What Is Right with Marriage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Is Right with Marriage What is Right with Marriage An Outline of Domestic Theory Robert C. Binkley and Frances W. Binkley 1929 Robert C. Binkley and Frances W. Binkley, What is Right with Marriage: An Outline of Domestic Theory (New York: D. Appleton, 1929) Digitized and edited by Peter Binkley Version: 2016-06-05 12:47:00 https://www.wallandbinkley.com/rcb/works/marriage To the extent possible under law, Peter Binkley has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to “What is Right with Marriage”. This work is published from: Canada. Generated with jekyll-book ¶ https://github.com/pbinkley/jekyll-book What is Right with Marriage 1 Front Matter [cover] What Is Right with Marriage An Outline of Domestic Theory ROBERT C. BINKLEY and FRANCES WILLIAMS BINKLEY [p.i] What Is Right with Marriage [p.ii] [p.iii] What Is Right with Marriage An Outline of Domestic Theory by Robert C. Binkley New York University and Frances Williams Binkley New York and London D. Appleton and Company 1929 [p.iv] COPYRIGHT – 1929 – BY D. APPLETON AND COMPANY PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [p.v] TO R. T. C. [p.vi] [p.vii] What is Right with Marriage 2 Preface IF some one denounces a butcher or grocer for giving short weight, the denun- ciation implies the existence of a system of weights and measures. If some one condemns the conduct of a neighbor, the condemnation implies the acceptance of an ethical standard which the neighbor is alleged to have violated. And if it is asserted that something is wrong with marriage, there is equally implied a standard of judgment, a criterium of what, with marriage, would be right. What then is the standard whereby marriage is to be measured? Keyserling writes as if it were character development; Hamilton plans his research as if it were primarily “sexual-reactive value”; the sociologists turn out their textbooks in the seeming conviction that marriage is to be measured by its contribution to social welfare. Is there then no standard of excellence intrinsic to marriage itself? The present essay purposes to explore the ground in search of such a standard. Since the book has such a purpose, there are a number of things it cannot be. It cannot be a sex book, like some recent productions, with hymns to contraception and a sexological interpretation of history, for marriage involves more than sex. Neither can it range, like other discussions of contemporary morals, through all fields of ethical interest; it must be confined to the problem of marriage. It cannot be a survey of marriage in America, [p.viii] such as resulted from Judge Lindsey’s long observation of the behavior of the youth of Denver, or from Dr. G. V. Hamilton’s scientific study of the lives of two hundred New Yorkers, or from the interesting study of “Middletown” made by the Lynds. The marriage phenomenon is more widely distributed in space than Denver, New York, or Middletown, and in time than the twentieth century. Just as the descriptive study of marriage and family life concerns itself with particular times and places, so the normative study searches for truths that will be universally applicable, irrespective of time and place. The descriptive method presents particular facts; the normative method sets up universal standards. Science is itself both descriptive and normative. Its product is organized knowledge. The organization of knowledge requires not only the collection of facts but also the setting up of classifications and categories. The facts are in the realm of the actual, the classifications in the realm of the ideal. Facts are tested by observation, classifications by logic. If marriage is to be treated as an object of science, these two kinds of exploration must go forward hand in hand. A science of marriage and family life can be expected to develop, as economics, political science, and sociology have already developed, in the interplay of theoretical speculation and statistical research. Research such as Dr. Hamilton’s study of what is wrong with marriage in contemporary America calls, therefore, for a complementary analysis of what is right with marriage in all times and places. Is it not strange that among all the multitude of sciences and academic disciplines which have set themselves up in independent state, there is none What is Right with Marriage 3 which constitutes a [p.ix] science or theory of the family? It has happened, quite by accident, that the study of family relations has been regarded as a province of sociology. Books on the family are classified as sociology, and the sociological point of view has dominated the academic discussion of family life. Our best organized thought upon domestic relations proceeds from purely so- ciological postulates