DOCSLIB.ORG

View of This Thesis As the External Examiner on the Supervisory Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View of This Thesis As the External Examiner on the Supervisory Committee University of Alberta Geology, geochronology, thermobarometry, and tectonic evolution of the Queen Maud block, Churchill craton, Nunavut, Canada by Daniel B. Tersmette A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences ©Daniel B. Tersmette Spring 2012 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Dedication For Tawny Abstract The Queen Maud block is divided into two crustal belts. The western Perry River belt is dominated by Mesoarchean to Neoarchean granitic gneisses and supracrustal rocks; it was incorporated into the Rae domain by at least 2.46 Ga. The eastern Paalliq belt is dominated by the 2.52-2.45 Ga Queen Maud granitoids and the 2.45-2.39 Ga Sherman supracrustal sequence, both of which were formed on Neoarchean crust of the Rae domain. Slave-Churchill collision and convergence occurred ca. 2.43-2.35 Ga resulting in granulite-facies metamorphism, regional scale N-S trending strike-slip shearing, and minor crustal melting in the Queen Maud block. Post-collisional magmatism occurred ca. 2.32 Ga. Between 2.3 and 2.1 Ga mafic magmatism and monazite growth occurred in the western Queen Maud block, possibly as a result of continental rifting. The 2.01-1.91 Ga Thelon Orogeny affects only the western-most Queen Maud block, where 1.93 Ga metamorphism and very weak deformation are preserved. Acknowledgements Funding for this thesis was provided by the Polar Continental Shelf Project and an NSERC discovery grant to Dr. Tom Chacko. The University of Alberta funded the author through a teaching assistantship. There are many people to thank for their support in preparing this thesis. My supervisor, Tom Chacko, deserves huge thanks for his ceaseless enthusiasm, constructive feedback, and constant support over the last two years. I would also like to thank Tom for simply allowing me to be part of such an exciting project. It is not every Master‘s student who has the opportunity to participate in such thrilling, discovery-style research as was provided by the Queen Maud block. I also thank Larry Heaman, not only for his efforts as a member of my supervisory committee but also for discussions throughout the course of the research and for assistance with zircon grain mount preparation. Thank you to Claire Currie for her review of this thesis as the external examiner on the supervisory committee. Field work was greatly aided by the staff at The Arctic Islands Lodge in Cambridge Bay; in particular, Jane Cunningham, who unknowingly became our field manager. I would also like to thank our trustworthy helicopter pilot, Guy Fisher for ensuring our safety during field activities. Rameses D‘Souza, Mark Labbe, and David Pirie all assisted in thin-section preparation and rock crushing. Zircon separation and grain mount preparation were made possible with the assistance of Barry Herchuck, Judy Schultz, and Angus Duncan. Thank you also to Sergei Matveev and De-Ann Rollings for their assistance with microprobe analysis and BSE imaging. A thank you to Rob Creasar for his work on the Sm-Nd isotopic analyses (also thank you to Tom for not making me write an additional chapter when these data became available in December, 2011). Without the assistance of Andy DuFrane, the U-Pb dating conducted for this study would not have been possible; I offer Andy a sincere thank you for his assistance during our many long days on the laser. Behind the scenes there are many more people to thank. I would like to thank Benoit Beauchamp, Dave Pattison, and Jerry Osborn from the University of Calgary. Though they may not know, their teaching and enthusiasm inspired me to further my education at the University of Alberta. My family, who have supported me and acted as a sounding board over the last two years, helped me to maintain my sanity. My fiancée, who somehow did not get tired of hearing about the Queen Maud block and who stuck with me while I lived away from home, deserves the greatest thanks. Table of Contents Title Dedication Abstract Acknowledgements Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures List of Abbreviationsix CHAPTER 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 – Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 1.2 – Geology of the Churchill Province...................................................................... 3 1.3 – The Queen Maud block ....................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 – Defining the Queen Maud block ..................................................................... 5 1.3.2 – Previous research in the Queen Maud block .................................................. 6 1.3.3 – Economic geology of the Queen Maud block .................................................. 8 CHAPTER 2 – Field relationships and petrography ................................................... 11 2.1 – Methodology ....................................................................................................... 11 2.2 – Geology of the Queen Maud block ................................................................... 12 2.2.1 – Lithology ....................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 – Tectono-metamorphism ................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 3 – U-Pb geochronology ............................................................................. 