DOCSLIB.ORG

Is God Expanding, Too

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is God Expanding, Too Is God Expanding, Too (bara’, “to create”) “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Psalm 19:1 A journey on the evolution of our understanding of the universe and of our notion of God. First United Methodist Church of Arroyo Grande Leader: Jamie Foster Is God Expanding, Too?, Leader: Jamie Foster, printed 9/11/11, page 1. Is God Expanding, Too? First United Methodist Church of Arroyo Grande, 275 N. Halcyon. The class will be lead by Jamie Foster. It will consist of five 2.5-hour sessions (including a meal), Wednesdays 6:00-8:30pm, July 3, 7, 10, 17, 24, and 30, 2002. Tentative schedule and outline: This course will explore the interface between science and religion using the issues of creation and the universe as the medium. It will be an exploratory journey for all involved (don’t expect “answers”). We’ll grapple with what we know, or with what we think we know, regarding the creation of the universe and its fundamental laws (of physics), and with what God has to do with that. And we’ll look broadly at how science and religion relate. Participants will go away with some marvelous thoughts, ideas, and questions to ponder. 1. Introduction: how the course will be conducted, review/expand this outline, distribute materials. Has our understanding or concept of God been keeping pace with science’s understanding of our world? How do you describe God today? 2. Getting a grip on the universe via color slides, including an exposure to cosmological issues. Some of the WOW! facts of the bigger world in which we live, and the tiny world of which it’s made. Drawing the universe on 2 sheets of paper. 3. Detailed tracing of the evolution of man’s understanding of the origins and structure of the universe from Egyptians, Sumerians, Phoenicians, Greeks, Euclid, Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Einstein... 4. The Big Bang: An overview of theoretical and astro- physics as its relates to our universe from Time=0, or What we seem to know about how the world ticks and the laws of nature. 5. Discussion of the evolution of our understanding of God, and how theologians view creation. 6-8. Blending science and religion, particularly regarding cosmological and laws-of-nature issues: Does religion take into account what science knows? Should it? Does science tell us anything about freedom, evil and suffering, religious intolerance, or predestination? What are the “theories” and “data” of religion, and what are the “traditions” and “judgments” of science? What role does revelation play, either on the road to Damascus (Paul) or Bowes Moor (Fred Hoyle)? Does the universe need a Creator? Does design imply a Designer? How do the methodologies of science and of religion compare and contrast? How can we know something without knowing everything? What does it mean to be both observer and participant? What does it mean for something to “exist?” How do we have faith, but not blind faith? Just how rational is the universe? How do super colliders research religion? Is the universe intelligent or intelligible? Can beauty be a guide to truth? Does God play dice? Are they loaded? 8. Wrap up. How do you describe God now? Is God Expanding, Too?, Leader: Jamie Foster, printed 9/11/11, page 2. Table of Contents Is God Expanding, Too? ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Big Bang ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Timeline from Earth’s (our) point of view... ......................................................................................................................................... 6 The Creation Story (Genesis 1-2:3) ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wow! ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Definitions .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Table of the Particles ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18 .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 A Chronology of the Evolution of Science ........................................................................................................................................... 20 A Chronology of the Evolution of the Concept of God ...................................................................................................................... 33 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Einstein, Christmas, and Infinity ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 In The Beginning...There Was A Computer...And God Said... ......................................................................................................... 48 Session 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Session 2: Getting a Grip on the Universe via slides .......................................................................................................................... 53 Session 3: Discussing the Evolution of Cosmology (and science) ...................................................................................................... 