POPULATION DEVELOPMENT of SLOVENIA from the BEGINNING of COUNTING to the PRESENT DAY Damir Josipovi~

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

POPULATION DEVELOPMENT of SLOVENIA from the BEGINNING of COUNTING to the PRESENT DAY Damir Josipovi~ POPULATION DEVELOPMENT OF SLOVENIA FROM THE BEGINNING OF COUNTING TO THE PRESENT DAY Damir Josipovi~ According to its numbers, the Slovene population belongs ethnically and nationally among the small- er populations of European countries. However, it is distinguished by its historic endurance and continuity in Slovenia and in neighbouring areas since the 6th century. The existence of the Slovene people as an ethnic group that survived in spite of strong assimilation pressures and which managed to preserve the Slovene language as the main distinguishing component of ethnicity largely throughout its rural hinterland provided the foundation for the formation of modern Slovenia. Throughout its history from its initial colonization in the 6th century, Slovene ethnic territory shrank constantly. In the first few cen- turies after colonization, the settling area of our Slovene ancestors encompassed the majority of the territory of today's Austria, more than a third of Hungary and Croatia, and eastern border areas of today's Italy. Relative to the size of today's Slovenia, this ethnic territory shrank most in the north and east, and least in the west. As an independent country, Slovenia is the millennium-long dream of the Slovene people come true, but a considerable area populated by speakers of autochthonous Slovene dialects still remains outside the state borders. Thus today, Slovenia has autochthonous minorities in all four neighbouring countries. In the time since the first estimates of the population on the territory of today's Slovenia in the mid- dle of the 18th century and the first censuses a good century later, the Slovene population has not increased as other European populations then comparable with the Slovene population have. In the 19th centu- Figure 1: Manual farm work has almost disappeared (photography Marjan Garbajs). 81 Damir Josipovi~ ofSlovenia Development Population 82 Table 1: Number and gender of the population of Slovenia and changes in the number after the population censuses in the period between 1857 and 2002. 1857 1869 1880 1890 1900 1910 1921 1931 1948 1953 1961 1971 1981 1991 2002 TOTAL 1.101.854 1.128.768 1.182.223 1.234.056 1.268.055 1.321.098 1.304.800 1.397.650 1.439.800 1.504.427 1.591.523 1.727.137 1.891.864 1.913.355 1.964.036 Men (m) 535.945 545.614 576.964 601.031 618.065 643.898 622.168 673.248 675.353 712.034 760.770 835.998 918.766 923643 958.576 Women (w) 565.909 583.154 605.259 633.025 649.990 677.200 682.632 724.402 764.447 792.393 830.753 891.139 973.098 989712 1.005.460 Absolute Difference 0 26.914 53.455 51.833 33.999 53.043 –16.298 92.850 42.150 64.627 87.096 135.614 164.727 21.491 50.681 Absolute Diff. (m) 0 9.669 31.350 24.067 17.034 25.833 –21.730 51.080 2.105 36.681 48.736 75.228 82.768 4.877 34.933 Absolute Diff. (w) 0 17.245 22.105 27.766 16.965 27.210 5.432 41.770 40.045 27.946 38.360 60.386 81.959 16.614 15.748 Index 100 102.4 107.3 112.0 115.1 119.9 118.4 126.8 130.7 136.5 144.4 156.7 171.7 173.6 178.2 Chain Index 100 102.4 104.7 104.4 102.8 104.2 98.8 107.1 103.0 104.5 105.8 108.5 109.5 101.1 102.6 Index (m) 100 101.8 107.7 112.1 115.3 120.1 116.1 125.6 126.0 132.9 141.9 156.0 171.4 172.3 178.9 from the beginning of Counting to the Present Day thePresent thebeginning to ofCounting from Chain Index (m) 100 101.8 105.7 104.2 102.8 104.2 96.6 108.2 100.3 105.4 106.8 109.9 109.9 100.5 103.8 Index (w) 100 103.0 107.0 111.9 114.9 119.7 120.6 128.0 135.1 140.0 146.8 157.5 172.0 174.9 177.7 Chain Index (w) 100 103.0 103.8 104.6 102.7 104.2 100.8 106.1 105.5 103.7 104.8 107.3 109.2 101.7 101.6 Source: [ifrer 1963; SURS; our own calculations; Census data refers to the current territory of Slovenia. Calculations for the current territory for censuses between 1857 and 1910 are summarized from @. [ifrer – Stanovni{tvo 3/1963). Slovenia: a Geographical Overview ry, the Slovene population ranked among the medium-sized populations of the European space and in numbers was roughly comparable with the neighbouring Croatian and Serbian populations, if we limit ourselves to just the populations in our immediate vicinity. However, the Serbian population in particular experienced a rapid expansion during the 20th century, and today the Serbian population is about five times larger