Tasmanian Government's 2012 Submission to Infrastructure Australia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brighton Structure Plan
Brighton Structure Plan June 2009 Ref: 38318-001 Document Control Document ID: P:\URBAN\CURRENT PROJECTS\38318 BRIGHTON STRUCTURE PLAN\REPORT\PDF JUNE 09\REPORT REV 6.DOC Rev No Date Revision Details Typist Author Verifier Approver 0 17.11.08 Partial Draft – Stage 1 SA SA RM RM 1 04.12.08 Partial Draft – Stage 1 – Revised SA SA RM RM 2 24.03.09 Provisional Draft Report (Revised scope) SA SA RM RM 3 06.04.09 Final Draft Report SA SA RH (client) RM 4 12.05.09 Final Report SA SA RH (client) RM 5 18.05.09 Final Report following Planning Committee comments SA SA RH (client) RM 6 03.06.09 Final Report following Council and DIER comments SA SA RH (client) RM A person using Connell Wagner documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Connell Wagner. Brighton Structure Plan Brighton Council Contents Section Page 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Introduction 4 2.1 Context 4 2.2 The Project 5 2.3 Structure Plan Process and Stages 5 3. Vision 7 4. Existing Conditions and Site Analysis 8 4.1 Location 8 4.2 Physical Form 8 4.3 Transport 8 4.4 Infrastructure 11 4.5 Natural Environment 11 4.6 Heritage and Cultural Significance 13 4.7 SWOT Analysis 14 5. Policy and Strategic Planning Context 16 5.1 Introduction 16 5.2 State 16 5.3 Regional 17 5.4 Local 22 6. -
The Southern Tasmanian Advantage a Guide to Investment Opportunities and Industrial Precincts
THE SOUTHERN TASMANIAN ADVANTAGE A GUIDE TO INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND INDUSTRIAL PRECINCTS Office of the Coordinator–General www.cg.tas.gov.au CONTENTS SOUTHERN TASMANIA REGION .................................................................................................................... 4 KEY STRENGTHS ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 WELCOME TO SOUTHERN TASMANIA ....................................................................................................... 6 SOUTHERN TASMANIAN COUNCILS AUTHORITY FOREWORD .................................................... 7 OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR-GENERAL: HOW WE CAN HELP.........................................................................................................8 PART A: REGIONAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 9 KEY STATISTICS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 THE PLACE ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................11 -
Background Report No.8 Regional Transport System
Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy Background Report No.8: The Regional Transport System September 2010 This document is detailed supporting information for the Regional Land Use Strategy for Southern Tasmania. While every responsible effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of Tasmania, the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, the 12 Southern Councils and the Sullivans Cove Waterfront Authority, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Please visit www.stca.tas.gov.au or telephone the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority on 61 3 6270 2242 with any queries. Acknowledgements This background report has been produced with the assistance of the Department of Infrastructure Energy & Resource. Information in this report is strongly derived from the work associated with the Southern Integrated Transport Plan (a joint initiative of the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority and the Department of Infrastructure, Energy & Resources). This report is intended to provide an overview of the aspects of the regional transport system that are relevant to the preparation of a regional land use Strategy only. More detailed information on the regional transport system can be obtained from the Southern Region Background Report (November 2006). Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Transport Planning Responsibilities 1 1.3 The Region’s Transport System 2 1.4 Strategic Planning and Analysis 8 2. Development of the Region’s Transport System 9 3. -
Bridgewater Bridge Refurbishment
2009 (No. 9) 2009 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Bridgewater Bridge Refurbishment ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Green Mrs Napier By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 00000 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................2 EXISTING SITUATION ...............................................................................................................3 SCOPE OF WORKS.......................................................................................................................5 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION...................................................................................................... 12 PROJECT COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 13 EVIDENCE ..................................................................................................................................... 13 DOCUMENTS TAKEN INTO EVIDENCE ...........................................................................28 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION......................................................................28 -
Midland Highway – Mangalore to Bagdad Upgrades and Future Bagdad Bypass
Tasmanian Government 2012 Transport Submission to Infrastructure Australia Midland Highway – Mangalore to Bagdad Upgrades and future Bagdad Bypass August 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Proposal Summary Initiative Name: Burnie to Hobart Freight Corridor: Midland Highway (Bagdad to Mangalore Location (State/Region(or City)/ Locality): Southern Midlands, Tasmania Name of Proponent Entity: Tasmanian Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Contact (Name, Position, phone/e-mail): David Spence, General Manager Infrastructure Strategy Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Tel: (03) 6233 2089 Email: [email protected] Executive summary This project has already been recognized as a priority by both the Australian and Tasmanian Governments. Federal funding for planning was approved in February 2009. This current submission seeks funding for the next stage of this major project leading to its construction. The Midland Highway is the State’s major north-south transport corridor and a key link in Tasmanian’s National Land Transport Network (NLTN). The Highway is both a critical freight connection facilitating access from the Southern region to the State’s northern ports and the major transport link for passengers (including tourists) travelling between the northern and southern regions. The Auslink Tasmania Corridor Strategy (2006) forecasts a 67 per cent increase in daily heavy vehicle traffic future growth along the section of the Highway (between Brighton and Conara) between 2005 and 2030. Passenger vehicle traffic is expected to grow by 34% over the same period. The primary function of the Midland Highway is to provide safe, high-speed travel for freight and passenger vehicles. However, safety and efficiency over the southern section is currently significantly compromised, with implications for future economic growth in greater Hobart and southern Tasmania more widely. -
