Wbalmo Elbe / Module Czechia - Application Fields and First Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wbalmo Elbe / Module Czechia - Application Fields and First Results WBalMo Elbe / module Czechia - application fields and first results Hagen Koch1, Stefan Kaden2, Michael Kaltofen2 1Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Chair of Hydrology and Water Resources Management 2 WASY GmbH, Institute for Water Resources Planning and System Research GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 1. Contents 1. Contents 2. Relevance for the Overall Model 3. Input Data and Information 4. Development of Modules 5. First Results 6. Conclusion and Outlook GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 2. Relevance for the Overall Model - GLOWA-ELBE II sub-project Surface Water Availability: investigation of changes in the water availability in the whole Elbe River Basin under global change scenarios - Czech Republic covers one third of the Elbe River Basin roughly - Inflow to Germany at different locations: • Main stream of river Labe => Decin / Labe • Sub-basin of the river Mulde => downstream reservoir Prisecnice / Prisecnice => downstream reservoir Flaje / Flajsk potok - Effects of climate change and reservoir management in the Czech Republic will in all probability have an influence on inflow to Germany GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 3. Input Data and Information Basis for Data and Information “Agreement of co-operation” between GLOWA-ELBE II and the Czech River Basin Authorities Data and information delivered: • reservoirs to be included in the model (name, location, controllable storage, active storage, water surface area, etc.) => reservoirs with capacity equal or larger than 1 mill. m3 • water users, i.e. withdrawals and discharges (name, location, reference number of permit, monthly or yearly values for the last years, etc.) => quantity equal or larger than 0.01 m3/s • management of water resources facilities - e.g. water transfers between river reaches or reservoirs (name, location of intake and of orifice, capacity, etc.) GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 4. Development of Modules Structure of the Modules … is according to the river basin districts (Povodis) in the Czech Republic $T $T $T $T $T $T Ohre / Lower • Upper Vltava, $T$T$T Labe Upper / Middle$T T$ $T Labe $T $T $T • Lower Vltava, $T $T $T $T$T $T $T $T $T • Berounka, $T $T $T $T $T $T $T $T$T Berounka $T $T $T $T $T • Upper and Middle Labe, $T $T Lower $T $T Vltava $T $T$T • Ohre and Lower Labe. $T $T $T $T Upper Vltava $T $T 2002040Kilometers $T GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 4. Development of Modules Development of Modules …on the example of the module Upper and Middle Labe %# % # Legend: S# $ # % $ S# # % # % # S Withdrawals # # # % % % riversS%U S# % % # # % % %U Returnflows # % % % calculation%U profiles # % % % % ## % # %Reservoirs • Upper Vltava, ## % % reservoirs % % $ Rivers WBalMo S# # # S# S# S# %U % % River network% water users $ % % S# %U # S# % S# % % S# % % %US# %U # • Lower Vltava, S# % % S# S# % # % % % % # # %U # S# % % # % % % % % # # # # # % # % %# % % % % %# # • Berounka, % % % % % %U S# % % %# SS# $ % # % % %U S# % % % S# # %U S# % # % # % S# % • Upper and Middle Labe, S#%U % % # % % # # % # % % # % S S# % % % % %U %U S# S#S %U %U %U # S# # %# % %# % # S % % % % %%U% %U % # # # # # $ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % $ % % # # # %U # % # %# % % • Ohre and Lower Labe. % % % S# % # # # # % # # %$ % % % % % % # %# % # % %$ # % % # S# %# % SS# % %%US#%U % % % % % % % % % # ## %U # % #S# % % % # # # % S %U # % # % % # % % % % % % % S# # %U ## % %%U %U S# %# 5 % % $ % % %U % % # %U % $ # ## % %# % $ % %# $ S# # # % % % S#%# %$ # GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Results …for different fields/sectors and locations as example for possible kinds of analysis: • Effects of