and imputes to marriage and home primarily sociological standards of excellence – to perpetuate the race, to transmit the social heritage. But the point of view and the method of sociology may after all, be ill adapted to the investigation of the essentials of family life. Doubtless if family studies had happened to grow up as appendages to economics or political theory, the methods and presuppositions of these disciplines would have been equally inad- equate. May it not then be useful to experiment with sketching the outlines of a theory of the family which shall build itself up immediately from the facts and purposes that appear in marriage and home, without making use of the preconception that there are “social institutions”? Such efforts as this may lead ultimately to the creation of a new academic discipline which shall furnish more adequate cadres for the organization of thought upon this most pressing and intimate problem of human life. Acknowledgments are due to many friends whose thought has been lav- ishly lent to this work. Among them are to be mentioned Mervyn Crobaugh, Frederic Anderson, Malcolm McComb, Cecil Pearson and Joan Wilson Pearson, Kenneth Robertson and Sidney Hawkins Robertson, Conrad P. Wright, Dr. Es- ther Caukin, and Professor John Morris of New York University. Miss [p.x] Katherine Beswick and Edwin R. Clapp have been especially patient in reading and criticizing the manuscript. The underlying thought out of which the book grew we owe to the stimulating intellectual companionship of Professor Robert T. Crane of the University of Michigan. R. C. B. F. W. B. [p.xi] Contents PAGE Preface vii CHAPTER I. How It Came About That Domestic Theory Was Written Down 1 II. Diverse Theories of Marriage and of the Family which Now Prevail 7 III. The Place of Domestic Theory among the Social Sciences 20 IV. Of the Nature of a Personal Relationship 31 V. Of the Nature of Marriage 42 VI. The Natural Family 52 VII. The Family and Convention 63 What is Right with Marriage 4 VIII. The Family and Authority 78 IX. The Family and Self-Interest 89 X. The Domestic View of Human Nature 101 XI. Appreciation 123 XII. Time, Love, and Habit 128 XIII. The Function of the Family 134 [p.xii] XIV. The Four Types of the Natural Family 156 XV. Marriage and Children 167 XVI. Marriage and Sex Monopoly 188 XVII. Marriage and Art 219 XVIII. Marriage and the Individual 248 Index 259 [p.xiii] What Is Right with Marriage [p.xiv] [p.1] Chapter I: How It Came About That Domestic Theory was Written Down THE authors of this little book are married. They have been married for years. Having loved each other completely, they still do not venture to dogmatize upon the probability that this love will continue through an indefinite future, but they think that their marriage has been successful, and they expect it to continue so. And they recall with indulgent tenderness the caution and circumspection with which they made the decision to marry. They prepared the way with an extraordinary amount of preliminary thought and discussion. It was a curious argument, carried on in that spirit of mingled playfulness and earnestness which is natural to two young people who sit together in the moonlight. Their purpose was to clarify their own ideas on the problem and mystery of marriage. Their method was the method of the schools. For both of them had been long in the atmosphere of the schools. They were familiar with the quaint attitudes which professors take toward the practical problems of life. They had learned in their classes many of the intricate theories of human conduct which are held in university circles. The language of the social sciences [p.2] flowed easily from their lips. And yet they recognized that the question then uppermost in their minds – whether to marry or not to marry – was one which the textbooks evaded and the theories missed. They set forth therefore to write their own textbook and to construct their own theory. Upon What is Right with Marriage 5 their collaboration was shed not only the light of the student’s lamp but also the light of the stars. This outline of domestic theory is the result. It is not easy to view with scholastic detachment anything so intimately personal as one’s own courtship is while it is in progress. Moreover, there stands a wide-spread prejudice against such an attitude. It is generally believed that marriage should result from impulse rather than from reasoned judgment and decision. A cold calculating of consequences or a mathematical estimating of probabilities is thought to be foreign to the spirit of the institution. The only frame of mind which can decently be held by bride or groom is one of naive and unbounded optimism. An atmosphere of illusion is deemed as needful as a ring and a clergyman for the conventional wedding.
