DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Participation of National Minorities in the Danish-German Border Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Participation of National Minorities in the Danish-German Border Region Political Participation of National Minorities in the Danish-German Border Region A series of studies on two hard-to-identify populations in a role-model-region Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) an der Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von Adrian Schaefer-Rolffs Hamburg, den 06.06.2016 Erstgutachter : Prof. Dr. Kai-Uwe Schnapp Zweitgutachterin : Prof. Dr. Tove Hansen Malloy Tag der Disputation : 26.09.2016 “Always the hard way. Nothing was ever handed to me. Always the hard way. You taught me truth, you gave me strength. I learned everything the hard way” (Nicholas Jett and Scott C. Vogel) Contents Contents Contents ............................................................................................. V List of tables ............................................................................................ IX List of figures .......................................................................................... XI Abbreviations ....................................................................................... XIII Acknowledgements ................................................................................ XV Part I. Introductory part ..................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 3 1.1. Positioning and reflexivity .................................................................... 7 1.2. Relevant literature .................................................................................. 9 1.3. The research gap .................................................................................. 13 2. The papers’ scientific objectives ....................................................... 17 2.1. Applying a theoretical framework to the DGBR ............................ 17 2.2. Mapping national minority political participation mechanisms in the DGBR .................................................................................................... 19 2.3. Understanding what national minority members believe “minority” means ..................................................................................................... 22 2.4. Finding out what the minorities think about their political participation .......................................................................................... 26 Part II. Individual Papers .................................. 29 3. Minority Politics in Practice. Protection and Empowerment in the DGBR ............................................................................................. 31 3.1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 31 3.2. The OHCHR Plan of Action ............................................................. 33 3.2.1. Challenges for human rights....................................................... 34 3.2.2. Responses to human rights challenges ..................................... 35 3.3. The Concepts ........................................................................................ 37 3.3.1. Protection ...................................................................................... 37 3.3.2. Empowerment .............................................................................. 39 3.4. Protection and Empowerment in the DGBR .................................. 43 3.4.1. Minority organizations ................................................................ 45 3.4.2. Special institutions for minority protection ............................. 47 3.4.3. Evaluation of protection and empowerment in the DGBR .. 49 V Contents 3.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 56 4. Mapping national minority politics. Expert interviews concerning national minority participation in the DGBR ................................... 61 4.1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 61 4.2. Actors for minority participation in the DGBR .............................. 64 4.2.1. In Denmark ................................................................................... 66 4.2.2. In Germany ................................................................................... 69 4.3. Experts, elites and what they know ................................................... 71 4.3.1. Choosing interviewees due to their position ............................ 72 4.3.2. Choosing interviewees due to their knowledge ....................... 75 4.3.3. Elite interviewing .......................................................................... 77 4.3.3.1. Contacting the interviewees ................................................ 78 4.3.3.2. Conducting the interviews .................................................. 80 4.4. Analysis .................................................................................................. 83 4.5. Findings on minority politics in the DGBR ..................................... 88 4.5.1. Role model minority politics in the DGBR .............................. 88 4.5.2. Citizen contact .............................................................................. 93 4.5.3. Working relations ......................................................................... 96 4.5.3.1. National minority participation in Denmark .................... 96 4.5.3.2. National minority participation in Germany .................. 102 4.5.4. Important actors ......................................................................... 107 4.5.4.1. Concerning the Danish minority in Germany ............... 107 4.5.4.2. Concerning the German minority in Denmark ............. 108 4.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................... 