DOCSLIB.ORG

Setting the Stage for Institution-Wide Digital Preservation at the Smithsonian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Setting the Stage for Institution-Wide Digital Preservation at the Smithsonian STEWARDING THE INVISIBLE Setting the Stage for Institution-Wide Digital Preservation at the Smithsonian Final Report November 15, 2016 Submitted by AVPreserve 253 36th St, Suite C302 Brooklyn, NY 11232 917-475-9630 Kara Van Malssen [email protected] Chris Lacinak [email protected] With contributions by Beth Delaney and Amy Rudersdorf, AVPreserve. Special thanks to Anne Van Camp, Director of the Smithsonian Institution Archives and chair of the pan-Smithsonian Digital Preservation Working Group, and all Working Group members. Stewarding the Invisible: Setting the Stage for Institution-Wide Digital Preservation at the Smithsonian Final report | Submitted by AVPreserve | November 15, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background a nd Previous Work ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Functional Scope ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.3.2 Content Scope ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.3.3 Organizational Scope ................................................................................................................................................. 15 1.4 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Interviews ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 1.4.2 Researcher Survey ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.4.3 Documentation R eview ............................................................................................................................................. 17 1.4.4 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18 1.5 Evaluation Fr amework ................................................................................................................................................ 18 2 FINDINGS: INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Resource Types and Quantities ................................................................................................................................ 20 2.1.1 R esource Types .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.1.2 Quantities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 23 2.2 Systems ............................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Repositories .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 Systems in Use ............................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3 Current Obstacles or Issues ....................................................................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Collecting U nits ............................................................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.2 Repositories .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.3 Content Creators .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 2.4 Ideas and Opportunitie s for Improvement ......................................................................................................... 37 3 FINDINGS: RESEARCHER SURVEY ........................................................................................ 41 3.1 Data Amounts ................................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.1.1 Data Total Calculation .............................................................................................................................................. 43 3.1.2 Future projections ....................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.2 Data Types .......................................................................................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Data Retention Periods ................................................................................................................................................. 47 3.4 Data Storage Locations ................................................................................................................................................. 49 4 FINDINGS: DOCUMENTATION REVIEW .............................................................................. 53 4.1 Digitization Strategic Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 53 4.2 SD 600 & SD 610 ............................................................................................................................................................. 55 4.3 Digital Asset Management Plans / Data Management Plans ....................................................................... 57 4.4 Sharing Smithsonian Digital Scientific Research Data from Biology ....................................................... 59 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................... 62 2 Stewarding the Invisible: Setting the Stage for Institution-Wide Digital Preservation at the Smithsonian Final report | Submitted by AVPreserve | November 15, 2016 5.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................................................... 62 5.2 Organizational Maturity .............................................................................................................................................. 65 5.3 Threats ................................................................................................................................................................................ 67 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 70 6.1 Instill a sense of urgency .............................................................................................................................................. 71 6.1.1 Quantify the need .......................................................................................................................................................... 71 6.1.2 Communicate broadly ................................................................................................................................................. 74 6.2 Establish g overnance and oversight ...................................................................................................................... 74 6.2.1 Establish a Digital Preservation Directorate .................................................................................................. 75 6.2.2 Establish a n advisory board .................................................................................................................................... 75 6.2.3 Define roles and responsibilities ........................................................................................................................... 76 6.3 Create a vision for digital preservation ................................................................................................................ 76 6.3.1 Demonstrate the value .............................................................................................................................................. 77 6.3.2 Incorporate the vision into Strategic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Innovative Success That Is Apple, Inc. 1
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2012 The nnoI vative Success that is Apple, Inc. Katherine Johnson [email protected] Yang Li [email protected] Hang Phan [email protected] Jason Singer Hoang Trinh [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Marketing Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Katherine; Li, Yang; Phan, Hang; Singer, Jason; and Trinh, Hoang, "The nnoI vative Success that is Apple, Inc." (2012). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 418. This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Innovative Success that is Apple, Inc. 1 The Innovative Success that is Apple, Inc. Katherine Johnson Yang Li Hang Phan Jason Singer Hoang Trinh Introduction- The Birth of a Brain Child Apple, Inc. started out as an idea of one man. This man was Steve Jobs. Jobs and his friend, Steve Wozniak, were two high school drop outs living in the Silicon Valley with extremely innovative and intelligent minds (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012). The pair teamed up, while working for Hewlett Packard, to start Apple, Inc. from the basement of Jobs’ home (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012). The pair created the first Apple computer on April 1, 1976 (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Curation and Digital Preservation: an Introduction
