Star Fleet Battles Table of Contents R5.0 Kzinti
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’S War Against Caribbean Oil
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’s War Against Caribbean Oil Bercuson, David J.; Herwig, Holger H. University of Calgary Press Bercuson, D. J. & Herwig, H. H. "Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’s War Against Caribbean Oil". Beyond Boundaries: Canadian Defence and Strategic Studies Series; 4. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49998 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com LONG NIGHT OF THE TANKERS: HITLER’S WAR AGAINST CARIBBEAN OIL David J. Bercuson and Holger H. Herwig ISBN 978-1-55238-760-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. -
Megatraveller'
MEGATRAVELLER' OF THE SHATTERED IMPERIUM he Imperial Navy never planned for the worst of all possible contingen- cies: a far-flung Rebellion that would shatter the empire into squab- bling factions. And with each faction went a portion of the navy's fighting strength. Now, Imperial ship fights Imperial ship as the Rebellion drives the entire Imper- ium into chaos. Fighting Ships of the Shattered Imperium is a compendium of immense battle- ships and cruisers that served with the Imperial fleet and now serve with the fleets of the many factions of the Rebellion. Included in this book are standard statistical descriptions of 58 ships, with illustrations for 16 of the most interesting. 0 Battleships and dreadnoughts from tech level 11 to 15. Examples include battle tenderhider systems for tech levels 14 and 15. 0 Cruisers, including the standard cruisers from tech level 11 to 15, plus strike cruisers, missile cruisers, and the jump-6Sample rift cruiser.file 0 Carriers, from the standard fleet carriers to the newest light Carrie! and pocket carrier. 0 Escorts, from the ED-series escort destroyers to the escort fleet and escort missile ships that maneuver with the fleet. 0'Auxiliaries, from the standard fleet tankers to the dromedary combination tanker and resupply ship, plus the rift tanker for operations in the Rifts. Fighting Ships of the Shattered Imperium-a com- pendium of 58 starships for MegaTraveller. intended for MegaTraveller referees and players. ' Intermediate complexity. Suitable for some solitaire use. Requires the MegaTraveller role-playing game system . 0218 10.00 Made in the U.S.A. -
David Hyson, Seaman Uss Kirk – ’75 Rescue
DAVID HYSON, SEAMAN USS KIRK – ’75 RESCUE David Hyson: My name is David Hyson. My last name is spelled H-Y-S-O-N. Where I currently live? Producer: Where do you live now? David Hyson: I live in Rockfield, Maryland. Producer: What was your tour in the service, branch and tour and year? David Hyson: I was in the US Navy. I went into the US Navy on September 21st of 1972 shortly after I turned 18 years old. I was discharged from the Navy in July of 1976. I was discharged about 2 to 3 months early because there was an early dismissal program if I was going to be going into college, and so I was going into college and so I had an early dismissal. Producer: [inaudible 00:00:47] David Hyson: I grew in Baltimore, Maryland. In Parkfield section of Baltimore, Maryland. How I ended up in the navy, my father was in the Navy. So, I decided that I really didn't know what I wanted to do after I graduated from high school so the best thing for me to do would likely be to spend some time in the military to get my head together you might say. Then, I knew by the time I got out of the military I'd probably know what I wanted to do. That was being an account. Well I knew that I could be in involved in it. That's the reason why I joined the US Navy because I knew if I had a good chance of not being involved in conflict would probably be the Navy because the Navy was off shore at that point. -
SOME REVISIONIST HISTORY in the BATTLE of the ATLANTIC Fraser M. Mckee
SOME REVISIONIST HISTORY IN THE BATTLE OF THE ATLANTIC Fraser M. McKee Most historians decry historical revision undertaken solely for political aims. The past Soviet tendency to do this has caused much derision, even domestically; under a new regime, this provides considerable scope even to their historians. In addition, many scholars respond negatively to the all too-common practice of second-guessing the commanders of the day. Yet some cases remain controversial, as shown by a recent reassessment of Admiral Lord Mountbatten's personal responsibility for the disastrous raid on Dieppe in 1942.1 But because of the availability of huge quantities of former enemy documents, some naval history is rightly being rewritten to revise erroneous wartime judgements. This is certainly the case in assessing credits for the destruction in World War II of German U-Boats and Italian sommergibili. The British Ministry of Defence's (MOD) Historical Section has been re-examining all the supposed submarine kills during the Second World War in the Atlantic and Mediterranean theatres, matching Allied records to the German and Italian. In the modern age, this process has been facilitated substantially by using computers to search for discrepancies in the recorded details from both sides. Special attention can then be directed to those kills in which there was no concrete proof of which submarine was sunk, or even whether a sinking occurred. In many cases prisoners were taken, or sufficient debris collected, to identify U-boats with precision, even given the possibility that a struggling submerged boat might eject debris to mislead its attackers. -
Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
-- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type -
USN Ship Designations
USN Ship Designations By Guy Derdall and Tony DiGiulian Updated 17 September 2010 Nomenclature History Warships in the United States Navy were first designated and numbered in system originating in 1895. Under this system, ships were designated as "Battleship X", "Cruiser X", "Destroyer X", "Torpedo Boat X" and so forth where X was the series hull number as authorized by the US Congress. These designations were usually abbreviated as "B-1", "C-1", "D-1", "TB-1," etc. This system became cumbersome by 1920, as many new ship types had been developed during World War I that needed new categories assigned, especially in the Auxiliary ship area. On 17 July 1920, Acting Secretary of the Navy Robert E. Coontz approved a standardized system of alpha-numeric symbols to identify ship types such that all ships were now designated with a two letter code and a hull number, with the first letter being the ship type and the second letter being the sub-type. For example, the destroyer tender USS Melville, first commissioned as "Destroyer Tender No. 2" in 1915, was now re-designated as "AD-2" with the "A" standing for Auxiliary, the "D" for Destroyer (Tender) and the "2" meaning the second ship in that series. Ship types that did not have a subclassification simply repeated the first letter. So, Battleships became "BB-X" and Destroyers became "DD-X" with X being the same number as previously assigned. Ships that changed classifications were given new hull numbers within their new designation series. The designation "USS" standing for "United States Ship" was adopted in 1907. -
Seasprite to Sea King: the Royal Canadian Navy's
Seasprite to Sea King: The Royal Canadian Navy’s Ship-borne Antisubmarine Helicopter Capability ne of the better-known achievements of the post-war Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) is the Ointegration of the large Sikorsky Sea King antisubmarine helicopter into small surface escorts. Of this, “radical and entirely Canadian development,” Tony German writes that it was, “hugely admired” by other navies and that, “[a]fter eight years’ development Canada’s navy on its own brought a whole new dimension in anti-submarine [sic] warfare to the navies of the world,”1 yet the remainder of his publication, The Sea Is at Our Gates, pays little deference to this accomplishment. By Lieutenant(N) Jason Delaney 18 THE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FORCE JOURNAL VOL. 2 | NO. 4 FALL 2013 Understandably, there is very little mention The Politics of Procurement using the Sea of it in the final chapter of A History of King acquisition and the New Ship-borne Canadian Naval Aviation because Kealy and Helicopter Project as the basis for a case study. Russell were still writing while the helicopter/ Undoubtedly, however, the seminal work on destroyer concept was being developed. What this topic was done by Sean Cafferky, who is is more curious is that the proceedings of largely responsible for opening a great deal successive naval history conferences do not of the classified material. As a result, his cover the topic sufficiently or at all. Both publication, Uncharted Waters, is the first full RCN in Retrospect and RCN in Transition treatment of the development of the ship-borne -
Historical Review of Cruiser Characteristics, Roles and Missions
Ser 05D /68 28 March 2005 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF CRUISER CHARACTERISTICS, ROLES AND MISSIONS SFAC Report Number 9030-04-C1 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited FUTURE CONCEPTS AND SURFACE SHIP DESIGN GROUP (05D) NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND 1333 ISAAC HULL AVENUE S.E. WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, D.C. 20376 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 12/31/04 Ship Mission Study 04/04-12/04 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER A Historical Review of Cruiser Characteristics, 5b. GRANT NUMBER Roles and Missions 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 0603563N S2196 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Sean Walsh, lead author, and a team of experts 5e. -
A Study of the World's Naval Surface-To-Air Missile Defense Systems
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 A study of the world's naval surface-to-air missile defense systems. Saraparung, Sukij http://hdl.handle.net/10945/19583 DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE £ Z MONTEREY, CALIFORIJI ' 3 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS A STUDY OF THE WORLD'S NAVAL SURFACE--TO -AIR MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS by Sukij Saraparung December 198 4 Thesis Ad visor: Robert E. Ball Approved for public release; distribution unlimited T223025 Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Ents READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM I. REPORT NUMBEI 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 4. TITLE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT 4 PERIOD COVEREO A Study of the World's Naval Master's Thesis; December 1984 Sur face-to-Air Missile Defense Systems 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTHORCs; 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERS Saraparung, Sukij 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS Naval Postgraduate School Monterev, CA 9 394 3 II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND AODRESS 12. REPORT DATE Naval Postgraduate School December 19 8 4 13. NUMBER OF PAGES 9 3943 Monterey, CA 236 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 AOOHESS(lt different from Controlling Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (ot this report) Unclassified 16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol this Report) Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abstract entered In Block 20, It different from Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS fConlinue on reverse aide II necessary and Identity by block number) Shipborne Sur face-to-Air Missile (SAM) 20. -
