DOCSLIB.ORG

Diplomacy and Human Migration: a History of U.S. Relations with Cuba During the Late Cold War DISSERTATION Presented in Partial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Diplomacy and Human Migration: A History of U.S. Relations with Cuba during the Late Cold War DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hideaki Kami Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Professor Robert J. McMahon, Adviser Professor Peter L. Hahn, Co-adviser Professor Stephanie J. Smith Copyright by Hideaki Kami 2015 Abstract This dissertation analyzes U.S.-Cuban relations by focusing on the interaction of diplomacy and human migration during the late Cold War years. It explores how the U.S. government reformulated its Cuban policy in light of Fidel Castro’s institutionalization of power while, at the same time, trying to build a new relationship with the Cuban- American community as the latter forged a new, politically mobilized constituency within U.S. society. Based on historical sources from the United States, Cuba, and other countries, I argue that the triangular relations among Washington, Havana, and Miami formidably reinforced the status quo. As hundreds of thousands of Cuban-Americans participated in U.S. politics in the hope of toppling the Castro regime, the U.S. government could no longer dismiss their concerns as completely alien to the national interest. But while committing to “freedom” in Cuba in their public statements, U.S. policy-makers in fact placed a higher priority on stability in the Caribbean Sea; they collaborated with the Cuban government to prevent migration crises such as the 1980 Mariel boatlift, one of the largest and most traumatic in modern U.S. history. By exploring the interactions of diplomacy and human migration, this dissertation not only analyzes the contradictory nature of U.S. policy toward Cuba but also illuminates how the making of U.S. foreign policy has changed due to the inflow of people from other parts of the world. ii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my father, Yuji Kami, who always supported my endeavor. iii Acknowledgement My academic journey toward completing a Ph.D. dissertation has received much support and encouragement from countless persons and institutions. When I entered the University of Tokyo, the Funou Foundation assisted my undergraduate study and several overseas trips. When I continued at the University of Tokyo for its graduate program, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science supported me. For the first two years at The Ohio State University, the Japan-United States Educational Commission granted me a Fulbright Fellowship. Without their support, my quest for a Ph.D. degree would have been an unfulfilled dream. Generous grants from the Ohio State University’s Department of History, Mershon Center, Center for Latin American Studies, and College of Arts and Sciences played crucial roles in advancing my research. Outside support from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, the Gerald Ford Presidential Foundation, and the George H. W. Bush School of Government and Public Service, also provided important support as well. A pre-doctoral research fellowship from the University of Miami’s Cuban Heritage Collection gave me the opportunity to conduct intensive research in Miami for three months. I was fortunate to receive a Presidential Fellowship from the Graduate School of the Ohio State University, which enabled me to devote the final year of my Ph.D. program to writing this dissertation. iv In Tokyo, I was lucky to discover a topic that inspired my intellectual curiosity and passion. My undergraduate adviser, Hitoshi Takahashi, sparked my interest in migration and Cuban relations with the United States. Testuya Amino, Jun Ishibashi, Hideo Kimura, Ayako Saito, Fumihiko Takemura, and Keiichi Tsunekawa also supported my study of Latin America and understood my interest in North America. I am forever thankful to Jun Furuya. Not only did he accept me as his advisee, but he also guided my study, nurtured my intellectual development, and spent countless hours and days consulting with this young scholar. His classes were intellectually stimulating and instrumental to my growth, as were those of Yasuo Endo, Kenryu Hashikawa, Takeshi Igarashi, Fumiaki Kubo, Fumiko Nishizaki, Masako Notoji, Takuya Sasaki, and Yujin Yaguchi, who had superb knowledge of U.S. politics, culture, and history. Ryan Irwin, Itsuki Kurashina, Sidney Pash, Sayuri Shimizu, and Paul Sracic gave me very helpful advice during my transition to Ohio State. My choice of Ohio State as the site for my graduate study proved fortuitous. Peter Hahn, Robert McMahon, Mitch Lerner, and Jennifer Siegel have created an outstanding diplomatic history program. Lilia Fernández, Steven Conn, Donna Guy, Stephanie Smith, and David Stebenne introduced me to new themes in Latin American and U.S. history. Philip Brown, Alice Conklin, Peter Hahn, and Stephanie Smith created an intellectual environment in their writing seminars. I was delighted that Stephanie Smith agreed to join my dissertation committee