DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Canada (Ontario) in 1791, Upper Canada Had a Population of About Upper and Lower Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Canada (Ontario) in 1791, Upper Canada Had a Population of About Upper and Lower Canada assembly, was appointed in every province. Until important reforms. The main changes, however, A BRIEF HISTORY OF CANADA 1848, when London agreed to grant responsible would be imposed by the London authorities 1763-1860 government to the Province of Canada, the when they adopted many of the Executive Council was answerable to London recommendations in the report drafted by Lord rather than to the House of Assembly. Durham after the rebellions of 1837 and 1838 in Upper Canada (Ontario) In 1791, Upper Canada had a population of about Upper and Lower Canada. One such 10 000 people. Most inhabitants were United recommendation led to the Act of Union of 1841, Empire Loyalists who profited substantially from which marked the end of Upper Canada and the From the Constitutional Act (1791) to the London's generosity. During the War of beginning of a new political era, that of United Act of Union Independence (1776-1783), subjects who wished Canada. (1841) to remain loyal to England left what would later become the United States to settle in Nova Scotia, The 1837 Rebellions Upper Canada, the New Brunswick and the Province of Quebec precursor of modern- (modern-day Quebec and Ontario). At that time, In Upper Canada (as in Lower Canada), part of the day Ontario, was Upper Canada also had significant Francophone population was critical of how the political elite created by the and Aboriginal populations. governed the colony. Matters of contention Constitutional Act of included political patronage, policies on 1791, which divided The first lieutenant-governor of Upper Canada, education, the economy and land grants the former Province John Graves Simcoe, played an important role in (particularly clergy reserves) and the favouritism of Quebec into two establishing Upper Canadian society. He wanted shown to the Anglican Church. parts: Upper Canada to model the new territory on his native England The reformers took control of the House of and Lower Canada. and institute Anglicanism as the state religion. The Assembly in 1828 and in 1834, but were unable to These two provinces American invasion of Canada during the War of effect the desired changes. The arrival of were joined once 1812 was also crucial to defining the Upper Lieutenant-Governor Francis Bond Head, meant to again to form the Canadian identity. By taking up arms against the win over the reformers, did not achieve the new republic, the former American settlers -- Province of Canada in expected outcome. Head adopted a who made up a large part of Upper Canada's 1840 and were then Copyright/Source confrontational attitude and helped elect referred to as Canada population -- strengthened their existing ties to Conservatives. Moderate reformers like Robert West (Upper Canada, or Ontario) and Canada East England. Baldwin were defeated as a result. This played in (Lower Canada, or Quebec). The terms "Upper The Family Compact that had governed the favour of William Lyon Mackenzie and his more Canada" and "Lower Canada," in the Canadian province since the early 19th century became a radical approach. historical context, therefore refer to the period point of growing dissension in the 1820s. The between 1791 and 1841. Much of the heritage of contention culminated in the 1837 rebellions, led Initially, W. L. Mackenzie wanted to pressure the the Ontario we know today can be traced to this by William Lyon Mackenzie. Although they failed, colonial authorities and government by urging a Upper Canada period. the rebellions proved that the general population boycott of imported goods, encouraging political did not share the Family Compact's vision of unions and associating with reformers from Lower The Constitutional Act of 1791 was London's society. Influential men such as Robert Baldwin Canada. In late summer 1837, however, he answer to the American Revolution with regard to and Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine -- who led a abandoned non-violent tactics and turned the administration of its North American colonies. coalition government on two separate occasions increasingly toward armed revolt. In early A lieutenant-governor, assisted by an executive (1841-43 and 1848-51) in the decade following the December 1837, W. L. Mackenzie and nearly 1000 council, a legislative council and a house of Act of Union of 1841 -- introduced a number of men met at Montgomery's Tavern in Toronto to attempt to overthrow the government. Between America. The Durham Report was therefore not a Sydenham's policy of blocking Executive Council 200 and 300 volunteers and militiamen, whom the threat to Upper Canada, quite the contrary. It was access to Francophones, Baldwin and La Fontaine government had won over to its cause, drove back thus not surprising that Upper Canada should formed the country's first