DOCSLIB.ORG

Surveymonkey Analyze

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surveymonkey Analyze Community engagement Page 2: About you Q1 Have you read the discussion paper associated No with this survey? Q2 Who are you completing this submission on behalf Yourself of? Page 3: Your organisation Q3 What is the name of that organisation? Respondent skipped this question Page 4: About you Q4 What is your name? Chris Cornish Q5 What best describes your relationship to local Council member, including Mayor or government? President Q6 What best describes your gender? Male Q7 What is your age? 36 - 45 Q8 Which local government do you interact with most? Bayswater (City) Page 5: About you Q9 Would you like to be updated on the progress of the No Local Government Act 1995 review and further opportunities to have your say? Q10 Do you wish for your responses to this survey to No be confidential? 1 / 388 Community engagement Page 6: Community engagement - setting the scene Q12 What methods of engagement do you believe are In person, most effective and appropriate in your community? (Please select all options that apply). Telephone, Online, Community forums, Citizen juries Q13 How could local governments engage with Respondent skipped this question different community groups (e.g. young people, seniors, families, people with disabilities, Aboriginal people, people from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse communities, etc.)? Page 7: Community engagement charter or policy Q14 To what extent do you support the following statements? "The Act needs to set rules for community engagement by Very unsupportive defining what community engagement is and how it should be done." "Local governments should be required to adopt a community Unsupportive engagement charter or policy." "All local governments should operate under a universal Unsupportive community engagement charter or policy." "Local governments should determine if they require Very supportive a community engagement charter or policy and the content of that charter or policy." Q15 Other jurisdictions have included principles with their engagement charter. How relevant do you believe each of these principles are? Engagement is genuine Relevant Engagement is inclusive and respectful Relevant Engagement is fit-for-purpose Relevant Engagement is informed and transparent Relevant Engagement processes must be reviewed and improved Neutral Page 8: When should a local government engage? 2 / 388 Community engagement Q16 In what circumstances should local governments When preparing or reviewing their Strategic be required to engage with the community? (Please Community Plan select all options that apply). , Only when the local government determines that it is necessary Page 9: Other comments Q17 Would you like to make any further comments Respondent skipped this question regarding community engagement? Additional information can also be provided to the review team via email at [email protected]. 3 / 388 Community engagement Page 2: About you Q1 Have you read the discussion paper associated Yes with this survey? Q2 Who are you completing this submission on behalf Yourself of? Page 3: Your organisation Q3 What is the name of that organisation? Respondent skipped this question Page 4: About you Q4 What is your name? Robert Elsbury Q5 What best describes your relationship to local Resident / government? ratepayer Q6 What best describes your gender? Male Q7 What is your age? 66 - 75 Q8 Which local government do you interact with most? Swan (City) Page 5: About you Q9 Would you like to be updated on the progress of the Yes Local Government Act 1995 review and further opportunities to have your say? Q10 Do you wish for your responses to this survey to No be confidential? 4 / 388 Community engagement Page 6: Community engagement - setting the scene Q12 What methods of engagement do you believe are In person, most effective and appropriate in your community? (Please select all options that apply). Community forums, Citizen juries Q13 How could local governments engage with different community groups (e.g. young people, seniors, families, people with disabilities, Aboriginal people, people from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse communities, etc.)? Each group will have it's own preference. My age group preference I expect will be "in person". Page 7: Community engagement charter or policy Q14 To what extent do you support the following statements? "The Act needs to set rules for community engagement by Very supportive defining what community engagement is and how it should be done." "Local governments should be required to adopt a community Very supportive engagement charter or policy." "All local governments should operate under a universal Very supportive community engagement charter or policy." "Local governments should determine if they require Very unsupportive a community engagement charter or policy and the content of that charter or policy." Q15 Other jurisdictions have included principles with their engagement charter. How relevant do you believe each of these principles are? Engagement is genuine Relevant Engagement is inclusive and respectful Relevant Engagement is fit-for-purpose Relevant Engagement is informed and transparent Relevant Engagement processes must be reviewed and improved Relevant Page 8: When should a local government engage? 