DOCSLIB.ORG

S NDP: Mulcair's Victory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S NDP: Mulcair's Victory CANADA’S NDP: Mulcair’s Victory: What Does It Mean? By Global Research Region: Canada Global Research, April 06, 2012 Theme: History Socialist Project 6 April 2012 On March 24, the membership of the Federal New Democratic Party (NDP) elected Thomas Mulcair to succeed the late Jack Layton as their national leader, who tragically died of cancer in August 2011. With about 65,000 of the party’s 130,000 members participating in the leadership election, Mulcair prevailed over runner-up Brian Topp on thefourth ballot, receiving 57 per cent of votes cast. Mulcair, who was widely expected to prevail, takes over the NDP that had surged to Official Opposition in the Canadian Parliament in the ‘orange wave’ in the May 2011 election under the popular and charismatic Layton. For the first time in the party’s history, the forming of an NDP government is within the realm of possibility. Layton’s Most Important Recruit Layton, a native of Quebec, had made winning seats in Quebec a priority under his leadership. In 2007, Layton recruited Mulcair to run for the NDP and appointed him as the party’s Quebec Lieutenant; Mulcair had given a speech at the party’s convention in Quebec City the previous year. Mulcair was a popular Quebec Cabinet minister in the Liberal government of Jean Charest. In June 2006, Mulcair was removed from his position as Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks due to his opposition to the selloff of lands to private condominium developers. Mulcair was elected in a by-election in September 2007 in the longtime ‘safe’ Liberal riding of Outremont in Montreal; he was re- elected in the 2008 federal election, the first New Democrat to win a seat in Quebec in a general election. Upon entering Parliament, Layton appointed Mulcair as one of the party’s Deputy Leaders, along with left-wing Vancouver MP Libby Davies. In the 2011 election, the NDP had a historic breakthrough in Quebec, winning 59 of its 75 seats and reducing the Bloc Québécois (BQ), which had held most of the seats in Quebec since 1993, to just four seats; even BQ leader Gilles Duceppe went down to defeat. Layton targeted Bloc supporters by appealing to a common social democratic outlook as well to an ‘asymmetrical federalism’ that would respect Quebec’s place in Canada; by uniting with progressives in English Canada behind the NDP, it was argued, the Conservative government of Stephen Harper, extremely unpopular in Quebec, could be defeated. Mulcair campaigned for the NDP throughout Quebec and was widely credited for playing a key role in the ‘orange wave.’ Having won 103 seats (of 308) in Parliament and over 30 per cent of the popular vote, the NDP became the Official Opposition, not only wiping out the Bloc in Quebec, but achieving their longtime goal of leapfrogging over the Liberal Party and replacing them as the main party of the centre-left; the Liberals under the disastrous leadership of Michael Ignatieff | 1 were reduced to just 34 seats. Although the Conservatives only won 5 seats in Quebec, they won overwhelmingly in English Canada and obtained a majority government. It was indeed a bittersweet result for many Canadian progressives. And with the death of Layton, whether the party’s gains in Quebec could be sustained remained very much in question. The Leadership Contest The leadership race officially began on September 15, 2011, with the convention to be held in Toronto on March 23-24, 2012. It was based on a One Member One Vote system of voting; the 25 per cent vote delegated to affiliated trade unions had been removed by the party’s federal executive. About 80 per cent of members who participated cast their votes in advance online or by mail based on a ranked ballot; the rest were cast ‘live’ by convention delegates and voters online. The party executive agreed to have a longer leadership race in order to allow leadership candidates to sign up new members in Quebec, where membership numbers were low and no provincial branch exists. There were seven candidates in the race, including Mulcair, key party strategist Brian Topp, MPs Peggy Nash (Parkdale-High Park, ON), Nathan Cullen (Skeena-Bulkley Valley, BC), Paul Dewar (Ottawa Centre, ON) and Niki Ashton (Churchill, MB), and Nova Scotia pharmacist and businessman Martin Singh. Two other MPs who were elected in 2011, respected First Nations leader Romeo Saganash (Abiti-Baie-James-Nunavik-Eeyou, QC) and former Nova Scotia NDP leader Robert Chisholm (Dartmouth-Cole Harbour, NS), withdrew from the race. Brian Topp was the first to declare