2015 Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Queensgate Acquires Generator Hostels from Patron Capital in €450M Transaction
Embargoed until: 13 March 2017 at 0700hrs GMT Queensgate acquires Generator Hostels from Patron Capital in €450m transaction Queensgate Investments Fund II LP, which is managed by Queensgate Investments, a private equity real estate fund manager, has agreed to purchase design-led hostel owner and operator Generator Hostels from Patron Capital, the pan-European institutional investor focused on property backed investments, and its co-investment partner, Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate manager. The transaction has an enterprise value of circa €450m and is expected to complete in May. Generator Hostels, which was held in Patron Capital’s Fund III, owns 14 predominantly freehold assets (12 operational and two under development), totalling 8,639 beds, located in London, Paris, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Miami, Dublin, Hamburg, Barcelona, Berlin Mitte, Stockholm, Madrid, Venice, Berlin Prenzlauer Berg and Rome. Earning current revenues of over €70m, Generator Hostels targets the fast-growing sector of millennial customers, focusing on the best capital city addresses, design-led interiors, a safe environment and, most of all, attractive shared social spaces. Queensgate Investments intends to own the portfolio for the long term, enhance operations for customers, and invest in excess of €300m into adding more hostel assets. Keith Breslauer, Managing Director of Patron, said: “Generator has performed strongly under Patron’s ownership, during which time we have expanded the business significantly from just two hostels to 14, and have redefined the hostel concept into the design-led hospitality experience that today’s guests want. We are very pleased to have sold Generator to Queensgate, and are confident that the business will continue to grow and thrive under their stewardship.” Jason Kow, CEO of Queensgate Investments, said: “Generator Hostels represents high-quality freehold assets, robust revenues, an attractive lifestyle brand, and material scalability opportunities. -
Marketing Presentation Feb2020.Pdf
Summary Overview February 2020 Patron Capital Overview • Established European property investor over 20 years ➢ Operations across Europe with advisory offices in the UK, Luxembourg and Spain with major operating partners in most markets including in Germany, France and Portugal ➢ Experienced 73-person team including 30 investment professionals, supported by 11 advisers, with regional and product focused expertise o Average of 19 years experience across the investment team ➢ Hybrid owner operator model supporting local partners across Europe C. £62,000,000 $109,700,000 €303,000,000 €895,000,000 €1,100,000,000 €948,632,391 (including €100,000,000 dedicated (including €143,000,000 of (with GP commitment of (C. €96,000,000) discretionary co-investment pool and co-investment capital ) up to €45,000,000) apx. €220,000,000 of co-investment capital within investments) PATRON CAPITAL PATRON CAPITAL L.P., I PATRON CAPITAL L.P., II PATRON CAPITAL L.P., III PATRON CAPITAL L.P., IV PATRON CAPITAL, V L.P. CAPTIVE FUND EDICATED FUND RAISE D TARGETING OPPORTUNISTIC OR THE ACQUISITION OF Pan-European value Pan-European value-oriented Pan-European value-oriented Pan-European opportunistic F DISTRESSED AND UNDERVALUED OCWEN RENAMED oriented property and asset property and asset-based property and asset-based distressed property and asset UK ( PROPERTY AND PROPERTY IGROUP A LEADING based corporate investments corporate investments corporate investments based corporate investments ) RELATED INVESTMENTS ACROSS PLAYER IN THE SUB PRIME - EUROPE MORTGAGE MARKET October 1999 October 2002 October 2004 March 2007 July 2012 July 2016 2 Deep Value Investment Strategy • Identify granular and/or complex Value opportunities and properties within Indicator Classic Investment Path corporates Multiple/IRR Net Margin • Value-add through asset management, 2.2x/20-25% improved strategy and introduction of clear +50% Opportunistic Zone focus, sell into domestic market once asset stabilised 1.8x/17-20% +35% • Drive net equity multiple of 1.6x+ over 3-5 years 1.5x/17-20% +20% ➢ Target unlevered p.a. -
Trinity Capital Annual Report
