44618 History Newsletter 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fantastic Archaeology and Pseudoscience Lost Tribes, Sunken Continents, and Ancient Astronauts
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY TAOS SUMMER TERM 2019 ANTH 3334: FANTASTIC ARCHAEOLOGY AND PSEUDOSCIENCE LOST TRIBES, SUNKEN CONTINENTS, AND ANCIENT ASTRONAUTS Professor: Whitney A. Goodwin, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Anthropology Contact: [email protected] Course Time: Monday-Friday, 9:00am-12:00pm, 1:00-4:00pm Course Location: Fort Burgwin Archaeology Laboratory Office Hours: By appointment COURSE DESCRIPTION: Archaeology, like any other science, is no stranger to today’s world of half-truths and ‘alternative facts’. Fantastic claims have been made about everything in the field, from crystal skulls to entire civilizations. In this course, you will acquire the tools to form critical opinions about archaeological phenomena and become able to take apart shaky arguments based on incomplete, false or nonexistent evidence. At the same time, you will learn that science is never straightforward, neat, and simple. When it comes to many issues, legitimate controversies among scientists about what is known and what is knowable can turn into speculations about the past that go beyond any possibility of documentation. In fact, you will learn that sometimes these frontiers between the legitimate and the lunatic are the most dynamic and interesting of all. In this course we will also consider, thematically and periodically, the difference between legitimate controversy within scientific archaeology, what is termed a “Paradigm controversy”, and controversy pitting scientists against pseudoscientists and charlatans. As Ken Feder describes in the first two chapters of his book, Frauds, Myths and Mysteries, a controversy between legitimate scientists operates by clear and consistent rules of evidence, even if those scientists have very different interpretations of evidence. -
Is the Truth Down There?: Cultural Heritage Conflict and the Politics of Archaeological Authority
IS THE TRUTH DOWN THERE?: CULTURAL HERITAGE CONFLICT AND THE POLITICS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AUTHORITY IAN BARBER PUBLIC HISTORY REVIEW, VOL 13, 2006, PP143-154 enerally it is acknowledged that conflict is axiomatic in any contemporary system of heritage (or cultural) resource management.1 Tunbridge and G Ashworth2 argue that dissonance (‘a discordance or a lack of agreement and consistency’) is ‘intrinsic’ to heritage, since ‘selection is inevitable’ and ‘any creation of heritage from the past disinherits someone [else] completely or partially, actively or potentially’. In this process there may be conflict between stakeholders who feel alienated from the physical reference points of their own past, and those decision-makers who would modify or appropriate that past. In overview, the selection pressures that are at the core of cultural heritage conflicts are complex and wide-ranging. Disagreement spans differences over the treatment and care of sites through to the targeted destruction of cultural property and associated customary communities.3 Affected communities may contest decisions that seem to dismiss their own heritage sites and associated narratives and practices. At the extreme end of the scale, these differences may lead to sectarian violence and the destruction of cultural property. Conflict can also occur between cultural heritage practitioners themselves over how, and even whether, to research the contested past.4 The appeal of the material archaeological record is often enhanced where the past is referenced in postcolonial or nationalist conflicts. In these disputes, archaeologists may be found as expert witnesses in legal proceedings (for example, Sutton’s article in this volume) or as public advocates for or against communities with customary or other cultural heritage associations.5 Newly discovered archaeological features and artifacts may be given considerable if tendentious weight or be subject to critical scrutiny and dismissal. -
Faculty Publications and Presentations 2010-11
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS JULY 1, 2010 – JUNE 30, 2011 Table of Contents Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences………………………………….. Page 3 School of Architecture…………………………………... Page 125 Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences…………………. Page 133 Walton College of Business……………………………... Page 253 College of Education and Health Professions…………… Page 270 College of Engineering…………………………………... Page 301 School of Law……………………………………………. Page 365 University Libraries……………………………………… Page 375 BUMPERS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND LIFE SCIENCES Agricultural Economic and Agribusiness Alviola IV, P. A., and O. Capps, Jr. 2010 “Household Demand Analysis of Organic and Conventional Fluid Milk in the United States Based on the 2004 Nielsen Homescan Panel.” Agribusiness: an International Journal 26(3):369-388. Chang, Hung-Hao and Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr. 2010. “Childhood Obesity and Unhappiness: The Influence of Soft Drinks and Fast Food Consumption.” J Happiness Stud 11:261–275. DOI 10.1007/s10902-009-9139-4 Das, Biswa R., and Daniel V. Rainey. 