his candidacy. Topp was a key figure under Layton, serving as national campaign director in the 2006 and 2008 elections, senior adviser to Layton in the 2011 election, and among the negotiators of the attempted Liberal-NDP coalition in the fall of 2008; he was elected president of the party in June 2011. He had previously served as deputy chief of staff to the government of Roy Romanow in Saskatchewan in the 1990s. Topp had the support of much of the party establishment, most notably from former leader and elder statesmanEd Broadbent, but also received an endorsement from left-wing icon Libby Davies. In spite of his role in the ‘modernization’ of the federal NDP as well as with the ‘Third Way’ Romanow government, Topp repackaged himself as a defender of traditional social democracy. Most notably, Topp came out in support of raising taxes on wealthy Canadians and corporations, even though under Layton the party had largely embraced anti-tax populism. For many, this ‘left turn’ came across as insincere and opportunistic. Topp also came under heavy criticism for never having been elected to office. Mulcair, in contrast, pursued more centrist themes in his campaign. Mulcair cited the Third Way government of Gary Doer in Manitoba as the model he wished to emulate. He repeatedly criticized the NDP for ‘outdated’ language and told theGlobe and Mail unlike other candidates (particularly Topp), he would not be ‘beholden’ to unions. In aninterview with the Globe and Mail, Mr. Mulcair recounted how he informed the Canadian national director of the Steelworkers, Ken Neumann, that he opposed a reserved voting block for unions at the NDP leadership convention in March: “It was quite clear he wasn’t used to being told ‘no’ by anyone in the NDP. And I said ‘no.’ I said, ‘Why not let the membership decide?’ Mr. Mulcair said of the ‘cordial’ conversation that occurred last month.” And speaking in the language of Third Way ‘modernizers,’ Mulcair stated in aninterview | 2 with the Toronto Star: “We have to renew. We’re one of the only social democratic parties to never have renewed itself. One of the things that we did in Quebec was that we reached out beyond our traditional base. We identified ourselves as progressives but we didn’t stick with some of the 1950s boilerplate.” Mulcair had the backing of 43 MPs, including the vast majority of Quebec MPs, as well as Premier Darrell Dexter of Nova Scotia and former British Columbia premier Mike Harcourt. Both Chisholm and Saganash endorsed Mulcair. With Mulcair’s much higher recognition and polling numbers in Quebec, there was a strong belief among many party members that Mulcair was the only leader who could hold onto their Quebec seats. Another ‘modernizer’ was Nathan Cullen, whose central campaign plank was to pursue tactical cooperation with the Liberals in order to beat Harper. Under this proposal, members of the riding associations of “progressive federalist parties” – NDP, Liberal and Green – could vote to have a joint candidate in that riding, which would be chosen in a “progressive primary.” Although this proposal was opposed by the other leadership candidates, the charismatic Cullen was able to make his proposal a central topic of discussion in all- candidates’ debates. Cullen had a particularly strong following among young voters and was very successful in organizing on the Internet, with the online advocacy groupsAvaaz and Leadnow.ca supporting his campaign. Peggy Nash, a former negotiator with the Canadian Autoworkers (CAW) prior to her entry into politics and who later had a stint as party president, pursued more traditional social democratic themes in her campaign. Nash proudly spoke of her trade union background and the crucial role of the labour movement in terms of creating a more egalitarian society, and stressed the need to engage with social movements and to reach out to the disaffected 40 per cent of the population that no longer votes. Nash made proportional representation a key issue in her campaign. She had also had a strong following among the young, with the majority of her campaign workers being under 30. Nash was supported by former federal party leader Audrey McLaughlin, Left political economists Mel Watkins and Jim Stanford, and many prominent trade union leaders such as Ontario Federation of Labour president Sid Ryan, CAW president Ken Lewenza, and CUPE president Paul Moist. With regard to the other candidates: Paul Dewar, who was backed by respected MP and NDP Ethics Critics Charlie Angus, saw his chances evaporate when his inability to speak French became increasingly well known; Martin Singh ran on an explicitly pro-business platform and served as a stalking horse for Mulcair; and Niki Ashton (at age 29 the youngest candidate), focused on traditional social democratic themes with a particular emphasis on generational inequality. Anybody But Mulcair? In the last few weeks of the campaign, ‘anybody but Mulcair’ sentiment increasingly solidified behind Topp, who repeatedly stated that “we don’t have to become Liberals to win” and warned that Mulcair would remodel the party on ‘New Labour’ lines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsocialist-Issue54
