DOCSLIB.ORG

Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? “The upheavals that have taken place in Kyrgyzstan indirectly allow us to speak about the existence of regularities – the desire from democratic transformations, as a rule, slide down to authoritarian encroachments,” mentioned researcher and analyst Konstantin Larionov, in an article written specifically for CABAR.asia. Follow us on LinkedIn In the events of 2005, 2010, and 2020, the coming opposition united completely different political forces. Kyrgyzstan is experiencing the consequences of the third coup, which, like the previous ones, was accompanied by the removal of the president, as well as the resignation of the government. There are common features and common internal logic between the past coups. If in 2005 the “tulip revolution” was well planned and organized by the opposition forces (which included Bakiev, Otunbaeva, Sariev, Atambayev, Tekebaev, Beknazarov), then the events of 2010 and 2020 took place much more spontaneously and unpredictably. In addition, the events of October 2020 contributed to the seizure of power by the most enterprising political actors. Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? In the events of 2005, 2010, and 2020, the coming opposition united completely different political forces. This ultimately led to the fact that the goals of “revolutions” were usually not achieved, because immediately after the protesters seized the White House, the leaders of the protests began to engage in the redistribution of resources. The upheavals that have taken place indirectly allow us to speak of the existence of regularities: the desire from democratic transformations, as a rule, slide down to authoritarian encroachments. At the same time, the increasing usurpation, until recently, was liquidated through a coup – the only effective way to rotate political elites. Economic negative consequences In Kyrgyzstan, an unfavorable economic situation affects social and political stability. It certainly got worse due to revolutions. Since the beginning of independence, there has been a decline in industrial production and GDP (in 1994, GDP fell to -20.1%, and in 2021 there was the most significant drop among the CIS countries – by 8.1%), an increase in the price of consumer goods, a devaluation of the national currency, mass emigration, a high level of corruption, growing external debt, violation or disregard of laws by the authorities – all these are the main problems that existed earlier and are present now, which have not yet been resolved. Kyrgyzstan, together with Tajikistan, appeared to be the poorest in the post-Soviet space. The economic situation of the country with a crumbling branch of heavy industry rolled its development back into the pre-industrial period. Only by the beginning of 2000, the official number of unemployed and people living below the poverty line began to decline gradually. In this vein, in 2005, according to the data of the National Statistical Committee, there were 184 thousand unemployed, in 2006 – 198 thousand, in 2010 – already 204 thousand, in 2011 – 212 thousand people. In 2019, 162.7 thousand were classified as non-working (or 6.2% of the economically active population of the country). However, after the state of emergency introduced by the authorities in the spring of 2020, the number of unemployed began to reach approximately 700 thousand people. In addition, the socio-economic situation began to deteriorate after the return of a large number of labor migrants who were left without work in other states. The rise in prices was especially painful after April 2010, as well as at the end of 2020. According to international experts, in the south of Kyrgyzstan, after the tragic events Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? in the summer of 2010, there were signs of a humanitarian catastrophe.[1] In 2011, according to a study carried out by experts from the United Nations World Food Program at that time, approximately 1.4 million people experienced a lack of food and about 2 million more people were consuming poor-quality food.[2] In 2020, after the coup in the country, prices also quickly crept up and continue to rise even in February 2021. Of course, the most important factor was the introduction of a state of emergency and the closure of borders. However, the coup also had its negative impact on food prices. The government headed by the former acting Prime Minister Artem Novikov had to admit that it was not coping with the current situation. Former Minister of Agriculture Tilek Toktogaziev mentioned that despite the ban on the export of meat to neighboring countries, large-scale smuggling is rampant. He also pointed out that there are three to five months of stocks left in the country for certain food products. Some experts believe that the Kyrgyz Republic, having chosen the wrong model of economic development (a kind