DOCSLIB.ORG

Paris 1919: Yugoslav Position Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paris 1919: Yugoslav Position Paper PARIS 1919: YUGOSLAV POSITION PAPER War Experience Throughout the nineteenth and early-twentieth century, as the Balkan peoples achieved their independence from Ottoman rule, a popular notion developed in the area that a common language among the South Slav peoples signified a common nationality as well. While Slovenian had emerged as a distinct language, Serbian and Croatian were almost identical. The Yugoslav idea of one nation-state was always strongest among the Croats inside Austria-Hungary, who feared that they were being made into Germans or Hungarians. Under Ante Trumbic (1864- 1938), a Croat who became the foreign minister of the emerging state, a Yugoslav National Committee formed in June 1915 in order to work for a federation of South Slavs Separate nationalism, however, developed in the Balkans throughout the years leading up to the First World War as well, and such divisions threatened the dream of a Yugoslavia. Experiences during the conflict tended to only exacerbate tensions. Croatia, Slovenia, and Bosnia remained a part of Austria-Hungary, and many of their soldiers fought loyally for the empire until the very end. Croats, Slovenes, Bosnians, and even Serbs, served in the Austrian armies which bombarded Serbia’s capital, Belgrade, and subsequently occupied the country. Whatever their complicity might have been in the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the state of Serbia paid a heavy price. More than 120,000 of its citizens died in the war, out of a population of 4.5 million. Of all the belligerent nations, Serbia lost the highest percentage of troops at the front: 40%. By war’s end, such cooperation between recent enemies was improbable. On the other hand, clear alternatives did not always present themselves to the players involved. As Austria-Hungary began to collapse, its South Slavs turned, many with reluctance, toward independence. Even the Serbians, temporally humbled by defeat and by the collapse of their great protector, Russia, became more receptive to the idea of a Yugoslav state. In exile in Corfu, their leading representative, Nikola Pasic (1845-1926), who had been prime minister of Serbia for years, met with Trumbic. In July 1918, the two men agreed that Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, including those in Bosnia, whether Muslim or not, would be united into one state, with the king of Serbia as ruler. For the Yugoslav National Committee, union with Serbia, whatever its drawbacks (Trumbic regarded the Serbs as barbarians, deeply brutalized by their long years under Ottoman rule), seemed less frightening then the rise of two or three weak and vulnerable little states. Tensions, however, persisted. The two sides, for example, put off discussing a constitution: the issue of federation (which the Croats and Slovenes wanted) or a unity state (which Pasic desired) was never settled. More seriously, in the months after the Corfu declaration, Pasic moved away from a genuine union, working behind the scenes to make certain that the Entente did not recognize the Yugoslav Committee as the voice of the South Slavs from Austria Hungary. Pasic believed that Serbia had liberated the South Slavs from Austria- Hungary, that the Corfu Declaration had been only for propaganda, and that Serbia should head any new state. Anyone who did not like such an arrangement could go elsewhere. Well before the Peace Conference started, the South Slavs took matters into their own hands. In Zagreb, the capital of Croatia, a National Council of Croats, Serbs and Slovenes declared its independence from Austria-Hungary on October 29, 1918. Pasic, however, was already moving quickly to insure Serbian control over the other national groups. Although the Allies compelled 1 him to form a coalition government with the Council in the second week of November, Pasic made sure to neutralize it. On the ground, the Serbian army, as an Allied force, was fanning out across Austrian territory, first to the north and south, and then, by November, into Croatia and Slovenia. When the Yugoslav volunteers, some 80,000 soldiers from Austria-Hungary now fighting on the Allied side, trued to win Allied recognition as an occupation force, Pasic, to the dismay of Trumbic and other Croats, thwarted such efforts. With Serbian encouragement, self- appointed assemblies in the Banat and in Bosnia-Herzegovina voted for union with Serbia. In Montenegro, which was under Serbian occupation, a national assembly, voted hastily to depose their king and unite with Serbia. In Zagreb, the National Council started to panic, for it had no forces of its own. On November 25, it hastily resolved to ask Serbia for union as well. On December 1, 1918, Prince Alexander of Serbia proclaimed the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, with its capital in Belgrade. The conviction of many Serbians that they had increased their own territory rather than founded a new country, and their suspicion that the Croats, Slovenes and Bosnian Muslims had not truly tried to liberate themselves from the Habsburgs, did not bode well for future cooperation between national groups. Although Serbs made up less than half the population, they ran the new country. The Serbian army became the Yugoslav army, and within the bureaucracy and various ministries, Serbs held almost all the important posts. Conference Expectations Already by the time of the Conference, the emerging state was in possession of much of what it wanted: Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Slovene heartland in the old Austrian province of Carniola, much of Dalmatia, and the old kingdom of Croatia-but it wished for more. Composed of about hundred members, the delegation comprised Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Bosnians and Montenegrins, each group with varying interests. The delegates from the Adriatic side of the country, for example, mainly Slovene and Croat, expressed