DOCSLIB.ORG

Claremont Planning Commission Meeting Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claremont Planning Commission Meeting Agenda CLAREMONT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA City Council Chamber Tuesday 225 Second Street April 04, 2017 Claremont, CA 91711 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS RICHARD ROSENBLUTH CHAIR RICK REED JAMES JACKSON CYNTHIA HUMES K.M. WILLIAMSON DOUGLAS LYON LEIGH ANNE JONES CALL TO ORDER THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT CALENDAR Routine Administrative Items 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 17, 2017 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and file the regular Planning Commission meeting minutes of January 17, 2017. Attachment(s): Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 17, 2017 2. SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - COMMISSION WORKSHOP OF MARCH 15, 2017 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the Special Meeting minutes of March 15, 2017. Attachment(s): Special Meeting Minutes - Commissioner Workshop of March 15, 2017 PUBLIC HEARINGS Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda April 4, 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 3. CLAREMONT HERITAGE PRESENTATION ON UPDATING HISTORIC REGISTER - ORAL REPORT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the presentation. 4. SPECIFIC PLAN FOR VILLAGE SOUTH AREA - UPDATE ON CONSULTANT SELECTION AND PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the presentation. Attachment(s): City Council Staff Report and Attachments Dated March 28, 2017 5. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT - FOLLOW-UP FROM THE MARCH 15, 2017 COMMISSIONER WORKSHOP - ORAL REPORT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue their discussion regarding the local CEQA Guideline review. REPORTS Commission Mayor/Chair Meeting Commissioner Comments Staff Briefing on Council Meetings Briefing on Other Items Upcoming Agendas and Events ADJOURNMENT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAREMONT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE HELD ON, APRIL 18, 2017 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CLAREMONT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER, 225 SECOND STREET. MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA, AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE AGENDA, ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT 207 HARVARD AVENUE, CLAREMONT, MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, 7 AM – 6 PM. SUBJECT MATERIALS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE - www.ci.claremont.ca.us. For more information, please call the City Clerk’s Office at 909-399-5461. Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda April 4, 2017 IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 0F 1990, THIS AGENDA WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE FORMATS TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO REQUIRES A MODIFICATION OR ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN A CITY MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY CLERK AT 909-399-5461 “VOICE” OR 1-800-735-2929 “TT/TTY” AT LEAST THREE (3) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING, IF POSSIBLE. I, KIM WOLFINBARGER, SR. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING AGENDA WAS POSTED AT CLAREMONT CITY HALL, 207 HARVARD AVENUE, ON MARCH 30, 2017 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2. ANY ITEMS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN INITIATED BY 10:00 P.M. WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FURTHER, ANY ITEM INITIATED BEFORE 10:00 P.M. ON WHICH A CONCLUSION HAS NOT BEEN REACHED BY 10:15 P.M. WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. POST THROUGH: APRIL 5, 2017 225 Second Street Claremont Planning Commission Claremont, CA 91711 Agenda Report File #: 1852 Item No: 1. TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: BRIAN DESATNIK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: APRIL 4, 2017 Reviewed by: Finance Director: N/A SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 17, 2017 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and file the regular Planning Commission meeting minutes of January 17, 2017. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies are available at the City Hall public counter, the Youth Activity Center, the Alexander Hughes Community Center, the City website, and the Claremont Public Library. Submitted by: Prepared by: Brian Desatnik Kim Wolfinbarger Director of Community Development Senior Administrative Assistant Attachment: Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 17, 2017 CLAREMONT Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/30/2017 powered by Legistar™ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 17, 2017 – 7 p.m. City Council Chamber 225 W. Second Street, Claremont, California CALL TO ORDER Chair Rosenbluth called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Humes, Jackson, Jones, Lyon, Reed, Rosenbluth, and Williamson ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT Director of Community Development Brian Desatnik; Assistant Planner Elaine Yang; and, Sr. Administrative Assistant Kim Wolfinbarger CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no ceremonial matters, presentations, or announcements. PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Rosenbluth invited public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. CONSENT CALENDAR Written Communications Routine Administrative Items 1. Planning Commission Minutes of December 6, and December 20, 2016 Chair Rosenbluth opened public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. Commissioners requested the following change to the December 6 minutes: The first sentence on page 6 should be revised from, “but feels that people that use park their cars in,” to “but feels that people that usually park their cars in.” Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2017 Page 2 Commissioner Lyon moved to approve the minutes of the December 6, 2016, meeting with the change noted above; seconded by Commissioner Jackson; and carried on a vote as follows: AYES: Humes, Jackson, Jones, Lyon, Reed, Rosenbluth, and Williamson NOES: None Commissioners requested the following changes to the December 20, 2016 meeting minutes: The first paragraph on page 5 should be revised from, “The old, not very attractive addition… The old library windows and the curved wall are exposed….. He is however disappointed with the elimination of the hallway with the pictures on it….” to “The good news is that the old, not very attractive addition… The old library windows and the curved wall are again visible….. He is however disappointed with the elimination of the hallway with the historical pictures of Claremont on it…” The first sentence on page 7 should be revised from, “..capacity on patio; e) usual weekend wait time; f) vacant space next to the restaurant; g) service times.” to “capacity on patio; e) usual weekend wait time; f) vacant space next to the restaurant; and, g) service times.” The third paragraph on page 7 should be revised from, “…to 900-square feet because the four-foot ….” to “… to 900-square feet because the area is approximately six feet by 60 feet, and the four-foot ...” The fifth paragraph on page 7 should be revised from, “…you don’t want to restrict the number than…. He doesn’t see that ...” to “…you don’t want to restrict the number that.... He doesn’t see that…” The fifth paragraph on page 8 should be revised from, “…18 years of age or order, and shall … in the same area as pint of sale of alcoholic beverages.” to “…18 years of age or older, and if not of legal drinking age shall… in the same areas as point of sale of alcoholic beverages.” The motion on page 10 should be revised from, “…Section B-1, with approximately 12 to 15 small tables…” to “...Section B-1, with up to 15 small tables…” Commissioner Lyon asked for clarification on what would classify as a “change of scope in the services offered” on Page 6, Section D-16, of the Viva Madrid resolution. Director Desatnik said that the phrase refers to any service outside of a restaurant use service. Commissioner Jackson asked if the applicant decided on the final number of tables it will have. Director Desatnik said that there will be between 12-15 tables. Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2017 Page 3 Chair Rosenbluth noted that by approving the revision of the motion on the minutes, the Commission will be approving the number of tables to be up to 15, leaving the applicant the ability to choose the final number of tables. Commissioner Jackson asked staff what the linear footage will encompass. Chair Rosenbluth indicated that there is 60 x 6 linear feet within the 360 square feet of the project. Commissioner Williamson moved to approve the minutes of the December 20, 2016 minutes, with the changes noted above; seconded by Commissioner Reed; and carried on a vote as follows: AYES: Jackson, Lyon, Reed, Rosenbluth, and Williamson NOES: None ABSTAIN: Humes and Jones PUBLIC HEARING 2. Conditional Use Permit (File #16-C22), Request to Allow Ancillary Massage Therapy Services at Existing Spa Business (Dermagarden) Located Within the Claremont Village Expansion Area (101 N. Indian Hill Boulevard, Suite #C2-200). Applicant – Jonathon Tolkin on Behalf of Claremont Village Expansion, LLC Director Desatnik introduced and gave a brief background on the newest addition to the Community Development Department, Assistant Planner Elaine Yang, after which Ms. Yang provided corrections to the proposed resolution noting that the proposed ancillary massage services are in conjunction with a spa business, gave a PowerPoint presentation, and addressed a Commissioner question regarding a previously existing spa business in the area. The Planning Commission was then asked to adopt the proposed resolution, approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) #16-C22. The resolution allows the addition of massage therapy services in conjunction with a spa business at 101 N. Indian Hill Boulevard, Suite #C2-200, subject to the findings set in Section 16.303.040 of the Claremont Municipal Code (CMC), and conditions listed in the draft resolution. Chair Rosenbluth asked the applicant to make a presentation. David Esqueda, partner and co-owner of Dermagarden, thanked the Commission for the opportunity to submit their application and do business in Claremont.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GNA 2021 Merits List PCBC June 7.V2
    THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS Judges Special Award for Historic Restoration The Best House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Photographer: Bernard Andre Photography / Eric Figge Photography The Starr House Fremont, CA Builder: Robson Homes Developer: Robson Homes Architect: Sal Caruso, Salvatore Caruso Design Corporation Email: Sal Caruso: Interior Designer: Marie Peterson, Chelsea Court Designs Email: Photographer: Eric Figge Photography Judges Special Award – Supportive Housing LifeMoves Mountain View Mountain View, CA Builder: XL Construction Developer: Sares Regis Group of Northern California Architect/Designer: Charles Bloszies, OCB Planner: Charles Bloszies, OCB Landscape Design: Charles Bloszies, OCB Civil Engineer: BKF Engineers Photographer: Keith Brown, Ken Rakestraw THE ART OF DESIGN GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERITS CATEGORY 01 - BEST SPECIAL USE PROJECT Honeybee Discovery Center Orland, CA Architect/Designer: HMC Architects Landscape Design: Spurlock Civil Engineer: Integral Group Interior Designer: HMC Architects KLA New Amenities Building Milpitas, CA Builder: Level 10 Construction Developer: KLA Corporation Architect/Designer: Gould Evans Landscape Design: April Philips Design Works Civil Engineer: Luk and Associates Interior Designer: IA Interior Architects Photographer: Bruce Damonte Photography Pecan Square Greeting House Northlake, Texas Builder: Innovative Hardscape
    [Show full text]
  • Store Number
    Store Number STORE NAME State 0788 ANCHORAGE AK 0124 BIRMINGHAM AL 0140 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA AL 0724 HUNTSVILLE AL 0132 PINNACLE HILLS AR 0488 LITTLE ROCK AR 0016 BILTMORE AZ 0094 ARROWHEAD AZ 0168 SAN TAN VILLAGE AZ 0288 CHANDLER AZ 0364 SCOTTSDALE AZ 0480 TUCSON AZ 0736 THE QUARTER AZ 0926 PARK PLACE AZ 1258 DANA PARK AZ 1308 NORTERRA AZ 0026 SANTA MONICA CA 0028 HILLSDALE CA 0030 ANAHEIM CA 0032 HOLLYWOOD & HIGHLAND CA 0034 PASADENA CA 0036 FASHION VALLEY CA 0038 UNIVERSITY TOWNE CENTER CA 0048 STANFORD CA 0052 BURLINGAME CA 0058 POWELL STREET CA 0078 CENTURY CITY CA 0082 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 0088 FRESNO FASHION FAIR CA 0090 SANTA BARBARA CA 0104 BAKERSFIELD CA 0116 EMERYVILLE CA 0196 UNION STREET CA 0202 WALNUT CREEK CA 0206 NOVATO CA 0232 OTAY RANCH CA 0382 EMBARCADERO CA 0438 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 0462 PACIFIC COMMONS CA 0484 MODESTO CA 0494 TEMECULA CA 0614 CALABASAS CA 0646 VALENCIA CA 0672 AMERICANA CA 0674 PALM DESERT CA 0740 MALIBU CA 0914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 0922 MARINA DEL REY CA 0928 BEVERLY DRIVE CA 0934 MONTEREY CA 0938 WESTLAKE CA 0946 THE GROVE CA 0958 SANTANA ROW CA 1118 RIVER PARK CA 1128 CORTE MADERA TOWN CENTER CA 1134 CONCORD CA 1138 UNIVERSAL CITY WALK CA 1144 STUDIO CITY CA 1150 CHINO HILLS CA 1158 TUSTIN MARKET PLACE CA 1166 PACIFIC PALISADES CA 1168 LAUREL VILLAGE CA 1172 DALY CITY CA 1176 ALISO VILLAGE CA 1190 FOLSOM CA 1192 SANTEE CA 1200 BERKELEY CA 1202 SAN FRANCISCO CENTRE CA 1218 PALM SPRINGS CA 1222 ONE PASEO CA 1230 IRVINE SPECTRUM CA 1236 REDLANDS CA 1240 BISHOP RANCH CA 1250 LONG BEACH CA 1268 SHOPPES AT
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Appraisal