    VIRTUAL SEXUALITY BOLIVIAN ELECTIONS 54 NOV-JAN 2005/2006 ISSUE NO. 54 SPECIAL ISSUE ON CANADA & EMPIRE $4.95 HURRICANE KATRINA 7272006 86358 www.newsociallist.org EDITORIAL Canada and Empire Since the US government reacted to the attacks of No serious analysis of Canadian history or contemporary September 11th, 2001 by accelerating its push for global state polices towards Aboriginal communities can deny the dominance, there has been more talk about empire and impe- colonial nature of Canada or lend credence to a political strat- rialism than at any time since the 1970s. egy based on asserting the sovereignty of the same state that With Canadian troops and police in Afghanistan and denies Aboriginal Peoples and Quebec the right to self-deter- Haiti, the big boost in spending on the military in the last mination up to and including independence if they so federal budget and active government support for the “struc- choose. tural adjustment” policies of the International Monetary In our view, the notion that Canada is some kind of Fund and the World Bank that have inflicted so much harm dependent nation can’t be squared with the reality of the on people in the “Third World,” serious questions about Canadian state’s current role in Haiti or its pursuit of policies Canada’s relationship to imperialism are harder and harder to that destroy the livelihoods of millions of people in the ignore. Global South while giving free reign to multinational corpo- But because most anti-imperialist protest and analysis in rations – including Canadian companies - to plunder their Canada focuses on the US, such important questions often resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..214 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.25)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, December 5, 2011 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 3947 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, December 5, 2011 The House met at 11 a.m. increase Canadian trade with our major partners in a new sustainable energy economy. The Acting Speaker (Mr. Barry Devolin): Since today is the Prayers final allotted day for the supply period ending December 10, 2011, the House will go through the usual procedures to consider and dispose of the supply bill. PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS In view of recent practices, do hon. members agree that the bill be distributed now? CANADA LABOUR CODE (Bill C-307. On the Order: Private Members' Business:) Some hon. members: Agreed. October 3, 2011—Second reading of Bill C-307, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (pregnant or nursing employees)—The member for Rosemont—La Ms. Megan Leslie: Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to share my time Petite-Patrie. with the member for Terrebonne—Blainville. Ï (1105) I am very honoured to stand here today and debate this NDP [Translation] motion on climate change and what is happening in Durban. I am SUSPENSION OF SITTING proud to be here with my colleagues in the House who are clear supporters of internationally binding agreements when it comes to The Speaker: The hon. member for Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie reducing our greenhouse gas emissions and actually taking action on is not present to move the order as announced in today's notice climate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • "New World Order": Imperialist Barbarism
