The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: a Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: a Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets Canadian Military History Volume 13 Issue 3 Article 2 2004 The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: A Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets Richard Goette Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Richard Goette "The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: A Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets." Canadian Military History 13, 3 (2004) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: A Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm A Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets Richard Goette s the international situation continued to In Canada, though, the development of military Adeteriorate during the summer of 1939, the aviation was focused on the growth of a maritime Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) had to think air force only. Although the last few days of the seriously about how it would fight a war against First World War had seen the creation of the Germany. Since the threat to Canada from navy’s Royal Canadian Naval Air Service, the German bombers was relatively low, the air force war ended before its aircraft could be put into came to realize that the principal responsibility operation on the east coast, and this naval air for its organization on the east coast, Eastern element was soon lost in the budget cuts of the Air Command, would be maritime defence and immediate post-war Canadian Government.3 that this required intimate cooperation with Instead, responsibility for air coverage over water the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN).1 Realizing in Canada fell to the Canadian Air Force, which just how important the assistance given to the later became the Royal Canadian Air Force. As navy was, the Air Officer Commanding Eastern a result, by late 1939, maritime air duties on Air Command, Group Captain N.R. Anderson, Canada’s east coast fell to the Royal Canadian stressed that it was absolutely vital that Eastern Air Force’s Eastern Air Command. Air Command’s Maritime Patrol Squadrons do an adequate job of assisting the navy by providing During the war, the Germans operated their air coverage for convoys. “Otherwise,” he warned, submarines, known as U-boats, at night and in “through lack of the necessary cooperation an groups called “wolf packs” against Allied convoys, attempt may be made by the Navy at some future and they did so with much success.4 As shipping date to develop their own Air Arm as had been losses continued to rise throughout 1941 and done in the United Kingdom and the U.S.A.”2 1942, the Western Allies began to explore options on how to stem German U-boat attacks. They Indeed, military aviation for use over the sea all agreed on the need for more air coverage for had seen a different development in Canada convoys. Aircraft were one of the key weapons than it did in Britain or the United States. These employed by the Allies in the war against the latter countries had developed both maritime U-boats. Indeed, a U-boat could not surface in air forces, that is, aircraft under the command the presence of an enemy aircraft for fear of it of the country’s respective air forces, as well as either alerting nearby naval vessels to its presence naval air services, which are aircraft under the or being attacked with air-launched weapons.5 command of the navy and which operate largely Air coverage for the defence of convoys could from aircraft carriers. either be in the form of shore-based aircraft, © Canadian Military History, Volume 13, Number 3, Summer 2004, pp.5-13. 5 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2004 1 Canadian Military History, Vol. 13 [2004], Iss. 3, Art. 2 commanded by the air force, or aircraft from the first escort carrier, HMS Audacity. This naval vessels in the form of small escort carriers. Royal Navy vessel commenced operations in the These vessels were merchant ships fitted with defence of convoys in the autumn of 1941. Almost a flight deck and re-commissioned as auxiliary immediately she demonstrated her value in the aircraft carriers. They played a multitude of defence of shipping. While providing protection roles, of which perhaps the most important was for a convoy to Gibraltar, Audacity’s aircraft to accompany Allied convoys on their voyages fought off German aircraft and also reported and across the North Atlantic. attacked four U-boats that had been shadowing HMS Audacity, a Royal Navy escort carrier, proved