DOCSLIB.ORG

Byron and Moore, 1811-1824

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Byron and Moore, 1811-1824 1 THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN BYRON AND THOMAS MOORE, 1811-1824 Edited by Peter Cochran, with much welcome assistance from Jeffery Vail. Updated June 9th 2012. This correspondence is unique in that most of Byron’s letters to Moore have been lost. They seem to have disappeared some time during the 1840s, and we have to rely on the censored transcriptions which Moore made of them for his 1830 / 1 Life of Byron (for the sole exception, see this edition’s final item). William St Clair argues ( The Temptations of a Biographer: Thomas Moore and Byron, Byron Journal 17, 1989, pp.50-6), that Moore’s texts show signs of having been both cut and added to, with a view to increasing the affection and literary regard for him which Byron expresses. Jeffery W. Vail (The Literary Relationship of Lord Byron and Thomas Moore , Johns Hopkins 2001, pp.195-8), argues against this thesis. In his Life , Moore indicated his major cuts by asterisks, but didn’t mark his additions (if such there be) at all. See the two versions of Byron to Moore, July 10th 1817, below. Conversely, at least fifty-one letters from Moore to Byron are missing. Two previously unknown and unsuspected ones are those of July 11th 1813, and July 8th 1822. To give some idea of Tom Moore’s personality, and the way he charmed even the most tight-lipped, here is an extract from Hobhouse’s diary, September 1818. The place is Sir Francis Burdett’s estate at Ramsbury in Wiltshire: [Commentary :] Tom Moore turns up! He sings, records the disdainful Hobhouse, “one or two of his own songs in his own peculiar style”. Titles mentioned are The Evening Bells and Strike the Loud Cymbal . What Hobhouse feels when “Susan [Burdett] sang with him” we have to imagine, for Hobhouse does not record it. But the next day, Moore’s charm wins over even the unmusical diarist: Tuesday September 8th. Burdett, Davies, Moore and myself walked from twelve to six in the forest, and had a delightful day. Moore was everything – his Irish stories kept us in a constant roar – his anecdotes of Curran and others, perfect. He talked, however, too much of himself, made his dinner at Dublin lately given to him a test of Irish patriotism, and he confessed he could not repent enough he had ever lived with lords – there was not the parity he sighed for. He mentioned anecdotes of Lord Holland and Lord Lansdowne to prove it. He was angry with George Vernon for calling him, Crabbe and Bowles “three poets” – and with Lord Holland for using the words “one of us”. He told us he had received £900 already from Longman for his Fudge Family – he talked of classical subjects, of Paris, of Payne Knight and others, equally well. He beat all three of us out of the field, and I saw Scrope was envious. I, who have no pretension to conversational powers, was delighted. Amongst his stories was this: ‘An Irish chatenist[??] asked me, “How many gods are there?” – “Three.” – “May you never see one of them!” was her answer’. We dined, had music in the evening, and were most charmed. Alone among Byron’s regular correspondents, Moore is treated by Byron as an equal (“I don’t much care what the wretches of the world think of me—all that’s past. But I care a good deal what you think of me, and, so, say what you like” – Byron to Moore, February 2nd 1818). Posterity has not agreed that they are equals, but Byron regards Moore as a poet of stature comparable to himself: he even pays Moore the compliment of imitating his style in several works. Only with the publication of Lalla Rookh 2 in 1817 does he pause to reflect – and doesn’t have the nerve to tell Moore his real opinion, or his critical reflections about the decline of English poetry which have arisen. The missing Moore letters leave a number of intriguing and annoying blanks: what did Moore think of Don Juan ? We know he disapproved of Cain . Why did Byron’s idea for them to run a joint periodical fail, thereby thrusting him (to Moore’s horror) into the arms of Shelley and Leigh Hunt? The thought that most of Moore’s letters to Byron, all but one of Byron’s letters to Moore, and above all Moore’s own copy of Byron’s Memoirs, are sleeping, crated and uncatalogued, in some American Xanadu, or mouldering away in some Wiltshire attic, troubles one’s sleep. My thanks to David McClay, Rachel Beattie, and their colleagues at the National Library of Scotland. I am also very grateful to