63 Session 4: The Big Bang ........................................................................................................................................................................ 64 Session 5: Historical Notions of God .................................................................................................................................................... 69 Session 6: How Science and Religion Operate / The Creation Story ................................................................................................ 72 Session 7: The Big Questions ................................................................................................................................................................ 81 Session 8: The Big Questions (continued); Wrap Up ......................................................................................................................... 84 This document was prepared using MS Word 2000 on an IBM PC. Machine-readable copies are available on a CD-ROM in any of the formats that Word will output. The fractals were generated using WinFract v18.21, and are also available. Pi was calculated using PiW v1.31 and is available up to 250,000 digits. No charge; just ask... Is God Expanding, Too?, Leader: Jamie Foster, printed 9/11/11, page 3. The Big Bang T=0 Creation. Infinite Singularity? T=10-43 second Planck barrier, before which all calculations break down, can’t describe space, time, matter, etc. The universe is at about 1032 degrees and the size of an atom. Gravity separates from “parent” force. For all practical purposes, this is the beginning of the Universe. The density of the universe is 1096 times that of water. One unit of quantum time. T=10-35 second Strong nuclear force begins separating out, universe is 10-24 centimeters big and 1028 degrees Kelvin (K). Baryon synthesis. X bosons are transmuting between quarks and leptons. After this point, X bosons cannot exists as the universe further cools, so they decay into quarks and anti-quarks at different rates. This difference ultimately results in the proton:anti-proton imbalance (1 billion and 1 : 1 billion). The inflationary period begins due to phase changes of particles and consequent release of energy. T=10-30 second The asymmetric decay of X particles is complete, and the ultimate matter:anti-matter ratio of the universe is fixed. T=10-32 second Universe is softball size, at 1027 degrees Kelvin. T=10-20 second Hawking’s mini blackholes are done; today, 100 million per cubic light year (theoretically). T=10-18 second The universe is a million billion degrees - staggering, but reproducible (for fractions of a second) in modern accelerators. T=10-12 second Universe is about 1015 degrees (1 trillion degrees). T=10-10 second Weak force and Electromagnetic force separate as W and Z particles decay. Universe is about the same size as today’s solar system. T=10-7 second Proton creation at 100,000,000,001 protons to 100,000,000,000 anti-protons resulting in today’s ratio of 100,000,000,000 photons (created by one proton annihilating one anti-proton) to the one remaining proton. T=10-5 second Meson creation. T=10-4 second Quarks form protons and neutrons in a sea of neutrinos, electrons, and photons. Universe is 1012
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances to the Hydra
    The Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances to the Hydra and Coma Clusters 1 Joseph B. Jensen John L. Tonry and Gerard A. Luppino Institute for Astronomy, UniversityofHawaii 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT We present IR surface brightness uctuation (SBF) distance measurements to NGC 4889 in the Coma cluster and to NGC 3309 and NGC 3311 in the Hydra cluster. We explicitly corrected for the contributions to the uctuations from globular clusters, background galaxies, and residual background variance. We measured a distance of 85 10 Mp c to NGC 4889 and a distance of 46 5 Mp c to the Hydra cluster. 1 1 Adopting recession velo cities of 7186 428 km s for Coma and 4054 296 km s 1 1 for Hydra gives a mean Hubble constantofH =87 11km s Mp c . Corrections 0 for residual variances were a signi cant fraction of the SBF signal measured, and, if underestimated, would bias our measurementtowards smaller distances and larger values of H . Both NICMOS on the Hubble Space Telescop e and large-ap erture 0 ground-based telescop es with new IR detectors will make accurate SBF distance measurements p ossible to 100 Mp c and b eyond. Subject headings: distance scale | galaxies: clusters: individual (Hydra, Coma) | galaxies: individual (NGC 3309, NGC 3311, NGC 4889) | galaxies: distances and redshifts 1. Intro duction Measuring accurate and reliable distances is a critical part of the quest to measure the Hubble constant H .Until recently, di erenttechniques for estimating extragalactic distances 0 1 Currently with the Gemini 8-m Telescop es Pro ject, 180 Kino ole St.
