DOCSLIB.ORG

HT1- Germany and the Growth of Democracy)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HT1- Germany and the Growth of Democracy) Germany, 1890-1945 (HT1 - Germany and the growth of democracy) From the spec; Kaiser Wilhelm II; The Social Democratic Party (SPD); • Kaiser Wilhelm and the difficulties of ruling Germany: the growth of parliamentary government; the In 1888, Wilhelm's father • Wilhelm II did not have complete power as Germany had an elected Reichstag, which was needed to pass legislation influence of Prussian militarism; industrialisation; social reform and the growth of socialism; the domestic succeeded as Frederick III. He (laws). Wilhelm could however, dismiss the Reichstag (which he often did), but the elections were freely held so he could importance of the Navy Laws. died shortly afterwards, making not directly influence the vote. • Impact of the First World War: war weariness, economic problems; defeat; the end of the monarchy; post- Wilhelm Kaiser at the age of 29. • The growth of socialism and the Social Democratic Party (SPD) was particularly concerning for the Kaiser. The SPD war problems including reparations, the occupation of the Ruhr and hyperinflation. He was a strong believer in frequently voted against the legislation the Kaiser wanted. The socialists thought that wealth should be shared equally • Weimar democracy: political change and unrest, 1919–1923, including Spartacists, Kapp Putsch and the increasing the strength of the between everyone in society. The idea became more popular in Germany in the 1900s and by 1912 the SPD was the Munich Putsch; the extent of recovery during the Stresemann era (1924–1929): economic developments German armed forces, biggest party in the Reichstag! including the new currency, Dawes Plan and the Young Plan; the impact of international agreements on particularly the Navy. His recovery; Weimar culture. policies towards Britain were Causes of World War One contradictory. He alienated Basic knowledge; Wilhelm pursued a policy that he wanted to make Germany powerful and well respected by other nations. This was Britain with his naval expansion Germany became a country in 1871 after they beat the French in a short war (1870-71). called Wilhelm’s Weltpolitik (world politics). (Naval Race) and a policy of They had a Chancellor (Prime Minister) and a parliament (Reichstag). Germany formed an alliance (remember these from Year 9!) with Austria-Hungary in1882. There ended up being two aggressive German colonial The Kaiser (King) could overrule the Reichstag and made ALL the decisions about the Army, Navy alliances, Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia) and the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy). expansion (Weltpolitik – ‘A and agreements with other countries = Too much power for one man! This led to a build-up of armies and navies. Germany brought in its Navy Laws which meant that the Kaiser ordered place in the sun’), and also The new Kaiser on 1888 (Wilhelm II) wanted to make Germany a very powerful country as powerful Admiral Tirpitz to enlarge the Germany Navy to rival the British Navy (then the best and biggest in the world). supported the Boers in their as Britain (with huge industries too), so Germany industrialised so by 1913 Germany was producing A new super-warship was created called the ‘Dreadnought’. fight against the British. But he more iron and steel than Britain, and dominated the European market in terms of electrical goods This table shows you how quickly both countries were building their navies. and chemicals. was also closely related to the Wealth increased amongst the landowners and business people, but not amongst workers so they British royal family and was created trade unions and believed that power and wealth should be more equal across Germany particularly fond of his (This is called Socialism). This was a threat to Kaiser Wilhelm’s power. grandmother, Queen Victoria. The German government trying to prevent a workers’ revolution brought in state education and pensions for older workers, and promised Germans more wealth, power and a big empire. Year Great Britain (Built that Germany (Built that year) year) 1907 1 0 1909 3 4 1912 11 5 Total (by 1914) 34 22 Germany, 1890-1945 (HT1- Germany and the growth of democracy) Why did the Germans hate the Treaty of Versailles? Challenges from the left; Weimar Constitution; Land Who were the Spartacists? - Left-wing revolutionaries who Strengths • Alsace-Lorraine returned to France wanted to get rid of the Kaiser. They wanted a social revolution All Germans had equal rights, including the right to vote • West Prussia and Posen (Polish Corridor) lost to Poland like the Russian Revolution (1917). Proportional representation made sure parties had the same percentage of • Saarland taken over by the League of Nations for 15 years Reasons for failure of Spartacist Uprising (1919). They were seats in parliament as they did in the election • Germany’s colonies were handed over to the League of Nations, poorly organised and the Spartacists failed to capture many Provided a strong leader to keep control over the country in an emergency who gave them to Britain and France to run buildings in Berlin. They lacked support of other left-wing groups. Each state had its own assembly to represent