5 / 388 Community engagement Q16 In what circumstances should local governments When preparing or reviewing their Strategic be required to engage with the community? (Please Community Plan select all options that apply). , When preparing their annual , budget Making a local , law Planning , matters Emergency and community infrastructure , planning Other (please specify): Resident and ratepayer groups should be the first step for LG. These groups can then communicate with the members for feedback. Page 9: Other comments Q17 Would you like to make any further comments regarding community engagement? Additional information can also be provided to the review team via email at [email protected]. City of Swan has a reputation for not sharing information, not consulting community, disregarding community feedback, disregarding motions passed at Special Electors meetings, and ignoring requests for information. This is the type of behavior that must be stamped out. 6 / 388 Community engagement Page 2: About you Q1 Have you read the discussion paper associated Yes with this survey? Q2 Who are you completing this submission on behalf An organisation, including a Local Government, peak of? body or a business Page 3: Your organisation Q3 What is the name of that organisation? City of Melville Page 4: About you Q4 What is your name? Mog Piasecka Q5 What best describes your relationship to local Staff member or CEO government? Q6 What best describes your gender? Female Q7 What is your age? 56 - 65 Q8 Which local government do you interact with most? Melville (City) Page 5: About you Q9 Would you like to be updated on the progress of the Yes Local Government Act 1995 review and further opportunities to have your say? 7 / 388 Community engagement Q10 Do you wish for your responses to this survey to No be confidential? Page 6: Community engagement - setting the scene Q12 What methods of engagement do you believe are In person, most effective and appropriate in your community? (Please select all options that apply). Telephone, Online, Community forums, Citizen juries, Other (please specify): Workshops using m-participation techniques to share insights, ideas etc in a live setting. This method levels the playing field for people unwilling or unable to express themselves in a public setting so that all voices are heard, not just those of people who are confident and articulate individuals. Q13 How could local governments engage with different community groups (e.g. young people, seniors, families, people with disabilities, Aboriginal people, people from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse communities, etc.)? Through officers qualified in the social sciences who can build relationships with the various populations. Most local governments have officers specialising in ageing, youth, families, people with disabilities and multi-cultural communities. Through the use of social impact assessment to determine who is most directly impacted by a project. Current 'power and influence' models of stakeholder profiling may unintentionally exclude those who are most impacted, focussing on the political imperatives rather than social needs. Page 7: Community engagement charter or policy Q14 To what extent do you support the following statements? "The Act needs to set rules for community engagement by Supportive defining what community engagement is and how it should be done." "Local governments should be required to adopt a community Supportive engagement charter or policy." "All local governments should operate under a universal Supportive community engagement charter or policy." "Local governments should determine if they require Neutral a community engagement charter or policy and the content of that charter or policy." 8 / 388 Community engagement Q15 Other jurisdictions have included principles with their engagement charter. How relevant do you believe each of these principles are? Engagement is genuine Relevant Engagement is inclusive and respectful Relevant Engagement is fit-for-purpose Relevant Engagement is informed and transparent Relevant Engagement processes must be reviewed and improved Relevant Page 8: When should a local government engage? Q16 In what circumstances should local governments When preparing or reviewing their Strategic be required to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group Minutes
    Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group Minutes Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries 264 Vincent Street, Leederville Thursday 4 July 2019 – 11am 1.0 WELCOME, ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES 1.1 Welcome Patrick Quigley welcomed attendees to the inaugural meeting of the Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group (MARAG). Patrick advised that the aim of MARAG was to provide leadership, coordination, advocacy and strategic direction relevant to the development and operation of metropolitan sport and recreation facilities, programs, services and projects. 1.2 Attending Patrick Quigley - City of South Perth David Bruce - City of Bayswater Marissa MacDonald - WALGA Jonelle Morley – DLGSC Alyce Atkinson – DLGSC Clayton White - DLGSC Leith Fradd – PLAWA Colby Halpin – City of Armadale Courtney Amlett – Town of Cambridge Dean Burton – City of Cockburn Tim Dayman – Town of Bassendean Salvatore Siciliano – Town of Bassendean Dan Barber – City of Bayswater Rachael Rowcroft – City of Gosnells Shane Fraser – City of Joondalup Stewart Winfield – Shire of Mundaring Amanda Cronin - City of Nedlands Sam Hegney – City of Rockingham Jason Parker- Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale Jess Fordham – City of South Perth Julie Rechichi – City of Subiaco Amy Fuller – City of Subiaco Michael Hayes – City of Subiaco Sarah Perkins – City of Swan Sarah Kitis – Town of Victoria Park Wayne Grimes – City of Vincent Sandra Watson – City of Vincent Samantha Culliver – City of Wanneroo Craig Bartlett – City of Wanneroo Wayne Stuart – City of Wanneroo Dan
