DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Tsarist Policy on the Armenian Ques- Tion in the South Caucasus (1903-1914)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Tsarist Policy on the Armenian Ques- Tion in the South Caucasus (1903-1914) ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output The evolution of Tsarist policy on the Armenian ques- tion in the South Caucasus (1903-1914) https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40100/ Version: Public Version Citation: Onol, Onur (2014) The evolution of Tsarist policy on the Ar- menian question in the South Caucasus (1903-1914). [Thesis] (Unpub- lished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email The Evolution of Tsarist Policy on the Armenian Question in the South Caucasus (1903-1914) Onur Onol Department of History, Classics and Archeology Birkbeck, University of London Submitted for the degree of PhD November 2014 1 The work presented in this thesis is my own. Onur Onol 2 ABSTRACT From the Tsarist confiscation of the properties of the Armenian Church in 1903 to the outbreak of the First World War, relations between Russia and its Armenian subjects gradually changed. This thesis scrutinizes how and why this gradual change took place between 1903 and 1914 by looking at the interaction between the Russian administration and the three political pillars of the Russian Armenians (the Dashnaktsutiun, the Armenian Church, and the Armenian bourgeoisie) as well as Russian foreign policy considerations. The confiscation decree of 1903 triggered an immense reaction by the Russian Armenians against the Russian government, which became part of the revolutionary unrest in the South Caucasus in 1905. The relations began to improve with the arrival of the viceroy of the Caucasus, Illarion I. Vorontsov-Dashkov as a general Tsarist recovery was underway. From 1907 to 1912, the Russian authorities reformulated their relations with the political pillars of the Russian Armenians. In this period, by eliminating the Dashnaktsutiun as a political threat in the South Caucasus and sorting out its differences with the Armenian Church and the Armenian bourgeoisie, the Russian regime had improved its relations with the Russian Armenians. By 1912, there were no serious disagreements between the Russian Armenians and the Tsarist authorities, for whom other threats, such as the pan-Islamist movement in the South Caucasus took precedence. This study also adds the foreign policy dimension to the picture as it became the dominant aspect of the relations between the Russian administration and the Russian Armenians between 1912 and 1914. The changes in the international dynamics, particularly regarding the future of the Ottoman Empire, further solidified the improved relations as Russia decided to become the patron and the defender of Armenians in late 1912. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I would like to express my utmost gratitude to my supervisor, Orlando Figes, for his invaluable guidance during my studies. I am grateful for his detailed comments on my drafts, his suggestions on style as well as his interest and enthusiasm in my academic development. I have always felt fortunate to have him as my supervisor. At the Department of History, Classics and Archaeology, Birkbeck College, I was provided with support at different stages of my studies that smoothed my path. My mentors Frank Trentmann and Jessica Reinisch gave me useful advice on various aspects of academic life. I would like to thank Jessica Reinisch and Fred Anscombe for their valuable comments during my upgrade. I am also grateful to the Department of History, Classics and Archaeology and the Birkbeck College for awarding me scholarships without which it would have been impossible for me to pursue my PhD studies. I would also like to thank my examiners, Simon Dixon of University College London, SSEES and Peter Waldron of University of East Anglia, for their comments on the thesis and suggestions for future research. I would also like to thank my professors at the Center for Russian Studies, I.D. Bilkent University who fostered my initial training as an historian of imperial Russia. In this sense, I am indebted to Mark Almond, Hasan Ali Karasar, Hakan Kırımlı, Sean McMeekin, and in particular, Norman Stone, who has been a continuous source of support and erudite guidance that steered me in the right direction. I would also like to thank the staff of the archives and libraries in which I undertook the research for this thesis. During my studies, I have been fortunate to have friends who offered their support when I needed it. I would like to thank Erman Şahin for his friendship in London and scholarly talks we have had. Christine Stone in Oxford; David Rowson and William Taylor in London; Siyami Eren Çakar in Moscow; Mustafa Bozkurt, Kazım Şenocak, Serkan Eymur and Gülüzar Eymur in Ankara helped me in various ways during my studies for which I will always be grateful. 