    [Show full text]
  • Aa/Ruitlt IV ] of I '•
    NI BTIS-mf—9024 fe LJOL aa/ruitLt IV ] of I '• I Il'•ir . GALAXIES IN LOW DENSITY REGIONS OF THE UNIVERSE I >A'ji Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor in de Tl Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen aan de Rijksuni- r versiteit te Leiden, op gezag van de Rector f i Magnificus Dr. A.A.H. Kassenaar, hoogleraar in de faculteit der Geneeskunde, volgens besluit van het college van dekanen te verdedigen op woensdag 28 september 1983 te klokke 16.15 uur door NOAH BROSCH geboren te Boekarest (Roeaenie) in 1948 Promotoren-.Prof .Dr. J.liayo Greenberg W: Prof .Dr. W.W. Shane |r \f Referent :Dr.J. Lub / l I 'A '! 8.' ?•• i Table of Contents Chapter I Introduction and Background. .1 Chapter II Pccurate Optical Positions of Isolated Galaxies 10 1982,Rst ron.flst rophys .,Supp1. 46,63 Chapter III Photoelectric Photometry at the Wise 7; Observatory 17 Chapter Multiaperture Photometry of Isolated Galaxies 37 'i 1382,Rstrophys.J. 253,526 Chapter V Multiaperture Photometry of Galaxies:II. Near Infrared Photometry of Six Isolated i Objects 50 1982,Rstron.Pstrophys. 113,231 :J 't" Chapter VI 5 GHz Observations of Isolated and Group Galaxies 56 1983.Submitted to flstron.Rstrophys. Appendix R Samples of Isolated Systems 85 Chapter VII Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry of Five Isolated Galaxies 90 1383,Submitted to Rstron.Rstrophys. Appendix B Isolated and Normal Galaxies in the UV...113 Chapter VIII Rdditional Observational Data and Overview of the Thesis ,. 117 Samenvatting 134 t Curriculum 136 acknowledgements ' 137 Hebrew Summary 138 Chapter I p V Kant speculated in 1755 that the nebulae,now called >:c: galaxies,were remote, independent stellar systems, or "island |' universes',as they were subsequently called (Shane,1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Challenges
    This page intentionally left blank Cosmic Challenge Listing more than 500 sky targets, both near and far, in 187 challenges, this observing guide will test novice astronomers and advanced veterans alike. Its unique mix of Solar System and deep-sky targets will have observers hunting for the Apollo lunar landing sites, searching for satellites orbiting the outermost planets, and exploring hundreds of star clusters, nebulae, distant galaxies, and quasars. Each target object is accompanied by a rating indicating how difficult the object is to find, an in-depth visual description, an illustration showing how the object realistically looks, and a detailed finder chart to help you find each challenge quickly and effectively. The guide introduces objects often overlooked in other observing guides and features targets visible in a variety of conditions, from the inner city to the dark countryside. Challenges are provided for viewing by the naked eye, through binoculars, to the largest backyard telescopes. Philip S. Harrington is the author of eight previous books for the amateur astronomer, including Touring the Universe through Binoculars, Star Ware, and Star Watch. He is also a contributing editor for Astronomy magazine, where he has authored the magazine’s monthly “Binocular Universe” column and “Phil Harrington’s Challenge Objects,” a quarterly online column on Astronomy.com. He is an Adjunct Professor at Dowling College and Suffolk County Community College, New York, where he teaches courses in stellar and planetary astronomy. Cosmic Challenge The Ultimate Observing List for Amateurs PHILIP S. HARRINGTON CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521899369 C P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngc Catalogue Ngc Catalogue
    NGC CATALOGUE NGC CATALOGUE 1 NGC CATALOGUE Object # Common Name Type Constellation Magnitude RA Dec NGC 1 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:07:16 27:42:32 NGC 2 - Galaxy Pegasus 14.2 00:07:17 27:40:43 NGC 3 - Galaxy Pisces 13.3 00:07:17 08:18:05 NGC 4 - Galaxy Pisces 15.8 00:07:24 08:22:26 NGC 5 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:07:49 35:21:46 NGC 6 NGC 20 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 7 - Galaxy Sculptor 13.9 00:08:21 -29:54:59 NGC 8 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:08:45 23:50:19 NGC 9 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.5 00:08:54 23:49:04 NGC 10 - Galaxy Sculptor 12.5 00:08:34 -33:51:28 NGC 11 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.7 00:08:42 37:26:53 