Information to Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the mlcrofihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginnmg at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 TEIREE ARMIES IN KOREA: THE COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED STATES EIGHTH ARMY IN KOREA, JULY 1950-JUNE 1952 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University by Kelly C. Jordan, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1999 Dissertation Committee: Allan R Millett Approved by John F. Guilmartin Jr. Warren Van Tine Adviser Department of History UMI Number: 9931623 Copyright 1999 by Jordan, Kelly C. All rights reserved. UMI Microform 9931623 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Copyright by Kelly C. Jordan L999 ABSTRACT For the first two years of the Korean War, the United. Nations relied largely upon the American Army component of the United States Eighth Army to achieve its political goals. As the entity referred to as the Eighth United States Army in Korea (EUSAK) formed, expanded, and matured, it also changed significantly during the period July 1950 to June 1952. These changes produced three distinct organizations in terms of composition, senior leadership, mission, and method of combat operations. The “first” Eighth Army was the army that fought between 13 July-25 December 1950, whüe the “second” Eighth Army existed during the period 26 December 1950- 12 November 1951, and the “third” Eighth Army came into being during the period 13 November 1951-30 June 1952. While this observation is perhaps not surprising from an organizational point o f view, it challenges a basic and prevailing American view regarding the evolution o f its armies in conflict. This dissertation examines the US Army component of the Eighth United States Army in Korea between July 1950-June 1952 and evaluates it in terms of its combat effectiveness by assessing the six fimdamental elements of combat power, leadership, administration, firepower, maneuver, integration, and protection, using a unique battlefield effectiveness n paradigm to produce an assessment of the Eighth Army’s leadership, battlefield activities, and overall combat eflfectiveness. This assessment also supports the argument that the “second” Eighth Army that fought in Korea was substantially different from the “first” Eighth Army that preceded it and the “third” Eighth Army that succeeded it, and that the second Eighth Army was the most combat effective of the three armies at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels of war. A combination of deliberate reform measures, battlefield opportunities, an influx of excellent soldiers and leaders, and a synergistic effect among all of these occurrences explains the remarkable battlefield performance of this organization, which was perhaps the best American field army between World War II and the Gulf War. m To my father. Dr. John Patrick Jordan, Major, USAR, Retired, for being my role model as a man, soldier, scholar, and father. It was you who inspired me to achieve the things I have, and instilled in me the desire for excellence and to coirçlete my Ph D. and To my wife, Roberta A. Jordan, for being my friend, confidant, helper, wife, and mother of our two wonderful children. Over the last five years, I have spent far too much time in my oflhce and not enough with you and the children. Thanks for picking up my slack, understanding, and helping me complete this project. I owe you both more than I can ever possibly repay, and I am thankful that you have both stuck by me from the beginning of this project to its completion. Your combmed influence helped me to persevere, and this work is a much better product because of your involvement. IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Allan R. Millett, for his intellectual support, encouragement, and guidance that made this dissertation possible, and for his patience in correcting both my stylistic and substantive errors. I also need to thank Mark Jacobson, Alexander Lassner, Lieutenant Colonel David T. Fautua, and Lieutenant Colonel Conrad C. Crane for the innumerable stimulating discussions that I had with them which led me to recognize^ conceptualize, and define many fimdamental aspects of my argument. I could not have completed this project without the direct assistance of my fiiend William R. Roberts on several significant occasions, and I am in his debt as well for his consistent support. I am deeply grateful to my superiors in the Department of History at the United States Military Academy, especially Colonel Robert A. Doughty, Colonel Charles F. Brower IV, Colonel Cole C. Kingseed, and Colonel James M. Johnson. Without their conthuiing interest in my progress and the decisions that they made that provided me with the time, opportunity, and resources to work on this dissertation over the past three years, I am certain that I would not have completed it while at West Point. I am particularly grateful to the support I received J&om the United States Military Academy’s