4 I would like to thank my wife, Tuğba Ayas, whose love and unconditional support made me go on. During difficult times, she has always been there for me to listen and offer encouragement. I am extremely grateful to my parents, who have supported me emotionally and financially since I started my graduate studies. They have been very understanding and their love and support helped me sail through. My brother Can opened his home to me and also became a serious companion during the last phases of finishing my thesis. I am forever indebted to my family for all they have done for me. 5 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………...4 CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………………….6 NOTES ON TRANSLITERATION AND USAGE………………………………………7 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...8 CHAPTER 1: The Russian Armenians in the Sea of Troubles: From Confiscation to Revolution (1903–1907)………………………………………………………………....32 CHAPTER 2: Russia against the Dashnaktsutiun (1907–1912)…………………………69 CHAPTER 3: St. Petersburg against Tiflis: The Relations between the Russian Administration and the Armenian Church (1907-1912)………………………………..107 CHAPTER 4: The National Question in the South Caucasus and the Relations between the Viceroyalty and the Armenian Bourgeoisie (1907-1912)…………………………..144 CHAPTER 5: Russia as the Patron and Defender of Armenians: The Question of Armenian Reforms in the Ottoman Empire and its Impact on the Relations between Russia and Its Armenian Subjects (1912-1914)………………………………………...194 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………251 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………263 6 NOTES ON TRANSLITERATION AND USAGE For the transliteration of Russian-language words and the names in the cited Russian documents (with the exception of anglicized names of the Tsars and a few well- established names), I have employed a simplified Library of Congress system but I have omitted the hard and soft signs for the sake of convenience. For place names that are located in the Russian Empire, I have preferred the official Russian name (hence Tiflis, not Tbilisi) but have kept the English forms of the most common ones (e.g. St. Petersburg, Moscow etc.). Although the term Transcaucasus was used in the official documents, I have preferred ‘South Caucasus,’ which is geographically more appropriate and politically more neutral. The Russian Armenian surnames mostly had three variants in the official Russian documentation, (ending in -ian, -iants, and -ov), which were sometimes used interchangeably by different Tsarist state institutions. In most cases, I have preferred the variant in the cited Russian official document. The Julian calendar was in force in Russia until 1918 and was thirteen days behind the Gregorian calendar in the twentieth century. For the Russian primary documents cited in the thesis, I have given the date on the document, followed by its conversion to the Gregorian calendar in brackets. The Ottoman Empire had Rumi and Hijra calendars and I have given the Ottoman date on the document followed by its Gregorian equivalent in brackets. For the sake of consistency and convenience, I have used Gregorian dates throughout the text. 7 INTRODUCTION This study begins with a hectic period in the history of Russian-Armenian relations, the confiscation of Armenian Church properties in 1903, and ends with the outbreak of another one, the First World War. In the Russian Empire, the treatment of the Armenians underwent a gradual change between 1903 and 1914. This study intends to explain this change in the Russian treatment of its own Armenians by analysing domestic and international dynamics that caused it. It was said that ‘if Siberia and Central Asia were the hells of the Russian functionary, the Caucasus was his purgatory.’1 The Russian functionaries had to deal with a gamut of nationalities, religions and naturally problems of the warmer part of their purgatory, the South Caucasus, which had been under Russian control since 1828. As Layton asserts, back in the early days of the Russian conquest, the Caucasus was considered a rich but a backward place in the imagination of the Russians, not unlike India in the eyes of the British.2 If the resources were put into good use, with proper administration, the Russians believed that they could entirely change the place. The first attempt was made with Tiflis when the first viceroy, Mikhail S. Vorontsov, arrived in 1845. The Russian administrative capital of the Caucasus was rebuilt in line with the latest urban tastes of the day. Big boulevards, bridges, theatres, and an opera were added to the centre of the city. After the defeat at the Crimean War came the tumultuous wars in the North Caucasus, which forced the Tsarist regime to put military prerogatives first on the agenda. It took a nearly a decade to pacify the place and then the news of the great reforms of the 1860s reached the southern corner of the empire. However, the land reforms—officially introduced in the South Caucasus in 1870—were an arduous task as much as anywhere in 1 Quoted in Luigi Villari, Fire and Sword in the Caucasus (London: T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'You Do Not Know What Tomorrow
