Leopoldo López Mendoza Citizen of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leopoldo López Mendoza Citizen of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela White Paper On the Case of Leopoldo López Mendoza Citizen of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Authored By: Jared Genser1 Perseus Strategies José Antonio Maes February 27, 2018 (updated) Original Published July 21, 2014 1 Jared Genser serves as international counsel to Leopoldo López. Jose Antonio Maes previously served as López’s domestic counsel. For further information in English, contact +1 202 466 3069 or [email protected]. For information in Spanish, contact Juan Carlos Gutierrez, López’s domestic counsel, +58 412 33 217 44 or [email protected]. Perseus Strategies would like to thank Elise Baranouski, Sara Birkenthal, Michael Cullen, Chris Fletcher, Reid Kurtz, Juan Pablo Miramontes, Asma Noray, Maddie Orcutt, Samuel Ritholtz, Nicole Santiago, and Juancarlos Vargas for their support. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 I. Biographical Information on Leopoldo López Mendoza ............................................................ 7 II. Background Context and Current Situation in Venezuela ........................................................ 12 A. Rise of Chavismo... ............................................................................................................... 12 B. Protests in 2014 ..................................................................................................................... 15 C. Worsening Economic and Humanitarian Crisis .................................................................... 20 D. Parliamentary Elections of 2015 and Subsequent Dismantling of Democratic Institutions 21 E. The Campaign for a Recall Referendum .............................................................................. 23 F. Constitutional Crisis and Protests in 2017 ............................................................................ 26 G. Increasing Repression and Targeting of the Opposition ....................................................... 31 H. Mounting International Criticism ......................................................................................... 33 III. The Targeting and Trial of Leopoldo López ............................................................................ 35 A. Blame by Public Officials ..................................................................................................... 35 B. Charges and Arrest ................................................................................................................ 38 C. Conduct of the Trial .............................................................................................................. 42 D. 2015 Hunger Strike ............................................................................................................... 47 E. Judgment and Sentence ......................................................................................................... 48 F. Evolving Conditions of Imprisonment .................................................................................. 50 IV. Further Persecution of Leopoldo López and His Wife Lilian Tintori ..................................... 58 A. False Accusations and Disqualification to Exercise Political Rights Without Due Process of Law ................................................................................................................................... 58 B. Persecution of Lilian Tintori ................................................................................................. 58 V. Legal Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 59 A. The Detention Resulted from Leopoldo López’s Exercise of the Rights or Freedoms Guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Universal Declaration of Human Rights ............................................................................................... 59 1. The Venezuelan Government Arrested and Imprisoned Leopoldo López Because He Exercised His Right to Freedom of Expression ............................................................... 60 2. The Venezuelan Government Arrested and Imprisoned Leopoldo López Because He Exercised His Right to Freedoms of Peaceful Assembly and Association ...................... 65 3. The Venezuelan Government Arrested and Imprisoned Leopoldo López Because He Exercised His Right to Take Part in Public Affairs and Be Elected Without Unreasonable Restrictions ................................................................................................ 66 B. The Trial and Detention of Leopoldo López Failed to Respect International Norms Relating to the Right to a Fair Trial Guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ................................... 67 1. The Venezuelan Government Failed to Provide Leopoldo López an Independent and Impartial Judiciary ............................................................................................................ 67 2. The Venezuelan Government Failed to Afford Leopoldo López the Presumption of Innocence .......................................................................................................................... 70 2 3. The Venezuelan Government Failed to Provide Leopoldo López with the Right to Present His Defense .......................................................................................................... 71 4. The Venezuelan Government Failed to Provide the Right to Attorney-Client Confidentiality .................................................................................................................. 71 C. The Extended Solitary Confinement of Leopoldo López Violates the Prohibition Against Torture ................................................................................................................................... 72 VI. Opinion of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ................................................ 74 VII. International Support ............................................................................................................ 76 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 90 Appendix I – Overview of Past Political Persecution Against Leopoldo López by Venezuelan Government: False Accusations and Disqualification to Exercise Political Rights Without Due Process of Law .................................................................................................................................. 