An Anthology of Philosophical Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Anthology of Philosophical Studies Introduction AN ANTHOLOGY OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Edited by PATRICIA HANNA ADRIANNE L. MCEVOY PENELOPE VOUTSINA ATINER 2006 1 An Anthology of Philosophical Studies 2 Introduction Athens Institute for Education and Research 2006 An Anthology of Philosophical Studies Edited by Patricia Hanna Adrianne L. McEvoy Penelope Voutsina 3 An Anthology of Philosophical Studies PUBLISHED BY ATHENS INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 14 Solomou Street, 10683 Athens, Greece Tel. +30 210 36.34.210 Fax +30 210.36.34.209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of the Athens Institute for Education and Research. First Published: 2006 ISBN: 978-960-6672-11-8 Typeset, printed and binding by Theta Co. 4 Introduction Table of Contents List of Contributors i Introduction 1 Voutsina, P. PART I EPISTEMOLOGY 1. Imagination in Descartes’ Skepticism 7 Scholl, A. 2. Descartes on Sensations and Ideas of Sensations 17 Cunning, D. 3. The Myth of Hume’s Compatibilism 33 Morris, E.W. 4. From Contextualism to Skepticism 43 Wilburn, R. 5. The Puzzle of Self-Knowledge 51 Voutsina, P. 6. Unconfined Rationality: A Normative yet Realistic Model of 59 Inference Morado, R. and Savion, L. PART II METAPHYSICS AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 7. Language as Community Property: What’s Wrong with 75 Chomsky’s Individualism? Hanna, P. 8. What do Concepts Consist of? The Role of Geometric and 93 Proprioceptive Information in Categorization Dellantonio, S. and Pastore, L. 9. Personal Identity and Survival 105 Ward, A. 10. Emergence, Mind, Identity, Composition 119 Vision, G. 5 An Anthology of Philosophical Studies 11. On the Plausibility of Higher-Level Causation 137 Marras, A. 12. The Other Explanatory Gap 155 Yoo, J. 13. A Hylomorphic Solution to the Problem of Mental Causation 171 Jaworski, W. 14. Transcendental and Realist Philosophy 189 Pietersma, H. 15. How to be a Scientific Realist 199 Doppelt, G. PART III ETHICS 16. Morality without Metaphysics: Another Look at Hume’s 209 Sentimentalism Brown, C. 17. Moral Philosophy & Religious Ethics 221 Blizek, L.W. 18. Courage, Self-Trust and Self-Defence 235 Burrow, S. 19. Virtues Required by the Socially Reproductive Beings 247 Schuller, M.P. 20. A Human System Approach to Environmental Ethics 265 Choi, M.K. & Dixon, H. M. PART IV CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY AND PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION 21. Would Existentialism Exist if Hegel had been Correctly 283 Critiqued? Hegel, Kierkergaard and Philosophy of God Murphy, W.D. 22. The Audible Geometry of Cézanne: Merleau - Ponty’s Musical 299 Philosophy Wiskus, J. 6 Introduction 23. History and Love in Nietzsche: How Circe keeps us in her Grip 309 Burch, R. 24. Philosophy and Its Vicissitudes: A Psychiatric Approach to 323 Philosophical Historiography De Vleminck, J. 25. The Therapeutic Nature of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method 339 Gitsoulis, C. 26. A Philosophical View of the Clash of Civilizations 349 Nicholson, C. 27. The Contradiction Approach to Resolving Problems about 357 Omnipotence Wreen, M. 28. Boethius and the Problem of Evil 367 Weed, H.J. 29. God and God’s Form: On the Metaphysical Foundation of 379 Theology Kim, C.T. PART V POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 30. Temptation, Public Policy, and the Impairment of Personal 393 Autonomy Hughes, M.P. 31. Libertarianism and the Dichotomy between Positive and Negative 403 Rights Etieyibo, E. 32. Can there be a Nonconscequentialist Rights-Based Moral 421 Justification of Terrorism? Shanahan, T. 33. Globalization, Human Rights and Cultural Diversity: Humanism 433 and the Question of Difference Stivachtis, A.Y. 34. The Priority of Courts in the General Theory of Law 457 Sheinman, H. 7 Introduction i Introduction List of Contributors Blizek L. William, Professor, University of Nebraska, U.S.A. Brown Charlotte, Associate Professor, Illinois Wesleyan University, U.S.A. Burch Ruth, Doctoral Researcher, University of Warwick, U.K. Burrow Sylvia, Assistant Professor, Cape Breton University, Canada Choi Moon-Ki, Professor, Seowon University, South Korea Cunning David, Assistant Professor, University of Iowa, U.S.A. Dellantonio Sara, PhD Student, University of Trento, Italy De Vleminck Jens, PhD Student, Research Assistant, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium Dixon Harold Mark, Assistant Professor, Ohio Northern University, U.S.A. Doppelt Gerald, Professor, University of California, U.S.A. Etieyibo Edwin, PhD Student, University of