coalition government. the rebels. Three days later, between 1000 and welcome the report, while it met with an angry This brief period of relative independence in 1500 Loyalists marched on the tavern and forced outcry by the French-speaking population, United Canada ended when Governor Bagot died the rebels to flee. The rebellion was almost over. primarily in Lower Canada. in 1843 and was replaced by Charles Metcalfe. A few skirmishes broke out in 1838, but none Governor Metcalfe firmly intended to put the posed much threat to the government. The people of Lower Canada protested against the reformers in their place, making co-operation Durham Report's drastic measures so loudly that between the two halves of the colony more The Durham Report and the Act of Union in 1848, seven years after the Act of Union came difficult. into effect, London was forced to recognize and Lord Durham was sent to Canada to report on the accept the use of French. The Durham Report also But Baldwin and La Fontaine were again called to reasons for the rebellions in Upper and Lower created a new political class -- moderate form a coalition government from 1848 to 1851. Canada. reformers who believed in co-operation between The "Great Ministry," as it was called, would His report contained three main Canada's two main groups at the time. In Canada contribute substantially to the legal and municipal recommendations: that responsible government West, there would be Robert Baldwin; in Canada system in United Canada. The coalition be granted to the British North American colonies; East, there would be Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine. government also adopted a number of important that Upper and Lower Canada be amalgamated to reforms that would change the colony's political form a united Province of Canada; and that French The Baldwin-La Fontaine Governments and social landscape. Canadians be assimilated. He also openly criticized the political cliques that controlled government In the election of 1841, the first under the Union, Ministerial Responsibility power in both colonies. London did what it could to favour Conservative candidates. In Canada West, 26 reformist The evolution of the political system introduced The implications of the Durham Report were much members were elected under Robert Baldwin; in by the Act of Union culminated in the granting of different for Upper Canada than for Lower Canada East, only seven true reform members responsible government to the North American Canada. Lord Durham wanted to re-establish were elected under Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine. colonies in 1848. From then on, ministers would peace in the colonies, and so recommended a Both politicians understood that they would have need the confidence of the House of Assembly or political union. He believed this peace could best to join forces to counter London's attempts to would have to resign. This concession by London, be achieved by ensuring a loyal English majority in dictate the colony's affairs. The arrangement a great step toward parliamentary democracy, British North America, by anglicizing French offered advantages to both parties. Baldwin was partly responsible for the instability that Canadians, and by granting responsible wanted real power for the House of Assembly. marked Canadian political history in the ten years government. By making English the only official La Fontaine believed he must abandon the before Confederation in 1867. language of the Parliament of United Canada, the concept of a French state in America and play Act of Union afforded protection to Upper British politics to ensure the survival of French Canadian culture. By giving Upper Canada as many Canadians in British North America. Lower Canada (Quebec) parliamentary representatives as the more populous Lower Canada, the Act of Union Baldwin and La Fontaine worked together to make Conquest and a Fledgling Regime favoured Upper Canadian political life. By sure both became members of the House of recommending the assimilation of French Assembly and the Executive Council. Favoured by After the famous battle between the French and Canadians, the Durham Report bolstered the the presence of Governor Charles Bagot, who the English on the Plains of Abraham of Quebec in presence of English-speaking Canadians in broke with former Governor General Lord 1759, and the capitulation of Montreal by the French in September 1760, the French regime was replaced by an English one. This period is now The American Declaration of Independence had The new constitution did not offer any solutions called the "Conquest." the effect of bringing to Canada a large number of for resolving conflicts that could arise between the The Conquest led to an entirely new regime. New Loyalists -- Americans who chose to flee the House of Assembly and the Executive Council. France became a British colony, just like Nova United States to remain loyal to the King and the Therefore, the Act of 1791 brought the Scotia and New Brunswick. The British took Empire. They came to the northern British parliamentary system to Lower Canada, but it control over all the land and established their way colonies: Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and clearly did not bring democracy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 900 History, Geography, and Auxiliary Disciplines
