DOCSLIB.ORG

CZCAA-IFR-Study-00019-01.00-Released-D1-Feasibility-Assessment-Signed.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CZCAA-IFR-Study-00019-01.00-Released-D1-Feasibility-Assessment-Signed.Pdf General Feasibility Assessment / CZCAA IFR Study Change History Version Status Date Affected Author Cause and Summary of the Change Pages 00.01 Draft 2017-01-27 All N. Alsina First draft 00.02 Draft 2017-01-30 All N. Alsina Internally reviewed first draft 01.00 Draft 2017-02-01 All N. Alsina Final version 01.00 Released 2017-03-30 All N. Alsina Released version Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2 FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT TASKS ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION OF CZECH AERODROMES ..................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Czech airspace classification ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Mnichovo Hradiště Airport (LKMH-CR) .................................................................................................. 10 2.1.3 Hradec Králové Airport (LKHK-CR) ........................................................................................................ 12 2.1.4 České Budějovice Airport (LKCS-CR).................................................................................................... 14 2.2 BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCES ................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Békéscsaba Repülőtér Airport (LHBC-HU) ............................................................................................ 16 2.2.2 Stord Sørstokken Airport (ENSO-NO) .................................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Vardø Svartnes Airport (ENSS-NO) ....................................................................................................... 19 2.2.4 Vila Real Airport (LPVR-PO) .................................................................................................................. 21 2.2.5 Straubing Wallmühle Airport (EDMS-DE) .............................................................................................. 23 2.2.6 Allendorf Eder Airport (EDFQ-DE) ......................................................................................................... 25 2.2.7 Brighton City/Shoreham Airport (EGKA-UK) .......................................................................................... 26 2.2.8 Teruel Airport (LETL-ES) ....................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.9 European CAAs experiences: IFR operations in uncontrolled aerodromes .......................................... 32 2.2.9.1 Germany .............................................................................................................................................................. 32 2.2.9.2 United Kingdom ................................................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.9.3 Spain ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.3 IFR PROCEDURES POSSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................. 35 2.4 INTERACTION WITH THE CZCAA TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA .............................................................................. 38 2.5 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 38 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................... 39 4 REFERENCES – CZCAA IFR STUDY REGULATORY BASIS ................................................................. 41 4.1 GENERAL FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT REFERENCES ....................................................................................... 42 4.2 LOCAL LEVEL .............................................................................................................................................. 42 4.3 INTERNATIONAL LEVEL ................................................................................................................................ 43 4.3.1 EU Legislation ........................................................................................................................................ 43 4.3.2 EASA Documents ................................................................................................................................... 44 4.3.3 ICAO Documents ................................................................................................................................... 44 4.3.4 EUROCONTROL Documents ................................................................................................................ 45 4.4 IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC IFR REGULATIVE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................... 45 4.4.1 IFR regulative requirements identified in the EU legislation in force ..................................................... 45 4.4.2 IFR regulative requirements identified in [R21] ...................................................................................... 46 4.4.3 IFR regulative requirements identified in [R30] and [R31] ..................................................................... 46 ANNEX A: AERODROME CHARTS ............................................................................................................... 47 MNICHOVO HRADIŠTĚ AIRPORT (LKMH-CR) ....................................................................................................... 