than the Slovene population, while the Croatian population is twice its size. The reasons for the very low increase in the Slovene population are numerous, the most important being emigration of a large part of active population mostly to overseas countries and the simultaneous start of a decline in the birth rate. One of the basic factors of this development is certainly the lack of a Slovene nation-state. Thus in comparison with other ethnic populations, demographic transition did not bring comparable population surpluses. The same is true of all populations who have been without their own state for a long time. Among the classic nation-states in Europe today, only the Estonian population is smaller than the Slovene population. The reason for this lies in the political power of the country, which could acquire speakers through its official language policy at the expense of languages whose status was not officially recognized. A comparison of census data shows that the number of inhabitants on the current territory of Slovenia has not even doubled since the first census and that growth was not steady in the periods between cen- suses. The period between 1857 and 1910 was marked by a quite constant but weak growth in the number of the population. This growth would have been considerably higher had the population not started to emigrate intensively in the second half of the 19th century, mostly due to agrarian overpopulation and the general socio-economic crisis. The extent of emigration has been so large that along with the Irish and the Croats, Slovenes rank to the very top of European emigration. Between 1910 and 1921, the number of the population even regressed, which can be attributed to large war losses and the addi- tional emigration mostly from the western part of Slovenia (Primorska) that was granted to Italy as spoils of war after World War I. Between 1921 and 1948, the Slovene population did record growth, 2.000.000 1.800.000 1.600.000 1.400.000 1.200.000 1.000.000 800.000 600.000 400.000 200.000 0 1857 1869 1880 1890 1900 1910 1921 1931 1948 1953 1961 1971 1981 1991 2002 TOTAL Men Women Figure 2: Number and gender of the population of Slovenia according to censuses between 1857 and 2002 (Source: Ibid.). 83 Damir Josipovi~ ofSlovenia Development Population 84 Murska Sobota Gornja Radgona [ ~a Ledava vn Mura Radlje ob Dravi ica Dravograd Lenart Drava v Slovenskih goricah Lendava Ravne na Koro{kem Ru{e P e s n Slovenj Gradec i Ljutomer MARIBOR c a Kranjska Gora Me`a ^rna na Koro{kem Jesenice Ptuj Ormo` Bled Tr`i~ Slovenska Bistrica Bovec Mozirje Velenje Sav Radovljica in Slovenske Konjice avinja ja Dr Bohinjska Bistrica @alec Celje Roga{ka Slatina So~a Kamnik a [entjur @elezniki Kranj j n Tolmin i v [kofja Loka Trbovlje a Sora Dom`ale S La{ko Cerkno Sava Hrastnik Idrijca Zagorje ob Savi Sava from the beginning of Counting to the Present Day thePresent thebeginning to ofCounting from @iri Litija Idrija LJUBLJANA Sevnica Sotla Ljubljanica Mi na Nova Gorica Vrhnika Grosuplje r Kr{ko Bre`ice Logatec Trebnje Vipava Ajdov{~ina Population growth index 2002/1991 Krka 120 and more (722) Cerknica Novo mesto 110 to 119,9 (759) Postojna Pivka Ribnica 100 to 109,9 (1434) Se`ana 90 to 99,9 (1505) Reka Metlika 80 to 89,9 (828) A D R I A T I C Ko~evje less than 80 (750) S E A ^rnomelj Ilirska Bistrica Koper 01020304050 km Piran Izola Dragonja Kolpa Scale: 1 : 1,300,000 Author: Damir Josipovi~ © Geografski in{titut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU, 2004 Slovenia: a Geographical Overview p Figure 3: Change in the population by settlements in Slovenia between 1991 and 2002 (Source: our own calculations, SURS). but this was reduced because of the continuation of emigration and losses as a consequence of World War II. After World War II with the post-war baby boom, emigration continued into the 1950's, but after that period Slovenia became an immigration area as a result of rapid industrialization. Emigration to foreign countries dropped markedly while the influx of the population from other parts of the for- mer Yugoslavia increased. Because the natural increase still ensured a relative surplus, the number of the population increased considerably with positive migration balance, especially in the period between 1971 and 1981. The data for the census years 1991 and 2002 is not quite comparable with pre- vious data because of a different definition of the population, which is now the same in Slovenia as it is in the majority of European Union countries.
