GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 27, NO. 7, PAGES 1069-1072, APRIL 1,2000
Non-active dunes in the Acheron Fossae region of Mars between the Viking and Mars Global Surveyor eras
James R. Zimbelman Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
Abstract. Comparison of a high resolution Viking image area during the Science Phasing Orbit portion of the MGS (422810; 8 mlpixel) with a Mars Orbiter Camera image (SP2- mission [Albee el al., 19981, the images from which were 502106; 5.6 mlpixel) ur duneb in the Acheron Fossae region of recently released. The MOC image covers an area coincident Mars (3S0N, 135"W) rcvcals that the dunes moved Very shallow Vlking missions. This situation represents a unique opportunity illumination in the MOC image indicates the dunes are <1.5 In to assess the mobility of Martian dunes (at one location) over the high. The images indicate that any movement of these Martian nearly 21 Earth years that separate the Viking and MGS dunes is ~0.4mlyr, a rate that is less than the documented missions. movement of comparable dunes on Eatth by a factor of up to 200. The Aihcnjn Fosae tlunes acc.lr uithin ;I rig;on i,f 1~0,s tIier~,~rl Procedure inertia. inJir:~tin@that the d~~nt.~ma! hr \tnhili7cd h) n pznnsne dust cover. Alternatively. the saltation threshold was not The Viking image (frame 422810, 8 mlpixel) was processed exceeded significantly at this location in more than 20 years. using lSlS software to provide radiometric calibration, blemish and reseau removal, and geometric rectification into a vertical view (Fig. la). The early morning MOC image (frame SP2- Introduction 502106, 5.6 mlpixel) was flipped along a vertical axis, to account for the mirrored condition of the data, and the brightness levels Dunes were first recognized on Mars in Mariner 9 images were inverted to portray illumination comparable to that of the [McCauley el al., 1972; Culls and Smith, 19731. Large dune mid-afternoon Viking image. The MO,C image was referenced to tields surrounding the north polar region were clearly revealed the rectified Viking image using features in the highland knobs both in Mariner 9 [Culls er al., 19731 and Viking images [Cults er exposed around the dunes (Fig. Ib). The best registration ul., 1976; Tsour et ol., 19791, and numerous intracrater dune occurred around a Y-shaped dune field (to the lower left of center fields occur throughout the high latitudes of the southern in Fig. I), where highland knobs on three sides of the dunes hemisphere [Thomas, 1981; Greeley el al., 19921. Nominal produced registration better than one pixel. A difference image Viking Orbiter resolution during the primary missions (-40 of these dunes showed no systematic trends. 'The dune crest mipixel) made identification of slip faces difficult except on the locations from the high fidelity MOC image were overlain onto largest dunes, but different seasonal illuminations led to the the corresponding pan of the Viking image (Fig. 2), which interpretation that some of the north polar dunes mdy be active indicated that the dune locations are cunsistent bztween the two [Tsoar el 01, 19791. Infrared measurcmcnts of low albedo dune images to within one (Viking) pixel, or <8 m. patches, present mostly on the floors of impact craters throughout the highlands, documented the tine to coarse sand size of these materials [Edgerr and Christensen, 1991, 19941. Results The highest resolution Viking images (
Figure I. a) Portion of Viking image 422810 showing dunes in the Aclrenrrl Fussac region of Mars. The image was radiometrically calibrated, had blemishes removed, and was geometrically rectified with north to the top (8 mipixel, slant range 325 km, solar incidence angle 62.S0, local solar time 15.36 H, takcn on Nov. 3, 1977, centered on 38.3"N, 134.9'W). b) Portion of MOC image SP2-502106 The MOC image was referenced to the Viking image using only features in the highland knobs exposed around the dunes. The image was flipped left to right to account for the mirrored state of the data, and the brightness values were inverted to portray illumination conditions comparable to that in the Viking image (MOC image has 5.6 mipixel, slant range 1500 km. solar incidence angle 85.4", local solar time 6.21 H, taken on Aug. 20, 1998). ZIMBELMAN: NON-ACTIVE DUNES IN THE ACHERON FOSSAE REGION OF MARS 1071
Figure 2. Comparison of Acheron Fossae dunes in MOC and Viking images. The area shown is -800 m wide, and it is from the lower left of center in Figure I,where the dunes are surrounded on three sides by highland knobs. a) Purlior~of referenced MOC image of dunes on thc valley floor between highland knobs, b) Overlay of MOC dune crests (black lincs) on corresponding part of Viking image. The lines mark the transition from light to dark along individual dunes in part a.