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Local Government Policy Awards Showcase
    10th Anniversary THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICY AWARDS Children • Environment • Health 2020 Showcase Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries Images courtesy of PHAIWA. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from PHAIWA. To obtain further copies of this publication you can contact the following: PHAIWA GPO Box U1987 Perth WA 6845 Phone: (08) 9266 2489 Email: [email protected] Web: www.phaiwa.org.au Note the document may be accessed electronically from www.phaiwa.org.au © October 2020 Public Health Advocacy Institute of WA It can be cited as Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia (2020). 10th Anniversary - The Local Government Policy Awards Children Environment Health 2020 Showcase. Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia. Acknowledgements PHAIWA would like to thank The Minister for Local Government; Heritage; Culture and the Arts, Healthway, the WA Local Government Association, the Commissioner for Children and Young People WA and Cancer Council WA for their support and financial contributions towards the development and implementation of the Local Government Policy Awards. PHAIWA would like to make a special acknowledgment to Healthway for their 10 years of continued support of the project. Thank you to the Local Government’s City of Mandurah, Shire of Harvey, City of Kalamunda and Shire of Kondinin who have provided the cover images. Finally, PHAIWA would like to sincerely
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Planning Commission Acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of This Land
    December 2020 Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1373/57 (Minor Amendment) Old Railway Reserve, Kalamunda and Surrounds Report on Submissions Submissions City of Kalamunda Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1373/57 (Minor Amendment) Old Railway Reserve, Kalamunda and Surrounds Report on Submissions Submissions City of Kalamunda December 2020 The Western Australian Planning Commission acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of this land. We pay our respect to Elders past and present, their descendants who are with us today, and those who will follow in their footsteps. Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission Gordon Stephenson House 140 William Street Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1373/57 Report on Submissions Submissions File 833-2-24-68 Pt 1 & 2 Published December 2020 Internet: www.dplh.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 6551 8002 Fax: (08) 6551 9001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 This document is available in alternative formats on application to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage Communications Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Council Meeting Attachments Wednesday 18 September 2019
    Ordinary Council Meeting Attachments Wednesday 18 September 2019 REPORT PAGE REPORT TITLE AND ATTACHMENT DESCRIPTION NUMBER NUMBER(S) 9.3.1 List of Accounts Paid for the period ending 31 August 2019 1 – 10 Attachments 1. List of Accounts Paid as at 31 August 2019 9.3.2 Monthly Financial Reports for the Period Ending 31 July 2019 N/A Attachments 1. Monthly Financial Report for period ending 31 July 2019 9.4.1 Register of Policy Review Timeline 11 Attachments 1. Register of Policies Review Timeline 9.4.2 CSRFF Forward Planning Grant -Muchea Hall Change room 12 – 267 Redevelopment Attachments 1. Draft CSRFF Forward Planning Grant Application 2. Draft Business Case 3. Draft Cost Benefit Analysis 4. Draft Funding Strategy 9.4.3 Review of Chief Executive Officer Performance Criteria 268 – 270 Attachments 1. Performance Criteria as per CEO Contract 2. Draft Performance Criteria 9.4.4 Self-Supporting Loan Agreement between the Shire of Chittering and N/A Immaculate Heart College Attachments 1. Self-Supporting Loan Agreement Item 9.3.1 Attachment 1 SHIRE OF CHITTERING ACCOUNTS PAID AS AT 31 AUGUST 2019 PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 18 SEPTEMBER 2019 This Schedule of Accounts paid under delegated authority as detailed below, which is to be submitted to each member of Council on the 18 SEPTEMBER 2019, has been checked and is fully supported by vouchers and invoices which have been duly certified as to the receipt of goods, the rendition of services and as to prices, computations and costings. Voucher No's Pages Value Fund No.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Business Plan 2020-21 Performance Report Quarter 2 - October to December