Alberta, Canada Gitsoulis Chrysoula, Adjunct Lecturer, Baruch College, CUNY, U.S.A. Hanna Patricia, Professor, University of Utah, U.S.A. Hughes M. Paul, Professor, University of Michigan-Dearborn, U.S.A. Jaworski William, Assistant Professor, Fordham University, U.S.A. Kim Chin-Tai, Professor, Case Western Reserve University, U.S.A. Marras Ausonio, Professor, University of Western Ontario, Canada McEvoy Leigh Adrianne, Assistant Professor, Mansfield University, U.S.A. Morado Raymundo, Researcher, National University of Mexico, Mexico Morris Edward William, Associate Professor, Illinois Wesleyan University, U.S.A. Murphy W. Daniel, Assistant Professor, Saint Anselm College, U.S.A. Nicholson Carol, Professor, Rider University Lawrenceville, U.S.A. Pastore Luigi, Assistant Professor, University of Bari, Italy Pietersma Henry, Professor, University of Toronto, Canada Savion Leah, Faculty, Indiana University Bloomington, U.S.A. Scholl Ann, Assistant Professor, American University of Kuwait, Kuwait Schuller M. Peter, Associate Professor, Miami University, U.S.A. Shanahan Timothy, Professor, Loyola Marymount University, U.S.A. Sheinman Hanoch, Assistant Professor, Rice University, U.S.A. Stivachtis A. Yannis, Director, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, U.S.A. Vision Gerald, Professor, Temple University, U.S.A. Voutsina Penelope, PhD Student, University of Sheffield, U.K. Ward Andrew, Lecturer, University of York, U.K. Weed Hart Jennifer, Assistant Professor, Tyndale University College, Canada Wilburn Ronald, Assistant Professor, University of Nevada, U.S.A. Wiskus Jessica, Assistant Professor, Duquesne University, U.S.A. Wreen Michael, Professor, Marquette University, U.S.A. Yoo Julie, Assistant Professor, Lafayette College, U.S.A. i An Anthology of Philosophical Studies ii Introduction Introduction This volume includes selected philosophical papers that were presented in the 1st International Philosophical Conference in Athens that was organised by the Athens Institute for Research and Education. Over 120 speakers gathered to present papers on a wide range of topics. The aim of the following introductory comments is to make explicit the particular themes that individual emerge in all of the papers. The first part includes six papers that deal with current epistemological issues. The section begins with a paper by Assistant Professor A. Scholl from the American University of Kuwait. The main argument of this paper is that Descartes’ Skepticism deviates from traditional skeptical problems like the problem of Hallucination and Perceptual Relativity and proposes that Descartes’ arguments should be understood as arguments intended to conceive imagination and sense perception as genuine faculties of thought. This paper is followed by one written by Assistant Professor D. Cunning from the University of Iowa. His paper defends the thesis that some of the confusion surrounding the issue of the Cartesian sensations is due to Descartes’ interchangeable use of the language of ‘sensations’ and the language of ‘sensory’ ideas. The third paper is by Associate Professor W. Morris from Illinois Wesleyan University. The aim of his paper is to criticize Hume’s ‘compatibilism’ by making clear that it is largely due to the attempt to assimilate the doctrine of necessity to the metaphysical theses of free will and determinism. The fourth paper written by Assistant Professor R. Wilburn from University of Nevada, claims that contextualism generates scepticism as a conditional claim. According to the author, ‘external world’ scepticism has always emerged from manifestly contextualist assumptions about knowledge. The fifth paper is written by Ph.D student P. Voutsina from University of Sheffield and tutor of religious studies in Athens. This paper explores the conflict between philosophical intuitions and psychological accounts of self-knowledge. The author provides a rationale for the claim that we need an epistemology of self- knowledge that can subsume the psychological work on first-person error while leaving the intentional authority of agents intact. The last paper of that part is written by Researchers L. Savion and R. Morado from Indiana University and University of Mexico respectively. This paper proposes a notion of inference that includes both deductive methods and cognitive inferential heuristics that allows fallibility and aims to provide an alternative to already existing models of inference. In the second part nine papers deal with issues on metaphysics, philosophy of mind and philosophy of science. The part begins with a paper by Professor P. Hanna from University of Utah. Her paper elaborates a social account of language − based on results of research in child language acquisition − in contrast to Chomsky’s claim that knowledge of language is theoretical. This paper is followed by one written by Assistant Professor L. Pastore and Post- Doc S. Dellantonio from University of Bari and University of Trento respectively. The authors argue