    APPRAISAL REPORT 70-UNIT PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING (PSH) PROJECT Anaheim, California _______________________________________________ APPRAISAL REPORT 70-UNIT PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING (PSH) PROJECT Anaheim, California ___________________________________________ SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY: TLP * REALTY ADVISORS 30497 Canwood Street, Suite 201 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Telephone 818-851-9474 Email: [email protected] Web: www.TLPRA.com File No.: 20-224 DATES OF VALUE: March 1, 2020 - Fee Simple Market Value As Is May 1, 2021 - Leased Fee PMVCC November 1, 2021 - Leased Fee PMVSO DATE OF REPORT: July 9, 2020 July 9, 2020 RE: In accordance with your request, we have made an examination of the above-referenced property, for the purpose of estimating the requested market value estimates of the property and the proposed improvements. Specifically requested, and provided in this report are the following value scenarios: VALUE CONCLUSIONS NO.VALUE PREMISE COMMENT 1 Fee Simple Market Value As Is Vacant - 70 Unit Motel 2 Leased Fee PMVCC - Restricted Rents Trending Considered 3 Leased Fee PMVSO - Restricted Rents Trending Considered 4 Hypothetical Leased Fee PMVSO - Market Rents Trending Considered and accounting for un- subordinated rents, if any 5 Market Value LIHTCs - Low Income Housing Tax Credits (RD) 6 Insurable Cost Estimate 7 Leased Fee PMVSO - Restricted Rents No Trending 8 Leased Fee Market Value NPV of subsidy rent over term of contract (15 years) 9 Leased Fee Market Value De Control Value With Tax Exemption 10 Leased Fee Market Value De Control Value Without Tax Exemption 11 Hypothetical Leased Fee PMVSO - Market Rents No Trending Definition of Appraisal Assignment and Report Format This appraisal has been prepared under the CCRC appraisal Guidelines and it has been completed in conformance with the requirements of the Appraisal Foundation's, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP and the written report options of USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(a) and Title XI of FIRREA.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments Responses Rtc-1002
    COMMENTS RESPONSES 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 LAUREL L. IMPETT, AICP T: 415 552-7272 F: 415 552-5816 Urban Planner www.smwlaw.com [email protected] July 17, 2012 Via Email Mayor Jerry Sanders and Members of the City Council City of San Diego City Administration Building 202 “C” Street San Diego, California 92101 [email protected] [email protected] Re: One Paseo Draft EIR Dear Mayor Sanders and Members of the City Council: On behalf of Cleveland National Forest Foundation (“CNFF”), we have reviewed the draft environmental impact report (“EIR”) for One Paseo, a massive mixed-use development project consisting of almost two million square feet of retail, office, residential and open space uses. If this Project were proposed in an urban area with convenient access to transit service, it 326.1 As discussed in responses to comments 4.1 and 10.40, the proposed would be considered “smart growth.” Yet because the Carmel Valley currently has no access to project is considered consistent with the City of Villages Strategy, which 326.1 convenient transit and because transit service is not contemplated to serve the Project until at least 2035, it is decidedly not a “smart growth” project. embraces the principles of smart growth. The project site is identified as having a moderate “Village Propensity” (see Figure LU-1 of the General Moreover, One Paseo would exacerbate already excessive levels of traffic Plan). As also discussed in response to comment 10.40, transit is planned 326.2 congestion on local and regional streets, intersections, freeways and freeway ramps.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: Sam Schwartz Engineering and CHS Consulting Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Final Report Street Design Improvement Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Introduction and Study Background .......................................................................................................... I‐1 Study Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... I‐1 Overall Approach ..................................................................................................................................... I‐2 Initial Screening Stages and Results ......................................................................................................... II‐1 Initial corridor selection (108) ............................................................................................................... II‐1 Refined List of Candidate Corridors (43 Corridors) ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT of NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J
    Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 49 Market St. Morristown, NJ 07960 Mark E. Hall, Esq. Martha B. Chovanes, Esq. Michael R. Herz, Esq. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: (973) 992-4800 Facsimile: (973) 992-9125 Proposed Counsel for L’Occitane, Inc. In Re: Chapter 11 L’OCCITANE, INC., Case No. 21-10632 Debtor. Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan Objections Due: February 26, 2021 NOTICE OF DEBTOR’S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP AS BANKRUPTCY COUNSEL TO THE DEBTOR NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 12, 2021, L’Occitane, Inc., debtor and debtor in possession (the “Debtor”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 case (the “Chapter 11 Case”) filed its application (the “Application”) pursuant to section 327(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rules 2014 and 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and Rule 2014-1 of the District of New Jersey Local Bankruptcy Rules (the “Local Rules”) for entry of an order authorizing and approving the Active\119547284.v1-2/12/21 Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 106 Filed 02/12/21 Entered 02/12/21 17:58:29 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 2 employment and retention of Fox Rothschild LLP (“Fox”) as attorneys to the Debtor in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date.1 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that objections, if any, to the relief requested must be made in writing and in the form prescribed by the Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 2014-1, and must be filed with this Court and served upon and received by proposed counsel to the Debtor at Fox Rothschild LLP, 49 Market Street, Morristown, NJ 07960 (Attn: Mark E.
    [Show full text]
  • Contractor List
    Active Licenses DBA Name Full Primary Address Work Phone # Licensee Category SIC Description buslicBL‐3205002/ 28/2020 1 ON 1 TECHNOLOGY 417 S ASSOCIATED RD #185 cntr Electrical Work BREA CA 92821 buslicBL‐1684702/ 28/2020 1ST CHOICE ROOFING 1645 SEPULVEDA BLVD (310) 251‐8662 subc Roofing, Siding, and Sheet Met UNIT 11 TORRANCE CA 90501 buslicBL‐3214602/ 28/2021 1ST CLASS MECHANICAL INC 5505 STEVENS WAY (619) 560‐1773 subc Plumbing, Heating, and Air‐Con #741996 SAN DIEGO CA 92114 buslicBL‐1617902/ 28/2021 2‐H CONSTRUCTION, INC 2651 WALNUT AVE (562) 424‐5567 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia SIGNAL HILL CA 90755‐1830 buslicBL‐3086102/ 28/2021 200 PSI FIRE PROTECTION CO 15901 S MAIN ST (213) 763‐0612 subc Special Trade Contractors, NEC GARDENA CA 90248‐2550 buslicBL‐0778402/ 28/2021 20TH CENTURY AIR, INC. 6695 E CANYON HILLS RD (714) 514‐9426 subc Plumbing, Heating, and Air‐Con ANAHEIM CA 92807 buslicBL‐2778302/ 28/2020 3 A ROOFING 762 HUDSON AVE (714) 785‐7378 subc Roofing, Siding, and Sheet Met COSTA MESA CA 92626 buslicBL‐2864402/ 28/2018 3 N 1 ELECTRIC INC 2051 S BAKER AVE (909) 287‐9468 cntr Electrical Work ONTARIO CA 91761 buslicBL‐3137402/ 28/2021 365 CONSTRUCTION 84 MERIDIAN ST (626) 599‐2002 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia IRWINDALE CA 91010 buslicBL‐3096502/ 28/2019 3M POOLS 1094 DOUGLASS DR (909) 630‐4300 cntr Special Trade Contractors, NEC POMONA CA 91768 buslicBL‐3104202/ 28/2019 5M CONTRACTING INC 2691 DOW AVE (714) 730‐6760 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia UNIT C‐2 TUSTIN CA 92780 buslicBL‐2201302/ 28/2020 7 STAR TECH 2047 LOMITA BLVD (310) 528‐8191 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia LOMITA CA 90717 buslicBL‐3156502/ 28/2019 777 PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION 1027 4TH AVE subc Painting and Paper Hanging LOS ANGELES CA 90019 buslicBL‐1920202/ 28/2020 A & A DOOR 10519 MEADOW RD (213) 703‐8240 cntr General Contractors‐Residentia NORWALK CA 90650‐8010 buslicBL‐2285002/ 28/2021 A & A HENINS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003
    Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Evergreen-Eastridge Plan NOVEMBER 2003 Knight Program in Community Building University of Miami School of Architecture Charrette Team Members University of Miami Faculty Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, Dean Charles C. Bohl, Knight Program Director Jaime Correa, Professor in Community Building Knight Program Fellows Lester Abberger, Tom Borrup, Joyce Crosthwaite, Bill Gietema, Gloria Katz, Barbara Marshman, Neal Payton, Milt Rhodes, Kofi Sefa-Boakye, Arnold Spokane, Peter Swift, Laurie Volk Student Team Members The University of Miamiʼs 2002-2003 Suburb & Town Design Graduate Class and S. Mallick, T. Niyaomwan and M. Wiranta of San Jose State Universityʼs Planning Program Urban Design Consultant Daniel Parolek Graphic Design Russell Preston and Malik Benjamin, Knight Program Scholars Sponsors City of San Jose San Jose Redevelopment Agency Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group The San Jose Mercury News Viet Mercury Nuevo Mundo Knight Program in Community Building Thanks also to ADAPTEC and Cadence Design Systems Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 A. Overview of the Charrette Process 4 B. History & Regional Context of the Evergreen-Eastridge Area 5 C. Goals and Objectives 6 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 A. Regional Context 7 B. Environmental Setting 8 C. Transportation 9 D. Social Environment 10 E. Housing 11 F. Economic and Real Estate Context 12 G. Urban Form 13 H. Master Plan 15 IV. THE MASTER PLAN 16 A. Ideas Explored During the Charrette Process 16 B. Market Analysis 18 C. Town Plan 21 D. Transportation 28 E. Building Types 32 V. IMPLEMENTATION 34 A. Urban Design Guidelines 34 VI. COMMUNITY BUILDING STRATEGIES 35 A.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide
    SAN DIEGO Cushman & Wakefield Global Cities Retail Guide Cushman & Wakefield | San Diego | 2019 0 Sun, surf and scenery define San Diego. Situated in the southernmost corner of California’s coastline, the city is set apart by a nearly ideal climate, 70 miles of coastline, vibrant nightlife, and diverse food culture — all of which contribute to its eclectic retail offerings. Those, combined with family-oriented recreation, luxurious accommodations around the county, and world-class arts and culture have made the city one of the top ten travel destinations in the United States, according to US News and World Reports. Named by National Geographic as one of the “World’s Smart Cities”, San Diego offers much more than off-duty fun. World-renowned academic institutions, research consortiums and innovation incubators also define the culture. The city is home to a number of major corporate headquarters and has a competitive stronghold in software, biotechnology and life sciences, aerospace and maritime technologies, healthcare, action sports and telecommunications. These industries, coupled with San Diego’s diverse residential base and steady stream of domestic and international tourists, generate demand for a wide array of retail products and services and create a distinctive retail environment. SAN DIEGO San Diego is the launching pad for many new food concepts, independent eateries and restaurant chains. OVERVIEW The vitality of the Food & Beverage sector is not surprising given the state’s abundance of agricultural products and proximity to innovative and celebrated chefs. Cushman & Wakefield | San Diego | 2019 1 SAN DIEGO KEY RETAIL STREETS & AREAS DOWNTOWN LA JOLLA / UTC Downtown has grown to encompass distinctive La Jolla is a prosperous coastal community within San neighborhoods, including: Little Italy, Cortez Hill, Columbia Diego County, located approximately 12 miles north of District, Marina District, Gaslamp Quarter and East Downtown San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Protests Proposed Fee
    DH Bulletin VOLUME 14, NO 177 www.csudhbulletin.com MAY 7, 2014 Students protests proposed fee University President Willie Hagan addresses students’ concerns, but “never answered our questions,” SQE members say. By Chad Arias on campus. State University Dominguez Hills natures. To date, this petition has termining whether the fee should Staff Writer The first protest took place in administrators. not had any affect on the Student be implemented. front of President Willie Hagan’s The anti-fee petition was Success Fee proposed policy, While waiting outside of A string of protests against office. Students toted signs asking started by the Students for Qual- SQE members say. Hagan’s office for more than an the proposed Student Success Fee why the fee-hike petition hasn’t ity Education organization and Students are also upset that have been staged in the last week been acknowledged by California has amassed more than 1,600 sig- there was no voting process in de- See PROTEST: page 19 EOP to hold its own annual Rediscovering graduation celebration Students will be able to highlight their path to Spain graduation despite their Professor discovers he’s actually obstacles. passionate about his country of origin despite growing up with By Faith Egbuonu