(Laterallus Jamaicensis) Prepared By: Am

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Laterallus Jamaicensis) Prepared By: Am Final Report to: Texas Comptroller Texas Species Research IAC # 15-5545RR Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) Photo: Black Rail at San Bernard NWR, 2017 (Credit: A. A. Moore) Prepared by: Amanda A. Moore Texas State University, San Marcos Department of Biology November 2018 Primary respondent: Dr. Floyd Weckerly Department of Biology, 601 University Drive, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666. E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: 512-245-3353 Co-respondent: Dr. M. Clay Green Department of Biology, 601 University Drive, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666. E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: 512-245-8037 Research Collaborator: James D. M. Tolliver Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iv Summary.......................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Species distribution models for the Eastern Black Rail ................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area ............................................................................................................................... 4 Species occurrence data .......................................................................................................... 5 Modeling detectability and occupancy ................................................................................... 6 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2: Radio Telemetry .......................................................................................................... 13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 13 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 14 Capture and Radio Marking ................................................................................................... 14 Radio Tracking ....................................................................................................................... 16 Statistical analyses ................................................................................................................. 17 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Home Range .......................................................................................................................... 18 Habitat Selection ................................................................................................................... 19 Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 20 Chapter 3: Habitat selection of Black Rails and Yellow Rails in the context of fire ....................... 22 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 22 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 24 Survey Methods ..................................................................................................................... 24 Vegetation Assessment ......................................................................................................... 25 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 25 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion and recommendations ................................................................................................ 31 Literature Cited .............................................................................................................................. 32 i List of Figures Figure 1. Location of 6 study sites along the Texas coast where Black Rail call-playback surveys were conducted in 2015 and 2016 ...................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Predicted probabilities of occupancy (ѱ) for Black Rails in the coastal region of Texas as described by habitat covariates. ...................................................................... 10 Figure 3. Predicted probability of occurrence for the Black Rail in coastal Texas ........... 12 Figure 4. Location of areas at San Bernard NWR, Texas, where Black Rail radio telemetry study took place (2017-18) ............................................................................................. 16 Figure 5. Elevation at 243 relocations of radio-marked Black Rails captured at San Bernard NWR, Texas, winter and spring 2017 and 2018 ............................................... 20 Figure 6. Location of burn plots at San Bernard NWR, Texas, where Black Rails and Yellow Rails were captured and banded (2017-18) ....................................................... 24 Figure 7. Number of Black Rails and Yellow Rails captured in 2017 in 6 plots at San Bernard NWR, Texas, that differed in number of years since last burned .................... 26 Figure 8. Number of Black Rails and Yellow Rails captured in 2018 in 6 plots at San Bernard NWR, Texas, that differed in number of years since last burned .................... 26 Figure 9. Overhead cover measured in burn plots at locations were Black Rails and Yellow Rails were captured in 2017 and 2018 at San Bernard NWR, Texas .................. 28 ii List of Tables Table 1. Descriptionsfrom Elliott (2014) of ecotypes used as habitat covariates in occupancy models ............................................................................................................ 8 Table 2. Candidate models explaining Black Rail occurrence in the coastal region of Texas from 2015 to 2016 .................................................................................................. 9 Table 3. Predicted probability of occurrence of Black Rails within coastal Texas study region .............................................................................................................................. 12 Table 4. Untransformed regression coefficients for the covariates potentially affecting site occupancy (ѱ) and detection probabilities (푝) of Black Rails in coastal Texas in 20115 and 2016 .............................................................................................................. 13 Table 5. Means (±SD) of home range (95%) and core use area (50% kernel) of 14 radio- marked Black Rails captured at San Bernard NWR, Texas, winter and spring 2017 and 2018 ................................................................................................................................ 