3Rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery Regiment 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-50212 15 Nov 2012

U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center Civil War Unit: 3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery Regiment 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-50212 15 Nov 2012 3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery Regiment Barker, Harold R. History of the Rhode Island Combat Units in the Civil War (1861-1865). n.p., 1964. 338 p. E528.4.B3. Denison, Frederic. A Chaplain's Experience in the Union Army. Providence, RI: RI Soldiers & Sailors Historical Society, 1893. 45 p. E464.M5.1991.v35. _____. Shot and Shell: The Third Rhode Island Heavy Artillery Regiment in the Rebellion; Camps, Forts, Batteries, Garrisons, Marches, Skirmishes, Sieges, Battles, and Victories; Also the Roll of Honor.... Providence, RI: Reid, 1879. 368 p. E528.7.3d.D45. Dyer, Frederick H. A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion. Vol. 2. Dayton, OH: Morningside, 1979. pp. 1628-30. E491.D992. (Concise summary of the regiment’s service.) Egan, Patrick. The Florida Campaign with Light Battery C, Third Rhode Island Heavy Artillery. Providence, RI: RI Soldiers & Sailors Historical Society, 1905. 25 p. E464.M5.1991.v37. Irwin, David. Brief Biographical Sketch, Narrative of Service in the Civil War, with the 10th Army Corps, Department of the South, and Army of the James. San Francisco: Privately Printed, 1908. 18 p. E528.7.3rd.I79. James, Martin S. War Reminiscences. Providence, RI: RI Soldiers & Sailors Historical Society, 1911. 38 p. E464.M5.1991.v38. Rhode Island. AGO. Names of Officers, Soldiers and Seamen in Rhode Island Regiments...Who Lost Their Lives in the Defense of Their Country in the Suppression of the Late Rebellion. Providence, RI: Providence Press, 1869. pp. 7-8. E528.3.R45. (list of regimental fatalities). _____. Official Register of Rhode Island Officers and Soldiers Who Served in the United States Army and Navy, from 1861 to 1866. Providence, RI: General Assembly, 1866. pp. 507-78. E528.3.R46. (brief history and roster of the regiment). Williams, Alonzo. The Investment of Fort Pulaski. Providence, RI: RI Soldiers & Sailors Historical Society, 1887. 59 p. E464.M5.1991.v34. Williams, Charles H. The Last Tour of Duty at the Siege of Charleston. Providence, RI: RI Soldiers & Sailors Historical Society, 1882. 29 p. E464.M5.1991.v33. 1 U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center Civil War Unit: 3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery Regiment 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-50212 15 Nov 2012 The following pertinent personal papers are in the Institute's Manuscript Archive: Battery C: X Corps Union Army - CWTIColl (Unidentified soldier's letter from Spring Hill, Dec 2, 1864) Battery E: Keen, Edwin W. - CWDocColl (Sergeant's letter, Dec 20, 1861) Battery H: Clegg, James - CWDocColl (Original & typescript of enlisted man's letter, Oct 30, 1863) Battery K: Union Documents - WalkerColl (Signature of Lieutenant James Richardson, Jun 15, 1862) Battery L: Pratt, James & Charlotte - PrattColl (Obituary of enlisted man, Alonzo Smith, as read at Weymouth Historical Society, Apr 1, 1881) Smith, Alonzo & Jason - SmithColl (Correspondence of enlisted man, Alonzo Smith Apr 9, 1861-Oct 29, 1862) 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Siege of Petersburg
Seige Of Petersburg June 9th 1864 - March 25th 1865 Siege Of Petersburg Butler”s assault (June 9) While Lee and Grant faced each other after Cold Harbor, Benjamin Butler became aware that Confederate troops had been moving north to reinforce Lee, leaving the defenses of Petersburg in a vulnerable state. Sensitive to his failure in the Bermuda Hundred Campaign, Butler sought to achieve a success to vindicate his generalship. He wrote, "the capture of Petersburg lay near my heart." Petersburg was protected by multiple lines of fortifications, the outermost of which was known as the Dimmock Line, a line of earthworks 10 miles (16 km) long, east of the city. The 2,500 Confederates stretched thin along this defensive line were commanded by a former Virginia governor, Brig. Gen. Henry A. Wise. Butler”s plan was formulated on the afternoon of June 8, 1864, calling for three columns to cross the Appomattox and advance with 4,500 men. The first and second consisted of infantry from Maj. Gen. Quincy A. Gillmore”s X Corps and U.S. Colored Troops from Brig. Gen. Edward W. Hinks”s 3rd Division of XVIII Corps, which would attack the Dimmock Line east of the city. The third was 1,300 cavalrymen under Brig. Gen. August Kautz, who would sweep around Petersburg and strike it from the southeast. The troops moved out on the night of June 8, but made poor progress. Eventually the infantry crossed by 3:40 a.m. on June 9 and by 7 a.m., both Gillmore and Hinks had encountered the enemy, but stopped at their fronts.