Recommended publications
  • Who's Who at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (1939)
    W H LU * ★ M T R 0 G 0 L D W Y N LU ★ ★ M A Y R MyiWL- * METRO GOLDWYN ■ MAYER INDEX... UJluii STARS ... FEATURED PLAYERS DIRECTORS Astaire. Fred .... 12 Lynn, Leni. 66 Barrymore. Lionel . 13 Massey, Ilona .67 Beery Wallace 14 McPhail, Douglas 68 Cantor, Eddie . 15 Morgan, Frank 69 Crawford, Joan . 16 Morriss, Ann 70 Donat, Robert . 17 Murphy, George 71 Eddy, Nelson ... 18 Neal, Tom. 72 Gable, Clark . 19 O'Keefe, Dennis 73 Garbo, Greta . 20 O'Sullivan, Maureen 74 Garland, Judy. 21 Owen, Reginald 75 Garson, Greer. .... 22 Parker, Cecilia. 76 Lamarr, Hedy .... 23 Pendleton, Nat. 77 Loy, Myrna . 24 Pidgeon, Walter 78 MacDonald, Jeanette 25 Preisser, June 79 Marx Bros. —. 26 Reynolds, Gene. 80 Montgomery, Robert .... 27 Rice, Florence . 81 Powell, Eleanor . 28 Rutherford, Ann ... 82 Powell, William .... 29 Sothern, Ann. 83 Rainer Luise. .... 30 Stone, Lewis. 84 Rooney, Mickey . 31 Turner, Lana 85 Russell, Rosalind .... 32 Weidler, Virginia. 86 Shearer, Norma . 33 Weissmuller, John 87 Stewart, James .... 34 Young, Robert. 88 Sullavan, Margaret .... 35 Yule, Joe.. 89 Taylor, Robert . 36 Berkeley, Busby . 92 Tracy, Spencer . 37 Bucquet, Harold S. 93 Ayres, Lew. 40 Borzage, Frank 94 Bowman, Lee . 41 Brown, Clarence 95 Bruce, Virginia . 42 Buzzell, Eddie 96 Burke, Billie 43 Conway, Jack 97 Carroll, John 44 Cukor, George. 98 Carver, Lynne 45 Fenton, Leslie 99 Castle, Don 46 Fleming, Victor .100 Curtis, Alan 47 LeRoy, Mervyn 101 Day, Laraine 48 Lubitsch, Ernst.102 Douglas, Melvyn 49 McLeod, Norman Z. 103 Frants, Dalies . 50 Marin, Edwin L. .104 George, Florence 51 Potter, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright 2013 Shawn Patrick Gilmore
    Copyright 2013 Shawn Patrick Gilmore THE INVENTION OF THE GRAPHIC NOVEL: UNDERGROUND COMIX AND CORPORATE AESTHETICS BY SHAWN PATRICK GILMORE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Michael Rothberg, Chair Professor Cary Nelson Associate Professor James Hansen Associate Professor Stephanie Foote ii Abstract This dissertation explores what I term the invention of the graphic novel, or more specifically, the process by which stories told in comics (or graphic narratives) form became longer, more complex, concerned with deeper themes and symbolism, and formally more coherent, ultimately requiring a new publication format, which came to be known as the graphic novel. This format was invented in fits and starts throughout the twentieth century, and I argue throughout this dissertation that only by examining the nuances of the publishing history of twentieth-century comics can we fully understand the process by which the graphic novel emerged. In particular, I show that previous studies of the history of comics tend to focus on one of two broad genealogies: 1) corporate, commercially-oriented, typically superhero-focused comic books, produced by teams of artists; 2) individually-produced, counter-cultural, typically autobiographical underground comix and their subsequent progeny. In this dissertation, I bring these two genealogies together, demonstrating that we can only truly understand the evolution of comics toward the graphic novel format by considering the movement of artists between these two camps and the works that they produced along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Osamu Tezuka and the First Story Manga
    Osamu Tezuka and the First Story Manga powerful preconceived notion that manga was for fun and laughs ha ha ha, no matter how cinematically complex you draw something, it Ryan Holmberg was simply not going to be a ‘story.’ That’s just cinematic enjoyment. A true ‘story’ is like an epic drama, or even a bildungsroman [kyo-yo- sho- setsu], with ups and downs in the drama, and a view of what it means Osamu Tezuka’s (1928–89) The Mysterious Underground Men to be human. Human life is not always happy. There is tragicomedy, ( Chiteikoku no kaijin, February 1948) occupies an elevated position a humanism that is a jumbled mix of tragedy and comedy. The in the history of Japanese comics. It might not be as legendary as depiction of characters’ personalities also becomes necessary. First the artist’s debut book, the collaborative New Treasure Island (Shin there is the need for dramaturgy. And it was in order to establish takarajima, January 1947), but as the “first of my story manga,” as the dramaturgy that this sort of cinematic imagery came about, after the author put it in his afterword to the 1982 reissue of The Mysterious fact.” Underground Men, it was arguably more foundational for the Previous Japanese cartoonists might have liked movies and subsequent evolution of the medium than New Treasure Island’s use of the theater, Tezuka continues, “but what they created was not drama. wordless cinematic breakdowns. It was farce, and vaudeville. The focus was on wit and gags, ending with Of course, there had been book-length children’s comics with everyone laughing ha ha ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Picture Reviews