Recommended publications
  • The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy Sean Krummerich University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, and the European History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Krummerich, Sean, "Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nationalitätenrecht: The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy by Sean Krummerich A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor, Graydon A. Tunstall, Ph.D. Kees Botterbloem, Ph.D. Giovanna Benadusi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 6, 2012 Keywords – Austria, Hungary, Serb, Croat, Slovene Copyright © 2012, Sean Krummerich Dedication For all that they have done to inspire me to new heights, I dedicate this work to my wife Amanda, and my son, John Michael. Acknowledgments This study would not have been possible without the guidance and support of a number of people. My thanks go to Graydon Tunstall and Kees Boterbloem, for their assistance in locating sources, and for their helpful feedback which served to strengthen this paper immensely.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – Was Formed in 1918, One of I
    Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – was formed in 1918, one of its most important tasks was to forge a common collective identity. Intellectual elites in the young state with great optimism agreed that education would play a crucial role in this process. It should come as no surprise, then, that a relatively rich tradition of scholarly research into the representation of collective identities in Yugoslav education has originated, precisely to account for the failure of the Yugoslav project in the long term. Recently, a growing body of scholarly research has established textbooks as one of the more rewarding sources for studying collective identity in education, focusing on ‘what knowledge is included and rejected in ... textbooks, and how the transmission of this selected knowledge often attempts to shape a particular form of national memory, national identity and national consciousness’.1 For the Yugoslav case this emerging research field so far has primarily examined textbooks which were used in the period directly preceding, during and following the disintegration of Yugoslavia.2 However, as the present article hopes to illustrate, textbook analysis can also provide the historian with interesting new elements for the study of collective identities in Yugoslavia’s more distant past. With its focus on national identity in Serbian, Croatian and Slovenian textbooks before the First World War, and later also in interwar Yugoslavia, the work of Charles Jelavich still occupies a somewhat
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of the Regions – Slovenia Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000 – VIII, 80 Pp
    PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS 13 17 KS-29-00-779-EN-C PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: ECU 25,00 ISBN 92-828-9403-7 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION L-2985 Luxembourg ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA EUROPEAN COMMISSION ࢞ I eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-9404-5 © European Communities, 2000 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium II PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS eurostat Foreword The accession discussions already underway with all ten of the Phare countries of Central and Eastern Europe have further boosted the demand for statistical data concerning them. At the same time, a growing appreciation of regional issues has raised interest in regional differences in each of these countries. This volume of the “Portrait of the Regions” series responds to this need and follows on in a tradition which has seen four volumes devoted to the current Member States, a fifth to Hungary, a sixth volume dedicated to the Czech Republic and Poland, a seventh to the Slovak Republic and the most recent volume covering the Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Examining the 12 statistical regions of Slovenia, this ninth volume in the series has an almost identical structure to Volume 8, itself very similar to earlier publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the National Question in Slovenia Before 1914 W
    SOCIAL SCIENCES 331 Marxism and the National Question in Slovenia before 1914 w. A. OWINGS, Oldahoma City UDiverslty The Slovenes, a South Slav people, before 1914 were contained within the Austrian part of the Austro-Hungartan empire. They were one of the smaller nations, numbering about 1,200,000. Their lands were of stra­ tegic significance, lying directly across the communications routes from both Vienna and Budapest to Trieste. The combined factors of numerical weakness, strategic location, and Hapsburg determination to maintain the integrity of the Empire made it almost inconceivable that the Slovenes might ever become independent. They were a highly nationalistic people, however, and by the mJddle of the nineteenth century sought relief from Austro-German domJnation. Their aspirations were couched in the form of demands for cultural and political a.utonomy within the Empire. Among the