John and Virginia Murray for permission to quote (where necessary) texts from Byron’s Letters and Journals , ed. Leslie A. Marchand (John Murray 1973-1994). This is referred to as BLJ. Sections in bold type are added from BLJ XI 196-8. My special thanks to Jeffery W. Vaill for his help. Dowden: The Letters of Thomas Moore . Ed. Wilfred Dowden, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964. MJ: Journal of Thomas Moore , ed. Dowden et al, Newark 1983-91. NLS: National Library of Scotland. Moore to Byron, from 22 Molesworth Street, Dublin, January 1st 1810: (Source: Ms. not found; text from Moore’s Life) Moore’s first letter to Byron, He does not know that Byron is out of the country. Dublin, January 1. 1810. My Lord, Having just seen the name of ‘Lord Byron’ prefixed to a work entitled ‘English Bards and Scotch Reviewers,’ in which, as it appears to me, the lie is given to a public statement of mine, respecting an affair with Mr. Jeffrey some years since, 1 I beg you will have the goodness to inform me whether I may consider your Lordship as the author of this publication. I shall not, I fear, be able to return to London for a week or two; but, in the mean time, I trust your Lordship will not deny me the satisfaction of knowing whether you avow the insult contained in the passages alluded to. It is needless to suggest to your Lordship the propriety of keeping our correspondence secret. I have the honour to be Your Lordship’s very humble servant, THOMAS MOORE. 22. Molesworth Street. July 14th 1811: Byron returns from his eastern travels. September 9th 1811: Moore’s play M.P.; or the Blue-Stocking premiered. Byron to Moore, from Cambridge, October 27th 1811. (Source: Ms. not found; text from Moore’s Life I 309-10; LJ II 59-63; QI 125-6; BLJ II 118-19) Byron’s first letter to Moore; he has heard about Moore’s “challenge”, and answers the previous item, twenty-two months late. Cambridge, October 27. 1811. Sir, 1: See EBSR, 490-7: But Caledonia’s Goddess hovered o’er The field, and saved him [Jeffrey ] from the wrath of MOORE ; From either pistol snatched the vengeful lead, And straight restored it to her favourite’s head. That head, with greater than magnetic power, Caught it, as Danæ caught the golden shower, And, though the thickening dross will scarce refine, Augments its ore, and is itself a mine. 3 Your letter followed me from Notts, to this place, which will account for the delay of my reply. Your former letter I never had the honour to receive;—be assured, in whatever part of the world it had found me, I should have deemed it my duty to return and answer it in person. The advertisement you mention, I know nothing of.—At the time of your meeting with Mr. Jeffrey, I had recently entered College, and remember to have heard and read a number of squibs on the occasion; and from the recollection of these I derived all my knowledge on the subject, without the slightest idea of ‘giving the lie’ to an address which I never beheld. When I put my name to the production, which has occasioned this correspondence, I became responsible to all whom it might concern,—to explain where it requires explanation, and, where insufficiently, or too sufficiently explicit, at all events to satisfy. My situation leaves me no choice; it rests with the injured and the angry to obtain reparation in their own way. With regard to the passage in question, you were certainly not the person towards whom I felt personally hostile. On the contrary, my whole thoughts were engrossed by one, whom I had reason to consider as my worst literary enemy, 2 nor could I foresee that his former antagonist was about to become his champion. You do not specify what you would wish to have done: I can neither retract nor apologise for a charge of falsehood which I never advanced. In the beginning of the week, I shall be at No. 8. St. James’s Street.—Neither the letter nor the friend to whom you stated your intention ever made their appearance. Your friend, Mr. Rogers, or any other gentleman delegated by you, will find me most ready to adopt any conciliatory proposition which shall not compromise my own honour,—or, failing in that, to make the atonement you deem it necessary to require. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient, humble servant, BYRON. Byron to Moore, from St James’s Street, London, October 29th 1811: (Source: Ms. not found; text from Moore’s Life I 311; LJ II 63-4; BLJ II 120-1) Written two days after the previous item, in answer to another Moore letter, now missing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Work Has Been Submitted to Chesterrep – the University of Chester’S Online Research Repository