110 5. My chancellor is in Berlin and my Queen in Copenhagen. National minority identity in the DGBR ........................................................ 117 5.1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 117 5.2. Identity of minorities whose reference point is a nation .............. 119 5.2.1. Identity ......................................................................................... 120 5.2.2. Minority........................................................................................ 123 5.2.3. Nationality ................................................................................... 125 5.3. Identities of national minorities in DGBR ..................................... 126 VI Contents 5.3.1. Literature review on national minority identity in the DGBR ...................................................................................................... 127 5.3.2. Interviewing elite national minority members (qualitative) . 132 5.3.2.1. Analysing expert interviews on minority identity .......... 138 5.3.2.2. Elements of minority identity elites in the DGBR ....... 143 5.3.3. Telephone survey amongst national minority members (quantitative) ............................................................................... 152 5.4. Assembling the minority identity puzzle ........................................ 156 6. I can’t talk to you right now, it’s harvest time. RDS-survey amongst national minorities in the DGBR .................................................... 161 6.1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 161 6.2. National minorities in the DGBR ................................................... 164 6.2.1. Contouring the status quo in the DGBR ............................... 165 6.2.2. Hard-to-reach populations in the DGBR .............................. 170 6.3. Past research and derived expectations ........................................... 172 6.4. Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) .............................................. 179 6.4.1. Implementing Respondent Driven Sampling ........................ 180 6.4.1.1. Formative Assessment ...................................................... 182 6.4.1.2. Seed Selection ..................................................................... 184 6.4.1.3. Network Sampling Procedure .......................................... 186 6.4.2. Analyzing Respondent Driven Sampling................................ 189 6.4.2.1. Personal network size ........................................................ 190 6.4.2.2. Convergence and Equilibrium ......................................... 192 6.4.2.3. Homophily .......................................................................... 193 6.5. Analysis ................................................................................................ 195 6.5.1. Socio demographics of RDS-populations in Germany and Denmark ...................................................................................... 195 6.5.2. Political interest representation in the DGBR ....................... 204 6.5.2.1. Best interest representation of the Danish minority in Germany .............................................................................. 205 VII Contents 6.5.2.2. Best interest representation of the German minority in Denmark .............................................................................. 211 6.5.2.3. Special institutions in the DGBR ..................................... 216 6.5.2.4. Concerning the German Secretariat in Copenhagen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Emerging Situation of Resistance to Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors in Pyrenophora Teres and Zymoseptoria Tritici in Europe
    Universität Hohenheim Institut für Phytomedizin Fachgebiet Phytopathologie Prof. Dr. Ralf T. Vögele Analysis of the emerging situation of resistance to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors in Pyrenophora teres and Zymoseptoria tritici in Europe Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Agrarwissenschaften vorgelegt der Fakultät Agrarwissenschaften von Dipl. Agr. Biol. Alexandra Rehfus aus Leonberg 2018 Diese Arbeit wurde unterstützt und finanziert durch die BASF SE, Unternehmensbereich Pflanzenschutz, Forschung Fungizide, Limburgerhof. Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde am 15.05.2017 von der Fakultät Agrarwissenschaften der Universität Hohenheim als „Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der agrarwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Hohenheim in Stuttgart“ angenommen. Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14.11.2017 1. Dekan: Prof. Dr. R. T. Vögele Berichterstatter, 1. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. R. T. Vögele Mitberichterstatter, 2. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. O. Spring 3. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Dr. C. P. W. Zebitz Leiter des Kolloquiums: Prof. Dr. J. Wünsche Table of contents III Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................. III Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... VII Figures ................................................................................................................. IX Tables .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southern Denmark the 2017 Danish Regional Elections And