NGC 12 - Galaxy Pisces 13.1 00:08:45 04:36:44 NGC 13 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.2 00:08:48 33:25:59 NGC 14 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.1 00:08:46 15:48:57 NGC 15 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.8 00:09:02 21:37:30 NGC 16 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:04 27:43:48 NGC 17 NGC 34 Galaxy Cetus 14.4 00:11:07 -12:06:28 NGC 18 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:09:23 27:43:56 NGC 19 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:10:41 32:58:58 NGC 20 See NGC 6 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 21 NGC 29 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 22 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.6 00:09:48 27:49:58 NGC 23 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:53 25:55:26 NGC 24 - Galaxy Sculptor 11.6 00:09:56 -24:57:52 NGC 25 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.0 00:09:59 -57:01:13 NGC 26 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:10:26 25:49:56 NGC 27 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.5 00:10:33 28:59:49 NGC 28 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.8 00:10:25 -56:59:20 NGC 29 See NGC 21 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 30 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:10:51 21:58:39
    [Show full text]
  • T He Cool Stellar P Opulations of E Arly-T Y Pe G
    T h e C o ol S t e l l a r P o pu l a t io n s o f E a r l y -T y p e G a l a x ie s a n d t h e G a l a c t ic B ulge dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Mark Lee Houdashelt, 3|C $ J ) t + $ The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Prof. Jay A. Frogel Prof. Kristen Sellgren /J (J Advisor Prof. Donald M. Temdrup Department of Astronomy ONI Number: 9533992 UMI Microform 9533992 Copyright 1995, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, united States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 To Mom and Tim ii A cknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my mother, Darlene, and my brother, Tim, for their unwavering support before, during, and (hopefully) after my graduate studies. Without them, I would not have achieved as much as I have nor be as happy as I am. Thank you, Mom amd Tim, for all that you have done for me. Obviously, I am deeply indebted to my advisor, Jay Frogel, for his support (both financial and otherwise), his scientific expertise and his belief in my abilities. He suggested the initial dissertation project to me and helped me to redefine it along the way, always remaining positive and encouraging.
    [Show full text]
  • QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY of GALAXIES in the CORE of the COMA CLUSTER Carlos M
    The Astrophysical Journal, 602:664–677, 2004 February 20 A # 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF GALAXIES IN THE CORE OF THE COMA CLUSTER Carlos M. Gutie´rrez, Ignacio Trujillo,1 and Jose A. L. Aguerri Instituto de Astrofı´sica de Canarias, E-38205, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Alister W. Graham Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 and Nicola Caon Instituto de Astrofı´sica de Canarias, E-38205, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Received 2003 July 26; accepted 2003 October 17 ABSTRACT We present a quantitative morphological analysis of 187 galaxies in a region covering the central 0.28 deg2 of the Coma Cluster. Structural parameters from the best-fitting Se´rsic r1=n bulge plus, where appropriate, expo- nential disk model, are tabulated here. This sample is complete down to a magnitude of R ¼ 17 mag. By examining the recent compilation by Edwards et al. of galaxy redshifts in the direction of Coma, we find that 163 of the 187 galaxies are Coma Cluster members and that the rest are foreground and background objects. For the Coma Cluster members, we have studied differences in the structural and kinematic properties between early- and late-type galaxies and between the dwarf and giant galaxies. Analysis of the elliptical galaxies reveals correlations among the structural parameters similar to those previously found in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters. Comparing the structural properties of the Coma Cluster disk galaxies with disk galaxies in the field, we find evidence for an environmental dependence: the scale lengths of the disk galaxies in Coma are 30% smaller.