2010. "Agritourism in the Arkansas Delta Byways: Assessing the Economic Impacts." International Journal of Tourism Research 12(3): 265-280. Dixon, Bruce L., Bruce L. Ahrendsen, Aiko O. Landerito, Sandra J. Hamm, and Diana M. Danforth. 2010. “Determinants of FSA Direct Loan Borrowers’ Financial Improvement and Loan Servicing Actions.” Journal of Agribusiness 28,2 (Fall):131-149. Drichoutis, Andreas C., Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., Panagiotis Lazaridis. 2010. “Do Reference Values Matter? Some Notes and Extensions on ‘‘Income and Happiness Across Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31:479–486. Flanders, Archie and Eric J. Wailes. 2010. “ECONOMICS AND MARKETING: Comparison of ACRE and DCP Programs with Simulation Analysis of Arkansas Delta Cotton and Rotation Crops.” The Journal of Cotton Science 14:26–33. -
Demystifying Discourse Analysis for Archaeology Students
Journal of Archaeology and Education Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 1 June 2018 Say What?: Demystifying Discourse Analysis for Archaeology Students Cynthia L. Van Gilder Saint Mary's College of California, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/jae Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Van Gilder, Cynthia L. 2018 Say What?: Demystifying Discourse Analysis for Archaeology Students. Journal of Archaeology and Education 2 Available at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/jae/vol2/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Archaeology and Education by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Van Gilder: Demystifying Discourse Analysis Most archaeology instructors are eager to have their students appreciate that the study of the past is relevant to the present. In fact, most current introductory textbooks include a section, however brief it may be, on the socio-politics of archaeology. These discussions are usually framed around how ideas about the past have been used to justify abuse (e.g., Nazi archaeology to support an Aryan homeland), or how the involvement of descendant communities in research is now considered best practice in the field (e.g., NAGPRA, community based archaeology). One of the most powerful tools for understanding how what we say about the past makes a difference in the present is discourse analysis. Ultimately, archaeologists communicate their findings via discourses: in reports, articles, books, museum exhibits, documentaries, podcasts, websites, and even occasionally fictional writings. -
University of Groningen Das SS-Ahnenerbe Und Die
University of Groningen Das SS-Ahnenerbe und die Rassifizierung der transnationalen Strukturen in der europäischen Vor- und Frühgeschichtsforschung Eickhoff, Martijn; Schlegelmilch, Dana Published in: Archäologie in Österreich 1938–1945 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Eickhoff, M., & Schlegelmilch, D. (2020). Das SS-Ahnenerbe und die Rassifizierung der transnationalen Strukturen in der europäischen Vor- und Frühgeschichtsforschung. In D. Modl, & K. Peitler (editors), Archäologie in Österreich 1938–1945: Beiträge zum internationalen Symposium vom 27. bis 29. April 2015 am Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz (blz. 48-71). (Forschungen zur geschichtlichen Landeskunde der Steiermark; Nr. 79). Historische Landeskommission für Steiermark. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. -
Thewestfield Leader During 1966 the Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper in Union County
DRIVE TO EXIST THEWESTFIELD LEADER DURING 1966 THE LEADING AND MOST WIDELY CIRCULATED WEEKLY NEWSPAPER IN UNION COUNTY Published Every Thursday 32 Pages—10 Cent* WESTFIELD^ NEW JERSEY, THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 1966 School Pay Scales, Council OKs Budget; Leaves Approved Fife Again Dissents Girls! Sign Up Increases P Keglstratloit for girls soflbalt For In New Budget Open House Tax Rate Seen fans been extended until Satur- The Hoard of Kducalion Tuesday Salary Ordinances day. At the l'lay Fair, Sport night approved two teacher resigna- WcsUield families are Invited Center and YWl'A cards are tions, the appointment of six to the to an open house at the West- Up 26 Points available for girls aged 9-H, faculty, a schedule of financial pro- Provide Increases field Rescue Squad headquarters with 14 year olds eligible for Uie visions for teacher, office personnel, an Spring St. Sunday from 2 to Westfield's town budget first lime this year. All cards custodians and maintenance staff, 4 p.m. Guided tours of the fa- for 1966 calling for an out- must be In the hands of Uie salaries for staff personnel and a For Employees cilities will be offered, as well lay of $2,364,307 for muni- League )>y Saturday. salary guide for school nurses. displays und demonstrations of cipal purposes, an increase In addition the board rcappointed Town Council introduced two ordi- ItesuscI -Annie, the squad's of $40,000 over last year, Bert L. Itucbcr as custodian of the nances Tuesday night providing pay breathing dummy, and other and a total projected tax equipment. -