climate change on natural streamflows • Effects of climate change on regulated (managed) streamflows • Effects of climate change for different water users • Effects of climate change on filling of reservoirs GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Effects of climate change on natural streamflows 2.5 5.0 probability of exceedance 90% probability of exceedance 90% 2.0 probability of exceedance 99% probability of exceedance 99% 4.0 1.5 Jesenice #Y 3.0 1.0 #Y 2.0 Ceske Udoli streamflow [m³/s] streamflow streamflow [m³/s]streamflow 0.5 1.0 0.00.0 03-0703-07 08-12 08-12 13-17 13-17 18-22 18-22 23-27 23-27 28-32 28-32 33-37 33-37 38-42 38-42 43-47 43-47 48-52 48-52 5-year-periods5-year-periods (years(years 2003-2052)2003-2052) GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Effects of climate change on regulated (managed) streamflows Decin #Y Labska 120 #Y 60 MQ, 1st period (2003-2007) #Y 360 Usti nad Labem MQ, 10th period (2048-2052) Les 100 #Y Kralovstvi #Y 50 NMQ, 1st period (2003-2007)Litomerice 300 #Y Melnik ] NMQ, 10th period (2048-2052) #Y ] ] s Vranany / s Nymburk s 3 / / 80 #Y Nemcice#Y 3 40 #Y 240 3 m Brandys m m [ Brandys #Y [ [ #Y nad Labem w Pardubice w w o o o l 60 l l 30 #Y Vrane 180 f f f m m m a a a e e e r r r 20 120 t t t 40 s s s 1020 60 0 #Y Korensko 0 0 Ceske Decin #Y Melnik Labska Budejovice Vrane Nemcice Nymburk Les Les Kralovstvi Pardubice Litomerice Vranany Brandys Brandys Labem nad Usti Labem nad Korensko Vyssi Brod Vyssi Ceske Ceske Budejovice #Y Vyssi Brod GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Safety of drinking water provision for the city of Prague Drinking water for the city of Prague is provided by three sources: • Withdrawal directly from the river Vltava in Prague, • Transfer from the area between the cities of Sojovice and Karany (bank filtration), • Transfer from reservoir Svihov (Zelivka). 100 90 80 bank 70 filtration 60 Prague 50 40 30 Prazske vodarny, 20 vodarnaPVKPVK PrahaPraha Karany/Sojovice UV PodoliZelivka 333 SafetySafetySafetyofofof achievement achievement achievement [%] [%] [%] 10 demand=demand=demand= 1,835,250,6 m mm/s/s/s reservoir 0 Svihov 03-07 08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 5-year-periods (years 2003-2052) GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Comparison of real values for withdrawal (year periods (years 2003 - 2052). 6.0 s] 3 / 5.0 [m al 4.0 aw dr 3.0 th wi 2.0 1.0 0.0 Reservoir Svihov (Zelivka) GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 1991 real values (years 1991-2004) withdrawal, real 1992 mean value for year 1993 1994 1995 s 1991 -2004) with simulated values for all ten 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 s withdrawal, simulated i 03-07 m mean value for period u 08-12 minimum value for period la t e d 13-17 , 5 - y 18-22 e a r 23-27 - p e r 28-32 io d s 33-37 ( 2 0 38-42 0 3 - 2 43-47 0 5 2 ) 48-52 Schmalzgrube/ Preßnitz #Y Probability ofof exceedanceexceedance 99% 99% inflowinflow to reservoir (sum) drinking water supply (UV Hradiste) streamflowPreßnitz below reservoir streamflow CSchmalzgrubeap.= 0.961c b/ Preßnitzm/s #Y Transfer from reservoir Prisecnice for UV Hradiste Qmin= 0.050 cbm/s modules for the rivers Ohre and Mulde s / m b m c o fr a 7 . r d r Sub-Basin of river Ohre 7 e o i f o = s V v e . r Sub-Basin p n a ic a n e a r r s n of river Mulde C e e c T r e #Y C is to r P a d o e v c i á n n 5. First Results Qmin= r c e 0.060 cbm/s e C Inflow to Germany downstream reservoir Prisecnice (at Schmalzgrube / Preßnitz) – s í r P 0.4 5-year-periods (years 2003-2052) h 0.3 c a b l h ö 0.2 P 1012Kilometers 0.1 03-07 08-12 13-17 18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 streamflow, release [m³/s] release streamflow, 0.0 GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 5. First Results Filling of Reservoirs Active capacity $T Probability$T $T of exceedance 99% reservoir Lipno I reservoir$T Lipno I $T reservoir $TOrlik