DOCSLIB.ORG

Indications and Treatment of Myofascial Pain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indications and Treatment of Myofascial Pain 2/25/2017 Indications and Treatment of Myofascial Pain Lisa DeStefano, DO Associate Professor and Chair Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University Common Myofascial Pain Syndromes 1 2/25/2017 2 2/25/2017 Greater Occipital Nerve Impingement Sites . 1: Origin of the third occipital nerve and proximal connection with the greater occipital nerve. 2: Greater occipital nerve as it courses inferior to the inferior oblique muscle. 3: Greater occipital nerve coursing through the semispinalis capitis muscle. 4: Greater occipital nerve exiting the aponeurosis of the trapezius muscle. 5: Greater occipital nerve traveling with the occipital artery. 6: Origin of the greater occipital nerve and relationship to the descending branch of the occipital artery. 7: Suboccipital nerve relation to the vertebral artery and the descending branch of the occipital artery and this nerves interconnection to the greater occipital nerve. 8: Relationship between the third occipital nerve and the C2‐C3 joint complex. Common Treatment Approaches • MFR • MET • Soft Tissue Release • Counterstain • HVLA Etiology of Head and Neck Myofascial Pain Syndromes • Overuse • Posture –Head over the pelvis • Posture – Scapular function • Occlusion –how the teeth control for the proper placement of the mandibular condyle. 3 2/25/2017 Stabilization of the torsobegins with spinotransverse muscle transmission of force onto the epaxial fascia or vertebral aponeurosis. 4 2/25/2017 This then transmits tension into the serratus posterior superior and inferior, which then lifts the upper four ribs and sternum and lowers the lower ribs respectively. In response a force‐ couple is generated between the serratus posterior inferior fascia, external oblique fascia, and the rectus sheath. This load then reconnects to the upward moment of the sternum. 5 2/25/2017 Evaluation and Observation 6 2/25/2017 7 2/25/2017 8 2/25/2017 Rational Treatment Approach 1. Optimize lumbopelvic stability 2. Optimize thorax stability on the pelvis 3. Optimize cervical stability on the thorax 4. Optimize cranial stability on the cervical spine 9 2/25/2017 For thorax stability, lower thoracic lordosis is imperative. • The deeper layers of the thoracolumbar fascia, which mechanically links the thorax and the lumbopelvic regions, support extension moments of the thoracolumbar junction thus allowing stable transfer of loads between the lumbopelvic region and the thorax. • In addition, extension of the lower thoracic spine allows for stiffness of the rib cage such that lateral bending forces are countered. Thoracic stability –below the kyphotic apex • Treatment is often focused at the lower thoracic and upper lumbar regions to assure segmental lordosis. • Balanced lordosis at the thoracolumbar region has been shown to contribute to the activity of the deep and superficial multifidus and internal oblique muscles which then contributes to the tension throughout the vertebral aponeurosis. Thoracic stability –below the kyphotic apex • Superior tension in this fascial system contributes proprioceptive feed forward neural input to the lower trapezius musculature. • Manipulation at and above the apex of the thoracic kyphosis again optimizes the passive transfer system, in particular for loads that are derived from the upper extremity and cervical spine. 10 2/25/2017 Lower Thoracic INR • Once the segment of dysfunction (FRS) is localized contact the transverse process of the segment using the thenar eminence and/or scaphoid of both hands. • Move the hands slowly to move the vertebral unit towards the “feather edge” of its planes of restriction. • From this position ask the patient to slowly and gently press one leg into the table as you monitor for an internal load that matches the load that your hands have generated. • Wait and monitor for release. 11 2/25/2017 Lower Thoracic INR • Pt. seated on their heels 1‐2 feet from a stool or bench, elbows together and resting on the stool or bench, hands clasped and chin resting on forearms, as if praying. • Operator stands straddling patients legs from posterior, and springs along the patients’ 7th‐12th transverse process’ bilaterally seeking for restriction. • Once the restricted segment is determined, a posterior to anterior fascial release is imposed over the restricted segment. • INR is utilized by asking the patient to use their abdominal muscle to balance your forces by pulling their umbilicus inwards, with breathing; paying careful attention that the patient does not change the position of their spine. • Wait for a release. Thoracic Stability –above the kyphotic apex • Reversal of the upper thoracic kyphosis is common in scapular dyskinesis, and suggests loss of passive tension above the apex of the kyphosis. • This tension system stabilizes the upper thorax, cervicothoracic junction, and upper rib cage in preparation for upper extremity load; when it then employs a force couple with the rhomboids, serratus anterior, external oblique, abdominal musculature and fasciae across the body to the contralateral ilia. 12 2/25/2017 Cervical Stability • Thoracic kyphosis also is