    900 900 History, geography, and auxiliary disciplines Class here social situations and conditions; general political history; military, diplomatic, political, economic, social, welfare aspects of specific wars Class interdisciplinary works on ancient world, on specific continents, countries, localities in 930–990. Class history and geographic treatment of a specific subject with the subject, plus notation 09 from Table 1, e.g., history and geographic treatment of natural sciences 509, of economic situations and conditions 330.9, of purely political situations and conditions 320.9, history of military science 355.009 See also 303.49 for future history (projected events other than travel) See Manual at 900 SUMMARY 900.1–.9 Standard subdivisions of history and geography 901–909 Standard subdivisions of history, collected accounts of events, world history 910 Geography and travel 920 Biography, genealogy, insignia 930 History of ancient world to ca. 499 940 History of Europe 950 History of Asia 960 History of Africa 970 History of North America 980 History of South America 990 History of Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds .1–.9 Standard subdivisions of history and geography 901 Philosophy and theory of history 902 Miscellany of history .2 Illustrations, models, miniatures Do not use for maps, plans, diagrams; class in 911 903 Dictionaries, encyclopedias, concordances of history 901 904 Dewey Decimal Classification 904 904 Collected accounts of events Including events of natural origin; events induced by human activity Class here adventure Class collections limited to a specific period, collections limited to a specific area or region but not limited by continent, country, locality in 909; class travel in 910; class collections limited to a specific continent, country, locality in 930–990.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy Basics – Family History, Educators in My Tobin Family
    Genealogy Basics – Family History, Educators in My Tobin Family By Joe Petrie INTRODUCTION Many Genealogy organizations have the word History or Historical in the title. For example, Cape Breton Genealogy and Historical Association (CBGHA) and Family History Society of Newfoundland and Labrador (FHSNL) are a couple of organizations that use the terms. In a Genealogy Basic article about the United Kingdom and Ireland web site (Genuki), I used the Genuki site’s definition of Family History. Suggest that you read it. The article is in cbgen Records\Research. It is labeled “Genealogy Basics – An Amazing Irish Web Site”. My title of the article indicates that the Genuki site had a fantastic Getting Started link. Other tabs on the site were not reviewed. My simple view of Family History is: If the author includes non-verifiable oral history, it is a Family History document. My Register Reports in Records\Family are Family History Reports. Please note that a report by a paid professional genealogist often will only include verifiable facts. Some professionals go beyond one verifiable fact. For example, members of the Association of Professional Genealogists try to verify using two verifiable sources. Also, please remember that most genealogy teachers encourage students to start with relatives. A few teachers even say that the facts should be verified. Some teachers start on-line with Census records. Latest US Census records are for 1940. Canada Census records are for 1921. BACKGROUND I’ll cover eight of generations of my Tobin direct line family or siblings who taught (or still teach) starting with Patrick Tobin who immigrated from Gowran, Kilkenney, Ireland to Northern Bay, Bay DeVerde, Newfoundland in the early 1800s.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA)
    Industry Update from Canada: Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA) Monday, 6 July 2020 In partnership with Welcome Michael Barton Regional Director, Canada Invest Northern Ireland – Americas For up to date information on Invest Northern Ireland in the Americas, follow us on LinkedIn & Twitter. Invest Northern Ireland – Americas @InvestNI_USA 2 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian Agri-tech sector… Industry Updates Sessions with industry experts to provide Northern Ireland manufacturers with updates on the Americas markets to assist with export planning and preparation Today’s Update We are delighted to welcome Beverly Leavitt, President & CEO of the Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA). CEEDA represents Equipment Dealers in the Province of Ontario, and the Atlantic Provinces in the Canadian Maritimes. 3 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian Agri-tech sector… Virtual Meet-the-Buyer programs designed to provide 1:1 support to connect Northern Ireland manufacturers with potential Canadian equipment dealers Ongoing dealer development in Eastern & Western Canada For new-to-market exporters, provide support, industry information and routes to market For existing exporters, market expansion and exploration of new Provinces 4 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian
    [Show full text]
  • 10-2 157410 Volumes 1-7 Open FA 10-2
    10-2_157410_volumes_1-7_open FA 10-2 RG Volume Reel no. Title / Titre Dates no. / No. / No. de de bobine volume RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Copy made of a surrender from the Six Nations to Caleb Benton, John Livingston and 1796-05-27 Associates, entered into 9 July 1788 RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Copy made of a surrender from the Six Nations to Caleb Benton, John Livingston and 1796-08-31 Associates, entered into 9 July 1788 RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Copy made of a surrender from the Six Nations to Caleb Benton, John Livingston and 1796-11-17 Associates, entered into 9 July 1788 RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Copy made of a surrender from the Six Nations to Caleb Benton, John Livingston and 1796-12-28 Associates, entered into 9 July 1788 RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 William Dummer Powell to Peter Russell respecting Joseph Brant 1797-01-05 RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Robert Prescott to Peter Russell respecting the Indian Department - Enclosed: Copy of Duke of 1797-04-26 Portland to Prescott, 13 December 1796, stating that the Lieutenant Governor of Upper Canada will head the Indian Department, but that the Department will continue to be paid from the military chest - Enclosed: Copy of additional instructions to Lieutenant Governor U.C., 15 December 1796, respecting the Indian Department - Enclosed: Extract, Duke of Portland to Prescott, 13 December 1796, respecting Indian Department in U.C. RG10-A-1-a 1 10996 Robert Prescott to Peter Russell sending a copy of Robert Liston's letter - Enclosed: Copy, 1797-05-18 Robert Liston to Prescott, 22 April 1797, respecting the frontier posts RG10-A-1-a
    [Show full text]
  • Ch4 Website Links with Audio
    Chapter 4 – Website links with audio British Isles England o RP – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-63 (female, 1954, white, Surrey (and abroad)) o South-West England – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-70 (female, 21, 1986, white, Torquay (Devon)) o South-East – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-91 (female, 46, 1966, white, Southampton (Hampshire) and USA) o London – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-62 (female, 21, 1985, white and Sri Lankan, South Norwood (South-East London)) o East – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-47 (male, 22, 1980, white, Cambridge) o East Midlands – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-66 (male, 40s, 1962, white, Gainsborough (Lincolnshire) and Yorkshire) o West Midlands – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-53 (female, 56, 1947, white, Gaydon (Warwickshire)) o Yorkshire and Humber – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-83 (male, 27, 1982, white, Skipton (North Yorkshire)) o North-West – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-44 (female, 31, 1970, white, Kirkdale (Liverpool) and Manchester) o North-East – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-13 (female, 43, 1957, white, Newcastle (Tyne and Wear)) (only one for comma gets a cure) o North-East – www.dialectsarchive.com/england-26 (female, 19, 1980, white, Gateshead (Tyne and Wear)) Wales o www.dialectsarchive.com/wales-6 (female, 20, 1989, Caucasian, Hirwaun and Carmarthen) Scotland o www.dialectsarchive.com/scotland-12 (male, 22, 1980, Caucasian, New Galloway and Edinburgh) Northern Ireland o www.dialectsarchive.com/northern-ireland-3 (female, 20s, Irish/Caucasian, Belfast) Republic of Ireland
    [Show full text]
  • From European Contact to Canadian Independence
    From European Contact to Canadian Independence Standards SS6H4 The student will describe the impact of European contact on Canada. a. Describe the influence of the French and the English on the language and religion of Canada. b. Explain how Canada became an independent nation. From European Contact to Quebec’s Independence Movement • The First Nations are the native peoples of Canada. • They came from Asia over 12,000 years ago. • They crossed the Bering Land Bridge that joined Russia to Alaska. • There were 12 tribes that made up the First Nations. • The Inuit are one of the First Nation tribes. • They still live in Canada today. • In 1999, Canada’s government gave the Inuit Nunavut Territory in northeast Canada. • The first explorers to settle Canada were Norse invaders from the Scandinavian Peninsula. • In 1000 CE, they built a town on the northeast coast of Canada and established a trading relationship with the Inuit. • The Norse deserted the settlement for unknown reasons. • Europeans did not return to Canada until almost 500 years later… • The Italian explorer, John Cabot, sailed to Canada’s east coast in 1497. • Cabot claimed an area of land for England (his sponsor) and named it “Newfoundland”. •Jacques Cartier sailed up the St. Lawrence River in 1534. •He claimed the land for France. •French colonists named the area “New France”. • In 1608, Samuel de Champlain built the first permanent French settlement in New France— called Quebec. • The population grew slowly. • Many people moved inland to trap animals. • Hats made of beaver fur were in high demand in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Epidemic of Asiatic Cholera in Lower Canada, 1832