Faculty Development Research Fund, which allowed me to conduct numerous essential research trips to various archival locations. My debt to the two men who inspired me to begin my study of the Korean War and the Eighth Army, as expressed in the dedication of my MA Thesis, remains unchanged. My uncles. First Lieutenant Herbert L. Jordan, USA, Infantry, who, as a member of Conçany L, 8th Cavalry Regiment, First Cavalry Division, gave his life for his country on 18 September 1950 on Hill 403, Tabu-Dong, Korea, and Colonel William S. Jordan, USA, Infantry, whose gallant actions on Heartbreak Ridge between 5 September-6 October 1951 as the commander of Company B, 23d Infantry Regiment, Second hifantry Division, inspired me to study the Korean War, will always be two of my greatest heroes. This work is a personal tribute to them as well Finally, I believe that the writing of history should be both an academic and an artistic undertaking, and the music ofWol%ang Amadeus Mozart, Johaim Pachelbel, Shania Twain, Jewel, Queen, Styx, Mindy McCready, Patty Loveless, and Trisha Yearwood was an integral part of the creative process that produced this work. These particular artists, along with many others, provided me the intellectual stimulation that I needed to persevere during the long and seemingly endless nights of writing, and their contributions were as important to the artistic portion of this work as the primary and secondary sources were to the academic part of this endeavor. Their melodies and voices soothed me, and their lyrics inspired me to continue on my quest to gain a better understanding of the Eighth Army in Korea as an organization and as an eclectic and ever-changmg group of fascinating, conçlex, and heroic individuals. v i VTTA February 12, 1964 .................................... Bom - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma May 17, 1986 ............................................B.A., Virginia Military Insthute, Lexington, Virginia 1986-Present .............................................U.S. Army OfiBcer June 7, 1996 .............................................. M.A., Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio July 6, 1996 ............................................... histructor. Department of EEstory, United States Mihtary Academy, West Point, New York July 1, 1998 ............................................... Assistant Professor, Department of EQstory, United States Mihtary Academy, West Point, New York PUBLICATIONS AND CONFERENCES “The Persistent Prophet: The Role of Percy Hobart in British Armored Warfare Doctrine Development from 1927-1934,” conference paper presented at Theatrum Mhitarum HI Graduate Student Conference in Military History, The Ohio State University, April 21-22, 1995. The Napoleonic Titan: Napoleonic Warfare, Organizations, Operations, Weapons, and Tactics. West Point, NY: United States Military Academy Department of History, 1996. ‘Tilling The Void: Planning And Conducting Small Unit Search-And-Attack Operations,: forthcorning in Editor, West Point Atlas for Warfare Since 1945, in The
Recommended publications
  • Panama Treaty 9 77
    Collection: Office of the Chief of Staff Files Series: Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files Folder: Panama Canal Treaty 9/77 Container: 36 Folder Citation: Office of the Chief of Staff Files, Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files, Panama Canal Treaty 9/77, Container 36 NATIONAL ARCHIVES ANO RECORDSSe'RVIC'E ~~7'",,!:.;, WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIALLlBR~~IESj FORM OF CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE DATE RESTRICTION DOCUMENT caDle American Imbassy Panama to Secretary of State '/27/77 memo Panama Canal treaty negotiations (S PP.) ca. '/27 A memo aicE Inderfurth to IJ '1'/77 A memo Elmer T. Irooks to ZI '1'/77 A ..,b thomson to 3C ..... ~~ I} ~tI~o '/2'/7~ ...... - ----"------,----,---,-,-,---,- ----'-1---'"--''' FILE LOCATION Chief of Staff (Jordan)/lox , of • (org.)/Panama Canal Treaty~Sept. 1'77 RESTRICTION CODES (A) Closed by Executive Order 12065 governing access to national security information. I B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document. IC) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GSA FORM 7122 (REV. 1-81) MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINCTO!': MEMORANDUM TO THE PRESIDENT FROM: HAMILTON JORDAN 1-1.9. DATE: AUGUST 30, 1977 SUBJECT: PANAMA CANAL ENDORSEMENTS 1. The AFL-CIO Executive Council officially adopted :::::',:-·· :.... ·;;h~i: -: a strong statement in favor of the new Panama .~'",. , .:.; Canal Treaties today. Mr. Meany, in a press con­ ference afterwards, said that the resolution "means full support, using whatever influence we have on Fi· Members of Congress - it certainly means lobbying." In addition, we have a commitment from John Williams, ...... President of the Panama Canal Pilots Association, and from Al Walsh of the Canal Zone AFL-CIO, to testify q~11 ~llli, at Senate hearings that the employee provisions / -~ ...