19 Table 6. Ecotypes within 95% MCP home ranges of 14 radio-marked Black Rails captured at San Bernard NWR, Texas, winter and spring 2017 and 2018. ................................... 20 Table 7. Dominant plant species in burn plots where Black Rails and Yellow Rails were captured in 2017 and 2018, San Bernard NWR, Texas................................................... 27 Table 8. Candidate models examining relative abundance of Black Rails and Yellow Rails in relation to average habitat covariates in burn-plots located at San Bernard NWR, Texas, winter 2017 and 2018 ......................................................................................... 29 iii Acknowledgements Many thanks to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (especially Jennifer Wilson and Woody Woodrow), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and The Nature Conservancy biologists and refuge managers who facilitated our research. Data collection was made possible due to excellent field technicians: Tara Hohman, Christina Farrell, Jacob Rogers, Matthew Boone, Shelby Stanley, Bryan Baird, Madison Torres, Cameron Caldwell, Rebekah Rylander, Sara Durham, Joe Hohman, Heather Erickson, Joey Martinez, Matt Milholland, Bradford Westrich, Rebecca Bracken, and Ali Cappadonna. Funding for this research was provided by the Texas Comptroller and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Summary The enigmatic Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) is often regarded as the most secretive marsh bird in North America. The Eastern Black Rail (L. j. jamaicensis) may be the most endangered bird species along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America, as it is listed as endangered in six eastern states and is proposed
Recommended publications
  • (FNP) Bonny Island, Rivers State, Nigeria
    Biodiversity Assessment of Finima Nature Park (FNP) Bonny Island, Rivers State, Nigeria October, 2019 Finima Nature Park Biodiversity Assessment 2019 Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Wildlife and Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.0 Methods Employed in this FNP Mammal Study ..................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Highlights of the Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 17 4.0 Towards Remediation of the Problems that Mammals and other Wildlife now Face or May Face in the Future, in the FNP and Environs ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan
    University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland Institut of Zoology Ecology of the Black Catbird, Melanoptila glabrirostris, at Shipstern Nature Reserve (Belize), and distribution in Yucatan. J.Laesser Annick Morgenthaler May 2003 Master thesis supervised by Prof. Claude Mermod and Dr. Louis-Félix Bersier CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Aim and description of the study 2. Geographic setting 2.1. Yucatan peninsula 2.2. Belize 2.3. Shipstern Nature Reserve 2.3.1. History and previous studies 2.3.2. Climate 2.3.3. Geology and soils 2.3.4. Vegetation 2.3.5. Fauna 3. The Black Catbird 3.1. Taxonomy 3.2. Description 3.3. Breeding 3.4. Ecology and biology 3.5. Distribution and threats 3.6. Current protection measures FIRST PART: BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND DENSITY AT SHIPSTERN 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Census 4.1.1. Territory mapping 4.1.2. Transect point-count 4.2. Sizing and ringing 4.3. Nest survey (from hide) 5. Results 5.1. Biology 5.1.1. Morphometry 5.1.2. Nesting 5.1.3. Diet 5.1.4. Competition and predation 5.2. Habitat use and population density 5.2.1. Population density 5.2.2. Habitat use 5.2.3. Banded individuals monitoring 5.2.4. Distribution through the Reserve 6. Discussion 6.1. Biology 6.2. Habitat use and population density SECOND PART: DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE RANGE 7. Materials and methods 7.1. Data collection 7.2. Visit to others sites 8. Results 8.1. Data compilation 8.2. Visited places 8.2.1. Corozalito (south of Shipstern lagoon) 8.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRD CONSERVATION the Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW
    BIRD CONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2012 BIRD’S EYE VIEW Is Species Conservation Enough? How should we as conservationists decide which birds deserve protection? Where should we draw the line that tells us which groups of birds are “unique” enough to merit saving? t one extreme, a conserva- becomes extinct? Do we care about tion skeptic might insist that the continuation of these evolution- Apreserving one type of bird ary processes, or do we take a pass from each genus is sufficient. At the on preserving them because these other, passionate lovers of wildlife birds are not sufficiently “unique”? may not accept the loss of even one When in doubt about whether to individual. A more typical birder take conservation action, I fall back might nominate the species as the on the precautionary principle, key conservation level because the which says, in essence, that when concept of species is familiar to us. l American Dipper: USFWS uncertain about the potential harm- Science gets us closer to the answers, ful effect of an action, the prudent but it cannot draw the line: the purpose of science is course is the conservative one. or, as aldo Leopold to gather knowledge, not to make decisions for us. wrote, “Save all of the pieces.” Furthermore, like life itself, the science of taxonomy is I say, save the Black Hills Dipper regardless of which in a constant state of change. Baltimore and Bullock’s taxonomic opinion prevails; and while we are at it, we Orioles have been “lumped” into Northern Oriole and ought to save Wayne’s Warbler, the rhododendron- then “split” again, all based on the most current scien- dwelling Swainson’s Warbler, and the tree-nesting tific opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Plastics and Waterbirds: Incidence and Impacts
    AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF Doc. AEWA/MOP 7.28 AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS Agenda item: 20 Original: English 06 September 2018 7th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES 04-08 December 2018, Durban, South Africa “Beyond 2020: Shaping flyway conservation for the future” PLASTICS AND WATERBIRDS: INCIDENCE AND IMPACTS (Compiled by Peter Ryan, FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, South Africa, on behalf of RSPB) Background Through Resolution 6.9, the Meeting of the Parties recognised the potential impacts to migratory seabirds resulting from the ingestion of plastics, microplastics and other forms of marine litter (marine debris), recalled the CMS Resolutions 10.4 and 11.30 on marine debris, requiring Parties to work collectively and with the relevant Regional Seas Conventions on reducing the impacts of marine debris on migratory species and requested the Technical Committee, subject to the availability of financial and in-kind resources, in consultation with CMS, to assess any threats posed to migratory seabirds listed by AEWA from the ingestion of plastics, of microplastics and other forms of marine litter (marine debris) and to provide advice on appropriate responses in this regard to the Meeting of Parties. This task had required outsourcing and thanks to the generous funding provided by the Government of the Netherlands, the production of a review to assess the threats of plastics and microplastics to AEWA seabird populations was commissioned to RSPB and the BirdLife International Global Seabirds Programme, albeit late in the triennium. It was reviewed by the Technical and Standing Committees and approved for submission to MOP7 in August 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Raccoon Island Phase B 2009 Final EA FONSI
    PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures are proposed to reduce or eliminate environmental risks associated with the proposed action (herein referred to as the “Project”). Mitigation measures in the form of terms and conditions are added to the negotiated agreement and are shall be considered enforceable as part of the agreement. Application of terms and conditions will be individually considered by the Director or Associate Director of the MMS. Minor modifications to the proposed mitigation measures may be made during the noncompetitive negotiated leasing process if comments indicate changes are necessary or if conditions warrant. Plans and Performance Requirements The NRCS will provide the MMS with a copy of the Project’s “Construction Solicitation and Specifications Plan” (herein referred to as the “Plan”). No activity or operation, authorized by the negotiated agreement (herein referred to as the Memorandum of Agreement or MOA), at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be carried out until the MMS has determined that each activity or operation described in the Plan will be conducted in a manner that is in compliance with the provisions and requirements of the MOA. The preferred method of conveying sediment from the Raccoon Island Borrow Area involves the use of a hydraulic cutterhead dredge and scows. Any modifications to the Plan that may affect the project area, including the use of submerged or floated pipelines to convey sediment, must be approved by the MMS prior to implementation of the modification. The NRCS will ensure that all operations at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be conducted in accordance with the final approved Plan and all terms and conditions in this MOA, as well as all applicable regulations, orders, guidelines, and directives specified or referenced herein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rufous-Faced Crake (Laterallus Xenopterus) and Its Paraguayan Congeners
    THE WILSON BULLETIN A QUARTERLYMAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 93, No. 2 JUNE 1981 PAGES 137-300 Wilson Bull., 93(2), 1981, pp. 137-144 THE RUFOUS-FACED CRAKE (LATERALLUS XENOPTERUS) AND ITS PARAGUAYAN CONGENERS ROBERT W. STORER The Black Rail (Laterullus jamaicensis) and other crakes of the genus Luterallus are among the least known American birds, and Ripley (1977:192) points out that “of all the rail family, this group of species collectively is the least studied.” This is not surprising because they are secretive birds living in dense grassy places. But one relatively tame species, the Galapagos Rail (L. spilonotus) has been well studied in the field (Franklin et al. 1979). A second species, the Red-and-White Crake (L. leucopyrrhus) is commonly kept in aviaries where some of its habits have been reported (Meise 1934, Everitt 1962, Levi 1966). Museum spec- imens of Luterullus are few, hence their distribution and status are poorly known; anatomical material is even scarcer. The least known species of the group, the Rufous-faced Crake (L. xen- opterus), was first taken in Paraguay in 1933 and described the following year (Conover 1934). It was not found again until Philip Myers rediscov- ered it in 1976 and Rick Hansen in 1978 (Myers and Hansen 1980). The species has not been illustrated previously, probably because the tail was missing from the type specimen and information on the color of the soft parts was not available. In 1979, I spent 5 weeks in Paraguay with a field party from the Uni- versity of Michigan Museum of Zoology led by Philip Myers, III.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Wet Land Bird Species in Lake Hora-Arsedi, Bishoftu, Ethiopia
    Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 38(5): 1-12, 2019; Article no.CJAST.51516 ISSN: 2457-1024 (Past name: British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, Past ISSN: 2231-0843, NLM ID: 101664541) Diversity and Abundance of Wet Land Bird Species in Lake Hora-Arsedi, Bishoftu, Ethiopia Askale Girma1 and Mesele Admassu2* 1Department of Biology, Adulala Preparatory School, Ethiopia. 2Department of Biology, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Author AG collected the data and makes the analysis. Author MA prepared the manuscript for publication. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/CJAST/2019/v38i530381 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Maduike Chiehiura Onwubiko Ezeibe, Professor, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria. Reviewers: (1) Dishi Khobe, Adamawa State University, Nigeria. (2) Sitaram Taigor, Jiwaji University, India. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/51516 Received 08 August 2019 Accepted 11 October 2019 Original Research Article Published 14 November 2019 ABSTRACT The investigation of species diversity and abundance of birds in Lake Hora Arsedi Bishoftu town was conducted from September 2018 to July 2019. The aim of the study was to assess the diversity and abundance of bird species in Lake Hora Arsedi at Bishoftu town. Point count method was used to investigate the abundance of birds. Observation was conducted periodically walking along the study area early in the morning and late in the afternoon. Different diversity indices and statistical methods (Chi-square test and correlation) were used to analyze data collected during the field survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Ornithology