    Medical History, 1977, 21: 411433 THE FIRST EPIDEMIC OF ASIATIC CHOLERA IN LOWER CANADA, 1832 by GEOFFREY BILSON* I. LOWER CANADA IN 1832 IN 1832 Quebec and Montreal were the majorcities of Lower Canadawithpopulations of twenty thousand and thirty thousand respectively. The rest of the population lived in smaller towns and villages scattered along the shores of the St. Lawrence. When the ice melted in spring, much of the travel in the province was done by boat along the river systems, and the St. Lawrence was dotted with hundreds of craft of all sizes in a traffic that was difficult to regulate. Conditions in the towns and cities of the province were the usual ones of the early nineteenth century. In Quebec, most of the population lived closely packed together below the cliff that dominates the city. Montreal was less densely settled but the bulk of the population lived crowded together in the cove.' The houses were small, dirty, and oftenjammed with permanent and transient residents. "It was not unusual for six or seven families to occupy a tenement formerly inhabited by one" according to one commentator who reported that in Quebec in 1831 "in a house containing two rooms. fifty persons were found . ."2. Water for the residents came from wells, from water-carriers, or directly from the river itself, and the water of the St. Lawrence was well known for its evil effects. The houses and the streets in cities and towns were dirty and piled with garbage. Slaughterhouses operated within city limits and the refuse was frequently dumped in the streets.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPECIAL COUNCILS of LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 By
    “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 by Maxime Dagenais Dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree in History. Department of History Faculty of Arts Université d’Ottawa\ University of Ottawa © Maxime Dagenais, Ottawa, Canada, 2011 ii ABSTRACT “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 Maxime Dagenais Supervisor: University of Ottawa, 2011 Professor Peter Bischoff Although the 1837-38 Rebellions and the Union of the Canadas have received much attention from historians, the Special Council—a political body that bridged two constitutions—remains largely unexplored in comparison. This dissertation considers its time as the legislature of Lower Canada. More specifically, it examines its social, political and economic impact on the colony and its inhabitants. Based on the works of previous historians and on various primary sources, this dissertation first demonstrates that the Special Council proved to be very important to Lower Canada, but more specifically, to British merchants and Tories. After years of frustration for this group, the era of the Special Council represented what could be called a “catching up” period regarding their social, commercial and economic interests in the colony. This first section ends with an evaluation of the legacy of the Special Council, and posits the theory that the period was revolutionary as it produced several ordinances that changed the colony’s social, economic and political culture This first section will also set the stage for the most important matter considered in this dissertation as it emphasizes the Special Council’s authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • 3676 Tee London Gazette, July 26' 1881
    3676 TEE LONDON GAZETTE, JULY 26' 1881. Lieutenant-general the Honourable James William 'Lieutenant-Colonel Oliver Henry Atkins Nicollsv BosvilleMacdonald, C.B., Colonel 21st Hussars. Royal Artillery. Lieutenant-General William Richard Preston. Lieutenant-Colonel Augustus Edmund Warren*,. Lieutenant-General' Thomas Conyngham Kelly, Seaforth Highlanders (Ross-shire Buffs). C.B. ' Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Bennett, the Duke of Lieutenant-General Richard Walter Lacy. Cornwall's Light Infantry. Lieutenant-General Ralph Budd. j Lieutenant-Colonel James Briggs, the Manchester Lieutenant-General John Amber Cole. Regiment. To be Lieutenant-General. Lieutenant-Colonel Edmund Penrose Bingham Major-General James Henry Craig Robertson. Turner, Royal Artillery. 