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • A COUNTRY at WAR the ORIGIN, EVOLUTION, and FUTURE of CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS in the UNITED STATES by Joseph Luis Harper Viñas
    A COUNTRY AT WAR THE ORIGIN, EVOLUTION, AND FUTURE OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES by Joseph Luis Harper Viñas A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland December 2018 © 2018 Joseph Luis Harper Viñas All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to study the erosion of civil-military relations in the United States in order to determine whether it affects national security. The overall construct is regarding civil-military relations, not only between civilian and military government officials, but also those relationships with the citizenry in the United States. In order to study this, civil-military relations will be looked at through three different lenses. First of all, it is important to learn about the origins of civil-military relations in the United States and what the Founding Fathers thought of these relations. In order to do this, a look at the separation of powers between the Executive and Legislative branches of government will be examined, as well as what the Founding Fathers felt regarding having a standing army in the United States during times of peace. The second point regarding these relations will be studied by looking at the evolution of civil-military relations with regards to the civil-military gap. Accession numbers provided by the Department of Defense will be analyzed in order to determine if the US military is representative of its citizens. Accession numbers from the post-Vietnam all volunteer force up until recent times will be used.
    [Show full text]
  • TUESDAY, M Y 1, 1962 the President Met with the Following of The
    TUESDAY, MAYMYI,1, 1962 9:459:45 -- 9:50 am The PrePresidentsident met with the following of the Worcester Junior Chamber of CommeCommerce,rce, MasMassachusettssachusetts in the Rose Garden: Don Cookson JJamesarne s Oulighan Larry Samberg JeffreyJeffrey Richard JohnJohn Klunk KennethKenneth ScScottott GeorgeGeorge Donatello EdwardEdward JaffeJaffe RichardRichard MulhernMulhern DanielDaniel MiduszenskiMiduszenski StazrosStazros GaniaGaniass LouiLouiss EdmondEdmond TheyThey werewere accorrpaccompaniedanied by CongresCongressmansman HaroldHarold D.D. DonohueDonohue - TUESDAY,TUESbAY J MAY 1, 1962 8:45 atn LEGISLATIVELEGI~LATIVE LEADERS BREAKFAST The{['he Vice President Speaker John W. McCormackMcCortnack Senator Mike Mansfield SenatorSenato r HubertHube rt HumphreyHUInphrey Senator George SmatherStnathers s CongressmanCongresstnan Carl Albert CongressmanCongresstnan Hale BoggBoggs s Hon. Lawrence O'Brien Hon. Kenneth O'Donnell0 'Donnell Hon. Pierre Salinger Hon. Theodore Sorensen 9:35 amatn The President arrived in the office. (See insert opposite page) 10:32 - 10:55 amatn The President mettnet with a delegation fromfrotn tktre Friends'Friends I "Witness for World Order": Henry J. Cadbury, Haverford, Pa. Founder of the AmericanAtnerican Friends Service CommitteeCOtntnittee ( David Hartsough, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania Senior at Howard University Mrs. Dorothy Hutchinson, Jenkintown, Pa. Opening speaker, the Friends WitnessWitnes~ for World Order Mr. Samuel Levering, Arararat, Virginia Chairman of the Board on Peace and.and .... Social Concerns Edward F. Snyder, College Park, Md. Executive Secretary of the Friends Committe on National Legislation George Willoughby, Blackwood Terrace, N. J. Member of the crew of the Golden Rule (ship) and the San Francisco to Moscow Peace Walk (Hon. McGeorgeMkGeorge Bundy) (General Chester V. Clifton 10:57 - 11:02 am (Congre(Congresswomansswoman Edith Green, Oregon) OFF TRECO 11:15 - 11:58 am H.