[Show full text]
RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Stewart L
RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER THIRTY-THREE This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D.C. Price 25 cents. RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia by Joseph P. Cullen NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL HANDBOOK SERIES NO. 33 Washington, D.C., 1961 The National Park System, of which Richmond National Battlefield Park is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. Contents Page Richmond 1 The Army of the Potomac 2 PART ONE THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN, SUMMER 1862 On to Richmond 3 Up the Peninsula 4 Drewry's Bluff 5 Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) 6 Lee Takes Command 9 The Seven Days Begins 12 Beaver Dam Creek (Ellerson's Mill) 13 Gaines' Mill 16 Savage Station 18 Glendale (Frayser's Farm) 21 Malvern Hill 22 End of Campaign 24 The Years Between 27 PART TWO THE FINAL STRUGGLE FOR RICHMOND, 1864-65 Lincoln's New Commander 28 Cold Harbor 29 Fort Harrison 37 Richmond Falls 40 The Park 46 Administration 46 Richmond, 1858. From a contemporary sketch. HE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR was unique in many respects. One Tof the great turning points in American history, it was a national tragedy op international significance.
[Show full text]
Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No
Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Chesterfield County, Virginia Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor, Inc. North Shore Commons A 4951 McCormickLake Brook Drive, Taylor Suite 275 NorthGlen ShoreAllen, VirginiaCommons 23060 A 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 275 Glen Allen, VA 23060 May 2013 804-762-5800 May 2013 Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Phase I ArchaeologicalChesterfield County,Identification Virginia Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor NorthMcCormick Shore Commons Taylor, Inc.
[Show full text]
Satin Army Corps System
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS SYSTEM IN THE UNION ARMY Allan Satin, Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, [email protected] © Allan Satin & Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, 2010, www.cincinnaticwrt.org At the end of the American Civil War, the Union Army was organized into army corps each with its own unique number which remained with it even if the corps was transferred from one army to another. How did this system develop in the Union Army? The United States Regular Army had no field commands larger than a regiment when the Civil War broke out in April 1861. Regiments were assigned to geographical departments with no intervening level of command. With the expansion of the armies resulting from the recruitment of the volunteer forces, command levels between the regimental and departmental levels were clearly required. At first, those departments with large enough field forces organized their new regiments into brigades (e.g. May 28 in the Department of Washington). As the forces became larger, divisions were formed (June 11 in the Department of Pennsylvania). The first major campaign was fought with armies organized into divisions (First Bull Run). Military men in the United States were familiar with the corps d’armée system as it had existed in the armies of Napoleon, but conservative commanders such as George B. McClellan and Don Carlos Buell were reluctant to form army corps in the armies under their command. McClellan wanted to postpone the creation of army corps until he had tested his divisional commanders through active operations to see which of them would be capable of commanding at the army corps level.
[Show full text]
Washington National Guard Pamphlet
WASH ARNG PAM 870-1-7 WASH ANG PAM 210-1-7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD PAMPHLET THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN POST WORLD WAR II HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DEPARTMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL CAMP MURRAY, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98430 - i - THIS VOLUME IS A TRUE COPY THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ROSTERS HEREIN HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT ONLY TO PUT EACH UNIT, IF POSSIBLE, WHOLLY ON A SINGLE PAGE AND TO ALPHABETIZE THE PERSONNEL THEREIN DIGITIZED VERSION CREATED BY WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY - ii - INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME 7, HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD BY MAJOR GENERAL HOWARD SAMUEL McGEE, THE ADJUTANT GENERAL Volume 7 of the History of the Washington National Guard covers the Washington National Guard in the Post World War II period, which includes the conflict in Korea. This conflict has been categorized as a "police action", not a war, therefore little has been published by the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army or by individuals. However, the material available to our historian is believed to be of such importance as to justify its publication in this volume of our official history. While Washington National Guard units did not actually serve in Korea during this "police action", our Air National Guard and certain artillery units were inducted into service to replace like regular air and army units withdrawn for service in Korea. However, many Washington men participated in the action as did the 2nd and 3rd Infantry Divisions, both of which had been stationed at Fort Lewis and other Washington military installations.
