DOCSLIB.ORG

Manual.Pdf, with the HTML Version in the Directory Molpro/Doc/Manual/Index.Html

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manual.Pdf, with the HTML Version in the Directory Molpro/Doc/Manual/Index.Html MOLPRO Users Manual Version 2015.1 H.-J. Werner Institut fur¨ Theoretische Chemie Universitat¨ Stuttgart Pfaffenwaldring 55 D-70569 Stuttgart Federal Republic of Germany P. J. Knowles School of Chemistry Cardiff University Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT United Kingdom SHA1 799c067ea06f98486bf7c0119e19061330168cc6 (Copyright c 2015 TTI GmbH Stuttgart, Germany) i Introduction to MOLPRO MOLPRO is a complete system of ab initio programs for molecular electronic structure calcula- tions, designed and maintained by H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, and containing contributions from a number of other authors. As distinct from other commonly used quantum chemistry packages, the emphasis is on highly accurate computations, with extensive treatment of the electron correlation problem through the multiconfiguration-reference CI, coupled cluster and associated methods. The recently developed explicitly correlated coupled-cluster methods yield CCSD(T) results with near basis set limit accuracy already with double−z or triple−z basis sets, thus reducing the computational effort for calculations of this quality by two orders of magnitude. Using local electron correlation methods, which significantly reduce the increase of the computational cost with molecular size, accurate ab initio calculations can be performed for much larger molecules than with most other programs. These methods have recently been augmented by explicitly correlated terms, which strongly reduce both the basis set truncation errors and the errors of the local approximations. The heart of the program consists of the multiconfiguration SCF, multireference CI, and coupled- cluster routines, and these are accompanied by a full set of supporting features. The package comprises • Integral generation for generally contracted symmetry adapted gaussian basis functions (spd f ghi). There are two programs with identical functionality: the preferred code is SEWARD (R. Lindh) which is the best on most machines; ARGOS (R. M. Pitzer) is avail- able as an alternative, and in some cases is optimum for small memory scalar machines. Also two different gradient integral codes, namely CADPAC (R. Amos) and ALASKA (R. Lindh) are available. Only the latter allows the use of generally contracted symmetry adapted gaussian basis functions. • Effective Core Potentials (contributions from H. Stoll). • Many one-electron properties. 2 2 2 • Some two-electron properties, e.g. Lx, Ly, Lz , LxLy etc.. • Closed-shell and open-shell (spin restricted and unrestricted) self consistent field. • Density-functional theory in the Kohn-Sham framework with various gradient corrected exchange and correlation potentials. • Multiconfiguration self consistent field. This is the quadratically convergent MCSCF procedure described in J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 5053. The program can optimize a weighted energy average of several states, and is capable of treating both completely gen- eral configuration expansions and also long CASSCF expansions as described in Chem. Phys. Letters 115 (1985) 259. • Multireference perturbation theory (MRPT2, CASPT2, CASPT3), including (extended) multi-state methods MS-CASPT2 and XMS-CASPT2 as described in Mol. Phys. 89, 645 (1996), J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5546 (2000), J. Chem. Phys. 135, 081106 (2011). • Multireference CI. As well as the usual single reference function approaches (MP2, SDCI, CEPA), this module implements the internally contracted multireference CI method as described in J. Chem. Phys. 89 (1988) 5803 and Chem. Phys. Lett. 145 (1988) 514. Non variational variants (e.g. MR-ACPF), as described in Theor. Chim. Acta 78 (1990) 175, are also available. Electronically excited states can be computed as described in Theor. Chim. Acta, 84 95 (1992). A new more efficient MRCI implementation is described in J. Chem. Phys. 135, 054101 (2011). ii • Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MPPT), Coupled-Cluster (CCSD), Quadratic config- uration interaction (QCISD), and Brueckner Coupled-Cluster (BCCD) for closed shell systems, as described in Chem. Phys. Lett. 190 (1992) 1. Perturbative corrections for triple excitations can also be calculated (Chem. Phys. Letters 227 (1994) 321). • Open-shell coupled cluster theories as described in J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 5219, Chem. Phys. Letters 227 (1994) 321. • An interface to the MRCC program of M. Kallay, allowing coupled-cluster calculations with arbitrary excitation level. • Full Configuration Interaction. This is the determinant based benchmarking program de- scribed in Comp. Phys. Commun. 