and believe her perspectives have added much to my research. Jim Bach, Ashley Bowerman, Chris Burton, Katherine Eckstrand, Jane Hathaway, Clay Howard, Robin Judd, Steve McCann, Rich Ugland, and Kristina Ward v kept me out of administrative trouble. David Lincove always helped me find books, journals, and databases at Ohio State University Libraries. I thank Peter Hahn for his exacting standards, always pushing me to be a better scholar, and inspiring me with his devotion to the field of diplomatic history. I am most indebted to Robert McMahon, who encouraged me to study at Ohio State, served as my adviser, and provided heartfelt backing during the various difficult points in graduate school. I was also lucky to spend my time in Columbus with an exceptional group of graduate students. Matthew Ambrose, Dani Anthony, Alexandra Castillo, Nicholas Crane, Reyna Esquivel-King, Delia Fernández, Megan Hasting, Steven Higley, Patrick Potyondy, Ryan Schultz, Spencer Tyce, Leticia Wiggins, and many other participants in formal and informal writing seminars read my chapters, gave me suggestions, and helped me improve my writing skills. Patrick provided breaks from my intellectual efforts by inviting me to pick-up soccer games on Ohio State’s gorgeous field. Will Chou, my friend, fellow historian, and language-exchange partner, contributed to this project in countless ways. He always stepped forward to offer valuable assistance, discover methods of collaboration, and make my life in the United States much easier. A great number of academics, archivists, and staff members outside Ohio State helped me produce this study. María Cristina García, Tanya Harmer, Yuko Ito, Yasuhiro Koike, William LeoGrande, Alan McPherson, Louis A. Pérez, Kanako Yamaoka, and two anonymous readers for the Journal of Cold War Studies, read part of this research in one form or another, giving me inspirational comments, thoughtful criticisms, and wonderful suggestions. I thank Isami Romero Hosino for inviting me to join his panels to vi present papers on various occasions. Yuki Oda, my senpai, always used his experience to show the path forward for me. Takahito Moriyama let me stay at his place during my research in Tallahassee, Florida. I also acknowledge my sincere gratitude to David Engstrom, who generously provided me with his interview transcripts, as well as Myles Frechette and Robert Gelbard, who shared with me accounts of their service for the United States. Numerous archivists and staff members extended timely and invaluable help to me. In Miami, I was in the good hands of María R. Estorino, Gladys Gómez-Rossie, Annie Sansone-Martínez, and Rosa Monzón-Alvarez of the University of Miami’s Cuban Heritage Collection, as well as Christina Favretto, Beatrice Skokan, Cory Czajkowski, and Yvette Yurubi of the University of Miami’s Special Collections. Koichi Tasa made my stay in Miami more accommodating. I learned greatly about the history of Miami Cubans from my meetings with Alfredo Durán, Francisco Hernández, and Marifeli Pérez- Stable. Matthew Angles, archivist at the Cuban American National Foundation, not only opened the door to the archive, but also assisted me in sifting through unprocessed materials. My research in Havana benefited tremendously from conversations with Carlos Alzugaray, Jesús Arboleya, García Entenza. Néstor García Iturbe, Lázaro Mora, José Luis Padrón, Ramón Sánchez-Parodi, José Viera, among others. Raynier Pellón Azopardo at the Centro de Investigaciones de Política Internacional went out of his way to process my academic visas. I enjoyed working with Eduardo Válido and Renier González Hernández at the Archivo Central del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. My vii friendship and collaboration with Elier Ramírez Cañedo was a great pleasure, one which I hope to continue in the future. Margarita Fonseca expanded my contacts in Havana with her introductions. I will never forget my gratitude to Gloria León, who helped navigate my study from the very beginning, and Piero Gleijeses, who put me in touch with her. The archivists and staffs of the Archivo General de México, the Archivo Histórico Genaro Estrada, the Library and Archive of Canada, and the National Archives of the United Kingdom were all professional, friendly, and quick to help. Of special mention are Brittany Paris at the Jimmy Carter Library, Shelly Williams at the Ronald Reagan Library, and Zachary Roberts at the George H. W. Bush Library. They patiently processed my mandatory review requests for thousands of U.S. records. Numerous others, especially those in Florida-based archives, contributed to this study by offering me their research assistance. My family was my greatest source of support throughout this endeavor. I deeply appreciate the understanding of my mother, Keiko, and my brother, Tomoaki, for my pursuit of an academic career. It is regrettable that my late father, Yuji Kami, cannot see this work, which is dedicated to him with all respect for what he had done for me. Finally, Chen Zhang made my otherwise lonely life richer and more enjoyable.
Recommended publications
  • Cuba and the World.Book