    University of Southern Denmark The 2017 Danish regional elections and the victorious parliamentary parties Kjaer, Ulrik Published in: Regional and Federal Studies DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2019.1689492 Publication date: 2020 Document version: Accepted manuscript Citation for pulished version (APA): Kjaer, U. (2020). The 2017 Danish regional elections and the victorious parliamentary parties. Regional and Federal Studies, 30(3), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1689492 Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 The 2017 Danish regional elections and the victorious parliamentary parties Ulrik Kjaer, Dept of Political Studies, University of Southern Denmark ([email protected]) Manuscript accepted for publication in Regional & Federal Studies (vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 461-473. DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2019.1689492) ABSTRACT Regional politics is not at the center of most Danes’ political attention, but at the 2017 regional elections more than seven in ten Danes showed up at the polls to vote in the five Danish regions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DISCOVERY of the BALTIC the NORTHERN WORLD North Europe and the Baltic C
    THE DISCOVERY OF THE BALTIC THE NORTHERN WORLD North Europe and the Baltic c. 400-1700 AD Peoples, Economies and Cultures EDITORS Barbara Crawford (St. Andrews) David Kirby (London) Jon-Vidar Sigurdsson (Oslo) Ingvild Øye (Bergen) Richard W. Unger (Vancouver) Przemyslaw Urbanczyk (Warsaw) VOLUME 15 THE DISCOVERY OF THE BALTIC The Reception of a Catholic World-System in the European North (AD 1075-1225) BY NILS BLOMKVIST BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2005 On the cover: Knight sitting on a horse, chess piece from mid-13th century, found in Kalmar. SHM inv. nr 1304:1838:139. Neg. nr 345:29. Antikvarisk-topografiska arkivet, the National Heritage Board, Stockholm. Brill Academic Publishers has done its best to establish rights to use of the materials printed herein. Should any other party feel that its rights have been infringed we would be glad to take up contact with them. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Blomkvist, Nils. The discovery of the Baltic : the reception of a Catholic world-system in the European north (AD 1075-1225) / by Nils Blomkvist. p. cm. — (The northern world, ISSN 1569-1462 ; v. 15) Includes bibliographical references (p.) and index. ISBN 90-04-14122-7 1. Catholic Church—Baltic Sea Region—History. 2. Church history—Middle Ages, 600-1500. 3. Baltic Sea Region—Church history. I. Title. II. Series. BX1612.B34B56 2004 282’485—dc22 2004054598 ISSN 1569–1462 ISBN 90 04 14122 7 © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Rig44 Kuhl E.Qxd
    82 J Ø R G E N K Ü H L 83 N A T I O N A L M I N O R I T I E S A N D C R O S S - B O R D E R C O O P E R A T I O N B E T W E E N D E N M A R K A N D G E R M A N Y THE DANISH-GERMAN BORDER REGION AND ITS NATIONAL MINORITIES The Danish-German border region consists of the county (Amt) of This article introduces the case of the German-Danish experience on national minorities Sønderjylland in Denmark, and the city of Flensburg, and the districts of and cross-border cooperation in their borderlands. Firstly, the region will be characterized. Schleswig-Flensburg, Nordfriesland, and Rendsburg-Eckernförde located North Then the historical background and the present-day situation of the national Danish and of the River Eider in Germany. The German districts are part of the state of German minorities will be described. In the third section, the German-Danish experience Schleswig-Holstein within the Federal Republic of Germany. Up until 1864, most will be characterized and summed up in conclusive statements. Then, the development from minority regulations to cross-border cooperation will be characterised. Finally, the of this cross-border region formed an entity as the historical Danish duchy of 1 impact and relevance of the Schleswig experience to cross-boundary peace-building meas- Schleswig. Therefore, the Danish-German region in an international context usu- ures will be pointed out.
    [Show full text]
  • The De-Germanicising of English(1)
    THE DE-GERMANICISING OF ENGLISH(1) Paul Edmund DAVENPORT English is not an isolated tongue but a member of the Germanic languages, which are in turn members of the Indo-Europan language family. In this case, in saying that certain languages are 'members' of a language 'family', we mean that the said languages have a common origin. The so-called Germanic languages of today (principally English, Dutch, German, and the Scandinavian languages(5) have a common origin in an ancient, unrecorded language usually called Proto- Germanic. This Proto-Germanic, like Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and the ancient Celtic and Slavonic languages, evolved from a still more ancient language usually referred to as the Proto-Indo-European parent language. The common application in historical linguistics of such anthropological terms of kinship as 'parent' and 'family', as I have just used them, and 'ancestor', 'descendant' , 'sister' (as in 'English and German are sister languages') is quite relevant to the present discussion. Human offspring normally reproduce and thus continue some of the physical features and personality traits of their parents; at the same time an otherwise unique personality develops in each specimen, prompted by inherent tendencies and reactions to environmental influences. In language, of course, quite unlike the animal kingdom, the chain of connection between 'parent' and 'child' is one that evolves slowly and is broken only gradually. Still, when we look at Old English and modern English, or Latin and French, or Sanskrit and Hindi, it is easy to discern a convenient parallelism with the situation of human kinship in the phenomena of historically verifiable lineal connection, the continua- tion of certain characteristics (such as lexical items and various grammatical feat- ures), the development of apparently inherent tendencies (certain types of phono- logical and grammatical change), and environmental influences (the influence of Norse in the reduction of Old English inflections or the influence of French on the Middle English vocabulary, for example).
