Sydney Rock Oyster (Saccostrea Glomerata)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sydney Rock Oyster (Saccostrea Glomerata) Improved Early Survival of Molluscs: Sydney Rock Oyster (Saccostrea glomerata) Michael P. Heasman, Lindsay Goard, John Diemar & Richard B. Callinan NSW Fisheries Port Stephens Fisheries Centre Private Bag 1 Nelson Bay NSW 2315, Australia. Aquaculture CRC Project A.2.1 December 2000 NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 29 ISSN 1440-3544 Table of Contents iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................V 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Results - Larval Disease ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Epidemiological investigations .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Pathology ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Experimental investigations ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Optimisation of rearing conditions............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.5 Experimental use of probiotics................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Results- Juvenile (Spat) Disease ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Epidemiological investigations .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Pathology ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Experimental investigations ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION ...................................................................................................... 5 3.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT............................................................................................. 7 4.0 OVERALL STRATEGY ............................................................................................................................ 7 5.0 INVESTIGATION OF MASS MORTALITY SYNDROME OF LARVAL S. GLOMERATA ................................... 8 5.1 Epidemiological Investigations......................................................................................................... 8 5.1.1 Methods...................................................................................................................................................... 8 5.2 Results and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 8 5.2.1 Re-evaluation of hatchery records and reports for the period 1985 to 1989 .............................................. 8 5.2.2 Analyses of hatchery records and reports for the period 1990-2000 ........................................................10 5.3 Pathology (Histopathological and micro-biological investigations).............................................. 17 5.4 Experimental Investigations............................................................................................................ 18 5.4.1 Challenge tests with Vibrio isolates ......................................................................................................... 18 5.4.2 Experiment to further elucidate the suspected involvement of an infective agent(s)................................ 18 5.4.3 Results...................................................................................................................................................... 19 5.4.4 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................................. 19 5.5 Disease prevention through optimised temperature regimes for gamete storage, incubation and larval rearing of S. glomerata – Summary of results.............................................................................20 5.6 Use of Probiotics ............................................................................................................................ 21 6.0 INVESTIGATION OF MASS MORTALITY SYNDROME OF JUVENILE S. GLOMERATA ..................................... 26 6.1 Epidemiological Investigations....................................................................................................... 26 6.1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 26 6.1.2 Results...................................................................................................................................................... 27 6.2 Pathology........................................................................................................................................ 35 6.2.1 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 35 6.2.2 Histopathology reported by Dick Callinan............................................................................................... 35 6.2.3 Histopathology reported by Dr. Alex Hyatt (AAHL/CSIRO) .................................................................. 35 6.2.4 Histopathology reported by Assoc. Prof. Peter Hanna (Deakin University) ............................................ 35 6.2.5 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................................. 36 6.3 Experimental Investigations............................................................................................................ 36 6.3.1 Spat mortality experiment 1 ..................................................................................................................... 36 6.3.2 Spat mortality experiment 2 ..................................................................................................................... 42 Methods.............................................................................................................................................................. 42 CRC Project A.2.1 Heasman et al. iv Table of Contents 7.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................45 7.1 Mass Mortality Syndrome of Larval S. glomerata...........................................................................45 7.2 Mass Mortality Disease of Small (<2 mm) Juvenile S. glomerata ..................................................45 8.0 FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS...................................................................................................................46 9.