DOCSLIB.ORG

Breeding Habitat Structure and Use by Kansas-Occurring Black Rail" (2011)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Spring 2011 Breeding Habitat Structure And Use By Kansas- Occurring Black Rail Stephanie A. Kane Fort Hays State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kane, Stephanie A., "Breeding Habitat Structure And Use By Kansas-Occurring Black Rail" (2011). Master's Theses. 150. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/150 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. BREEDING HABITAT STRUCTURE AND USE BY KANSAS-OCCURRING BLACK RAIL being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Fort Hays State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Stephanie A. Kane B.S., Colorado State University Date. ____________ Approved,_______________ _ Major Professor Approved,______________ _ Chair, Graduate Council This Thesis for The Master of Science Degree By Stephanie A. Kane Has Been Approved Supervisory Committ e ef_::_ ~-" Supervisory Committee cSvLi, -,~, ,\LQ'--\..1-0 1 This thesis is written in the style appropriate for publication in The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 11 ABSTRACT Two subspecies of Black Rail Laterallus jamaicenis occur in the United States, and neither has been studied extensively. Of the two, the Eastern subspecies L. j. jamaicenis has a larger range, but has been studied to a lesser degree than the California subspecies (L. j. coturniculus Eastern Black Rail are known to breed at several locations in Kansas, but as in other inland populations, precisely where these individuals overwinter is unknown. Additionally, little information is available on characteristics of breeding habitat for inland Eastern Black Rail populations, and few studies have investigated the effect of habitat management techniques on these populations. Eastern Black Rail are rnost often observed in Kansas at Quivira National Wildlife Refuge NWR and private lands surrounding it. Call playback surveys were conducted in the summers of 2009 and 2010 to locate breeding individuals and identify nesting habitat. Drift-fences and traps were set in locations where individual Black Rail were detected, and sound samples were used to attract individuals for capture. Rectrices and body coverts were plucked from similar regions on two captured individuals and used for deuterium stable isotope analysis. Coverts had average deuterium values of -86.2 and -77.8 per mil, respectively. These values are more typical for southern Canada and portions of the western United States. These feather values suggest that Kansas- occurring Black Rail either winter away from the Gulf Coast, in contrast to current understanding, or grow feathers during or soon after spring migration. Quivira NWR and surrounding private lands use prescribed burning, grazing and haying to manage vegetation in the wet-meadow habitat that the rails typically occupy. To characterize breeding habitat, I quantified vertical vegetation structure, water presence and depth, and plant height in areas where Black Rail responded during playback surveys. A Kruskal-Walis one-way analysis of variance was used to compare these variables among 13 treatment types. Although test iii results indicated these variables were significantly different among treatment types, a non- parametric Tukey's post-hoc test could not detect where the differences occurred. A backward stepwise (Wald) logistic regression indicated higher percentages of dead vegetation in upper vertical layers and plant height positively influenced rail presence, whereas a higher percentage of living vegetation at lower layers negatively influenced rail presence (Nagelkerke R Square 0.57, p < 0.001). Black Rail were most often detected in sections witl1 moderate levels of disturbance (e.g., burned annually, burned and grazed), while areas with higher levels of disturbance (e.g., annual haying, haying and burning) did not appear to possess suitable habitat, as no rails were detected in these locations. J:vloderately disturbed areas, such as those burned every two years, might contain the mosaic of living and dead vegetation necessary for Black Rail nesting habitat in this portion their breeding range. IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the Department of Biological Sciences and Fort Hays State University for giving me the opportunity to conduct this research. I also thank the Kansas Department of Wildlife Parks Chickadee Checkoff Small Grants Program and the Kansas Ornithological Society for helping fund my research. I thank the staff at Quivira National Wildlife Refuge for allowing me to work on refuge land, and private landowners Keith Widener, Ron Rougan, and Allen Sleeper for allowing me to survey on their land. My thanks to Dr. Raymond Lee of Washington State University for his time and effort while running the deuterium stable isotope analyses. "Thank you" to my colleagues in the Department of Biological Sciences, particularly Eleanor Hudson, Elita Baldrige, and Kristen Polacik for maintaining cheerful dispositions while slogging through mosquito-ridden marshes, and Victoria Cikanek for her thoughts on vegetation structure. I thank the faculty in the department for their help and input; in particular Dr.Jordana LaFantasie for her novel ideas on habitat descriptions and measurements, Dr. Robert Channell for extensive assistance and time with statistical analyses, and my committee members, Dr. Brian Maricle, Dr. William Stark, and Suzanne Fellows. Last, I thank my advisor, Dr. Greg Farley, whose valuable guidance, feedback, and advice kept me focused and thinking about my research and career. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL. ................................................................................... i PREFACE............................................................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... iii Acknoledgments ................................................................................................................... V TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF Tables ............................................................................................................................ viii LIS'f OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ X INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 METHODS Surveying .................................................................................................................................. 6 Trapping ................................................................................................................................. 10 Vegetative Structure............................................................................................................. 14 Stable Isotope Analyses ....................................................................................................... 15 Statistical Anal}'ses ................................................................................................................ 16 RESULTS Surveying and Trapping ..................................................................................................... 17 Stable Isotope Analysis ...................................................................................................... 19 Habitat Analyses .................................................................................................................. 19 DISCUSSION Chronology and Breeding Habitat ..................................................................................... 23 vi Trapping................................................................................................................................. 24 Stable Isotope Analysis ........................................................................................................ 26 Habitat Structure .................................................................................................................. 28 Management Effects ............................................................................................................ 29 The Disturbance Continuum .............................................................................................. 32 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 34 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................................... 37 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Treatment types with corresponding management regime, number of surveys, and number of birds detected at Quivira NWR and bordering private lands in 2009 and 2010. The number of surveys (n = 585) in each treatment type was calculated by taking the number of sample points in each treatment area, and multiplying that by the number of surveys. Points on borders between treatments were used in calculations
Recommended publications
  • Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan

    Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan

    University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland Institut of Zoology Ecology of the Black Catbird, Melanoptila glabrirostris, at Shipstern Nature Reserve (Belize), and distribution in Yucatan. J.Laesser Annick Morgenthaler May 2003 Master thesis supervised by Prof. Claude Mermod and Dr. Louis-Félix Bersier CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Aim and description of the study 2. Geographic setting 2.1. Yucatan peninsula 2.2. Belize 2.3. Shipstern Nature Reserve 2.3.1. History and previous studies 2.3.2. Climate 2.3.3. Geology and soils 2.3.4. Vegetation 2.3.5. Fauna 3. The Black Catbird 3.1. Taxonomy 3.2. Description 3.3. Breeding 3.4. Ecology and biology 3.5. Distribution and threats 3.6. Current protection measures FIRST PART: BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND DENSITY AT SHIPSTERN 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Census 4.1.1. Territory mapping 4.1.2. Transect point-count 4.2. Sizing and ringing 4.3. Nest survey (from hide) 5. Results 5.1. Biology 5.1.1. Morphometry 5.1.2. Nesting 5.1.3. Diet 5.1.4. Competition and predation 5.2. Habitat use and population density 5.2.1. Population density 5.2.2. Habitat use 5.2.3. Banded individuals monitoring 5.2.4. Distribution through the Reserve 6. Discussion 6.1. Biology 6.2. Habitat use and population density SECOND PART: DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE RANGE 7. Materials and methods 7.1. Data collection 7.2. Visit to others sites 8. Results 8.1. Data compilation 8.2. Visited places 8.2.1. Corozalito (south of Shipstern lagoon) 8.2.2.
  • BIRD CONSERVATION the Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW

    BIRD CONSERVATION the Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW

    BIRD CONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW Is Species Conservation Enough? How should we as conservationists decide which birds deserve protection? Where should we draw the line that tells us which groups of birds are “unique” enough to merit saving? t one extreme, a conserva- becomes extinct? Do we care about tion skeptic might insist that the continuation of these evolution- Apreserving one type of bird ary processes, or do we take a pass from each genus is sufficient. At the on preserving them because these other, passionate lovers of wildlife birds are not sufficiently “unique”? may not accept the loss of even one When in doubt about whether to individual. A more typical birder take conservation action, I fall back might nominate the species as the on the precautionary principle, key conservation level because the which says, in essence, that when concept of species is familiar to us. l American Dipper: USFWS uncertain about the potential harm- Science gets us closer to the answers, ful effect of an action, the prudent but it cannot draw the line: the purpose of science is course is the conservative one. or, as aldo Leopold to gather knowledge, not to make decisions for us. wrote, “Save all of the pieces.” Furthermore, like life itself, the science of taxonomy is I say, save the Black Hills Dipper regardless of which in a constant state of change. Baltimore and Bullock’s taxonomic opinion prevails; and while we are at it, we Orioles have been “lumped” into Northern Oriole and ought to save Wayne’s Warbler, the rhododendron- then “split” again, all based on the most current scien- dwelling Swainson’s Warbler, and the tree-nesting tific opinion.
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically

    Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically

    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
  • Raccoon Island Phase B 2009 Final EA FONSI

    Raccoon Island Phase B 2009 Final EA FONSI

    PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures are proposed to reduce or eliminate environmental risks associated with the proposed action (herein referred to as the “Project”). Mitigation measures in the form of terms and conditions are added to the negotiated agreement and are shall be considered enforceable as part of the agreement. Application of terms and conditions will be individually considered by the Director or Associate Director of the MMS. Minor modifications to the proposed mitigation measures may be made during the noncompetitive negotiated leasing process if comments indicate changes are necessary or if conditions warrant. Plans and Performance Requirements The NRCS will provide the MMS with a copy of the Project’s “Construction Solicitation and Specifications Plan” (herein referred to as the “Plan”). No activity or operation, authorized by the negotiated agreement (herein referred to as the Memorandum of Agreement or MOA), at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be carried out until the MMS has determined that each activity or operation described in the Plan will be conducted in a manner that is in compliance with the provisions and requirements of the MOA. The preferred method of conveying sediment from the Raccoon Island Borrow Area involves the use of a hydraulic cutterhead dredge and scows. Any modifications to the Plan that may affect the project area, including the use of submerged or floated pipelines to convey sediment, must be approved by the MMS prior to implementation of the modification. The NRCS will ensure that all operations at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be conducted in accordance with the final approved Plan and all terms and conditions in this MOA, as well as all applicable regulations, orders, guidelines, and directives specified or referenced herein.
  • The Rufous-Faced Crake (Laterallus Xenopterus) and Its Paraguayan Congeners

    The Rufous-Faced Crake (Laterallus Xenopterus) and Its Paraguayan Congeners

    THE WILSON BULLETIN A QUARTERLYMAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 93, No. 2 JUNE 1981 PAGES 137-300 Wilson Bull., 93(2), 1981, pp. 137-144 THE RUFOUS-FACED CRAKE (LATERALLUS XENOPTERUS) AND ITS PARAGUAYAN CONGENERS ROBERT W. STORER The Black Rail (Laterullus jamaicensis) and other crakes of the genus Luterallus are among the least known American birds, and Ripley (1977:192) points out that “of all the rail family, this group of species collectively is the least studied.” This is not surprising because they are secretive birds living in dense grassy places. But one relatively tame species, the Galapagos Rail (L. spilonotus) has been well studied in the field (Franklin et al. 1979). A second species, the Red-and-White Crake (L. leucopyrrhus) is commonly kept in aviaries where some of its habits have been reported (Meise 1934, Everitt 1962, Levi 1966). Museum spec- imens of Luterullus are few, hence their distribution and status are poorly known; anatomical material is even scarcer. The least known species of the group, the Rufous-faced Crake (L. xen- opterus), was first taken in Paraguay in 1933 and described the following year (Conover 1934). It was not found again until Philip Myers rediscov- ered it in 1976 and Rick Hansen in 1978 (Myers and Hansen 1980). The species has not been illustrated previously, probably because the tail was missing from the type specimen and information on the color of the soft parts was not available. In 1979, I spent 5 weeks in Paraguay with a field party from the Uni- versity of Michigan Museum of Zoology led by Philip Myers, III.
  • Introduction to Ornithology

