DOCSLIB.ORG

Temperature Regimes, Growth, and Food Consumption for Female and Male Adult Walleye in Lake Huron and Lake Erie: a Bioenergetics Analysis Charles P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Temperature Regimes, Growth, and Food Consumption for Female and Male Adult Walleye in Lake Huron and Lake Erie: a Bioenergetics Analysis Charles P 1573 ARTICLE Temperature regimes, growth, and food consumption for female and male adult walleye in Lake Huron and Lake Erie: a bioenergetics analysis Charles P. Madenjian, Todd A. Hayden, Tyler B. Peat, Christopher S. Vandergoot, David G. Fielder, Ann Marie Gorman, Steven A. Pothoven, John M. Dettmers, Steven J. Cooke, Yingming Zhao, and Charles C. Krueger Abstract: Bioenergetics modeling was used to assess the relative importance of food availability and water temperature in determining walleye (Sander vitreus) growth. Temperature regimes experienced by both female and male adult walleye in three basins of Lake Huron and in Lake Erie were determined by use of surgically implanted temperature loggers and acoustic telemetry. Temperatures experienced by walleye were higher in Lake Erie than in Lake Huron. Walleye from Lake Erie grew at nearly double the rate of walleye from Lake Huron, and mass at age for adult females averaged about 50% greater than that for adult males in both lakes. Food consumption rate for an average adult walleye in Lake Erie was nearly twice as high as that in Lake Huron. Interbasin and interlake variability in temperature regimes accounted for a moderate degree of variability in walleye growth. We concluded that the driver for faster growth in Lake Erie compared with Lake Huron was higher food availability in Lake Erie compared with Lake Huron. The sex difference in temperature regimes explained 15% of the sex difference in Lake Erie walleye growth. Résumé : La modélisation de la bioénergétique a été utilisée pour évaluer l’importance relative de la disponibilité de nourriture et de la température de l’eau comme facteurs déterminants de la croissance des dorés jaunes (Sander vitreus). Les régimes thermiques auxquels sont exposés les dorés adultes femelles et mâles dans trois bassins du lac Huron et dans le lac Érié ont été déterminés en utilisant des enregistreurs de température implantés chirurgicalement et la télémétrie acoustique. Les tempéra- tures étaient plus élevées pour les dorés dans le lac Érié que pour ceux dans le lac Huron. Le taux de croissance des dorés du lac Érié était presque le double de celui des dorés du lac Huron, et le poids en fonction de l’âge pour les femelles adultes était en moyenne 50 % supérieur à celui des mâles adultes dans les deux lacs. Le taux de consommation de nourriture pour un doré adulte moyen dans le lac Érié était presque deux fois plus grand que dans le lac Huron. La variabilité des régimes thermiques entre bassins et entre lacs explique un degré modéré de variabilité de la croissance des dorés. Nous concluons que le facteur expliquant For personal use only. la croissance plus rapide dans le lac Érié que dans lac Huron est une plus grande disponibilité de nourriture dans le lac Érié. La différence entre les sexes sur le plan des régimes thermiques explique 15 % de la différence entre les sexes sur le plan de la croissance des dorés du lac Érié. [Traduit par la Rédaction] Introduction 1992; Jobling 1994; Quinn and Deriso 1999; Enberg et al. 2008). Thus, if the rate of food consumption is identical in two aquatic For a given species of fish, individual-level growth of fish is a ecosystems, and other factors affecting growth other than water function of food availability and the temperature regime experi- temperature are also identical across the two ecosystems, then enced by the fish (Hewett and Johnson 1992; Jobling 1994; Quinn fish growth would be expected to be faster in the aquatic ecosys- and Deriso 1999; Enberg et al. 2008). Food availability is a complex tem with the lower temperatures experienced by fish compared function of several factors, including prey abundance, prey size, with fish growth in the other aquatic ecosystem, owing to higher and handling times (Werner 1974; Persson and Greenberg 1990; metabolic costs in the warmer ecosystem (Hewett and Johnson Rennie and Venturelli 2015). Typically, metabolic costs for the fish 1992; Kao et al. 2015a, 2015b). increase with increasing water temperature, and metabolic costs Bioenergetics modeling has proven invaluable in assessing the represent a substantial energy loss for fish (Hewett and Johnson effects of various factors, including temperature regime, on fish Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by USGS LIBRARY on 09/27/18 Received 7 July 2017. Accepted 30 November 2017. C.P. Madenjian. US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. T.A. Hayden. Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hammond Bay Biological Station, 11188 Ray Road Millersburg, MI 49759, USA. T.B. Peat and S.J. Cooke. Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada. C.S. Vandergoot. US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Erie Biological Station, Sandusky, OH 44870, USA. D.G. Fielder. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lake Huron Research Station, 160 Fletcher Street, Alpena, MI 49707, USA. A. Gorman. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Fairport Harbor Fisheries Research Station, 1190 High Street, Fairport Harbor, OH 44077, USA. S.A. Pothoven. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Lake Michigan Field Station, 1431 Beach Street, Muskegon, MI 49441, USA. J.M. Dettmers. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, 2100 Commonwealth Boulevard, Suite 100, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. Y. Zhao. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section, Lake Erie Fisheries Station, 320 Milo Road, Wheatley, ON N0P 2P0, Canada. C.C. Krueger. Michigan State University, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, 1405 South Harrison Road, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA. Corresponding author: Charles P. Madenjian (email: [email protected]). Copyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 75: 1573–1586 (2018) dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0280 Published at www.nrcresearchpress.com/cjfas on 6 December 2017. 1574 Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol. 75, 2018 growth (Chipps and Wahl 2008; Madenjian 2011; Deslauriers et al. reside in either the northern main basin or the southern main 2017). A fish bioenergetics model represents an energy budget for basin (Hayden et al. 2014). Walleye remaining in Saginaw Bay are a fish. Energy input via food consumption is equal to metabolic expected to experience warmer temperatures than those walleye losses, waste losses, and growth: out-migrating to the main basin, while food availability for wall- eye is presumably higher in Saginaw Bay than in the main basin C ϭ (R ϩ A ϩ SDA) ϩ (F ϩ U) ϩ G (Fielder et al. 2014; Hayden et al. 2014; Peat et al. 2015). The primary goals of our study were to compare walleye growth where C = consumption, R = standard metabolism, A = energy in Lake Huron with walleye growth in Lake Erie and to assess the expenditure due to activity, SDA = specific dynamic action (energy relative importance of food availability and temperature regime required to digest food), F = egestion, U = excretion, and G = growth. as determinants of walleye growth in the Lake Huron – Lake Erie Standard metabolism is typically modeled as an exponential func- system. A secondary goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of tion of water temperature. Bioenergetics model applications to sex differences in temperature regimes on sex differences in wall- evaluate the effects of various factors on fish growth are well eye growth. Specific objectives included (i) using temperature illustrated in the study by Hayward and Margraf (1987), who used loggers and acoustic telemetry to determine temperatures expe- bioenergetics modeling to show that faster growth of yellow rienced by female and male walleye in Saginaw Bay, the northern perch (Perca flavescens) in the central basin of Lake Erie compared main basin of Lake Huron, the southern main basin of Lake Hu- with the western basin of Lake Erie was due to an interbasin differ- ron, and Lake Erie, (ii) developing growth trajectories for female ence in food availability rather than an interbasin difference in tem- and male walleye in both Lake Huron and Lake Erie and then perature regime. compare growth between the two lakes, (iii) using bioenergetics Coupling archival temperature tag technology with acoustic modeling to estimate food consumption by female and male wall- telemetry has recently enabled researchers to record thermal his- eye in Saginaw Bay, northern main basin of Lake Huron, southern tories of fish within different basins of the same lake, as well as main basin of Lake Huron, and Lake Erie, (iv) using a bioenergetics within lakes connected by waterways (Cooke et al. 2013; Hayden modeling framework to exchange temperature regimes experienced et al. 2014; Peat et al. 2015). By constructing an appropriate acous- by walleye between basins and lakes to assess the effects of interba- tic receiver network, interbasin and (or) interlake movement of sin and interlake variability in temperature regimes experienced by fish can be detected. Implanting both an acoustic transmitter and walleye on walleye growth, and (v) again using a bioenergetics mod- an archival temperature tag in each fish, and subsequent moni- eling framework to exchange temperature regimes experienced toring of any interbasin and interlake movements of the fish us- by walleye between the sexes to evaluate the effect of sex differ- ing acoustic telemetry, can be used by researchers to determine ences in temperature regimes on sex differences in walleye temperature regimes experienced by fish while confined to a spe- growth. cific basin or lake. Materials and methods To date, the effects of both interbasin and interlake variability in temperatures experienced by fish on fish growth in a two-lake sys- Field methods tem, with a connecting waterway between the two lakes, have not Walleye in this study were captured and tagged as part of a large been investigated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Limnology of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
    PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON ALFRED M. BEETON U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan STANFORD H. SMITH U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan and FRANK H. HOOPER Institute for Fisheries Research Michigan Department of Conservation Ann Arbor, Michigan GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 GREEN ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER, 1967 PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON1 Alfred M. Beeton, 2 Stanford H. Smith, and Frank F. Hooper3 ABSTRACT Water temperature and the distribution of various chemicals measured during surveys from June 7 to October 30, 1956, reflect a highly variable and rapidly changing circulation in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. The circula- tion is influenced strongly by local winds and by the stronger circulation of Lake Huron which frequently causes injections of lake water to the inner extremity of the bay. The circulation patterns determined at six times during 1956 reflect the general characteristics of a marine estuary of the northern hemisphere. The prevailing circulation was counterclockwise; the higher concentrations of solutes from the Saginaw River tended to flow and enter Lake Huron along the south shore; water from Lake Huron entered the northeast section of the bay and had a dominant influence on the water along the north shore of the bay. The concentrations of major ions varied little with depth, but a decrease from the inner bay toward Lake Huron reflected the dilution of Saginaw River water as it moved out of the bay. Concentrations in the outer bay were not much greater than in Lake Huronproper.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 6 MAY 2014 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF Mr. Roger Eberhardt Acting Deputy Director, Office of the Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7773 Dear Roger: Thank you for your February 6, 2014, request to remove the "Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat" Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) from the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern (AOC) in Michigan, As you know, we share your desire to restore all of the Great Lakes AOCs and to formally delist them. Based upon a review of your submittal and the supporting data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your BUI removal request for the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, EPA will notify the International Joint Commission of this significant positive environmental change at this AOC. We congratulate you and your staff, as well as the many federal, state, and local partners who have worked so hard and been instrumental in achieving this important environmental improvement. Removal of this BUI will benefit not only the people who live and work in the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, but all the residents of Michigan and the Great Lakes basin as well. We look forward to the continuation of this important and productive relationship with your agency and the local coordinating committee as we work together to fully restore all of Michigan's AOCs. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (312) 353-4891, or your staff may contact John Perrecone, at (312) 353-1149.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station, 1966 - 2003
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES History of the Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station, 1966 - 2003 Mike Thomas, Research Biologist (retired) and Todd Wills, Area Station Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] The Lake St. Clair Great Lakes Station was constructed on a confined dredge disposal site at the mouth of the Clinton River and opened for business in 1974. In this photo, the Great Lakes Station (red roof) is visible in the background behind the lighter colored Macomb County Sheriff Marine Division Office. Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station Website: http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7-153-10364_52259_10951_11304---,00.html FISHERIES DIVISION LSCFRS History - 1 History of the Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station, 1966-2003 Preface: the other “old” guys at the station. It is my From 1992 to 2016, it was my privilege to hope that this “report” will be updated serve as a fisheries research biologist at the periodically by Station crew members who Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station have an interest in making sure that the (LSCFRS). During my time at the station, I past isn’t forgotten. – Mike Thomas learned that there was a rich history of fisheries research and assessment work The Beginning - 1966-1971: that was largely undocumented by the By 1960, Great Lakes fish populations and standard reports or scientific journal the fisheries they supported had been publications. This history, often referred to decimated by degraded habitat, invasive as “institutional memory”, existed mainly in species, and commercial overfishing. The the memories of station employees, in invasive alewife was overabundant and vessel logs, in old 35mm slides and prints, massive die-offs ruined Michigan beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands
    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
    [Show full text]
  • SAGINAW BAY Multiple Stressors Summary Report
    NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL-160 SAGINAW BAY Multiple Stressors Summary Report Craig Stow1 and Tomas Hook2, Editors Project Team: Dmitry Beletsky Michael D. Kaplowitz Raisa Beletsky William Keiper Ashley Burtner Peter J. Lavrentyev James H. Bredin Frank Lupi Joann Cavaletto David F. Millie Yoonkyung Cha Nancy Morehead Carlo De Marchi Thomas F. Nalepa Joseph V. DePinto Tammy J. Newcomb Julianne Dyble Danna Palladino Dave Fanslow Scott D. Peacor Steve Francoeur Steven A. Pothoven Duane Gossiaux Todd Redder Nathan Hawley Michelle Selzer Chansheng He Henry A. Vanderploeg Thomas H. Johengen Ed Verhamme Donna R. Kashian Kim Winslow 1NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 2Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907 September 2013 ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D UNITED STATES NATIONAL OCEANIC AND A M E I C N O I S L T DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S Penny Pritzker C Kathy Sullivan .D R E E PA M RT OM MENT OF C Secretary Acting, Under Secretary for Oceans & Atmosphere NOAA Administrator NOTICE Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by the NOAA. Use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the tests of such products for publicity or advertising purposes is not authorized. This is GLERL Contribution No. 1684. This publication is available as a PDF file and can be downloaded from GLERL’s web site: www.glerl.noaa.gov. Hard copies can be requested from GLERL Information Services, 4840 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw Bay Watershed Conservation Partnership
    SAGINAW BAY WATERSHED CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP Regional Conservation Partnership Program Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed he Regional Conservation Partnership Program Why Saginaw Bay? (RCPP) is being implemented by the United The Saginaw Bay watershed is the largest in the state of TStates Department of Agriculture (USDA) under Michigan, spanning 5.5 million acres and 22 counties. the 2014 Farm Bill. The RCPP makes $1.2 billion in The ecological health of Saginaw Bay and its tributaries federal funding available over 10 years to address critical is critically important to not only Lake Huron, but the conservation concerns across the country. Already, the entire Great Lakes ecosystem, supporting a diversity of Saginaw Bay Watershed Conservation Partnership, fish, migratory birds and other wildlife. It has the largest co-led by The Nature Conservancy and the Michigan concentration of coastal wetlands in the Lake Huron Agri-Business Association, is earning national attention Basin and serves as Lake Huron’s most important source and is considered by the USDA, U.S. Secretary of for several fish species, including walleye, and is home to Agriculture Tom Vilsack and others as an innovative way some of Michigan’s most productive farmland. With to address water quality resource concerns. The Saginaw agricultural use covering 45 percent of the watershed’s Bay Watershed Conservation Partnership will provide a land area, it is crucial that we understand how to total investment of $20 million, including $8 million in properly manage this land to balance agronomic and direct financial assistance and $12 million in technical environmental needs. assistance, to growers in the watershed to implement conservation practices intended to improve water quality for both people and nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus Artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes
    Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes General In the Great Lakes Basin, a number of tools are available to manage Cisco stocks including restoration when populations are depleted. Active tools that have Been used include harvest regulations, habitat protection and enhancement, and population enhancement and re-introduction via stocking. Cisco management in each lake is the purview of individual jurisdictions. Regulation of commercial and recreational fisheries in the Great Lakes is under the authority of eight individual U. S. states, the Canadian province of Ontario (Fig.1), and triBal governments. In the United States Great Lakes, three intertribal organizations regulate treaty-based harvest on ceded lands and water beyond the reservations: the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, the Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority and the 1854 Treaty Authority (CORA 2000, Kappen et al 2012). Four treaties reserve triBal fishing rights including suBsistence fishery in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. In the Canadian Great Lakes, the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Licences Regulations provides communal fishing licenses as a management tool for Aboriginal fisheries, which are found on all lakes except Lake Erie. This fact sheet summarizes cisco management for each lake excluding harvest regulations for tribal fisheries which are not aligned with one lake (Fig. 2). Figure 1. Great Lakes bordering states (GLIN.net) 1 Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes Figure 2 .Treaty-ceded waters in the Great Lakes with tribal fishing rights reaffirmed based on 1836, 1842, and 1854 treaties between Native American tribes and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan
    The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan What is a Watershed? Did you know that everywhere you are, you’re within a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that contains a common set of streams, rivers and lakes that all drain into a larger waterbody. Watershed boundaries follow natural features of the landscape, such as a ridgeline or a height-of-land (see diagram at right). Watersheds include both the water features within the area, as well as the land surrounding those water bodies. As a result of the connected nature of a watershed, all activities on the land and water can affect the condition of the larger watershed. A watershed can be divided into progressively smaller watersheds, which are often referred to as subswatersheds. For example, the Klacking Creek Watershed is one of many subwatersheds that can be identified within the larger Rifle River Watershed. Likewise, the Rifle River Watershed itself is part of the larger Lake Huron Watershed. Watershed diagram: www.upperdesplainsriver.org Huron Pines is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization and an equal opportunity provider. Our dynamic staff of ecologists, geographers, biologists and environmental educators think big and act quickly to ensure that Northeast Michigan’s watersheds and wild places will stay healthy and resilient for future generations. Located right in the center of the Great Lakes system, we have the unique privilege and responsibility to protect our treasured lands teeming with wildlife, and to sustain the world’s most important source of fresh water. Learn more at
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw Bay Lake Plain and Headwaters Focus Area Focal Species Mallard, Bobolink, Lake Sturgeon and Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid Jim Hudgins, USFWS Robert H
    Michigan Saginaw Bay Lake Plain and Headwaters Focus Area Focal Species Mallard, Bobolink, Lake Sturgeon and Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid Jim Hudgins, USFWS Robert H. Pos Jim Hudgins, USFWS Rachel Maranto, MNA Strategic Habitat Conservation Conservation Planning and UMRGLR JV Implementation Plan, Shiawassee NWR CCP, Great Lakes Design Tools: Watershed Mgt. Tool, Lake Huron Biodiversity Strategy, Saginaw Bay CISMA Strategic Plan, Upper Midwest Great Lakes LCC Strategic Plan Conservation Delivery: Wetland restoration and enhancement, Great Lakes coastal marsh restoration, grassland/prairie restoration/establishment, early successional forest management, fish habitat and passage Conservation Partners: Michigan DNR, Ducks Unlimited, The Nature Conservancy, Michigan Nature Association, Saginaw Basin Land Conservancy, Little Forks Conservancy, local governments and universities, Saginaw Bay RC&D Comprehensive Partnerships Include Initiatives Focus Area Five-Year Targets Partnership for Saginaw Bay Monarch Initiative Wetland Restoration/ Enhancement/Coastal Marsh: Great Lakes Saginaw Bay Cooperative 200 acres Invasive Species Mgt. Area Restoration Initiative Upland Restoration/ Michigan NAWCA Saginaw Bay Coastal Enhancement: 150 acres Initiative Partnership Fish Habitat: 15 sites Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Michigan Pheasant LCD Restoration Initiative Fish Passage: 1 Great Lakes barrier Saginaw Bay WIN Schoolyard Habitat Saginaw Bay Regional Urban Wildlife Conservation Partnership Conservation Program Program (Urban Refuge) Upper Midwest Great Lakes LCC Saginaw Bay to Lake Erie NAWCA Partnership 62 63 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program Midwest Region Strategic Work Plan prairie fringed orchid. Finally, the area also has untapped potential, particularly in the northern portion, to setback forest succession to benefit the American woodcock and golden- winged warbler. In addition to providing fish and wildlife benefits, the Saginaw Bay area provides many benefits to the local citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Study 470.Pdf
    STUDY FINAL REPORT State: Michigan Project No.: F-81-R-1 Study No.: 470 Title: Great Lakes zooplankton populations near historical and potential walleye spawning rivers Period Covered: October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 Study Objective:. To describe Great Lakes macro-zooplankton populations during spring and early summer in the vicinity of major tributaries (i.e., potential walleye spawning grounds). To learn whether food availability during various walleye fry stages is important to survival and recruitment to the adult walleye population. Summary: Recent walleye catch per effort data were gathered from various sources for Lake Erie, Lake St. Clair, and Saginaw Bay and used to supplement my inventory of walleye year class strengths. Catch data from 1978-2000 were used to rank year classes in each body of water. Four sources of Lake Erie catch data were used and there was very good agreement between them. Angler diary data obtained from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) were used to estimate year class strength in Lake St. Clair. Angler harvest data and age samples from gill nets and electrofishing on Saginaw River spawning grounds, all collected by MDNR, were used to estimate year class strength in Saginaw Bay. There was moderate similarity in year class ranks between Saginaw Bay and Lake St. Clair but Lake Erie was very different with the exception of the very poor 1992 year class. Job 5. Title: Analyze walleye age/year class data. Findings: Historical walleye year class strength was estimated from catch data for Lake Erie, Lake St.
    [Show full text]