    Digital Curation and Digital Preservation: An Introduction JCDL 2007: Tutorial 10 June 19, 2007 Dr. Helen R. Tibbo and Carolyn Hank School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Outline Tutorial Packet Developments: Digital Schedule Curation Timeline Bibliography Case Study Introduction Assessment Key Reports & Issues Readiness Key Projects & Web Wrap-up Sites 2 Introduction: Why We Are Here Digital preservation (DP) and digital curation (DC) stand as grand opportunities and challenges of the first decade of the 21st century and beyond. 3 Introduction: Grand Challenges “Long-term curation and preservation represent a complex set of challenges, which are exceptionally difficult for data centres and institutions to address individually. They will require a step change in current investment and approaches, and concerted effort on fundamental research, development of shared services, expertise and tools to assist organisations in this work.” - JISC Circular 6/03 “An invitation for expressions of interest to establish a new Digital Curation Centre for research into and support of the curation and preservation of digital data and publications” 4 Introduction: View from the Scientific Community The anticipated growth in both the production and repurposing of digital data raises complex issues not only of scale and heterogeneity, but also of stewardship, curation and long- term access. - NSF. Cyberinfrastructure Council. “Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st Century Discovery.” March 2007. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf 5 Introduction: View from the Internet/ Blogger Community "WN: The focus of the internet frontier has shifted from the pipes, to search, to community, to blogs, and now video.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Bruce Willis Leave His Itunes Collection to His Children?: Inheritability of Digital Media in the Face of Eulas Claudine Wong
    Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal Volume 29 | Issue 4 Article 5 5-23-2013 Can Bruce Willis Leave His iTunes Collection to His Children?: Inheritability of Digital Media in the Face of EULAs Claudine Wong Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Claudine Wong, Can Bruce Willis Leave His iTunes Collection to His Children?: Inheritability of Digital Media in the Face of EULAs, 29 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 703 (2012). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol29/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WONG 5/23/2013 3:48 PM CAN BRUCE WILLIS LEAVE HIS ITUNES COLLECTION TO HIS CHILDREN?: INHERITABILITY OF DIGITAL MEDIA IN THE FACE OF EULAS Claudine Wong† Abstract In early September, 2012, multiple news agencies reported that actor Bruce Willis was going to sue Apple for the right to pass his iTunes collection to his children upon his death. While the story ultimately proved to be false, it begs the question: Can Mr. Willis actually pass his iTunes songs, legally purchased but subject to a license agreement, to his daughters? We are increasingly acquiring digital music and e-books, copyrighted digital content with legally well-understood physical equivalents.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Curation at Work Modeling Workflows for Digital Archival Materials
    Digital Curation at Work Modeling Workflows for Digital Archival Materials Colin Post Alexandra Chassanoff Christopher A. Lee University of North Carolina Educopia Institute University of North Carolina [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Andrew Rabkin Yinglong Zhang Katherine Skinner University of North Carolina University of North Carolina Educopia Institute [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sam Meister Educopia Institute [email protected] ABSTRACT materials that have typically been the province of archives and This paper describes and compares digital curation workflows from special collections, a great deal of processing work needs to occur 12 cultural heritage institutions that vary in size, nature of digital before materials are available to users. While libraries and archives collections, available resources, and level of development of digital have established practices and policies for managing analog mate- curation activities. While the research and practice of digital cura- rials, individual institutions and the archival field as a whole are tion continues to mature in the cultural heritage sector, relatively still developing best practices, standards, and shared terminologies little empirical, comparative research on digital curation activities for processing digital materials [3, 14]. has been conducted to date. The present research aims to advance Digital curation activities are complex, involving diverse skills knowledge about digital curation as it is currently practiced in and techniques, software tools and systems, and a range of profes- the field, principally by modeling digital curation workflows from sional and paraprofessional staff. Due to the variety of functions different institutional contexts. This greater understanding can con- involved and the ongoing nature of digital curation work, no single tribute to the advancement of digital curation software, practices, software environment can manage the entire scope of the steward- and technical skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Upstream Database and Digital Asset Management in Variable Data Printing Franziska Frey
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Books 2008 Upstream database and digital asset management in variable data printing Franziska Frey Nicholas Barzelay Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/books Recommended Citation Frey, Franziska and Barzelay, Nicholas, "Upstream database and digital asset management in variable data printing" (2008). Accessed from http://scholarworks.rit.edu/books/43 This Full-Length Book is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Upstream Database and Digital Asset Management in Variable Data Printing By Franziska Frey, Ph.D. McGhee Distinguished Professor School of Print Media Nicholas D. Barzelay, MPA, M.S. Print Media Adjunct Professor School of Print Media A Research Monograph of the Rochester Institute of Technology Printing Industry Center at RIT No. PICRM-2008-01 Upstream Database and Digital Asset Management in Variable Data Printing By Franziska Frey, Ph.D. McGhee Distinguished Professor School of Print Media Rochester Institute of Technology Nicholas D. Barzelay, MPA, M.S. Print Media Adjunct Professor School of Print Media Rochester Institute of Technology A Research Monograph of the Printing Industry Center at RIT Rochester, NY January 2008 PICRM-2008-01 © 2008 Printing Industry Center at RIT— All rights reserved. i With Thanks The research agenda of the Printing Industry Center at RIT and the publication of research findings are supported by the following organizations: bc ii Frey & Barzelay (PICRM-2008-01) Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Digital Asset Management for Electronic Texts in Academic Research Libraries
    BEST PRACTICES IN DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC TEXTS IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH LIBRARIES William Cleland A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF EDUCATION August 2007 Committee: Paul Cesarini, Advisor Linda Brown Kathryn S. Hoff © 2007 William Cleland All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Dr. Paul Cesarini, Advisor Digital information is becoming increasingly prevalent and libraries must develop new strategies to effectively archive electronic materials. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify and synthesize best practices of digital asset management of electronic texts in academic research libraries. The study was a “snapshot” of major topics related to digital asset management. Minimal research has been conducted to identify best practices in this field when compared to the amount of research that has been conducted for the print domain. The main issues that are seen in existing literature are digital materials selection, funding, digital rights management (DRM), and information authenticity. Several major trends also arose from the literature, including digital library architecture, metadata standards and search strategies, and bibliographic management software. A modified Delphi study was used to gather qualitative data from librarians at several institutions within the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Eight librarians from several ARL institutions participated in two E-mail questionnaires. Participants were selected by identifying research-extensive libraries on the ARL website and selecting potential participants based on their job titles. Data was analyzed by identifying major themes and patterns that arose in the individual responses. Participants all possessed baccalaureate degrees, but had varied educational backgrounds, representing fields such as computer science, history, humanities, and natural sciences.
    [Show full text]