91 Appendix II – Leopoldo López’s Speeches (January 23, 2014, February 12, 2014, February 16, 2014, and February 18, 2014; Opening Statement to Court, June 2, 2014) ...................................... 98 Appendix III – Opeds in Washington Post, Huffington Post, Foreign Policy, New York Times, El País Wall Street Journal, Miami Herald, La Prensa (Panama), and Profiles in Foreign Policy and the Atlantic. ..................................................................................................................................... 128 3 Executive Summary In the past decades, democracy and respect for human rights have expanded throughout Latin America. After the 1958 coup that displaced Marcos Pérez Jiménez, Venezuela became an example of a Latin American democracy. However, in the past eighteen years this has not held true, as successive rulers have eroded respect for human rights and the rule of law in Venezuela. The presidencies of Hugo Chávez (1999–2013) and Nicolás Maduro (2013–present) have been marked by violence, inflation, scarcity of goods, a lack of judicial independence and impartiality, and increasing persecution of journalists and political opponents. During his time in office, Chávez enacted a series of social and economic measures, including nationalization, social welfare programs, and opposition to neoliberal economics, aimed at improving quality of life for Venezuelans. Despite Chávez’s bold vision for the country, his presidency saw a dramatic concentration of power and disregard for human-rights protections, and his economic model proved unsustainable. Starting particularly in 2009, the Chávez government targeted a number of opposition leaders for criminal prosecution. In 2013, Maduro was elected President of Venezuela as Chávez’s successor. The Maduro government has increased its intimidation, censorship, and prosecution of its critics. Notably, in September 2013, Maduro withdrew from the American Convention on Human Rights, leaving Venezuelans without access to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Many of the challenges faced by Chávez, including violence, inflation, and shortages of goods, have intensified under Maduro. It was in this context that mass protests began in January 2014. These initially non-violent demonstrations led to violence when armed pro-Government gangs and colectivos that are loyal to Maduro got involved. Since the protests of 2014, there have been intermittent protests throughout the country. However, protests increased to nearly daily occurrences in mid-2017 in light of: a botched attempt by the Supreme Court to nullify the Opposition-led National Assembly in April 2017; Government-led attacks on the democratic institutions of the country, including
Recommended publications
  • A Form of Violence Against Women
    Rev Mex Med Forense, 2019, 4(1):1-14 ISSN: 2448-8011 Transgression of sexual and reproductive rights during the professional training of female graduate doctors: a form of violence against women Original Article Juan Carlos Araujo-Cuauro 1 Received: July 12th, 2018; Accepted: September 5th, 2018; Online: January 15th, 2019 1 Physician and Lawyer. Professor of Legal Medicine. Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences. University of Zulia Law School, Venezuela Corresponding author: Juan Carlos Araujo-Cuauro, [email protected]. Araujo JC. Rev Mex Med Forense, 2019, 4(1):1-14 SUMMARY the existence of some type of regulation that forced them to abandon postgraduate Introduction. Our purpose is to determine activities because they were pregnant.. if the hospital care institutions and / or the 100% of residents who became pregnant university institutions impose repressive during their academic period (n = 100) norms on the medical graduate students were forced to abandon their teaching due to their pregnancy condition. academic care activities. 100% were Methods: We performed a prospective, unaware of legal legal mechanisms to cross-sectional observational study; 400 protect their right to reproduction and postgraduate residents of the Division of maternity. Graduate Studies of the Faculty of Conclusion: The lack of knowledge of Medicine of the University of Zulia current legal regulations on sexual and answered a survey on reproductive rights reproductive rights of postgraduate in medical residents. medical residents by the Division of Results: 70% of the simple knows the Graduate Studies of the Faculty of existence of a protection law regarding Medicine of the University of Zulia, in any type of violence against women.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the New York Times 2014 Anti-Government Protests in Venezuela
    Framing Rebellion: An Analysis of the New York Times 2014 Anti-government Protests in Venezuela A Research Paper presented by: Melanie Hughes Scotland, U.K. in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Major: Social Justice Perspectives (SJP) Specialisation: Peace & Conflict Studies Members of the Examining Committee: Dubravka Zarkov & Silke Heumann The Hague, The Netherlands, Sept. 2014 ii List of Acronyms ISS Institute of Social Studies NYT The New York Times; also referred to as the Times IMF International Monetary Fund WB World Bank IDB International Development Bank iii Acknowledgements I would like to extend a gargantuan thanks to my supervisor, Dubravka Zarkov, for her continual support and for her valuable insights into conflict in contemporary society. I would also like to express my appreciation for her sol- idarity and for keeping my extensive use of descriptive adjectives in check. I would also like to thank Silke Heumann for her reference material, which I had difficulty incorporating due to length and time constraints. iv Abstract This research explores how the mainstream news media outlet, the New York Times framed the 2014 anti-government protests in Venezuela, which erupted online in February, 2014. A content analysis revealed that the domi- nant narrative disseminated by the New York Times conveyed the misleading impression that Venezuela was yet another nation ripe for democratic revolu- tion, poised to overthrow a violently repressive regime. The Venezuelan anti- government protest(or)s were overwhelmingly framed in terms of state repression of peaceful protes(or)s, which masked their underlying causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Venezuela: Is There Life After the Barbados Talks?