the value of such a ship in defending convoys. However, the vessel also displayed the vulnerability of such a high-value target. Escort carriers could stay with the convoy at all the convoy.7 Nonetheless, as a vessel operating times and provide immediate air coverage for a with a convoy, Audacity was also a ripe target great span of time. The air force’s shore-based for the German submarines, and she was aircraft did not share this advantage due to their subsequently sunk by a U-boat only a couple of need to travel between their base and the convoy. days after she had so effectively driven off the first This meant a limited number of hours when they attack of German submarines.8 It was with these could operate around a convoy. The inclusion of issues in mind that the idea for a Royal Canadian escort carriers in a convoy also allowed Western Navy air arm developed. Approaches Command in Britain to route shipping directly, thereby shortening the voyage, One of the first individuals to spur serious instead of having it go out of its way to seek the thinking on the establishment of an RCN Air safety of shore-based air cover. Arm to man escort carriers for convoy defence was Commander C. Thompson of the Royal Escort carriers also had their disadvantages. Navy. In September 1942, Thompson, who Navigational difficulties encountered by ship- was the captain of the escort destroyer HMS borne aircraft operating in the cruel North Witherington, circulated a very critical report on Atlantic risked “the possibility of high losses air coverage provided by Eastern Air Command. through pilots being unable to return to their Stating that the current efforts by the RCAF ships.” Other drawbacks included the high cost organization left “much to be desired,” Thompson of maintaining carriers and their vulnerability to argued that “experience during this war fully submarine attack thereby requiring additional confirms that air operations over the sea are ships tasked specifically to protect the carrier far more efficiently carried out by Naval Officers instead of conducting anti-submarine duties.6 who have received air training than by Air Force Indeed, such vulnerability was made all the Officers who are posted for duty in naval co- more apparent by the short wartime career of operation squadrons.”9 One of Thompson’s main 6 https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol13/iss3/2 2 : The RCAF and the Creation of an RCN Air Arm: A Study of the Command and Control of Maritime Air Assets recommendations was that in order for maritime air operations in Canada to be successful, “there needs to be naval influence from top to bottom.” He stressed that it simply was not enough for the Navy to have operational control or direction at the operational headquarters level because it did not ensure competency at the tactical level, and he therefore suggested that “there must be Naval Officers in the aircraft.”10 What Thompson did not appreciate was that having Naval observers in aircraft would have a limited effect on the efficiency of Eastern Right: As Air Officer Commanding the RCAF’s Eastern Air Command in 1939, Group Captain N.R. Anderson (seen here as an Air Commodore later in the war) warned his superiors about the possibility of a navy attempt to wrestle responsibility for convoy air defence from the RCAF if the air force did not carry out this role efficiently. Below: The Air Gap, also known as the “Black Pit,” consisted of a giant hole in the air cover over the main trade routes between Britain and North America that stretched 300 miles across from east to west and 600 miles north to south from Greenland and the Azores Islands. It was here where U-boats conducted their surface operations against Museum. Aviation courtesy of the Shearwater Canadian Forces Photo Unit (CFPU) PL1181, convoys without fear of aerial attack. 7 Map drawn by Mike Bechthold ©2004 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2004 3 Canadian Military History, Vol. 13 [2004], Iss. 3, Art. 2 LCMSDS Photograph Collection With additional fuel tanks for added endurance, Very-Long-Range Liberators were the best Maritime Patrol aircraft utilized by the RAF and RCAF for convoy air coverage in the Mid-Atlantic. Air Command operations. At this point in time, Thompson’s report met with much resentment command of the aircraft was vested entirely in from both the RCAF and members from the the pilot with the result that the observer, who staff of the Royal Air Force’s (RAF) maritime air was often more capable of making a correct organization, Coastal Command. Commander tactical decision, was left without any executive P.B.