Ohre / Lower reservoir Orlik Labe $T reservoir$T$T$T$T Hracholusky Upper / Middlereservoir Hracholusky $T Labe $T Rozkos reservoir Rozkos reservoir RozkosRozkos $T $T reservoir Nechranice reservoir Nechranice Nechranice $T $T 400 $T $T$T $T $T $T $T 350 $T $T $T $T $T $T $T $T$T 300 Berounka $T $T $T $T $T $T $T Lower $T 250 Hracholusky $T Vltava $T $T$T $T 200 Orlik 150 $T $T 100 $T Upper 50 Vltava $T Filling of reservoir [Mio m³] [Mio of reservoir Filling 0 Lipno I $T 2002040Kilometers 03-07 08-12 13-17Lipno 18-22I 23-27$T 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 5-year-periods (years 2003-2052) GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez. 2006 Potsdam Hagen Koch et al., BTU Cottbus 6. Conclusion and Outlook Conclusions: • Climate change will affect water availability in the Czech part of the Elbe River Basin • Affects will be different at different locations and within seasons (e.g. rising streamflows during winter and falling streamflows during summer and autumn) • Streamflows during low flow episodes will fall generally • Drinking water provision from reservoirs is sector most affected, for other water users water can be provided with high safety • Under extreme dry conditions the water level in some reservoirs will fall significantly while other reservoirs are unaffected • Adapted/changed management of reservoirs might compensate for some of the effects of climate change Outlook: • Analysis of results in consultation of Povodis (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • FISHING REGULATIONS and REGISTER of FISHERIES for Holders of Regional Fishing Permits for Non-Salmonid and Salmonid Waters Valid for the Years 2017 and 2018 Part III
    CZECH ANGLERS UNION registered association West-Bohemia Regional Board FISHING REGULATIONS AND REGISTER OF FISHERIES for holders of regional fishing permits for non-salmonid and salmonid waters Valid for the years 2017 and 2018 Part III. of the fishing permit Úřední hodiny kanceláře: středa–neděle 8:00–10:00 hod. a 15:00–17:00 hod. FISHING REGULATIONS AND REGISTER OF FISHERIES OF THE CZECH ANGLERS for holders of regional fishing permits for non-salmonid and salmonid waters Valid for the years 2017 and 2018 CZECH ANGLERS UNION, registered association West-Bohemia Regional Board Tovární 5. 301 00 Plzeň • phone: 377 223 569 • fax: 377 328 789 e-mail: [email protected] • www.crsplzen.cz Introduction INTRODUCTION The list of fi sheries includes the number and name of the fi shery, the user of the fi shery or organization responsible for its management, the respective length in kilometres (stream) and the area in hectares, as well as defi ning the borders and position of the fi shery (moreover, using GPS coordinates), or a more detailed specifi cation of the water areas belonging to the fi shery, and the designation of protected fi sh areas. Each holder of a fi shing permit is obliged to get acquainted with the description of the fi shery, where he/she intends to fi sh before actually starting fi shing. The Fishing Regulations and Register of Fisheries correspond to status of October 1. 2016. Eventual subsequent changes are not included. Designation of suitable fi sheries for disabled anglers Since 2012. the wheelchair symbol is newly found in some fi sheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in the Czech Republic in June 2013