    Cuba and the World.Book

    CUBA FUTURES: CUBA AND THE WORLD Edited by M. Font Bildner Center for Western Hemisphere Studies Presented at the international symposium “Cuba Futures: Past and Present,” organized by the The Cuba Project Bildner Center for Western Hemisphere Studies The Graduate Center/CUNY, March 31–April 2, 2011 CUBA FUTURES: CUBA AND THE WORLD Bildner Center for Western Hemisphere Studies www.cubasymposium.org www.bildner.org Table of Contents Preface v Cuba: Definiendo estrategias de política exterior en un mundo cambiante (2001- 2011) Carlos Alzugaray Treto 1 Opening the Door to Cuba by Reinventing Guantánamo: Creating a Cuba-US Bio- fuel Production Capability in Guantánamo J.R. Paron and Maria Aristigueta 47 Habana-Miami: puentes sobre aguas turbulentas Alfredo Prieto 93 From Dreaming in Havana to Gambling in Las Vegas: The Evolution of Cuban Diasporic Culture Eliana Rivero 123 Remembering the Cuban Revolution: North Americans in Cuba in the 1960s David Strug 161 Cuba's Export of Revolution: Guerilla Uprisings and Their Detractors Jonathan C. Brown 177 Preface The dynamics of contemporary Cuba—the politics, culture, economy, and the people—were the focus of the three-day international symposium, Cuba Futures: Past and Present (organized by the Bildner Center at The Graduate Center, CUNY). As one of the largest and most dynamic conferences on Cuba to date, the Cuba Futures symposium drew the attention of specialists from all parts of the world. Nearly 600 individuals attended the 57 panels and plenary sessions over the course of three days. Over 240 panelists from the US, Cuba, Britain, Spain, Germany, France, Canada, and other countries combined perspectives from various fields including social sciences, economics, arts and humanities.
  • UNSOUND EFFECTS by Christy Fredrickson

    UNSOUND EFFECTS by Christy Fredrickson

    UNSOUND EFFECTS By Christy Fredrickson Copyright © MMXIV by Christy Fredrickson, All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-61588-323-3 CAUTION: Professionals and amateurs are hereby warned that this Work is subject to a royalty. This Work is fully protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and all countries with which the United States has reciprocal copyright relations, whether through bilateral or multilateral treaties or otherwise, and including, but not limited to, all countries covered by the Pan-American Copyright Convention, the Universal Copyright Convention and the Berne Convention. RIGHTS RESERVED: All rights to this Work are strictly reserved, including professional and amateur stage performance rights. Also reserved are: motion picture, recitation, lecturing, public reading, radio broadcasting, television, video or sound recording, all forms of mechanical or electronic reproduction, such as CD-ROM, CD-I, DVD, information and storage retrieval systems and photocopying, and the rights of translation into non-English languages. PERFORMANCE RIGHTS AND ROYALTY PAYMENTS: All amateur and stock performance rights to this Work are controlled exclusively by Heuer Publishing LLC. No amateur or stock production groups or individuals may perform this play without securing license and royalty arrangements in advance from Heuer Publishing LLC. Questions concerning other rights should be addressed to Heuer Publishing LLC. Royalty fees are subject to change without notice. Professional and stock fees will be set upon application in accordance with your producing circumstances. Any licensing requests and inquiries relating to amateur and stock (professional) performance rights should be addressed to Heuer Publishing LLC. Royalty of the required amount must be paid, whether the play is presented for charity or profit and whether or not admission is charged.
  • Historic Girls; Stories of Girls Who Have Influenced the History of Their Times