    [Show full text]
  • 8: Galaxies, Nuclei & Quasars
    8: Galaxies, Nuclei & Quasars Physics 17: Black Holes and Extreme Astrophysics Goals • Introduce different types of galaxy • See how most galactic nuclei contain black holes • Describe what happens when galactic nuclei became active • Discuss the physical interpretation and consequences of this activity Reading Begelman & Rees • Chapter 3: Discovery of black holes (p77-79, 95-101, 109-113) BigI Spiral Galaxies • Young, blue stars • Rich in gas and forming new stars • Supported by rotation • Disc with central bulge • Dark matter • Billions of solar masses • 100,000 light years across M31 Sombrero Galaxy Whirlpool Galaxy The Milky Way (seen from within!) BigI Elliptical Galaxies • Old, red stars • Gas poor – “red and dead” • Slowly rotating • Dark matter • Millions to 10 billion Solar masses NGC 1316 NGC 4881 M87 BigI Irregular Galaxies • Around 10% locally • More than 50% when Universe was young • Many show mergers • Spiral galaxies, pulled together by gravity, can merge, eventually forming an elliptical galaxy • May be the building blocks of regular galaxies The Mice The Cartwheel Mayall’s Object Large and small Magellanic Clouds Hubble Ultra Deep Field • 12 days total exposure time of a small ‘empty’ patch of sky between known galaxies, 0.00001% of sky • 10,000 galaxies seen • 13 billion light years away • Light takes 13 billion years to reach us • Some of the first galaxies that formed in the Universe BigI Galaxy Clusters • Galaxies live in groups or clusters — the Milky Way is in the “Local Group” and our nearest neighbor is the Andromeda
    [Show full text]
  • The Ks-Band Tully–Fisher Relation – a Determination of the Hubble Parameter from 218 Sci Galaxies and 16 Galaxy Clusters
    J. Astrophys. Astr. (2009) 30, 93–118 The Ks-band Tully–Fisher Relation – A Determination of the Hubble Parameter from 218 ScI Galaxies and 16 Galaxy Clusters David G. Russell Owego Free Academy, Owego, NY 13827, USA. e-mail: [email protected] Received 2007 April 27; accepted 2009 June 10 Abstract. The value of Hubble parameter (H0) is determined using the morphologically type dependent Ks-band Tully–Fisher Relation (K-TFR). The slope and zero point are determined using 36 calibrator galaxies with ScI morphology. Calibration distances are adopted from direct Cepheid dis- tances, and group or companion distances derived with the Surface Bright- ness Fluctuation Method or Type Ia Supernova. It is found that a small morphological type effect is present in the K-TFR such that ScI galax- ies are more luminous at a given rotational velocity than Sa/Sb galaxies and Sbc/Sc galaxies of later luminosity classes. Distances are determined to 16 galaxy clusters and 218 ScI galaxies with minimum distances of 40.0 Mpc. From the 16 galaxy clusters a weighted mean Hubble parameter −1 −1 of H0 = 84.2 ± 6kms Mpc is found. From the 218 ScI galaxies a −1 −1 Hubble parameter of H0 = 83.4 ± 8kms Mpc is found. When the zero point of K-TFR is corrected to account for recent results that find a Large Magellanic Cloud distance modulus of 18.39±0.05, a Hubble para- meter of 88.0 ± 6kms−1 Mpc−1 is found. Effects from Malmquist bias are shown to be negligible in this sample as galaxies are restricted to a minimum rotational velocity of 150 km s−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Science & Astronomy for the Logic Stage
    Earth Science & Astronomy for the Logic Stage Teacher Guide 2 Earth Science & Astronomy for the Logic Stage Teacher Guide Second Edition, Second Printing Copyright @ Elemental Science, Inc. Digital Edition Printed in the USA for worldwide distribution For more copies write to: Elemental Science PO Box 79 Niceville, FL 32588 [email protected] Copyright Policy All contents copyright © 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017 by Elemental Science. All rights reserved. No part of this document or the related files may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the author. The author does give permission to the original purchaser to photocopy the tests and Appendix material for use within their immediate family only. Limit of Liability and Disclaimer of Warranty: The publisher has used its best efforts in preparing this book, and the information provided herein is provided “as is.” Elemental Science makes no representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaims any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and shall in no event be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damage, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Trademarks: This book identifies product names and services known to be trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of their respective holders. They are used throughout this book in an editorial fashion only. In addition, terms suspected of being trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks have been appropriately capitalized, although Elemental Science cannot attest to the accuracy of this information.