54 (1989) 75. • Analytical energy gradients for SCF, DFT, state-averaged MCSCF/CASSCF, MRPT2/CASPT2, MP2 and QCISD(T) methods. • Analytical non-adiabatic coupling matrix elements for MCSCF. • Valence-Bond analysis of CASSCF wavefunction, and energy-optimized valence bond wavefunctions as described in Int. J. Quant. Chem. 65, 439 (1997). • One-electron transition properties for MCSCF, MRCI, and EOM-CCSD wavefunctions, CASSCF and MRCI transition properties also between wavefunctions with different or- bitals, as described in Mol. Phys. 105, 1239, (2007). • Spin-orbit coupling, as described in Mol. Phys., 98, 1823 (2000). More recently, a new spin-orbit integral program for generally contracted basis sets has been implemented. • Douglas-Kroll-Hess Hamiltonian up to arbitrary order and the eXact-2-Component (X2C) Hamiltonian. • Density-functional theory symmetry-adapted intermolecular perturbation theory (with den- sity fitting), DFT-SAPT , as described in J. Chem. Phys. 122, 014103 (2005). 2 • Some two-electron transition properties for MCSCF wavefunctions (e.g., Lx etc.). • Mulliken population analysis and Natural Population Analysis (NPA) • Orbital localization. • Natural bond orbitals (NBOs). • Distributed Multipole Analysis (A. J. Stone). • Automatic geometry optimization as described in J. Comp. Chem. 18, (1997), 1473. Constrained optimization is also possible. • Automatic calculation of vibrational frequencies, intensities, and thermodynamic proper- ties. • Reaction path following, as described in Theor. Chem. Acc. 100, (1998), 21. • Efficient facilities to treat large lattices of point charges for QM/MM calculations, includ- ing lattice gradients. • Various utilities allowing other more general optimizations, looping and branching (e.g., for automatic generation of complete potential energy surfaces), general housekeeping operations. iii • Geometry output in XYZ, MOLDEN and Gaussian formats; molecular orbital and fre- quency output in MOLDEN format. • Integral-direct implementation of all Hartree-Fock, DFT and pair-correlated methods (MP, CCSD, MRCI etc.), as described in Mol. Phys., 96, (1999), 719. At present, perturbative triple excitation methods are not implemented. • Local second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (LMP2) and local coupled cluster methods, as described in in J. Chem. Phys. 104, 6286 (1996), Chem. Phys. Lett. 290, 143 (1998), J. Chem. Phys. 111, 5691 (1999), J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9443 (2000), J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9986 (2000), Chem. Phys. Letters 318, 370 (2000), J. Chem. Phys. 114, 661 (2001), Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 3941 (2002), J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8772 (2002). • Local density fitting methods, as described in J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8149 (2003), Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 3349 (2003), Mol. Phys. 102, 2311 (2004). • Analytical energy gradients for LMP2, DF-LMP2, and LQCISD as described in J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5185, (1998), Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 4853 (2001), J. Chem. Phys. 121, 737 (2004). • Analytical energy gradients for CASSCF, CASPT2, MS-CASPT2, and XMS-CASPT2 as described in J. Chem. Phys. 119, 5044 (2003). J. Chem. Phys. 135, 081106 (2011), J. Chem. Phys., 138, 104104 (2013). • Explicitly correlated MP2-F12 and CCSD(T)-F12 methods, as described in J. Chem. Phys. 119, 4607 (2003), J. Chem. Phys. 121, 4479 (2004), J. Chem. Phys. 124, 054114 (2006), J. Chem. Phys. 124, 094103 (2006), J. Chem. Phys. 127, 221106 (2007), J. Chem. Phys. 130, 054104 (2009). • Explicitly correlated local LMP2-F12 and LCCSD(T)-F12 methods, as described in J. Chem. Phys. 129, 101103 (2009), J. Chem. Phys. 130, 054106 (2009), J. Chem. Phys. 130, 241101 (2009), J. Chem. Phys. 135, 144117 (2011), Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 7591 (2012). • Explicitly correlated multireference methods (CASPT2-F12, MRCI-F12), as described in J. Chem. Phys. 133, 141103 (2010), J. Chem. Phys. 134, 034113 (2011), J. Chem. Phys. 134, 184104 (2011), Mol. Phys. 111, 607 (2013). • Parallel execution on distributed memory machines, as described in J. Comp. Chem. 19, (1998), 1215. At present, SCF, DFT, MRCI, MP2, LMP2, CCSD(T), LCCSD(T) energies and SCF, DFT gradients are parallelized. Most density fitted codes such as DF-HF, DF- KS, DF-LMP2, DF-LMP2 gradients, DF-LCCSD(T), DF-MP2-F12, DF-DFT-SAPT, and