Trinity Capital PLC | 2007 Annual Report Period ended 31 march 2007 Managed By Trikona Capital TrinityTrinity CapitalCapital PLCPLC 20072007 ‘We have made excellent progress, built up a strong portfolio, and are well positioned to take advantage of the partnerships we have established.’ Michael Cassidy, Chairman of Trinity Capital PLC, said: “We have made excellent progress with the fund being fully invested well ahead of our original timetable. We have built up a strong portfolio of diversified investments, across a range of key growth sectors and geographies, and are well positioned to take advantage of the partnerships we have established. Our focus has now switched from the successful deployment of the investment capital to management of the development projects as well as selective partial realization and redeployment of capital to investments with higher expected returns.” Highlights } Admitted to AIM on 21 April 2006, raising gross proceeds of £250m (net £238m) % } 56% of net funds utilised at 31 March 2007 92 valuation uplift on development projects – a further 33% of net funds committed since period end } Currently, the Company’s portfolio consists of 12 investments, comprising a total development potential of 72 p nav/share 161excluding impact of performance fees and uninvested cash million square feet } As of 31 March 2007, the investment portfolio was valued at £216 million, an increase of 74% against capital committed of £124 million million sq ft in development 72 as of 2 september 2007 . } Net Asset Value (“NAV”) per -
Proptech 3.0: the Future of Real Estate
University of Oxford Research PropTech 3.0: the future of real estate PROPTECH 3.0: THE FUTURE OF REAL ESTATE WWW.SBS.OXFORD.EDU PROPTECH 3.0: THE FUTURE OF REAL ESTATE PropTech 3.0: the future of real estate Right now, thousands of extremely clever people backed by billions of dollars of often expert investment are working very hard to change the way real estate is traded, used and operated. It would be surprising, to say the least, if this burst of activity – let’s call it PropTech 2.0 - does not lead to some significant change. No doubt many PropTech firms will fail and a lot of money will be lost, but there will be some very successful survivors who will in time have a radical impact on what has been a slow-moving, conservative industry. How, and where, will this happen? Underlying this huge capitalist and social endeavour is a clash of generations. Many of the startups are driven by, and aimed at, millennials, but they often look to babyboomers for money - and sometimes for advice. PropTech 2.0 is also engineering a much-needed boost to property market diversity. Unlike many traditional real estate businesses, PropTech is attracting a diversified pool of talent that has a strong female component, representation from different regions of the world and entrepreneurs from a highly diverse career and education background. Given the difference in background between the establishment and the drivers of the PropTech wave, it is not surprising that there is some disagreement about the level of disruption that PropTech 2.0 will create. -
Summary Overview March 2021 Patron Capital Overview
Summary Overview March 2021 Patron Capital Overview • Established European property investor over 21 years ➢ Operations across Europe with advisory offices in the UK, Luxembourg and Spain with major operating partners in most markets including in Germany, France, Poland and Portugal ➢ Experienced 70-person team including 28 investment professionals, supported by 12 advisers, with regional and product focused expertise o Average of 20 years experience across the investment team ➢ Hybrid owner operator model supporting local partners across Europe ➢ 7 Fund Vehicles closed over 21 years, raising ca. €4.3 bn from SWFs, pension plans, endowments, and charities ➢ 87 Investments closed in 16 countries ➢ Strong ESG focus, including lead donors for disabled veterans, teacher development, and recently launched a dedicated housing Fund for women suffering domestic abuse. 2 Patron Capital Fund History • Seven Funds raised over 21 years, with combined capital of over €4.3 billion, including co-invest vehicles C. £62,000,000 $109,700,000 €303,000,000 €895,000,000 €1,100,000,000 €948,632,391 (including €100,000,000 dedicated (including €143,000,000 of (with GP commitment of (C. €96,000,000) discretionary co-investment pool co-investment capital ) up to €45,000,000) and apx. €220,000,000 of co- investment capital within investments) PATRON CAPITAL PATRON CAPITAL I PATRON CAPITAL II PATRON CAPITAL III PATRON CAPITAL IV PATRON CAPITAL V CAPTIVE FUND DEDICATED FUND RAISE Pan-European value Pan-European value-oriented Pan-European value-oriented Pan-European -
Real Estate Alert’S 22Nd Annual Review of Closed- End Commingled Funds That Seek Yields of at Least 10% by Investing in Com- Mercial Real Estate
SPECIAL REPORT Fund Managers Flush With Capital, but Not Opportunities Capital, capital everywhere, but no place to invest. Number of Active Funds That’s the quandary facing managers of high-yield real estate funds. 