    MOTION PICTURE REVIEWS WOMEN’S UNIVKSI17 CLUB LOS ANGCLCS.CAL/r Vol. Ill 1932 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 with funding from Media History Digital Library https://archive.org/details/motionpicturerev00wome_1 MOTION PICTURE REVIEWS THE WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY CLUB LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 1932 THE WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY CLUB LOS ANGELES BRANCH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN 943 South Hoover Street <$xj> Telephone DRexel 2177 <Sx8> Copyright by Women’s University Club 1931 WEBBCRAFT PRINTERS. 1051 ARLINGTON AVE , LOS ANGELES Motion Picture Reviews Three MOTION • PICTURE • REVIEWS Published monthly by THE WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY CLUB LOS ANGELES BRANCH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN Mrs. John Vruwink Mrs. Gerard A. Murray ) Co-Chairmen Mrs. Palmer Cook, \ Preview Chairman Editors Mrs. J. Allen Davis Mrs. Arthur Jones Mrs. Walter Van Dyke Mrs. Palmer Cook M rs. John Vruwink, Mrs. F. H. Partridge Address all communications to The Women’s University Club, 943 South Hoover Street, Los Angeles, California. VOL. III. No. 1 JANUARY, 1932 10c per Copy, $1.00 per Year FEATURE FILMS 4 BEAU HUNKS » » lem and the crime situation, realistic and ex- Laurel and Hardy. Direction by James citing. Mr. Huston gives an excellent charac- terization. Horne. M.G.M. Adolescents, 12 to 16 Children, 8 to 12 When Hardy’s best girl refuses him, he and Laurel join the Foreign Legion and become Not suitable No heroes through a series of blunders only possi- C+-9 ble to these incomparable comedians. The picture follows the well known Laurel and COCK OF THE AIR » » Hardy formula and will delight their many Billie Dove, Chester Morris, .Watt Moore followers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Life of Comics: Socializing and Seriality Carol L. Tilley
    The Secret Life of Comics: Socializing and Seriality Carol L. Tilley, Presenter Sara Bahnmaier, Recorder Dr. Carol Tilley delivered a vision session to the 32nd annual meeting of NASIG in Indianapolis, Indiana, on the history of comics readership and libraries, particularly in the United States during the mid-twentieth century, and the relevance of comics to libraries in the present. It raised awareness for the audience about progress that has been made on comics collecting and programming, as well as the need for librarians to continue and heighten their enthusiasm for this work . It also reminded us that comics tell stories and communicate ideas. They are part of our cultural heritage and they have been for decades. In questions and answers, the audience discussed both the challenges and the rewards of acquiring and organizing comics at their own institutions. (After the introduction by Steve Kelley on behalf of NASIG): It helps me to acknowledge the ground on which I stand by connecting the personal with the professional. Let me start here: Steve mentioned that I’m a native of Indiana and I was born and raised in Vevay, Indiana, near to but a little cut off from Indianapolis by the hills and the river. I was really fortunate as a kid growing up to be living on the same block as the library. Because the library and my parents’ house were the only buildings in town with the same dark red wire-cut brick, and the same red Spanish clay tile roof, I assumed that it was a link between the library and me.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Kostelanetz
    Other Works by Richard Kostelanetz Fifty Untitled Constructivst Fictions (1991); Constructs Five (1991); Books Authored Flipping (1991); Constructs Six (1991); Two Intervals (1991); Parallel Intervals (1991) The Theatre of Mixed Means (1968); Master Minds (1969); Visual Lan­ guage (1970); In the Beginning (1971); The End of Intelligent Writing (1974); I Articulations/Short Fictions (1974); Recyclings, Volume One (1974); Openings & Closings (1975); Portraits from Memory (1975); Audiotapes Constructs (1975); Numbers: Poems & Stories (1975); Modulations/ Extrapolate/Come Here (1975); Illuminations (1977); One Night Stood Experimental Prose (1976); Openings & Closings (1976); Foreshortenings (1977); Word sand (1978); ConstructsTwo (1978); “The End” Appendix/ & Other Stories (1977); Praying to the Lord (1977, 1981); Asdescent/ “The End” Essentials (1979); Twenties in the Sixties (1979); And So Forth Anacatabasis (1978); Invocations (1981); Seductions (1981); The Gos­ (1979); More Short Fictions (1980); Metamorphosis in the Arts (1980); pels/Die Evangelien (1982); Relationships (1983); The Eight Nights of The Old Poetries and the New (19 81); Reincarnations (1981); Autobiogra­ Hanukah (1983);Two German Horspiel (1983);New York City (1984); phies (1981); Arenas/Fields/Pitches/Turfs (1982); Epiphanies (1983); ASpecial Time (1985); Le Bateau Ivre/The Drunken Boat (1986); Resume American Imaginations (1983); Recyclings (1984); Autobiographicn New (1988); Onomatopoeia (1988); Carnival of the Animals (1988); Ameri­ York Berlin (1986); The Old Fictions