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Timothy Williamson: Publications in reverse chronological order In preparation [a] ‘Knowledge, credence, and strength of belief’, invited for Amy Flowerree and Baron Reed (eds.), The Epistemic. [b] ‘Blackburn against moral realism’, for Paul Bloomfield and David Copp (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Realism, Oxford University Press. [c] ‘Non-modal normativity and norms of belief’, for Ilkka Niiniluoto and Sami Pihlstrom (eds.), volume on normativity, Acta Philosophica Fennica (2020). [d] ‘The KK principle and rotational symmetry’, invited for Analytic Philosophy. [e] ‘Chakrabarti and the Nyāya on knowability’. To appear [a] Suppose and Tell: The Semantics and Heuristics of Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. [b] (with Paul Boghossian) Debating the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. [c] ‘Edgington on possible knowledge of unknown truth’, in J. Hawthorne and L. Walters (eds.), Conditionals, Probability, and Paradox: Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [d] ‘Justifications, excuses, and skeptical scenarios’, in J. Dutant and F. Dorsch (eds.), The New Evil Demon, Oxford University Press. [e] ‘The counterfactual-based approach to modal epistemology’, in Otávio Bueno and Scott Shalkowski (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Modality, London: Routledge. [f] ‘More Oxonian scepticism about the a priori’, in Dylan Dodd and Elia Zardini (eds.), The A Priori: Its Significance, Grounds, and Extent, Oxford University Press. [g] ‘Reply to Casullo’s defence of the significance of the a priori – a posteriori distinction’, in Dylan Dodd and Elia Zardini (eds.), The A Priori: Its Significance, Grounds, and Extent, Oxford University Press. [h] ‘Introduction’ to Khaled Qutb, Summary of The Philosophy of Philosophy (in Arabic), Cairo: Academic Bookshop.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialectic at a Moving Standstill: the Neurotic Midadventures Of
    Macalester Journal of Philosophy Volume 13 Article 6 Issue 1 Spring 2004 5-1-2004 Dialectic at a Moving Standstill: The eurN otic Midadventures of Philosphy of Mind Dan Ganin Macalester College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo Recommended Citation Ganin, Dan (2004) "Dialectic at a Moving Standstill: The eN urotic Midadventures of Philosphy of Mind," Macalester Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 13: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo/vol13/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Macalester Journal of Philosophy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dialectic at a Moving Standstill: The Neurotic Misadventures of Philosophy of Mind Dan Ganin Introduction Relatively recently, numerous philosophers of mind have espoused the epistemic intractability and impenetrability of both the mind-body problem and the problem of consciousness. While past and present attempts to theoretically resolve and circumvent these metaphysical questions have assumed many forms and postulated numerous conceptual paradigms (substance dualism, property dualism, eliminative materi alism, functionalism, mind- body identity theory, logical behaviorism, idealism, etc.), the fundamental problem of epistemic inexplicability has not substantially dissipated since the rationalist ruminations of Descartes and Leibniz. The nascent articulatio n of the epistemological insolvability of the mind-body problem that has so gravely and garishly confronted contemporary theorists of mind can, in fact, be found in the philosophical work of these two notable modernist thinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of A.J. Ayer, with Replies 55 1