488 466 466 By any measure, their industry is booming, with both the number of vehi- 445 427 429 425 440 cles and the amount of equity commitments at record levels. But finding suit- 415 406 able investments for all that capital is becoming harder and harder, because the long-running bull market has driven valuations sky-high. As a result, fund managers are lowering their return goals and sitting on an unprecedented hoard of uninvested capital. Those are key findings ofReal Estate Alert’s 22nd annual review of closed- end commingled funds that seek yields of at least 10% by investing in com- mercial real estate. The review identified a record 488 active vehicles, up 5% from 466 a year ago. Those funds are managed by a record 392 operators, up from the previous high of 374 last year. They have set an aggregate $339.9 billion equity goal and 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 have already raised $261.3 billion of that amount (or slightly more than three- quarters) — also new highs. But a whopping 72% of those commitments, or $186.9 billion, is still unin- vested. That tally is up 14% from a revised $164.5 billion of dry powder last Uninvested Equity ($Bil.) year and nearly double the $97.9 billion level in 2015. 187 164 The reason why is no mystery: Fund managers see fewer opportunities that 161 fit their return goals. -
GNA 2021 Merits List PCBC June 7.V2
THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS Judges Special Award for Historic Restoration The Best House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Photographer: Bernard Andre Photography / Eric Figge Photography The Starr House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Email: Sal Caruso: Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Email: Photographer: Eric Figge Photography Judges Special Award – Supportive Housing LifeMoves Mountain View Mountain View, CA Builder: XL Construction Developer: Sares Regis Group of Northern California Architect/Designer: Charles Bloszies, OCB Planner: Charles Bloszies, OCB Landscape Design: Charles Bloszies, OCB Civil Engineer: BKF Engineers Photographer: Keith Brown, Ken Rakestraw THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS CATEGORY 01 - BEST SPECIAL USE PROJECT Honeybee Discovery Center Orland, CA Architect/Designer: HMC Architects Landscape Design: Spurlock Civil Engineer: Integral Group Interior Designer: HMC Architects KLA New Amenities Building Milpitas, CA Builder: Level 10 Construction Developer: KLA Corporation Architect/Designer: Gould Evans Landscape Design: April Philips Design Works Civil Engineer: Luk and Associates Interior Designer: IA Interior Architects Photographer: Bruce Damonte Photography Pecan Square Greeting House Northlake, Texas Builder: Innovative Hardscape -
Private Equity Fundraising: Other Fund Types
Private Equity Fundraising: Other Fund Types This report is an excerpt from: Preqin Quarterly: Private Equity, Q3 2012. To download the full report please visit: https://www.preqin.com/docs/quarterly/PE/Private_Equity_Quarterly_Q3_2012.pdf Private Equity Fundraising: Other Fund Types n Q3 2012, 77 private equity funds (excluding buyout and Fig. 23: Private Equity Fundraising (Excluding Buyout and Venture Iventure capital) held fi nal closes, raising an aggregate Capital Funds) by Fund Type, Q3 2012 $46.8bn in capital commitments. This total accounted for 68% of all closed private equity funds in this period. 30 26 25 No. of Funds Aggregate capital commitments raised in Q3 2012 have Closed 20 increased by 1.6% from the $46bn in aggregate capital raised 16 by non-buyout and venture capital funds in Q2 2012. The 15 13.4 aggregate capital commitments raised in Q2 2012 represent 11 10 9.0 55.2% of the total amount raised by all private equity funds 7.5 Aggregate 6 5.9 Capital 5 5 closing in that quarter. Raised ($bn) 5 3 33.7 2.7 2 1.9 1.5 1.1 Fig. 23 shows that the fund type with the highest number of fi nal 0 closes during Q3 2012 was real estate, with 26 funds closing Other Funds Fund of of Fund on an aggregate $9bn in capital commitments. This represented Growth Natural Natural Resources Mezzanine Real Estate 19% of the total capital raised by funds closed during this period, Distressed Secondaries Infrastructure Private Equity Private excluding buyout and venture capital vehicles. -
Store Number
Store Number STORE NAME State 0788 ANCHORAGE AK 0124 BIRMINGHAM AL 0140 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA AL 0724 HUNTSVILLE AL 0132 PINNACLE HILLS AR 0488 LITTLE ROCK AR 0016 BILTMORE AZ 0094 ARROWHEAD AZ 0168 SAN TAN VILLAGE AZ 0288 CHANDLER AZ 0364 SCOTTSDALE AZ 0480 TUCSON AZ 0736 THE QUARTER AZ 0926 PARK PLACE AZ 1258 DANA PARK AZ 1308 NORTERRA AZ 0026 SANTA MONICA CA 0028 HILLSDALE CA 0030 ANAHEIM CA 0032 HOLLYWOOD & HIGHLAND CA 0034 PASADENA CA 0036 FASHION VALLEY CA 0038 UNIVERSITY TOWNE CENTER CA 0048 STANFORD CA 0052 BURLINGAME CA 0058 POWELL STREET CA 0078 CENTURY CITY CA 0082 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 0088 FRESNO FASHION FAIR CA 0090 SANTA BARBARA CA 0104 BAKERSFIELD CA 0116 EMERYVILLE CA 0196 UNION STREET CA 0202 WALNUT CREEK CA 0206 NOVATO CA 0232 OTAY RANCH CA 0382 EMBARCADERO CA 0438 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 0462 PACIFIC COMMONS CA 0484 MODESTO CA 0494 TEMECULA CA 0614 CALABASAS CA 0646 VALENCIA CA 0672 AMERICANA CA 0674 PALM DESERT CA 0740 MALIBU CA 0914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 0922 MARINA DEL REY CA 0928 BEVERLY DRIVE CA 0934 MONTEREY CA 0938 WESTLAKE CA 0946 THE GROVE CA 0958 SANTANA ROW CA 1118 RIVER PARK CA 1128 CORTE MADERA TOWN CENTER CA 1134 CONCORD CA 1138 UNIVERSAL CITY WALK CA 1144 STUDIO CITY CA 1150 CHINO HILLS CA 1158 TUSTIN MARKET PLACE CA 1166 PACIFIC PALISADES CA 1168 LAUREL VILLAGE CA 1172 DALY CITY CA 1176 ALISO VILLAGE CA 1190 FOLSOM CA 1192 SANTEE CA 1200 BERKELEY CA 1202 SAN FRANCISCO CENTRE CA 1218 PALM SPRINGS CA 1222 ONE PASEO CA 1230 IRVINE SPECTRUM CA 1236 REDLANDS CA 1240 BISHOP RANCH CA 1250 LONG BEACH CA 1268 SHOPPES AT -