local interests The Government had support of the Friekorps. The Spartacist Weaknesses Army leaders were murdered. It was too radical an experiment given the volatile nature of German society • Air force was disbanded after the war • Army limited to 100,000 soldiers Challenges from the right; PR encouraged lots of small parties so no one party ever had enough seats to • Navy limited to 15,000 sailors, six battleships and no submarines form a majority government • Rhineland occupied by the Allies for 15 years Who were the Freikorps? - Former soldiers in the German Army. The president could use Article 48 to become a dictator • No German troops allowed in this area They were a right-wing, conservative organisation who hated the Local states could resist the authority of central government Treaty of Versailles (1919) - many had been forced to leave the Money Army. They helped President Ebert put down Spartacist Uprising To Give an Example • As Germany was held responsible for the war, the allies could claim (1919). (1) For example (2) for instance (3) in particular, particularly (e.g. particularly reparations for the damage caused Reasons for failure of Kapp Putsch (1920) - Putsch centred on important, was...) (4) specifically (e.g. Hitler bombed St Paul’s Cathedral specifically to • In 1921 a special commission fixed a sum of £6,600 m. to be paid in Berlin – and didn’t spread to rest of Germany. The Weimar destroy British morale) (5) this is shown by (e.g. this is shown by the fact that...). annual instalments Government continued and was able to relocate to Dresden. The • The Treaty also took away 10% of Germany’s industry and 15% of its German people were tired of revolution - Spartacist Uprising 1923 – A crisis year Invasion of the Ruhr Hyperinflation Munich Putsch agricultural land occurred 1919. The workers went on strike which halted the putsch. Why was this a Germany did not keep German govt. printed extra November 1923, right-wing Blame problem? up with reparations banknotes to cover costs of extremists plot a putsch • Article 231 of the Treaty stated that Germany was to blame for German outrage; reparations against the Reich government causing the war. When the Germans heard about the Treaty of Versailles, they January 1923, French felt ‘pain and anger’. They felt it was unfair. It was a 'Diktat' an and Belgian troops Value of money goes down and Led by Ludendorff & Adolf IMPOSED (DIKTAT)settlement. They had not been allowed to marched into the Ruhr - prices rise to compensate Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) Key articles take part in the talks – they had just been told to sign. legal under the Treaty Party launch an attempted of Versailles Pensions and savings lost revolution in Munich, the 1‐26: The Covenant of the League of Nations ‐ Germany was not allowed capital city of Bavaria. Question 1; How does Interpretation B differ from to join. Factories & industrial Wages lost all value Interpretation A about _____________ ( 4 marks) 42: The Rhineland was demilitarised ‐ the German army was not allowed production ground to a to go there. halt People blamed new Weimar Question 2; Why might the authors of Interpretation A and B 45: The Saar, with its rich coalfields, given to France for 15 years. government, which had agreed to have a different interpretation about ____________ (4 marks) 51: Alsace‐Lorraine returned to France. The Germans reparations under the Versailles 80: Germany forbidden to unite with Austria. responded with passive Treaty Question 3; Which interpretation do you find more convincing 87: Lands in eastern Germany ‐ the rich farmlands of Posen and the resistance, but this about ________________ (8 marks) Polish corridor between Germany and East Prussia ‐ given to Poland. made Germany even 100: Danzig made a free city under League of Nations control. poorer 119: All Germany's colonies taken and given to France and Britain as Question 4; Describe ______ (4 marks) 'mandates'. 160: The German Army restricted to 100,000 men. Question 5; In what ways did _________ Explain your answer. Fun fact; Words to include; 181: The German Navy restricted to six battleships and no submarines. (8 marks) Germany did not pay off the reparations bill until 2010. 198: Germany not allowed to have an air force. Repayment was interrupted by Hitler during his time in • Therefore…. 231: Germany was responsible for causing all the loss and damage Question 6; A factor question. You will be given two bullet power, which delayed the final pay off to 1996. However, • Consequently… caused by the war. points. You need to write a paragraph on each bullet point and a clause in the agreement said that Germany would have to • Moreover… 232: Germany would have to pay reparations, to be decided later ‐ then a paragraph in conclusion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Addresses 100Th International Labour Conference