    SPARTACIST Bush, Mulroney' Gloat Over Desert Massacre "New World Order": Imperialist Barbarism Rebours/AP Charred remains of imperialist slaughter of Iraqi soldiers withdrawing from Kuwait. As planes repeatedly bombed "killing box" for over 12 hours, pilots boasted It was "like shooting fish in a barrel." U.S. imperialism's easy win in its one-sided, bloody war of armbands. Bush gloats that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein devastation against Iraq is a deadly danger to working people "walks amidst ruins," while a pumped-up officer in the field and the oppressed everywhere. trumpets Washington's messagc to "thc rest of the world": The flag-wavers came out in force, with military parades and "If the U.S. is going to deploy forces, watch out." yellow ribbons everywhere. The U.S. Congress staged a spec­ Washington's junior partners in Ottawa played their part tacle for the conquering commander in chief that rcsembled in raining death upon the people of Iraq. Now Joe Clark has something between a football pep rally and a Nazi beer haJJ been sent to tour the Near East, hoping to share the spotlight meeting. Democrats and Republicans alike repeatcdly rose to for helping with the slaughter, and sniffing around for a few ehant "Bush! Bush! Bush!" and wore American flags like (continued on page 12) 2 SPARTACIST/Canada Partisan Defense Committee Fund Appeal Defend Arrested British Spartacist! At a February 2 demonstration against the Gulf War in London Alastair Green, a comrade of the Spartacist League!Britain, was arrcsted, dragged off the march, hit in the face with a police helmet and then charged with "obstructing a police officer" and "threatening behaviour." The police action against our comrade was carried out expressly on the basis of the SL/B's political positions on the war-for the' defeat of U.S.!British imperialism and defense of Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Estrategias Electorales De La Izquierda Canadiense En Un
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales⎥ Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Nueva Época, Año LXII, núm. 231 ⎥ septiembre-diciembre de 2017 ⎥ pp. 77-106⎥ ISSN-2448-492X Estrategias electorales de la izquierda canadiense en un sistema que favorece al bipartidismo Electoral Strategies of the Canadian Left in A Predominantly Two-Party System Oliver Santín Peña∗ Recibido: 11 de mayo de 2016 Aceptado: 2 de mayo de 2017 RESUMEN ABSTRACT Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el This paper aims to analyze the origin, develop- origen, desarrollo y estrategias de la izquier- ment and strategies of the Canadian party-based da partidista canadiense y su evolución como left and its evolution as a political group to com- grupo político para contender en elecciones fe- pete in federal elections. From its beginnings in derales. A partir de su nacimiento en la década the 1930s, the left as an organized movement de 1930, la izquierda organizada en agrupa- of parties has had to adapt to a political system ciones partidistas se ha adaptado a un sistema of British origin favoring a two-party system of político de origen británico que favorece el bi- liberals and conservatives. This condition re- partidismo entre liberales y conservadores. Esta inforces our hypothesis and findings that the condición refuerza nuestra hipótesis y hallazgos Canadian political system favors bipartisanship de que el sistema político canadiense favorece el (liberal/conservative) excluding other parties to bipartidismo (liberal/-conservador), impidien- gain access to power, which constitutes a par- do que otros partidos puedan contender por el adox of democracy. Consequently, finding and acceso al poder, lo que constituye una paradoja extending new bases of support and redesigning de la democracia.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Rental Happen Challenge Brian Topp
    Brian Topp Partner Kool, Topp & Guy Public Affairs Brian Topp is one of Canada’s most successful New Democrat strategists. “A key figure in the NDP’s rise over the past decade,” according to Maclean’s magazine. Brian is a Partner in this firm. He previously was Executive Director and CEO of ACTRA Toronto, a professional union in the film and television industry. Before that he was Senior Vice President at Credit Union Central of Canada (CUCC), the national office of Canada’s credit union system. He also served as Vice President (Government Relations) for CUCC, representing the credit union system during a successful round of discussions over reform of banking legislation. Under the leadership of Premier Roy Romanow, he served as deputy chief of staff in the Premier’s office of the Government of Saskatchewan. Brian served as national campaign director for the New Democratic Party of Canada in two federal elections under the leadership of NDP Leader Jack Layton. He played a senior national campaign role in four other federal campaigns as well as in five provincial ones. He has served in numerous other roles in his party, including a stint as its national president. He was a candidate to succeed Jack Layton as Leader of the New Democratic Party, coming second in that race with 43% of the vote on the final ballot. He is chair of the board of Creative Arts Savings and Credit Union; a director at ROI Fund, part of a $1.4 billion venture capital fund family; and a director at Pinewood Toronto, a major film and television studio.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunnyside Beach Juried Art Show May 31 - June 2, 2013