of shock therapy, where the government’s intervention in the economy still remained), contributed to the destruction of the economic potential, which affected its further development. Enterprises and practically all industrial potential were destroyed and, in principle, was not capable of full-scale competition with foreign companies, and the economy was increasingly focused on the transit of goods from China. In addition, the service sector, light, and mining industries developed, and a fairly high level of labor migration remained. Migration As a result of mass migration and brain drain, the country was losing not only human capital, but also deprived of those resources that, with purposeful strategic management, could serve for the development of the state. After each coup, processes of internal migration are observed, when residents from different regions began to move massively, hoping to improve their socio-economic situation. A reflection of such movements was the development of the so-called adobe belt (саманный пояс) – illegally created new buildings around the capital city, which create an issue for the authorities of the capital and the nearby local self-government bodies. Self-seizure of land also affected the appearance of the capital, contributing to the spread of chaotic buildings, increasing the problems of municipal authorities. Uncontrolled migration, accompanied by violation of laws as one of the aspects of interethnic communications, poses a threat to the Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? security of Kyrgyzstan. Typical example of chaotically inhabited residential area around Bishkek. With the first wave of external migration in the 1990s, it can be argued that it was mainly part of the Russian-speaking population and other ethnic groups who migrated, who are beginning to be perceived as minorities. As a result of the events of March 24, 2005, the flow of external migration outside the country increases again. After 2010, the number of migrants increased again, but now mostly from the southern regions of the country. The departure of the population from Osh, Batken and Jalal-Abad regions is due to the deteriorating interethnic, economic, and criminal situation. It is no secret that at the end of 2020, a large number of the population has a “relocation vibe”. With the opening of borders in the spring or summer of 2021, the country will face an outflow of population. On the one hand, this will reduce the burden of the employment market, but on the other hand, it will contribute to the drainage of the economy. Investment climate Why to Consider the Negative Consequences of the Overpast Revolutions in Kyrgyzstan? The coups that took place reduced the investment attractiveness of Kyrgyzstan. During this period, the unstable situation affected the decrease in the purchasing power of the population, as well as the safety of the investors themselves. In the rating of investment attractiveness (Doing Business)[3] Kyrgyzstan did not pose the best ranking: in 2006 – 84 place, in 2010 the country rises to 41, 2011 goes down to 44, in 2019 it slides down to 70, and in 2020 (data for October) – already in 80 out of 190 countries. Analytical business publications have repeatedly noted that until the authorities enter the legal space, external investors will not seek to invest in the country’s economy. As a result, the situation is such that the sector of short-term foreign investments is mainly developing in the country. Few people risk investing in long-term projects. This led to the fact that lenders began to raise interest rates in the future, which imposes an additional burden on the country’s budget. Businesses are much more interested in investing in the economies of other developing countries. Along with the decline in investment attractiveness, there is also flight of funds. Businesses are much more interested in investing in the economies of other developing countries. Flight of funds can be observed by official figures: so, if in 2017, 724 million USD was withdrawn from the country, in 2018 – 708, then in 9 months 719 million USD was withdrawn from the country. It should also be recalled that in the first days of October 2020, the work of the SWIFT payment system was suspended in order to avoid a situation of capital withdrawal from the country. Such actions may indeed be perceived ambiguously in business circles around the world. Going beyond the legal framework Every coup in the country is leading to a way out of the constitutional framework. They led to short-term management collapse, the destruction of the public administration system and a decrease in its effectiveness. A distinctive feature of the two previous coups (2005 and 2010) was the desire of the new government to return to the legal framework as soon as possible. The coup that took place after October 5, 2020 demonstrates the disregard for the law by political forces.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elections and Identity Politics in Kyrgyzstan 1989-2009 - Moving Beyond the ‘Clan Politics’ Hypothesis