    H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Addresses 100th International Labour Conference In the first ever visit of a German Chancellor to the International Labour Organisation (ILO), H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel today addressed the Organization’s annual conference. Speaking to the historic 100th session of the International Labour Conference (ILC) Ms Merkel highlighted the increasing role played by the ILO in closer international cooperation. The G8 and G20 meetings would be “unthinkable without the wealth of experience of this Organisation”, she said, adding that the ILO’s involvement was the only way “to give globalization a form, a structure” (In German with subtitles in English). Transcription in English: Juan Somavia, Director-General, International Labour Organization: “Let me highlight your distinctive sense of policy coherence. Since 2007, you have regularly convened in Berlin the heads of the IMF, World Bank, WTO, OECD and the ILO, and urged us to strengthen our cooperation, and this with a view to building a strong social dimension of globalization and greater policy coherence among our mandates. These dialogues, under your guidance, have been followed up actively by the ILO with important joint initiatives with all of them, whose leaders have all addressed the Governing Body of the ILO. You have been a strong voice for a fairer, more balanced globalization in which much needs to be done by all international organizations.” Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany: “Universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based on social justice.” This is the first sentence of the Constitution of the ILO and I also wish to start my speech with these words, as they clearly express what the ILO is all about and what it is trying to achieve: universal peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Joint Statement
    Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Joint Statement by President Biden and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany— Washington Declaration July 15, 2021 Today, the President of the United States and the Chancellor of Germany affirm their commitment to close bilateral cooperation in promoting peace, security, and prosperity around the world. The foundation of our relationship is a shared commitment to democratic principles, values, and institutions. Together, we will uphold the rule of law, promote transparency and good governance, and support civil society and independent media. We will defend the rights and dignity of all individuals, and counter injustice and inequality wherever it occurs. We uphold the universal values at the heart of the United Nations Charter and stand together in our commitment to promote respect for human rights everywhere, including by rejecting and responding in concert to violations of human rights. We must act now to demonstrate that democracy delivers for our people at home and that democratic leadership delivers for the world. We commit ourselves to defending an open world. Across the globe, all nations must be free to determine their political futures free from foreign interference, coercion, or domination by outside powers. As two nations whose economies depend on the free transit of goods around the world, we affirm the critical importance of the freedoms of navigation and overflight and other lawful uses of the sea, consistent with international law. This vision is unachievable in a world carved into competing spheres of influence and we will resist attempts to create them, be it through attempts at territorial annexation, control of digital infrastructure, transnational repression, or weaponized energy flows.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Birth of the Euro' from <I>EUROPE</I> (December 2001
    'The birth of the euro' from EUROPE (December 2001-January 2002) Caption: On the eve of the entry into circulation of euro notes and coins on January 1, 2002, the author of the article relates the history of the single currency's birth. Source: EUROPE. Magazine of the European Union. Dir. of publ. Hélin, Willy ; REditor Guttman, Robert J. December 2001/January 2002, No 412. Washington DC: Delegation of the European Commission to the United States. ISSN 0191- 4545. Copyright: (c) EUROPE Magazine, all rights reserved The magazine encourages reproduction of its contents, but any such reproduction without permission is prohibited. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_birth_of_the_euro_from_europe_december_2001_january_2002-en-fe85d070-dd8b- 4985-bb6f-d64a39f653ba.html Publication date: 01/10/2012 1 / 5 01/10/2012 The birth of the euro By Lionel Barber On January 1, 2002, more than 300 million European citizens will see the euro turn from a virtual currency into reality. The entry into circulation of euro notes and coins means that European Monetary Union (EMU), a project devised by Europe’s political elite over more than a generation, has finally come down to the street. The psychological and economic consequences of the launch of Europe’s single currency will be far- reaching. It will mark the final break from national currencies, promising a cultural revolution built on stable prices, enduring fiscal discipline, and lower interest rates. The origins of the euro go back to the late 1960s, when the Europeans were searching for a response to the upheaval in the Bretton Woods system, in which the US dollar was the dominant currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    Department of the Taoiseach Annual Report 2019 Department of the Taoiseach Annual Report 2019 Message from the Taoiseach I welcome the publication of this report which sets out the activities of the Taoiseach’s Department throughout 2019 in delivering on the Strategic Priorities in the Department’s Statement of Strategy. 