Recommended publications
  • Air Commodore Rob Woods OBE Chief of Staff (Air), Defence Equipment & Support Royal Air Force the Team…
    A Warfighters View: Weapon System Availability – A Collaborative Challenge Air Commodore Rob Woods OBE Chief of Staff (Air), Defence Equipment & Support Royal Air Force The Team….. Air Cdre Rob Woods Mr Richard Hamilton MoD DE&S BAE Systems plc Gp Capt Simon Vicary Mr Geraint Spearing MoD DE&S MoD DECA Mr Ian Manley Mr Ian Cole MoD DE&S MoD DECA UK Defence Equipment & Support (DE&S) “To equip and support our Armed Forces for operations now and in the future” DE&S’s Role • Procure & support equipment, through life, for UK’s Armed Forces for both current & future operations • MOD’s lead department for commercial activities • Manage relationships with MOD, the Front Line & Industry DE&S HQ, MOD Abbey Wood, Bristol, UK DE&S Budget to Spend 2019/20 • £10.8 Billion Core Spend: − £5.4 Billion for Purchase of New Equipment − £5.4 Billion for Equipment Support • £3.9 Billion budget for Air Domain, 56% of which for Support Air Domain Portfolio Backdrop for Transformation in Support: 2000-05 • Strategic Defence Review 1998 • Similar lessons learnt over multiple –Smart Acquisition operations; urgent need to improve • DLO Strategy • Increasing demand for UK military –20% Savings & ‘Transformation capability across the globe Staircase’ • Nature of operations changed • Air & Land End-to-End Review • Defence White Paper 2004 • Need to find efficiencies • Government Efficiency Review 2004 – Preserve current & future capability • Formation of DE&S End-2-End Review of Air & Land Logistics - 2003 • Simplified lines & levels of support - From 4 x Lines of
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual Second Edition April 2021
    UN Military Aviation Unit Manual United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual Second Edition April 2021 Second Edition 2019 DEPARTMENT OF PEACE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONAL SUPPORT UN Military Aviation Unit Manual Produced by: Office of Military Affairs, Department of Peace Operations UN Secretariat One UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017 Tel. 917-367-2487 Approved by: Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations Department of Peace Operations (DPO). Atul Khare Under-Secretary-General for Operational Support Department of Operational Support (DOS) April 2021. Contact: PDT/OMA/DPO Review date: 30/ 04 / 2026 Reference number: 2021.04 Printed at the UN, New York © UN 2021. This publication enjoys copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, governmental authorities or Member States may freely photocopy any part of this publication for exclusive use within their training institutes. However, no portion of this publication may be reproduced for sale or mass publication without the express consent, in writing, of the Office of Military Affairs, UN Department of Peace Operations. ii UN Military Aviation Unit Manual Foreword We are delighted to introduce the United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Aviation Unit Manual, an essential guide for commanders and staff deployed in peacekeeping operations, and an important reference for Member States and the staff at United Nations Headquarters. For several decades, United Nations peacekeeping has evolved significantly in its complexity. The spectrum of multi-dimensional UN peacekeeping operations includes challenging tasks such as restoring state authority, protecting civilians and disarming, demobilizing and reintegrating ex-combatants. In today’s context, peacekeeping missions are deploying into environments where they can expect to confront asymmetric threats and contend with armed groups over large swaths of territory.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS 330 Brochure
    Combat Management System 330 (CMS 330) CMS 330 was developed as a result of 30+ years’ experience and knowledge of Canadian and NATO naval operations. In 2008, Lockheed Martin Canada was selected to design this system as part of Canada’s HALIFAX Class Modernization project. CMS 330 provides the Royal Canadian Navy with the operational ability to carry out multi-mission operations while defending its ships in an ever-evolving, threat environment. The system was also designed as a modern, affordable solution for mid-life upgrades in the international market. A Trusted Solution for Demanding and Complex Surface Ship Missions Open Architecture and ITAR-Free A Fielded and Trusted Solution An affordable and flexible solution CMS 330 is not only proving itself on Canada’s HALIFAX Class with low life-cycle costs, CMS 330 is an Frigates, but it is also the backbone of the technical solution for open-architecture based system which the Royal New Zealand Navy’s ANZAC Frigate System Upgrade, adapts to a variety