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... The Graphic Memoir and the Cartoonist’s Memory A Dissertation Presented by Alice Claire Burrows to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature Stony Brook University August 2016 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Alice Claire Burrows We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. _________________________________________________________ Raiford Guins, Professor, Chairperson of Defense _________________________________________________________ Robert Harvey, Distinguished Professor, Cultural Analysis & Theory, Dissertation Advisor _________________________________________________________ Krin Gabbard, Professor Emeritus, Cultural Analysis & Theory _________________________________________________________ Sandy Petrey, Professor Emeritus, Cultural Analysis & Theory _________________________________________________________ David Hajdu, Associate Professor, Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School ___________________________ Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (PDF 851KB)
    Preface This is a report about strengthening marital relationships. It is about preventing marital distress and the consequent breakdown of relationships. It arises from our concern for children; for their future, their happiness, and their ability to form their own loving and fulfilling relationships. Marriage has been substantially redefined in recent times. In the words of Dr Don Edgar, the former director of the Australian Institute of Family Studies, marriage has been defined backwards by reference to divorce over the past two decades. Marriage and divorce have often resulted in polarised views within the community. A debate continues between those who say that divorce is a right, not to be encumbered in any way; and those who maintain that it has led to social breakdown and adverse consequences for both adults and children. We believe that there is another, alternative way forward through the adoption of a national strategy to strengthen marriages and relationships. This strategy calls for a renewed focus on the underlying objectives of marriage and family law in Australia, and the determination to achieve a new balance. The introduction of the Family Law Act 1975 reflected changes to matrimonial laws in much of the western world. Prior to 1959, divorce law in Australia remained under the jurisdictions of the States. In that year, the Commonwealth Government, pursuant to s 51 of the Constitution, introduced its own legislation in the form of the Matrimonial Causes Bill. The effect of the Bill was to consolidate the laws of the States into a code of general application throughout Australia. The Act provided 14 grounds for divorce.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphic Novel Il Graphic Novel Crossover Per La Per Modernità
    Biblioteca di Studi E. Bacchereti, F. Fastelli, D Salvadori Fastelli, F. E. Bacchereti, a cura di di Filologia Moderna Elisabetta Bacchereti Federico Fastelli Diego Salvadori Il Un graphic novel graphic Il graphic novel crossover per la modernità per la . Un crossover per la modernità FUP FIRENZE PRESSUNIVERSITY BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI DI FILOLOGIA MODERNA ISSN 2420-8361 (ONLINE) – 56 – DIPARTIMENTO DI FORMAZIONE, LINGUE, INTERCULTURA, LETTERATURE E PSICOLOGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LANGUAGES, INTERCULTURES, LITERATURES AND PSYCHOLOGY (FORLILPSI) Università degli Studi di Firenze / University of Florence BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI DI FILOLOGIA MODERNA (BSFM) Collana Open Access “diamante” fondata e diretta da Beatrice Tottossy dal 2004 al 2020 “Diamond” Open Access Series founded and directed by Beatrice Tottossy (2004-2020) Direttori / Editors-in-Chief Giovanna Siedina, Teresa Spignoli, Rita Svandrlik Coordinatore tecnico-editoriale / Managing Editor Arianna Antonielli Comitato scientifico internazionale / International Scientific Board (http://www.fupress.com/comitatoscientifico/biblioteca-di-studi-di-filologia-moderna/23) Enza Biagini (Professore Emerito), Nicholas Brownlees, Martha Canfield, Richard Allen Cave (Emeritus Professor, Royal Holloway, University of London), Massimo Ciaravolo (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia), Anna Dolfi (Professore Emerito), Mario Domenichelli (Professore Emerito), Maria Teresa Fancelli (Professore Emerito), Massimo Fanfani, Federico Fastelli, Paul Geyer (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn), Sergej Akimovich
    [Show full text]
  • Sequential Art, Graphic Novels, and Comics Brian Kelley