    OCTOBER 31, 2020 MMirror-SpeirTHEror-SpeARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXXI, NO. 16, Issue 4658 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 IN BRIEF Third Ceasefire Armenia Has 2 Azeri Broken by POWs; Azerbaijan 17 YEREVAN (PanARMENIAN.Net) — The Armenian side has two Azerbaijani prisoners of war who have Azerbaijan as been interrogated, according to Rafayel Vardanyan, Head of the Department of Criminalistics at Armenia’s Investigative Committee. Death Toll “They are kept in conditions that comply with international humanitarian law, receive appropriate Mounts medical care and food,” Vardanyan told reporters on Tuesday, October 27. STEPANAKERT (Combined Sources) — Vardanyan said 17 servicemen from the Fighting in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict Armenian side are currently kept in Azerbaijan. zone reportedly spread on Tuesday, October It was reported earlier that an Armenian civilian 27, to an area adjacent to Armenia’s border named Azniv Baghdasaryan was captured by the with Iran. Azerbaijani military on October 7. The Armenian Defense Ministry accused the Azerbaijani army of shelling its border Georgia Bars posts and wounding several Armenian ser- vicemen in the morning. The Azerbaijani Ambulances Headed to side used artillery and combat drones, it said, adding that one of those unmanned Armenia aerial vehicles was shot down over TBILISI (News.am) — Georgia on October 26 Armenian territory. blocked a batch of ambulances from entering A ministry spokeswoman, Shushan Armenia through the Upper Lars border checkpoint Stepanyan, said Armenian army units and between Russia and Georgia, reported the Telegram border guards had to strike back in response. channel of Infoteka 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet of Armenia, 1920
    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenophobia in Azerbaijan
    Հարգելի՛ ընթերցող, Արցախի Երիտասարդ Գիտնականների և Մասնագետների Միավորման (ԱԵԳՄՄ) նախագիծ հանդիսացող Արցախի Էլեկտրոնային Գրադարանի կայքում տեղադրվում են Արցախի վերաբերյալ գիտավերլուծական, ճանաչողական և գեղարվեստական նյութեր` հայերեն, ռուսերեն և անգլերեն լեզուներով: Նյութերը կարող եք ներբեռնել ԱՆՎՃԱՐ: Էլեկտրոնային գրադարանի նյութերն այլ կայքերում տեղադրելու համար պետք է ստանալ ԱԵԳՄՄ-ի թույլտվությունը և նշել անհրաժեշտ տվյալները: Շնորհակալություն ենք հայտնում բոլոր հեղինակներին և հրատարակիչներին` աշխատանքների էլեկտրոնային տարբերակները կայքում տեղադրելու թույլտվության համար: Уважаемый читатель! На сайте Электронной библиотеки Арцаха, являющейся проектом Объединения Молодых Учёных и Специалистов Арцаха (ОМУСA), размещаются научно-аналитические, познавательные и художественные материалы об Арцахе на армянском, русском и английском языках. Материалы можете скачать БЕСПЛАТНО. Для того, чтобы размещать любой материал Электронной библиотеки на другом сайте, вы должны сначала получить разрешение ОМУСА и указать необходимые данные. Мы благодарим всех авторов и издателей за разрешение размещать электронные версии своих работ на этом сайте. Dear reader, The Union of Young Scientists and Specialists of Artsakh (UYSSA) presents its project - Artsakh E-Library website, where you can find and download for FREE scientific and research, cognitive and literary materials on Artsakh in Armenian, Russian and English languages. If re-using any material from our site you have first to get the UYSSA approval and specify the required data. We thank all the authors
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran
    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
    [Show full text]
  • Varujan Vosganian, the Book of Whispers
    Varujan Vosganian, The Book of Whispers Chapters seven and eight Translation: Alistair Ian Blyth Seven ‘Do not harm their women,’ said Armen Garo. ‘And nor the children.’ One by one, all the members of the Special Mission gathered at the offices of the Djagadamard newspaper in Constantinople. They had been selected with care. The group had been whittled down to those who had taken part in such operations before, working either alone or in ambush parties. ‘I trust only a man who has killed before,’ Armen Garo had declared. They were given photographs of those they were to seek out, wherever they were hiding. Their hiding places might be anywhere, from Berlin or Rome to the steppes of Central Asia. Broad-shouldered, bull-necked Talaat Pasha, the Minister of the Interior, was a brawny man, whose head, with its square chin and jaws that could rip asunder, was more like an extension of his powerful chest. In the lower part of the photograph, his fists, twice the size of a normal man’s, betokened pugnacity. Beside him, fragile, her features delicate, his wife wore a white dress and a lace cap in the European style, so very different from the pasha’s fez. Then there was Enver, a short man made taller by his boot heels. He had haughty eyes and slender fingers that preened the points of his moustache. He was proud of his army commander’s braids, which, cascading luxuriantly from his shoulders and covering his narrow chest, sought to disguise the humble beginnings of a son whose mother, in order to raise him, had plied one of the most despised trades in all the Empire: she had washed the bodies of the dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Sand: Canadians in Persia & Transcaucasia, 1918 Tom