accompanied by scapular dyskinesis with subsequent facilitation of the levator scapulae and upper trapezius musculature placing detrimental load onto the cervical spine. Thorax stability is imperative for cervical dynamic stability. • The posterior cervical muscles to be countered by the deep cervical flexors creating a stable yet mobile column on which the cranium is supported. • An increase in thoracic kyphosis is generally accompanied by an increase in the cervical lordosis, a decrease in the deep cervical flexor muscle tone and facilitation and pain in the anterior cervical musculature. Cervical Thoracic Junction . Thumbs on the anterior surface of C6 . Fingers posteriorly along and on the spinous process of C7, posterior first rib and transverse process of T1‐2. Ask the pt. to bite their teeth together. Monitor for muscle facilitation. 13 2/25/2017 Cervico‐Trigeminal Reflex • Contact the costovertebral joint of T3 bilaterally. • While watching your thumbs, ask your patient to bite their teeth together. • Watch for rotation and extension of the segment. 14 2/25/2017 CT Junction INR • Thumbs on the lateral body of C6. • Fingers posteriorly along and on the spinous process of C7, posterior first rib and transverse process of T1‐2. • Using both hands position the CT junction just into the feather edge of its restrictive barrier, in multiple planes. • Ask the patient to pull the back of their tongue posteriorly (facilitating the deep cervical flexors to match the load that you have generated with your hands), and breath easy. • Wait for release. Seated Posture • Patient seated, feet flat on the floor. • Instruct patient to roll their pelvis forward until the weight of their body is onto their ischial tuberosity’s or “butt bones” or “sit bones” and to relax their “butt muscles” and back muscles. Seated Posture • From this position instruct the patient to fire their transversus abdominus and external oblique muscles. The external oblique’s fire with terminal exhalation. • From this position, instruct the patient to breathe by expanding their lower rib cage, rather than by pushing out their lower abdomen. 15 2/25/2017 Seated Posture • From this position and while breathing, start from L5 and instruct the patient to toggle each of the five lumbar segments and the lower four thoracic segments forward slightly, ultimately placing the thorax over the pelvis. Seated Posture • From this position instruct the patient to relax their shoulders and scapula onto the thorax. • Finally, from this position, instruct the patient to move the 4th cervical segment, or apex of the cervical lordosis, posteriorly without tilting their head downward…. and breathe. Home Stretches • Latissimus Dorsi • Scalenes • Sternocleidomastoid • Levator Scapulae • Pectoralis 16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Strengthening in Mechanical Low Back Pain
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 ResearchGate Impact Factor (2018): 0.28 | SJIF (2019): 7.583 Effect of Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Strengthening in Mechanical Low Back Pain 1 2 Vishakha Vishwakarma , Dr. P. R. Suresh 1, 2PCPS & RC, People’s University, Bhopal (M.P.), India Abstract: Mechanical low back pain (MLBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal pain syndromes, affecting up to 80% of people at some point during their lifetime. Sources of back pain are numerous, usually sought in as lesion of disc or facet joints at L4- L5 and L5-S1 levels. Studies have shown that 40% of all back pain is of thoracolumbar origin. The term meachnical low back pain also gives reassurance that there is no damage to the nerves or spinal pathology. The clinical presentation of mechanical low back pain usually the ages 18-55 years is in the lumbo sacral region. A study was conducted to evaluate the designed to check the effectiveness of Conventional Exercises alone in Mechanical low back pain and along with the latissimus dorsi muscle strengthening, data was collected from People’s hospital, Bhopal (age group-30-45 yr both male and female randomly) Keywords: Visual analog scale, Assessment chart, Treatment table, Data collection sheets, Essential stationery materials, Computer, SPSS Software etc. 1. Introduction Back pain is a primary to seek medical advice considering 80% of people suffering from back pain. Mechanical low back pain is defined as a result of minor intervertebral dysfunction and referred pain in the low back The latissimus dorsi is a large, flat muscle on the back that and hip region, and can often be confused with the other stretches to the sides, behind the arm, and is partly covered pathologies that may cause these symptoms.18 by the trapezius on the back near the midline, the word latissimus dorsi comes from Latin and its means, broadest muscle of the back dorsum means back.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumbar Muscle Function and Dysfunction in Low Back Pain - Markku Kankaanpää