    Peace in Venezuela: Is There Life after the Barbados Talks? Crisis Group Latin America Briefing N°41 Caracas/Brussels, 11 December 2019 What’s new? At least for now, Norwegian-facilitated negotiations to end Venezue- la’s presidential showdown have collapsed. Meanwhile, President Nicolás Maduro’s government has forged an agreement with minority opposition parties. Together with regional powers’ decision to define Venezuela as a threat to hemispheric security, these developments could complicate a resolution of the crisis. Why does it matter? Failure to restore political stability and socio-economic well-being in Venezuela fuels South America’s worst-ever refugee crisis, risks a low- intensity internal conflict, propagates tensions across the region and threatens to trigger military clashes with neighbouring Colombia. What should be done? Allies of the two sides should press them to overcome their reluctance and return to the negotiating table, possibly under a new format, where they should show the necessary flexibility to reach a workable agreement. I. Overview After seven rounds of formal talks in Oslo and Barbados, facilitated by the Norwe- gian government, negotiations between representatives of President Nicolás Maduro and the opposition led by Juan Guaidó – now recognised as the legitimate acting president by 58 countries, including the U.S. – broke down in mid-September. The talks had centred on a six-point agenda, agreed upon in April, to which the Maduro government had contributed just one point – the lifting of U.S. sanctions. The re- maining five were the restoration of constitutional checks and balances; conditions for the holding of elections (understood by the opposition to mean a presidential election, though that was not made explicit); the terms of a transition away from Maduro; peace and reconciliation; and post-electoral guarantees for both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • No Room for Debate the National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela
    No Room for Debate The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela July 2019 Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952 and active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realization of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession. ® No Room for Debate - The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela © Copyright International Commission of Jurists Published in July 2019 The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) permits free reproduction of extracts from any of its publications provided that due acknowledgment is given and a copy of the publication carrying the extract is sent to its headquarters at the following address: International Commission of Jurists P.O. Box 91 Rue des Bains 33 Geneva Switzerland No Room for Debate The National Constituent Assembly and the Crumbling of the Rule of Law in Venezuela This report was written by Santiago Martínez Neira, consultant to the International Commission of Jurists. Carlos Ayala, Sam Zarifi and Ian Seiderman provided legal and policy review. This report was written in Spanish and translated to English by Leslie Carmichael. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Academic Freedom in Venezuela: Legislative Im- Positions and Patterns of Discrimination Towards University Teachers and Students
    Interdisciplinary Political Studies http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps ISSN: 2039 -8573 (electronic version) IdPS, Issue 3(1) 2017: 145-169 DOI: 10.1285/ i20398573v3n1p145 Published in December 11, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE 145 Threats to Academic Freedom in Venezuela: Legislative Im- positions and Patterns of Discrimination Towards University Teachers and Students Mayda Hocevar Nelson Rivas University of Los Andes – Venezuela University of Los Andes – Venezuela David Gómez University of Zulia – Venezuela ABSTRACT As democracy is weakened and economic and social conditions deteriorate, there are increasing threats to academic freedom and autonomy in Venezuelan universities. Although academic freedom and university autonomy are legally and constitutionally recognized, public policies and ‘new legisla- tion’ undermine them. Military and paramilitary forces violently repress student protests. Frequent- ly, students are arbitrarily detained, physically attacked, and psychologically pressured through in- terrogations about their political views and their supposed "plans to destabilize the government". A parallel system of non-autonomous universities has been created under a pensée unique established by the Socialist Plans of the Nation. Discrimination has increased, both in autonomous and non- autonomous universities. This paper will expose the legal and political policies undermining aca- demic freedom in Venezuela under the governments of former president Hugo Chávez and current president Nicolás Maduro. Patterns of attacks against
    [Show full text]
  • US and Venezuelan Presidential Masculinities in the First Decade of the ‘War on Terror’