    Historic Girls; Stories of Girls Who Have Influenced the History of Their Times

    Title: Historic Girls; Stories of Girls Who Have Influenced the History of Their Times Author: Elbridge Streeter Brooks Language: English Subject: Fiction, Literature, Children's literature Publisher: World Public Library Association Copyright © 2008, All Rights Reserved Worldwide by World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net World Public Library The World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net is an effort to preserve and disseminate classic works of literature, serials, bibliographies, dictionaries, encyclopedias, and other reference works in a number of languages and countries around the world. Our mission is to serve the public, aid students and educators by providing public access to the world's most complete collection of electronic books on-line as well as offer a variety of services and resources that support and strengthen the instructional programs of education, elementary through post baccalaureate studies. This file was produced as part of the "eBook Campaign" to promote literacy, accessibility, and enhanced reading. Authors, publishers, libraries and technologists unite to expand reading with eBooks. Support online literacy by becoming a member of the World Public Library, http://www.WorldLibrary.net/Join.htm. Copyright © 2008, All Rights Reserved Worldwide by World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net www.worldlibrary.net *This eBook has certain copyright implications you should read.* This book is copyrighted by the World Public Library. With permission copies may be distributed so long as such copies (1) are for your or others personal use only, and (2) are not distributed or used commercially. Prohibited distribution includes any service that offers this file for download or commercial distribution in any form, (See complete disclaimer http://WorldLibrary.net/Copyrights.html).
  • Bay of Pigs Role in Foreign Policy

    Bay of Pigs Role in Foreign Policy

    Bay Of Pigs Role In Foreign Policy decontaminatedEmmanuel power-dive insistently. her hydrosulphide Double-chinned diametrally, Harrison unifiedbang-up her and bandanna edited. Unrazored so staring Seththat Pietro outvying, outstood his Cominformist very desirably. absquatulates Head refer the Revolutionary National Police. Consult thecontent narrative at american foreign threat. There were routed on foreign intervention against his role of bay pigs in foreign policy universal respect. The bay of pigs fiasco during one policy, economic community mental health care to talk about how many grand things. You will shortly receive a receipt for your rent via email. Fascinated by the meeting of his advisors that fraternal relations committee of bay of pigs role in foreign policy discussions with cuba and number of the cuban sponsors to. The forces of responsible for email address, has stated from one pentagon failed bay of pigs role in foreign policy and conduct sensitive and tanks to strengthen and testing them working for calling and international problems that? President kennedy a short term, bay of pigs role in foreign policy and peace mission is no means of pigs had learned that? This site uses cookies to cater you hire better browsing experience. Tell that policy actions that personally elevated was quite good case when he has collided in foreign power. Khrushchev was hell bent to affect policy derived from the bay of bay of pigs role in foreign policy toward panama. American author on it was determined to aggravate the foreign policy? Cuban Bay of Pigs operation. Castro had let every nation know how foreign policy concerns about people, bay to say you have taken an attempt to.
  • The 1970S: Pluralization, Radicalization, and Homeland

    The 1970S: Pluralization, Radicalization, and Homeland

    ch4.qxd 10/11/1999 10:10 AM Page 84 CHAPTER 4 The 1970s: Pluralization, Radicalization, and Homeland As hopes of returning to Cuba faded, Cuban exiles became more con- cerned with life in the United States. Exile-related struggles were put on the back burner as more immediate immigrant issues emerged, such as the search for better jobs, education, and housing. Class divisions sharpened, and advocacy groups seeking improved social services emerged, including, for example, the Cuban National Planning Council, a group of Miami social workers and businesspeople formed in the early 1970s. As an orga- nization that provided services to needy exiles, this group de‹ed the pre- vailing notion that all exiles had made it in the United States. Life in the United States created new needs and interests that could only be resolved, at least in part, by entering the domestic political arena. Although there had always been ideological diversity within the Cuban émigré community, it was not until the 1970s that the political spec- trum ‹nally began to re›ect this outwardly.1 Two sharply divided camps emerged: exile oriented (focused on overthrowing the Cuban revolution- ary government) and immigrant oriented (focused on improving life in the United States). Those groups that were not preoccupied with the Cuban revolution met with hostility from those that were. Exile leaders felt threat- ened by organized activities that could be interpreted as an abandonment of the exile cause. For example, in 1974 a group of Cuban exile researchers conducted an extensive needs assessment of Cubans in the United States and concluded that particular sectors, such as the elderly and newly arrived immigrants, were in need of special intervention.2 When their ‹ndings were publicized, they were accused of betraying the community because of their concern with immigrant problems rather than the over- throw of the revolution.
  • The Bay of Pigs Invasion As the Us's

