Horsemen's Information Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Thursday, October 10, 2002 Staff Contact: Kim Kawada (619) 595-5394 Or [email protected]
Members Shirley Horton, Chair (Representing South Bay) Mayor, Chula Vista Joe Kellejian, Vice Chair (Representing North County Coastal) Councilmember, Solana Beach Mickey Cafagna (Representing North County Inland) Mayor, Poway TRANSPORTATION Art Madrid (Representing East County) COMMITTEE Mayor, La Mesa AGENDA Dick Murphy Mayor, City of San Diego Ron Roberts Chair, Board of Supervisors Thursday, October 10, 2002 County of San Diego 12:15 p.m. Alternates SANDAG Board Room Ron Morrison th (Representing South Bay) 401 B Street, 7 Floor Councilmember, National City San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Ramona Finnila (Representing North County Coastal) Councilmember, Carlsbad Hal Martin (Representing North County Inland) Councilmember, San Marcos AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Jack Dale (Representing East County) • FREEWAY TO FREEWAY CONNECTORS STUDY Councilmember, Santee Brian Maienschein • 2002 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Councilmember, City of San Diego Bill Horn Supervisor, County of San Diego Advisory Members Leon Williams, Chair Metropolitan Transit Development Board Bob Emery, Alternate Metropolitan Transit Development Board Julianne Nygaard, Chair North San Diego County PLEASE TURN OFF Transit Development Board CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Pedro Orso-Delgado District Director, District 11 California Department of Transportation Tom Larwin, General Manager MISSION STATEMENT Metropolitan Transit The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. Development Board SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. Karen King, Interim Executive Director North San Diego County Transit Development Board San Diego Association of Governments ● 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Gary L. -
City of Solana Beach Comments on the Cities of Lemon Grove and Coronado Appeals
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org 635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075(858) 720-2400Fax (858) 720-2455 February 20, 2020 San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board of Directors 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 SUBJECT: COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF APPEALS BY THE CITY OF LEMON GROVE AND THE CITY OF CORONADO FOR A REVISION OF REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT (RHNA) ALLOCATIONS Dear Chairperson and Members of the Board: On or before January 6, 2020, the cities of Solana Beach, Lemon Grove, Coronado and Imperial Beach submitted appeals pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.05 for a revision of the shares of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) methodology adopted for the 6th cycle. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.05(c), the City of Solana Beach submits the following comments in support of the appeals filed by Lemon Grove and Coronado. A. The City of Lemon Grove’s Appeal 1. The draft allocation disproportionately allocates housing units to jurisdictions based on the existence of transit stations within their boundaries The City of Lemon Grove correctly identifies a flaw in the draft allocation that undermines the statutory objectives in Government Code Section 65584(d) with respect to the transit component of the methodology. Specifically, the draft allocation disproportionately allocates housing units to jurisdictions based on the existence of transit stations within their boundaries regardless of whether those transit stations are serving neighboring jurisdictions. That residents within neighboring jurisdictions utilize transit stations within Lemon Grove and Solana Beach and the extent of their use was readily available information that was presented by both Lemon Grove and Solana Beach. -
San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Frequently Asked Questions San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project
San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Frequently Asked Questions San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Updated December 13, 2013 Frequently Asked Questions ■ OVERVIEW OF PROJECT 1. What is the purpose of the project? The project will improve a critical part of the 351-mile Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail corridor that serves as a vital link for passenger and freight movements in the San Diego region. The San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project will increase capacity and improve system reliability by adding a one-mile segment of double track between Solana Beach and Del Mar, resulting in a continuous 2.8-mile-long segment of double track. The project also includes the replacement of the existing 97-year-old San Dieguito River wooden trestle rail bridge and the construction of a new special events platform that would directly serve the Del Mar Fairgrounds. Additional improvements include construction of new turnouts, signals, retained embankments, and drainage facilities. 2. What is the scope of the project? The project’s engineering and environmental analysis process is underway. The environmental compliance is subject to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is the Lead Agency under NEPA. This project is funded through environmental and design, although not funded for construction. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) works to make all projects shovel ready. Although the start date for construction has yet to be determined, the project is planned to be constructed prior to 2030 according to the SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). -