    PHYSIOLOGY AND MAINTENANCE – Vol. IV - Lumbar Muscle Function and Dysfunction in Low Back Pain - Markku Kankaanpää LUMBAR MUSCLE FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION IN LOW BACK PAIN Markku Kankaanpää Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kuopio University Hospital, and Department of Physiology, University of Kuopio, Finland Keywords: Low back pain, trunk muscles, muscle coordination, dysfunction, biomechanics, deconditioning syndrome. Contents 1. Anatomy and Function of the Trunk Extensor and Flexor Muscles 1.1. Functional Properties of Lumbar Spine 1.2. Anatomy of Lumbar and Abdominal Muscles 1.3. Control Properties of Lumbar and Abdominal Muscles 2. Epidemiological Aspects of LBP 2.1. Physical Risk Factors of LBP 3. Structural and Pathophysiological Aspects in LBP 4. Lumbar Muscle Dysfunction in LBP 4.1. Loss of Strength 4.2. Excessive Lumbar Muscle Fatigue 4.3. Loss of Co-ordination and Muscle Control 4.4. Active Rehabilitation and Back Extensor Muscle Functional Assessment Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Low back pain is one of the most common health problems. The reason for back pain is most often unknown. Some of the models that help in explaining the origin of low back pain are introduced. The lumbar structure and muscle functions and dysfunctions in relation to low back pain are reviewed. Complex central and peripheral elements control the biomechanics of the lumbar spine and ensure optimal spinal loading in normal everyday life situations.UNESCO Low back pain leads to acute – and EOLSS chronic changes in paraspinal muscles and their control mechanisms. Acute changes are observed as impaired reflexive functions of paraspinal muscles. Pain in spinal structures results from reflexive activities that protect the spine from excessiveSAMPLE and harmful loading.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Function of the Equine Thoracolumbar Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
    Aus dem Veterinärwissenschaftlichen Department der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Lehrstuhl für Anatomie, Histologie und Embryologie Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Dr. Fred Sinowatz Arbeit angefertigt unter der Leitung von Dr. Renate Weller, PhD, MRCVS The Anatomy and Function of the equine thoracolumbar Longissimus dorsi muscle Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der tiermedizinischen Doktorwürde der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Vorgelegt von Christina Carla Annette von Scheven aus Düsseldorf München 2010 2 Gedruckt mit der Genehmigung der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Joachim Braun Berichterstatter: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Johann Maierl Korreferentin: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Bettina Wollanke Tag der Promotion: 24. Juli 2010 3 Für meine Familie 4 Table of Contents I. Introduction................................................................................................................ 8 II. Literature review...................................................................................................... 10 II.1 Macroscopic anatomy ............................................................................................. 10 II.1.1 Comparative evolution of the body axis ............................................................ 10 II.1.2 Axis of the equine body ..................................................................................... 12 II.1.2.1 Vertebral column of the horse....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quadratus Lumborum Blocks
    REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA Tutorial433 Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Ro´ isı´ n Nee†1, John McDonnell2 1Regional Fellow, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland 2Consultant Anaesthetist, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland Edited by: Dr. Su Cheen Ng, University College Hospital London, UK Dr. Gillian Foxall, Consultant Anaesthetist, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK †Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Published 29 September 2020 KEY POINTS Quadratus lumborum blocks (QLB) are a variation on transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks. Four different approaches to ultrasound-guided QLB have been described. QLB can be used to provide adjuvant analgesia for abdominal, orthopaedic, gynaecological and urological surgery. They can be performed in the lateral or supine position with a wedge under the patient’s hip. The shamrock sign of the psoas, erector spinae and the quadratus lumborum muscles around the transverse process on ultrasound allows identification of the needle insertion point. INTRODUCTION Dr. Rafa Blanco first described quadratus lumborum blocks (QLBs) in 20071 as a ‘‘no pops’’ transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. It has been proposed as a more consistent method of accomplishing somatic as well as visceral analgesia of the abdomen than the TAP block and may provide an extended sensory blockade between T4 and L1. It can be used as an adjuvant technique for analgesia but does not provide adequate blockade to be used for anaesthesia. The QLB was developed to address the fact that as ultrasound imaging for regional anaesthesia has become more widespread, the tendency has been to move the injection point of the TAP block more anterior on the abdominal wall as compared with the original landmark technique, which is at the Triangle of Petit.