47 HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ AIRPORT (LKHK-CR) ............................................................................................................. 48 ČESKÉ BUDĚJOVICE AIRPORT (LKCS-CR) .......................................................................................................... 49 BÉKÉSCSABA REPÜLŐTÉR AIRPORT (LHBC-HU) ................................................................................................. 50 DocID: CZCAA IFR study 00019 Version: 01.00 Status: released Page: 2/58 General Feasibility Assessment / CZCAA IFR Study STORD SØRSTOKKEN AIRPORT (ENSO-NO) ....................................................................................................... 51 VARDØ SVARTNES AIRPORT (ENSS-NO) ............................................................................................................ 52 VILA REAL AIRPORT (LPVR-PO) ......................................................................................................................... 53 STRAUBING WALLMÜHLE AIRPORT (EDMS-DE) ................................................................................................... 54 ALLENDORF EDER AIRPORT (EDFQ-DE) ............................................................................................................. 55 BRIGHTON CITY/SHOREHAM AIRPORT (EGKA-UK) .............................................................................................. 56 TERUEL AIRPORT (LETL-ES) .............................................................................................................................. 57 ANNEX B: CZCAA IFR STUDY IFR REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 58 DocID: CZCAA IFR study 00019 Version: 01.00 Status: released Page: 3/58 General Feasibility Assessment / CZCAA IFR Study Contents of Figures Figure 1 Feasibility Assessment tasks ............................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 Overview of airspace classification ...................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3 FIC airspace segmentation .................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 4 LKMH facilities chart close-up ............................................................................................................ 10 Figure 5 LKMH aerial view ............................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 6 LKHK facilities chart close-up ............................................................................................................ 12 Figure 7 LKHK aerial view ................................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 8 LKCS facilities chart close-up ............................................................................................................ 14 Figure 9 LKCS aerial view ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 10 LHBC facilities chart close-up .......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 11 LHBC aerial view .............................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 12 LHBC NDB approach for RWY35 ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Airports
    Number 2, Volume XIII, July 2018 REGIONAL AIRPORTS Lenka Kontriková1 Summary: The consequence of social and economic changes in the Czech Republic was the liberalization of air transport. After the politically bipolar Europe ceased to exist and the Czech Republic joined NATO, there was no need to keep so many military airports, which were therefore converted into civilian airports. After some time and especially recently, it is thought that the airports should be deemed as an integral part of the public transport infrastructure. Key words: Air transport, regional airport, regional develepment, new line INTRODUCTION Historically, air transport is the newest type of transport. However, in recent decades it is the most dynamically developing means of transport in both passenger and freight transportation. Current demand for air transport is mainly caused by geopolitical, social and economic changes related to the globalization process. 1. REGIONAL AIRPORT FORMATION Česká správa letišť, s. p. One of the first steps in air transport after 1990 was transfer of airports administration from Československé aerolinie to newly established Česká správa letišť and Slovenská správa letísk. Activities of Česká správa letišť were ceased as of 1 July 2004. Airports Brno – Tuřany, Ostrava – Mošnov and Karlovy Vary – Olšová Vrata were transferred to the ownership of the regions. After the ownership transfer of Brno – Tuřany and Ostrava – Mošnov these were transformed to joint-stock companies and Karlovy Vary – Olšová Vrata to limited liability company. (1) The only airport which remained owned by the Czech Republic (Ministry of Finance), resp. joint-stock company Prague Airport is Praha – Ruzyně. Administration of all other airports is in hands of their owners as the state only plays the role of a regulator, legislator and ensures supervision of state power in civilian air transport.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Wisconsin State Airport System Plan