26 3.1 – Methodology ....................................................................................................... 26 3.2 – U-Pb age dating results ...................................................................................... 28 3.3 – Detrital zircon results ........................................................................................ 43 CHAPTER 4 – Geothermobarometry ........................................................................... 64 4.1 – Methodology ....................................................................................................... 64 4.1.1 – Net-transfer and Fe-Mg exchange geothermobarometry .............................. 64 4.1.2 – Reintegrated feldspar thermometry ............................................................... 66 4.2 – Results ................................................................................................................. 67 CHAPTER 5 – Evolution of the Queen Maud Block ................................................... 82 5.1 – A geological map of the Queen Maud block .................................................... 82 5.2 – Metamorphic history of the Queen Maud block ............................................. 89 5.2.1 – Archean metamorphism ................................................................................ 89 5.2.2 – Metamorphism: ca. 2.52-2.45 Ga ................................................................. 89 5.2.3 – Metamorphism: ca. 2.43-2.42 Ga ................................................................. 90 5.2.4 – Regional metamorphism: 2.39-2.35 Ga Arrowsmith Orogeny ..................... 91 5.2.5 – Post Arrowsmith metamorphism: 2.35-2.10 Ga ........................................... 92 5.2.6 – Thelon Orogeny: 2.01-1.91 Ga ..................................................................... 93 5.2.7 – The Trans-Hudson Orogen: ca. 1.9-1.8 Ga metamorphism ......................... 94 5.3 – A review of previous models for the Slave-Churchill relationship ................ 95 5.3.1 – 2.01-1.91 Ga collision of the Slave and Churchill cratons ........................... 95 5.3.2 – 2.01-1.91 Ga intracontinental orogenesis .................................................... 97 5.4 –A new model for the evolution of northwestern Laurentia ............................. 99 5.4.1 – The Archean .................................................................................................. 99 5.4.2 – Pre-collisional tectono-magmatism: 2.52-2.45 Ga ..................................... 102 5.4.3 – Slave-Churchill collision and convergence: 2.43-2.35 Ga ......................... 103 5.4.4 – Post-collision magmatism: 2.32 Ga ............................................................ 105 5.4.5 – Continental rifting ca. 2.3-2.1 Ga ............................................................... 106 5.4.6 – Thelon Orogeny: 2.01-1.91 Ga ................................................................... 106 CHAPTER 6 – Conclusion ........................................................................................... 113 6.1 – Summary ........................................................................................................... 113 6.2 – Further Research ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2019 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2019 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 12 December 2019 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 314 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2019 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (transits 149 and 167).
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Su-Pung-Er and Bayne Testimonies
    Polar Record. Page 1 of 19. © Cambridge University Press 2017. doi:10.1017/S0032247417000535 1 A comparative analysis of the Su-pung-er and Bayne testimonies related to the Franklin expedition Tom Gross 39 Wild Rose Drive, Hay River, NT, X03 0R4, Canada Russell S. Taichman Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA ([email protected]) Received May 2017 ABSTRACT. During Charles Francis Hall’s second Arctic expedition (1864–1869) to find survivors and/or documents of Sir John Franklin’s 1845 Northwest Passage expedition, two separate Inuit testimonies were recorded of a potential burial vault of a high-ranking officer. The first testimony was provided by a Boothia Inuk named Su-pung-er. The second testimony was documented by Captain Peter Bayne who, at the time, was employed by Hall. To date the vault has not been found. Recently, both the HMS Erebus and HMS Terror have been located. The discovery of these vessels was made possible, in part, by Inuit testimony of encounters with and observations of the Franklin expedition. The findings of the Erebus and Terror have significantly bolstered the view that the Inuit accurately reported their observations and interactions with the Franklin crew. The purpose of this paper is to publish in their entirety Hall’s notes from conversations with Su-pung-er focused on the vaults and to compare these observations to those reported in the Bayne testimony. It is our hope that in so doing the final major archaeological site of the Franklin expedition may be located.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Geospatial Approach to Evaluate the Impacts of Shipping Activity on Marine Mammals and Fish in Arctic Canada