    [Show full text]
  • Diastasis Recti Abdominus Association Spring Conference 2018
    Diagnosis and treatment of DRA. 4/13/18 MPTA Spring Conference 2018. Kansas City Jennifer Cumming, PT, MSPT, Diagnosis and treatment of CLT, WCS Missouri Physical Therapy No disclosures Diastasis Recti Abdominus Association Spring Conference 2018 Objective Case study #1 complaints 1. Understand anatomy of abdominal wall and deep motor control • Mrs. H is 37 year old who is 6 months post-partum system • Back pain since late pregnancy and postpartum period. 2. Understand the causes and prevalence of diastasis rectus • Pain not responding to traditional physical therapy abdominus (DRA) • Pain with transition movements and bending 3. Understand how to assess for DRA • Also c/o stress urinary incontinence and pain with intercourse 4. Understand basic treatment strategies for improving functionality of abdominal wall and deep motor control system Case study #1 orthopedic assessment Case study #2 complaints • 1 ½ finger diastasis rectus abdominus just inferior to umbilicus • Ms. S is a 20 year old elite college level athlete • Active straight leg raise (ASLR) with best correction at PSIS indicating • History of DRA developing with high level athletic training involvement of posterior deep motor control system • Complains of LBP with prolonged sitting, bending, and lifting activities • L3 right rotation at level of DRA • Hypertonicity B internal oblique muscles Property of J Cumming, PT, MSPT, CLT, WCS. Do not copy without permission. 1 Diagnosis and treatment of DRA. 4/13/18 MPTA Spring Conference 2018. Kansas City Case study #2 orthopedic assessment
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Pathophysiology of the CORE
    Robert A. Donatelli The Anatomy and Pathophysiology of the CORE LEARNING OBJECTIVES design a rehabilitation program to promote an increase in After studying this lesson, the reader will be able to do the strength, power, and endurance specific to the muscles and following: joints that are in a state of dysfunction. Specificity of the reha- 1. Define the hip and trunk CORE bilitation program can help the athlete overcome muscu- 2. Evaluate the CORE muscles and structure loskeletal system deficits and achieve maximum potentials of 3. Delineate the difference between local and global muscles his or her talents. A combination of power, strength, and on the back endurance is critical for the muscles of the CORE to allow the 4. Identify the muscles of the abdominal area that are con- athlete to perform at his or her maximum capabilities. sidered stabilizing The lower quadrant CORE is identified by the muscles, 5. Identify the spinal muscles that stiffen the spine ligaments, and fascia that produce a synchronous motion and 6. Evaluate the CORE dysfunction stability of the trunk, hip, and lower extremities. The initia- 7. Instruct patients in exercises designed to strength hip and tion of movement in the lower limb is a result of activation of trunk muscles certain muscles that hold onto bone, referred to as stabilizers, 8. Identify the correlation between muscle weakness in the and other muscles that move bone, referred to as mobilizers. The hip and lower extremity injuries muscle action within the CORE depends on a balanced activity of the stabilizers and mobilizers. If the stabilizers do not hold onto the bone, the mobilizing muscles will function at a dis- INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITION advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thoracolumbar Fascia: Anatomy, Function and Clinical Considerations F
    Journal of Anatomy J. Anat. (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x REVIEW The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations F. H. Willard,1 A. Vleeming,1,2 M. D. Schuenke,1 L. Danneels2 and R. Schleip3 1Department of Anatomy, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, ME, USA 2Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium 3Fascia Research Group, Division of Neurophysiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Abstract In this overview, new and existent material on the organization and composition of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) will be evaluated in respect to its anatomy, innervation biomechanics and clinical relevance. The integration of the passive connective tissues of the TLF and active muscular structures surrounding this structure are discussed, and the relevance of their mutual interactions in relation to low back and pelvic pain reviewed. The TLF is a girdling structure consisting of several aponeurotic and fascial layers that separates the paraspinal muscles from the muscles of the posterior abdominal wall. The superficial lamina of the posterior layer of the TLF (PLF) is domi- nated by the aponeuroses of the latissimus dorsi and the serratus posterior inferior. The deeper lamina of the PLF forms an encapsulating retinacular sheath around the paraspinal muscles. The middle layer of the TLF (MLF) appears to derive from an intermuscular septum that developmentally separates the epaxial from the hypaxial musculature. This septum forms during the fifth and sixth weeks of gestation. The paraspinal retinacular sheath (PRS) is in a key position to act as a ‘hydraulic amplifier’, assisting the paraspinal muscles in supporting the lumbo- sacral spine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomical “Core”: a Definition and Functional Classification