    RED SAND: CANADIANS IN PERSIA & TRANSCAUCASIA, 1918 TOM SUTTON, MA THESIS ROUGH DRAFT, 20 JANUARY 2012 CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 Stopgap 2 Volunteers 3 The Mad Dash 4 Orphans 5 Relief 6 The Push 7 Bijar 8 Baku 9 Evacuation 10 Historiography Conclusion Introduction NOTES IN BOLD ARE EITHER TOPICS LEFT UNFINISHED OR GENERAL TOPIC/THESIS SENTENCES. REFERECNCE MAP IS ON LAST PAGE. Goals, Scope, Thesis Brief assessment of literature on Canada in the Russian Civil War. Brief assessment of literature on Canadians in Dunsterforce. 1 Stopgap: British Imperial Intentions and Policy in the Caucasus & Persia Before 1917, the Eastern Front was held almost entirely by the Russian Imperial Army. From the Baltic to the Black Sea, through the western Caucasus and south to the Persian Gulf, the Russians bolstered themselves against the Central Empires. The Russians and Turks traded Kurdistan, Assyria, and western Persia back and forth until the spring of 1917, when the British captured Baghdad, buttressing the south-eastern front. Meanwhile, the Russian army withered in unrest and desertion. Russian troops migrated north through Tabriz, Batum, Tiflis, and Baku, leaving dwindling numbers to defend an increasingly tenable front, and as the year wore on the fighting spirit of the Russian army evaporated. In the autumn of 1917, the three primary nationalities of the Caucasus – Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis – called an emergency meeting in Tiflis in reaction to the Bolshevik coup d'etat in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In attendance were representatives from trade unions, civil employees, regional soviets, political parties, the army, and lastly Entente military agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915
    Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 i v ABSTRACT Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Yektan Turkyilmaz 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the conflict in Eastern Anatolia in the early 20th century and the memory politics around it. It shows how discourses of victimhood have been engines of grievance that power the politics of fear, hatred and competing, exclusionary
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-19834-0 — a History of Modern Iran Ervand Abrahamian Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-19834-0 — A History of Modern Iran Ervand Abrahamian Index More Information Index Abadan, 58, 61, 80, 112 Azalis, 209 Abadan cinema fire, 163 Azerbaijan autonomy (1945), 114–15 Abbas Mirza, 14 Abdul ‘Azim Mosque, 16, 20, 40 Babis, xx, 18, 52, 147 Ahmad Shah, xv, 54, 66, 67 Bahais, 18–20 Ahmadinejad, Mahmud, xv, 198–201 Bahar, Muhammad Taqi (Malek al-Shu’ara), Ala, Hussein, 105, 131 xvi, 113 Alam, Asadallah, xv, 133 Bakhtiyaris Alavi, Bozorg, xv, 113 in the civil war, 54, 55–56 al-e Ahmad, Jalal, xv, 114, 119, 182 and Muhammad Reza Shah elections, 109 Amin al-Dowleh, 14 Qajar state manipulation of, 32–33 Amin al-Sultan, 14 under Reza Shah, 96 Amini, Abul-Qassem, 107 tribal system complexity of, 22–24 Amini, Ali, 131 during World War I, 57–59 Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), 120–21 Baluchis, 12, 18, 22, 27, 96, 203 Anglo-Persian Agreement, xvii, 62–63, 64, 66 Bamdad, Mehdi, 114 Anglo-Russian Convention, 51 Bani-Sadr, Abdul-Hassan, xvi, 161 Arani, Taqi, xvi bast (sanctuary), 45, 92 Arayanpour, Yahyi, 114 Bayat, Morteza, 105 aristocracy bazaars, 154–56, 183–84 education of, 41 Bazargan, Mehdi, xvi, 166–68, 172 flight from the Islamic Revolution, 177–81 Behazin, 114 fraksiuns, 107–8 Behbehani, Sayyed Abdallah, xvii, 44, 48, under Muhammad Reza Shah, 103–7, 108–10 53, 59 in Qajar society, 25–26 Beheshti, Ayatollah, 182 in Qajar state, 31–34 Black Friday, 163 under Reza Shah, 95–96 Boir Ahmadis, 12, 19, 22, 33, 61, 96, 115 and socialist movement, 110–11 Boroujerdi, Ayatollah Aqa Hajj Aqa Hussein during World
    [Show full text]
  • Houri Berberian. in Roving Revolutionaries: Armenians and the Connected Revolutions in the Russian, Iranian and Ottoman Worlds
    Houri Berberian. In Roving Revolutionaries: Armenians and the Connected Revolutions in the Russian, Iranian and Ottoman Worlds. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2019. Pp. 320. Paper. $34.95. Middle East historian and Chair of Armenian Studies at the University of California, Irvine, Professor Berberian uses a transnational approach to examine the Russian Revolution (1905), the Iranian Revolution (1908) and the Ottoman (Young Turk) Revolution (1905-11), and focuses on the role of Armenian revolutionaries in connecting these revolutionary upheavals and histories. Berberian shows how Armenians simultaneously participated in all three revolutions due to its geographical location perched between Russia, Iran and Ottoman Anatolia. Specifically, she shows how Armenian intellectuals and revolutionaries utilized modern technology to facilitate the spread of information, revolutionary literature, ideologies, and weapons within the empires, while revolutionizing their own ethnic community. Moreover, these revolutionaries were linked to a global network of Armenian diaspora, using steam ships, telegraphs and an increased access to printing technology, which profoundly contributed to the movements and migration of revolutionaries in Iran, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Berberian first isolates the revolutions as separate entities then