    LSE ELECTIONS AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN KYRGYZSTAN 1989-2009 - MOVING BEYOND THE ‘CLAN POLITICS’ HYPOTHESIS Fredrik M Sjoberg Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science London July 2009 Final version: 01/12/2009 11:49 UMI Number: U615307 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615307 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. Fredrik M Sjoberg 2 Abstract This dissertation examines the emergence of political pluralism in the unlikely case of Kyrgyzstan.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Ethnic Tension in Kyrgyzstan.Pdf
    ADDRESSING ETHNIC TENSION IN KYRGYZSTAN HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 22, 2011 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 112–1–6] ( Available via http://www.csce.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 95–719 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland, Chairman Co-Chairman JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama TOM UDALL, New Mexico PHIL GINGREY, Georgia JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia New York MARCO RUBIO, Florida MIKE McINTYRE, North Carolina KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire STEVE COHEN, Tennessee EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL H. POSNER, Department of State MICHAEL C. CAMUN˜ EZ, Department of Commerce ALEXANDER VERSHBOW, Department of Defense [II] ADDRESSING ETHNIC TENSION IN KYRGYZSTAN JUNE 22, 2011 COMMISSIONERS Page Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe .............................................. 1 Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Co-Chairman, Commission on Se- curity and Cooperation in Europe .......................................... 10 MEMBER Hon. Trent Franks (R–8), a Member of Congress from the State of Arizona ....................................................................... 14 WITNESSES Dr. Kimmo Kiljunen, Chairperson, Independent Inter- national Commission of Inquiry into the Events in South- ern Kyrgyzstan in June 2010 ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • With a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
    A Strategic Conflict Analysis of Central Asia With a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Niklas L.P. SwanstrSwanströmöm Svante E. Cornell Anara Tabyshalieva June 2005 A Conflict and Security Analysis of Central Asia with a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Niklas L.P. Swanström Svante E. Cornell Anara Tabyshalieva Prepared for the Swedish Development Cooperation Agency June 1, 2005 A Strategic Conflict Analysis of Central Asia 1 Strategic Conflict Analysis of Central Asia with a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan .... 1 1. General Security and Conflict Situation in Central Asia................................................... 1 1.1. General conflict development........................................................................................................2 1.1.1. Multilateral security arrangements..................................................................................................3 1.1.2. Conflict management, resolution and conflict prevention...................................................................4 1.1.3. Major changes 2002-2005, summarily..........................................................................................5 1.2. Conflict lines in Central Asia..........................................................................................................5 1.2.1 Ethnicity and Border Issues............................................................................................................6 1.2.2 Regionalism....................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Slavica Iaponica No 16
    Preface The Slavic Research Center (SRC) of Hokkaido University held an international symposium entitled “Eager Eyes Fixed on Slavic Eurasia: Change and Progress” in Sapporo, Japan, on July 6 and 7 of 2006. The symposium was mainly funded by a special scientific research grant from the Japanese Ministry of Education’s Twenty-first Century Center of Excellence Program (“Making a Discipline of Slavic Eurasian Studies: 2003–2008,” project leader, Ieda Osamu) and partly assisted by Grants-in- Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (“An Emerging New Eurasian Order: Russia, China and Its Interactions toward its Neighbors: 2006–2009,” project leader, Iwashita Akihiro). The symposium started with an opening speech, Martha Brill Olcott’s “Eyes on Central Asia: How To Understand the Winners and Losers.” The aim of the symposium was to redefine the former Soviet space in international relations, paying closest attention to the “surrounding regions” of Eurasia. Well-known specialists on the region came together in Sapporo to debate topics such as “Russian Foreign Policy Reconsidered,” “South Asia and Eurasia,” “Central Asia and Eurasian Cooperation,” “Challenges of the Sino-Russian Border,” and “Russia in East Asia.” All of the sessions noted China’s presence in the region. Central Asian issues and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization were mentioned in the sessions on South Asia and East Asia. Every participant recognized the crucial importance of increasing interactions in and around Eurasia. Eighteen papers were submitted to the symposium: four from Japan, three from China, two each from Russia and the United States, and one each from Korea, Hungary, India, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • VULNERABLE to MANIPULATION Interviews with Migrant Youth and Youth Remittance-Recipients in the Kyrgyz Republic MAY 2016
    Photo: Timothy Harris VULNERABLE TO MANIPULATION Interviews with Migrant Youth and Youth Remittance-Recipients in the Kyrgyz Republic MAY 2016 Executive Summary Research conducted by Mercy Corps and Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI) in Kyrgyzstan1 reveals a number of risk factors related to violence that exist within the studied youth population of southern Kyrgyzstan. This research was conducted between March and May 2016 in the southern provinces of Osh, Jalalabad, Batken, and in the northern province of Issyk-Kul. In 2010, southern Kyrgyzstan saw an outbreak of violence between ethnic Kyrgyz and ethnic Uzbek citizens. Known locally as the Osh Events, this violence resulted in mass casualties, displacement and destruction of physical infrastructure in the South. In addition, southern Kyrgyzstan is a known origin of people migrating to Syria to join Jabhat al-Nusra or the so-called Islamic State, with official figures citing fewer than 500 people from Kyrgyzstan.2 While this research did not specifically seek out people who migrated to join the fight in the Middle East, some respondents were directly aware of neighbors, friends, acquaintances or people from their communities who had gone. Issyk-Kul was selected as a comparator province for this study due to its multi-ethnic composition and lack of conflict history. Kyrgyzstan is characterized by a young, rapidly expanding population, high levels of rural poverty, insufficient domestic jobs for working-age people, and a high dependence on Russia as a source of remittances. The precipitous reduction in remittances from Russia due to contractions in the Russian economy in the last two years and changes in the ruble/som exchange rate have spurred questions about the population’s vulnerability to destabilization or recruitment to jihadi organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changed Position of Ethnic Russians and Uzbeks
    KYRGYZ LEADERSHIP AND ETHNOPOLITICS BEFORE AND AFTER THE TULIP REVOLUTION: THE CHANGED POSITION OF ETHNIC RUSSIANS AND UZBEKS By Munara Omuralieva Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Supervisor: Professor Matteo Fumagalli CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 Abstract The Soviet Union’s multi-ethnic legacy in the Central Asian region, particularly in Kyrgyzstan was a crucial factor that largely impacted its post-independence state consolidation and transition. Especially the nation-building became difficult due to the ethnic heterogeneity of its population. More recently in 2005 there was the “Tulip Revolution”, basically an overthrow of the northern president by the southern clan leader. Despite the fact that the system and character of the government and of any other governmental structures did not change following the so- called Kyrgyz “Tulip Revolution”, there have been observations of the dramatic changes for the worse in the position of ethnic minorities, more specifically Russians and Uzbeks, and their relation with the titular nation. This work uses interviews and media material in order to demonstrate how the elite change has caused the changes analyzed in the thesis. The findings of the research demonstrate that the elite change, which was a result of 2005 events, is the main factor that has caused negative shifts in the political representation, ethnic organizations becoming more active and politicized, official policies taking more nationalistic tones, and in deteriorated inter-ethnic relations. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgements I want to express deep appreciation to my supervisor Professor Matteo Fumagalli for his useful comments and suggestions throughout the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Us and Russian Policy Toward Central Asia in the Framework of the Geopolitical Theory
    EURASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, Eurasian ERJ, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 55-68, July 2020 Research Journal July 2020 ISSN 2519-2442, KAZAKHSTAN Vol. 2, No. 2 Research Article THE US AND RUSSIAN POLICY TOWARD CENTRAL ASIA IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE GEOPOLITICAL THEORY Zhuldyz KANAPIYANOVA 1 1 Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Turkey; e-mail: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-2992-7390 Received: 01.11.2019 Accepted: 22.01.2020 ABSTRACT Central Asia (CA) has a large geostrategic and geopolitical importance due to its central location in Eurasia and its rich energy resources in the Caspian region. After the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), establishment of new independent states in the region increased the interest of great powers in the region. The influence of the Russian Federation (RF) in the region has continued after the collapse of the USSR as it was during the time of the USSR. After the collapse of the USSR, superpowers like United States of America (USA) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) began to establish their presence in the region in order to balance the Russian policy in the region. The interest of the USA in CA countries in early years of independence was seen in areas of economic aid and energy, while the influence of Russia has continued intensively in the political, economic, energy, and military fields. In this context, the USA and the Russia have entered into a competition to gain more military influence and space in the region. This study analyzes the effectiveness of the strategies applied by the US and Russia towards Central Asia within the framework of geopolitical theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Denuclearization of Central Asia Jozef Goldblat
    It should be noted that the articles contained in Disarmament Forum are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. The names and designations of countries, territories, cities and areas employed in Disarmament Forum do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.07-02732—November 2007 —4,200 UNIDIR/DF/2007/4 ISSN 1020-7287 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor's Note Kerstin VIGNARD ....................................................................................................... 1 Central Asia at the Crossroads Strategic concerns in Central Asia Martha BRILL OLCOTT ............................................................................................... 3 Central Asia: regional security and WMD proliferation threats Togzhan KASSENOVA ................................................................................................. 13 Denuclearization of Central Asia Jozef GOLDBLAT ........................................................................................................ 25 Risks to security in Central Asia: an assessment from a small arms perspective Christina WILLE .......................................................................................................... 33 The governance of Central Asian waters: national interests versus regional cooperation Jeremy ALLOUCHE ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Framework for Managing and Accessing Climate Finance in the Kyrgyz Republic
    Public Disclosure Authorized Government of the Kyrgyz Republic Climate Investment Programme Public Disclosure Authorized Operational Framework for Managing and Accessing Climate Finance in the Kyrgyz Republic Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL DOCUMENT Public Disclosure Authorized May 2018 Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank AE Accredited Entity (to the Green Climate Fund) AF Adaptation Fund BAU Business as usual CAPS Central Asia Power System CAIAG Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences CNK Climate Network of Kyrgyzstan CCC Climate Change Centre CCCCP Coordination Commission on Climate Change Problems CDM Clean Development Mechanism CCDP-Kg Climate Change Dialogue Platform CCMIP Coordination Council on Macroeconomic and Investment Policy CFCM Climate Finance Coordination Mechanism CFC Climate Finance Centre CIF Climate Investment Funds CIP Climate Investment Programme COP Conference of the Parties (to the UNFCCC) DPCC Development Partners Coordination Council EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EE Executing Entity (for the Green Climate Fund and Adaptation Fund) FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (of the United Nations) GCF Green Climate Fund GEF Global Environment Facility GEF SCCF Global Environment Facility’s Special Climate Change Fund GHG Greenhouse gas Gosstroy State Agency for Architecture, Construction and Communal Services IAWG Inter-Agency Working Group (on Climate Finance) IDA International Development Association IE Implementing Entity (for the Adaptation Fund) IFCA Investment facility for Central
    [Show full text]
  • Are Central Asian Leaders Learning from Upheavals in Kyrgyzstan?