    10.3.4 - Attachment 1 Corporate Business Plan 2020-21 Performance Report Quarter 2 - October to December Page 1 of 84 Ordinary Council Meeting - 15 March 2021 10.3.4 - Attachment 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................3 What is the Corporate Business Plan? .............................................................................................................................................3 Performance Reporting .....................................................................................................................................................................4 Report Structure ................................................................................................................................................................................4 Overall Performance Snapshot ............................................................................................................................................................6 Summary of progress ........................................................................................................................................................................6 Key Achievements and Highlights .....................................................................................................................................................6 PEOPLE – A connected, thriving, active
    [Show full text]
  • 10.4.1 - Attachment 1
    10.4.1 - Attachment 1 Ordinary Council Meeting - 21 June 2021 10.4.1 - Attachment 1 Acknowledgements The Shire of Serpentine Jarrahdale acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the land on which we work and live, and recognise their connection to the land and waters of this area. We pay respect to Elders past, present and emerging. The Shire would like to thank all of those who contributed to the development of this business case and for their ongoing commitment to making Jarrahdale a fantastic trails destination. Version No. Date Purpose/Change Editor V1 29/03/2021 Initial Draft Report Neil Tredwell V2 14/05/2021 Updated Draft Report Neil Tredwell V3 21/05/2021 Updated Draft Report Neil Tredwell V4 28/05/2021 Updated Draft Report Neil Tredwell V5 03/06/2021 Final Draft Report Neil Tredwell This report has been prepared by: Tredwell Management Services T: (08) 82346387 E: [email protected] W: www.tredwell.com.au Disclaimer We make every reasonable effort to ensure the information we source for your report is true, correct and accurate and that we fully and properly represent our findings to you. We endeavour only to work with reputable and experienced partners to obtain information and prepare our findings. Despite these efforts, the content and information provided by any third party is outside of our control and we do not make any warranty, representation or guarantee that such information is true, correct and free from errors or omissions. We will take all reasonable steps to verify any information obtained by us from third parties however we are not liable, whether directly or indirectly, for any loss, cost, expense, claim or inconvenience arising as a result of your use of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper on Implementation of Child Safety Officers in Local Governments WALGA Submission April 2021
    Discussion Paper on implementation of child safety officers in Local Governments WALGA Submission April 2021 Contact: Bec Waddington Policy Officer, Resilient Communities WALGA ONE70, LV 1, 170 Railway Parade West Leederville Phone: (08) 9213 2055 Email: [email protected] Website: www.walga.asn.au www.walga.asn.au 2 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary and Recommendations .............................................................. 4 2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Background ................................................................................................................ 6 4.0 Response to discussion paper questions .................................................................... 7 5.0 General Comments on Discussion Paper ................................................................. 10 6.0 Appendix: Engagement Methods .............................................................................. 14 www.walga.asn.au 3 1.0 Executive Summary and Recommendations Recommendation 6.12 of the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse (Royal Commission) provides: With support from governments at the national, state and territory levels, local governments should designate child safety officer positions from existing staff profiles to carry out the following functions: a) Developing child safe messages in local government venues, grounds and facilities b) Assisting local institutions to access online child safe resources
    [Show full text]
  • WABN Grants Program: Awarded Projects 2020-21
    * Some totals includes 2021-22 committed funding. Project locations are diagrammatic only. Regional Projects SEE TABLE BELOW FOR DETAILS $200,000 $514,820* $10,000 West Swan Rd Shared Path 3 Projects City of Swan Kimberley Region Whitfords Ave Shared Path Design City of Joondalup Indian Ocean $15,000 Hudson Ave / Girrawheen Ave / Wade Ct Shared Path Design City of Wanneroo $481,158* $20,000 2 Projects Quintilian Rd Shared Path Design Pilbara Region City of Nedlands $10,000 $110,000 $175,000 School Sport Circuit Feasibility High Wycombe Selby Street Shared Path City of Nedlands Connection to and Signals Improvement Forrestfield WESTERN Town of Cambridge Train Station AUSTRALIA $90,750 City of Kalamunda Eucla St to Glendalough Train Station Shared Path $150,000 City of Vincent Brockway Rd Shared Path $238,998* City of Nedlands 4 Projects $317,500* Berkshire Rd / Dundas Rd Mid West Region $335,000 Shared Path $47,500 Cannington to City of Kalamunda $937,437* Jeff Joseph Reserve Willetton Shared Path $18,000 Shared Path Design and Footbridge 14 Projects City of Canning Hale Rd to Dawson Ave Wheatbelt Region City of Melville Cycling Route Design City of Kalamunda SEE METRO MAP $242,500 1 Project Goldfields Esperance Region $67,500 $732,500* $210,000 Murdoch Dr Railway Pde Shared Path 2 Projects Shared Path Design William St to Ladywell St $1,181,885* Great Southern Region City of Melville City of Gosnells 10 Projects $45,000 South West Region The Crescent Shared Path Design [email protected] 16 March 2018; Plan No:9019202