GNA 2021 Merits List PCBC June 7.V2
THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS Judges Special Award for Historic Restoration The Best House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Photographer: Bernard Andre Photography / Eric Figge Photography The Starr House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Email: Sal Caruso: Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Email: Photographer: Eric Figge Photography Judges Special Award – Supportive Housing LifeMoves Mountain View Mountain View, CA Builder: XL Construction Developer: Sares Regis Group of Northern California Architect/Designer: Charles Bloszies, OCB Planner: Charles Bloszies, OCB Landscape Design: Charles Bloszies, OCB Civil Engineer: BKF Engineers Photographer: Keith Brown, Ken Rakestraw THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS CATEGORY 01 - BEST SPECIAL USE PROJECT Honeybee Discovery Center Orland, CA Architect/Designer: HMC Architects Landscape Design: Spurlock Civil Engineer: Integral Group Interior Designer: HMC Architects KLA New Amenities Building Milpitas, CA Builder: Level 10 Construction Developer: KLA Corporation Architect/Designer: Gould Evans Landscape Design: April Philips Design Works Civil Engineer: Luk and Associates Interior Designer: IA Interior Architects Photographer: Bruce Damonte Photography Pecan Square Greeting House Northlake, Texas Builder: Innovative Hardscape -
Store Number
Store Number STORE NAME State 0788 ANCHORAGE AK 0124 BIRMINGHAM AL 0140 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA AL 0724 HUNTSVILLE AL 0132 PINNACLE HILLS AR 0488 LITTLE ROCK AR 0016 BILTMORE AZ 0094 ARROWHEAD AZ 0168 SAN TAN VILLAGE AZ 0288 CHANDLER AZ 0364 SCOTTSDALE AZ 0480 TUCSON AZ 0736 THE QUARTER AZ 0926 PARK PLACE AZ 1258 DANA PARK AZ 1308 NORTERRA AZ 0026 SANTA MONICA CA 0028 HILLSDALE CA 0030 ANAHEIM CA 0032 HOLLYWOOD & HIGHLAND CA 0034 PASADENA CA 0036 FASHION VALLEY CA 0038 UNIVERSITY TOWNE CENTER CA 0048 STANFORD CA 0052 BURLINGAME CA 0058 POWELL STREET CA 0078 CENTURY CITY CA 0082 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 0088 FRESNO FASHION FAIR CA 0090 SANTA BARBARA CA 0104 BAKERSFIELD CA 0116 EMERYVILLE CA 0196 UNION STREET CA 0202 WALNUT CREEK CA 0206 NOVATO CA 0232 OTAY RANCH CA 0382 EMBARCADERO CA 0438 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 0462 PACIFIC COMMONS CA 0484 MODESTO CA 0494 TEMECULA CA 0614 CALABASAS CA 0646 VALENCIA CA 0672 AMERICANA CA 0674 PALM DESERT CA 0740 MALIBU CA 0914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 0922 MARINA DEL REY CA 0928 BEVERLY DRIVE CA 0934 MONTEREY CA 0938 WESTLAKE CA 0946 THE GROVE CA 0958 SANTANA ROW CA 1118 RIVER PARK CA 1128 CORTE MADERA TOWN CENTER CA 1134 CONCORD CA 1138 UNIVERSAL CITY WALK CA 1144 STUDIO CITY CA 1150 CHINO HILLS CA 1158 TUSTIN MARKET PLACE CA 1166 PACIFIC PALISADES CA 1168 LAUREL VILLAGE CA 1172 DALY CITY CA 1176 ALISO VILLAGE CA 1190 FOLSOM CA 1192 SANTEE CA 1200 BERKELEY CA 1202 SAN FRANCISCO CENTRE CA 1218 PALM SPRINGS CA 1222 ONE PASEO CA 1230 IRVINE SPECTRUM CA 1236 REDLANDS CA 1240 BISHOP RANCH CA 1250 LONG BEACH CA 1268 SHOPPES AT -
Comments Responses Rtc-1002
COMMENTS RESPONSES 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 LAUREL L. IMPETT, AICP T: 415 552-7272 F: 415 552-5816 Urban Planner www.smwlaw.com [email protected] July 17, 2012 Via Email Mayor Jerry Sanders and Members of the City Council City of San Diego City Administration Building 202 “C” Street San Diego, California 92101 [email protected] [email protected] Re: One Paseo Draft EIR Dear Mayor Sanders and Members of the City Council: On behalf of Cleveland National Forest Foundation (“CNFF”), we have reviewed the draft environmental impact report (“EIR”) for One Paseo, a massive mixed-use development project consisting of almost two million square feet of retail, office, residential and open space uses. If this Project were proposed in an urban area with convenient access to transit service, it 326.1 As discussed in responses to comments 4.1 and 10.40, the proposed would be considered “smart growth.” Yet because the Carmel Valley currently has no access to project is considered consistent with the City of Villages Strategy, which 326.1 convenient transit and because transit service is not contemplated to serve the Project until at least 2035, it is decidedly not a “smart growth” project. embraces the principles of smart growth. The project site is identified as having a moderate “Village Propensity” (see Figure LU-1 of the General Moreover, One Paseo would exacerbate already excessive levels of traffic Plan). As also discussed in response to comment 10.40, transit is planned 326.2 congestion on local and regional streets, intersections, freeways and freeway ramps. -
Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: Sam Schwartz Engineering and CHS Consulting Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Final Report Street Design Improvement Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Introduction and Study Background .......................................................................................................... I‐1 Study Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... I‐1 Overall Approach ..................................................................................................................................... I‐2 Initial Screening Stages and Results ......................................................................................................... II‐1 Initial corridor selection (108) ............................................................................................................... II‐1 Refined List of Candidate Corridors (43 Corridors) .............................................................................. -
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT of NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J
Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 49 Market St. Morristown, NJ 07960 Mark E. Hall, Esq. Martha B. Chovanes, Esq. Michael R. Herz, Esq. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: (973) 992-4800 Facsimile: (973) 992-9125 Proposed Counsel for L’Occitane, Inc. In Re: Chapter 11 L’OCCITANE, INC., Case No. 21-10632 Debtor. Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan Objections Due: February 26, 2021 NOTICE OF DEBTOR’S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP AS BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL TO THE DEBTOR NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 12, 2021, L’Occitane, Inc., debtor and debtor in possession (the “Debtor”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 case (the “Chapter 11 Case”) filed its application (the “Application”) pursuant to section 327(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rules 2014 and 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 2014-1 of the District of New Jersey Local Bankruptcy Rules (the “Local Rules”) for entry of an order authorizing and approving the Active\119547284.v1-2/12/21 Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 2 employment and retention of Fox Rothschild LLP (“Fox”) as attorneys to the Debtor in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date.1 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that objections, if any, to the relief requested must be made in writing and in the form prescribed by the Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 2014-1, and must be filed with this Court and served upon and received by proposed counsel to the Debtor at Fox Rothschild LLP, 49 Market Street, Morristown, NJ 07960 (Attn: Mark E. -
Contractor List
Active Licenses DBA Name Full Primary Address Work Phone # Licensee Category SIC Description buslicBL‐3205002/ 28/2020 1 ON 1 TECHNOLOGY 417 S ASSOCIATED RD #185 cntr Electrical Work BREA CA 92821 buslicBL‐1684702/ 28/2020 1ST CHOICE ROOFING 1645 SEPULVEDA BLVD (310) 251‐8662 subc Roofing, Siding, and Sheet Met UNIT 11 TORRANCE CA 90501 buslicBL‐3214602/ 28/2021 1ST CLASS MECHANICAL INC 5505 STEVENS WAY (619) 560‐1773 subc Plumbing, Heating, and Air‐Con #741996 SAN DIEGO CA 92114 buslicBL‐1617902/ 28/2021 2‐H CONSTRUCTION, INC 2651 WALNUT AVE (562) 424‐5567 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia SIGNAL HILL CA 90755‐1830 buslicBL‐3086102/ 28/2021 200 PSI FIRE PROTECTION CO 15901 S MAIN ST (213) 763‐0612 subc Special Trade Contractors, NEC GARDENA CA 90248‐2550 buslicBL‐0778402/ 28/2021 20TH CENTURY AIR, INC. 6695 E CANYON HILLS RD (714) 514‐9426 subc Plumbing, Heating, and Air‐Con ANAHEIM CA 92807 buslicBL‐2778302/ 28/2020 3 A ROOFING 762 HUDSON AVE (714) 785‐7378 subc Roofing, Siding, and Sheet Met COSTA MESA CA 92626 buslicBL‐2864402/ 28/2018 3 N 1 ELECTRIC INC 2051 S BAKER AVE (909) 287‐9468 cntr Electrical Work ONTARIO CA 91761 buslicBL‐3137402/ 28/2021 365 CONSTRUCTION 84 MERIDIAN ST (626) 599‐2002 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia IRWINDALE CA 91010 buslicBL‐3096502/ 28/2019 3M POOLS 1094 DOUGLASS DR (909) 630‐4300 cntr Special Trade Contractors, NEC POMONA CA 91768 buslicBL‐3104202/ 28/2019 5M CONTRACTING INC 2691 DOW AVE (714) 730‐6760 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia UNIT C‐2 TUSTIN CA 92780 buslicBL‐2201302/ 28/2020 7 STAR TECH 2047 LOMITA BLVD (310) 528‐8191 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia LOMITA CA 90717 buslicBL‐3156502/ 28/2019 777 PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION 1027 4TH AVE subc Painting and Paper Hanging LOS ANGELES CA 90019 buslicBL‐1920202/ 28/2020 A & A DOOR 10519 MEADOW RD (213) 703‐8240 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia NORWALK CA 90650‐8010 buslicBL‐2285002/ 28/2021 A & A HENINS, INC. -
Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003
Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Knight Program in Community Building University of Miami School of Architecture Charrette Team Members University of Miami Faculty Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, Dean Charles C. Bohl, Knight Program Director Jaime Correa, Professor in Community Building Knight Program Fellows Lester Abberger, Tom Borrup, Joyce Crosthwaite, Bill Gietema, Gloria Katz, Barbara Marshman, Neal Payton, Milt Rhodes, Kofi Sefa-Boakye, Arnold Spokane, Peter Swift, Laurie Volk Student Team Members The University of Miamiʼs 2002-2003 Suburb & Town Design Graduate Class and S. Mallick, T. Niyaomwan and M. Wiranta of San Jose State Universityʼs Planning Program Urban Design Consultant Daniel Parolek Graphic Design Russell Preston and Malik Benjamin, Knight Program Scholars Sponsors City of San Jose San Jose Redevelopment Agency Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group The San Jose Mercury News Viet Mercury Nuevo Mundo Knight Program in Community Building Thanks also to ADAPTEC and Cadence Design Systems Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 A. Overview of the Charrette Process 4 B. History & Regional Context of the Evergreen-Eastridge Area 5 C. Goals and Objectives 6 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 A. Regional Context 7 B. Environmental Setting 8 C. Transportation 9 D. Social Environment 10 E. Housing 11 F. Economic and Real Estate Context 12 G. Urban Form 13 H. Master Plan 15 IV. THE MASTER PLAN 16 A. Ideas Explored During the Charrette Process 16 B. Market Analysis 18 C. Town Plan 21 D. Transportation 28 E. Building Types 32 V. IMPLEMENTATION 34 A. Urban Design Guidelines 34 VI. COMMUNITY BUILDING STRATEGIES 35 A. -
Claremont Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
CLAREMONT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA City Council Chamber Tuesday 225 Second Street April 04, 2017 Claremont, CA 91711 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS RICHARD ROSENBLUTH CHAIR RICK REED JAMES JACKSON CYNTHIA HUMES K.M. WILLIAMSON DOUGLAS LYON LEIGH ANNE JONES CALL TO ORDER THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT CALENDAR Routine Administrative Items 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 17, 2017 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and file the regular Planning Commission meeting minutes of January 17, 2017. Attachment(s): Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 17, 2017 2. SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - COMMISSION WORKSHOP OF MARCH 15, 2017 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the Special Meeting minutes of March 15, 2017. Attachment(s): Special Meeting Minutes - Commissioner Workshop of March 15, 2017 PUBLIC HEARINGS Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda April 4, 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 3. CLAREMONT HERITAGE PRESENTATION ON UPDATING HISTORIC REGISTER - ORAL REPORT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the presentation. 4. SPECIFIC PLAN FOR VILLAGE SOUTH AREA - UPDATE ON CONSULTANT SELECTION AND PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the presentation. Attachment(s): City Council Staff Report and Attachments Dated March 28, 2017 5. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT - FOLLOW-UP FROM THE MARCH 15, 2017 COMMISSIONER WORKSHOP - ORAL REPORT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue their discussion regarding the local CEQA Guideline review. REPORTS Commission Mayor/Chair Meeting Commissioner Comments Staff Briefing on Council Meetings Briefing on Other Items Upcoming Agendas and Events ADJOURNMENT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAREMONT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE HELD ON, APRIL 18, 2017 AT 7:00 P.M. -
SAN DIEGO Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide
SAN DIEGO Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide Cushman & Wakefield | San Diego | 2019 0 Sun, surf and scenery define San Diego. Situated in the southernmost corner of California’s coastline, the city is set apart by a nearly ideal climate, 70 miles of coastline, vibrant nightlife, and diverse food culture — all of which contribute to its eclectic retail offerings. Those, combined with family-oriented recreation, luxurious accommodations around the county, and world-class arts and culture have made the city one of the top ten travel destinations in the United States, according to US News and World Reports. Named by National Geographic as one of the “World’s Smart Cities”, San Diego offers much more than off-duty fun. World-renowned academic institutions, research consortiums and innovation incubators also define the culture. The city is home to a number of major corporate headquarters and has a competitive stronghold in software, biotechnology and life sciences, aerospace and maritime technologies, healthcare, action sports and telecommunications. These industries, coupled with San Diego’s diverse residential base and steady stream of domestic and international tourists, generate demand for a wide array of retail products and services and create a distinctive retail environment. SAN DIEGO San Diego is the launching pad for many new food concepts, independent eateries and restaurant chains. OVERVIEW The vitality of the Food & Beverage sector is not surprising given the state’s abundance of agricultural products and proximity to innovative and celebrated chefs. Cushman & Wakefield | San Diego | 2019 1 SAN DIEGO KEY RETAIL STREETS & AREAS DOWNTOWN LA JOLLA / UTC Downtown has grown to encompass distinctive La Jolla is a prosperous coastal community within San neighborhoods, including: Little Italy, Cortez Hill, Columbia Diego County, located approximately 12 miles north of District, Marina District, Gaslamp Quarter and East Downtown San Diego.