    FLOODS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN JUNE 2013 978-80-87577-42-4 OBALKA_AJ.indd 1 13.2.2015 12:59:30 CZECH HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE FLOODS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN JUNE 2013 Editors: Jan Daňhelka, Jan Kubát, Petr Šercl, Radek Čekal Prague 2014 01_04_zacatek.indd 1 13.2.2015 11:16:38 This publication presents key outputs of the project „Evaluation of Floods in the Czech Republic in June 2013“ guaranteed by the Ministry of Enviroment of the Czech Republic. Editors: Jan Daňhelka, Jan Kubát, Petr Šercl, Radek Čekal leading AUTHORS OF THE PROJECT Karel Březina, Radek Čekal, Lukáš Drbola, Jan Chroumal, Stanislav Juráň, Jiří Kladivo, Tomáš Kříž, Jan Kubát, Jiří Petr, David Polách, Marek Roll, Marjan Sandev, Jan Střeštík, Petr Šercl, Jan Šikula, Pavla Ště- pánková, Michal Tanajewski, Zdena Vaňková CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Radmila Brožková, Martin Caletka, Martin Caletka, Pavel Coufal, Lenka Crhová, Radek Čekal, Petr Čtvr- tečka, Jan Čurda, Jan Daňhelka, Barbora Dudíková Schulmannová, Igor Dvořák, Miloš Dvořák, Tomáš Fryč, Petr Glonek, Jarmila Halířová, Aleš Havlík, Aleš Havlín, Eva Holtanová, Tomáš Hroch, Petr Jiřinec, Jana Kaiglová, Lucie Kašičková, František Konečný, Michal Korytář, Jakub Krejčí, Vladimíra Krejčí, Jiří Kroča, Jiří Krupička, Martin Krupka, Daniel Kurka, Petr Kycl, Richard Lojka, Radka Makovcová, Jan Ma- lík, Ján Mašek, Helena Nováková, Radek Novotný, Roman Novotný, Martin Pecha, Libor Pěkný, Michal Poňavič, Petr Sklenář, František Smrčka, Petr Smrž, Jarmila Suchánková, Marcela Svobodová, Milada Šandová, Jan Šedivka, Pavel Šmejda, Veronika Štědrá, Ondřej Švarc, Radka Švecová, Pavel Tachecí, Vanda Tomšovičová, Alena Trojáková, Radovan Tyl, Anna Valeriánová, Michal Valeš, Tomáš Vlasák, Eliška Žáčková, Stanislav Žatecký and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of the Regions Volume 6 Czech Republic / Poland
    PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS 13 16 17 CA-17-98-281-EN-C PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 6 CZECH REPUBLIC POLAND VOLUME 6 CZECH REPUBLIC / POLAND Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: EUR 50 ISBN 92-828-4395-5 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,!7IJ2I2-iedjfg! EUROPEAN COMMISSION › L-2985 Luxembourg ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 6 CZECH REPUBLIC POLAND EUROPEAN COMMISSION ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities Immediate access to harmonized statistical data Eurostat Data Shops: A personalised data retrieval service In order to provide the greatest possible number of people with access to high-quality statistical information, Eurostat has developed an extensive network of Data Shops (1). Data Shops provide a wide range of tailor-made services: # immediate information searches undertaken by a team of experts in European statistics; # rapid and personalised response that takes account of the specified search requirements and intended use; # a choice of data carrier depending on the type of information required. Information can be requested by phone, mail, fax or e-mail. (1) See list of Eurostat Data Shops at the end of the publication. Internet: Essentials on Community statistical news # Euro indicators: more than 100 indicators on the euro-zone; harmonized, comparable, and free of charge; # About Eurostat: what it does and how it works; # Products and databases: a detailed description of what Eurostat has to offer; # Indicators on the European Union: convergence criteria; euro yield curve and further main indicators on the European Union at your disposal; # Press releases: direct access to all Eurostat press releases.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Europe
    G5702 EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5702 Alps see G6035+ .B3 Baltic Sea .B4 Baltic Shield .C3 Carpathian Mountains .C6 Coasts/Continental shelf .G4 Genoa, Gulf of .G7 Great Alföld .P9 Pyrenees .R5 Rhine River .S3 Scheldt River .T5 Tisza River 1971 G5722 WESTERN EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL G5722 FEATURES, ETC. .A7 Ardennes .A9 Autoroute E10 .F5 Flanders .G3 Gaul .M3 Meuse River 1972 G5741.S BRITISH ISLES. HISTORY G5741.S .S1 General .S2 To 1066 .S3 Medieval period, 1066-1485 .S33 Norman period, 1066-1154 .S35 Plantagenets, 1154-1399 .S37 15th century .S4 Modern period, 1485- .S45 16th century: Tudors, 1485-1603 .S5 17th century: Stuarts, 1603-1714 .S53 Commonwealth and