    The Bay of Pigs Invasion As the Us's

    THE BAY OF PIGS INVASION AS THE US’S ‘PERFECT FAILURE’ FE LORRAINE REYES MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY Sixty years ago today, April 17, 1961, a CIA-operated group of Cuban exiles sought to overthrow the communist regime of Fidel Castro in what is known as the Bay of Pigs invasion. The planning for this overthrow culminated in 1960 when President Dwight Eisenhower ordered for the classified training of 1400 anti-Castro dissidents tasked with overthrowing the Prime Minister the following year. The Cold War had sparked tensions between Cuba and the United States. Cuba, which was strengthening its relations with communist Soviet Union, became a national security threat. The United States feared both the ideological spread of communism and a severed tie with Cuba, which the US remained tethered to for its own economic interest. Inevitably, the plans, fueled by fear and the preservation of national interests, were inherited by the Kennedy administration in January 1960. What John F. Kennedy did not anticipate was how the CIA’s invasion of Cuba’s southern beach would tarnish the world’s view of democracy for generations to come. Although the United States had intended to sever ties with Cuba (and, effectively, the Soviet base on its shores), the invasion, in turn, extended communist powers and protracted the downfall of the Soviet Union. The oversights in the CIA’s plans are why the Bay of Pigs became recognized as a catastrophic failure that emboldened the tension between the US and foreign powers and bookmarked the political relationship between the US, Cuba, and the Soviet Union.
  • 'The Cuban Question' and the Cold War in Latin America, 1959-1964

    'The Cuban Question' and the Cold War in Latin America, 1959-1964

    ‘The Cuban question’ and the Cold War in Latin America, 1959-1964 LSE Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101153/ Version: Published Version Article: Harmer, Tanya (2019) ‘The Cuban question’ and the Cold War in Latin America, 1959-1964. Journal of Cold War Studies, 21 (3). pp. 114-151. ISSN 1520-3972 https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws_a_00896 Reuse Items deposited in LSE Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the LSE Research Online record for the item. [email protected] https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/ The “Cuban Question” and the Cold War in Latin America, 1959–1964 ✣ Tanya Harmer In January 1962, Latin American foreign ministers and U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk arrived at the Uruguayan beach resort of Punta del Este to debate Cuba’s position in the Western Hemisphere. Unsurprisingly for a group of representatives from 21 states with varying political, socioeconomic, and geo- graphic contexts, they had divergent goals. Yet, with the exception of Cuba’s delegation, they all agreed on why they were there: Havana’s alignment with “extra-continental communist powers,” along with Fidel Castro’s announce- ment on 1 December 1961 that he was a lifelong Marxist-Leninist, had made Cuba’s government “incompatible with the principles and objectives of the inter-American system.” A Communist offensive in Latin America of “in- creased intensity” also meant “continental unity and the democratic institu- tions of the hemisphere” were “in danger.”1 After agreeing on these points, the assembled officials had to decide what to do about Cuba.
  • Diaspora and Deadlock, Miami and Havana: Coming to Terms with Dreams and Dogmas Francisco Valdes University of Miami School of Law, Fvaldes@Law.Miami.Edu

    Diaspora and Deadlock, Miami and Havana: Coming to Terms with Dreams and Dogmas Francisco Valdes University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]

    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2003 Diaspora and Deadlock, Miami and Havana: Coming to Terms With Dreams and Dogmas Francisco Valdes University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Francisco Valdes, Diaspora and Deadlock, Miami and Havana: Coming to Terms With Dreams and Dogmas, 55 Fla.L.Rev. 283 (2003). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIASPORA AND DEADLOCK, MIAMI AND HAVANA: COMING TO TERMS WITH DREAMS AND DOGMAS Francisco Valdes* I. INTRODUCTION ............................. 283 A. Division and Corruption:Dueling Elites, the Battle of the Straits ...................................... 287 B. Arrogation and Class Distinctions: The Politics of Tyranny and Money ................................. 297 C. Global Circus, Domestic Division: Cubans as Sport and Spectacle ...................................... 300 D. Time and Imagination: Toward the Denied .............. 305 E. Broken Promisesand Bottom Lines: Human Rights, Cuban Rights ...................................... 310 F. Reconciliationand Reconstruction: Five LatCrit Exhortations ...................................... 313 II. CONCLUSION .......................................... 317 I. INTRODUCTION The low-key arrival of Elian Gonzalez in Miami on Thanksgiving Day 1999,1 and the custody-immigration controversy that then ensued shortly afterward,2 transfixed not only Miami and Havana but also the entire * Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center for Hispanic & Caribbean Legal Studies, University of Miami.
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE COMMISSION on UNALIENABLE RIGHTS February 21, 2020 15:30