    [Show full text]
  • A Database of Cepheid Distance Moduli and TRGB, GCLF, PNLF and SBF Data Useful for Distance Determinations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server A Database of Cepheid Distance Moduli and TRGB, GCLF, PNLF and SBF Data Useful for Distance Determinations Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series Laura Ferrarese1;2 Holland C. Ford3, John Huchra4, Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.5, Jeremy R. Mould6, Shoko Sakai7 Wendy L. Freedman8, Peter B. Stetson9, Barry F. Madore10,BradK. Gibson11,JohnA.Graham12, Shaun M. Hughes13, Garth D. Illingworth14,DanielD.Kelson12, Lucas Macri4,KimSebo6 & N.A. Silbermann10 ABSTRACT We present a compilation of Cepheid distance moduli and data for four secondary distance indicators that employ stars in the old stellar populations: the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF), the globular cluster luminosity function (GCLF), the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), and the surface brightness fluctuation (SBF) method. The database includes all data published as of July 15, 1999. The main strength of this compilation resides in all data being on a consistent and homogeneous system: all Cepheid distances are derived using the same calibration of the period-luminosity relation, the treatment of errors is consistent for all indicators, measurements which are not considered reliable are excluded. As such, the database is ideal for inter-comparing any of the distance indicators considered, or for deriving a Cepheid calibration to any secondary distance indicator, such as the Tully-Fisher 1Hubble Fellow 2California Institute of Technology,
    [Show full text]
  • 1977Apj. . .213. .327A the Astrophysical Journal, 213:327-344
    .327A .213. The Astrophysical Journal, 213:327-344, 1977 April 15 . © 1977. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. 1977ApJ. THE LUMINOSITY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE OF THE COMA CLUSTER G. O. Abell Department of Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles Received 1976 August 6 ABSTRACT The luminosity function of the galaxies in the Coma cluster is determined by a procedure of extrafocal photographic photometry. The logarithmic integrated luminosity function rises sharply with increasing magnitude through the interval mv = 11.6 to 14.5, and then slowly for greater magnitudes to the limit mv = 19.4. The data suggest a moderate increase in the slope of the function for magnitudes fainter than mv = 17.5. The cluster is found, in projection, to be ellipsoidal in shape, centered at (1950) a = 12h56IP9; 0 5 = +28 14'. To the limit mv = 18.3 the cluster is estimated to have 1525 member galaxies. The brighter galaxies in the inner part of the cluster have a distribution resembling that of the iso- thermal polytrope, but there is no marked segregation of bright and faint galaxies, as would be required for complete statistical equilibrium. The luminosity of the cluster is estimated at 2 x 1013 L©. The mass-to-light ratio (in solar units) is found probably not to exceed 122. Subject headings: galaxies : clusters of—galaxies: photometry I. INTRODUCTION II. OBSERVATIONS The first important discussion of the galaxian a) Photometric Procedure luminosity function was by Hubble (1926), who Galaxian magnitudes are obtained here by a investigated the absolute magnitudes of 134 late method of extrafocal photographic photometry spirals and 11 irregular galaxies (most of which are described by Abell and Mihalas (1966).
    [Show full text]
  • The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale XXVI
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale XXVI. The Calibration of Population II Secondary Distance Indicators and the Value of the Hubble Constant Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Laura Ferrarese1;2, Jeremy R. Mould3, Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.4, John Huchra5, Holland C. Ford 6 , Wendy L. Freedman7, Peter B. Stetson8, Barry F. Madore9, Shoko Sakai10,BradK. Gibson11,JohnA.Graham12, Shaun M. Hughes13, Garth D. Illingworth14,DanielD.Kelson12, Lucas Macri5,KimSebo3, & N.A. Silbermann9 ABSTRACT A Cepheid-based calibration is derived for four distance indicators that utilize stars in the old stellar populations: the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF), the globular cluster luminosity function (GCLF) and the surface brightness fluctuation method (SBF). The calibration is largely based 1 on the Cepheid distances to 18 spiral galaxies within cz = 1500 km s− obtained as part of the HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale, but relies also on Cepheid distances from separate HST and ground-based efforts. The newly derived calibration of the SBF method is applied to obtain distances to four Abell clusters in 1Hubble Fellow 2California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA 3Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Institute of Advanced Studies, ANU, ACT 2611, Australia 4Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721, USA
    [Show full text]