    Journal of Eurasian Studies 2 (2011) 115–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Eurasian Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/euras Are Central Asian leaders learning from upheavals in Kyrgyzstan? Paul Kubicek* Department of Political Science, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA article info abstract Article history: Kyrgyzstan has experienced two violent overthrows of its government in recent years. Received 30 November 2010 Some hoped or feared these events would inspire or spark political change elsewhere. This Accepted 24 February 2011 article examines what the relevant lessons of those events are and if other Central Asian leaders, especially those in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, have learned these lessons and Keywords: made adjustments to preserve their rule. It argues that while many of the lessons from Central Asia Kyrgyzstan have already been incorporated into policy, the toughest task for rulers in the Political reform region is managing patronage politics, something that was done poorly in Kyrgyzstan. Regime change Ó fi Tulip revolution Copyright 2011, Asia-Paci c Research Center, Hanyang University. Produced and Patronage politics distributed by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved. Whereas leadership succession and regime change have mobilization and violence and sent shockwaves throughout been topics debated by observers of post-Soviet Central the region, as the obvious question was whether the events Asia, both phenomena remain more prospective or hypo- in Kyrgyzstan could occur elsewhere. thetical than real. The two largest post-Soviet Central Asian Thus far, the answer appears to be no. Whereas lead- states, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, have seen no leadership ership change àlaTurkmenistan will, of course, be inevi- change since becoming independent states nearly two table, the leaders of Central Asian states look, superficially decades ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colour Revolutions in the Post-Soviet Space: Illusion and Reality of the Post-Soviet Civil Disobedience
    Krzysztof Kozłowski Warsaw School of Economics The Colour Revolutions in the Post-Soviet Space: Illusion and Reality of the Post-Soviet Civil Disobedience Abstract The political events that took place at the end of 2003 in Georgia, in 2004 in Ukraine and in 2005 in Kyrgyzstan are popularly called the Rose, Orange and Tulip Revolution or collectively: the Colour Revolutions in the post-Soviet space. At first glance the term “revolution” may seem appropriate. The Colour Revolutions have resulted in the regime change in all the three states. However, from a decade-long perspective one may notice that the revolutionary changes in the political systems of Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan did not actually take place. The post-revolutionary reality: the Russian-Georgian war and criminal charges against the revolutionary Georgian President Micheil Saakashvili, the infamous ending to the political career of the revolutionary leader Victor Yushchenko just four year after the Orange Revolution and the spectacular collapse of the Victor Yanukovych regime, which led to a hybrid warfare with Russia, or Kyrgyzstan’s permanent political instability following the revolutionary events of 2005 require yet another insight into what has happened in Tbilisi, Kiev, and Bishkek. Without an in-depth analysis of the events, it is impossible to understand the fundamental social and political dynamics of the ongoing and future changes in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus or Central Asia. The re-evaluation of the Colour Revolutions is not only of historical importance, though. It is also a universal lesson concerning the most important challenge that all the democratic social movements active in the authoritarian or post-authoritarian states have to face: how to manage large-scale civil disobedience protests of a disappointed society while the ruling governments do not follow democratic rules and the international community does not fully comprehend the significance of the ongoing changes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Social Media and Conflict in Kyrgyzstan, SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security 2011/1
    SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security No. 2011/1August 2011 NEW SOCIAL MEDIA AND SUMMARY w During 2010 Kyrgyzstan CONFLICT IN KYRGYZSTAN experienced two periods of conflict that took the country to the brink of civil war: the neil melvin and tolkun umaraliev* overthrow of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev in April and the ethnic violence in the south of the country in June. I. Introduction The use of blogs and social network sites as well as mobile From March to June 2010 Kyrgyzstan experienced major political and social and multimedia platforms conflict. In April President Kurmanbek Bakiyev was overthrown following during the upheaval has led a violent confrontation with opposition groups that left 86 people dead and some observers to link many injured. Two months later, ethnic Kyrgyz and Uzbek groups clashed developments in Kyrgyzstan to in the southern city of Osh. The violence quickly escalated and spread other recent cases of social across the south of the country. By the time the violence subsided, official protest where new media has sources reported approximately 470 dead, thousands injured, hundreds of been prominent. However, thousands displaced, and houses and businesses across the south extensively these events offer no simple damaged.1 In addition to attracting widespread international and regional answer to the current social attention, the events were subject to unprecedented levels of reporting as media debate. The complex and shifting role they were unfolding, thanks in part to the use of a variety of new and social of new media as a factor in the media—mobile phone text messaging, emailing, photo sharing, social net- events in Kyrgyzstan illustrates working, video hosting and the like.
    [Show full text]