of subsystems, as well as the command and surveillance management system reducing risk and ensuring delivery for Canada’s new Arctic O-Shore Patrol Ships (AOPS). of unique customer requirements. Benefitting from an active production line, future customers An ITAR-free CMS design allows the will have a ready, continually maturing solution with access international customer to manage and to existing engineering designs and full requirements exploit its full range of capabilities and analysis. This keeps non-recurring engineering costs at an advantages without restriction. absolute minimum. Ease of Implementation, Integration and Maintainability CMS 330 is designed as a Service Oriented Architecture CMS 330 can be scaled for platforms with different system (SOA) based on the Data Distribution System (DDS) limits, operator consoles, and subsystems without major standard, making subsystem weapons and sensor rework to the entire system.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’S War Against Caribbean Oil
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’s War Against Caribbean Oil Bercuson, David J.; Herwig, Holger H. University of Calgary Press Bercuson, D. J. & Herwig, H. H. "Long Night of the Tankers: Hitler’s War Against Caribbean Oil". Beyond Boundaries: Canadian Defence and Strategic Studies Series; 4. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49998 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com LONG NIGHT OF THE TANKERS: HITLER’S WAR AGAINST CARIBBEAN OIL David J. Bercuson and Holger H. Herwig ISBN 978-1-55238-760-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Frank Cooper on Air Force Policy in the 1950S & 1960S
    The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society Copyright © Royal Air Force Historical Society, 1993 All rights reserved. 1 Copyright © 1993 by Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 1993 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Printed by Hastings Printing Company Limited Royal Air Force Historical Society 2 THE PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 11 President: Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Committee Chairman: Air Marshal Sir Frederick B Sowrey KCB CBE AFC General Secretary: Group Captain J C Ainsworth CEng MRAeS Membership Secretary: Commander P O Montgomery VRD RNR Treasurer: D Goch Esq FCCA Programme Air Vice-Marshal G P Black CB OBE AFC Sub-Committee: Air Vice-Marshal F D G Clark CBE BA Air Commodore J G Greenhill FBIM T C G James CMG MA *Group Captain I Madelin Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Group Captain A R Thompson MBE MPhil BA FBIM MIPM Members: A S Bennell Esq MA BLitt *Dr M A Fopp MA PhD FMA FBIM A E Richardson *Group Captain N E Taylor BSc D H Wood Comp RAeS * Ex-officio The General Secretary Regrettably our General Secretary of five years standing, Mr B R Jutsum, has found it necessary to resign from the post and the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander Commodore José António Mirones Spanish Navy Commander of Standing Nato Maritime Group Two (Snmg1)
    COMMANDER COMMODORE JOSÉ ANTÓNIO MIRONES SPANISH NAVY COMMANDER OF STANDING NATO MARITIME GROUP TWO (SNMG1) José António Mirones was born in 1965 and joined the Portuguese Navy Naval Academy in 1983, graduating with the class of 88. After Fleet training, including involvement in disaster relief in the North Sea, in the aftermath of Piper Alfa oil rig disaster, and exchange with the United States Navy, in USS Joseph Hewes, his early years were spent at sea as a bridge watch-keeper, carrying out fishery protection and maritime securityoperations. Principal Warfare Officer in several frigates, was also Head of Department (Operations) and Executive officer with operational deployments to the Adriatic, supporting EU and NATO embargo operations; Mediterranean, namely Operation Enduring Freedom, in the wake of September 11th; Baltic; Artic Ocean and wider Atlantic. He completed the specialist ASW´s course in 1999. Took command of the frigate Bartolomeu Dias, in January 2009, as her first Commanding Officer. Promoted to Captain, acted as CTG (EUROMARFOR TG) for two occasions and, more recently, as Commodore, was the force commander for the EU naval operation ATALANTA, in the Indian Ocean. His staff appointments have included two tours at the Naval Staff (Plans and Policy and External Affairs Division). His last shore assignment was as Military Assistant to the Chief of the Defence Staff. José António Mirones personal decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Cross as well as various campaign ribbons and foreign medals. @NATOMaritimeCommand @NATO_MARCOM @NATO HQ MARCOM Allied Maritime Command I Public Affairs OfficeI [email protected] I www.mc.nato.int.
    [Show full text]
  • TIE Corps Pilot Manual, Emperor's Hammer Training Manual, Etc.)