mechanism for stabilization comes from the observation that the Kharga region of Egypt [Embabi , 19821 result in the following Acheron Fossae dunes are within a large area of low thermal linear regression: inertia [Chrixtenxen rmd Moore, 19921. The dunes may be c,= 106.1 16.6 h - (2) covered by a dust layer that effectively separates the wind from where c4 is the dune movement rate (mlyr) for dunes <4 m high the dune materials, but which is thin enough to not be visible in (with a correlation coefficient of -0.76). Equation 2 indicates that the MOC image. Without the presence of saltating sand or a dune 1.5 m high should move at a rate of 81 mdyr, while a dune abundant roughness elements (excluded by the low rock 1.0 m high would move at a rate of 90 mlyr, for wind conditions abundance), dust is extremely difficult to remobilize by the action representative of Peru and Egypt. The Martian dunes thus could of the wind alone [Greeley el al., 19921. A pervasive dust cover move at a rate of >80 mlyr under sand flow conditions like those at Acheron Fossae is also consistent with the high albedo of the in Peru and Egypt; this rate is 200 times greater than the region [Christensen and Moore, 19921. maximum rate inferred for the Acheron Fossae dunes. Ihe thin If the dunes are not stabilized. an alternative interpretation is Martian atmosphere could increase this difference to a factor of that the threshold friction speed was not exceeded at this site 2000. during the 21 Earth years separating the Viking and MOC Clearly Earth and Mars do not have equivalent wind regirnes, images. This situation seems unlikely for most aeolian settings on so that Mars may not experience Earth-like sand-driving winds. Earth but it is at least a viable possibility for Mars. Threshold The higher threshold friction speed on Mars likely corresponds to friction speeds were only barely reached during 6 Earth years of a greatly reduced amount of time during wliich the wind exceeds monitoring at the Viking I landing site [Greeley et a/, 19821, and this speed. However, whenever the threshold speed is exceeded may not have been reached during 4 Earth years at the Viking 2 on Mars, dune migration should be very rapid. Assuming that the landing site, even during the height of global dust storms [Ryan threshold friction speed was exceeded for some period of time und Henry, 19791. More recently, the Mars Pathfinder site during the interval between the two images, the Acheron Fossae showed simi!ar relatively low wind spccd during three months of dunes may not have moved because they were stabilized. observations [Schofield et al., 19971. These lander observations The Martian dunes certainly are not stabilized by vegetation, are consistent with saltation modeling bascd on GCMs which as arc the similar-sized transverse dunes in the Mojave Desert concludc that the obscrvcd distribution of dunes on Mars [Zimbelman et al., 19951, but other natural agents could stabilize compares favorably with wind stress threshold values a factor of the dunes. "Rock" abundance, determined from multi- two lower than the lowest theoretical dynamic threshold value. wavelength thermal inhared observations made by the Viking implying it is difficult to form the present sand distribution under orbiters, are low in the Acheron Fossae area (<5%), similar to current conditions [Anderson er al., 19991 It therefore remains a values throughout the surrounding region [Christensm and distinct possibility that the dunes at Acheron Fossae did not move Moore, 19921. It is difficult to explain the presence of rocks on simply because the local winds never blew strong enough to the dunes in sufficient quantity to stabilize them. An alternative initiate saltation under current atmospheric conditions. 1072 ZIMBELMAN: NON-ACTIVE DUNES IN TH E ACHERON FOSSAE REGION OF MARS
The wonderful MOC narrow angle images hold great potential Greeley, R., M. Krafl, R. Sullivan,G. Wilson, N. Bridges, K. Herkenhoff, for studying aeolian features on Mars. Researchers should watch R. 0. Kumin, M. Malin, and W. Ward, Aeolian features and prucrssea at the Mars Pathfinder landing rite, J. Gcophys. Rss., 104, for additional locations on Mars where dune mobility between 8573-8584, 1999. the Viking and MGS eras can be assessed, particularly at any Hastenrath, S, L., The harchans ofthe Arequipa region, southern Peru, locations outside ofthe low thermal inertia regions. ZeilflrGeom., 11,300-331, 1967. Arknowledgements. The author is greatly indebted to Dr. Ken Edgett Inman, D. L., G. C. Ewing and J. B. Corliss, Coastal sand dunes of (Malin Space Science Systems) who targeted the MOC image discussed Guerrem Negro, Baja California, Mexico, Geol. Soe. Am. BUN. 77, here, and who then told me about it when the data were released. 787-802. 