2019 was a challenging year for Ireland and I would like to thank the staff in the Department for their continued expertise and commitment. This report only reflects a fraction of the work that transpires on a day-to-day basis but which plays a crucial role in supporting both the Taoiseach and the Government. I am honoured by my recent appointment as Taoiseach and I look forward to working with the staff of the Department as we go forward to tackle issues like Covid19, Brexit, and the recovery of our economy and society. Micheál Martin Taoiseach 2 Department of the Taoiseach Annual Report 2019 Introduction by the Secretary General This is the third and final Annual Report to be published under the Department of the Taoiseach’s Statement of Strategy 2017-2020 and reflects the work that was carried out the Department under each of its Strategic Priorities. Throughout 2019 the Department continued to support the Taoiseach and Government including through supporting Cabinet meetings, providing policy advice, implementing Government policy, organising State events and inward official visits, Parliamentary Questions, EU engagements, and facilitating the productive relationship between the Government and the Oireachtas. Brexit was a strong feature in the work of the Department and staff worked closely with colleagues in the Department of Foreign Affairs to co-ordinate the whole-of-Government effort on planning, programme management and communications on Brexit preparedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from 55 Civil Society Organisations to EU Heads Of
    To: Federal Chancellor of Austria, Sebastian Kurz; Prime Minister of Belgium, Charles Michel; Prime Minister of Bulgaria, Boyko Borissov; Prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenkovic; President of the Republic of Cyprus, Nicos Anastasiades; Prime Minister of Czech Republic, Andrej Babis; Prime Minister of Denmark, Lars Lokke Rasmussen; Prime Minister of Estonia, Juri Ratas; Prime Minister of Finland, Juha Sipila; President of the Republic of France, Emmanuel Macron; Federal Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel; Prime Minister of Greece, Alexis Tsipras; Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban; Taoiseach of Ireland, Leo Varadkar; Prime Minister of Italy, Giuseppe Conte; Prime Minister of Latvia, Krisjanis Karins; President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybauskaite; Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Xavier Bettel; Prime Minister of Malta, Joseph Muscat; Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte; Prime Minister of Poland, Mateusz Morawiecki; Prime Minister of Portugal, Antonio Costa; President of Romania, Klaus Werner Iohannis; Prime Minister of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini; Prime Minister of Slovenia, Marjan Sarec; President of the Government of Spain, Pedro Sanchez; Prime Minister of Sweden, Stefan Lofven. 7th May 2019 Dear Federal Chancellor/President/Prime Minister/Taoiseach, On behalf of 55 civil society organisations from across Europe, we are writing to you to urge you to nominate European commissioners who will support and serve present and future generations, and prioritise environment, quality of life and decent work. Every day, people across Europe struggle with growing poverty and inequality, deteriorating access to healthcare and worrying levels of youth unemployment. Meanwhile, many large companies pollute the environment, refuse to pay their fair share of taxes and wield disproportionate political influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Angela Merkel As a Linguistic Persona)
    SHS Web of Conferences 50, 01013 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001013 CILDIAH-2018 „Wir Schaffen Das!“ (Angela Merkel as a Linguistic Persona) Olga Mikhina 1 Artem Mikhin 2, and Svetlana Shulezhkova 3 Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, 455000, Lenin Prospekt, 38, Magnitogorsk, Russia Abstract. The problem posed by the authors of this paper is to reveal peculiarities of linguistic persona of one of the most authoritative state and political actors of our time: Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. Material for the research comes from various election debates, speeches at international forums and in Bundestag, addresses to voters, interviews of "the engine of the EU" with journalists of various media outlets. An anthropocentric approach that has become the main principle of modern linguistics, enriched with procedures having being developed within cultural, political and social linguistics, application of methods used in study of linguistic persona in the context of gender and values presented in the media and political discourse, allowed to attain certain results. Lexical and idiomatic markers in Angela Merkel's speeches, her formulation of basic principles of domestic and foreign policy, linguistic response to crisis events and provocative questions give a possibility to model the main parameters of her linguistic persona. She is a strong leader with muffled gender attributes, which usually appear in selection of linguistic means that always conform to the literary language. Physical chemist by education, Merkel speaks logically and strictly to the point in the media and political discourse as well. Having being ushered into the elite of male rulers, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler Rise to Power OI