GIAO-DF-HF NMR shieldings are also parallelized. • Automatic embarrassingly parallel computation of numerical gradients and Hessians (mppx Version). The program is written mostly in standard Fortran–90. Those parts which are machine depen- dent are maintained through the use of a supplied preprocessor, which allows easy intercon- version between versions for different machines. Each release of the program is ported and tested on a number of systems. A large library of commonly used orbital basis sets is available, which can be extended as required. There is a comprehensive users’ manual, which includes installation instructions. The manual is available in PDF and also in HTML for mounting on a Worldwide Web server. More recent methods and enhancements include: iv 1. Explicitly correlated MP2-F12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education
    Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education Susi Lehtola∗,y and Antti J. Karttunenz yMolecular Sciences Software Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States zDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland E-mail: [email protected].fi Abstract Long in the making, computational chemistry for the masses [J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 104] is finally here. We point out the existence of a variety of free and open source software (FOSS) packages for computational chemistry that offer a wide range of functionality all the way from approximate semiempirical calculations with tight- binding density functional theory to sophisticated ab initio wave function methods such as coupled-cluster theory, both for molecular and for solid-state systems. By their very definition, FOSS packages allow usage for whatever purpose by anyone, meaning they can also be used in industrial applications without limitation. Also, FOSS software has no limitations to redistribution in source or binary form, allowing their easy distribution and installation by third parties. Many FOSS scientific software packages are available as part of popular Linux distributions, and other package managers such as pip and conda. Combined with the remarkable increase in the power of personal devices—which rival that of the fastest supercomputers in the world of the 1990s—a decentralized model for teaching computational chemistry is now possible, enabling students to perform reasonable modeling on their own computing devices, in the bring your own device 1 (BYOD) scheme. In addition to the programs’ use for various applications, open access to the programs’ source code also enables comprehensive teaching strategies, as actual algorithms’ implementations can be used in teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Density Functional Theory
    Density Functional Approach Francesco Sottile Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau - France European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF) 22 October 2010 Density Functional Theory 1. Any observable of a quantum system can be obtained from the density of the system alone. < O >= O[n] Hohenberg, P. and W. Kohn, 1964, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 Density Functional Theory 1. Any observable of a quantum system can be obtained from the density of the system alone. < O >= O[n] 2. The density of an interacting-particles system can be calculated as the density of an auxiliary system of non-interacting particles. Hohenberg, P. and W. Kohn, 1964, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 Kohn, W. and L. Sham, 1965, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 Density Functional ... Why ? Basic ideas of DFT Importance of the density Example: atom of Nitrogen (7 electron) 1. Any observable of a quantum Ψ(r1; ::; r7) 21 coordinates system can be obtained from 10 entries/coordinate ) 1021 entries the density of the system alone. 8 bytes/entry ) 8 · 1021 bytes 4:7 × 109 bytes/DVD ) 2 × 1012 DVDs 2. The density of an interacting-particles system can be calculated as the density of an auxiliary system of non-interacting particles. Density Functional ... Why ? Density Functional ... Why ? Density Functional ... Why ? Basic ideas of DFT Importance of the density Example: atom of Oxygen (8 electron) 1. Any (ground-state) observable Ψ(r1; ::; r8) 24 coordinates of a quantum system can be 24 obtained from the density of the 10 entries/coordinate ) 10 entries 8 bytes/entry ) 8 · 1024 bytes system alone. 5 · 109 bytes/DVD ) 1015 DVDs 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation.Pdf
    INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC CORRELATION PROBLEM PAUL E.S. WORMER Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Rayleigh-SchrÄodinger perturbation theory 4 3 M¿ller-Plesset perturbation theory 7 4 Diagrammatic perturbation theory 9 5 Unlinked clusters 14 6 Convergence of MP perturbation theory 17 7 Second quantization 18 8 Coupled cluster Ansatz 21 9 Coupled cluster equations 26 9.1 Exact CC equations . 26 9.2 The CCD equations . 30 9.3 CC theory versus MP theory . 32 9.4 CCSD(T) . 33 A Hartree-Fock, Slater-Condon, Brillouin 34 B Exponential structure of the wavefunction 37 C Bibliography 40 1 1 Introduction These are notes for a six hour lecture series on the electronic correlation problem, given by the author at a Dutch national winterschool in 1999. The main purpose of this course was to give some theoretical background on the M¿ller-Plesset and coupled cluster methods. Both computational methods are available in many quantum chemical \black box" programs. The audi- ence consisted of graduate students, mostly with an undergraduate chemistry education and doing research in theoretical chemistry. A basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry is pre- supposed. In particular a knowledge of Slater determinants, Slater-Condon rules and Hartree-Fock theory is a prerequisite of understanding the following notes. In Appendix A this theory is reviewed briefly. Because of time limitations hardly any proofs are given, the theory is sketchily outlined. No attempt is made to integrate out the spin, the theory is formulated in terms of spin-orbitals only.
    [Show full text]
  • Basis Sets Running a Calculation • in Performing a Computational
    Session 2: Basis Sets • Two of the major methods (ab initio and DFT) require some understanding of basis sets and basis functions • This session describes the essentials of basis sets: – What they are – How they are constructed – How they are used – Significance in choice 1 Running a Calculation • In performing a computational chemistry calculation, the chemist has to make several decisions of input to the code: – The molecular geometry (and spin state) – The basis set used to determine the wavefunction – The properties to be calculated – The type(s) of calculations and any accompanying assumptions 2 Running a calculation •For ab initio or DFT calculations, many programs require a basis set choice to be made – The basis set is an approx- imate representation of the atomic orbitals (AOs) – The program then calculates molecular orbitals (MOs) using the Linear Combin- ation of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) approximation 3 Computational Chemistry Map Chemist Decides: Computer calculates: Starting Molecular AOs determine the Geometry AOs O wavefunction (ψ) Basis Set (with H H ab initio and DFT) Type of Calculation LCAO (Method and Assumptions) O Properties to HH be Calculated MOs 4 Critical Choices • Choice of the method (and basis set) used is critical • Which method? • Molecular Mechanics, Ab initio, Semiempirical, or DFT • Which approximation? • MM2, MM3, HF, AM1, PM3, or B3LYP, etc. • Which basis set (if applicable)? • Minimal basis set • Split-valence • Polarized, Diffuse, High Angular Momentum, ...... 5 Why is Basis Set Choice Critical? • The
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Supporting Information How to Select Ionic Liquids as Extracting Agent Systematically? Special Case Study for Extractive Denitrification Process Shurong Gaoa,b,c,*, Jiaxin Jina,b, Masroor Abroc, Ruozhen Songc, Miao Hed, Xiaochun Chenc,* a State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China b Research Center of Engineering Thermophysics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China c Beijing Key Laboratory of Membrane Science and Technology & College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, PR China d Office of Laboratory Safety Administration, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China * Corresponding author, Tel./Fax: +86-10-6443-3570, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 1 COSMO-RS Computation COSMOtherm allows for simple and efficient processing of large numbers of compounds, i.e., a database of molecular COSMO files; e.g. the COSMObase database. COSMObase is a database of molecular COSMO files available from COSMOlogic GmbH & Co KG. Currently COSMObase consists of over 2000 compounds including a large number of industrial solvents plus a wide variety of common organic compounds. All compounds in COSMObase are indexed by their Chemical Abstracts / Registry Number (CAS/RN), by a trivial name and additionally by their sum formula and molecular weight, allowing a simple identification of the compounds. We obtained the anions and cations of different ILs and the molecular structure of typical N-compounds directly from the COSMObase database in this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Construction of Quantum–Classical Hybrid Models Arxiv:2102.09355V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 18 Feb 2021