    [Show full text]
  • 34-Everett-Declaration-Iso-Mtn
    Case 2:17-cv-01297-MJP Document 34 Filed 09/14/17 Page 1 of 5 1 The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-01297-MJP 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. DECLARATION OF SAMANTHA EVERETT IN SUPPORT OF 13 DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR President of the United States, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 14 Defendants. NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: 15 October 6, 2017 16 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 17 18 I, Samantha Everett, swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States to 19 the following: 20 1. I am counsel of record for Plaintiffs in this action, am over age 18, and competent 21 to be a witness. I am making this Declaration based on facts within my own personal knowledge. 22 I provide this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 23 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Department of Defense 24 Press Briefing by Secretary Carter on Transgender Service Policies, dated June 30, 2016, 25 available at https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript-View/Article/822347/ 26 department-of-defense-press-briefing-by-secretary-carter-on-transgender-service/. 27 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a Statement by 28 Secretary Carter on DOD Transgender Policy, dated July 13, 2015, available at DECLARATION OF SAMANTHA EVERETT IN 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1500 SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR NEWMAN DU WORS LLP Seattle, Washington 98121 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 1 (206) 274-2800 [2:17-cv-01297-MJP] Case 2:17-cv-01297-MJP Document 34 Filed 09/14/17 Page 2 of 5 1 https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/612778.
    [Show full text]
  • Willow House Times
    Willow House Times Issue 38 Cuyahoga Heights Historical Committee November 2015 Village Soldiers - Korean Conflict Inside this issue: Willow House Times 1 Village Soldiers - 1 Korean Conflict Korean Conflict Timeline 2 Pictured above: Lidio M. Angiocchi; Robert T. Angiocchi & Carl Casavecchia We have no pictures of Victor Duber & Dean T. James who were also in the Korean Conflict Timeline 3 service. There may be others that we have no information on that served during the Korean Conflict. The committee would appreciate information & pictures of any Did You Know? 4 village soldiers for our Kennedy House display & the village archives. Historical Committee 4 Meetings 4 Cuyahoga Heights Historical Archives Kennedy House 4651 E 71st Street Home of Historical Committee & Korean War Memorial - Washington D.C. Boy Scouts The 19 stainless steel statues were sculpted by Frank Gaylord of Barre, VT and cast by Tallix Foundries of Beacon, NY. They are approximately seven feet tall and represent Caucasian, Afro-American, Hispanic, Native American & Asian-Americans, a cross section of America. The advance party has 14 Army, 3 Marine, 1 Navy and 1 Air Force members. The statues stand in patches of Juniper bushes and are separated by polished granite strips, which give a semblance of order and symbolize the rice paddies of Korea. The troops wear ponchos covering their weapons and equipment. The ponchos seem to blow in the cold winds of Korea. PAGE 2 WILLOW HOUSE TIMES Korean Conflict Timeline 1894-1895: Sino-Japanese War February 1904: Russo-Japanese War begins September 1905: Treaty of Portsmouth (ends Russo-Japanese War) 1905: Japan makes Korea a protectorate 1910: Japan makes Korea a formal colony.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dmz Tour Course Guidebook
    THE DMZ TOUR COURSE GUIDEBOOK From the DMZ to the PLZ (Peace and Life Zone) According to the Korean Armistice Agreement of 1953, the cease-fire line was established from the mouth of Imjingang River in the west to Goseong, Gangwon-do in the east. The DMZ refers to a demilitarized zone where no military army or weaponry is permitted, 2km away from the truce line on each side of the border. • Establishment of the demilitarized zone along the 248km-long (on land) and 200km-long (in the west sea) ceasefire line • In terms of land area, it accounts for 0.5% (907km2) of the total land area of the Korean Peninsula The PLZ refers to the border area including the DMZ. Yeoncheon- gun (Gyeonggi-do), Paju-si, Gimpo-si, Ongjin-gun and Ganghwa-gun (Incheon-si), Cheorwon-gun (Gangwon-do), Hwacheon-gun, Yanggu- gun, Inje-gun and Goseong-gun all belong to the PLZ. It is expected that tourist attractions, preservation of the ecosystem and national unification will be realized here in the PLZ under the theme of “Peace and Life.” The Road to Peace and Life THE DMZ TOUR COURSE GUIDEBOOK The DMZ Tour Course Section 7 Section 6 Section 5 Section 4 Section 3 Section 2 Section 1 DMZ DMZ DMZ Goseong Civilian Controlled Line Civilian Controlled Line Cheorwon DMZ Yanggu Yeoncheon Hwacheon Inje Civilian Controlled Line Paju DMZ Ganghwa Gimpo Prologue 06 Section 1 A trail from the East Sea to the mountain peak in the west 12 Goseong•Inje 100km Goseong Unification Observatory → Hwajinpo Lake → Jinburyeong Peak → Hyangrobong Peak → Manhae Village → Peace & Life Hill Section 2 A place where traces of war and present-day life coexist 24 Yanggu 60km War Memoria → The 4th Infiltration Tunnel → Eulji Observatory → Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Armies and Influence: Public Deference to Foreign Policy Elites