    sunnyside beach juried art show may 31 - june 2, 2013 sunnyside beach juried art show may 31 - june 2, 2013 Friday, May 31, 4 pm - 8 pm Saturday, June 1, 11 am - 8 pm Sunday, June 2, 11 am - 6 pm at Sunnyside Pavilion 1755 Lake Shore Blvd. West Toronto, Ontario M6S 5A3 Free admission Rain or shine www.artinitiatives.ca Welcome to a unique opportunity to meet artists and support their practice inside one of Toronto’s architectural gems. The Sunnyside Beach Juried Art Show is a three-day fi ne art event that takes place in the historic Sunnyside Pavilion on Toronto’s west-end waterfront. The sixth edition of the show features painting, drawing, photography, and sculpture, alongside art installations, live music performances and art workshops by acclaimed emerging and established artists. artists Arezoo Amili after the bath, 2008, 20’ x 28”, classic/realism art amypaintings4sale.weebly.com Emily Marie Carrick high park, 2012, 36” x 36”, acrylics paper pastes & polymer www.mixedmediums.com Mellissa Chiodo united in colour, 2012, 24’ x 29”, acrylic www.luhvart.com sunnyside beach juried art show Roger Cullman great blue heron takes fl ight, 2009, 20” x 30”, giclée canvas photographic print with UV-matte laminate www.rogercullman.com Karin Lynn Cumming native, 2012, 9” x 12”, ink on paper karinlynncumming.weebly.com Aristotle Domingo newfoundland shores, 2011, 16” x 24”, photograph aristotledomingo.com artists Josée Duranleau supreme generosity, 2013, 12” x 16”, mixed media on wood www.joseeduranleau.com Gina Duque microvilli, 2011, 60” x 48”,
    [Show full text]
  • Allan Blakeney: Deftly Navigating Thunderstorms
    ALLAN BLAKENEY: DEFTLY NAVIGATING THUNDERSTORMS Brian Topp Saskatchewan Premier Allan Blakeney was one of Canada’s greatest premiers, and there is much for us to learn from his approach to issues ranging from managing a resource dependent economy and the Charter, to how to run a fiscally responsible, economically literate and socially progressive social democratic government. Premier ministre de la Saskatchewan, Allan Blakeney a été l’un des meilleurs chefs provinciaux du pays et aurait beaucoup à nous apprendre aujourd’hui sur la gestion d’une économie tributaire des ressources naturelles, sur la Charte des droits et libertés tout comme le fonctionnement d’un gouvernement social-démocrate qui est à la fois financièrement responsable, économiquement compétent et socialement progressiste. first met Allan Blakeney, one of Canada’s greatest pre- CEOs; constitutional issues; national unity; trade issues. It is miers, during a high-risk aeronautics experiment. not the easy problems that make it onto a premier’s desk. It I Specifically, in the 1990s the Government of is the toughest problems — and it was the very toughest Saskatchewan wanted to see what would happen when a ones that Romanow discussed with Blakeney. couple of Cessna airplanes purchased in the 1960s contin- ued to be flown as the government’s “executive air” fleet to lakeney approached each issue like a fascinating little ferry ministers and officials around the sprawling province. B chess puzzle. What if we did this? What if we did that? Would the planes stay in the air? Or would one of them Did you think of this? What would it mean if that were so? finally break up after decades of loyal service, tumbling with All with a cheerful, wry humour and the slightest undertone some of the province’s most senior people into a wheat field of skepticism about the high principles invoked by princi- 10,000 feet below? The planes spent more time being serv- pals making their cases, usually at high decibels, before the iced than they did flying — they were the last planes of their premier.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..44 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 9.00)