    Automated construction of quantum{classical hybrid models Christoph Brunken and Markus Reiher∗ ETH Z¨urich, Laboratorium f¨urPhysikalische Chemie, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland February 18, 2021 Abstract We present a protocol for the fully automated construction of quantum mechanical-(QM){ classical hybrid models by extending our previously reported approach on self-parametri- zing system-focused atomistic models (SFAM) [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16 (3), 1646{1665]. In this QM/SFAM approach, the size and composition of the QM region is evaluated in an automated manner based on first principles so that the hybrid model describes the atomic forces in the center of the QM region accurately. This entails the au- tomated construction and evaluation of differently sized QM regions with a bearable com- putational overhead that needs to be paid for automated validation procedures. Applying SFAM for the classical part of the model eliminates any dependence on pre-existing pa- rameters due to its system-focused quantum mechanically derived parametrization. Hence, QM/SFAM is capable of delivering a high fidelity and complete automation. Furthermore, since SFAM parameters are generated for the whole system, our ansatz allows for a con- venient re-definition of the QM region during a molecular exploration. For this purpose, a local re-parametrization scheme is introduced, which efficiently generates additional clas- sical parameters on the fly when new covalent bonds are formed (or broken) and moved to the classical region. arXiv:2102.09355v1 [physics.chem-ph] 18 Feb 2021 ∗Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction In contrast to most protocols of computational quantum chemistry that consider isolated molecules, chemical processes can take place in a vast variety of complex environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Hamiltonians Derived from Equation-Of-Motion Coupled-Cluster
    Effective Hamiltonians derived from equation-of-motion coupled-cluster wave-functions: Theory and application to the Hubbard and Heisenberg Hamiltonians Pavel Pokhilkoa and Anna I. Krylova a Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0482 Effective Hamiltonians, which are commonly used for fitting experimental observ- ables, provide a coarse-grained representation of exact many-electron states obtained in quantum chemistry calculations; however, the mapping between the two is not triv- ial. In this contribution, we apply Bloch's formalism to equation-of-motion coupled- cluster (EOM-CC) wave functions to rigorously derive effective Hamiltonians in the Bloch's and des Cloizeaux's forms. We report the key equations and illustrate the theory by examples of systems with electronic states of covalent and ionic characters. We show that the Hubbard and Heisenberg Hamiltonians are extracted directly from the so-obtained effective Hamiltonians. By making quantitative connections between many-body states and simple models, the approach also facilitates the analysis of the correlated wave functions. Artifacts affecting the quality of electronic structure calculations such as spin contamination are also discussed. I. INTRODUCTION Coarse graining is commonly used in computational chemistry and physics. It is ex- ploited in a number of classic models serving as a foundation of modern solid-state physics: tight binding[1, 2], Drude{Sommerfeld's model[3{5], Hubbard's [6] and Heisenberg's[7{9] Hamiltonians. These models explain macroscopic properties of materials through effective interactions whose strengths are treated as model parameters. The values of these pa- rameters are determined either from more sophisticated theoretical models or by fitting to experimental observables.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory
    An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2000 1 Introduction Hartree-Fock theory is fundamental to much of electronic structure theory. It is the basis of molecular orbital (MO) theory, which posits that each electron's motion can be described by a single-particle function (orbital) which does not depend explicitly on the instantaneous motions of the other electrons. Many of you have probably learned about (and maybe even solved prob- lems with) HucÄ kel MO theory, which takes Hartree-Fock MO theory as an implicit foundation and throws away most of the terms to make it tractable for simple calculations. The ubiquity of orbital concepts in chemistry is a testimony to the predictive power and intuitive appeal of Hartree-Fock MO theory. However, it is important to remember that these orbitals are mathematical constructs which only approximate reality. Only for the hydrogen atom (or other one-electron systems, like He+) are orbitals exact eigenfunctions of the full electronic Hamiltonian. As long as we are content to consider molecules near their equilibrium geometry, Hartree-Fock theory often provides a good starting point for more elaborate theoretical methods which are better approximations to the elec- tronic SchrÄodinger equation (e.g., many-body perturbation theory, single-reference con¯guration interaction). So...how do we calculate molecular orbitals using Hartree-Fock theory? That is the subject of these notes; we will explain Hartree-Fock theory at an introductory level. 2 What Problem Are We Solving? It is always important to remember the context of a theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular GPU-Accelerated Applications
    LIFE & MATERIALS SCIENCES GPU-ACCELERATED APPLICATIONS | CATALOG | AUG 12 LIFE & MATERIALS SCIENCES APPLICATIONS CATALOG Application Description Supported Features Expected Multi-GPU Release Status Speed Up* Support Bioinformatics BarraCUDA Sequence mapping software Alignment of short sequencing 6-10x Yes Available now reads Version 0.6.2 CUDASW++ Open source software for Smith-Waterman Parallel search of Smith- 10-50x Yes Available now protein database searches on GPUs Waterman database Version 2.0.8 CUSHAW Parallelized short read aligner Parallel, accurate long read 10x Yes Available now aligner - gapped alignments to Version 1.0.40 large genomes CATALOG GPU-BLAST Local search with fast k-tuple heuristic Protein alignment according to 3-4x Single Only Available now blastp, multi cpu threads Version 2.2.26 GPU-HMMER Parallelized local and global search with Parallel local and global search 60-100x Yes Available now profile Hidden Markov models of Hidden Markov Models Version 2.3.2 mCUDA-MEME Ultrafast scalable motif discovery algorithm Scalable motif discovery 4-10x Yes Available now based on MEME algorithm based on MEME Version 3.0.12 MUMmerGPU A high-throughput DNA sequence alignment Aligns multiple query sequences 3-10x Yes Available now LIFE & MATERIALS& LIFE SCIENCES APPLICATIONS program against reference sequence in Version 2 parallel SeqNFind A GPU Accelerated Sequence Analysis Toolset HW & SW for reference 400x Yes Available now assembly, blast, SW, HMM, de novo assembly UGENE Opensource Smith-Waterman for SSE/CUDA, Fast short
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Assisted Catalyst Development Via Automated Modelling of Conformationally Complex Molecules
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Computer‑assisted catalyst development via automated modelling of conformationally complex molecules: application to diphosphinoamine ligands Sibo Lin1*, Jenna C. Fromer2, Yagnaseni Ghosh1, Brian Hanna1, Mohamed Elanany3 & Wei Xu4 Simulation of conformationally complicated molecules requires multiple levels of theory to obtain accurate thermodynamics, requiring signifcant researcher time to implement. We automate this workfow using all open‑source code (XTBDFT) and apply it toward a practical challenge: diphosphinoamine (PNP) ligands used for ethylene tetramerization catalysis may isomerize (with deleterious efects) to iminobisphosphines (PPNs), and a computational method to evaluate PNP ligand candidates would save signifcant experimental efort. We use XTBDFT to calculate the thermodynamic stability of a wide range of conformationally complex PNP ligands against isomeriation to PPN (ΔGPPN), and establish a strong correlation between ΔGPPN and catalyst performance. Finally, we apply our method to screen novel PNP candidates, saving signifcant time by ruling out candidates with non‑trivial synthetic routes and poor expected catalytic performance. Quantum mechanical methods with high energy accuracy, such as density functional theory (DFT), can opti- mize molecular input structures to a nearby local minimum, but calculating accurate reaction thermodynamics requires fnding global minimum energy structures1,2. For simple molecules, expert intuition can identify a few minima to focus study on, but an alternative approach must be considered for more complex molecules or to eventually fulfl the dream of autonomous catalyst design 3,4: the potential energy surface must be frst surveyed with a computationally efcient method; then minima from this survey must be refned using slower, more accurate methods; fnally, for molecules possessing low-frequency vibrational modes, those modes need to be treated appropriately to obtain accurate thermodynamic energies 5–7.