advocates of autonomy were the social democrats. Theo­ retically Marxists should have had no interest in nationalism; reality dic­ tated that they, like any other powerseekers, develop a national program. Their program represents a particularly clear-cut example of the influ­ ence of local political environment on the evolution of policy of a :Marxist party. The purpose of this paper is to examine (1) the character18tic approach of Slovenes to the national question; (2) the emphasis of 80Clal democrats on parliamentary reform; (3) the synthesis of those elements which comprised the Slovenlan SD national program; and (4) the fate of that program when introduced into the cockpit of politics. The approach of Slovenes to the national question wu conditioned by the fact that they were an "unhistorical" people; that 18, unlike the Czechs and Croats, they had no history as a separate political entity which might afford a legal precedent for claims to political autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia and the Census: from the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-Based Census of 2011 Research Article
    Slovenia and the Census: From the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-based Census of 2011 Research Article Damir Josipovič Senior Scientific Associate, Institute for Ethnic Studies in Ljubljana [email protected] http://www.suedosteuropa.uni-graz.at/cse/en/josipovic Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2015, 2(2), 159-75 Contemporary Southeastern Europe is an online, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, scholarly, and policy-oriented research on issues relevant to societies in Southeastern Europe. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.contemporarysee.org Slovenia and the Census: From the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-based Census of 2011 Damir Josipovič The article critically examines censuses in the Republic of Slovenia. Owing to its Yugoslav past, the censuses after 1945 have been closely scrutinized, and the common Yugoslav census methodology had a strong influence on the 1991 and 2002 censuses. The 1991 enumeration was carried out within the Yugoslav state; however the data processing and result publishing was done under the newly independent Slovenian state. The 2002 census was the last census to be carried out using classic door-to-door enumeration, since the 2011 census was completely register-based. The paper explores censuses in Slovenia since 1991, noting numerous changes and controversies. In 2002, in contrast to 1991, the applied definition of the resident population left out some 35,000 people working temporarily abroad. In addition, the 2002 census witnessed the highest ever number of ethnically non-affiliated respondents. An even bigger controversy was related to the erasure of some 30,000 people from the register of permanent residents for failing to apply for Slovenian citizenship after the break-up of Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenes in Italy: a Fragmented Minority
    Europ. Countrys. · 1· 2016 · p. 49-66 DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0004 European Countryside MENDELU SLOVENES IN ITALY: A FRAGMENTED MINORITY Ernst Steinicke1, Igor Jelen2, Gerhard Karl Lieb3, Roland Löffler4, Peter Čede5 Received 30 July 2015; Accepted 18 March 2016 Abstract: The study examines the Slovenian-speaking minority in the northern Italian autonomous region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia. It explores the spatial fragmentation in the Slovenian settlement area in Italy and analyzes the socio-economic and demographic processes that exert influence on the minority. The work is based on the critical evaluation of the current status of research, of statistical data from the state censuses and results of own research on site. The Slovenian-language population in the entire region is currently estimated at about 46,000 people. The main settlement area is the eastern border region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia, which is characterized by different cultural and regional identities. While the Slovenian-speaking population of Friuli focuses more on its cultural and regional distinctions, the majority of the Slovenian-language group in Venezia Giulia considers itself a “national minority.” Keywords: national minority, border area, Slovenes, Italy Zusammenfassung: Die Studie untersucht die slowenischsprachige Minderheit in der norditalienischen autonomen Region Friaul-Julisch Venetien. Sie nimmt Bezug auf die räumliche Fragmentierung im slowenischen Siedlungsgebiet in Italien und analysiert jene sozio-ökonomischen und demographischen Prozesse Einfluss auf die Minderheit ausüben. Die Arbeit beruht auf der kritischen Auswertung des Forschungsstandes, offizieller statistischer Daten sowie eigenen Erhebungen vor Ort. Schätzungen zufolge beläuft sich die slowenische Sprachgruppe in der gesamten Region derzeit auf etwa 46.000 Personen.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Slovenia and the Slovenes