    Armies and Influence: Public Deference to Foreign Policy Elites Tyler Jost⇤ and Joshua D. Kertzer† Last modified: January 20, 2021 Abstract: When is the public more likely to defer to elites on foreign policy? Existing research suggests the public takes its cues from co-partisans, but what happens when co-partisans disagree? Drawing on research on the social origins of trust, we argue that the public prioritizes information from elites who signal expertise through prior experience. However, di↵ering social standing of government institutions means the public values some types of experience more than others, even when the experience lies outside the policy domain of the cue. Using a conjoint experiment, we show that the American public defers to cue-givers with experience — but that it is especially deferential towards military experience, even on non-military issues. We replicate our findings in a second conjoint experiment showing that the same dynamics hold when considering partisan candidates for cabinet positions. The results have important implications for the study of public opinion, bureaucratic politics, and civil-military relations. ⇤Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brown University. Email: tyler [email protected]: http://www.tylerjost.com †Professor of Government, Department of Government, Harvard University. 1737 Cambridge St, Cambridge MA 02138. Email: [email protected]:http://people.fas.harvard.edu/˜jkertzer/ In January 2017, three nominees for senior positions in the Trump administration — James Mattis, Rex Tillerson, and Mike Pompeo — publicly testified before Congress. On issues ranging from the Iran deal, to the ban on immigrants from a set of Muslim-majority countries, to US defense policy toward Russia, the nominees o↵ered policy assessments and recommendations that not only di↵ered from President Trump, but also from one another.1 Long after these confirmation hearings ended, commentators continue to note that the Trump cabinet has been filled with an array of dissenting voices.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Mike: Fort Bragg Mascot Has Md
    July 11, 2019 • APG News B3 Iron Mike: Fort Bragg Mascot Has Md. Roots BY ASHLEIGH BICKLER CECOM ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, Md. -- Nestled amidst a colorful array of well- tended flowers and bushes, within view of the XVIII Airborne Corps commander’s Courtesy photo office at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, stands a monument dedicated to the Airborne Soldier. Iron Mike, the Airborne Trooper, created by Bel Air artist Leah Hiebert, stands in While the nearly 17-foot tall statue is offi- the traffic circle in front of the XVIII Airborne Corps headquarters at Fort Bragg, cially named “The Airborne Trooper,” it is North Carolina. colloquially known as Iron Mike. The statue year, in Fayetteville, the Army hosts the ue reads: “Iron Mike In honor of Airborne is said to keep eternal watch on the post flag, Wear Blue: Run to Remember All American Troopers whose courage, dedication, and tra- and those who listen closely, can almost hear Marathon and the Mike to Mike Half Mar- ditions make them the world’s finest fight- it whisper the airborne moto, “All the Way!” athon. The Mike to Mike starts at the Iron ing soldiers”. That statement embodies the The moniker “Iron Mike” was common- Mike statue at the Airborne & Special Oper- strength, tenacity, and ferocity of the XVIII ly used in the early 20th century to refer to ations Museum and ends at the Iron Mike Airborne Corps and is a fitting tribute to its military statues - so much so, that the nick- statue at Fort Bragg. Participants literally run continued mission today.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence) Division, U.S
    Processed by: TB BETTS Date: 5/4/93 BETTS, THOMAS J. (OH-397) 319 pages Open Officer in G-2 (intelligence) division, U.S. War Department, 1938-43; deputy G-2 at COSSAC and SHAEF, 1943-45 DESCRIPTION: Interview #1 [October 18, 1973; pp 1-84] Early life; travels abroad as a child. Early military career: decision to join army during World War I; commissioning of officers; coast artillery units; service in France; Camp Genicart near Bordeaux; Fort Eustis, VA, 1919-23; Philippines, 1923; Gen. Leonard Wood; service in China; return to US via Europe 1928; lack of promotions during inter-war years; Lyman Lemnitzer; coast artillery school, 1928-29. Ghostwriter in War Department, 1929-33: drafting speeches and reports for War Department, 1929-33: drafting speeches and reports for War Department officials; Patrick J. Hurley; DDE as a ghostwriter; Douglas MacArthur. Work with CCC in Illinois. G-2 (intelligence) officer at Presidio, San Francisco, 1935- 37: fear of communists and labor unions. Command & General Staff School, Fort Leavenworth, 1937-38. G-2 (intelligence) branch of War Department, 1938-43: organization of branch; Betts as a China expert; daily office routine; cooperation with State Department; Joseph Stilwell as military attaché in China; Japan-China War; deciphering Japanese diplomatic code (Purple); limited distribution of 1941; evaluation of State Department cable traffic; knowledge of German attack on Norway, 1940; Cordell Hull; lack of staff in G-2; importance of military attaché reports; Latin America; advance knowledge of Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Interview #2 [November 20, 1974; pp 85-129] G-2 (intelligence) branch of War Department: importance of State Department Cables; Col.