    'Every Irishman is an Arab': James Clarence Mangan's Eastern 'Translations' Item Type Article Authors Fegan, Melissa Citation Translation and Literature, Summer 2013, 22(2), pp. 195-214 DOI 10.3366/tal.2013.0113 Publisher Edinburgh University Press Journal Translation and Literature Download date 28/09/2021 04:50:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/336545 This work has been submitted to ChesterRep – the University of Chester’s online research repository http://chesterrep.openrepository.com Author(s): Melissa Fegan Title: 'Every Irishman is an Arab': James Clarence Mangan's Eastern 'Translations' Date: Summer 2013 Originally published in: Translation and Literature Example citation: Fegan, M. (2013). 'Every Irishman is an Arab': James Clarence Mangan's Eastern 'Translations', Translation and Literature, 22(2), 195-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/tal.2013.0113 Version of item: Accepted manuscript Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10034/336545 ‘Every Irishman is an Arab’: James Clarence Mangan’s Eastern ‘Translations’ If the vagrant Imagination is at home anywhere, it is the East, proclaimed James Clarence Mangan (1803-1849) – even if its conception of the East is somewhat illusory, and dominated by ‘images of Genii-land’ rather than a realistic Orient.1 Mangan – unkindly described by Valentine Cunningham as the ‘archetypical drunken- Irish poet’2 – is chiefly remembered for stirring nationalist anthems like ‘Dark Rosaleen’, or his depictions of the horrors of the Great Famine. The young James Joyce described him as ‘the national poet’,3 but Mangan’s leanings were international, and his delight in the East emerged in a series of six articles on Oriental poetry, titled ‘Literæ Orientales’, published in the Dublin University Magazine between September 1837 and January 1846.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Swift Address by Dr Don Thornhill, St Patrick's Cathedral
    Jonathan Swift Address by Dr Don Thornhill, St Patrick’s Cathedral, Dublin, 17 October, 2010 I would like to thank my friend and neighbour from Co Waterford, the Very Reverend Dr Robert McCarthy for giving me the honour and pleasure of speaking here this afternoon. But some caveats and acknowledgements are in order. As regards the caveats I hope that in inviting me here, as the Dean himself wrote, to speak, and I quote, “on any aspect of Swift”, the Dean was not, like his predecessor, being ironic. I am not a historian or a literary scholar. My interests are some distance away in economic policy, taxation and competitiveness, public sector reform and education policy. In the arenas where these topics are discussed I and other have preached from time to time – but never before from a pulpit! But I was helped by the patience, support and critical contributions (critical in both senses of the word!) of my family, particularly Maura, and of my friends during the past few months. I would like to thank Dr Ronan Kelly, author of Bard of Erin, a much acclaimed biography of Thomas Moore, who gave me essential advice and guidance. In our current economic circumstances it would, of course be tempting in response to the Dean’s invitation by quoting liberally from Swift’s commentaries on human foolishness and injustices. His saeva indignatio/ savage indignation, some of which he directed at bankers, undoubtedly has a contemporary resonance 1. A “What would Swift say if he were alive today ” exercise could be entertaining and maybe cause some bitter amusement but others are better equipped to do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Tales” – the Siege of Corinth and Parisina – Were Still to Come
    1 THE CORSAIR and LARA These two poems may make a pair: Byron’s note to that effect, at the start of Lara, leaves the question to the reader. I have put them together to test the thesis. Quite apart from the discrepancy between the heroine’s hair-colour (first pointed out by E.H.Coleridge) it seems to me that the protagonists are different men, and that to see the later poem as a sequel to and political development of the earlier, is not of much use in understanding either. Lara is a man of uncontrollable violence, unlike Conrad, whose propensity towards gentlemanly self-government is one of two qualities (the other being his military incompetence) which militates against the convincing