Contact Mechanics in Gears a Computer-Aided Approach for Analyzing Contacts in Spur and Helical Gears Master’S Thesis in Product Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Two Contact Mechanics in Gears A Computer-Aided Approach for Analyzing Contacts in Spur and Helical Gears Master’s Thesis in Product Development MARCUS SLOGÉN Department of Product and Production Development Division of Product Development CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden, 2013 MASTER’S THESIS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Contact Mechanics in Gears A Computer-Aided Approach for Analyzing Contacts in Spur and Helical Gears Marcus Slogén Department of Product and Production Development Division of Product Development CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2013 Contact Mechanics in Gear A Computer-Aided Approach for Analyzing Contacts in Spur and Helical Gears MARCUS SLOGÉN © MARCUS SLOGÉN 2013 Department of Product and Production Development Division of Product Development Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone: + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: The picture on the cover page shows the contact stress distribution over a crowned spur gear tooth. Department of Product and Production Development Göteborg, Sweden 2013 Contact Mechanics in Gears A Computer-Aided Approach for Analyzing Contacts in Spur and Helical Gears Master’s Thesis in Product Development MARCUS SLOGÉN Department of Product and Production Development Division of Product Development Chalmers University of Technology ABSTRACT Computer Aided Engineering, CAE, is becoming more and more vital in today's product development. By using reliable and efficient computer based tools it is possible to replace initial physical testing. This will result in cost savings, but it will also reduce the development time and material waste, since the demand of physical prototypes decreases. This thesis shows how a computer program for analyzing contact mechanics in spur and helical gears has been developed at the request of Vicura AB. The stakeholder has addressed a desire of acquiring more knowledge of contact mechanics and thereby also a request of obtaining a reliable computer based procedure for analyzing this phenomenon. A mechanical standard and a computational program have been used in order to evaluate the performance of the computer program that has been developed. The results indicate that the computer program behaves correctly, but also requires further evaluation with help of physical testing in order to completely verify the reliability of the program. In addition to the development of a computer program, the focus of the thesis has also been to investigate how gears can be designed in order to improve the contact durability. A study on how the micro geometry of a gear tooth influences the contact durability has therefore been carried out. The developed computer program has been used as an analytical tool for this study. The results from the analysis show that contact stresses in gears may be reduced by performing modifications in the lead and profile directions of a gear tooth. Key words: Computer Aided Engineering, contact mechanics, spur and helical gears Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Peter Hall for mentoring and constant support during the work with the thesis. I would also like to thank the rest of the staff at Vicura AB for encouragement and for having contributed with their knowledge within the field of mechanical engineering. I am also very grateful for the help that Sandeep Vijayakar at ANSOL has contributed with in order to solve different issues with the FE program. Finally, I would like to thank Göran Brännare for taken on the role as examiner for the project. Marcus Slogén, Trollhättan 12/6-2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Problem Statement ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope and Limitations ................................................................................................ 2 2. Theory Chapter 3 2.1 Gear Design ............................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Spur Gear ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Helical Gear ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Micro Geometry ................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Contact Failures ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Contact Fatigue .................................................................................................. 8 2.2.2 Wear ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.3 Plastic Deformation of the Tooth Surface ....................................................... 11 2.3 Methods used for Predicting Contact Failures ......................................................... 11 2.3.1 Contact Stress .................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 Lubrication ...................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Practical Testing .............................................................................................. 18 2.3.4 Analyzing Contact Mechanics with Computer-Aided Tools ........................... 21 3. Method 23 3.1 Layout of the Study .................................................................................................. 23 3.2 AGMA Procedure for Calculating Contact Stresses in Gears .................................. 23 3.2.1 Deviations and Assumptions ........................................................................... 26 3.3 Computational Method ............................................................................................ 26 3.3.1 The FE Software .............................................................................................. 26 3.3.2 Generation of a Generalized Model ................................................................. 27 3.4 Validation ................................................................................................................. 31 3.4.1 The Studied Object .......................................................................................... 31 3.4.2 Simulation Settings .......................................................................................... 33 3.4.3 Setup of Cases ................................................................................................. 33 3.5 The Contact Program ............................................................................................... 33 3.5.1 Program Structure ............................................................................................ 34 3.5.2 The GUI ........................................................................................................... 34 3.5.3 Communication with the FE Program ............................................................. 34 3.5.4 Options for Defining the Micro Geometry ...................................................... 35 3.5.5 Estimation of Contact Stresses ........................................................................ 37 I 3.5.6 Option for Axial Misalignments ...................................................................... 37 3.6 Simulations Performed with the Contact Program ................................................... 38 3.6.1 Analysis of Different Profile Modifications’ Impact on the Contact Stresses ....... 38 3.6.2 Investigation of the Impact from Lead Modification ............................................. 40 4. Results and Discussion 43 4.1 Validation ................................................................................................................. 43 4.1.1 Discussion............................................................................................................... 44 4.2 Linear vs. Parabolic Profile Modification ................................................................ 44 4.2.1 Simulations Including Edge Contact ............................................................... 45 4.2.2 Simulations Excluding Edge Contact .............................................................. 47 4.2.3 Comparison with LDP ..................................................................................... 50 4.2.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 52 4.3 Investigation of the Impact from Lead Modification ............................................... 52 4.3.1 Gears without Lead Modification .................................................................... 53 4.3.2 Gears with Lead Modification ......................................................................... 55 4.3.3 Comparison of the Results ............................................................................... 58 4.3.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 58 4.4 Presentation of the Contact Program........................................................................ 59 4.4.1 The GUI ........................................................................................................... 59 4.4.2 Output from the Contact