protectorate, 1660-1688 .S54 18th century .S55 19th century .S6 20th century .S65 World War I .S7 World War II 1973 G5742 BRITISH ISLES. GREAT BRITAIN. REGIONS, G5742 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Continental shelf .I6 Irish Sea .N3 National Cycle Network 1974 G5752 ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5752 .A3 Aire River .A42 Akeman Street .A43 Alde River .A7 Arun River .A75 Ashby Canal .A77 Ashdown Forest .A83 Avon, River [Gloucestershire-Avon] .A85 Avon, River [Leicestershire-Gloucestershire] .A87 Axholme, Isle of .A9 Aylesbury, Vale of .B3 Barnstaple Bay .B35 Basingstoke Canal .B36 Bassenthwaite Lake .B38 Baugh Fell .B385 Beachy Head .B386 Belvoir, Vale of .B387 Bere, Forest of .B39 Berkeley, Vale of .B4 Berkshire Downs .B42 Beult, River .B43 Bignor Hill .B44 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal .B45 Black Country .B48 Black Hill .B49 Blackdown Hills .B493 Blackmoor [Moor] .B495 Blackmoor Vale .B5 Bleaklow Hill .B54 Blenheim Park .B6 Bodmin Moor .B64 Border Forest Park .B66 Bourne Valley .B68 Bowland, Forest of .B7 Breckland .B715 Bredon Hill .B717 Brendon Hills .B72 Bridgewater Canal .B723 Bridgwater Bay .B724 Bridlington Bay .B725 Bristol Channel .B73 Broads, The .B76 Brown Clee Hill .B8 Burnham Beeches .B84 Burntwick Island .C34 Cam, River .C37 Cannock Chase .C38 Canvey Island [Island] 1975 G5752 ENGLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodní Útvary Povrchových Vod Podle ORP Stránka 1/46
    Tabulka 1 - Vodní útvary povrchových vod podle ORP Stránka 1/46 rizikový vodní název ORP kód ORP ID VÚ název VÚ kategorie VÚ dílčí povodí útvar Aš 4101 OHL_0040 Libský potok od hranice po ústí do Ohře řeka OHL ano OHL_0090 Slatinný potok od pramene po ústí do Ohře řeka OHL ano OHL_0100 Sázek od státní hranice po Stodolský potok řeka OHL ano OHL_0110 Stodolský potok od pramene po ústí do toku Sázek řeka OHL ano OHL_1410 Bílý Halštrov/Weisse Elster od pramene po státní hranici řeka OHL ano OHL_3400 Bystřina od pramene po ústí do Rokytnice řeka OHL ano OHL_3500 Rokytnice/Regnitz od pramene po státní hranici řeka OHL ano Benešov 2101 DVL_0070 Křečovický potok od pramene po ústí do toku Mastník řeka DVL ano DVL_0080 Mastník od toku Sedlecký potok po vzdutí nádrže Slapy řeka DVL ano DVL_0095_J Nádrž Slapy na toku Vltava jezero DVL ano DVL_0110 Vltava od hráze nádrže Slapy po tok Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0570 Polánecký potok od pramene po ústí do Blanice řeka DVL ano DVL_0580 Chotýšanka od pramene po ústí do Blanice řeka DVL ano DVL_0590 Blanice od toku Slupský potok po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0600 Křešický potok od pramene po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0620 Sázava od toku Želivka (Hejlovka) po Nučický potok řeka DVL ano DVL_0630 Nučický potok od pramene po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0650 Mnichovka od pramene po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0660 Benešovský potok od pramene po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0670 Konopišťský potok od pramene po ústí do toku Sázava řeka DVL ano DVL_0680 Mokřanský potok
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Regions
    Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic Czech Republic Portraits of Regions Prague 2005 Czech Republic – Portraits of Regions Published in 2005 by: Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic Staroměstské náměstí 6 110 15 Praha 1 Produced by: Centre for Regional Development Masaryk University in Brno Žerotínovo náměstí 9 601 77 Brno in cooperation with Department of Geography Faculty of Natural Sciences Palacký University in Olomouc třída Svobody 26 771 46 Olomouc Authors: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Václav Toušek, CSc. Dr. Irena Smolová, Ph.D. Dr. Miloš Fňukal, Ph.D. Martin Jurek, M.Sc. Pavel Klapka, M.A. English translation: Pavel Klapka, M.A. Jana Chybová, M.A. Steven Schwartzhoff, M. A. Maps: Aleš Létal, Ph.D. Guarantor for the Ministry for Regional Development: Milan Damborský, M.Sc. Graphic layout: Marie Dašková Print: Ing. Viktor Hořín – EPAVA Chválkovická 5 779 00 Olomouc Edition: 11,000 copies Closing: October 2005 Not for sale ISBN 80−239−6346−5 Contens Introduction . 