passionate concern about security from Italy and control over ports and railways that had once belonged to Austria-Hungary, but were quite indifferent to border changes in the east. The Serbs, meanwhile, were prepared to trade away Dalmatia or Istria in order to acquire more territory to the north and east. In order to satisfy all, six of the seven borders were open for discussion. Only the border with Greece in the former Ottoman territory of Macedonia was left alone. In the west, Slovenes insisted on Klagenfurt, on the north side of the southern spur of the Alps, as security against what was left of Austria. The Serbs main concern, including Pasic, who headed the entire Yugoslav delegation, was to push eastward into Bulgaria and north of the Danube, taking Hungarian territory (the Baranya and the Backa) as protection for the capital. The Serbs were to deny that they were asking for non-Slav areas by indicating that the old censuses were unreliable. The peacemakers had little to guide them when grappling with the Balkans. Wilson stressed notions of self-determination and friendships among neighbors in the area, but remained vague concerning specifics. The British preferred strong states to counter Germany and Russia, but was not prepared to do much to secure the well-being of Yugoslavia. France was most supportive of the emerging state, believing that it, along with Czechoslovakia and Poland, would provide a counterbalance to Germany. On the opposite side, the Italians were most concerned, for although they were generally happy to see the end of Austria-Hungary, they did not want any other power to achieve dominance in the Balkans. 2 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy Sean Krummerich University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, and the European History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Krummerich, Sean, "Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nationalitätenrecht: The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy by Sean Krummerich A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor, Graydon A. Tunstall, Ph.D. Kees Botterbloem, Ph.D. Giovanna Benadusi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 6, 2012 Keywords – Austria, Hungary, Serb, Croat, Slovene Copyright © 2012, Sean Krummerich Dedication For all that they have done to inspire me to new heights, I dedicate this work to my wife Amanda, and my son, John Michael. Acknowledgments This study would not have been possible without the guidance and support of a number of people. My thanks go to Graydon Tunstall and Kees Boterbloem, for their assistance in locating sources, and for their helpful feedback which served to strengthen this paper immensely.
    [Show full text]
  • YUGOSLAVIA Official No
    YUGOSLAVIA Official No. : C. 169. M. 99. 1939. Conf. E. V. R. 23. Geneva, August 1939. LEAGUE OF NATIONS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE O N RURAL LIFE National Monographs drawn up by Governments YUGOSLAVIA Series of League of Nations Publications EUROPEAN CONFERENCE « « O N RURAL LIFE ^ « 5 Peasant from the Cettinje neighbourhood (Montenegro). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I n t r o d u c t io n ................................................................................................ 5 I. P op u lation : General C onsiderations............................ g II. A griculture : Structure........................................................ 16 III. A grarian R e f o r m .................................................................. 18 1. Ancient Provinces of the Voivodine, Syrmia, Slavonia, Croatia and S lo v en ia .................... 18 2. Southern S e r b i a ......................................................... 19 3. Bosnia and H erzegovina.......................................... 19 4 . D a lm a tia ....................................................................... 19 IV. T echnical I mprovement of the So i l ....................... 21 V. Improvement of Live-stock and Plants .... 24 VI. A gricultural In d u st r ie s .................................................... 27 VII. L and Settlemen r .................................................................. 28 Technical and Cultural Propaganda in Country D i s t r i c t ............................................................................. 30 VIII. A gricultural Co-operation
    [Show full text]
  • Oligarchs, King and Local Society: Medieval Slavonia
    Antun Nekić OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May2015 OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ External Reader Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest Month YYYY I, the undersigned, Antun Nekić, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of the work of others, and no part of the thesis infringes on any person’s or institution’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • S. Transdanubia Action Plan, by Pécs-Baranya, HU
    Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism (CCT) in Europe Action Plan for South Transdanubia, Hungary ChamMap of partnerber of are Commercea / Partner info and Industry of Pécs- Baranya May 2021 Cultural and Creative Industries contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism in Europe _________________________ © Cult-CreaTE Project Partnership and Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya, Hungary This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-CreaTE Project Management and Coordination Unit and the respective partner: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-CreaTE Action Plan Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs- Baranya, Hungary The Cult-CreaTE Project Communications unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this action plan as a source, sent to e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya and in no way reflect the views of the Cult-CreaTE partnership, the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – Was Formed in 1918, One of I