depiction of his buccaneer’s calling. Conrad, offered rescue by Gulnare, almost turns it down – and is horrified when Gulnare murders Seyd with a view to easing his escape. On the other hand, Lara, astride the fallen Otho (Lara, 723-31) would happily finish him off. Henry James has a dialogue in which it is imagined what George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda would do, once he got to the Holy Land.1 The conclusion is that he’d drink lots of tea. I’m working at an alternative ending to Götterdämmerung, in which Brunnhilde accompanies Siegfried on his Rheinfahrt, sees through Gunther and Gutrune at once, poisons Hagen, and gets bored with Siegfried, who goes off to be a forest warden while she settles down in bed with Loge, because he’s clever and amusing.2 By the same token, I think that Gulnare would become irritated with Conrad, whose passivity and lack of masculinity she’d find trying.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrin Zeenat. “Writing Irish Nationhood: Jonathan Swift's Coming to Terms
    Nebula 6.2 , June 2009 Writing Irish Nationhood: Jonathan Swift’s Coming to Terms with his Birthplace. By Afrin Zeenat “Swift can…combine contraries of the most compelling kind.” 1 Seamus Deane. “… the Janus-faced ambivalence of language… in the construction of the Janus-faced discourse of the nation.” 2 Homi K. Bhabha Echoing Bhabha’s statement, Jonathan Swift’s “Janus-faced ambivalence” toward his birthplace Ireland has puzzled many readers making it difficult for them to identify him as an Irish patriot. 3 Despite Swift’s works on Ireland in which he rallies for Ireland and the native Irish, many critics continue to stress Swift’s anathema and contempt for people of his native land. 4 Such an essentialist reading of Swift would fail to understand the innate ambivalence that is a salient feature of his works. Swift’s Irish tracts point to a change in his attitude towards his native land, which asserts itself forcefully as his love for England and things English ebb, and can be attributed to personal, political and historical reasons. Swift’s life and works presage the ambivalence that is later pronounced in the works of post-colonial writers, who often vacillate between the country of their colonial overlords and their native countries. Based on Frantz Fanon’s ideas on the formation of a national consciousness,5 this chapter will trace a similar formation of Swift’s national consciousness for his native country, which finds a voice in his works on Ireland. 1 Seamus Deane, “Classic Swift,” The Cambridge Companion to Jonathan Swift, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 245.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: a Literary-Biographical-Critical
    1 GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: A literary-biographical-critical database 2: by year CODE: From National Library in Taiwan UDD: unpublished doctoral dissertation Books and Articles Referring to Byron, by year 1813-1824: Anon. A Sermon on the Death of Byron, by a Layman —— Lines on the departure of a great poet from this country, 1816 —— An Address to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, with an opinion on some of his writings, 1817 —— The radical triumvirate, or, infidel Paine, Lord Byron, and Surgeon Lawrenge … A Letter to John Bull, from a Oxonian resident in London, 1820 —— A letter to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, protesting against the immolation of Gray, Cowper and Campbell, at the shrine of Pope, The Pamphleteer Vol 8, 1821 —— Lord Byron’s Plagiarisms, Gentleman’s Magazine, April 1821; Lord Byron Defended from a Charge of Plagiarism, ibid —— Plagiarisms of Lord Byron Detected, Monthly Magazine, August 1821, September 1821 —— A letter of expostulation to Lord Byron, on his present pursuits; with animadversions on his writings and absence from his country in the hour of danger, 1822 —— Uriel, a poetical address to Lord Byron, written on the continent, 1822 —— Lord Byron’s Residence in Greece, Westminster Review July 1824 —— Full Particulars of the much lamented Death of Lord Byron, with a Sketch of his Life, Character and Manners, London 1824 —— Robert Burns and Lord Byron, London Magazine X, August 1824 —— A sermon on the death of Lord Byron, by a Layman, 1824 Barker, Miss. Lines addressed to a noble lord; – his Lordship will know why, – by one of the small fry of the Lakes 1815 Belloc, Louise Swanton.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Anyone Know Lord Byron?