    Osteopathic Family Physician (2011) 3, 239-245 The anatomical “core”: a definition and functional classification John J. Dougherty, DO, FACOFP, FAOASM From the Department of Family Medicine, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO. KEYWORDS: The anatomic core is important in the functional stabilization of the body during static and dynamic Core; movement. This functional stabilization is an integral component of proprioception, balance perfor- Static function; mance, and compensatory postural activation of the trunk muscles. The structures that define the core Dynamic function; and its functions are presented here. By understanding the contributing components and responsibilities Sensory-motor control of the core, it is hoped that the physician will have a better understanding of core function as it relates to the performance of their patients’ activities of daily living. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Core training has found its way into the lexicon of functional unit, synergistically adjusting the entire body to countless exercise regimens. However, clinically there has maintain balance, postural stabilization, and mobility. These been little comprehensive definition and even less practical abilities are essential in the performance of basic activities characterization of this “core.” The word core derives from of daily living (ADLs).7 the Greek word kormos, which loosely translates to “trunk Neurologic and musculoskeletal impairments can alter of a tree.” An additional word origin comes from the Span- these normal biomechanical relationships.8-10 Such impair- ish word for heart, corazon. George Lucas selected “Cora- ment effects a functional shift of the structural burden to the zon” as the name for the planet at the center of his “Star components of the core.1 The resultant alterations impose Wars” universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Muscle Table Proximal Attachment Distal Attachment Muscle Innervation Main Actions Blood Supply Muscle Group (Origin) (Insertion)
    Robert Frysztak, PhD. Structure of the Human Body Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine BACK MUSCLE TABLE PROXIMAL ATTACHMENT DISTAL ATTACHMENT MUSCLE INNERVATION MAIN ACTIONS BLOOD SUPPLY MUSCLE GROUP (ORIGIN) (INSERTION) Serratus posterior inferior Spinous processes of T11–L2 Inferior aspect of ribs 9–12 Ventral rami of lower thoracic nerves Depresses ribs Posterior intercostal arteries Intermediate back Ligamentum nuchae, spinous Serratus posterior superior Superior aspect of ribs 2–4 Ventral rami of upper thoracic nerves Elevates ribs Posterior intercostal arteries Intermediate back processes of C7–T3 Iliocostalis : angles of lower ribs, Cervical portions: occipital, deep cervical transverse processes cervical, and vertebral arteries Posterior sacrum, iliac crest, Longissimus: between tubercles and Thoracic portions: dorsal branches sacrospinous ligament, supraspinous angles of ribs, transverse processes Extends and laterally bends vertebral Erector spinae Dorsal rami of each region of posterior intercostal, subcostal, Sacrospinalis ligament, spinous processes of lower of thoracic and cervical vertebrae, column and head and lumbar arteries lumbar and sacral vertebrae mastoid process Sacral portions: dorsal branches of Spinalis: spinous processes of upper lateral sacral arteries thoracic and midcervical vertebrae Cervical portions: occipital, deep cervical, and vertebral arteries Interspinales (cervical, thoracic, Thoracic portions: dorsal branches Spinous process Adjacent spinous process Dorsal rami of spinal nerves
    [Show full text]
  • Autochtonous Intrinsic Muscles of the Back