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................47 10.0 STAFF .............................................................................................................................................49 11.0 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................51 CRC Project A.2.1 M.P. Heasman Acknowledgements v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am most grateful of technical support provided by NSW Fisheries staff Celina Gartrell, Tanya Sushames, Melissa Walker and Lynne Foulkes. I thank colleagues Drs John Nell, Wayne O’Connor and Geoff Allan for their professional advice. I would also like to thank consultant pathologists Drs Judith Handlinger, Mike Hine, Alex Hyatt, Peter Hanna, Deschen Chen, Tristan Renault, Ralph Elston, Jeremy Carsons and consultant epidemiologists Chris Baldock and Angus Cameron for their expert advice on epidemiological investigation. The assistance of collaborators on probiotic research Dr Lewis Gibson, Edward McGregor and Cheok Tan from UTS and of my wife Helena in preparing this report was invaluable and greatly appreciated. CRC Project A.2.1 Heasman et al. NSW Fisheries 1 1.0 SUMMARY Continuation of an otherwise very successful 10 year breeding program to produce fast growing disease resistant Sydney rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata depends on whether diseases of larval and juvenile S. glomerata below about 2 mm can be overcome. The objective of this project has been to systematically address and overcome both of these diseases. Five complimentary strategies have been adopted to investigate mass mortality diseases of larval and juvenile S glomerata. 1. Appraisal of all existing epidemiological information including in-house hatchery records and reports of previous epizootics and monitoring and documentation of ongoing hatchery and nursery operations at the PSFC. 2. Collection and preservation of larvae and spat for histopathological examination and
Recommended publications
  • An Assessment of Potential Heavy Metal Contaminants in Bivalve Shellfish from Aquaculture Zones Along the Coast of New South Wales, Australia
    PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Hazel Farrell,* Phil Baker, Grant Webster, Food Protection Trends, Vol 38, No. 1, p. 18–26 Copyright© 2018, International Association for Food Protection Edward Jansson, Elizabeth Szabo and 6200 Aurora Ave., Suite 200W, Des Moines, IA 50322-2864 Anthony Zammit NSW Food Authority, 6 Ave. of the Americas, Newington NSW 2127, Australia An Assessment of Potential Heavy Metal Contaminants in Bivalve Shellfish from Aquaculture Zones along the Coast of New South Wales, Australia ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Evaluation of shellfish aquaculture for potential contam- Certain elements are essential in human physiology; inants is essential for consumer confidence and safety. however, an incorrect balance or excess of certain elements Every three years, between 1999 and 2014, bivalve in the diet can result in negative health effects. Heavy metals shellfish from aquaculture zones in up to 31 estuaries are of particular concern because of their ability to persist across 2,000 km of Australia’s east coast were tested and accumulate in the environment. While heavy metals for cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium and zinc. can occur naturally in the environment, human activities Inorganic arsenic was included in the analyses in 2002, and run-off from urban and agricultural land use may and total arsenic was used as a screen for the inorganic increase their concentrations (6, 29). This is particularly form in subsequent years. Concentrations of inorganic important when considering the growing demands on arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury were low and did not coastal resources due to increasing populations (3) and the exceed maximum limits mandated in the Australia New ability of filter feeding bivalve shellfish to bio-accumulate Zealand Food Standards Code.
    [Show full text]
  • National Review of Ostrea Angasi Aquaculture: Historical Culture, Current Methods and Future Priorities
    National review of Ostrea angasi aquaculture: historical culture, current methods and future priorities Christine Crawford Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies ! [email protected] " secure.utas.edu.au/profles/staff/imas/Christine-Crawford Executive summary Currently in Australia Ostrea angasi oysters (angasi) are being cultured on a small scale, with several farmers growing relatively small numbers of angasis on their predominately Sydney rock or Pacifc oyster farms. Very few farmers are culturing commercially viable quantities of angasi oysters. There are several reasons for this. Although angasi oysters occur in the intertidal zone, they are naturally most abundant in the subtidal and are less tolerant of fuctuating environmental conditions, especially temperature and salinity, than other oyster species. They also have a much shorter shelf life and start to gape after one to two days. Additionally, angasi oysters are susceptible to Bonamiosis, a parasitic disease which has caused major mortalities in several areas. Stress caused by extremes or a combination of factors such as high stocking densities, rough handling, poor food, high temperatures and low salinities have all been observed to increase the prevalence of Bonamiosis. Growth rates of angasi oysters have also been variable, ranging from two to four years to reach market size. From discussions with oyster famers, managers and researchers and from a review of the literature I suggest that the survival and growth of cultured angasi oysters could be signifcantly improved by altering some farm management practices. Firstly, growout techniques need to be specifcally developed for angasi oysters which maintain a low stress environment (not modifcations from other oysters).
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding and Domestication of Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 2014 Breeding And Domestication Of Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea Virginica) Lines For Culture In The Mid-Atlantic, Usa: Line Development And Mass Selection For Disease Resistance Anu Frank-Lawale Virginia Institute of Marine Science Standish K. Allen Jr. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Lionel Degremont Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Frank-Lawale, Anu; Allen, Standish K. Jr.; and Degremont, Lionel, "Breeding And Domestication Of Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea Virginica) Lines For Culture In The Mid-Atlantic, Usa: Line Development And Mass Selection For Disease Resistance" (2014). VIMS Articles. 334. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, 153–165, 2014. BREEDING AND DOMESTICATION OF EASTERN OYSTER (CRASSOSTREA VIRGINICA) LINES FOR CULTURE IN THE MID-ATLANTIC, USA: LINE DEVELOPMENT AND MASS SELECTION FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE ANU FRANK-LAWALE,* STANDISH K. ALLEN, JR. AND LIONEL DE´GREMONT† Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Aquaculture Genetics and Breeding Technology Center, College of William and Mary, 1375 Greate Road, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 ABSTRACT A selective breeding program for Crassostrea virginica was established in 1997 as part of an initiative in Virginia to address declining oyster harvests caused by the two oyster pathogens Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) and Perkinsus marinus (Dermo).