7 Environment . 9 People . 24 Economy . 34 Portraits of Regions Capital City of Prague . 50 Středočeský Region . 56 Jihočeský Region . 62 Plzeňský Region . 68 Karlovarský Region. 74 Ústecký Region . 80 Liberecký Region . 86 Královéhradecký Region . 92 Pardubický Region . 98 Vysočina Region. 104 Jihomoravský Region . 110 Olomoucký Region . 116 Zlínský Region . 122 Moravskoslezský Region. 128 Literature and sources . 134 Foreword The elaboration of this publication was initiated by the Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic. The publication introduces both Czech and foreign readers to topical trends of the socio−economic development of the regions in the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Event™ July 12Th 2013
    FLOOD DAMAGE SURVEY REPORT eVENT™ July 12th 2013 2013 Elbe and Danube Floods in Germany, Austria and Central and Eastern Europe Willis’ post-event field damage survey report As the flood wave travelled down from the headwaters of Rivers Elbe and Danube, members of the Willis Flood Team spent five days in the field surveying water depths and damages caused by the floods across the affected region. In addition, the teams assessed the effectiveness of flood defences along the banks of rivers in Germany, Austria, and Czech Republic. This report summarizes the findings from this damage survey, including the use of mobile technology, and details the development of the Willis Flood Footprint. Overview In June 2013, much of southern and eastern Germany, northern Austria and western Czech Republic were affected by significant flooding caused by prolonged heavy rainfall over the region. In many areas, these were the largest floods since the devastating Elbe and Danube floods of 2002 and in some locations along the Danube, Saale and lower Elbe, the floods were the worst in recorded history. As the flood wave travelled down Rivers Elbe and Danube, representatives of Willis and the Willis Research Network (WRN) spent five days in the field surveying the affected regions. The main objectives of the damage survey were to: a) survey flood depths and extents, b) assess the damage caused by the floods to individual properties, and c) assess the effectiveness of the flood defences throughout the region. Despite road closures and the remaining flood waters, the survey teams were able to visit a number of affected locations in Bavaria in Germany, Lower Austria, and Prague and surroundings in Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL CITY of PRAGUE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGY Cover Photo Václav Hykeš Contents
    CAPITAL CITY OF PRAGUE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGY Cover photo Václav Hykeš Contents Introduction 4 1. Observed and projected climate change effects in Prague 6 2. Assessment of vulnerability to climate change effects in Prague including the non-action option 9 3. Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy vision 15 4. Main and specific targets in the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation 17 Strategy and a proposal on adaptation measures A Adaptations to increasing temperatures, urban heat island and heat waves 18 Adaptation measures to reducing impacts of torrential rainfall, floods and long-term drought 24 B on the Capital City of Prague´s territory C Adaptation measures to reduce energy performance in Prague incl. adaptations in buildings 30 D Adaptation measures in risk management and providing citizens with safety 34 E Adaptation measures in sustainable mobility 38 Adaptation measures in communication, education and public awareness/environmental 40 F education 5. Proposal