    Introduction to Ornithology

    New Jersey School of Conservation One Wapalanne Road Branchville, NJ 07826-5116 800-624-7780 (dial option 3) or 973-948-4646 Fax: 973-948-5131 [email protected] http://www.csam.montclair.edu/njsoc/ Introduction to Ornithology DESCRIPTION: This session is designed to give students an appreciation of the important role birds play in our ecosystem. The students will have the opportunity to see and identify live birds at our feeders as well as simulated wooden birds placed along a trail. This trail is designed to give students practice locating and identifying common species of birds. The twelve stations that are part of the trail highlight a variety of birds and habitats. The trail is “teacher friendly” in that the accompanying teacher’s manual provides photographs and information about each bird along the trail. OBJECTIVES: • Students will be able to track the evolution of birds from their reptilian ancestors and recognize the first fossilized remains of a bird-like organism. • Students will be able to list the adaptations that birds have evolved that allows them to fly, feed, build nests and mate. • Students will gain experience using field guides and binoculars to identify birds. • Students will gain insight into the study of ornithology, and to bird watching as a recreational pastime. • Students will be able to state the value of birds, the role they play in the natural environment, the threats to their existence, and ways in which we can all help our feathered friends. • Teachers will learn how to conduct a ‘bird activity’ that is user friendly and can be used to enrich their student’s knowledge of ‘back yard’ wildlife.
  • Belize's Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Belize's Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity

    Belize’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Reporting Period: 2009 - 2013 September, 2014 Belize’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, submitted by the Forest Department, Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and Sustainable Development, Belize We thank all those participants who took part in the review process, both in Government agencies, in regional workshops and focal group meetings across Belize. Nature ----- Culture ------ Life This report was produced under the “National Biodiversity Planning to Support the implementation of the CDB 2011 - 2020 Strategic Plan in Belize (National Biodiversity Enabling Activities)” With funding from the United Nations Development Programme – Global Environment Facility Please cite as: Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity: Belize (2014). Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and Sustainable Development, Belmopan. INTRODUCTION 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 PART 1. UPDATE ON BIODIVERSITY STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN WELLBEING 4 1. The National Importance of Biodiversity to Belize 4 2. Major changes in the status and trends of biodiversity in Belize 14 3. The Main Threats to Biodiversity in Belize 28 4. Impacts of the changes in biodiversity for ecosystem services, and the socioeconomic and cultural implications of these impacts 44 PART II: THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTION PLANS, ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND THE MAINSTREAMING OF BIODIVERSITY 47 5. Belize’s Biodiversity Targets 47 6. Status of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, incorporation of biodiversity targets and mainstreaming of biodiversity. 48 7. Actions Belize has taken to implement the Convention since the fourth report, and the outcomes of these actions.
  • Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book

    Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book

    Learn about . A Learning and Activity Book Color your own guide to the birds that wing their way across the plains, hills, forests, deserts and mountains of Texas. Text Mark W. Lockwood Conservation Biologist, Natural Resource Program Editorial Direction Georg Zappler Art Director Elena T. Ivy Educational Consultants Juliann Pool Beverly Morrell © 1997 Texas Parks and Wildlife 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 PWD BK P4000-038 10/97 All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Another "Learn about Texas" publication from TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE PRESS ISBN- 1-885696-17-5 Key to the Cover 4 8 1 2 5 9 3 6 7 14 16 10 13 20 19 15 11 12 17 18 19 21 24 23 20 22 26 28 31 25 29 27 30 ©TPWPress 1997 1 Great Kiskadee 16 Blue Jay 2 Carolina Wren 17 Pyrrhuloxia 3 Carolina Chickadee 18 Pyrrhuloxia 4 Altamira Oriole 19 Northern Cardinal 5 Black-capped Vireo 20 Ovenbird 6 Black-capped Vireo 21 Brown Thrasher 7Tufted Titmouse 22 Belted Kingfisher 8 Painted Bunting 23 Belted Kingfisher 9 Indigo Bunting 24 Scissor-tailed Flycatcher 10 Green Jay 25 Wood Thrush 11 Green Kingfisher 26 Ruddy Turnstone 12 Green Kingfisher 27 Long-billed Thrasher 13 Vermillion Flycatcher 28 Killdeer 14 Vermillion Flycatcher 29 Olive Sparrow 15 Blue Jay 30 Olive Sparrow 31 Great Horned Owl =female =male Texas Birds More kinds of birds have been found in Texas than any other state in the United States: just over 600 species.
  • Species Risk Assessment