    Name: ______________________________________ Hitler’s Rise to Power DBQ – Outside Information Directions: highlight or underline information related to the DBQ packet you just completed. In the early 1930s, the mood in Germany was grim. The worldwide economic depression had hit the country especially hard, and millions of people were out of work. Still fresh in the minds of many was Germany's humiliating defeat fifteen years earlier during World War I, and Germans lacked confidence in their weak government, known as the Weimar Republic. These conditions provided the chance for the rise of a new leader, Adolf Hitler, and his party, the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), or Nazi party for short. Hitler was a powerful and spellbinding speaker who attracted a wide following of Germans desperate for change. He promised the disenchanted a better life and a new and glorious Germany. The Nazis appealed especially to the unemployed, young people, and members of the lower middle class (small store owners, office employees, craftsmen, and farmers). The party's rise to power was rapid. Before the economic depression struck, the Nazis were practically unknown, winning only 3 percent of the vote to the Reichstag (German parliament) in elections in 1924. In the 1932 elections, the Nazis won 33 percent of the votes, more than any other party. In January 1933 Hitler was appointed chancellor, the head of the German government, and many Germans believed that they had found a savior for their nation. Adolf Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933, bringing an end to German democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Angela Merkel's Cabinet
    angelaangela merkel’smerkel’s cabinetcabinet 1 2 3 study 4 study guide angela merkel’s cabinet 5 indexindex SECRETARIAT WELCOMING LETTER..............................................8 USG FOR crisis committees WELCOMING LETTER...............9 DAIS and crisis director WELCOMING LETTER.................10 Invitation from Angela Merkel and Franz-WalteSteinmer................................................................12 background.................................................................................12 6 indexindex 13....................................................................economic context 14.....................................................................political context 19.........................................................where whe stand today 20....................................................................................references 7 Secretariat welcoming letter Dear Delegates, It is with honor and pride that the Secretariat wishes to welcome you to Universidad de Los Andes’ MUN’s eighth edition, MONUA 2019. My name is Juan Camilo Romero, an Economics and History Major here at Universidad de Los Andes. It is with gratitude that I invite you to enjoy this committee in the best way possible and profit the most from its possibilities. Along with Santiago Paz, Economics and Law major from the same institution, we would like to make you feel the same passion we feel for international relations, economic and political situations and intellectual debates that surround not only our reality, but that have
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, February 2019 1
    Calendar of Benoît Cœuré Member of the ECB’s Executive Board February 2019 Date Meeting / Event (incl. topic / meeting participants, as applicable) Location Friday, 1 February Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and Financial Cape Town Stability Institute (FSI) high-level meeting for Africa on strengthening financial sector supervision and current regulatory priorities Monday, 4 February Meeting with WWF France, on climate finance Paris Meeting with French Insurance Federation (FFA), on economic Paris prospects Tuesday, 5 February Ceremony to mark International Holocaust Remembrance Day ECB Executive Board ECB Meeting with media ECB Meeting with HSBC, on Brexit ECB Wednesday, 13 February Meeting with media Paris Board meeting of Paris School of Economics Paris Friday, 15 February C. Peter McColough Series on International Economics, New York organised by Council on Foreign Relations – speech on “The euro’s global role in a changing world: a monetary policy perspective” Meeting with President of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York Mr John C. Williams, on issues of common interest Meeting with JP Morgan, on outlook for US capital markets New York Monday, 18 February Meeting with German Ministry of Finance, Mr Jakob von Berlin Weizsäcker, on economic situation in Germany and euro area deepening Meeting with President of German Institute for Economic Berlin Research (DIW), Mr Marcel Fratzscher, on economic situation in Germany and euro area deepening Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, February 2019 1 Meeting with Chancellor of Germany,
    [Show full text]
  • Cuius Regio? REGIO Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia Vol