    U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE COMMISSION on UNALIENABLE RIGHTS February 21, 2020 15:30

    U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE COMMISSION ON UNALIENABLE RIGHTS February 2 1, 2020 15:30 Good afternoon. My name is Thor Halvorssen. I am the Chief Executive Officer of the Human Rights Foundation, a position I have held since the organization was founded in the year 2005. I am grateful to the Commission on Unalienable Rights and to Ambassador Mary Glendon for inviting me to share the Perspectives of HRF with you today. The Human Rights Foundation was created fifteen years ago by a group of individuals that included Vaclav Havel, Elie Wiesel, Harry Wu, Armando Valladares, Eduardo Mendoza, and James Q. Wilson. We initially came together to respond to the vacuum that existed in the human rights field when it came to monitoring, researching, and addressing what a group of us saw as the erosion of democracy, as defined by the Inter-American Democratic Charter, taking place in the Western Hemisphere, specifically in Venezuela, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Bolivia . What was occurring in these countries was the slow-motion suffocation of civil society, the destruction of freedom of expression and of the press, the systematic violation of th e separation of powers, and the gradual elimination of free and fair elections by governments ruled by democratically-elected leaders with authoritarian personalities all of whom expressed open admiration for then-octogenarian dictator Fidel Castro in Cuba, anD expressed their will to install dictatorial Cuba -like regimes in their own countries. One would think that the international organizations in the human rights field—the establishment ones with annual budgets in the $50 million to $100 million range— would have the experience, the expertise, and the resources to address these crises.
  • The War and Fashion

    The War and Fashion

    F a s h i o n , S o c i e t y , a n d t h e First World War i ii Fashion, Society, and the First World War International Perspectives E d i t e d b y M a u d e B a s s - K r u e g e r , H a y l e y E d w a r d s - D u j a r d i n , a n d S o p h i e K u r k d j i a n iii BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2021 Selection, editorial matter, Introduction © Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian, 2021 Individual chapters © their Authors, 2021 Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identifi ed as Editors of this work. For legal purposes the Acknowledgments on p. xiii constitute an extension of this copyright page. Cover design by Adriana Brioso Cover image: Two women wearing a Poiret military coat, c.1915. Postcard from authors’ personal collection. This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third- party websites referred to or in this book.
  • The Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Hungry Mind Lab 2016 Materials for imQ Project The Cuban Missile Crisis The Cuban Missile Crisis was a 13-day confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union over Soviet ballistic missiles deployed in Cuba that took place between October 16 and October 28 in 1962. Information about the Cuban Missile Crisis was broadcast on television worldwide, and it was the one event in history that brought the Cold War closest to escalating into a full-scale nuclear war. Following from the enmity between the United States and the Soviet Union since the end of World War II in 1945, the United States was concerned about the rise of Communism, and a Latin American country allying openly with the USSR, short for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was unacceptable. In addition, the United States had recently suffered a public embarrassment, because of the failed invasion at the Bay of Pigs in April 1961 under President John F. Kennedy. The invasion had been attempted by a group known as Brigade 2506 that consisted of 1400 paramilitaries, who had been trained and funded by the United States government's Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Launched from Guatemala on 17 April 1961, the Brigade 2506 had intended to land at the Bay of Pigs and to overthrow Cuba's increasingly communist government but it was defeated within three days by the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces, who were under the direct command of Cuba's Prime Minister Fidel Castro. After the events at the Bay of Pigs, the former American President Eisenhower told Kennedy that now the Soviets were "embolden to do something that they would otherwise not do." Indeed, the failed invasion created the impression with Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev and his advisers that Kennedy was indecisive and, as one Soviet adviser wrote about Kennedy: "too young, intellectual, not prepared well for decision making in crisis situations ..