    Appendix E Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronyms and Abbreviations AAGR Average Annual Growth Rate AC Advisory Circular ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program ADG Airplane Design Group AIP Airport Improvement Program ALP Airport Layout Plan ALSF Approach Lighting System with Sequenced Flashing Lights APV Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance ARC Airport Reference Code ASOS Automated Surface Observing System ATCT Air Traffic Control Tower AWOS Automate Weather Observing System BCPL Board of Commissioners of Public Lands BOA Bureau of Aeronautics CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulation CIP Capital Improvement Plan CO Carbon Monoxide CRJ Canadian Regional Jet CS Commercial Service CY Calendar Year DNL Day-Night Average Sound Level DNR Department of Natural Resources EA Environmental Assessment EAS Essential Air Service EMB Embraer EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERJ Embraer Regional Jet FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulations FBO Fixed Based Operator FOD Foreign Object Debris FPPA Farmland Protection Policy Act FSA Facility and Service Objective FY Fiscal Year GA General Aviation GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office Wisconsin State Airport System Plan 2030 E-1 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Continued) GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Informational System GPS Global Positioning System GRP Gross Regional Product HIRL High Intensity Runway Lights HLZO Height Limitation Zoning Ordinance ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization
    [Show full text]
  • České Vysoké Učení Technické V Praze Fakulta Dopravní
    ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE FAKULTA DOPRAVNÍ Tereza Míková SYSTÉM LETIŠŤ PRO OBSLUHU PRAHY A REGIONU ČECHY Diplomová práce 2018 Poděkování Za odborné vedení a cenné rady v průběhu celé práce bych ráda poděkovala svému vedoucímu doc. Ing. Peteru Vittekovi, Ph.D. Ráda bych také poděkovala svému partnerovi, rodině a přátelům za podporu během studia i psaní této práce. Prohlášení Předkládám tímto k posouzení a obhajobě diplomovou práci, zpracovanou na závěr studia na ČVUT v Praze Fakultě dopravní. Nemám závažný důvod proti užívání tohoto školního díla ve smyslu § 60 Zákona č. 121/2000 Sb., o právu autorském, o právech souvisejících s právem autorským a o změně některých zákonů (autorský zákon). Prohlašuji, že jsem předloženou práci vypracovala samostatně a že jsem uvedla veškeré použité informační zdroje v souladu s Metodickým pokynem o dodržování etických principů při přípravě vysokoškolských závěrečných prací. V Praze dne 28. května 2018 ............................................. podpis 1 Abstrakt Diplomová práce Systém letišť pro obsluhu Prahy a regionu Čechy se zabývá možností vytvoření synergického systému dvou letišť v oblasti Čech. Principem je provozování dvou letišť, letiště Václava Havla Praha a hledaného druhého letiště, v této oblasti stejnou společností. Práce uvádí výhody, které by toto řešení přineslo, analyzuje již existující synergické systémy letišť v Evropě a zkoumá, které z existujících letišť v Čechách by bylo možné do synergického systému zapojit. Klíčová slova Synergický systém letišť, Rozvoj letišť, Provozovatel letiště, Konkurence letišť, Letiště Praha Ruzyně, Letiště Pardubice Abstract This diploma thesis, Airport Systems for Prague and Bohemian Region, covers possible establishment of synergetic two airport system in Bohemian region. Two airports, Prague Vaclav Havel and the sought second airport, would be operated by the same company.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List Safety Approach Light Masts
    REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 1 (10) AFRICA Angola Menongue Airport 2013 Benin Cotonou Airport 2000 Burkina Faso Bobo Diaulasso Airport 1999 Cameroon Douala Airport 1994, 2009 Garoua Airport 2001 Cap Verde Praia Airport 1999 Amilcar Capral Airport 2008 Equatorial Guinea Mongomeyen Airport 2010 Gabon Libreville Airport 1994 M’vengue Airport 2003 Ghana Takoradi Airport 2008 Accra Kotoka 2013 Guinea-Bissau Bissau Airport 2012 Ivory Coast Abidjan Airport 2002 Yamoussoukro Airport 2006 Kenya Laikipia Air Base 2010 Kisumu Airport 2011 Libya Tripoli Airport 2002 Benghazi Airport 2005 Madagasgar Antananarivo Airport 1994 Mahajanga Airport 2009 Mali Moptu Airport 2002 Bamako Airport 2004, 2010 Mauritius Rodrigues Airport 2002 SSR Int’l Airport 2011 Mauritius SSR 2012 Mozambique Airport in Mozambique 2008 Namibia Walvis Bay Airport 2005 Lüderitz Airport 2005 Republic of Congo Ollombo Airport 2007 Pointe Noire Airport 2007 Exel Composites Plc www.exelcomposites.com Muovilaaksontie 2 Tel. +358 20 754 1200 FI-82110 Heinävaara, Finland Fax +358 20 754 1330 This information is confidential unless otherwise stated REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 2 (10) Brazzaville Airport 2008, 2010, 2013 Rwanda Kigali-Kamombe International Airport 2004 South Africa Kruger Mpumalanga Airport 2002 King Shaka Airport, Durban 2009 Lanseria Int’l Airport 2013 St. Helena Airport 2013 Sudan Merowe Airport 2007 Tansania Dar Es Salaam Airport 2009 Tunisia Tunis–Carthage International Airport 2011 ASIA China