connects them through Armenian revolutionaries and intellectuals. She shows how these uprisings were connected through the systemic circulation of ideologies, Armenian activities, objects, arms, and print. In the early twentieth century, Armenians were a small minority population within all three empires, yet their political impact was profound. Global philosophies and ideologies of the nineteenth century, such as liberalism and socialism, were reaching the Middle East and the Southern Caucasus. Berberian argues Armenians were at the forefront of these new ideologies, which allowed a modern revolutionary movement of their own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism Citation for published version: Riga, L 2008, 'The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite', American Journal of Sociology, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 649-705. https://doi.org/10.1086/592862 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1086/592862 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: American Journal of Sociology Publisher Rights Statement: © Riga, L. (2008). The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite. American Journal of Sociology, 114(3), 649-705 doi: 10.1086/592862. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite Author(s): Liliana Riga Source: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 114, No. 3 (November 2008), pp. 649-705 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/592862 . Accessed: 22/01/2014 06:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
    [Show full text]
  • Armenians and the Cleansing of Muslims 1878–1915: Influences from the Balkans
    Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs ISSN: 1360-2004 (Print) 1469-9591 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjmm20 Armenians and the Cleansing of Muslims 1878–1915: Influences from the Balkans Brad Dennis To cite this article: Brad Dennis (2019): Armenians and the Cleansing of Muslims 1878–1915: Influences from the Balkans, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2019.1654186 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2019.1654186 Published online: 14 Aug 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 11 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjmm20 Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2019.1654186 Armenians and the Cleansing of Muslims 1878–1915: Influences from the Balkans BRAD DENNIS Abstract Armenian liberationists and revolutionaries since the end of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1878 looked to the Balkan model of political autonomy and independence as inspiration for crafting a liberation strategy for the Armenians in Eastern Anato- lia. In spite of the fact that more pragmatic revolutionaries attempted to convince the Armenian community that the Balkan model would not work for the Armenians because of demographic and geopolitical differences, the Armenian struggle for inde- pendence from the Ottoman Empire was waged in a way that was similar to the Balkan model. There is strong reason to believe that if the Armenians had had stron- ger British and Russian backing and constituted a slightly higher percentage of the population in the region of Eastern Anatolia that an independent Armenia would have emerged in Eastern Anatolia and Cilicia much in the same manner that an independent Bulgaria, Serbia, and Montenegro emerged in the Balkans.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREAT WAR and the TRAGEDY of ANATOLIA ATATURK SUPREME COUNCIL for CULTURE, LANGUAGE and HISTORY PUBLICATIONS of TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY Serial XVI - No
    THE GREAT WAR AND THE TRAGEDY OF ANATOLIA ATATURK SUPREME COUNCIL FOR CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND HISTORY PUBLICATIONS OF TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY Serial XVI - No. 88 THE GREAT WAR AND THE TRAGEDY OF ANATOLIA (TURKS AND ARMENIANS IN THE MAELSTROM OF MAJOR POWERS) SALAHi SONYEL TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRINTING HOUSE - ANKARA 2000 CONTENTS Sonyel, Salahi Abbreviations....................................................................................................................... VII The great war and the tragedy of Anatolia (Turks and Note on the Turkish Alphabet and Names.................................................................. VIII Armenians in the maelstrom of major powers) / Salahi Son­ Preface.................................................................................................................................... IX yel.- Ankara: Turkish Historical Society, 2000. x, 221s.; 24cm.~( Atattirk Supreme Council for Culture, Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 Language and History Publications of Turkish Historical Chapter 1 - Genesis of the 'Eastern Q uestion'................................................................ 14 Society; Serial VII - No. 189) Turco- Russian war of 1877-78......................................................................... 14 Bibliyografya ve indeks var. The Congress of B erlin....................................................................................... 17 ISBN 975 - 16
    [Show full text]