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Reefs at Risk
    SHELLFISH REEFS AT RISK A Global Analysis of Problems and Solutions Michael W. Beck, Robert D. Brumbaugh, Laura Airoldi, Alvar Carranza, Loren D. Coen, Christine Crawford, Omar Defeo, Graham J. Edgar, Boze Hancock, Matthew Kay, Hunter Lenihan, Mark W. Luckenbach, Caitlyn L. Toropova, Guofan Zhang CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Condition of Oyster Reefs Globally Across Bays and Ecoregions ............ 14 Regional Summaries of the Condition of Shellfish Reefs ............................ 15 Overview of Threats and Causes of Decline ................................................................ 28 Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration and Management ................ 30 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 36 References .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Consequences of Pre-Contact Harvesting of Bay of Islands Fish and Shellfish, and Other Marine Taxa, Based on Midden Evidence
    Journal of Pacific Archaeology – Vol. 7 · No. 2 · 2016 – article – Ecological Consequences of Pre-Contact Harvesting of Bay of Islands Fish and Shellfish, and other Marine Taxa, based on Midden Evidence John D. Booth1 ABSTRACT Midden contents – especially those that have associated dates – can provide compelling evidence concerning the effects of human harvesting on the diversity, distribution, abundance, and mean individual-size of shallow-water marine stocks. Archaeological Site Recording Scheme Site Record Forms for the 767 Bay of Islands middens as of August 2014 were summarised according to contents; these included 28 calibrated dates associated with 16 individual sites. The oldest site was first settled possibly as early as the 13th Century. By the time of European contact, the population of the Bay of Islands was possibly as great as 10,000 (over half the resident population today), yet it seems that the 500 years of harvesting pressure left no lasting legacy on Bay of Islands’ fish and shellfish resources – with the probable exception of the fishing-out of local populations of the Cook Strait limpet, and possibly the overfishing of hapuku in shallow waters. Marine mammal and seabird bones were only reported from Early and Early/Middle Period middens, consistent with the rapid extirpation and extinction of taxa after human arrival in the northeast of the North Island. Keywords: Bay of Islands, middens, fish, shellfish, seabird, marine mammal, ecological impact INTRODUCTION eri and Waikino inlets (Figure 1) – later mined and kiln- burnt to sweeten local soils (Nevin 1984; NAR 2004) – were Māori were prodigious consumers of fish and shellfish, so so prominent as to be singled out in the 1922 geological much so that missionary William Colenso was moved to chart (Ferrar & Cropp 1922).
    [Show full text]
  • Olympia Oyster (Ostrea Lurida)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea lurida in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea lurida in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 56 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 30 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Gillespie, G.E. 2000. COSEWIC status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-30 pp. Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Graham E. Gillespie for writing the provisional status report on the Olympia Oyster, Ostrea lurida, prepared under contract with Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim and 2-month interim status reports were overseen by Robert Forsyth and Dr. Gerald Mackie, COSEWIC Molluscs Specialist Subcommittee Co-Chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’huître plate du Pacifique (Ostrea lurida) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • NICO Menu Food 2.8 NEW.Indd
    OYSTERS LITTLE NECK CLAMS 1.5 1/2 dozen minimum, accompanied with mignonette, cocktail sauce, hothog sauce, island, lemon VA juice & crostinis clean with a smooth bri NORTH ATLANTIC MID ATLANTIC SOUTH ATLANTIC MOOKIE BLUE* 4 JAMES RIVER* 2 SINGLE LADIES* 3.25 Damariscotta, ME James River, VA Lady Island, SC relatively high salinity, but are very meaty and a mild subtle salinity a clean, briny beginning characterized by their sweet finish. with a sweet finish BIG ROCK* 3 BLUE POINT* 2.75 BEKAH BAY* 2.75 Harwich, MA Long Island, CT Morehead , NC plump meat with clean mild briny flavor large cup, high brine, crisp mineral notes & high salinity followed by a sweet finish GLIDDEN POINT* 3.75 UMAMI* 3.75 LOWCOUNTRY CUPS* 3.75 Bristol, ME Narraganset Bay, RI ACE Basin, SC high salinity, medium to high salinity, vegetal finish assertive salinity, mild brine large body, firm texture THE “OT” * 4 LITTLE NECK CLAMS* 1.5 TIPSY OYSTER* +2 Harwich, MA Hog Island, VA Pick an oyster Big Rock oyster + tuna, capers, citrus clean with a smooth brine pick your poison ADDUCTOR MUSCLE we choose not to slice the adductor muscle on our oysters. Once the muscle is sliced, the oyster has 8 minutes left of life. Simply slide the cocktail fork under the muscle to release it from the shell. If you want it cut, please ask your server. *Consuming raw or undercooked shellfish may increase your risk of foodborne illness. RAW BAR GARDE MANGER A LA CARTE PLATEAUX La Salade Verte 12 pomegranate, pickled red onion tomato, goat cheese cigar, dijon vinaigrette Le Petit* 60