    [Show full text]
  • Camcasp 5.9 Alston J. Misquitta† and Anthony J
    CamCASP 5.9 Alston J. Misquittay and Anthony J. Stoneyy yDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary, University of London, 327 Mile End Road, London E1 4NS yy University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW September 1, 2015 Abstract CamCASP is a suite of programs designed to calculate molecular properties (multipoles and frequency- dependent polarizabilities) in single-site and distributed form, and interaction energies between pairs of molecules, and thence to construct atom–atom potentials. The CamCASP distribution also includes the programs Pfit, Casimir,Gdma 2.2, Cluster, and Process. Copyright c 2007–2014 Alston J. Misquitta and Anthony J. Stone Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Authors . .1 1.2 Citations . .1 2 What’s new? 2 3 Outline of the capabilities of CamCASP and other programs 5 3.1 CamCASP limits . .7 4 Installation 7 4.1 Building CamCASP from source . .9 5 Using CamCASP 10 5.1 Workflows . 10 5.2 High-level scripts . 10 5.3 The runcamcasp.py script . 11 5.4 Low-level scripts . 13 6 Data conventions 13 7 CLUSTER: Detailed specification 14 7.1 Prologue . 15 7.2 Molecule definitions . 15 7.3 Geometry manipulations and other transformations . 16 7.4 Job specification . 18 7.5 Energy . 23 7.6 Crystal . 25 7.7 ORIENT ............................................... 26 7.8 Finally, . 29 8 Examples 29 8.1 A SAPT(DFT) calculation . 29 8.2 An example properties calculation . 30 8.3 Dispersion coefficients . 34 8.4 Using CLUSTER to obtain the dimer geometry . 36 9 CamCASP program specification 39 9.1 Global data .
    [Show full text]
  • Starting SCF Calculations by Superposition of Atomic Densities
    Starting SCF Calculations by Superposition of Atomic Densities J. H. VAN LENTHE,1 R. ZWAANS,1 H. J. J. VAN DAM,2 M. F. GUEST2 1Theoretical Chemistry Group (Associated with the Department of Organic Chemistry and Catalysis), Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands 2CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury WA4 4AD, United Kingdom Received 5 July 2005; Accepted 20 December 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20393 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: We describe the procedure to start an SCF calculation of the general type from a sum of atomic electron densities, as implemented in GAMESS-UK. Although the procedure is well known for closed-shell calculations and was already suggested when the Direct SCF procedure was proposed, the general procedure is less obvious. For instance, there is no need to converge the corresponding closed-shell Hartree–Fock calculation when dealing with an open-shell species. We describe the various choices and illustrate them with test calculations, showing that the procedure is easier, and on average better, than starting from a converged minimal basis calculation and much better than using a bare nucleus Hamiltonian. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 27: 926–932, 2006 Key words: SCF calculations; atomic densities Introduction hrstuhl fur Theoretische Chemie, University of Kahrlsruhe, Tur- bomole; http://www.chem-bio.uni-karlsruhe.de/TheoChem/turbo- Any quantum chemical calculation requires properly defined one- mole/),12 GAMESS(US) (Gordon Research Group, GAMESS, electron orbitals. These orbitals are in general determined through http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/GAMESS.html, 2005),13 an iterative Hartree–Fock (HF) or Density Functional (DFT) pro- Spartan (Wavefunction Inc., SPARTAN: http://www.wavefun.
    [Show full text]