    [Show full text]
  • With Haldeman Gone, Gen. Alexander H Ig Became the President's Shield
    hie, of Staff With Haldeman gone, Gen. Alexander H ig became the President's shield. ME n came the Agnew resignation, the Mid-East war, "the Saturday night massacre." These have been "six peculiar months," says Haig. By Nick Thimmesch Spiro T. Agnew, the first Vice President in heartily before cracking, "I'll take execu- U.S. history to be forced from office for a tive privilege on that." Press him fiercely, crime; the continuing, traumatic hassle as questioners did on "Face the Nation" re- over the celebrated "Nixon tapes," spools cently, and Haig will utter an explanation nce Gen. Alexander M. Haig Jr. more precious than gold; the axing of Spe- 'concerning the tape issue which is at vari- was formally appointed White cial Watergate Prosecutor Archibald Cox ance with the facts. Haig has become a 0 House Chief of Staff last June, after and attendant ramming to the wall of At- public man, and, therefore, more vulnera- emergency duty in the void suddenly left by torney General Elliot Richardson and his ble. Unless there is a dramatic transforma- H. R. (Bob) Haldeman, the reaction deputy, William D. Ruckelshaus, with tion, say, like St. Paul's conversion, there around town was almost all favorable. Af- their consequent resignations; and of will always be a military man in the civilian 2 ter all, as Dr. Henry A. Kissinger's dep- course, a situation more familiar to him, suits worn by Al Haig. He's sensitive about cn uty, he was known to be friendly, accessi- and more up his alley, the Middle East cri- this, and argues his case.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sic 'Em Ned”: Edward M. Almond and His Army, 1916
    “SIC ’EM NED”: EDWARD M. ALMOND AND HIS ARMY, 1916-1953 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Michael E. Lynch August 2014 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Gregory J. W. Urwin, Advisory Chair, Department of History Dr. Kenneth L. Kusmer, Department of History Dr. Jay Lockenour, Department of History Dr. Dennis Showalter, External Member, Colorado College i © Copyright 2014 by Michael E. Lynch All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Edward Mallory “Ned” Almond belonged to the generation of US Army officers who came of age during World War I and went on to hold important command positions in World War II and the Korean War. His contemporaries included some of America’s greatest captains such as Omar N. Bradley. While Almond is no longer a household name, he played a key role in Army history. Almond was ambitious and gave his all to everything he did. He was a careful student of his profession, a successful commander at battalion and corps level, a dedicated staff officer, something of a scholar, a paternalistic commander turned vehement racist, and a right-wing zealot. He earned his greatest accolades commanding the American troops who landed at Inchon, South Korea, on September 15, 1950, an amphibious flanking movement that temporarily transformed the nature of the Korean War. A soldier of such accomplishments and contradictions has gone too long without a scholarly biography; this dissertation will fill that void. This biography of Lt. Gen. Edward M. Almond makes a significant and original contribution to the existing historiography by examining his life in the context of the times in which he served.
    [Show full text]