1 Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Andrew Stuart, the= The following- Major-Generals to be Lieu- Royal Scots (Lothian Regiment). tenant-Generals from 1st July, 188.1,. to complete Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Gore, Royal Artillery. the Establishment allowed for the Royal Engi- Lieutenant-Colonel Somerville George Cameron neers :— Hogge, Princess Charlotte of Wales's (Berkshire Spencer Westmacott, Royal Engineers. Regiment). William Collier Menzies, Royal Engineers. Lieutenant-Colonel Hubert Le Cocq, Royal (Iate= Sir Robert Michael Laffan, K.C.M.G., Royal Bombay) Artillery. Engineers. Lieutenant-Colonel Philip Alexander Anstruther The undermentioned General Officers to be Twynam, the East Yorkshire Regimenr. Supernumerary to the Establishment, under the Lieutenant-Colonel John Sidney Hand, the Essex. provisions of Article. 24 I of the Royal War- Regiment. rant of 25th June, 1881 :->- Lieutenant-Colonel Harry McLeod, Royal (late General Robert Cornelia, Lord Napier of Mag- Madras) Artillery. dala, G.C.B., G.C.S.I., Colonel-Commandant. Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Edward Torriano, . Royal (late Bengal) Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the British Empire - Guo Xu Online Appendix
    34 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW MONTH YEAR The Costs of Patronage: Evidence from the British Empire - Guo Xu Online Appendix Figure A1. Sample of comparative revenue statement for Fiji 1854 (Blue Book) Note: Sample of comparative revenue statement for Fiji 1854 from the Blue Book. Each row records the revenue for a specific source (e.g. customs revenue). The two columns report the revenue in the current (1854) and the previous year (1853). VOL. VOL NO. ISSUE THE COSTS OF PATRONAGE 35 Figure A2. Distribution of degrees of separation and cut-off .15 .1 Density .05 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 Degrees of separation Dark grey = Observed ties; Light grey = Randomly drawn Note: Dark grey is the distribution of observed degrees of separation in the Colonial Office, light grey is the distribution for randomly drawn pairs from the population of the Peerage dataset. Vertical line marks the 16 degrees of separation cut-off. Figure A3. Size of switcher sample and cut-off for shared ancestry 80 60 40 20 Number of governors/terms 0 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Degrees of blood separation Within-governor shocks Within-term Note: Number of governors/governor-colony spells that experience a within-shock to connections as a function of the cut-off for connectedness 36 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW MONTH YEAR Figure A4. Retirement by connectedness - Survival estimates 1.00 0.75 0.50 Survival probability 0.25 p-value connected=unconnected: 0.15 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 Years served as governor Unconnected Connected Note: Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario: the Centre of Confederation?
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2018-10 Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999 University of Calgary Press Heidt, D. (Ed.). (2018). "Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999". Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108896 book https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca RECONSIDERING CONFEDERATION: Canada’s Founding Debates, 1864–1999 Edited by Daniel Heidt ISBN 978-1-77385-016-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating the Constitution Act, 1867
    TRANSLATING THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1867 A Legal-Historical Perspective by HUGO YVON DENIS CHOQUETTE A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Law in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September 2009 Copyright © Hugo Yvon Denis Choquette, 2009 Abstract Twenty-seven years after the adoption of the Constitution Act, 1982, the Constitution of Canada is still not officially bilingual in its entirety. A new translation of the unilingual Eng- lish texts was presented to the federal government by the Minister of Justice nearly twenty years ago, in 1990. These new French versions are the fruits of the labour of the French Constitutional Drafting Committee, which had been entrusted by the Minister with the translation of the texts listed in the Schedule to the Constitution Act, 1982 which are official in English only. These versions were never formally adopted. Among these new translations is that of the founding text of the Canadian federation, the Constitution Act, 1867. A look at this translation shows that the Committee chose to de- part from the textual tradition represented by the previous French versions of this text. In- deed, the Committee largely privileged the drafting of a text with a modern, clear, and con- cise style over faithfulness to the previous translations or even to the source text. This translation choice has important consequences. The text produced by the Commit- tee is open to two criticisms which a greater respect for the prior versions could have avoided. First, the new French text cannot claim the historical legitimacy of the English text, given their all-too-dissimilar origins.
    [Show full text]