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    AIR ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION INSTITUTE Beranových 130 199 01 PRAGUE 99 No. CZ -13 - 459 FINAL REPORT Investigation into the Serious Incident of aircraft type Boeing B737-800, registration mark OK-TVG, at LKPD aerodrome on 25th August 2013 Prague March 2014 This investigation has been carried out in accordance with the Regulation EU No 996/2010, Act No 49/1997 Coll., on civil aviation and Annex 13 to the ICAO Convention on International Civil Aviation. The sole objective of the investigation of an accident or incident under these Regulations shall be the prevention of accidents and incidents. It shall not be the purpose of such an investigation to apportion blame or liability. The Final Report, findings and conclusions therein concerning air accidents and incidents, and possibly systemic shortcomings endangering operational safety, are only of an informative nature and cannot be used otherwise than as a recommendation for the implementation of measures in order to prevent further air accidents and incidents with similar causes. The creator of the Final Report explicitly states that the Final Report cannot be used to determine blame or responsibility in connection with determining the causes of an air accident or incident and cannot be used for enforcing claims in the event of an insurance claim. Abbreviations used AACU Antiskid/Autobrake Control Unit ATC Air Trafic Control ATCo Air Trafic Controller ATS Air Trafic Service ATPL(A) Airline Transport Pilot Licence ATIS Automatic Terminal Information Service IAS Indicated Airspeed CWY Clearway
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Breeze (36)
    Asian Breeze (36) （亜細亜の風） 14 October, 2014 Happy Autumn to you Dear Coordinators and Facilitators in the Asia/Pacific region. Having received the initial submission for S15 from airlines, you must be getting busy in allocating slots and facilitating schedule toward the end of this month of SAL. Cool and beautiful Autumn season has arrived in Japan with all the trees turning to yellow or red. This is the best season in the year for everything like touring, sporting, eating and studying. Allocating the slots at the airport, we are also allocating the time to trip to appreciate the color changes of trees and mountains. For this issue, we have received a wonderful contribution from Mr. Michal Simacek featuring the slot coordination in Czech Republic where the next SC135 will be held in November. In addition, some tips as to where you should visit in Prague are featured. Please plan a head to include those nice tourist spots in your trip. We hope you will enjoy reading them. Slot Coordination Czech Republic Václav Havel Airport Prague has the status of a coordinated airport (Level 3). Therefore for all flights and whatever their changes (except emergency landing, flights connected with saving human life, search and rescue flights) the slots for arrival and departure shall be requested from the airport coordinators before execution of the flight. Slot Coordination Czech Republic is the body responsible for the allocation of airport slots at Václav Havel Airport Prague. Slot Coordination in Prague was established on 1 January 2003 as the Professional Association of Legal Entities.
    [Show full text]
  • State Action Plan on CO2 Emissions Reduction
    State Action Plan on CO2 Emissions Reduction - Czech Republic - Ministry of Transport June 2021 Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Department Nábřeží Ludvíka Svobody 12/1222 110 15 Prague 1 Czech Republic Action Plan Focal Point Mr. Vladislav Vanicek +420 225 131 609 [email protected] CONTENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 CURRENT STATE OF AVIATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC ..................................................... 6 Geographic and Demographic Structure of the Czech Republic .................................................... 6 Structure of the Aviation Sector in the Czech Republic.................................................................. 7 Air Transport Infrastructure in the Czech Republic ...................................................................... 10 Prague Airport and Other Major Airports in the Czech Republic ................................................. 11 Aircraft Fleet in the Czech Republic - Civil Aircraft Register ......................................................... 12 General Transport Data ................................................................................................................ 14 SECTION 1: ECAC/EU COMMON SECTION ........................................................................ 15 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 15 A. ECAC Baseline Scenario and estimated
    [Show full text]
  • Analýza Regionálních Letišť V České Republice 25.4.2012
    Analýza regionálních letišť v České republice Monika Jurigová Bakalářská práce 20 12 ABSTRAKT Tato bakalá řská práce se zabývá analýzou regionáln ě významných letiš ť (mimo Prahu). Teoretická část představuje základní pojmy v oblasti letecké dopravy, uvádí legislativní aspekty tématu. Část praktická nabízí náhled do historie i sou časnosti českých regionáln ě významných letiš ť a analyzuje jejich možnosti rozvoje. Rovn ěž obsahuje návrh projektu na podporu rozvoje letišt ě České Bud ějovice. Klí čová slova: regionální letišt ě, letišt ě Brno – Tu řany, letišt ě Ostrava – Mošnov, letišt ě Karlovy Vary, letišt ě Pardubice, letišt ě České Bud ějovice, historie a rozvoj letiš ť. ABSTRACT This thesis deals with the analysis of regionally significant airports (without Prague). The theoretical part presents basic concepts in the sphere of air transport, provides the legislative aspects of the topic. The practical part offers insight into the history and the present Czech regionally significant airports and analyzes their development opportunities. It includes also a proposal to support airport development České Bud ějovice. Keywords: regional airports, Brno – Tu řany Airport, Ostrava – Mošnov Airport, Karlovy Vary Airport, Pardubice Airport , České Bud ějovice Airport, history and development of airports. Ráda bych pod ěkovala vedoucímu bakalá řské práce RNDr. Old řichu Hájkovi, Ph.D., za odborné vedení a pomoc p ři zpracování. Dále bych ráda pod ěkovala svému synovi a manželovi, kte ří m ě po celou dobu studia podporovali. OBSAH ÚVOD ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download, Display, Print, Reproduce and Distribute This Material in Unaltered Form (Retaining This Notice)
    ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report – AR-2008-018(1) Final Runway excursions Part 1: A worldwide review of commercial jet aircraft runway excursions ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report AR-2008-018(1) Final Runway excursions Part 1 A worldwide review of commercial jet aircraft runway excursions - i - Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 62 Northbourne Ave, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: 1800 020 616; from overseas + 61 2 6257 4150 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117; from overseas + 61 2 6247 3117 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2009. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN and formal report title: see ‘Document retrieval information’ on page v.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2019 $10.00
    FEBRUARY 2019 $10.00 www.bcadigital.com ALSO IN THIS ISSUE The Importance of Seeing Things Clearly Business & Commercial Aviation Operating in Argentina Aircraft Leather 101 O2 Mask Failures Paranoid Pilots Club PILOT REPORT G2 Vision Jet Cirrus makes it fy higher, farther and quieter Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Tango 22, Tango 22
    1/2020 Tango 22, Tango 22 – this is TANGO 21, OVER Tactical training of Czech soldiers in Afghanistan continues even in time of their deployment in a foreign operation The military will receive eight UH-1Y Venom multipurpose helicopters and four AH-1Z Viper attack helicopters New helicopters in 2023 Both new helicopters are part of the H-1 series. Their advantage is in the mutual conformity of up to 85% of identical components, so from the service point of view it is an ideal solution. The UH-1Y Venom and the AH-1Z Viper form the backbone of the US Marine Corps helicopter fleet. These are modern, proven aircraft. The Czech Republic will acquire them for 14.6 billion crowns by 2023, on the basis of an intergovernmental agreement with the USA. The price for helicopters is in the amount of UH-1Y Venom guns, calibre 7.62 mm, and GAU16/A, calibre 14.6 billion CZK without VAT and agrees with The UH-1Y can operate in the most demanding 12.7 mm, or with 7.62 mm GAU17/A rotary how much the US Army would pay for them. climatic conditions, from arctic cold to desert machine guns. It can very effectively eliminate Not only the helicopters by themselves are heat. In the front of the cockpit sits two pilots, ground targets even with unguided air-to- included in the price, but also equipment and side by side. At the rear of the cab, there is surface missiles Hydra 70, or missiles with ammunition, spare parts, training simulator space for transporting passengers or materiel.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Airports Influence Economic Development of the Region
    MATEC Web of Conferences 236, 00(2018)20 4 https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf /201823602004 LOGI 2018 Regional Airports Influence Economic Development of the Region Václav Cempírek1, and Iveta Dočkalíková2 1College of Logistics, Department of Logistics, Palackého 1381/25, CZ 750 02 Přerov, Czech Republic; Email: [email protected] 2College of Logistics, Department of Logistics, Palackého 1381/25, CZ 750 02 Přerov, Czech Republic; Email: [email protected] Abstract: The paper deals with the importance of regional airport for economic development of the particular region with the possibility to cover also freight transport. In technical terms it is called the logistics centre or Freight Village. The special emphasis is given to the Pardubice airport and to creation of logistics centre on the Elbe river. The logistics centre would link four types of transport – railway, road, air and inland water transport. Terminal of the combined transport, which lacks in long term in the region, is also a part of the logistics centre. 1 Introduction Logistics centres are called multi modal if the access of at least two types of transport is ensured. Multi modal logistics centre means the inter-modal hub of trans-European transport network, where the goods is transhipped between different types of transport. Information and communication technologies help to control and regulate logistics processes and related activities. Such nodes are functional or possible places of business offering wide range of services related to transport. Some nodes are also able to ensure so called City Logistics. The most suitable places for nodes development are the places where the freight flows are centralized, or the places of significant intersections of transport routes, where the stream of goods changes its direction.
    [Show full text]