[Show full text]
RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia
RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia by Joseph P. Cullen (cover of 1961 edition) National Park Service Historical Handbook Series No. 33 Washington, D.C. 1961 Contents a. Richmond b. The Army of the Potomac PART ONE THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN, SUMMER 1862 c. On to Richmond d. Up the Peninsula e. Drewry's Bluff f. Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) g. Lee Takes Command h. The Seven Days Begins i. Beaver Dam Creek (Ellerson's Mill) j. Gaines' Mill k. Savage Station l. Glendale (Frayser's Farm) m. Malvern Hill n. End of Campaign o. The Years Between PART TWO THE FINAL STRUGGLE FOR RICHMOND, 1864-65 p. Lincoln's New Commander q. Cold Harbor r. Fort Harrison s. Richmond Fall's t. The Park u. Administration For additional information, visit the Web site for Richmond National Battlefield Park Historical Handbook Number Thirty-Three 1961 This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D.C. Price 25 cents The National Park System, of which Richmond National Battlefield Park is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director Richmond, 1858. From a contemporary sketch. THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR was unique in many respects.
[Show full text]
"4.+?$ Signature and Title of Certifying Official
NPS Fonn 10-900-b OMB No. 10244018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATIONFORM This form is used for documenting multiple pmpcny pups relating to one or several historic wnvxe. Sainsrmctions in How lo Complele the Mul1,ple Property D~mmmlationFonn (National Register Bullnin 16B). Compleveach item by entering the requested information. For addillanal space. use wntinuation shau (Form 10-900-a). Use a rypwiter, word pmarror, or computer to complete dl ivms. A New Submission -Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Llstlng The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources - B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each acsociated historic conk* identifying theme, gmgmphid al and chronological Mod foreach.) The Civil War in Virginia, 1861-1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources - - C. Form Prepared by -- - nameltitle lohn S. Salmon organization Virginia De~artmentof Historic Resourceg smet & number 2801 Kensineton Avenue telephone 804-367-2323 em. 117 city or town -state VA zip code222l As ~ ~ -~~ - ~ ~~~ -~~ An~~~ ~~ sr amended I the duimated authoriw unda the National Hislaic~.~~ R*urvlion of 1%6. ~ hmbv~ ~~ ccrtih. ha this docummfation form , ~ ,~~ mauthe Nhlond Regutn docummunon and xu forth requ~rnncnufor the Istmg of related pmpnia wns~svntw~thihc~mund Rcglster crivna Thu submiu~onmsm ihc prcce4unl ~d pmfes~onalrcqutmnu uc lath in 36 CFR Pan M) ~d the Scsmar) of the Intenoh Standar& Md Guidelina for Alshoology and Historic Revnation. LSa wntinuation shafor additi01w.I wmmmu.) "4.+?$ Signature and title of certifying official I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
[Show full text]
The Bermuda Hundred Campaign | May 2013
Essential Civil War Curriculum | Daniel F. O’Connell, The Bermuda Hundred Campaign | May 2013 The Bermuda Hundred Campaign By Daniel F. O’Connell In the spring and early summer of 1864 General Ulysses Simpson (Hiram Ulysses) Grant’s Overland Campaign and Major General William Tecumseh Sherman’s Atlanta Campaign justifiably garnered most of the country’s attention. The important nature of their objectives, the enormous stakes invested in the endeavors, and the huge size of the armies involved in these two campaigns overshadowed all other military actions. But these campaigns did not happen in a vacuum. They were just the largest part of Grant’s overall scheme to "concentrate all the force possible against the Confederate Armies in the field." At least three smaller campaigns accompanied these massive efforts. Major General Franz Sigel led a campaign in the Shenandoah Valley; Major General Nathaniel Prentice Banks operated against Mobile, Alabama; and Major General Benjamin Franklin Butler would simultaneously threaten Richmond from the south. As Abraham Lincoln put it when grant outlined the strategy for him at the White House, “Those not skinning can hold a leg.” Similar operations against the Confederate capital had been proposed on at least four other occasions but had been deemed impractical or simply ignored by the administration. Now with the backing of the new commander of the Union armies it would become a reality. Butler would pose the threat by transporting his army from Fort Monroe by water to the area near City Point and establishing a position in the Bermuda Hundred. The tiny peninsula, formed at the confluence of the James and Appomattox Rivers, looked like the perfect spot from which to challenge both Richmond and the railroad system that supplied it.1 Grant knew that it would be politically unacceptable to surrender any territory to the Confederates by vacating the Virginia peninsula for the purpose of consolidating Butler’s force into the Army of the Potomac.