    1 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Chain of Command III. Structure IV. Positions a. Line Positions Trainee (TRN) Flight Member (FM) Flight Leader (FL) Squadron Commander (CMDR) Wing Commander (WC) b. Flag Positions Commodore (COM) c. TIE Corps Command Staff Combat Operations Officer (COO/TC-3) Strategic Operations Officer (SOO/TC-2) TIE Corps Commander (TCCOM/TC-1) d. Assistants and Other Secondary Positions Squadron Executive Officer (SQXO) Warden of the Imperial Archives (WARD) Editor of the TC Newsletter (EDR) Simulations Officer (SIMS) Captain of the M/FRG Phoenix (CAPT) e. Tour of Duty f. Reserves V. Ranks a. Line Ranks b. Flag Ranks VI. Promotions a. Promotional Authority b. Position Requirements c. Rank requirements d. Promotion to LT e. TIE Corps Core VII. Medals a. Merit Awards Medal of Honor (MoH) Imperial Cross (IC) 3 Order of the Renegade (OoR) Grand Order of the Emperor (GOE) Gold Star of the Empire (GS) Silver Star of the Empire (SS) Bronze Star of the Empire (BS) Palpatine Crescent (PC) Imperial Security Medal (ISM) Imperial Achievement Ribbon (IAR) b. Service Medals Medal of Instruction (MoI) Medal of Tactics (MoT) Medal of Communication (MoC) TIE Corps Commander’s Unit Award (TUA) TIE Corps Meritorious Unit Award (MUA) Iron Star (IS) Legion of Combat (LoC) Legion of Skirmish (LoS) Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) Order of the Vanguard (OV) c. Commendations Commendation of Bravery (CoB) Commendation of Excellence (CoE) Commendation of Loyalty (CoL) Commendation of Service (CoS) Letter of Achievement (LoA) VIII. Procedures a. Appointments b. Transfers c. Promotions and Awards d. Creating Competitions e.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Canadian Air Force's Managed Readiness Plan
    Royal Canadian Air Force’s Managed Readiness Plan Major Marc-André La Haye JCSP 47 PCEMI 47 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2021. ministre de la Défense nationale, 2021. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 47 – PCEMI 47 2020 – 2021 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES – MAÎTRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FORCE MANAGED READINESS PLAN By Major M.A.J.Y. La Haye “This paper was written by a candidate « La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College in stagiaire du Collège des Forces canadiennes fulfilment of one of the requirements of the pour satisfaire à l'une des exigences du Course of Studies. The paper is a cours. L'étude est un document qui se scholastic document, and thus contains rapporte au cours et contient donc des faits facts and opinions which the author alone et des opinions que seul l'auteur considère considered appropriate and correct for appropriés et convenables au sujet. Elle ne the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Realignment and Indian Air Power Doctrine
    Realignment and Indian Airpower Doctrine Challenges in an Evolving Strategic Context Dr. Christina Goulter Prof. Harsh Pant Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs requests a courtesy line. ith a shift in the balance of power in the Far East, as well as multiple chal- Wlenges in the wider international security environment, several nations in the Indo-Pacific region have undergone significant changes in their defense pos- tures. This is particularly the case with India, which has gone from a regional, largely Pakistan-focused, perspective to one involving global influence and power projection. This has presented ramifications for all the Indian armed services, but especially the Indian Air Force (IAF). Over the last decade, the IAF has been trans- forming itself from a principally army-support instrument to a broad spectrum air force, and this prompted a radical revision of Indian aipower doctrine in 2012. It is akin to Western airpower thought, but much of the latest doctrine is indigenous and demonstrates some unique conceptual work, not least in the way maritime air- power is used to protect Indian territories in the Indian Ocean and safeguard sea lines of communication. Because of this, it is starting to have traction in Anglo- American defense circles.1 The current Indian emphases on strategic reach and con- ventional deterrence have been prompted by other events as well, not least the 1999 Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, which demonstrated that India lacked a balanced defense apparatus.
    [Show full text]