    New Jersey School of Conservation One Wapalanne Road Branchville, NJ 07826-5116 800-624-7780 (dial option 3) or 973-948-4646 Fax: 973-948-5131 [email protected] http://www.csam.montclair.edu/njsoc/ Introduction to Ornithology DESCRIPTION: This session is designed to give students an appreciation of the important role birds play in our ecosystem. The students will have the opportunity to see and identify live birds at our feeders as well as simulated wooden birds placed along a trail. This trail is designed to give students practice locating and identifying common species of birds. The twelve stations that are part of the trail highlight a variety of birds and habitats. The trail is “teacher friendly” in that the accompanying teacher’s manual provides photographs and information about each bird along the trail. OBJECTIVES: • Students will be able to track the evolution of birds from their reptilian ancestors and recognize the first fossilized remains of a bird-like organism. • Students will be able to list the adaptations that birds have evolved that allows them to fly, feed, build nests and mate. • Students will gain experience using field guides and binoculars to identify birds. • Students will gain insight into the study of ornithology, and to bird watching as a recreational pastime. • Students will be able to state the value of birds, the role they play in the natural environment, the threats to their existence, and ways in which we can all help our feathered friends. • Teachers will learn how to conduct a ‘bird activity’ that is user friendly and can be used to enrich their student’s knowledge of ‘back yard’ wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Is the Bird Population in the Hadejia-Nguru.Cdr
    Is the Bird Population in the Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands under Threat? A. S. Ringim1* and H. Jr. Harry2 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University Dutse, P. M. B. 7156, Dutse, Jigawa State, Nigeria 2. Nigerian Conservation Foundation/Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands Conservation Project, Nguru, Yobe State, Nigeria. *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] Abstract Anthropogenic disturbances have been found to be one of the key drivers of changes in bird populations as observed with dramatic consequences among the bird assemblages of Hadejia-Nguru Ramsar Wetland and elsewhere globally. We assessed the effects of farming, fishing, and grazing on bird species richness and density in Protected Areas (PAs) and Unprotected Areas (UPAs) of the Hadejia- Nguru Wetlands. Anthropogenic activities (grazing, fishing, and farming) at four different disturbance scales based on the level of anthropogenic activities: No, Low, Moderate and Intense were observed, assessed and recorded in PAs and UPAs of the Wetland. Results showed that farming, fishing and grazing had more negative influence on bird species richness, compared to bird densities and the species richness decreased significantly as intensity of these activities became more intensive (p < 0.001). The results also indicated that fishing had more negative influences on bird species richness than farming and grazing. This could lead to reduction of bird density in both areas if not checked. Management of both areas should ensure the long-term conservation of resident, intra-African and Palearctic migratory birds in the Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands. It is also recommended that anthropogenic activities within the wetland should be minimized in order to conserve the bird community and other wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Belize's Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    Belize’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Reporting Period: 2009 - 2013 September, 2014 Belize’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, submitted by the Forest Department, Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and Sustainable Development, Belize We thank all those participants who took part in the review process, both in Government agencies, in regional workshops and focal group meetings across Belize. Nature ----- Culture ------ Life This report was produced under the “National Biodiversity Planning to Support the implementation of the CDB 2011 - 2020 Strategic Plan in Belize (National Biodiversity Enabling Activities)” With funding from the United Nations Development Programme – Global Environment Facility Please cite as: Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity: Belize (2014). Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and Sustainable Development, Belmopan. INTRODUCTION 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 PART 1. UPDATE ON BIODIVERSITY STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN WELLBEING 4 1. The National Importance of Biodiversity to Belize 4 2. Major changes in the status and trends of biodiversity in Belize 14 3. The Main Threats to Biodiversity in Belize 28 4. Impacts of the changes in biodiversity for ecosystem services, and the socioeconomic and cultural implications of these impacts 44 PART II: THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTION PLANS, ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND THE MAINSTREAMING OF BIODIVERSITY 47 5. Belize’s Biodiversity Targets 47 6. Status of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, incorporation of biodiversity targets and mainstreaming of biodiversity. 48 7. Actions Belize has taken to implement the Convention since the fourth report, and the outcomes of these actions.
    [Show full text]