199 5!Llnnua{ 2{F,Port
...,._I~_.· ·.... ~=:atMby~eQmgr~sl889f».'.·_· .-.i . ·. , . ·I . ' . 400 A Street, $E Washington, DC 20003 1995!llnnua{ 2{f,port Compilea for tlie Counci£ 2001 Compi[etf 6y !Miriam 'E. !lfauss 'Wi.tli assistance from Cliristian J21.. :H.a£e anti !l(.icliartf '.Botui :For tlie Council, 2001 1995 Annual Report of the American Historical Association Table of Contents Report of the Executive Director .................................................................................. 2 1995 Report of the Vice President of the AHA Professional Division .......................... 7 1995 Report of the Vice President of the AHA Research Division ............................. 11 1995 Report of the Vice President of the AHA Teaching Division ............................. 14 Report of the Editor, American Historical Review ...................................................... 16 Report of the 1995 Program Committee ..................................................................... 19 Report of the 1995 Nominating Committee ................................................................ 22 1995 and 1996 Report of the Committee on Women Historians ................................ 27 Report of the 1995 Committee on Minority Historians ............................................... 29 Minutes of the Council Meeting, January 5, 1995 ...................................................... 31 Minutes of the Council Meeting, January 8, 1995 ...................................................... 44 Minutes of the Council Meeting, May 6-7, 1995 ....................................................... -
Pseudo-Archaeology: the Appropriation and Commercialization of Cultural Heritage," Spectrum: Vol
Recommended Citation Bassett, Alecia (2013) "Pseudo-archaeology: The Appropriation and Commercialization of Cultural Heritage," Spectrum: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholars.unh.edu/spectrum/vol3/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals and Publications at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Spectrum by an authorized editor of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spectrum Volume 3 Issue 1 Fall 2013 Article 6 10-1-2013 Pseudo-archaeology: The Appropriation and Commercialization of Cultural Heritage Alecia Bassett University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/spectrum Bassett: Pseudo-archaeology: The Appropriation and Commercialization of Cu PSEUDO-ARCHAEOLOGY: THE APPROPRIATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE Alecia Bassett Heritage can be defined as the use of the past to construct ideas about identity in the present. The past that this definition references is most commonly linked to tangible objects, and therefore archaeological artifacts. As such, archaeology becomes inexorably linked with cultural heritage in that many cultures are dependent on archaeological objects helping them continue to define their identity. However, there are various threats to cultural heritage, especially as more groups of peoples attempt to evoke objects as belonging to their own cultural background. This has been happening throughout history, but in the nineteenth-century pseudo-archaeology became a new threat. Pseudo- archaeology does not fall in line with academic archaeology and often attempts to appropriate or commercialize heritage to ends that are not scientific or beneficial to the conservation of heritage. -
Who Owns the Past? SYLLABUS DRAFT
HRS 356 Who Owns the Past? SYLLABUS DRAFT Instructor Dr. Erin Walcek Averett Office LECA 114 Email [email protected] Phone 402.280.2261 Lecture TR Office Hours TBA, and by appointment Course Description This course explores the dynamic issues surrounding the political use of the past with a focus on archaeological and artistic cultural monuments in the ancient Mediterranean and Near East. The way the past is studied, interpreted, presented, and conserved is becoming an increasingly hot topic in today’s politicized global environment. Modern political ideologies such as colonialism and nationalism, wars, poverty, and a thriving illicit antiquities market are closely intertwined with how past cultural heritage is collected, interpreted, presented, and maintained. This class will analyze the political use of the past with a focus on the 19th – 21st centuries through student presentation and discussion. The class format is seminar-style, with emphasis on discussion, debate, and active student learning. Issues to be addressed will include: why preserve the past, and in what form? How has past cultural heritage been used and abused for political purposes in different historical and cultural contexts? How do museums, collections, restitution of cultural property, and the illicit traffic in artifacts contribute to this situation? What solutions have been tried or proposed to mitigate the ongoing struggle for control of the past? Students are encouraged to apply these principles to other global cultures in their individual research projects. -
'Pimpernel' Smith Decades Before Indiana Jones First Cocked a Snook