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 1998 Does anyone know Lord Byron? Dianne Marie Waylett Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Waylett, Dianne Marie, "Does anyone know Lord Byron?" (1998). Theses Digitization Project. 1507. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1507 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOES ANYONE KNOW LORD BYRON? A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies by Dianne Marie Waylett September 1998 DOES ANYONE KNOW LORD BYRON? A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Dianne Marie Waylett September 1998 Approved by; ^^rtram H. Fairdhild, Chair7- English Date Susan'Melsenhelder, English Mlfchael Weiss/ Psychology ABSTRACT Lord Byron's seductive personality has enthralled, titillated, and mesmerized his followers, past and present, with a power unequaled and unattained by other celebrity poets. With equal power he has shocked, estranged, angered, and enraged his antagonists. He has been loved and adored as a heroic champion of the oppressed masses, and shunned as an evil genius. His extremes of temperament have earned him the label manic depressive—a catch-all disorder that has become an abyss into which current researchers have system atically thrust scores of the world's best-known, exception ally creative minds.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Manfred Lord Byron (1788–1824)
    Manfred Lord Byron (1788–1824) Dramatis Personæ MANFRED CHAMOIS HUNTER ABBOT OF ST. MAURICE MANUEL HERMAN WITCH OF THE ALPS ARIMANES NEMESIS THE DESTINIES SPIRITS, ETC. The scene of the Drama is amongst the Higher Alps—partly in the Castle of Manfred, and partly in the Mountains. ‘There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.’ Act I Scene I MANFRED alone.—Scene, a Gothic Gallery. Time, Midnight. Manfred THE LAMP must be replenish’d, but even then It will not burn so long as I must watch. My slumbers—if I slumber—are not sleep, But a continuance of enduring thought, 5 Which then I can resist not: in my heart There is a vigil, and these eyes but close To look within; and yet I live, and bear The aspect and the form of breathing men. But grief should be the instructor of the wise; 10 Sorrow is knowledge: they who know the most Must mourn the deepest o’er the fatal truth, The Tree of Knowledge is not that of Life. Philosophy and science, and the springs Of wonder, and the wisdom of the world, 15 I have essay’d, and in my mind there is A power to make these subject to itself— But they avail not: I have done men good, And I have met with good even among men— But this avail’d not: I have had my foes, 20 And none have baffled, many fallen before me— But this avail’d not:—Good, or evil, life, Powers, passions, all I see in other beings, Have been to me as rain unto the sands, Since that all—nameless hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Huguenot Merchants Settled in England 1644 Who Purchased Lincolnshire Estates in the 18Th Century, and Acquired Ayscough Estates by Marriage
    List of Parliamentary Families 51 Boucherett Origins: Huguenot merchants settled in England 1644 who purchased Lincolnshire estates in the 18th century, and acquired Ayscough estates by marriage. 1. Ayscough Boucherett – Great Grimsby 1796-1803 Seats: Stallingborough Hall, Lincolnshire (acq. by mar. c. 1700, sales from 1789, demolished first half 19th c.); Willingham Hall (House), Lincolnshire (acq. 18th c., built 1790, demolished c. 1962) Estates: Bateman 5834 (E) 7823; wealth in 1905 £38,500. Notes: Family extinct 1905 upon the death of Jessie Boucherett (in ODNB). BABINGTON Origins: Landowners at Bavington, Northumberland by 1274. William Babington had a spectacular legal career, Chief Justice of Common Pleas 1423-36. (Payling, Political Society in Lancastrian England, 36-39) Five MPs between 1399 and 1536, several kts of the shire. 1. Matthew Babington – Leicestershire 1660 2. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1685-87 1689-90 3. Philip Babington – Berwick-on-Tweed 1689-90 4. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1800-18 Seat: Rothley Temple (Temple Hall), Leicestershire (medieval, purch. c. 1550 and add. 1565, sold 1845, remod. later 19th c., hotel) Estates: Worth £2,000 pa in 1776. Notes: Four members of the family in ODNB. BACON [Frank] Bacon Origins: The first Bacon of note was son of a sheepreeve, although ancestors were recorded as early as 1286. He was a lawyer, MP 1542, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1558. Estates were purchased at the Dissolution. His brother was a London merchant. Eldest son created the first baronet 1611. Younger son Lord Chancellor 1618, created a viscount 1621. Eight further MPs in the 16th and 17th centuries, including kts of the shire for Norfolk and Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Caroline Lamb and Her Circle