1966. Comments by Nathan Bridges and an anonymous reviewer were very Long, J. T. and R. P. Sharp, Barchan-dune movement in Imperial Valley, helpful in improving the manuscript. Andrew Johnston (CEPS) carried California, Geol Soc Am. Bull, 75, 149-156, 1964. out the image processing and registration. This work was supported by Malin, M. C., and IS others, Early views of the Martian surface from the NASA grant NAG5-4586. Mars Orbiter Camera ofMars Global Surveyor, Science, 279, 1681- 1685, 1998. McCaulev. J. F.. M. H. Carr. J. A. Cuns. W. K. Hamnann. H. Masurskv. References I) J ~~lton.R P Sharp, and U L' Wilhelms, Prelnn~nary~artnci9 report un thc gculug) of Mar,. lcurus 17,289-327. 1972. Albee, A. I..,F D. Palluconi, and R. E. Arvidson, Mars Global Surveyor hon~r.R M , Barchan duwr t>l'lmper~alVallr.), Caltfom~a.J (;PO/. 74. Mission: Overview and status, Science, 279, 1671-1672, 1998. 292-306, 1966. Anderson, F. S., R. Greeley, P. Xu, E. Lo, D. G. Blumberg, R. M. Ryan, J.A., and R. M. Henry, Man atmospheric phenomena during major Haberle, and J. R. Murphy, Assessing the Martian surface distribution dust storms, as measured at the surface, J. tieophvs. . Res., 84,2821- ofaeolian sand using a Mars general circulation model, J Geophys 2829, 1979. Res, 104. 18,991-19.002. 1999. Schofield. J. T . J R. Barnes. D. Criso. R. M. Haberle. S. I.arsen. J. A Bagnold, R. A,, The physics ofblo~vnsandanddeserl dunes, Chapman \lagalltdo J R Murph). A SelK and ti U tlm. lhc Mar, and Hall, London, 265 p., 1941. Pathtindtr armuspherlc st~cturcin\c,tlgation mclcorology Cults, J. A,, and R. S. U. Smith, Aeolian depasits and dunss on Mars, J. (ASTIMET) experiment, Sclence, 278, 1752-1758, 1997. Geophy.7 Rer . 78,4139-4154, 1973. Smith, P.H., and 25 others, Results from the Mars Pathfinder Camera, Cuns, J.A., K. R. Blasius, G. A. Briggs, M. H. Carr, R. Greeley, and H. Science, 278, 1758-1765, 1997. Masursky, North polar region of Mars: Imaging results tiom Viklng 2, Smith. B. A,. New Man imaees reveal active surface omcesses.Av. Week Science, 194, 1329-1337, 1976. &space Tech., 151(7), (iugust 16 issue), 22-24, i999. Christcnsen, P.R., and H. J. Moore, The Martinn surface layer, in Mars Snydcr, C. W., The extended mission ofViking, J. Geophys. Rex., 84, (H.H. Kieffer, B. M. Jakosky, C. W. Snyder, and M. S. Matthews, 7017.7977. - .. . - - -, .1979- . - Eds.), pp. 686-729, Univ. of Arizona Pr., Tucson, 1992. Thomas, P. C., North-south asymmetry of ealian features in MarIian polar Cooke, R. U., and A. Warren, Geomorphology in deserts, Univ. of regions: Analysis based on crater-related wind markers, lcanrr, 48, California Press, Dsrkeley, CA, 394 p., 1973. 76-90, 1981 Edgen, K. S., and P. R. Christensen, The particle size of Martian aeolian Troar. H.. R. Gnclcv. and A. R. Pcterfnund. Mars: Thc north wlar sand dunes, J. Geophys. Rex, 96,22,765-22,776, 1991 sea and related 2nd panems, J. Geophy; Res., 84.8167-8i82. 1979. Edgen, K. S., and P. R. Christensen, Mars aeolian sand: Regional White, B. R., Soil transport by winds on Mars, J. Geophys. Res, 84, variations among dark-hued crdler floor kalures, J tirvphys. Kes., 99, dM7.dh5l. .- . - ., .1979- . ,. 1997-2018, 1994. Zimbelman, J. R.,Spatial resolution and the geologic interpretation of Embabi, N. S . Barchans of the Kharga depression, in Deserr landforms of Martinn morphology: lmplicetions for subsurfme volatiles, Tearus, 71, sourh~vesrEgypl: A basisfor comparison with Mars (F. El-baz and T. 257-267, 1987. A. Maxwell, Eds.), NASA CR-3611, pp. 141-155, 1982. Zimbelman, J. R., S. H Williams, and V. P. Tchakerian, Sand transport Finkel, H. J., The barchans of southern Peru, J. Geol., 67,614-647, 1959. paths in the Mojave Desert, southwestern United States, in Desert Greeley, R., and J. D. Iversen, Windosageolog;calprocerr on Eorlh, Aeo1;an Processes, V. Tchakerain, Ed.), pp. 101-129, Chapman and Mars, Venus and Titan, Cambridge Univ. Pr., New York, 333 p., Hall, New York, 1995. 1985. Greelev. R... R. N. Leach. S. H. Williams. B. R. Whlte. J. B. Pollack. D. J R Llnlbelman, C'CPSNASM hlKC' 313. Smllhronlsn Inslltullon, II hrtnile). nnd J K \lonhnll. llnte of\r~ndabrojldn on hlrr>..l Wsrhlnglon. I)('2US60-0115 tc-moll jngcepr norm edul (;rophw. Rrr .a'. IO.UU9-IU U21. 1982 Greelej. R . 5 II U 1ll~am5and J R \Isrrhrll. Veloat~ciol'pan~cle~in (Received July 12, 1999: revised August 30, 1999; saltation: Preliminary laboratoty and field measurements, in Eolian accepted Januaty 24,2000) sedrment~ond~rocesses, .PP. . 133-148, Elsveir, New York, 1983. Greelev. R.. N. Lancaster. S. Lee. and P. Thomas. Martian aeolian Copyright 2000 by the American Geohysical Union tuocescs ,cJ~mcnts,and fcdlurc,. 10 \I.nr H H hcnir, Fl M JakosL) (' U 'in)dsr. and U S hl~llhtu,. l:d. ,.pp 731J.7ho. Paper number 1999GLW8399 L'nn olhrtzdna Pr , l ucsun. 1992 0094-8276/99/1999GL008399S05500