Southern Integrated Transport Plan 2010
Southern Integrated Transport Plan 2010 Contents Foreword.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Regional Characteristics and Trends................................................................................................................................................................. 8 The Future Context................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2030: What type of regional transport system do we want?........................................................................................................... 18 Strategic Policy Area One – Infrastructure................................................................................................................................................... 20 Strategic Policy Area Two – People.................................................................................................................................................................. -
New Bridgewater Bridge
Tasmanian Government 2012 Transport Submission to Infrastructure Australia New Bridgewater Bridge August 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Proposal Summary Initiative Name: Burnie to Hobart Freight Corridor: New Bridgewater Bridge Location (State/Region(or City)/ Locality): Bridgewater, Southern Tasmania Name of Proponent Entity: Tasmanian Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Contact (Name, Position, phone/e-mail): David Spence, General Manager Infrastructure Strategy Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Tel: (03) 6233 2089 Email: [email protected] Executive summary This project has already been recognized as a priority by both the Australian and Tasmanian Governments. Federal funding for planning was approved in February 2009. This current submission seeks funding for the next stage of this major project leading to its construction. The Midland Highway, of which the Bridgewater Bridge is a key component, is the State’s major north-south transport corridor and a key link in Tasmanian’s National Network. The Highway is both a critical freight connection facilitating access from the Southern region to the State’s northern ports and the major transport link for passengers (including tourists) travelling between the northern and southern regions. The primary function of the Midland Highway is to provide safe, high-speed travel for freight and passenger vehicles. However, safety and efficiency over the southern section is currently significantly compromised, with implications for future economic growth in Greater Hobart and southern Tasmania more widely. The existing Bridgewater Bridge was built in the 1940s and does not meet contemporary loading and design standards. It is not able to reliably perform its functions as part of the National Network due to dimensional limitations and the increasing likelihood of periods of closure from climate change-related events (e.g. -
Project: Brighton Town Centre Local Area Plan
Project: Brighton Town Centre Local Reference: 230898 Prepared for: Brighton Area Plan Council Final Report Revision: 5 22 November 2012 Document Control Record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 12, 60 Albert Road South Melbourne VIC 3205 PO Box 321 South Melbourne VIC 3205 Australia T +61 3 8683 1333 F +61 3 8683 1444 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report Title Brighton Town Centre Local Area Plan Report Document ID Project Number 230898-001-01 \\Aumelpfs01\Projects\PES\Current Projects\Projects 2012-\230898 Brighton File Path Local Area Plan\Final Report\Brighton Local Area Plan_Final_22.11.12.docx Client Brighton Council Client Contact James Dryburgh Rev Date Revision Details/Status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver 1 30 August 2012 Draft for client review SM SM/CH CH JG 2 3 September 2012 Draft for Public Exhibition SM SM/CH CH JG 3 2 November 2012 Draft for Council Consideration SM SM/CH CH JG 4 13 November 2012 Final SM SM/CH CH JG 5 22 November 2012 Minor amendments SM SM/CH CH JG Current Revision 5 Approval Name Sarah McMaster Name Jules Griffiths Title Urban Planner Title Associate Project 230898-001-01 File Brighton Local Area Plan_Final_22.11.12.docx 22 November 2012 Revision -
Brooker Highway Transport Plan
Brooker Highway Transport Plan February 2011 Department of Infrastructure, 1 Energy and Resources EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Brooker Highway Transport Plan sets a shared vision for the future of the Brooker Highway. The Plan delineates objectives and principles for future investment in the highway for the short, medium and long term, to enable the highway to cater for current demand and future transport needs. VISION Brooker Highway will continue to be a safe and efficient urban highway, able to cater for a large and growing transport task (including freight and passengers) and facilitate local transport access. OBJECTIVES To achieve the Plan’s vision, the key objectives for the Brooker Highway are to: Maintain capacity and travel time reliability for efficient movement of freight and passengers Improve road safety and reduce crash rates, through strategies and infrastructure solutions Improve local connectivity between residential areas and activity centres for both vehicles and pedestrians, including connections to key local roads (e.g. Main Road) Create land use planning and development patterns that support the function of the Brooker Manage infrastructure assets to deliver appropriate level of service and visual amenity Monitor future trends in the transport system to adapt planning and meet changes in demand Improve residential amenity for people living along the Brooker Highway PROJECT PRIORITIES To achieve the Plan’s objectives, a series of priority projects and key initiatives have been identified. Using current information, the Plan identifies priority projects over the short (immediate to three years), medium (three to 10 years) and long (10 to 25 years) term. Capacity and efficiency priorities are based on analysis of current and predicted future traffic volumes, the effect of these volumes on intersection and road segment levels of service, and ability to improve travel time reliability through non‐infrastructure solutions. -