of the Capital City of Prague Implementation Plan 2018-2019 development 42 Appendixes 43 I. List of policy documents related to the Capital City of Prague Climate Change Adaptation Strategy 44 II. Table of specific targets and measures provided by the Capital City of Prague Climate Change 45 Adaptation Strategy III. Primary information 62 IV. Good practice examples/lessons learnt in Prague 65 CAPITAL CITY OF PRAGUE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGY 3 AIM Reducing vulnerability of the Capital City of Prague, the Czech Republic, to climate change effects aiming at improving the environment for its inhabitants in future. VISION Enhancing a long-term resilience and reducing vulnerability of the Capital City of Prague to climate change effects by step-by-step implementation of adaptive measures, preferably applying nature-based solutions combined with grey, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Cost D1.1
    Assessing the economic case for adaptation to extreme events at different scales Onno Kuik, Paolo Scussolini, Reinhard Mechler, Junko Mochizuki, Alistair Hunt, Jacob Wellman Deliverable number 5.1 Work Package Number 5 Submission date January 2016 Type of Activity RTD Nature R = Report Dissemination level Public Document information Assessing the economic case for adaptation to extreme Title: events at different scales Onno Kuik, Paolo Scussolini, Reinhard Mechler, Junko Authors: Mochizuki, Alistair Hunt, Jacob Wellman Other Contributors Petra Honja Date: 19 January 2016 Contact details Onno Kuik, [email protected] Work Package Number WP 5 Deliverable number D5.1 Filename: Deliverable 5-1 final.docx Document history: Draft/ Final and version number Type of Activity RTD Nature R = Report, O = Other Dissemination / distribution PU = Public: level Citation: Copyright: The ECONADAPT project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 603906. To find out more about the ECONADAPT project, please visit the web-site: www.econadapt.eu For further information on the ECONADAPT project contact Alistair Hunt at: [email protected] The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The European Community is not liable for any use made of this information. Executive Summary This report examines Disaster Risk Management (DRM) strategies of European countries with the aims of understanding how decisions are taken in the selection and design of DRM options at different scales, to examine how climate change, and its associated uncertainty, is or could be integrated into DRM strategies, and to draw lessons for decisions related to adaptation to climate change in Europe in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Contribution of Selected Non-Point Pollution Sources to the Phosphorus and Nitrogen Loads in Water Bodies of the Vltava River Basin
    Original Paper Soil & Water Res., 11, 2016 (3): 196−204 doi: 10.17221/15/2015-SWR Estimated Contribution of Selected Non-point Pollution Sources to the Phosphorus and Nitrogen Loads in Water Bodies of the Vltava River Basin Pavel ROSENDORF, Petr VYSKOČ, Hana PRCHALOVÁ and Daniel FIALA Department of Protection of Aquatic Ecosystems, T.G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic Abstract Rosendorf P., Vyskoč P., Prchalová H., Fiala D. (2016): Estimated contribution of selected non-point pollution sources to the phosphorus and nitrogen loads in water bodies of the Vltava river basin. Soil & Water Res., 11: 196−204. Eutrophication of inland waters by phosphorus as well as loads of coastal and marine waters by nitrogen is a major problem that impedes water bodies to meet the status defined by the Water Framework Directive. In order to reduce the nutrient load on the aquatic environment, first the significance of various pollution types should be thoroughly analyzed. The analysis of phosphorus runoff from agricultural land under normal rainfall-runoff conditions, and of nitrogen runoff associated with