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Toxicology Ects of 4-Nonylphenol and 17
    Aquatic Toxicology 88 (2008) 39–47 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Toxicology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquatox Effects of 4-nonylphenol and 17␣-ethynylestradiol exposure in the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata: Vitellogenin induction and gonadal development a, a b c a a M.N. Andrew ∗, R.H. Dunstan , W.A. O’Connor , L. Van Zwieten , B. Nixon , G.R. MacFarlane a School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia b New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens Research Centre, Taylors Beach, NSW 2316, Australia c New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Environmental Centre of Excellence, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Adult Saccostrea glomerata were exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of 4-nonylphenol Received 10 October 2007 (1 ␮g/L and 100 ␮g/L) and 17␣-ethynylestradiol (5 ng/L and 50 ng/L) in seawater over 8 weeks. Exposures Received in revised form 4 March 2008 were performed to assess effects on vitellogenin induction and gonadal development during repro- Accepted 4 March 2008 ductive conditioning. Chronic direct estrogenicity within gonadal tissue was assessed via an estrogen receptor-mediated, chemical-activated luciferase reporter gene-expression assay (ER-CALUX®). Estradiol Keywords: equivalents (EEQ) were greatest in the 100 ␮g/L 4-nonylphenol exposure (28.7 2.3 ng/g tissue EEQ) 4-Nonylphenol ± while 17␣-ethynylestradiol at concentrations of 50 ng/L were 2.2 1.5 ng/g tissue EEQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Shellfish Aquaculture on the Environment
    Shellfish Industry Development Strategy A Case for Considering MSC Certification for Shellfish Cultivation Operations April 2008 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Mollusc Cultivation Mussel Cultivation Bottom Culture 6 Spat Collection 6 Harvesting 7 Suspended Culture 7 Longline Culture 8 Pole Culture 8 Raft Culture 9 Spat Collection 10 Environmental Impacts 11 Scallop Cultivation Japanese Method 13 New Zealand Methods 15 Scottish Methods 15 Environmental Impacts 16 Abalone Cultivation 16 Hatchery Production 17 Sea Culture 17 Diet 18 Environmental Impacts 19 Clam Cultivation 19 Seed Procurement 20 Manila Clams 20 Blood Cockles 20 Razor Clams 21 Siting of Grow Out Plots 21 Environmental Impacts 21 Oyster Cultivation 23 Flat Oysters 24 Cupped Oysters 24 Hanging Culture 24 Raft Culture 24 Longline Culture 25 Rock Culture 25 Stake Culture 25 Trestle Culture 25 Stick Culture 26 1 Ground Culture 26 Environmental Impacts 27 Crustacean Culture Clawed Lobsters Broodstock 29 Spawning 29 Hatching 29 Larval Culture 30 Nursery Culture 30 On-Growing 31 Ranching 31 Environmental Impacts 32 Spiny Lobsters 32 Broodstock and Spawning 33 Larval Culture 33 On-Growing 33 Environmental Impacts 34 Crab Cultivation Broodstock and Larvae 34 Nursery Culture 35 On-growing 35 Soft Shell Crab Production 36 Environmental Impacts 36 Conclusions 37 Acknowledgements 40 References 40 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The current trend within the seafood industry is a focus on traceability and sustainability with consumers and retailers becoming more concerned about the over-exploitation of our oceans. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has a sustainability certification scheme for wild capture fisheries. Currently there is no certification scheme for products from enhanced fisheries1 and aquaculture2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Cycle of the Rock Oyster, Striostrea Prismatica (Gray, 1825) from Two Locations on the Southern Coast of Ecuador