    US and Venezuelan Presidential Masculinities in the First Decade of the ‘War on Terror’ Emma Cannen Bachelor of Arts Communication Social Inquiry/Bachelor of Arts International Studies (First Class Honours) 2013 Doctoral Thesis in Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Technology, Sydney Certificate of Authorship / Originality I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and in the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of student: Date: i Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Christina Ho and Dr. Paul Allatson. Without their generous encouragement, assistance and care, I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I could not have asked for better supervisors and became a better writer and thinker thanks to both of you. I would also like to thank Chris for initially encouraging me to embark on a PhD and always expressing faith in my abilities to see it through. And to Paul, I actually enjoyed the race to the finish line thanks to you. A big shout out to my fellow PhD students (and now good friends) for thesis chats, brainstorms and freak outs over drinks, gym sessions, emails and lunches.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer Internship Orientation Manual
    Volunteer Internship Orientation Manual Authors: Mariah Branch, Dada Maheshvarananda, Brian Landever, Spencer Bailey Updated: Ju ly , 2013 1 Table of Contents A. THE PRIVEN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM....................................................................4 Welcome by Dada Maheshvarananda, Director...............................................................4 Internship.........................................................................................................................4 Our Mission, Vision and Values ......................................................................................5 Facilities...........................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Volunteer Intern......................................................................................6 Orientation.......................................................................................................................6 Learning Prout.................................................................................................................7 Your Photo and Resume for the PRIVEN Webpages......................................................7 Venezuelan News.............................................................................................................7 The 40-hour Work Week and Planning Meetings............................................................7 Publicity...........................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Cultura Política.Pmd
    CULTURA POLÍTICA E ELEMENTOS DE ANÁLISE DA POLÍTICA VENEZUELANA MINISTÉRIO DAS RELAÇÕES EXTERIORES Ministro de Estado Embaixador Celso Amorim Secretário-Geral Embaixador Antonio de Aguiar Patriota FUNDAÇÃO A LEXANDRE DE GUSMÃO Presidente Embaixador Jeronimo Moscardo INSTITUTO RIO BRANCO Diretor-Geral Embaixador Georges Lamazière A Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, instituída em 1971, é uma fundação pública vinculada ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores e tem a finalidade de levar à sociedade civil informações sobre a realidade internacional e sobre aspectos da pauta diplomática brasileira. Sua missão é promover a sensibilização da opinião pública nacional para os temas de relações internacionais e para a política externa brasileira. Ministério das Relações Exteriores Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco H Anexo II, Térreo, Sala 1 70170-900 Brasília, DF Telefones: (61) 3411-6033/6034 Fax: (61) 3411-9125 Site: www.funag.gov.br RÔMULO FIGUEIRA NEVES Cultura Política e Elementos de Análise da Política Venezuelana Brasília, 2010 Copyright © Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão Ministério das Relações Exteriores Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco H Anexo II, Térreo 70170-900 Brasília – DF Telefones: (61) 3411-6033/6034 Fax: (61) 3411-9125 Site: www.funag.gov.br E-mail: [email protected] Capa: Fernand Léger, Sem Título. Bronze, 36 x 32 cm - Doado ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores pelo Ministro Sérgio Telles em nome de Paul Haim - Livro Palácio Itamaraty. Equipe Técnica: Maria Marta Cezar Lopes Cíntia Rejane Sousa Araújo Gonçalves Erika Silva Nascimento Fabio Fonseca Rodrigues Júlia Lima Thomaz de Godoy Juliana Corrêa de Freitas Programação Visual e Diagramação: Juliana Orem e Maria Loureiro Impresso no Brasil 2010 N427c Neves, Rômulo Figueira.
    [Show full text]
  • CRACKDOWN on DISSENT Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela
    CRACKDOWN ON DISSENT Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Crackdown on Dissent Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35492 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit: http://www.hrw.org The Foro Penal (FP) or Penal Forum is a Venezuelan NGO that has worked defending human rights since 2002, offering free assistance to victims of state repression, including those arbitrarily detained, tortured, or murdered. The Penal Forum currently has a network of 200 volunteer lawyers and more than 4,000 volunteer activists, with regional representatives throughout Venezuela and also in other countries such as Argentina, Chile, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Uruguay, and the USA. Volunteers provide assistance and free legal counsel to victims, and organize campaigns for the release of political prisoners, to stop state repression, and increase the political and social cost for the Venezuelan government to use repression as a mechanism to stay in power.