Comments Responses Rtc-1002
COMMENTS RESPONSES 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 LAUREL L. IMPETT, AICP T: 415 552-7272 F: 415 552-5816 Urban Planner www.smwlaw.com [email protected] July 17, 2012 Via Email Mayor Jerry Sanders and Members of the City Council City of San Diego City Administration Building 202 “C” Street San Diego, California 92101 [email protected] [email protected] Re: One Paseo Draft EIR Dear Mayor Sanders and Members of the City Council: On behalf of Cleveland National Forest Foundation (“CNFF”), we have reviewed the draft environmental impact report (“EIR”) for One Paseo, a massive mixed-use development project consisting of almost two million square feet of retail, office, residential and open space uses. If this Project were proposed in an urban area with convenient access to transit service, it 326.1 As discussed in responses to comments 4.1 and 10.40, the proposed would be considered “smart growth.” Yet because the Carmel Valley currently has no access to project is considered consistent with the City of Villages Strategy, which 326.1 convenient transit and because transit service is not contemplated to serve the Project until at least 2035, it is decidedly not a “smart growth” project. embraces the principles of smart growth. The project site is identified as having a moderate “Village Propensity” (see Figure LU-1 of the General Moreover, One Paseo would exacerbate already excessive levels of traffic Plan). As also discussed in response to comment 10.40, transit is planned 326.2 congestion on local and regional streets, intersections, freeways and freeway ramps. -
Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: Sam Schwartz Engineering and CHS Consulting Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Final Report Street Design Improvement Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Introduction and Study Background .......................................................................................................... I‐1 Study Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... I‐1 Overall Approach ..................................................................................................................................... I‐2 Initial Screening Stages and Results ......................................................................................................... II‐1 Initial corridor selection (108) ............................................................................................................... II‐1 Refined List of Candidate Corridors (43 Corridors) .............................................................................. -
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT of NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J
Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 49 Market St. Morristown, NJ 07960 Mark E. Hall, Esq. Martha B. Chovanes, Esq. Michael R. Herz, Esq. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: (973) 992-4800 Facsimile: (973) 992-9125 Proposed Counsel for L’Occitane, Inc. In Re: Chapter 11 L’OCCITANE, INC., Case No. 21-10632 Debtor. Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan Objections Due: February 26, 2021 NOTICE OF DEBTOR’S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP AS BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL TO THE DEBTOR NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 12, 2021, L’Occitane, Inc., debtor and debtor in possession (the “Debtor”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 case (the “Chapter 11 Case”) filed its application (the “Application”) pursuant to section 327(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rules 2014 and 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 2014-1 of the District of New Jersey Local Bankruptcy Rules (the “Local Rules”) for entry of an order authorizing and approving the Active\119547284.v1-2/12/21 Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 2 employment and retention of Fox Rothschild LLP (“Fox”) as attorneys to the Debtor in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date.1 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that objections, if any, to the relief requested must be made in writing and in the form prescribed by the Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 2014-1, and must be filed with this Court and served upon and received by proposed counsel to the Debtor at Fox Rothschild LLP, 49 Market Street, Morristown, NJ 07960 (Attn: Mark E.