    TABLE OF CONTENTS FRONTISPIECE iv INTRODUCTION vii FOUNDER'S GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE LIBRARY OF LIVING PHILOSOPHERS ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xii PREFACE XVll PART ONE: INTELLECTUAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF A.J. AYER 1 Facsimile of Ayer's Handwriting 2 A.J. Ayer: My Mental Development 3 Still More of My Life 41 PART TWO: DESCRIPTIVE AND CRITICAL ESSAYS ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF A.J. AYER, WITH REPLIES 55 1. Evandro Agazzi: Varieties of Meaning and Truth 57 2. James Campbell: Ayer and Pragmatism 83 REPLY TO JAMES CAMPBELL 105 3. David S. Clarke, Jr.: On Judging Sufficiency of Evidence 109 REPLY TO DAVID S. CLARKE, JR. 125 4. Michael Dummett: The Metaphysics of Verificationism 128 REPLY TO MICHAEL DUMMETT 149 5. Elizabeth R. Eames: A.J. Ayer's Philosophical Method 157 REPLY TO ELIZABETH R. EAMES 175 6. John Foster: The Construction of the Physical World 179 REPLY TO JOHN FOSTER 198 xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS 7. Paul Gochet: On Sir Alfred Ayer's Theory of Truth 201 REPLY TO PAUL GOCHET 220 8. Martin Hollis: Man as a Subject for Social Science 225 REPLY TO MARTIN HOLLIS 237 9. Ted Honderich: Causation: One Thing Just Happens After Another 243 REPLY TO TED HONDERICH 271 lO. Tscha Hung: Ayer and the Vienna Circle 279 REPLY TO TSCHA HUNG 301 1l. Peter Kivy: Oh Boy! You Too!: Aesthetic Emotivism Reexamined 309 REPLY TO PETER KIVY 326 12. Arne Naess: Ayer on Metaphysics, a Critical Commentary by a Kind of Metaphysician 329 REPLY TO ARNE NAESS 341 13. D.J. O'Connor: Ayer on Free Will and Determinism 347 REPLY TO D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian K. Russell
    Gillian K. Russell Dianoia Institute of Philosophy (cell) +1 (858) 205{2834 Locked Bag 4115 MDC [email protected] Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 https://www.gillianrussell.net Australia Current Employment Professor of Philosophy Dianoia Institute at ACU in Melbourne 2020| 1 Arch´eProfessorial Fellow ( 5 th time) University of St Andrews, Scotland 2019{2023 Employment and Education History Alumni Distinguished Professor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2019{2020 Professor of Philosophy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2015{19 Associate Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2011{2015 Assistant Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2004{2011 Killam Postdoctoral Fellow University of Alberta 2005 Ph.D. in Philosophy Princeton University 2004 M.A. in Philosophy Princeton University 2002 M.A. in German and Philosophy University of St Andrews, Scotland 1999 Areas of Specialisation Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Logic, Epistemology Areas of Competence Logic, History of Analytic Philosophy, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Science and Mathematics Books { Truth in Virtue of Meaning: a defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction (Oxford, 2008) { The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, with Delia Graff Fara (eds.) (Routledge, 2011) { New Waves in Philosophical Logic, with Greg Restall (eds.) (Palgrave MacMillan, 2012) Accepted and Published Papers { \Social Spheres" forthcoming in Feminist Philosophy and Formal Logic Audrey Yap and Roy Cook (eds) { \Logic: A Feminist Approach" forthcoming in Philosophy for Girls: An invitation to the life of thought, M. Shew and K. Garchar (eds) (Oxford University Press, 2020) { \Waismann's Papers on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction" in Friedrich Waismann: The Open Texture of Analytic Philosophy, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Stroud 1935-2019
    BARRY STROUD 1935-2019 ized in frame of the WISDOM Journal. I am in great grief that we have lost such an important philosopher and member of our Editorial Board. Stroud passed away on Friday, August 9, 2019 of brain cancer1. He earned his B.A. from the University of Toronto and his Ph.D. from Harvard University2. While most popular for his work in epistemology and philosophical incredu- lity - just as his compositions on such logicians as David Hume and Ludwig Wittgenstein - Stroud's general heritage, fellow philosophers state, was his capacity to see the comprehensive view and get to the core of reasoning. Stroud was The loss of Barry Stroud affected the com- a provocative scholar. As a thinker, Stroud be- munity of philosophers in a very harsh way. One came an adult during when the overall Western of the great philosophers of the past half-century frame of mind was that philosophical inquiries was a key member of the editorial board at the could be replied by the sociologies, and he tested WISDOM journal. Stroud‟s cooperation with the those thoughts. WISDOM journal started the day the journal was Stroud's own work indicated another way: found, in 2013, with the help of his strong he connected without a moment's delay with in- friendship with academician Georg Brutian, the quiries in metaphysics, epistemology, the philos- Founder and Chief Editor of the periodi- ophy of our intellect, the hypothesis of signifi- cal WISDOM and founder-president of the Inter- cant worth, and more, declining to offer thought national Research Institute for Metaphilosophy, to any alleged limits between these subjects or to Transformational Logic and Theory of Argumen- concede to the supposed ability of those with a tation at Khachatur Abovian Armenian State specialist‟s command of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics of Soul and Self in Plotinus Gwenaëlle Aubry