    Using a Geospatial Approach to Evaluate the Impacts of Shipping Activity on Marine Mammals and Fish in Arctic Canada Thesis Master of Science in Geography with Specialization in Science, Society and Policy Jenna Joyce April 2018 Submitted to: Dr. Jackie Dawson, Supervisor, Department of Geography, University of Ottawa Dr. Luke Copland, Department of Geography, University of Ottawa Dr. Michael Sawada, Department of Geography, University of Ottawa Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics University of Ottawa © Jenna Joyce, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 Abstract A loss in sea ice cover, primarily attributed to climate change, is increasing the accessibility and navigability of the Arctic Ocean. This increased accessibility of the Canadian Arctic, and in particular the Northwest Passage, presents important global and national shipping and development opportunities. However, increased shipping in the region also present challenges related to the environmental sustainability, sovereignty and safety, and cultural sustainability. The Low Impact Shipping Corridors (the Corridors) is currently the foundational framework for governing ship traffic within the Canadian Arctic. However, the Corridors were largely established based on historic traffic patterns and thus they do not fully consider important areas for marine mammals and fish in the region. This research addresses this important research gap by spatially identifying important areas for marine mammals and fish in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut using both Traditional Knowledge and western science, evaluating ship tracks from 1990-2015, and geospatially identifying and evaluating areas of potential disturbance for marine mammals and fish related to vessel noise from different ship types transiting the Corridors within the study region. The results of this study indicate that all vessel types have the potential to cause behavioural disturbance to marine mammals and fish when navigating through these important wildlife areas, and that louder vessels (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, NO.3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P.292 – 308 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4733 Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1 (Received 31 January 2018; accepted in revised form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT. In 1855 a parliamentary committee concluded that Robert McClure deserved to be rewarded as the discoverer of a Northwest Passage. Since then, various writers have put forward rival claims on behalf of Sir John Franklin, John Rae, and Roald Amundsen. This article examines the process of 19th-century European exploration in the Arctic Archipelago, the definition of discovering a passage that prevailed at the time, and the arguments for and against the various contenders. It concludes that while no one explorer was “the” discoverer, McClure’s achievement deserves reconsideration. Key words: Northwest Passage; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen RÉSUMÉ. En 1855, un comité parlementaire a conclu que Robert McClure méritait de recevoir le titre de découvreur d’un passage du Nord-Ouest. Depuis lors, diverses personnes ont avancé des prétentions rivales à l’endroit de Sir John Franklin, de John Rae et de Roald Amundsen. Cet article se penche sur l’exploration européenne de l’archipel Arctique au XIXe siècle, sur la définition de la découverte d’un passage en vigueur à l’époque, de même que sur les arguments pour et contre les divers prétendants au titre. Nous concluons en affirmant que même si aucun des explorateurs n’a été « le » découvreur, les réalisations de Robert McClure méritent d’être considérées de nouveau. Mots clés : passage du Nord-Ouest; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen Traduit pour la revue Arctic par Nicole Giguère.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC Exploration the SEARCH for FRANKLIN
    CATALOGUE THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT ARCTIC EXPLORATION & THE SeaRCH FOR FRANKLIN WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 Temple Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 789-8081 A Note This catalogue is devoted to Arctic exploration, the search for the Northwest Passage, and the later search for Sir John Franklin. It features many volumes from a distinguished private collection recently purchased by us, and only a few of the items here have appeared in previous catalogues. Notable works are the famous Drage account of 1749, many of the works of naturalist/explorer Sir John Richardson, many of the accounts of Franklin search expeditions from the 1850s, a lovely set of Parry’s voyages, a large number of the Admiralty “Blue Books” related to the search for Franklin, and many other classic narratives. This is one of 75 copies of this catalogue specially printed in color. Available on request or via our website are our recent catalogues: 320 Manuscripts & Archives, 322 Forty Years a Bookseller, 323 For Readers of All Ages: Recent Acquisitions in Americana, 324 American Military History, 326 Travellers & the American Scene, and 327 World Travel & Voyages; Bulletins 36 American Views & Cartography, 37 Flat: Single Sig- nificant Sheets, 38 Images of the American West, and 39 Manuscripts; e-lists (only available on our website) The Annex Flat Files: An Illustrated Americana Miscellany, Here a Map, There a Map, Everywhere a Map..., and Original Works of Art, and many more topical lists. Some of our catalogues, as well as some recent topical lists, are now posted on the internet at www.reeseco.