    [Show full text]
  • República Bolivariana De Venezuela Ministerio Del Poder Popular Del Despacho De La Presidencia Y Seguimiento De La Gestión De Gobierno
    República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio del Poder Popular del Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno Memoria MPPDPSGG 2015 1 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio del Poder Popular del Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno Memoria MPPDPSGG 2015 2 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio del Poder Popular del Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno REPÚBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE VENEZUELA MINISTERIO DEL PODER POPULAR DEL DESPACHO DE LA PRESIDENCIA Y SEGUIMIENTO DE LA GESTIÓN DE GOBIERNO MEMORIA 2015 CARACAS, ENERO 2016 Memoria MPPDPSGG 2015 3 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio del Poder Popular del Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno Memoria MPPDPSGG 2015 4 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio del Poder Popular del Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno CONTENIDO DIRECTORIO EXPOSICIÓN GENERAL MEMORIA CAPÍTULO I: DENOMINACIÓN Y ESTRUCTURA INSTITUCIONAL I.1. Denominación I.2. Marco Normativo I.3. Estructura Organizativa I.4. Misión y Visión CAPÍTULO II: LÍNEAS DE ACCIÓN II.1. Políticas II.2. Estrategias II.3. Objetivos CAPÍTULO III: LOGROS Y OBSTÁCULOS DE LA INSTITUCIÓN III.1. Planes y Proyectos III.2. Insumos y Obstáculos III.3. Otros Aspectos Adicionales CAPÍTULO IV: GESTIÓN DE LOS ENTES Y ÓRGANOS ADSCRITOS CAPÍTULO V: LÍNEAS DE ACCIÓN PARA EL PRÓXIMO EJERCICIO FISCAL ANEXO: MEMORIA FOTOGRÁFICA Memoria MPPDPSGG 2015 5 República Bolivariana de Venezuela Ministerio
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.PRESIDENTES DE VENEZUELA (1811-2012)
    Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura ISSN: 1315-3617 [email protected] Universidad Central de Venezuela Venezuela Petit Primera, José Gregorio PRESIDENTES DE VENEZUELA (1811-2012). UN ANÁLISIS ESTADÍSTICO- DESCRIPTIVO Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, vol. XXII, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2016, pp. 47 -56 Universidad Central de Venezuela Caracas, Venezuela Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36448449003 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, 2016, Vol. XXII, No. 1 (ene-jun), pp. 47-56 recibido: 14-04-2015 / arbitrado: 14-08-2015 PRESIDENTES DE VENEZUELA (1811-2012). UN ANÁLISIS ESTADÍSTICO-DESCRIPTIVO José Gregorio Petit Primera1 IIES, UCV Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo es caracterizar a los presidentes de Venezuela desde 1811 hasta 2012 en cuanto a diferentes variables tanto cuantitativas como cualitativas. Para tal fin, se se- leccionó una muestra de 54 observaciones y se aplicó una metodología utilizando la estadística descriptiva y también como referencia el estudio que hicieran Goemans y otros (2009). El princi- pal hallazgo que se desprende de este estudio es que existen diferencias y similitudes importan- tes en los presidentes que han gobernado a Venezuela en 200 años en cuanto a las siguientes características: edad, duración en el poder, tipo de liderazgo, la manera de cómo entraron y sa- lieron al poder, así como el destino que les tocó vivir a la vuelta de un año de entregar el mando.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016
    Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs January 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43239 Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Summary Although historically the United States had close relations with Venezuela, a major oil supplier, friction in bilateral relations increased under the leftist, populist government of President Hugo Chávez (1999-2013), who died in 2013 after battling cancer. After Chávez’s death, Venezuela held presidential elections in which acting President Nicolás Maduro narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles of the opposition Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), with the opposition alleging significant irregularities. In 2014, the Maduro government violently suppressed protests and imprisoned a major opposition figure, Leopoldo López, along with others. In December 2015, the MUD initially won a two-thirds supermajority in National Assembly elections, a major defeat for the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). The Maduro government subsequently thwarted the legislature’s power by preventing three MUD representatives from taking office (denying the opposition a supermajority) and using the Supreme Court to block bills approved by the legislature. For much of 2016, opposition efforts were focused on recalling President Maduro through a national referendum, but the government slowed down the referendum process and suspended it indefinitely in October. After an appeal by Pope Francis, the government and most of the opposition (with the exception of Leopoldo López’s Popular Will party) agreed to talks mediated by the Vatican along with the former presidents of the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Panama and the head of the Union of South American Nations.
    [Show full text]