Staff Writer different feelings. For the first time Dominguez Hills will honor Educational Op- portunity Program students with its own graduation celebration. By Tania Torres • Staff Writer EOP’s goal for a separate Benito Gomez not only teaches Spanish, he also makes graduation event is to provide sure every student knows Spain’s history. “special recognition” that isn’t possible for them to receive dur- ing the traditional commence- enito Gómez has been intrigued by different cultures ever When Gómez graduated with a bachelor’s degree in educa- ment “due to its size,” said Paz since he can remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Trends Quarterly, Sales Volume and Pricing Are Starting to Decline
    Second Quarter 2008 Report Investment Trends Vol. 4, No. 2 Quarterly Spotlight on Portland Sponsored by: InThisVolume Now Available! National Overview Caught in the Storm Economic Background & Investment Environment A Focus on Real Estate Cap Rate & Yield Rate Expectations Seeking Shelter from the Storm Effect on Real Estate National Market Analysis & Property Sector Highlights “Sustainable Development Shapes Portland Past and Future” Contributors Scope & Methodology Regional and Metro-Level Analyses Coming Soon! East Region Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte, Hartford, Norfolk, Northern New Jersey, New York City, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Raleigh, Richmond, Washington, D.C. South Region Atlanta, Austin, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Houston, Memphis, Miami, Nashville, New Orleans/Baton Rouge, Oklahoma City, Orlando, San Antonio, Tampa Midwest Region Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Omaha, St. Louis, Toledo West Region Denver, Honolulu, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Tucson Investment Trends Copyright© 2008 by Real Estate Research Corporation (RERC) and the CCIM Institute. Quarterly Foreword April 2008 Dear Readers, Property fundamentals for commercial real estate are beginning to reflect the new economic and capital market storm we find ourselves in. Vacancies are up for all property types on a national level, and as noted in the second quarter 2008 RERC/CCIM Investment Trends Quarterly, sales volume and pricing are starting to decline. What’s more, the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) forecasts that until confidence levels return, commercial real estate investment will remain as much as 40 percent below transaction levels seen in 2007, when a record $427.2 billion of commercial real estate traded hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Undergraduate Diploma in TESOL
    Undergra duate Diploma in TESOL January 1 – December 31, 2021 ANAHEIM UNIVERSITY MISSION Anaheim University was established as a unique, innovative and sustainable institution of higher learning to meet the educational needs of a diverse and global student body through academic programs of the highest quality. Dedicated to a student-centered philosophy, Anaheim University makes higher education accessible to qualified students worldwide through both online and on-campus study. ANAHEIM UNIVERSITY OBJECTIVES Taking advantage of the newest technological innovations, Anaheim University is designed to be a sustainable global institution with a multicultural perspective, with programs designed to meet the needs of its diverse student population. To accomplish this, Anaheim University has the following objectives: ● Meeting the educational needs of our students by offering instructional programs otherwise unavailable because of access, cost, or work schedule ● Excellence of academic instruction through the guidance and expertise of dedicated faculty ● Provision of an instructional environment where students can take an active role in their own learning ● Utilization of the newest technologies ● Deployment of technology-based learning resources ● Development of interactive learning environments in both synchronous and asynchronous settings ● Support of an academic environment where professors are able to deliver the highest quality educational programs and take advantage of the University’s learning resources ● Regular course and program assessments and evaluation to improve our offerings ● Development and maintenance of a University alumni support system to advance alumni professional skills, knowledge, and expertise and help them realize their lifelong educational goals ● Development of University culture and programs promoting sustainability ABOUT US Anaheim University is a private institution that was founded in Orange County, California in 1996.
    [Show full text]