pinwell (from 1847) so that some through trains could stop in Lewes without having to reverse out of the station.
    [Show full text]
  • Fareham Sarisbury County Election Address
    CONSERVATIVES COUNTY ELECTION SPECIAL InTouch FAREHAM SARISBURY DIVISION We alone have got the priorities right Conservatives put the elderly at top of the social care list SOCIAL CARE for Hampshire’s elderly is in the safest hands – the CONSERVATIVE County Council. The proof lies in the financial facts. This year, social care costs will increase by £21 million, so we had to make a bold decision to increase council tax by 4.99% to ensure our old folk are properly looked after. That was the maximum allowed without a referendum and that was what we did at the February budget meeting. So where did the other parties stand on this vital issue? Labour: Proposed a 3.99% increase which would have produced a shortfall of £5.3 million. Liberal Democrats: Voted against the budget, but as usu- al offered no alternatives as to how it could be funded. of us might wake up one day needing it. County Councillor Seán Woodward commented: “I don’t “Yes, the CONSERVATIVES REALLY DO like paying extra council tax any more than anybody else, CARE.” but I could not face the electorate unless everything had PHOTO: Seán visits Sylvan Court, Saris- been done to protect the elderly in need of social care. bury Green which provides 36 apartments “No one in Hampshire is getting any younger and any one for older people needing support and cost £5 million. WHAT CONSERVATIVES HAVE DONE WHAT CONSERVATIVES PLAN TO DO •Kept council tax low for a decade •Upgrade M27 Junctions 9 and 10 •£100m Fareham road improvement package •Extend Whiteley Way to north of Curbridge •Dualing
    [Show full text]
  • West Meon, Beacon Hill and Exton
    point your feet on a new path West Meon, Beacon Hill and Exton Distance: 13½ km=8½ miles easy walking Region: Hampshire Date written: 31-jul-2015 Author: Botafuego Last update: 1-jun-2021 Refreshments: West Meon, Warnford, Exton Map: Explorer 132 (Winchester) but the maps in this guide should be sufficient Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. Villages, hills, views, woodland, dismantled railway In Brief This walk goes through Hampshire's best village (as voted once in The Times ) and you won’t argue. This is an area of prehistory, with the great bronze-age barrows of Beacon Hill, visited on the way, with high views of Old Winchester Hill and the Solent. Part of the route is along the dismantled Meon Valley Railway, giving you a very comfortable stretch. In fact, the entire walk is easy on the feet and it may seem shorter than the given distance. You will be walking in a region full of foodie pubs in choice locations. Booking may be necessary. For the Thomas Lord in West Meon, ring 01730-829244. For the Shoe in Exton, ring 01489-877526. This walk can be zipped up with the Beacon Hill, Betty Mundy's Wood, Exton walk giving you a 19 km=12 mile Big Zipper walk. Zip points are indicated in the guides. Omit Leg 1 on this walk and omit Leg 3 on the other walk.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN WSTP4 Sustainability Appraisal
    West Sussex County Council LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN WSTP4 Sustainability Appraisal 70076288 JULY 2021 PUBLIC West Sussex County Council LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN WSTP4 Sustainability Appraisal TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70076288 OUR REF. NO. 70076288 DATE: JULY 2021 WSP 2 London Square Cross Lanes Guildford, Surrey GU1 1UN Phone: +44 148 352 8400 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Working Draft for V01 Draft V02 following client client comment comment and Natural England Scoping comments Date May 2021 June 2021 05/07/2021 Prepared by Jerome Kreule Jerome Kreule Jerome Kreule Signature Checked by Jo North Jo North Ursula Stevenson Signature Authorised by Ursula Stevenson Ursula Stevenson Jo North Signature Project number 70076288 70076288 70076288 Report number Working Draft 1 V02 V03 File reference 01 Draft Final Draft LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70076288 | Our Ref No.: 70076288 July 2021 West Sussex County Council CONTENTS NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL 1 1.3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 2 THE WEST SUSSEX TRANSPORT PLAN 2 2.1 BACKGROUND 2 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE NEW WSTP 2 WSTP OVERARCHING STRATEGIES 4 2.3 WSTP OBJECTIVES 5 2.4 STRUCTURE OF THE SA 6 2.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEA AND WSTP 8 3 SA METHODOLOGY 11 3.1 INTRODUCTION 11 3.2 STAGE A: SCOPING 11 3.3 STAGE B: ASSESSING EFFECTS 11 3.4 STAGE C AND D: REPORTING AND CONSULTATION 12 3.5 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES 16 3.6 CONSIDERATION
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Fareham 5.1 About Fareham the Borough of Fareham Is a Coastal
    5. Fareham 5.1 About Fareham The Borough of Fareham is a coastal, mainly urban district lying between the cities of Southampton and Portsmouth. The largest settlements are Fareham town, Portchester, Locks Heath and Stubbington, with a large new development planned at Welborne, north of Fareham town. The district also includes Titchfield Haven, a well-known nature reserve and the point where the River Meon flows out to the Solent. Fareham borders the River Hamble to the west, Winchester district to the north and Gosport to the south and has a short boundary with Portsmouth to the east. The district is unparished. The principal road corridors through Fareham are the east-west M27, the parallel A27 further south and the A32, which runs north to Alton and south to Gosport. Fareham is the sole through-route for commuting into/out of Gosport, which together with high traffic flows along the motorway mean that routes through Fareham can be congested. There are local rail connections to Eastleigh, Southampton, Portsmouth and Brighton. Fareham has strong economic links with Portsmouth and many people who work in Portsmouth live in Fareham. The Solent Enterprise Zone at the former naval airfield HMS Daedalus lies mainly within Fareham. This is a significant commercial development which is expected to bring 3,500 jobs into the borough by 2025. The population of Fareham in 2015 is around 114,000. Development in Fareham in recent times has been spread all over the borough. Stubbington grew substantially after the Second World War but elsewhere in the borough the environmental constraints around Titchfield, the various water boundaries and the nature of the Gosport peninsula have meant that development has been slower than in many other parts of the county.
    [Show full text]