    Autochtonous back muscles This short overview gives a simplified description how the deep back muscles are structured. It summarises the most important knowledge (minimum requirement) about the autochtonous back muscles. To understand the sometimes subtle differences in their functions, please, consult your textbook. The erector spinae muscle expands in a longitudinal groove formed by the spinous processes of the vertebrae and the angles of the ribs, ensheathed by the thoracolumbar fascia. The bulk of the muscle fibres arise from the posterior part of the iliac crest together with the medial sacral crest. The erector spinae can be subdivided into the following parts: 1. Medial Part a) transversopinalis In the thoracic part, the muscle extends cranially and medially as semispinalis thoracis. Further cranially, now as semispinalis cervicis, the muscle inserts on the spinous process of C2. The most cranial part, semispinalis capitis, ascends along the midline to reach the nape. Deeper, we can identify the multifidi which span over 3-4 vertebrae. The deepest muscles are called rotators, they pass nearly horizontally to span over a single vertebra. 2. Lateral Part a) The spinotransversal muscles (splenius) arise on the spinous processes and ascend in cranial direction. The splenius cervicis and the splenius capitis reach the transverse processes of the upper cervical vertebrae and the occipital bone, respectively. b) Further lateral we find the longissimus muscles. Its caudal parts, the longissimus thoracis and cervicis, insert on the costal angles and the transverse processes of the vertebrae. The cranial part, longissimus capitis, inserts on the mastoid process. c) The iliocostalis lumborum, thoracis & cervicis expand most laterally, they insert on the costal angles and the transverse processes of the lower cervical vertebrae.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoracolumbar Fascia Enthesopathy As a Cause of Low Back Pain: a Retrospective and Follow-Up Study
    Fortune J Rheumatol 2021; 3 (3): 41-52 DOI: 10.26502/fjr.26880027 Research Article Thoracolumbar Fascia Enthesopathy as a Cause of Low Back Pain: A Retrospective and Follow-up Study Ouidade A Tabesh1, Roba Ghossan2, Soha H Zebouni3, Rafic Faddoul4, Michel Revel5, Fouad Fayad6 ⃰ 1Department of Rheumatology, Bellevue Medical Center, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. 2Department of Rheumatology, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. 3Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. 4Higher School of Engineers of Beirut and Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. 5Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France. 6Department of Rheumatology, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. *Corresponding Author: Dr. F Fayad, Department of Rheumatology, Hotel Dieu De France Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Alfred Naccache Street, Achrafieh, Beirut, P.O. Box 166830-Lebanon. Received: 03 July 2021; Accepted: 12 July 2021; Published: 15 August 2021 Citation: Ouidade A Tabesh, Roba Ghossan, Soha H Zebouni, Rafic Faddoul, Michel Revel, Fouad Fayad. Thoracolumbar Fascia Enthesopathy as a Cause of Low Back Pain: A Retrospective and Follow-up Study. Fortune Journal of Rheumatology 3 (2021): 41-52. Abstract of the TLF was measured with ultrasound (US) at its Aim: To evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of insertion on the iliac crest. Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) enthesis in patients with low back pain (LBP) due to iliac crest pain syndrome Results: Forty-eight women and 12 men with a mean (ICPS). age of 42.1 ± 11.3 years were diagnosed with ICPS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Lumbocostal Ligament: Anatomical Study with Application to Thoracolumbar Surgery
    Open Access Original Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.925 The Forgotten Lumbocostal Ligament: Anatomical Study with Application to Thoracolumbar Surgery Erfanul Saker 1 , Gabrielle G. Tardieu 2 , Fernando Alonso 3 , Beom Sun Chung 4 , Christian Fisahn 5 , Marios Loukas 6 , Rod J. Oskouian 7 , R. Shane Tubbs 8 1. Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Elmhurst), New York, New York, Elmhurst, USA 2. Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Amarillo 3. Neurosurgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Medical Center 4. Department of Anatomy, Ajou University School of Medicine 5. Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, USA 6. Anatomy, St. George's University, St. George's, GRD 7. Neurosurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, USA 8. Neurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, USA Corresponding author: Erfanul Saker, [email protected] Disclosures can be found in Additional Information at the end of the article Abstract Introduction: Most ligaments of the human body have been well studied. However, the lumbocostal ligament has received little attention in the extant medical literature and, to our knowledge, has not undergone anatomical study. Therefore, the present study was performed to better characterize this structure’s anatomy and relationships. Methods: In the prone position, 10 adult cadavers underwent dissection of their lumbocostal ligaments. All specimens were unembalmed and had no history of surgery to the spine. The lumbocostal ligament was dissected and measurements made using calipers and a ruler. This ligament’s attachments were determined as well as its relationships to surrounding fasciae, muscle, and nerves. Results: A lumbocostal ligament was identified on all sides.
    [Show full text]