    CUIUS Cuius regio? REGIO Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia vol. 3 eds Lucyna Harc, Przemysław Wiszewski, Rościsław Żerelik Silesia under the Authority of the Hohenzollerns (1741–1918) (1741–1918) Silesia under the Authority of Hohenzollerns vol. 3 Silesia under the Authority This volume contains a collection of studies which are the product of research of the Hohenzollerns (1741–1918) on the formation of Silesia as a region in the period 1740-1918. It is another portion of the summary of research undertaken by a team of Polish historians in conjunction with their participation in the programme of the European Science Foundation entitled Cuius regio. An analysis of the cohesive and disruptive forces determining the attachment and commitment of (groups of) persons to and the cohesion within regions. The project’s assumptions were for original analyses to be conducted on five factors significant in the functioning of the region: administration (Paweł Jaworski), economy (Teresa Kulak), social groups (Wanda Musialik and Dorota Schreiber-Kurpiers), ethnic issues (Dorota Schreiber-Kurpiers) and the national and cultural identity of the region’s inhabitants (Teresa Kulak). In each of the spheres analysed in this book, what has been demonstrated is the prevalence of disintegrating factors in the region from the period of its seizure by the armies of Frederick II until the conclusion of World War I. Top-down efforts undertaken by the authorities aimed at integrating the region with the Prussian state, and then with the Reich, did not fully achieve their objectives. The split into the two sub-regions of Upper and Lower Silesia would seem to be inevitable, in spite of particular unifying elements, particularly in the economic sphere during the second half of the 19ʰ and beginning of the 20ʰ century.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Harper – Prime Minister of Canada Born in April 1959 in Toronto, Ontario. the 22
    Stephen Harper Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper – Prime Minister of Canada Born in April 1959 in Toronto, Ontario. The 22 nd Canadian Prime Minister, he has been serving in that role since 2006 and is a member of the Conservative Party. Married to Laureen, they have two children – Benjamin and Rachel. He is an Evangelical Christian. Harper supports cutting government spending and taxes. As Prime Minister, he has cut the goods and services tax and approved a budget that would cut funding to several government programs. He has shown support for the military and a bigger Canadian military presence in the northern part of Canada. His background is in Economics. Stephen Harper Francois Hollande President of France Francois Hollande – President of France Born in August 1954 in Rouen in France. He became President on 15 May 2012 and is a member of the Socialist Party. His current partner is Valerie Trierweiler and he has four children – Thomas, Clemence, Julien and Flora. Hollande was raised as a Roman Catholic but is now agnostic. His work has been wide-ranging and includes merging of income taxes and has sought to reduce electricity generated nuclear power in favour of renewable energy. He authorised an operation to curtail the activities of Islamic extremists in the north of Mali. A lawyer by profession he personally supports same sex marriage and adoption. Francois Hollande Angela Merkel President of Germany Angela Merkel – Chancellor of Germany Born in July 1954 in Hamburg . She was elected Chancellor for Germany in November 2005 – the first ever woman Chancellor and is Chair of the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU), the Conservative Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Leadership Lessons from Otto Von Bismarck
    4 LEADERSHIP LESSONS FROM OTTO VON BISMARCK If there was a leader who made Germany a modern, unified nation and a world power it was Otto von Bismarck. A Junker (a Prussian term meaning wealthy landowners), Otto von Bismarck was born in 1815 growing up on a wealthy family estate situated west of Berlin in the Kingdom of Prussia. As the son of a former Prussian military officer and the well-educated daughter of a senior government official in Berlin, Bismarck was outspoken and highly intelligent. He attended good schools, studied law, and was happily married to Johanna von Puttkamer, a daughter of a conservative aristocratic family in Prussia. Bismarck commenced his political career in 1847, as a member of Prussia's legislature and gained notoriety for his reactionary politics. He supported Prussia remaining as the Kingdom of Prussia. He was conservative, anti-democratic and anti-socialist. He told one of his fellow conservatives, “We are Prussians, and Prussians we shall remain…. We do not wish to see the Kingdom of Prussia obliterated in the putrid brew of cosy south German sentimentality.” Yet at the same time he recognised the future of Prussia relied on the development of the German Confederation which he was later to lead to German unification. Bismarck followed Realpolitik politics or diplomacy based primarily on considerations of given circumstances and factors, rather than explicit ideological notions or moral and ethical premises. As such, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism and has been described as politics that is perceived as coercive, amoral, or Machiavellian.
    [Show full text]