    SLOVENIA AND THE SLOVENES: A SMALL STATE IN THE NEW EUROPE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Cathie Carmichael,James Gow | 245 pages | 26 Nov 2010 | C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd | 9781850659440 | English | London, United Kingdom Slovenia and the Slovenes: A Small State in the New Europe PDF Book The Slovene Partisans retained their specific organizational structure and Slovene language as their commanding language until the last months of World War II, when their language was removed as the commanding language. Main article: Italian war crimes. Can I view this online? Abe's own undisputed artistic legacy is limited to twenty-six graphic works, including classroom studies, most of them at the National Gallery of Slovenia. Pages: Abe's training methods were adopted and reused by Russian artists both at home Grabar, Kardovsky and in emigration Bilibin, Dobuzhinsky. In this highly imaginative work, the author argues that Slovenes provide a remarkable counterbalance to Western notions of a divided inner and outer self by playing with surface level resemblances, or likenesses. Can I borrow this item? The merger of the Slovene Partisans with Tito's forces happened in Traces of the Slovene language are found in documents of the ninth century, a system of peasant democracy is recorded in medieval times, and a Slovene Bible appeared as early as Ask a librarian. Fascist Italy. Slovenia portal. The book, by ethnologist Janez Bogataj, memorializes the "Treasures of Slovenia" exhibition which was presented around the world. Since its independence in , Slovenia has put in place democratic institutions of state organization, undergone major capital rearrangements, and achieved both of the starting objectives of new international involvement by entering the EU and NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Maritime Border Dispute
    UNDER THE ISTRIAN SUN: NAVIGATING INTERNATIONAL LAW SOLUTIONS FOR THE SLOVENIA- CROATIA MARITIME BORDER DISPUTE CHRISTOPHER M. HARTLEY* ABSTRACT Twenty-eight years after Slovenia and Croatia exited the Federation of Yugoslavia on the eve of its bloody civil war, the two countries are still plagued by a maritime border dispute in the northern Adriatic Sea.1 Given that the countries were not in conflict with each other during the war, and given their similar goals for integration into the greater European and international communities, it is perplexing that they have not been able to resolve this dispute. The Bay of Piran (or, Piran Bay), located in the narrow Gulf of Trieste at the land border of the two countries and having a unique, heavily indented geography, is ground zero of this dispute.2 The pivotal issues are sovereign control of the bay itself and access for Slovenian vessels to international waters, a concept that is foreclosed under traditional law of the sea maritime border principles given the constraints of the bay and Slovenia’s miniscule coastline.3 *Assistant Professor, Department of Law, United States Military Academy, West Point. The author is an active duty Army Judge Advocate. The author was a United States military liaison to the Republic of Slovenia’s Ministry of Defense from October 1995 through July 1996. Numerous visits to the Slovenian and Istrian region since his residence there help broaden his unique perspective about this dispute. The views expressed here are the author’s personal views and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Defense, the United States Army, the United States Military Academy, or any other department or agency of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations (1 year embargo) 2012 Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941 Dejan Kralj Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss_1yr Part of the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Kralj, Dejan, "Balkan Minds: Transnational Nationalism and the Transformation of South Slavic Immigrant Identity in Chicago, 1890-1941" (2012). Dissertations (1 year embargo). 4. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss_1yr/4 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations (1 year embargo) by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2012 Dejan Kralj LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO BALKAN MINDS: TRANSNATIONAL NATIONALISM & THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH SLAVIC IMMIGRANT IDENTITY IN CHICAGO, 1890-1941 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY DEJAN KRALJ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2012 Copyright by Dejan Kralj, 2012 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is quite a difficult task to thank everyone that has helped me throughout this epic scholarly journey. However, many deserve recognition for the roles they played guiding me through to the end of my graduate career. Foremost in mind, I must thank Lillian Hardison, the heart and soul of the history graduate department at Loyola. Your support and friendship have meant the world to me and countless other graduate students that have made their way through the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    SOUTHERN SLAVS IN UTAH Miners, including Southern Slavs, at Scofield Southern Slavs, comprising Slovenes, Croats, and Serbs, formed another aspect of the "new" immigration that arrived in Utah in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. As with other southern and eastern