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    Chapter 13 The Muskrats of North America Other Than Ondatra zibethicus zibethicus THE FIFTEEN RECOGNIZED FORMS of muskrats having North American ranges outside of the range of 0. z. zibethicus show many differences as to population status, habitats, and geographical distribution. Of these other muskrats, 0. z. cinnamominus - the subspecies with which, next to zibethicus, I have had the most experience - can be notable for its low densities over tremendous areas of the arid and semiarid Great Plains; it may hardly be represented at all for stretches of hundreds of miles, yet seldom does it fail nominally to hold essentially its regular range, and it often reaches typical muskrat abundance m suitable marsh or stream habitats. "\\!estward from the range of cinnamominus extend the ranges of the evidently closely related mergens, occipitalis, and osoyoosensis. The one of these having the smallest range, occipitalis, &hows some behavior differences, whereas the widely distributed osoyoosensis is probably as versatile with respect to habitats and climate as any musk­ rat subspecies, including zibethicus. It is true that zibethicus in northern Ontario and osoyoosensis at high altitudes in western United States illustrate muskrat adaptability to long cold winters and marginal habitats as well as do any of what may be called the true northern muskrats - obscurus, aquilonius, a/bus, zalophus, and spatulatus. Nevertheless, much may still be learned from this latter group about what constitutes habitability of northern muskrat range and what muskrats can there endure in the way of edge-of-range phenomena. The subspecies macrodon, rivalicius, ripensis, bernardi, goldmani, and pallidus are all natives of warm climates and all have restricted geographic ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism
    NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut Ministère de l’Environnement Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY • Gjoa Haven INVENTORY RESOURCE COASTAL NUNAVUT Ministère de l’Environnement Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory – Gjoa Haven 2011 Department of Environment Fisheries and Sealing Division Box 1000 Station 1310 Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 GJOA HAVEN Inventory deliverables include: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • A final report summarizing all of the activities This report is derived from the Hamlet of Gjoa Haven undertaken as part of this project; and represents one component of the Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory (NCRI). “Coastal inventory”, as used • Provision of the coastal resource inventory in a GIS here, refers to the collection of information on coastal database; resources and activities gained from community interviews, research, reports, maps, and other resources. This data is • Large-format resource inventory maps for the Hamlet presented in a series of maps. of Gjoa Haven, Nunavut; and Coastal resource inventories have been conducted in • Key recommendations on both the use of this study as many jurisdictions throughout Canada, notably along the well as future initiatives. Atlantic and Pacific coasts. These inventories have been used as a means of gathering reliable information on During the course of this project, Gjoa Haven was visited on coastal resources to facilitate their strategic assessment, two occasions:
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Granite-Related Uranium Deposits in The
    Ore Geology Reviews 117 (2020) 103319 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Comparison of granite-related uranium deposits in the Beaverlodge district (Canada) and South China – A common control of mineralization by coupled T shallow and deep-seated geologic processes in an extensional setting ⁎ Guoxiang Chia, , Kenneth Ashtonb, Teng Dengc, Deru Xuc, Zenghua Lic, Hao Songd, Rong Lianga, Jacklyn Kennicotta a Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada b Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada c State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, China d Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province of Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Many uranium deposits are related to granitic rocks, but the mineralization ages are much younger, thus ex- Granite-related cluding a direct magmatic-hydrothermal link between the mineralization and the granites. Two such examples Uranium deposits are the Proterozoic “vein-type” uranium deposits in the Beaverlodge district in Canada and the Mesozoic granite- Beaverlodge related uranium deposits in South China. Both areas have been extensively studied, but the critical factors that South China control the mineralization remain unclear. Red bed basin The uranium mineralization in the Beaverlodge district occurs in quartz – carbonate ± albite veins and Coupled control breccias developed within and near major deformation zones, and are mainly hosted by ca. 2.33 – 1.90 Ga granitic rocks and ca. 2.33 Ga Murmac Bay Group amphibolite. These rocks are unconformably overlain by the Martin Lake Basin, which was formed during a period of regional extension in the later stage of the Trans- Hudson orogeny and is filled with red beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithospheric Architecture Beneath Hudson Bay 10.1002/2015GC005845 Robert W