    Introduction When the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – from 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia – was formed in 1918, one of its most important tasks was to forge a common collective identity. Intellectual elites in the young state with great optimism agreed that education would play a crucial role in this process. It should come as no surprise, then, that a relatively rich tradition of scholarly research into the representation of collective identities in Yugoslav education has originated, precisely to account for the failure of the Yugoslav project in the long term. Recently, a growing body of scholarly research has established textbooks as one of the more rewarding sources for studying collective identity in education, focusing on ‘what knowledge is included and rejected in ... textbooks, and how the transmission of this selected knowledge often attempts to shape a particular form of national memory, national identity and national consciousness’.1 For the Yugoslav case this emerging research field so far has primarily examined textbooks which were used in the period directly preceding, during and following the disintegration of Yugoslavia.2 However, as the present article hopes to illustrate, textbook analysis can also provide the historian with interesting new elements for the study of collective identities in Yugoslavia’s more distant past. With its focus on national identity in Serbian, Croatian and Slovenian textbooks before the First World War, and later also in interwar Yugoslavia, the work of Charles Jelavich still occupies a somewhat
    [Show full text]
  • POPULATION DEVELOPMENT of SLOVENIA from the BEGINNING of COUNTING to the PRESENT DAY Damir Josipovi~
    POPULATION DEVELOPMENT OF SLOVENIA FROM THE BEGINNING OF COUNTING TO THE PRESENT DAY Damir Josipovi~ According to its numbers, the Slovene population belongs ethnically and nationally among the small- er populations of European countries. However, it is distinguished by its historic endurance and continuity in Slovenia and in neighbouring areas since the 6th century. The existence of the Slovene people as an ethnic group that survived in spite of strong assimilation pressures and which managed to preserve the Slovene language as the main distinguishing component of ethnicity largely throughout its rural hinterland provided the foundation for the formation of modern Slovenia. Throughout its history from its initial colonization in the 6th century, Slovene ethnic territory shrank constantly. In the first few cen- turies after colonization, the settling area of our Slovene ancestors encompassed the majority of the territory of today's Austria, more than a third of Hungary and Croatia, and eastern border areas of today's Italy. Relative to the size of today's Slovenia, this ethnic territory shrank most in the north and east, and least in the west. As an independent country, Slovenia is the millennium-long dream of the Slovene people come true, but a considerable area populated by speakers of autochthonous Slovene dialects still remains outside the state borders. Thus today, Slovenia has autochthonous minorities in all four neighbouring countries. In the time since the first estimates of the population on the territory of today's Slovenia in the mid- dle of the 18th century and the first censuses a good century later, the Slovene population has not increased as other European populations then comparable with the Slovene population have.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    The Historical Review/La Revue Historique Vol. 5, 2008 Andrej Mitrovic, Serbia's Great War, 1914-1918 Pavlowitch Stevan University of Southampton https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.233 Copyright © 2008 To cite this article: Pavlowitch, S. (2009). Andrej Mitrovic, Serbia's Great War, 1914-1918. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 5, 261-267. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.233 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 02/10/2021 08:23:40 | Andrej Mitrovi≠, SERBIA’S GREAT WAR, 1914-1918, Introduction by Professor Mark Cornwall, London: Hurst & Company, 2007, xvi + 386 pages. Serbia’s “Great War” was indeed la Grande Guerre, that of 1914-1918. Too often, history books now remember only that Serbia was the (unwilling) cause of that war, and public perception then fast-forwards to the 1990s, when Serbia was generally cast as the villain of the “wars of the Yugoslav succession”. Even to students of World War I, it seems to disappear from the screen between December 1915 – when it collapsed under the onslaught of German, Austro- Hungarian and Bulgarian armies – and September 1918 – when an Allied offensive, with a resurrected Serbian army, broke through the Thessaloniki Front. Yet at the time, Serbia’s resistance, the winter retreat of its aged monarch, with officialdom, parliament, army and countless refugees, was the stuff of legend. A wave of Serbophilia swept through public opinion in Allied countries – notably in France and Great Britain. V. Eski¶evi≠’s painting, reproduced as a well-known picture postcard and used as the cover illustration of the volume here reviewed, symbolises it.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship
    Štiks, Igor. "Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs." Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. 25–36. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474221559.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 07:06 UTC. Copyright © Igor Štiks 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs The revolver came from Serbia, but the finger that pulled the trigger that would kill Franz Ferdinand and thus announce the end of one world and the birth of another acted upon two strong beliefs. If one can judge from his statement, underage Gavrilo Princip, like so many of his peers, was foremost convinced that South Slavs should be liberated from a foreign yoke and unite in their own state; this belief was strongly though not articulately mixed with another conviction that the world about to come must be the world of profound social transformation. Two motives with which our story of ‘one hundred years of citizenship’ begins will be repeated in many different forms during this century: should South Slavs have their own common state? Or form separate ones? And, regardless of the answer, should political transformations entail more social equality or only a change of the rulers at the top of the existing hierarchy? Every idea often has deep roots and various historic materializations.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of the Regions – Slovenia Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000 – VIII, 80 Pp
    PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS 13 17 KS-29-00-779-EN-C PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: ECU 25,00 ISBN 92-828-9403-7 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION L-2985 Luxembourg ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA EUROPEAN COMMISSION ࢞ I eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-9404-5 © European Communities, 2000 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium II PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS eurostat Foreword The accession discussions already underway with all ten of the Phare countries of Central and Eastern Europe have further boosted the demand for statistical data concerning them. At the same time, a growing appreciation of regional issues has raised interest in regional differences in each of these countries. This volume of the “Portrait of the Regions” series responds to this need and follows on in a tradition which has seen four volumes devoted to the current Member States, a fifth to Hungary, a sixth volume dedicated to the Czech Republic and Poland, a seventh to the Slovak Republic and the most recent volume covering the Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Examining the 12 statistical regions of Slovenia, this ninth volume in the series has an almost identical structure to Volume 8, itself very similar to earlier publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the National Question in Slovenia Before 1914 W
    SOCIAL SCIENCES 331 Marxism and the National Question in Slovenia before 1914 w. A. OWINGS, Oldahoma City UDiverslty The Slovenes, a South Slav people, before 1914 were contained within the Austrian part of the Austro-Hungartan empire. They were one of the smaller nations, numbering about 1,200,000. Their lands were of stra­ tegic significance, lying directly across the communications routes from both Vienna and Budapest to Trieste. The combined factors of numerical weakness, strategic location, and Hapsburg determination to maintain the integrity of the Empire made it almost inconceivable that the Slovenes might ever become independent. They were a highly nationalistic people, however, and by the mJddle of the nineteenth century sought relief from Austro-German domJnation. Their aspirations were couched in the form of demands for cultural and political a.utonomy within the Empire. Among the advocates of autonomy were the social democrats. Theo­ retically Marxists should have had no interest in nationalism; reality dic­ tated that they, like any other powerseekers, develop a national program. Their program represents a particularly clear-cut example of the influ­ ence of local political environment on the evolution of policy of a :Marxist party. The purpose of this paper is to examine (1) the character18tic approach of Slovenes to the national question; (2) the emphasis of 80Clal democrats on parliamentary reform; (3) the synthesis of those elements which comprised the Slovenlan SD national program; and (4) the fate of that program when introduced into the cockpit of politics. The approach of Slovenes to the national question wu conditioned by the fact that they were an "unhistorical" people; that 18, unlike the Czechs and Croats, they had no history as a separate political entity which might afford a legal precedent for claims to political autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia and the Census: from the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-Based Census of 2011 Research Article
    Slovenia and the Census: From the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-based Census of 2011 Research Article Damir Josipovič Senior Scientific Associate, Institute for Ethnic Studies in Ljubljana [email protected] http://www.suedosteuropa.uni-graz.at/cse/en/josipovic Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2015, 2(2), 159-75 Contemporary Southeastern Europe is an online, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, scholarly, and policy-oriented research on issues relevant to societies in Southeastern Europe. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.contemporarysee.org Slovenia and the Census: From the 20. Century Yugoslav Counts to the Register-based Census of 2011 Damir Josipovič The article critically examines censuses in the Republic of Slovenia. Owing to its Yugoslav past, the censuses after 1945 have been closely scrutinized, and the common Yugoslav census methodology had a strong influence on the 1991 and 2002 censuses. The 1991 enumeration was carried out within the Yugoslav state; however the data processing and result publishing was done under the newly independent Slovenian state. The 2002 census was the last census to be carried out using classic door-to-door enumeration, since the 2011 census was completely register-based. The paper explores censuses in Slovenia since 1991, noting numerous changes and controversies. In 2002, in contrast to 1991, the applied definition of the resident population left out some 35,000 people working temporarily abroad. In addition, the 2002 census witnessed the highest ever number of ethnically non-affiliated respondents. An even bigger controversy was related to the erasure of some 30,000 people from the register of permanent residents for failing to apply for Slovenian citizenship after the break-up of Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]