    Species Risk Assessment

    Ecological Sustainability Analysis of the Kaibab National Forest: Species Diversity Report Ver. 1.2 Prepared by: Mikele Painter and Valerie Stein Foster Kaibab National Forest For: Kaibab National Forest Plan Revision Analysis 22 December 2008 SpeciesDiversity-Report-ver-1.2.doc 22 December 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART I: Species Diversity.............................................................................................................. 1 Species List ................................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria .................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Sources................................................................................................................ 3 Screening Results.................................................................................................................... 4 Habitat Associations and Initial Species Groups........................................................................ 8 Species associated with ecosystem diversity characteristics of terrestrial vegetation or aquatic systems ......................................................................................................................
  • (Laterallus Jamaicensis) Prepared By: Am

    (Laterallus Jamaicensis) Prepared By: Am

    Final Report to: Texas Comptroller Texas Species Research IAC # 15-5545RR Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) Photo: Black Rail at San Bernard NWR, 2017 (Credit: A. A. Moore) Prepared by: Amanda A. Moore Texas State University, San Marcos Department of Biology November 2018 Primary respondent: Dr. Floyd Weckerly Department of Biology, 601 University Drive, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666. E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: 512-245-3353 Co-respondent: Dr. M. Clay Green Department of Biology, 601 University Drive, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666. E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: 512-245-8037 Research Collaborator: James D. M. Tolliver Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iv Summary.......................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Species distribution models for the Eastern Black Rail ................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area ..............................................................................................................................
  • Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance

    Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance

    Current Status and Historical Trends of the Estuarine Living Resources within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Volume 4 of 4 Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-06D • January 1996 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Volume 4 Checklist of Species within Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance John W. Tunnell, Jr. and Sandra A. Alvarado, Editors Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 Current Status and Historical Trends of Estuarine Living Resources of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area January 1996 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Ms. Jane Saginaw Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Conservation Commission Mr.
  • California Black Rail (Laterallus Jamaicensis Coturniculus) and Virginia Rail (Rallus Limicola)

    California Black Rail (Laterallus Jamaicensis Coturniculus) and Virginia Rail (Rallus Limicola)

    Maybellene Gamboa Home Range of Black and Virginia Rails Spring 2011 Home Range of Secretive Marsh Birds: California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) and Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola) Maybellene Gamboa ABSTRACT The California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) is a rarely seen, threatened species associated with wetland systems in California. Along with the widespread Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), the California Black Rail has been recently discovered in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Previous studies have attempted to estimate the home range and to track the movements of these secretive birds, but no study has focused on the population in the Sierra Nevada foothills. To estimate the home range size of both species, we attached radiotransmitters to the bodies of captured birds during the summers of 2008-2010. Using daily fixes of radiotagged birds, I estimated home range using minimum convex polygons (MCP) and fixed kernel density (KD). I found that California Black Rails had a smaller home range (0.35 + 0.07 ha) and core area (0.08 + 0.02 ha) in the Sierra Nevada foothills than in previous studies. Virginia Rail home range (0.53 + 0.11 ha) and core area (0.12 + 0.03 ha) were consistent with previous studies. As expected, Virginia Rails were found in deeper water than Black Rails and had larger home ranges. Core areas and habitat characteristics were similar between species with both preferring low, dense vegetation. Since a decline in suitable wetland habitat has been associated with a decline in California Black Rail populations, the understanding and maintenance of the population dynamics of the California Black Rail in the Sierra Nevada foothills is vital for the conservation of this threatened species.