    Aquaculture Research, 2014, 1–11 doi:10.1111/are.12601 Reproductive cycle of the rock oyster, Striostrea prismatica (Gray, 1825) from two locations on the southern coast of Ecuador Alfredo Loor & Stanislaus Sonnenholzner Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Centro Nacional de Acuicultura e Investigaciones Marinas (CENAIM), Guayaquil, Ecuador Correspondence: A Loor, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Centro Nacional de Acuicultura e Investigaciones Marinas, Km 30.5 Vıa Perimetral, P.O. Box: 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Introduction The reproductive cycle of the rock oyster Striostrea The rock oyster, Striostrea prismatica (Gray, 1825) prismatica was determined at two fishing areas, Gen- (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Otreidae), is a commercially eral Villamil and Ayangue (located on the southern valuable species along the Pacific Ocean coast of coast of Ecuador), between May 2012 and April America, from La Paz, Baja California (Mexico), to 2013. Monthly sampling campaigns were performed Mancora, Tumbes (Peru) (Poutiers 1995). It is at both locations. The tissues were histologically found on rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal sub- examined to determine gonadal index (GI), oocyte strates down to 7 m of depth (Fournier 1992; Coan development, follicular area coverage and sex ratio. & Valentich-Scott 2012). The meat is highly appre- Surface seawater temperature, salinity and chloro- ciated as food plate and the valves are used by phyll a concentration were measured during sam- craftsmen, thus significantly contributing to the plings. Our results show a similar annual economy of coastal communities of Ecuador. Never- reproductive pattern at both locations. The GI theless, in coastal fishing villages such as Ayangue reached maximum values during the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List
    JANUARY 2020 Interstate Certified Shellfish * Shippers List * Fresh and Frozen Oysters, Clams, Mussels, Whole or Roe-on Scallops U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration INTRODUCTION THE SHIPPERS LISTED HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, KOREA, MEXICO AND NEW ZEALAND UNDER THE UNIFORM SANITATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL SHELLFISH PROGRAM. CONTROL MEASURES OF THE STATES ARE EVALUATED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA). CANADIAN, KOREAN, MEXICAN AND NEW ZEALAND SHIPPERS ARE INCLUDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SHELLFISH SANITATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN FDA AND THE GOVERNMENTS OF THESE COUNTRIES. Persons interested in receiving information and publications F. Raymond Burditt about the National Shellfish Sanitation Program contact: National Shellfish Standard Office of Food Safety Division of Seafood Safety 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-1562 (FAX) 301-436-2601 [email protected] Persons interested in receiving information about the Charlotte V. Epps Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL) contact: Retail Food & Cooperative Programs Coordination Staff, HFS-320 Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-2154 (FAX) 301-436-2632 Persons interested in receiving information about the ISSC Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference (ISSC) contact: Attn: Ken B. Moore, Executive Director 209-2 Dawson Road Columbia, SC 29223 (803) 788-7559 (FAX) 803-788-7576 Email: [email protected] Web Page: http://www.issc.org CFSAN Information Line 1-888-SAFEFOOD (723)-3366 ICSSL Monthly Listing FDA/CFSAN Web Homepage http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006753.htm NSSP Model Ordinance http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006754.htm 2 Definitions: Shellfish - All edible species of oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops;* either shucked or in the shell, fresh or frozen, whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish News No. 15
    CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT, FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE SCI ENCE SHELLFISH NEWS NUMBER 15 MAY 2003 CEFAS is an Executive Agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) 1 * ‘SHELLFISH NEWS’ is produced and edited by CEFAS on behalf of Defra, Fisheries II Division. * It is published twice yearly (May and November) as a service to the British shellfi sh farming and harvesting industry. * Copies are available free, on request to the editor. * Articles, news and comment relating to shellfi sh farming and harvesting are welcomed and should be sent to the editor. The deadline for the next issue is Friday 3rd October 2003. * The views expressed in this issue are those of the contributors and are not necessarily the views of the editors, CEFAS or of Defra. The editors reserve the right to edit articles and other contributions. Editor: Ian Laing CEFAS Weymouth Laboratory Barrack Road The Nothe Weymouth Dorset DT4 8UB Tel: 01305 206711 (Fax: 206601) email: [email protected] Assistant Editor: Denis Glasscock CEFAS Lowestoft Laboratory Pakefi eld Road Lowestoft Suffolk NR33 0HT Tel: 01502 524304 (Fax: 513865) email: [email protected] www.cefas.co.uk © Crown copyright, 2003 Requests for reproduction of material from this issue should be addressed to CEFAS 2 CONTENTS Page Articles Conwy mussels - a history ...............................................................................................................5 Too close a shave for razor clams? .................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]