Star Fleet Battles Table of Contents R13.0
STAR FLEET BATTLES TABLE OF CONTENTS R13.0 THE INTERSTELLAR CONCORDIUM MODULE C2 R13.1A ISC BACKGROUND R13.1B ISC ECHELON TACTICS R13.1C ISC REAR-FIRING PLASMA TORPEDOES R13.1D ISC SHIP NOTES R13.1D1 ISC NAME R13.1D2 ISC SHIPS R13.1D3 ISC BALCONY R13.1D4 ISC FLEETS R13.1D5 ISC PPD LIMIT R13.1D6 ISC ESCORTS R13.1E ISC CAMPAIGN ORDER OF BATTLE R13.1E1 ISC GENERAL DATA R13.1E2 ISC ORDER OF BATTLE FOR Y169 R13.1E3 ISC ORDER OF BATTLE FOR Y186 R13.R ISC FLEET REFITS R13.R1 ISC PHASER-3 REFIT R13.R2 ISC REAR PLASMA TORPEDO REFIT R13.R3 ISC PLASMA-S REFIT R13.2 ISC DREADNOUGHT (DN) MODULE J R13.3 ISC HEAVY CARRIER (CVA) MODULE K R13.4 ISC SPACE CONTROL SHIP (SCS) MODULE C2 R13.5 ISC FLAGSHIP CRUISER (CC) R13.6 ISC STAR CRUISER (CA) R13.7 ISC CARRIER (CV) R13.8 ISC STRIKE CARRIER (CVS) R13.9 ISC LIGHT CRUISER (CL) R13.10 ISC LIGHT CARRIER (CVL) R13.11 ISC STRIKE CRUISER (CS) R13.12 ISC LIGHT STRIKE CARRIER (CVS) R13.13 ISC SURVEY CRUISER (SR) R13.14 ISC HEAVY SCOUT (HSC) MODULE K R13.15 ISC PF TENDER (PFT) MODULE C2 R13.16 ISC DESTROYER LEADER (DDL) R13.17 ISC DESTROYER (DD) R13.18 ISC SCOUT (SC) R13.19 ISC MINESWEEPER (MS) R13.20 ISC FRIGATE (FF) R13.21 ISC POLICE CORVETTE (POL) R13.22 ISC FLEET TUG (Tug) R13.23 ISC CARGO POD (P-C) R13.24 ISC TRANSPORT POD (P-T) R13.25 ISC BATTLE POD (P-B) R13.26 ISC REPAIR POD (P-R) MODULE R4 R13.27 ISC ESCORT CRUISER (CE) R13.27A ISC AEGIS CRUISER (CEA) R13.28 ISC DESTROYER ESCORT (DE) R13.28A ISC AEGIS DESTROYER (DEA) R13.29 ISC ESCORT FRIGATE (FFE) R13.29A ISC AEGIS FRIGATE (FFA) R13.30 ISC ESCORT CARRIER -
Starship Name Registry
STARSHIP NAME REGISTRY Editor’s Notes, 4 April 14 Edition This list is not complete and a few products have never had their ship name data imported into it. Players are welcome to send to ADB their comments, reports, additions, and corrections for this listing. To be used, they must be in the following specific format: [NAME] (the name of the ship) [PRODUCT] (the specific product in which it is printed, [PAGE] the page number in that product. If you notice that an entire product is missing (for example, Module R9) then do not do line items, just tell us what products are missing and we will do them the normal way. I am fully aware that there are a lot of “format issues“ (things in various point sizes, bold or not, italic or not, all caps or not, spelled out or not) and do not plan to waste time on these (at least now). So you don’t need to waste your time giving me a list of things which need to be in different point sizes or upper case or lower case or whatever. The point of this document is to get information into the hands of players, and since we’re not changing money for it, we cannot afford to spend employee time fixing such things (as they have no bearing on the information, they just make it look pretty). You are welcome to submit new ship names, marking those that you actually use in your campaigns (and any special requests) so that we can accommodate these if possible. -
Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress
Order Code RL33946 Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress Updated June 13, 2007 Ronald O’Rourke Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress Summary Some Members of Congress, particularly on the House Armed Services Committee, have expressed interest in expanding the use of nuclear power to a wider array of Navy surface ships, especially the Navy’s planned CG(X) cruiser. The Navy wants to procure the first CG(X) in FY2011, and is currently studying design options for the ship, including the use of nuclear power. A 2006 Navy study concluded the following, among other things: ! In constant FY2007 dollars, building a Navy surface combatant or amphibious ship with nuclear power rather than conventional power would add roughly $600 million to $800 million to its procurement cost. ! The total life-cycle cost of a nuclear-powered medium-size surface combatant would equal that of a conventionally powered medium- size surface combatant if the cost of crude oil averages $70 per barrel to $225 per barrel over the life of the ship. ! Nuclear-power should be considered for near-term applications for medium-size surface combatants. ! Compared to conventionally powered ships, nuclear-powered ships have advantages in terms of both time needed to surge to a distant theater of operation for a contingency, and in terms of operational presence (time on station) in the theater of operation. In assessing whether the CG(X) or other future Navy surface ships should be nuclear-powered, Congress may consider a number of issues, including cost, operational effectiveness, ship construction, ship maintenance and repair, crew training, ports calls and forward homeporting, and environmental impact.