    [Show full text]
  • New Nordic Cuisine Best Restaurant in the World Bocuse D'or
    English // A culinary revolution highlighting local foods and combating uniform- ity has been enhancing the Taste of Denmark over the past decade. The perspec- tives of this trend are useful to everyone – in private households and catering kitchens alike. Nordic chefs use delicious tastes and environmental sustainability to combat unwholesome foods and obesity. www.denmarkspecial.dk At the same time, Danish designers continue to produce and develop furniture, tables and utensils which make any meal a holistic experience. Learn more about New Nordic Cuisine and be inspired by the ingredients, produce, restaurants and quality design for your dining experience. FOOD & DESIGN is a visual appetiser for what’s cooking in Denmark right now. Français // Une révolution culinaire axée sur les ingrédients locaux et opposée à une uniformisation a, ces 10 dernières années, remis au goût du jour les saveurs du Danemark. Cette évolution ouvre des perspectives à la disposition de tous – qu’il s’agisse de la cuisine privée ou de la cuisine à plus grande échelle. Les chefs nordiques mettent en avant les saveurs et l’environnement contre la mauvaise santé et le surpoids. Parallèlement, les designers danois ont maintenu et développé des meubles, tables et ustensiles qui font du repas une expérience d’ensemble agréable. Découvrez la nouvelle cuisine nordique et puisez l’inspiration pour vos repas dans les matières premières, les restaurants et le bon design. FOOD & DESIGN est une mise en bouche visuelle de ce qui se passe actuellement côté cuisine au Danemark. Food & Design is co-financed by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, The Trade Council What’s cooking in Denmark? New Nordic Cuisine Bocuse d’Or Playing among the stars Issue #9 2011 denmark Printed in Denmark EUR 10.00 // USD 13.00 Best restaurant special NZD 17.50 // AUD 13.50 ISBN No.
    [Show full text]
  • December 15, 1933
    \ EXAMS THE BREEZE XMAS VOL. XII HARRISONBURG, VIRGINIA, DECEMBER U, 1933 NUMBER 11 Columbus Lands at San Salvador Chief Ritzyolecuss Secretary Gives Out An Interview with Vaseo Da Gama Plans "America Discovered" Smokes Peace Pipe Facts for First Time Queen Isabel Trip to Planet Mars Shouts Whole Spain In Aerosuemarine With White Intruder About Magellan Trip My first impression of Queen When News Received Isabella as 1 knelt and kissed her hand Mr. Vasco da Gama, the world's New York, N. Y. October 15, 1452 The real facts concerning the voy- was that she was very tiny but very most famous discoverer of an all-water Madrid, Spain, Oct. 13, 1492— Special to Madrid Journal age of Magellan around the world have regal. Her flowing ermine-trimmed route to India, is now contemplating (AP)— Tons of ticker tape, whole With a great deal of trepidation and been revealed by a former secretary of robe cascaded in lovely folds around the salt sea voyage to the unknow jl§|(£~^Ut"" directories, and thou- uneasiness I entered the elevator this King Ferdinand in the following let- the feet of her ladies in waiting. Her planet called Mars. wriasTyr newspapers were hurled today morning to be carried to the penthouse ters. beautiful chestnut hair was curled in Many noted professors will accom- from every window upon the madly of Chief Ritzyolecuss, of the Bally- Letter to Magellan I from King a profusion of tiny ringlets to the pany Mr. da Gama on his voyage. chereing, stamping, milling crowd bel hoo tribe of Indians, inhabitants of the Ferdinand.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition
    Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 22 Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 22 Elliot Bulmer © 2021 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. Design and layout: International IDEA DOI: https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2021.67 ISBN: 978-91-7671-443-0 (PDF) Created with Booktype: <https://www.booktype.pro> Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2. What is the issue? .................................................................................................. 9 2.1. The principle: democracy and dialogue ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Relationship Between Legislators and Political Parties?
    Personalization of Representation: A New Relationship between Legislators and Political Parties? Marie Kaldahl Nielsen Personalization of Representation: A New Relationship between Legislators and Political Parties? PhD Dissertation Politica © Forlaget Politica and the author 2021 ISBN: 978-87-7335-276-2 Cover: Svend Siune Print: Fællestrykkeriet, Aarhus University Layout: Annette Bruun Andersen Submitted June 18, 2020 The public defense takes place May 7, 2021 Published April 2021 Forlaget Politica c/o Department of Political Science Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University Bartholins Allé 7 DK-8000 Aarhus C Denmark Table of Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................ 7 Preface ........................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 13 Chapter 2. State-of-the-art: situating the project in a blooming research agenda ... 17 Three conceptual distinctions ............................................................................... 17 Literature review of political personalization ....................................................... 21 Institutional personalization ................................................................................ 23 Government institutions ....................................................................................... 23 Personalization
    [Show full text]