    Metaphysics of soul and self in Plotinus Gwenaëlle Aubry To cite this version: Gwenaëlle Aubry. Metaphysics of soul and self in Plotinus. P. Remes; S. Slaveva-Griffin. The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, pp.310-323, 2014. hal-02387195 HAL Id: hal-02387195 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02387195 Submitted on 29 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 20 Metaphysics of soul and self in Plotinus Gwenaëlle Aubry One of the great singularities of the philosophy of Plotinus consists in thinking of the self1 for its own sake and, in particular, in producing a concept of it diff erent from that of soul.2 Th is philosophical breakthrough is inseparable from the discovery of immedi- ate refl exivity, that is, the subject’s ability to apprehend itself independently of its rela- tion to an object or to another subject.3 In Plotinus, however, this refl exivity occurs only in an interrogative form, which can be read, in particular, in Enn. I.1[53] and Enn. VI.4[22]. In other words, it does not, as in Descartes, assume the form of an intuition by means of which the subject, grasping itself as consciousness, would, at the same time, have an evident revelation of its essence.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU School of Architecture, Art, and Historic School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Preservation 2015 Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination" (2015). School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. Paper 31. http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John Hendrix In the thought of Plotinus, the imagination is responsible for the apprehen- sion of the activity of Intellect. If creativity in the arts involves an exercise of the imagination, the image-making power that links sense perception to noet- ic thought and the nous poietikos , the poetic or creative intellect, then the arts exercise the apprehension of intellectual activity and unconscious thought. According to John Dillon in “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imag- ination,” 1 Plotinus’ conception of the imagination led to the formulation of the imagination as a basis of artistic creativity. In Plotinus, imagination operates on several different levels: it produces images in sense perception, it synthesizes images in dianoetic thought, and it produces images in correspondence with the articulation through logos of noetic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed the World
    Suitable for children aged 14 to 16 Citizenship | Geography English | Science Feed the World Activity 1: Article Background Students should be instructed to read Feast or Famine: Meat Production There is more than enough food in the world to and World Hunger by Mark Hawthorne carefully. feed the entire human population, but millions of people still go hungry. By designing their own multiple-choice quizzes, students will Activity 2: Comprehension explore the link between meat production and Students should answer the following questions in order to heighten their world hunger. comprehension of the issues surrounding world hunger: Learning Objectives Questions Children should learn the following: 1. The writer describes a picture he saw in a museum in Washington. n To explore the link between the meat What does the picture symbolise to him? industry and world hunger 2. How is meat consumption linked to hunger? n What it means to be a global citizen 3. What happened during the Ethiopian famine of 1984? n That local actions can have global 4. Why is the writer particularly worried about recent trends in meat implications consumption? 5. Why does the writer argue that it’s better to grow soya beans than to raise cattle for meat? Accompanying Materials 6. What pun does the writer use? Feast or Famine: Meat Production and World 7. What might someone from the meat industry say about growing Hunger by Mark Hawthorne (student handout) grain and soya beans rather than meat? 8. What action does the writer think should be taken? Activity 3: Multiple-Choice Quiz Extension Ideas 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought
    THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT by MELISSA M. SHEW A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2008 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation of Approval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Melissa Shew Title: "The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department ofPhilosophy by: Peter Warnek, Chairperson, Philosophy John Lysaker, Member, Philosophy Ted Toadvine, Member, Philosophy James Crosswhite, Outside Member, English and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. September 6, 2008 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 An Abstract of the Dissertation of Melissa M. Shew for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy to be taken September 2008 Title: THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT Approved: Dr. Peter Warnek This dissertation engages three facets of Greek philosophy: 1) the phenomenon of tyche (chance, fortune, happening, or luck) in Aristotle's Physics, Nicomachean Ethics, and Poetics; 2) how tyche infonns Socrates' own philosophical practice in the Platonic dialogues; and 3) how engaging tyche in these Greek texts challenges established interpretations of Greek thought in contemporary scholarship and discussion. I argue that the complex status of tyche in Aristotle's texts, when combined with its appearance in the Platonic dialogues and the framework of Greek myth and poetry (poiesis), underscores the seriousness with which the Greeks consider the role of chance in human life.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights
    Portland State University PDXScholar Book Publishing Final Research Paper English 5-2017 Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights Gloria H. Mulvihill Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/eng_bookpubpaper Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Publishing Commons Recommended Citation Mulvihill, Gloria H., "Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights" (2017). Book Publishing Final Research Paper. 26. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/eng_bookpubpaper/26 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Publishing Final Research Paper by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mulvihill 1 Trends in Marketing for Books on Animal Rights Gloria H. Mulvihill MA in Book Publishing Thesis Spring 2017 Mulvihill 2 Abstract Though many of us have heard the mantra that we shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, marketers in book publishing bank on the fact that people do and will continue to buy and read books based not only on content, but its aesthetic appeal. This essay will examine the top four marketing trends that can be observed on the Amazon listings for books published on animal rights within the last ten years, specifically relating to titles, cover design, and the intended audience. From graphic adaptations of animals to traditional textbook approaches and animal photography, publishers are striving to evoke interest and investment in literature concerning a politically charged and inherently personal topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Reality Bite: a Peircean Approach to Epistemology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato Letting Reality Bite: A Peircean Approach to Teaching Undergraduate Epistemology Catherine Legg, University of Waikato 1) Introduction: Academic philosophers who have a research passion for Peirce and who suspect that he has the potential to revolutionize philosophy sometimes wonder how they might bring his ideas more into the teaching of undergraduates − where he frequently doesn’t feature at all, except in the US where a token coverage of his early papers seems to result largely from patriotism. Much could be said about specific Peircean ideas and theories which, if included in philosophy curricula, would expand and complicate the vision of philosophy to which students are exposed, and would most likely be greatly appreciated by many who feel troubled and undermined by a sense of narrowness in the current curriculum which they lack the resources to articulate.1 Just a few examples are Peirce’s understanding of pragmatism as a faith in the capacity of experimentation to deliver stable answers to our questions which − in ironic contrast to an understanding of pragmatism as a claim of ‘anything-goes’ − is in fact the most complete form of realism, his belief in final causes and its potential to resurrect ethical realism against positivism’s lingering nihilist onslaught, his distinctive objective idealism, so illuminatingly intermingled with his vision of (mathematical, logical and metaphysical) ‘continuity’, his belief in real chance, and his most elegant and ambitious theory of signs. Having said all this, however, in my opinion the most valuable legacy Peirce has given me as a teacher of undergraduate philosophy is not any of his theories but one of his instructions.
    [Show full text]