[Show full text]
History of the North Korean Army
• 4 : SECURITY INFORMATION DECLASSIFIED HEADQUARTERS FAR EAST COMMA* MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SECTION, G! REGRADED BY AUTHORITY BY (LA I HISTORY OF THE NORTH KOREAN ARMY History of the North Korean Army 31 Jul 52. This Document IS A HOLDING OF THE ARCHIVES SECTION LIBRARY SERVICES FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS DOCUMENT NO. f4-l6986A COPY NO. Army—CGSC—P2-1798—7 Mar 52—5M SECURI RMATION SECURITY INFORMATION sa. % h c.* o CUT rnkA L STAFF HISTORY OF THE NORTH KOREAN ARMY ;*••« < EflSLmM SECURITY INFORMATION WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18 U.S.C. sect. 793 and 794. Its transmission, or the revelation of its contents in any manner, to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. Under no circumstances shall possession thereof, or the information therein be given to any personnel other than those whose duties specifically require knowledge thereof. When not in use, this document is chargeable to the custody of an officer, See pars, 17, 24, 26, 28, AR 380-5, 6 June 1952. Reproduction of the intelligence in this publication is prohibited without special authority from the AC of S, G-2, HQ, FEC. This document may be released to foreign governments only with the express approval of G-2, FEC. When this document is released to a foreign government, it is released subject to the following conditions: This information is furnished with the understanding that it will not be released to any other nation without specific approval of the United States of America - Department of the Army: that it will not be used for other than military purposes; and that the information will be afforded the same degree of security as afforded by the United States of America - Department of the Army.
[Show full text]
Educator's Guide
ANTIETAM ANIMATED MAP | HIGH SCHOOL LESSON PLAN Educator’s Guide THE CIVIL WAR CURRICULUM: Goals 3 and 4 NCSS GOALS: I, II, IV, V, VI, X GRADES: High School/Advanced Placement APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF TIME : 4 days GOAL: By studying the Battle of Antietam students will gain an appreciation for the responsibility and influence of those in leadership roles. OBJECTIVES: Upon viewing the Civil War Trust’s Animated Map of the Battle of Antietam: 1. Students will be able to verbally discuss key leadership moments throughout the battle, identifying a leader’s influence and analyzing the decisions that were made. 2. Students will be able to identify and list characteristics of good leadership. MATERIALS: Robert E. Lee’s Biography George McClellan’s Biography AP Hill’s Biography Ambrose Burnside’s Biography Military Rank and Organization chart Discussion sheet PROCEDURE: Step 1: Hand out a copy of the Military Rank and Organization chart to each student. Have the students review this document, it is going to come in handy throughout the animated map. Go over the maneuver of “flanking” The Civil War Trust Education | Antietam civilwar.org/antietammapguide “Flanking” an enemy unit was another word for attacking it from the side. Since tactics of the time demanded that soldiers fight in long lines to maximize firepower to their front, a flank attack would put the maximum amount of firepower from the attacking unit against a minimal amount of firepower from the defending unit. Finding and striking the enemy’s flank was the core of Civil War strategy. Hand out and have students read the bios of Robert E.
[Show full text]
National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP List, 2009
Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Updated 19-March-2010 (release letter added to file) Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
[Show full text]
Corps of Engineer Officers for Whom FORMER Streets Were Named by the Manhattan Engineering District but No Biography Could Be Found
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided herein. If you note an error or omission, please contact the City of Richland’s Planning & Redevelopment Office so that a correction can be made. ABBOT STREET HENRY LARCOM ABBOT BORN: August 13, 1831 – Beverly, Massachusetts DIED: October 1, 1927 – Cambridge, Massachusetts ABBOT STREE T HENRY LARCOM ABBOT graduated in 1854 from the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, placing second in his class. He was posted in the Topographical Engineer Corps, where he served until the beginning of the Civil War. During the Battle of First Bull Run on July 21, 1861, he was wounded while serving on the staff of Major General Irwin McDowell. He then served on the staff of the Army of the Potomac's Chief Engineer, Brigadier General John G. Barnard, through the Peninsular Campaign. After a year and a half of staff officer duty he was commissioned colonel and commander of the 1st Connecticut Heavy Artillery regiment in January 1863, and was assigned to the defenses of Washington, D.C., frequently commanding a brigade in the protective fortifications. When the Union forces began the Siege of Petersburg in the summer of 1864, he was detailed to command all the siege artillery throughout the campaign. He was brevetted brigadier general, U.S. Volunteers on August 1, 1864, for "gallant and distinguished services in the operations before Richmond, and especially in the lines before Petersburg, Virginia." On March 13, 1865, he was brevetted brigadier general, U.S. Regular Army and major general, U.S.
[Show full text]