    House of Commons CANADA Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology INDU Ï NUMBER 024 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Chair Mr. James Rajotte Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1 Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Ï (1535) I've been tracking the development of RADARSAT-2 for a [English] number of years and was invited to appear before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International The Chair (Mr. James Rajotte (Edmonton—Leduc, CPC)): Trade in 2005 to speak about the Remote Sensing Space Systems We'll call this meeting to order. This is the 24th meeting of the Act, which was at that time called Bill C-25. At that time I was Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. representing my previous employer, the Polaris Institute, and we Members, we have 13 votes at 5:30, so we'll have to end this raised concerns about the potential defence applications of meeting at 5:15. RADARSAT-2 and the need for its sensitive technology to be firmly controlled by the Canadian government. I believe our last guest is here. We have with us today four guests. The orders of the day today are, pursuant to Standing Order 108 In recent years my work has become more involved in promoting (2), for the study of the proposed sale of part of MacDonald, Canadian leadership and ensuring that the benefits of space and its Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years in the Making
    ANATOMY OF THE ORANGE CRUSH: TEN YEARS IN THE MAKING Brad Lavigne It has been called an overnight success a decade in the making. The historical political realignment of federal politics by Jack Layton and the New Democratic Party was in fact an ambitious and methodical strategy to modernize Canada’s social democratic party into a viable contender for government. Brad Lavigne, the 2011 campaign manager, NDP senior strategist and longtime Jack Layton adviser, provides an insider’s account of the anatomy of the Orange Crush. Un succès instantané, certes, mais précédé d’une décennie de préparation. C’est ainsi qu’on a qualifié l’exploit de Jack Layton et du NPD, qui ont opéré un réalignement historique de la vie politique canadienne grâce à leur stratégie de modernisation ambitieuse et méthodique en vue de faire du parti social-démocrate un aspirant crédible à la direction du pays. Directeur de la campagne 2011, stratège en chef du NPD et longtemps conseiller de Jack Layton, Brad Lavigne décortique les tenants et aboutissants de la « vague orange ». t only took a few minutes. I stepped out of the makeshift It was an outcome that very few outside Jack Layton’s cir- war room in our election-night operations at the cle believed was possible and one that even fewer predicted. I Intercontinental Hotel in downtown Toronto to make a few short calls to congratulate newly elected New Democratic o how did it happen? Was it an accident? Was Jack Party (NDP) Members of Parliament from Atlantic Canada. S Layton — and the 2011 NDP campaign — simply the By the time I returned from the adjoining room, the benefactor of lacklustre performances from the Liberals and team had taped a bunch of flip-chart paper to the walls with the Bloc Québécois? Or was it something more? the names of dozens and dozens of Quebec ridings scribbled To understand how the “Orange Crush” on May 2, on them.
    [Show full text]
  • New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents Faculty Scholarship 4-2021 Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen - New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report Gerry Scott Judy Bradley Modeste McKenzie Craig M. Scott Brian Topp Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/reports Part of the Election Law Commons Repository Citation Scott, Gerry; Bradley, Judy; McKenzie, Modeste; Scott, Craig M.; and Topp, Brian, "Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen - New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report" (New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan, 2021). Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents. Paper 217. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/reports/217 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Saskatchewan 2024: Making Change Happen New Democratic Party of Saskatchewan Election Review Panel Report April 2021 This page has been intentionally left blank. Index Introduction and Executive Summary ........................................................................page 3 Part 1: Our Results 1. Eligible voter turnout in Saskatchewan has declined .............................................page 8 2. The NDP is struggling to rebuild its caucus ...........................................................page 9 3. A regional breakdown tells a more complex story ...............................................page 10 4. Conservatives enjoy a massive fundraising advantage.........................................page 11 5. Party membership has steadily declined since its peak in 1991 ...........................page 12 Part 2: Why These Results? Political issues: 1. The so-called “Saskatchewan Party” proved to be a loyal pupil of the NDP .......page 14 2.
    [Show full text]