‘Pimpernel’ Smith Decades before Indiana Jones first cocked a snook at Hitler, Professor Horatio Smith of Cambridge University paved the way for Nazi-punching daredevil archaeologists on the silver screen. Now largely forgotten, Leslie Howard’s 1941 movie Pimpernel Smith is a classic of British wartime propaganda, one that inspired real-life resistance to the Nazi Holocaust. A spectre is haunting Nazi-occupied Europe. As the Gestapo hunt down dissident scientists and artists they find their victims gone – smuggled to safety by a mysterious rescuer known as The Shadow. As the hero grows more daring and his fame spreads, Gestapo General von Graum (Francis Sullivan) vows to capture him. Soon his suspicions fall on Professor Horatio Smith (Leslie Howard), a mild-mannered Cambridge archaeologist. Smith and his students are hard at work on their dig, looking for evidence of Germany’s ancient Aryan culture. But are Smith and his excavation really all that they seem? Best known for his portrayal of the mildly tragic Ashley Wilkes in Gone with the Wind, British actor Leslie Howard was at the peak of his fame when he produced, directed and starred in Pimpernel Smith. By then a Hollywood star, Howard had returned to Britain in 1939, determined to contribute to the fight against the Nazis. In 1934 Howard had starred as Sir Percy Blakeney in The Scarlet Pimpernel, based on the novels of Baroness Orczy. Like Bruce Wayne and Batman, Blakeney hid his identity as the scourge of Revolutionary France behind a foppish, foolish façade. As the leader of the twenty-strong ‘League of the Scarlet Pimpernel’ he and his men rescued French nobles from Robespierre’s guillotine with feats of swordsmanship, cunning, and derring-do. -
10 10 Bizarre Stories of Nazi Archaeology
19/7/2015 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology - Listverse PREVIOUS WEIRD STUFF 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology DAVID TORMSEN JULY 18, 2015 The National Socialists were obsessed with their bizarre racial theories and desperate to subvert the science of archaeology to support the notion of a pure race of ancient Aryan supermen. In the 1930s, the two main organizations devoted to Nazi pseudoarchaeology were the SS Ahnenerbe, dominated by Heinrich Himmler, and the Amt Rosenberg, an academic Nazi Party organization run by Alfred Rosenberg. They struggled for power, and the Ahnenerbe was eventually triumphant, but both organizations organized some loopy expeditions. We wrote recently about the bizarre expedition by the SS to Tibet to explore the history of the mythical Aryan race. Here are 10 more tales of archaeology gone badly wrong. Featured image credit: German Federal Archives Tiwanaku 10 Photo credit: Gestaltenohneverstand Photo via Wikipedia Photo credit: Pko http://listverse.com/2015/07/18/10-bizarre-stories-of-nazi-archaeology/ 1/26 19/7/2015 10 Bizarre Stories Of Nazi Archaeology - Listverse SS officer Edmund Kiss spent time in Bolivia in the 1920s, becoming friendly with Austrian adventurer and rubber maker Arthur Posnansky. Posnansky was involved with excavating the ancient city of Tiwanaku in the Altiplano region, characterized by its massive stone blacks and elaborate carvings, and he despised the local people. Also unwilling to believe that the ruins were built by the indigenous Aymara people, Kiss developed a wild theory that the city was actually built by wayward Nordic Atlanteans one million years ago; they subdued the local inhabitants before erecting the spectacular city. -
Discussion Document 2
Discussion Document No discipline is politically neutral. However, in its pursuit of the ancient past archaeology seems to have been particularly prone to abuse in the service of political objectives. In the following, J. Laurence Hare describes how valuable it was to Nazi propagandists during the Third Reich. Prehistoric archaeology was an especially significant pursuit in the Third Reich. Studies of ancient remains aided in the appropriation of symbols and themes from the distant past, which Nazi propagandists used to affirm the character of the German people (Volk) and the greatness of the Germanic race (Rasse). During the Second World War, the interpretation of artefacts and sites helped justify Nazi conquests and informed German policies in zones of occupation. Finally, prehistoric archaeology catered to the private interests of such party leaders as Heinrich Himmler and Alfred Rosenberg, whose fascination with German prehistory led them to fund research on texts and artefacts and to act as patrons for prominent excavation projects. Such an emphasis on ancient Germanic peoples might naturally imply a focus on research within the nation’s borders. As such, we might be tempted to see it as part of a tradition of insularity within German prehistoric archaeology, which in the nineteenth century yielded a staunch opposition in some quarters to such outside innovations as the Three-Age System. Moreover, it might lead us to connect archaeology in the 1930s to a general hostility to ‘internationalism’ in Nazi science policy, which generally placed greater value on ‘German’ research from ‘Aryan’ scholars. Yet, it turns out, ‘Nazi archaeology’ was a decidedly international affair.