Tasmanian Government Submission to the National Infrastructure Audit
Tasmanian Government submission to the National Infrastructure Audit July 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Tasmanian economy has undergone significant structural change in the past decade, which has contributed to the State’s long-term recovery in economic performance characterised by strong employment growth, a substantial reduction in unemployment, high levels of private sector investment and population growth. These structural changes include: • growth in Tasmania’s total productive capacity, and the potential to improve Tasmania’s productivity, through increased private and public investment; • increased household wealth due, in part, to the realignment of Tasmanian house prices with those on the mainland; • an expanded tourism sector due to the budget airline market; • the development of a natural gas market in Tasmania and increased competition in the electricity and gas retail markets; • closer integration with the national and international economies; and • a transformed fiscal position, including the elimination of State net debt, which has led to improved tax competitiveness and higher levels of business confidence. The effect of these structural changes has been a change in Tasmania’s industrial base, with high productivity industries such as mining, finance and insurance, and some high value manufacturing growing at a faster average rate in the five years to 2006-07 than experienced nationally. These industries have, in recent years, also accounted for a greater share of total factor income than previously. Essential to sustaining this economic growth over future decades is further infrastructure investment targeted at maximising Tasmania’s competitive advantages and facilitating productivity improvements and industry investment. An interpretation of ‘nationally significant infrastructure’ that focuses solely on urban congestion and bottlenecks in the major cities ignores the potential productivity gains to be realised by investing in nationally significant regional infrastructure. -
Brighton Bypass Project, Tasmania
INFS 2022 Project Management: Principles and Strategies Assessment 2 – Project Analysis Report Brighton Bypass Project, Tasmania xxx Table of Contents INFS 2022 Project Management: Principles and Strategies xxxx Assessment 2 – Project Analysis Report Page 2 of 15 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Project Stakeholder Analysis 6 How the Project was Managed 7 Critical Analysis of Project Outcome 8 Conclusion 10 Reference List 11 Appendix A – Principle Stakeholders 13 Appendix B – Opportunities Register 14 INFS 2022 Project Management: Principles and Strategies xxxx Assessment 2 – Project Analysis Report Page 3 of 15 Executive Summary This report critically analyses the successful completion of The Brighton Bypass Project in Hobart, Tasmania and how the project was planned and performed. It reinforces the importance of project definition and needs identification in the initial phase of the project life cycle. The Brighton Bypass cost the Australian Government $191 million and construction took place from April 2009 to November 2012. The main objective of the project was to provide a safer and more efficient highway for both commuters and freight movers. A project stakeholder analysis was conducted which identified the principle stakeholders as the client – the Tasmanian Government’s Department for Infrastructure, Energy and Resources; the two main contracted joint ventures which were responsible for constructing a section of the project each – Thiess and VEC Civil Engineering (VEC Thiess JV – northern section) and John Holland and Hazell Bros (JHHB – southern section); and the local Aboriginal community who wanted to conserve the land in which part of the project was being proposed to be built on. A Stakeholder Management team was assigned to engage the community in the project and mitigate any concerns or disruptions in the project. -
Brighton Bypass Project
THE PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS MET IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, HOBART, ON MONDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2008 INQUIRY INTO BRIGHTON BYPASS PROJECT Mr DAVID SPENCE AND Mr PHIL CANTILLON, PROJECT DIRECTORS, Mr DAVID CONLEY, PROJECT MANAGER AND Ms SELENA DIXON, SENIOR PROJECT OFFICER, BRIGHTON TRANSPORT HUB PROJECT, DIER, WERE CALLED, MADE THE STATUTORY DECLARATION AND WERE EXAMINED. CHAIR (Mr Harriss) - Thank you. We will now proceed. Mr SPENCE - We have prepared as much as we possibly can to be in the position today to give you the information you want and to answer your questions. In that context we have noted past concerns from the committee about lack of information, so we have really done our best to give you as much as we can without overloading you with unnecessary detail. I thought I would plan to give you an overview - where the project fits in terms of the overall State transport situation and what is the rationale in that context. Then, after that, I will hand over to David Conley who will talk about the costs and the time lines and the design. We are very enthusiastic about this project. As a general overview statement, it really is rare that you can get an opportunity to work on a project like this that is really going to be of substantial benefit to future Tasmanian generations. So we feel pretty privileged in that regard. As we all know, freight is critical for us all. For all Tasmanians it really is the life-blood of the community. That is really what this project is all about in terms of an overview statement.