European groups, South Slavs were drawn to Utah for its mining and railroading opportunities. The first wave arrived in the late 1890s, congregating in the coal-mining regions of southeastern Utah, particularly Carbon County. These peoples, labeled as "Austrians," were a significant force in the Carbon County coal mines in the 1903-04 strike. Slovenes, Croats, and Serbs came from Austria-Hungary, from the provinces of Croatia-Slavonia, Carniola, Dalmatia, Bosnia, and Herzegovina. They generally came from farming villages that were homogenous in their particular culture, language, and religion. Serbs were Serbian Orthodox, while Slovenes and Croats were Roman Catholic. Slavic immigration into Utah was but one manifestation of a general Southern Slav population movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. First attracted to the East and Midwest, many Southern Slavs left communities there to seek greater opportunities in the American West, including Utah. In addition to Carbon County, these immigrants traveled to Ogden, working for the Union Pacific Railroad, and to the mines of Bingham Canyon, Alta, and Park City, as well as to the smelters of the Salt Lake Valley. A second wave came to Utah in the period prior to World War I. A pattern of migration developed between the mining areas of Utah, Colorado, Montana, and Nevada. The flow was based upon the seasonal demand for coal, causing men to migrate to metal­ 1 of 5 mining areas when coal mines experienced a slowdown.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of Alpine Slovenes
    On the Origin of Alpine Slovenes Aleš Iglič University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Some historians believe that Slovenes were drawn into the European cultural circle by (Bavarian) feudalism, although it is this very same feudalism that also prevented them access to the resources needed for their social and cultural development – it is precisely this fact, they suggest, that presented one of the most significant obstacles for the further development of the Slovene nation. We cannot agree with this viewpoint. Rather, Slovenes owe their inclusion in the medieval European civilisation, which originates from European antique traditions stemming from ancient Greece, primarily to Roman and other indigenous peoples, as well as to Christian missionaries from the non-Germanic parts of Europe (Iglič, 2007a), i.e. Ireland and the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, who spread Christianity and the culture of the antiquity in the region of the Diocese of Salzburg, from where missionaries came to Carantania, Carniola and Lower Pannonia (Fig. 1). The first Apostle of Carantania Modestus, for example, was sent to Carantania on the orders of the Irish monk Vergilius of Salzburg (Gruden, 1992). Overall, Irish monks contributed greatly to the preservation of the European civilisation in the Early Middle Ages also in other parts of Europe (Cahill, 1995). By passing on the preserved antique knowledge, for example literacy, onto the barbarian peoples, Byzantine missionaries from Greece and Aquileia (Grivec, 1927; Bratož, 1990) as well as Irish missionaries (monks) preserved the European civilisation, which is based on the accomplishments of ancient Greece in the fields of philosophy, science, art, and political organisation (democracy).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia to Predict the Outcome
    Open Political Science, 2020; 3: 1–10 Research Article Thomas Kennedy* Using Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia to predict the outcome of the dissolution of states: factors that lead to internal conflict and civil war https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2020-0001 received December 17, 2019; accepted February 5, 2020. Abstract: During the process of the dissolution of countries, there exist multiple critical junctures that lead to the partition of the territory, where the different groups cannot find a consensus on who rules and how to organize the government. The outcome of these crossroad decisions and political dynamics, who are often set-up centuries ago, either lead to conflict or relative peace between the nations and peoples who express opprobrium towards each other. The most recent cases of the divorce of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia have many similitudes and are therefore appropriate to attempt to theoretically analyze the essential difference between these two types of partitions. The Yugoslav situation led to War between the nations of Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia and Serbia, with an estimated 140,000 citizens of the former Yugoslav Republics killed, while the Czechoslovak case led to an innocuous settlement of differences and the creation of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, who joined the European Union ten years later and saw zero casualties. It is worthwhile to study the relationship between the dissolution of states and conflict using the Czechoslovak and Yugoslav cases for three main reasons. First, the similitude of the two instances enables one to identify variables that bring the outcome of having either peaceful relations or conflict between divorcing nations.
    [Show full text]