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Statistics 5/04/2021 As At
    Local Government Statistics as at 5/04/2021 001 City of Albany Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Breaksea 4291 15.58% 02 Kalgan 4757 17.27% 03 Vancouver 4831 17.54% 04 West 4683 17.00% 05 Frederickstown 4475 16.25% 06 Yakamia 4502 16.35% District Total 27539 100.00% 129 City of Armadale Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Heron 7082 12.31% 02 River 7829 13.61% 03 Ranford 9345 16.25% 04 Minnawarra 7170 12.46% 05 Hills 7984 13.88% 06 Lake 10081 17.52% 07 Palomino 8034 13.97% District Total 57525 100.00% 105 Shire of Ashburton Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Ashburton 42 1.45% 03 Tom Price 1484 51.17% 04 Onslow 388 13.38% 06 Tableland 87 3.00% 07 Paraburdoo 633 21.83% 08 Pannawonica 266 9.17% District Total 2900 100.00% 002 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Augusta-Margaret River 11137 100.00% District Total 11137 100.00% 130 Town of Bassendean Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Bassendean 11293 100.00% District Total 11293 100.00% Page : 1 Local Government Statistics as at 5/04/2021 003 City of Bayswater Ward # Electors % Electors 01 North 12349 25.98% 02 Central 12106 25.47% 03 West 13602 28.62% 04 South 9470 19.93% District Total 47527 100.00% 116 City of Belmont Ward # Electors % Electors 01 West 9798 37.66% 02 South 8545 32.85% 03 East 7671 29.49% District Total 26014 100.00% 004 Shire of Beverley Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Beverley 1326 100.00% District Total 1326 100.00% 005 Shire of Boddington Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Boddington 1181 100.00% District Total 1181 100.00% 007 Shire of Boyup Brook Ward # Electors %
    [Show full text]
  • Current Applications Report Version 0.105.4
    Development Assessment Panels All Current Applications Report Version 0.105.4 Form 1 Dev Date Confirmed / Application DAP Application Meeting DAP Panel LG Name DAP at Creation Cost ($ Application Description Property Location Application Actual DAP Meeting Venue Type Reference Number Time Million) Received Meeting Date City of Perth LDAP City of Perth City of Perth LDAP FORM1 DAP/21/02030 $40m Nine (9) Storey Commercial Building Lot 58 (No.78) Mounts Bay Road, Perth 02/07/2021 Metro Inner-North Metro Inner-North City of Bayswater - 61 City of Bayswater FORM1 DAP/21/02033 $70m Mixed Use Development Lot 301 (168) Guildford Road, Maylands 04/07/2021 28/09/2021 09:30 AM JDAP JDAP Broun Avenue, Morley Metro Inner-North City of Nedlands FORM1 DAP/21/02014 $2m 10 Multiple Dwellings Lot 129 (38) Portland Street, Nedlands 07/06/2021 JDAP City of Nedlands -71 Metro Inner-North Lot 52 (11) & Lot 51 (13) Webster Street, FORM1 DAP/21/02013 $7m 12 Grouped Dwellings 08/06/2021 06/09/2021 09:00 AM Stirling Highway, JDAP Nedlands Nedlands Metro Inner-North FORM2 DAP/20/01781 $2.7m 3 Level Multiple Dwelling Development Lot 394 (20) Cooper St, Nedlands 01/09/2021 JDAP Metro Inner-North FORM2 DAP/20/01922 $5.8m Construction of 10 Multiple Dwellings Lot 372 (12) Philip Road, Dalkeith 07/07/2021 JDAP Metro West JDAP FORM2 DAP/19/01606 $20m Expansion of existing data storage facility Lot 15368 (37) Lemnos Street, Shenton Park 05/07/2021 13/09/2021 09:00 AM Zoom Meeting Mixed Use Development (26 Serviced Metro West JDAP SAT DAP/19/01655 $8m Lot 684 (135) Broadway,
    [Show full text]
  • Is Lake Leschenaultia a Healthy Lake?
    Visit www.perthseasternregion.com.au February/March 2020 Upcoming Dates: Wetland restoration project at Broz Park Clean Up Australia Day— By the Shire of Mundaring March 1 2020 World Water Day— March 22 2020 Earth Hour—March 28 2020 Quick Contacts: City of Kalamunda (08) 9257 9999 Shire of Mundaring (08) 9290 6666 City of Swan (08) 9267 9267 EMRC (08) 9424 2222 Broz Park wetland Let us know if you would like to Photo: Shire of Mundaring receive this newsletter via Late November last year the Shire of Mundaring was successful in our application for fund- email—it’s another way you can ing from the Western Australian Government’s State NRM Program to the value of $26,248 help the environment! over two years for the restoration of the lake at Broz Park, Helena Valley. To register, email the EMRC at Over the last couple of years, it was recognised that reduced rainfall, an increase in the population of water bird species, the feeding of these birds and a large number of feral [email protected] fish, predominately European carp, were all contributing to the poor water quality and with :“Subscribe to Greenpage” occurrence of algal blooms in the lake during the summer months. in the subject heading and your email contact details. For With the newly acquired grant funding and contributions from the Shire of Mundaring, it is further information, please our intention in the first year to undertake the removal of the feral fish, revegetate the water’s edge with 1,200 native sedges and undertake education programs regarding the contact Natasha Jones at the harm that feeding native wildlife can have on the birds and the water they live in.
    [Show full text]