the application of manure on farmland shows their different impact on water body status in the Vltava river basin. The assessment of phosphorus indicates that annual specific phosphorus runoff ranges from 0.1 to 9.98 kg/km2 and in the sub-basins of the Upper Vltava, Berounka, and Lower Vltava, the average values from all water bodies reach 4.08, 2.92, and 4.02 kg/km2, respectively. Compared with the allowable capacity of water bodies for achieving a good status, the average rate of phosphorus input on the load of water bodies comes within 20%, with a maximum value slightly exceeding 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Changes in Frequency and Seasonality of Extreme Floods In
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 1633–1652, 2015 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/12/1633/2015/ doi:10.5194/hessd-12-1633-2015 HESSD © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 12, 1633–1652, 2015 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Historical changes in Sciences (HESS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in HESS if available. frequency and seasonality of extreme floods in Historical changes in frequency and Prague seasonality of extreme floods in Prague L. Elleder L. Elleder Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, Czech Republic Title Page Received: 22 December 2014 – Accepted: 9 January 2015 – Published: 4 February 2015 Abstract Introduction Correspondence to: L. Elleder ([email protected]) Conclusions References Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Tables Figures J I J I Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 1633 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract HESSD This study presents a flood frequency analysis for the Vltava River catchment using a major profile in Prague. The estimates of peak discharges for the pre-instrumental 12, 1633–1652, 2015 period of 1118–1824 based on documentary sources were carried out using different 5 approaches. 187 flood peak discharges derived for the pre-instrumental period aug- Historical changes in mented 150 records for the instrumental period of 1825–2013. Flood selection was frequency and based on Q10 criteria. Six flood-rich periods in total were identified for 1118–2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 1503 M<011B>Sto Beroun Beroun M<011B> Bere Dosp<011B>Lí EN
    walking trails around town Beroun TOURIST GUIDE • ADULT • BEROUNreally gets me DOSPĚLÍDOSPELÍ • ADULT• ADULT Trasa TrasaA historická A – historická Trail ARoute historical A – historical Trasa TrasaB poznávací B – poznávací Trail BRoute sightseeing B – cognitive 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 m Trasa TrasaC turistická C – turistická © Map Design & , 2015 – www.mapdesign.eu Trail CRoute tourist C – tourist 5 BEROUN really gets me BEROUN Na Nové, 69 Husovo Square really gets me A 14th century burgher’s house. Also called Na Nové according to a former inn. In the 16th century, the This guide will lead you to Beroun’s most impor- trails according to the kind of places you would house owner, Matěj Střelec, a burgomaster of Beroun, tant cultural sites and historical buildings, as well like to visit. There is a historical, educational and used to make fi rearms here and ran an inn called as to other, no less interesting places, such as Za- tourist trail. Take a trip to see the sights of Be- U Střelců. In 1781, soldiers of the Kallenberg regiment jíček Mill, the Jewish cemetery and a bunker. The roun. Besides learning lots of new information, were accommodated in the house and at Christmas, trail is suitable not only for adults but also for fa- you will also visit some more remote but more while looking for tobacco stored in the attic, they milies with children. You can select from several picturesque recesses of the town. started a fi re due to their carelessness. House No. 69 and the town hall burned down.
    [Show full text]