    SANE journal: Sequential Art Narrative in Education Volume 1 Article 10 Issue 1 Comics in the Contact Zone 1-1-2010 Sequential Art, Graphic Novels, and Comics Brian Kelley Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sane Part of the American Literature Commons, American Popular Culture Commons, Art Education Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Creative Writing Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Higher Education Commons, Illustration Commons, Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons, Rhetoric and Composition Commons, and the Visual Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kelley, Brian (2010) "Sequential Art, Graphic Novels, and Comics," SANE journal: Sequential Art Narrative in Education: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sane/vol1/iss1/10 This Emanata is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in SANE journal: Sequential Art Narrative in Education by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. WW Kelley: Sequential Art, Graphic Novels, and Comics Sequential Art, Graphic Novels, & Comics “Anyone interested in comics, from the cAsuAl broWser to the seAsoned professionAl, Will leArn something neW by reAding this pAper.” — gene Yang* *author of American Born Chinese (2007, First Second Books); Loyola Chin & the San Peligran Order (2004, SLG Publishing); Gordon Yamamoto, King of the Geeks (2004, SLG Publishing); co-author, The Eternal Smile (2009, First Second Books) Published by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2010 1 SANE journal: Sequential Art Narrative in Education, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME AUTHOR Camperell, Kay, Ed.; Hayes
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 419 221 CS 013 186 AUTHOR Camperell, Kay, Ed.; Hayes, Bernard L., Ed.; Telfer, Richard, Ed. TITLE Promises, Progress and Possibilities: Perspectives of Literacy Education. INSTITUTION American Reading Forum. ISSN ISSN-0895-3562 PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 242p.; For Volume 16, see ED 405 572. Selected papers presented at the Annual Conference of the American Reading Forum (Sanibel Island, FL, December 1996). PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) Collected Works Serials (022) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) JOURNAL CIT Yearbook of the American Reading Forum; v17 1997 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Basic Skills; Educational Cooperation; Elementary Secondary Education; Higher Education; *Internet; *Literacy; National Standards; Picture Books; Preservice Teachers; *Professional Development; Reading Comprehension; *Reading Instruction; Reading Motivation; Reading Research; Standardized Tests; Story Telling; Teacher Education IDENTIFIERS *Educational Issues ABSTRACT Papers in this collection focus on diverse issues in literacy ranging from motivation to wordless books to professional development schools. Papers in the collection, and their authors, are as follows: "The New Literacy and Reading Workshop: How Comfortable Is Too Comfortable?" (Jeanne Henry); "Fostering Reading Motivation: Insights from Theory and Research" (Linda B. Gambrell and Rose Marie Codling); "Standards for the English Language Arts: Stylish but Stillborn" (Thomas Cloer, Jr.); "Skill Standards: Establishing a Framework for Basic Skills" (Eunice N. Askov); "Balanced Reading Programs: Exploring Their Essentials" (Mona W. Matthews; Jerry L. Johns; Victoria J. Risko; Marian Tonjes); "Wordless Books: Promise and Possibilities, A Genre Comes of Age" (Sarah Dowhower); "Reading Instruction in the Middle School Mathematics Classroom" (Chet H. Laine; Terry L. Bullock; Bob Drake); "The Relationship of Standardized Reading Scores to Children's Self-Perception as Readers" (Thomas Cloer, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 YEARS at the PHOENIX Archive of an Oxford Cinema 1913 – 2013
    100 YEARS AT THE PHOENIX Archive of an Oxford Cinema 1913 – 2013 Hiu M Chan Dedicated to the Phoenix and Oxford with love This archive is part of a post-graduate research project and so is work-in-progress. While every effort has been made to weed out errors and inconsistencies – derived from the source material (newspaper microfi che archives) – some will have inevitably slipped through. If you spot any errors and omissions please get in touch via the website http://phoenixcentenary.wordpress.com and we will update the database. The publishers are not responsible for the verifi cation of the entries; that is my remit. Thank you. Hiu M Chan and the Phoenix Centenary Project Published in conjunction with the centenary of the Oxford Phoenix Picture, 57 Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6AE © Hiu M Chan, 2013 All right reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior written permission of the author. ISBN 978-0-9567405-5-7 Design: Nick Withers Associate Editor: James Harrison Film lists typeset in Helvetica Neue Digitally printed and bound in England by Charlesworth Press, Wakefi eld, Yorkshire A special limited hardback edition was also published exclusively for use in the cinema on the 100th anniversary, 15th March 2013. For further details, research feedback, or to input any updates, corrections or amendments please contact: www.hiuandfi lm.com Oxfordfolio, 100A Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JE Preface 15th March 2013 marks the 100th anniversary of the Phoenix Picturehouse Cinema in Oxford.
    [Show full text]