    PUBLICATIONS Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems RESEARCH ARTICLE Lithospheric architecture beneath Hudson Bay 10.1002/2015GC005845 Robert W. Porritt1, Meghan S. Miller1, and Fiona A. Darbyshire2 Special Section: 1 2 The Lithosphere- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA, Centre de recherche asthenosphere System GEOTOP, UniversiteduQu ebec a Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Key Points: Abstract Hudson Bay overlies some of the thickest Precambrian lithosphere on Earth, whose internal The thick lithosphere of Hudson Bay has significant structural variation structures contain important clues to the earliest workings of plate formation. The terminal collision, the We directly image the thermal Trans-Hudson Orogen, brought together the Western Churchill craton to the northwest and the Superior blanketing on the asthenosphere craton to the southeast. These two Archean cratons along with the Paleo-Proterozoic Trans-Hudson inter- The lithospheric thickness of Hudson Bay is 200–350 km nides, form the core of the North American craton. We use S to P converted wave imaging and absolute shear velocity information from a joint inversion of P to S receiver functions, new ambient noise derived Supporting Information: phase velocities, and teleseismic phase velocities to investigate this region and determine both the thick- Supporting Information S1 ness of the lithosphere and the presence of internal discontinuities. The lithosphere under central Hudson Software S1 Bay approaches 350 km thick but is thinner (200–250 km) around the periphery of the Bay. Furthermore, the amplitude of the LAB conversion from the S receiver functions is unusually large for a craton, suggesting Correspondence to: a large thermal contrast across the LAB, which we interpret as direct evidence of the thermal insulation R.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic History of the Southwestern Margin of the Rae Province in Northwestern Saskatchewan
    Tectonic History of the Southwestern Margin of the Rae Province in Northwestern Saskatchewan K.E. Ashton* and C.D. Card Ministry of Energy and Resources, Northern Geological Survey, 200-2101 Scarth Street, Regina, SK S4P 2H9 e-mail: [email protected]; R.P. Hartlaub, Department of Mining Technology, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Burnaby, BC V5G 3H2; K.M. Bethune, Department of Geology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2; and N. Rayner, Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8 Summary The southwestern Rae margin in northwestern Saskatchewan includes 3.01-2.94 Ga and 2.62- 2.58 Ga granitoids typical of the Rae Province. The Arrowsmith Orogen produced 2.37 Ga metamorphism and 2.33-2.30 Ga post-collisional granitoid rocks. Initial deposition of the Murmac Bay group at about 2.33 Ga was derived from an unknown Paleo- to Mesoarchean source; higher stratigraphic levels record diverse locally exposed rocks and a 2.2-2.0 Ga suite possibly exposed to the west. Multiple terrane accretions during the Taltson Orogen produced a 1.94-1.92 Ga southeast-striking regional foliation, which was overprinted by a 1.91-1.90 Ga northeast-striking fabric associated with tectonism along the Snowbird Tectonic Zone. Circa 1.84-1.83 Ga terrane accretion farther west and terminal collision in the Trans-Hudson Orogen resulted in widespread faulting, deposition of the Martin Group, and the historic Beaverlodge uranium and gold deposits. Abstract Integration of data from the southwestern margin of the Rae Province in Saskatchewan and the Taltson Magmatic Zone to the west is shedding more light on the region’s tectonic history.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Th Annual Report, Department of Fisheries and Marine (1907)
    7 ) 7-8 EDWARDVI!. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 22 A. 1908 FORTIETI-IANNUAL REPORT ')F THE BEPRTET OF HRINE kNB FISIIERIES 1907 FISIIEBIES PRINTED BYORDERuF PARLIAMENT OTTAWA PRINTED BY S. E. DAWSON. PRINTER TO THE KINGS MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1907 [No. 22—190S. 7-8 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 22 A. 1908 ToHis Excellency the Right Ilonourable SIR ALBERT HENRY GEORGE, EARL GREY, Viscount Howick, Baron Grey of Howick, a Baronet, G.C.if.G., bc,,&c.,t'c., Governor General of Canada, MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY I have the honour to submit herewith, for the information of Your Excellency and the legislature of Canada, the Fortieth Annual Report of the Department of Marine aud Fisheries, Fisheries Branch. I have the honour to be, Your Excellency's most obedient servant, L. P. BRODETJR, Minister of Marine and Fisheries. DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND FIHERLES, OTTAWA, November, 1907 7-8 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL. PAPER No. 22 A. 19O ALPHABETICALINDEX TO THE FIIIERIES REPORT 1907. A PAGE. Alberta, report of Inspector 207, 211 Antigonish County, N.S., returns 56 Areas—extent of water—or coast xxv Armstrong, Vm., Hatchery officer, Newcastle, Ont 261 B Baldwin's Mills, rearing ponds 265 Bait Freezer system in Canada xl Bait, cold storage of, by Peter Macfarlane 287 Black Bass, breeding ponds 244 Barker, \Vin. H., Hatchery Officer, B.C 251; Bay View lobster hatchery, N.S 276 Bedford hatchery, N.S 273 Behring Sea Question, remarks xl Sealing Fleet of 1906 229 Belliveau, A. H., Inspector's reports xlix, 147 Bertram, A. C., Inspector of Cape Breton Island, reports xlii, 30 Biological Marine Stations Lake Georgian Bay and in B.C xxi Block House Point Hatchery, P.E.
    [Show full text]