    APPENDIX Lady Caroline Lamb and her Circle Who’s Who Bessborough, Lord (3rd Earl). Frederick Ponsonby. Father of Lady Caroline Lamb. Held title of Lord Duncannon until his father, the 2nd Earl, died in 1793. Bessborough, Lady (Countess). Henrietta Frances Spencer Ponsonby. Mother of Lady Caroline and her three brothers, John, Frederick, and William. With her lover, Granville Leveson-Gower, she also had two other children. Bruce, Michael. Acquaintance of Byron’s who had an affair with Lady Caroline after meeting her in Paris in 1816. Bulwer-Lytton, Edward. Novelist and poet, he developed a youthful crush on Lady Caroline and almost became her lover late in her life. Byron, Lord (6th Baron). George Gordon. Poet and political activist, he had many love affairs, including one with Lady Caroline Lamb in 1812, and died helping the Greek revolutionary movement. Byron, Lady. Anne Isabella (“Annabella”) Milbanke. Wife of Lord Byron and cousin of Lady Caroline’s husband, William Lamb. Canis. (see 5th Duke of Devonshire) Cavendish, Georgiana. (Little G, or G) Lady Caroline Lamb’s cousin, the elder daughter of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. Later Lady Morpeth. 294 Lady Caroline Lamb Cavendish, Harriet Elizabeth. (Harryo) Lady Caroline Lamb’s cousin, the younger daughter of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. Later Lady Granville. Churchill, Susan Spencer. Illegitimate daughter of Harriet Caroline Spencer, a relative of Lady Caroline’s, who became the ward of William and Lady Caroline Lamb. Colburn, Henry. Publisher of Lady Caroline’s most famous novel, Glenarvon (1816). Colburn ran a very active business that published a great quantity of British women’s fiction of the early nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, Written by Himself, Ed. By
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com 4c 102,1 MEMOIRS THE LIFE OF SIR SAMUEL ROMILLY, WRITTEN BY HIMSELF; WITH A SELECTION FROM HIS CORRESPONDENCE. EDITED BY HIS SONS. IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. III. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. MDCCCXL. 1031. London : Printed by A. Spottiswoode, New- Street- Square. CONTENTS THE THIRD VOLUME. DIARY OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIFE OF SIR SAMUEL ROMILL Y — {continued). 1812. Slave trade ; Registry of slaves Bristol election; candidates; Mr. Protheroe. — Resolution of the Independent Club, and letter respecting it Mr. Protheroe; Hunt Address to the electors. — Mr. Rider's motion, police of the metro polis ; increase of crime. — Abuses in Ecclesiastical Courts ; Sir Wm. Scott. — Bristol election ; letter to Mr. Edge. — Reversion Bill. — Bill to repeal 39 Eliz. — Transportation to New South Wales. — The Regent's determination to re tain the ministers; his letter to the Duke of York. — Colonel M'Mahon's sinecure. — Delays in the Court of Chancery ; Michael Angelo Taylor. — Master in Chancery not fit mem ber of a committee to inquire into the delays of the court. — Expulsion of Walsh from the House of Commons. — Local Poor Bills; Stroud. — Military punishments; Brougham. — Bill to repeal 39 Eliz. ; Lord Ellenborough. — Abuses of charitable trusts ; Mr. Lockhart. — Visit to Bristol, reception, Speech second address to the electors. — Military punishments. — Cobbett's attack. — Committee on the delays in the Court of Chancery. — Disqualifying laws against Catholics.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Taylor Coleridge John Spalding Gatton University of Kentucky
    The Kentucky Review Volume 4 Number 1 This issue is devoted to a catalog of an Article 6 exhibition from the W. Hugh Peal Collection in the University of Kentucky Libraries. 1982 Catalog of the Peal Exhibition: Samuel Taylor Coleridge John Spalding Gatton University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Gatton, John Spalding (1982) "Catalog of the Peal Exhibition: Samuel Taylor Coleridge," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 4 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol4/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Samuel Taylor Coleridge Gc car un1 To brc de~ In Wordsworth's judgment, Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) was "the most wonderful man" he ever met. Endowed with one of So1 the most brilliant and complex minds of his day, he would, like bUJ Chaucer's parson, "gladly .. learn, and gladly teach." If he an< squandered a wealth of thought in correspondence and wh conversation, and left unfinished or merely projected major poems, Rh lectures, and systematic expositions of his philosophical tenets, his pre critical theories, and his theology, he nevertheless produced a vast So1 and impressive array of poetry, prose, and criticism.
    [Show full text]